December 11, 2013
— Ace But you knew that.
There is one good thing I've heard about it and one neutral thing.
The good thing: The compromise calls for federal workers to pay more for their pensions. That is terrific. Update: Not so terrific. MTF writes:
Small point Ace, but the increased worker contribution to federal pensions applies only to new employees. It's still a revolutionary change, but the budget impact is delayed.
The neutral thing: The additional tax for airline travel that they're calling a "user fee" rather than a tax does seem like it can be fairly characterized as a user fee. Cavuto had a guy on explaining that a fee of $2.50 per ticket per leg was imposed in 2002, to partially defray the costs of the huge new TSA security system.
However, that didn't cover all of TSA's costs, and TSA actually costs more now than it did five years ago. Despite the fact that less people are actually traveling, due to Obama's Endless Recession.
So, calling it a "user's fee" does not seem to abuse the language. It actually does pay for the costs the user is directly incurring.
It might be better to cut back on the TSA -- in fact, I'm pretty sure it would be. But this small item doesn't seem to be a Gigantic Lie, like the ones Obama likes to tell.
The new charge will be a flat $5.60, but that won't (if Cavuto's guy had this right, which I'm not sure he did) be per leg of a trip. So the actual increased cost for a two-way flight might be only $0.60.
Update: The Wall Street Journal has the facts straight:
The feds currently charge $2.50 on nonstop flights, and $5 for flights with a connection, and the deal will establish a simple $5.60 fee for all one-way trips regardless of the number of connections. The fees will be passed along to passengers in higher ticket costs.
So you'll be charged an extra $2.50 per flight on nonstops and an extra $0.60 on flights with a connection.
Now for the bad stuff.
Here's the first and most important gimmick. Paul Ryan is claiming, "Hey man, how can you say I'm abandoning my principles? This compromise actually cuts the deficit by a further $28 billion (over ten years) than the current plan!!! So this actually cuts more spending than the current, sequester-bound spending levels!"
Yeah that approaches Gigantic Lie territory. Here's how they can spend more in the next year and then claim their compromise actually saves more money over ten years:
They spend more in the years they care about, 2014 and 2015. For these years, they increase spending by a total of $63 billion.
But currently, the sequester-capped spending levels would expire in 2021 (it was set to run from 2011 to 2021). So what Ryan says is "Now we'll also impose sequester-caps on the out years of 2022 and 2023, so that's two more years under the sequester, so we actually wind up cutting more spending!"
You can see the problem. They're not willing to abide by the terms of the sequester in 2014 and 2015. They want to spend more. So they undo the sequester caps in 2014 and 2015, and then pretend to extend the sequester from 2021 to 2023.
Instead of abiding by the sequester in the two following years, they'll abandon it in the two years we're actually about to pass into, and promise -- swearsies! -- they'll abide by it later.
This is obviously nonsense. First of all, it establishes the precedent of ducking the sequester forever. Two years from now, they'll vote to spend more money, but say "Over ten years, we're lowering the deficit, by extending the sequester from 2023 to 2025!!!"
No you're not. To spend less money, you have to, at some point, spend less money. If you keep delaying the day you actually start spending less money, you'll never spend less money.
This is like someone putting off going on a diet forever but promising "When I do go on the diet, I'll stay on it for a really really really long time!"
At some point, you have to actually go on the diet if you want to lose weight. Paul Ryan's plan just says, "Eh, we'll get in shape two years from now."
Even worse than all that is this heartbreaking chart from Reason, which shows federal spending unrestrained by the sequester (that is, what the government had planned to spend) versus the lower spending under the sequester.
This is the end of the world scenario we're working so hard to undo, Guys:

You see that teeny, tiny difference in sequester and non-sequester spending? That little difference is what we're now reduced to fighting over. That insignificant bit.
Even that pittance of savings is too much, too controversial, too politically dangerous to touch. So even that ludicrously small amount of savings must be undone by the Republican Party, because we just can't win elections when we're making draconian cuts like that.
But once the GOP is in control of all branches of government, then they'll start getting serious about putting the government on a diet.
Swearsies!
Posted by: Ace at
03:26 PM
| Comments (250)
Post contains 877 words, total size 5 kb.
Sigh.
Like every other politician, you.... disappoint me greatly.
Posted by: shibumi at December 11, 2013 03:29 PM (25HWz)
I tell people about the lube and I tell people . . . .
You want to know why I don't believe a word of this. Go read Parliament of Whores. The exact same promises were made then.
Parliament of Whores was published in 1991.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD, you taunty bitch. at December 11, 2013 03:29 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at December 11, 2013 03:30 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 11, 2013 03:30 PM (olDqf)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 11, 2013 03:31 PM (olDqf)
Posted by: Minnfidel at December 11, 2013 03:31 PM (5M2+1)
'This whole budget deal is bullshit and if you believe it I have some mouth surprises for you, too.'
Posted by: EROWMER at December 11, 2013 03:31 PM (OONaw)
To get off the planet, we need to hitch a ride with the PRC or India.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 11, 2013 03:31 PM (JdUCt)
Posted by: soothsayer at December 11, 2013 03:31 PM (x3uXx)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 11, 2013 03:31 PM (olDqf)
Are you fucking kidding me???
What a scam!
Posted by: don't quote me on this at December 11, 2013 03:31 PM (VJpOJ)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at December 11, 2013 03:32 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at December 11, 2013 03:32 PM (XWw96)
The sequester goes away in the same bill that entirely repeals Obamacare.
The savings from repealing Obamacare go to restoring the spending the sequester did away with.
Simple as that.
No half measures, no compromises.
Let Pelosi, Reid and Obama chew on that, as the members of the various Democratic delegations cast an increasingly nervous eye on their plummeting polls.
Posted by: torquewrench at December 11, 2013 03:33 PM (gqT4g)
Posted by: MTF at December 11, 2013 03:33 PM (qCtp4)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at December 11, 2013 03:33 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 11, 2013 03:33 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 11, 2013 03:33 PM (olDqf)
Posted by: toby928© of the banned at December 11, 2013 03:33 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: SFGoth at December 11, 2013 03:34 PM (JuoVO)
Posted by: newrouter at December 11, 2013 03:34 PM (dsgCY)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 11, 2013 03:34 PM (olDqf)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 11, 2013 03:34 PM (olDqf)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 11, 2013 03:35 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Dianna at December 11, 2013 03:35 PM (5SUaO)
http://tinyurl.com/m8jdlu3
The guy, think of him as Ryan or Boehner...
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 11, 2013 03:36 PM (JdUCt)
Beltway gossips say Ryan is harboring hopes of another spot on a national ticket.
If it's a one-way ticket out of the country, I could get behind that. Otherwise, fuck off.
Posted by: torquewrench at December 11, 2013 03:36 PM (gqT4g)
what are the Republicans gonna run on in '14 and '16 that will get people to vote *for* them?
Posted by: soothsayer at December 11, 2013 07:31 PM (x3uXx)
Smokes, pr0n, and more Val U Rite!
GOP!!!
Posted by: EC at December 11, 2013 03:36 PM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at December 11, 2013 03:36 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at December 11, 2013 03:36 PM (olDqf)
http://tinyurl.com/m8jdlu3
The guy, think of him as Ryan or Boehner...
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 11, 2013 07:36 PM (JdUCt)
Oh hello.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD, you taunty bitch. at December 11, 2013 03:37 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at December 11, 2013 03:37 PM (kxSZr)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 11, 2013 03:37 PM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Jinx the Cat at December 11, 2013 03:38 PM (l3vZN)
Posted by: grammie winger at December 11, 2013 03:38 PM (P6QsQ)
Anyone who claims surprise at any Republican's antics hasn't been paying attention the past thirty years.
Anyone who still is registered Republican deserves what they get, good and hard.
Counter-economic revolution is the future.
Posted by: The Palm Beach Agorist at December 11, 2013 03:38 PM (opd3Z)
Posted by: joe biden at December 11, 2013 03:38 PM (R6JT1)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 11, 2013 03:38 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Slow Joey B. at December 11, 2013 03:39 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 11, 2013 03:39 PM (JdUCt)
Posted by: MTF at December 11, 2013 03:40 PM (qCtp4)
Posted by: the littl shyning man at December 11, 2013 03:40 PM (AuIxh)
Read says "you know its been awhile since I got any, how about I give you 20 bucks and you suck me off?"
Ryan says "OK."
Posted by: OG Celtic American at December 11, 2013 03:40 PM (vHRtU)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 11, 2013 03:41 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: logprof at December 11, 2013 03:41 PM (X3GkB)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 11, 2013 03:41 PM (JdUCt)
Funny how that works.
You know, there's part of me that sort of gets why Our Betters think the Burning Times won't come. After all, the prediction of collapse has been out there for decades and it hasn't happened yet so obviously it won't.
Slowly. Then all at once.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD, you taunty bitch. at December 11, 2013 03:42 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 11, 2013 03:43 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: steevy at December 11, 2013 03:43 PM (zqvg6)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Rounding Error Extraordinaire at December 11, 2013 03:43 PM (vUMwn)
Posted by: rickl at December 11, 2013 03:44 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: fluffy & hungry at December 11, 2013 03:44 PM (tUay6)
Posted by: The Can at December 11, 2013 03:44 PM (vUMwn)
Posted by: GOP at December 11, 2013 03:45 PM (ygAxO)
Jennifer Rubin @JRubinBlogger
Budget good for economy, for natl. security and for GOP
So, there you go. And she's a conservative and everything. Says so on her parking space at the Washington Post.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 11, 2013 03:45 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Soona at December 11, 2013 03:46 PM (Tx68O)
Posted by: That Chicken at December 11, 2013 03:46 PM (X3GkB)
Posted by: joe biden at December 11, 2013 03:46 PM (R6JT1)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at December 11, 2013 03:46 PM (qyfb5)
There are 3 things the Republicans need to get right:
1. Repeal Obamacare
2. Stop Amnesty
3. Hold the line on spending
Posted by: Zombie Commie Walter Cronkite at December 11, 2013 03:47 PM (oNqbW)
I'm kind of imagining Berlin in the summer of 1945, except the rapists won't be so organized.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at December 11, 2013 03:47 PM (ZKzrr)
I'm surprised at the number of commenters here who, by the tone of their comments, indicate they think their vote is important, or that voting can change anything in post-modernist Amerikka.
Sincere best wishes from the agorist wing of the libertarians.
Posted by: The Palm Beach Agorist at December 11, 2013 03:47 PM (opd3Z)
Don't worry. You'll get it back. Trust us.
Posted by: The Democrats AND the Republicans at December 11, 2013 03:48 PM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD, you taunty bitch. at December 11, 2013 07:47 PM (Gk3SS)
"Hello! This is....Peggy..."
Posted by: EC at December 11, 2013 03:48 PM (doBIb)
Posted by: Peaches at December 11, 2013 03:48 PM (8lmkt)
http://www.caintv.com/caption-contest-we-have-a-winn
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 11, 2013 03:48 PM (JdUCt)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at December 11, 2013 03:48 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Paul Ryan at December 11, 2013 03:48 PM (vHRtU)
1. Repeal Obamacare
2. Stop Amnesty
3. Hold the line on spending
Posted by: Zombie Commie Walter Cronkite at December 11, 2013 07:47 PM (oNqbW)
So. You're saying we're fucked then?
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD, you taunty bitch. at December 11, 2013 03:48 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: The Can at December 11, 2013 03:48 PM (vUMwn)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at December 11, 2013 03:48 PM (qyfb5)
'This whole budget deal is bullshit and if you believe it I have some mouth surprises for you, too.'
Posted by: EROWMER at December 11, 2013 07:31 PM (OONaw)
Well , just play the video, he does the same show every time .
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at December 11, 2013 03:49 PM (AWmfW)
Paul Ryan came away with a deal that is reasonable given the circumstances, and certainly one that enhances his national stature even though some ”shutter-the-government-again” conservatives will be unhappy with the deal and with Ryan. ... The deal is best understood as the third act of the effort that will culminate in the repeal of Obamacare and the restoration of America’s place in the world beginning in 2017.
Hugh Hewitt
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at December 11, 2013 03:49 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: grammie winger at December 11, 2013 03:50 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Lucky Pierre at December 11, 2013 03:50 PM (5fSr7)
Posted by: --- at December 11, 2013 03:50 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: steevy at December 11, 2013 03:50 PM (zqvg6)
Okay, I have already copped to being dumber than a bag of hammers, so could someone please explain this to me? No big words and no math, por favor.
Posted by: Peaches at December 11, 2013 03:51 PM (8lmkt)
Posted by: OG Celtic American at December 11, 2013 03:51 PM (vHRtU)
Posted by: John Boehner at December 11, 2013 03:51 PM (eHIJJ)
It's the same old game.
Spending increases now, spending cuts at a later date, always after the next budget "deal" kills them.
Posted by: Max Entropy at December 11, 2013 03:51 PM (QKYRm)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 11, 2013 03:51 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 11, 2013 03:51 PM (JdUCt)
2. He is high
Not mutually exclusive. Not by a long shot. Don't ask me how I know.
Posted by: Peaches at December 11, 2013 03:52 PM (8lmkt)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at December 11, 2013 03:52 PM (9++oZ)
Oh, yeah, SpaceX. Near as I can figure, that thing works like this:
-- The government takes tax money from schmucks like me
-- The government gives the money to Elon Musk
-- Musk uses the money to design a new rocket
-- Musk then charges the government to fly stuff in space on the rocket
-- For which the government takes more money from schmucks like me
-- Musk keeps all the profits
-- Musk then donates heavily to Barack Obama
I guess I need some Underpants Gnomes to explain to me why it is that I need to be excited about this high-tech exercise in venture socialism, with public investment producing private profits.
I was a whole lot happier when Rutan's vehicle won the X Prize with not a single penny of government money. THAT is worth cheering about.
Posted by: torquewrench at December 11, 2013 03:52 PM (gqT4g)
------------
I don't think it was shit at the time. I really don't. I think something has shifted with him. Not sure what and not sure why.
Posted by: grammie winger at December 11, 2013 03:52 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 11, 2013 03:52 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Nip Sip at December 11, 2013 03:52 PM (0FSuD)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at December 11, 2013 03:53 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 11, 2013 03:53 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: The Palm Beach Agorist at December 11, 2013 03:53 PM (opd3Z)
Posted by: Adriane... at December 11, 2013 03:53 PM (jdRXP)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at December 11, 2013 03:53 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: dogfish at December 11, 2013 03:54 PM (nsOJa)
Posted by: --- at December 11, 2013 03:54 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at December 11, 2013 07:53 PM (aDwsi)
Mea culpa, Mike, please forgive. Let's make it a box of rocks. Or a Biden family reunion.
Posted by: Peaches at December 11, 2013 03:55 PM (8lmkt)
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at December 11, 2013 03:55 PM (+w1hQ)
Posted by: grammie winger at December 11, 2013 03:56 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: The Palm Beach Agorist at December 11, 2013 03:56 PM (opd3Z)
Posted by: OG Celtic American at December 11, 2013 03:57 PM (vHRtU)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 11, 2013 03:57 PM (g1DWB)
>>What the hell?
JackStraw: "Kabuki..."
Yep. Kabuki all the way down.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at December 11, 2013 03:58 PM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at December 11, 2013 03:58 PM (Nsoq9)
Posted by: toby928© of the banned at December 11, 2013 03:58 PM (evdj2)
Oh man. I was explaining to the boss and a client the other day that I'm sort of kicking around getting a new car because I can't park mine. This kicked off a good 10 minute discussion by them about how my car isn't that big (it's a four door sedan by the by) and how it shouldn't be that hard to park and on and on.
I finally had to point out to them that the problem with the parking wasn't so much the fault of the car.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD, you taunty bitch. at December 11, 2013 03:58 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 11, 2013 03:59 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Peaches at December 11, 2013 04:00 PM (8lmkt)
Posted by: rickl at December 11, 2013 04:00 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at December 11, 2013 07:58 PM (Nsoq9)
-----------
I guess grief makes people do things out of character.
Posted by: grammie winger at December 11, 2013 04:00 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at December 11, 2013 07:58 PM (Nsoq9)
That is some funny shit right there, bth!
Posted by: Peaches at December 11, 2013 04:01 PM (8lmkt)
Posted by: sexypig at December 11, 2013 04:01 PM (dZQh7)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 11, 2013 04:02 PM (JdUCt)
Okay, I have already copped to being dumber than a bag of hammers,.....
------------------
What, exactly, are you trying to tell me?
Posted by: Mike Hammer at December 11, 2013 07:53 PM (aDwsi)
--------------------------------------------------
Does your cat have a computer that you don't know about?
Posted by: Soona at December 11, 2013 04:03 PM (Tx68O)
Posted by: grammie winger at December 11, 2013 04:03 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD, you taunty bitch. at December 11, 2013 07:58 PM (Gk3SS)
Oh, atc, I feel you (not in a weird way, of course). I am so good at so many things but the plain truth is that I suck at parking. I look at those illegal dudes who valet park my car and I always tell them, I would get fired in 10 minutes if this was my job. And I would, I'm not just trying to get them to like me.
Posted by: Peaches at December 11, 2013 04:03 PM (8lmkt)
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at December 11, 2013 04:03 PM (y9dfJ)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 11, 2013 04:03 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: OG Celtic American at December 11, 2013 04:03 PM (vHRtU)
Posted by: sexypig at December 11, 2013 04:03 PM (dZQh7)
Posted by: MTF at December 11, 2013 04:04 PM (qCtp4)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 11, 2013 04:04 PM (JdUCt)
Posted by: no good deed at December 11, 2013 04:04 PM (HsJeN)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 11, 2013 04:05 PM (g1DWB)
--------------------
Ha! Love that last line!
Posted by: grammie winger at December 11, 2013 04:05 PM (P6QsQ)
The American system is set up to make DC more important, powerful, and wealthy.
If I were in charge of, say, a burger stand I would do everything possible to turn my burger stand into the next McDonalds. I'd get rewarded for that.
Likewise, any politician (or civil servant!) we send to DC has an interest in increasing DC's importance, power, and wealth. He might resist that urge for many years but he will succumb eventually.
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at December 11, 2013 04:05 PM (Nsoq9)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 11, 2013 08:02 PM (JdUCt)
I'm thinking more the silver.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD, you taunty bitch. at December 11, 2013 04:07 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at December 11, 2013 04:07 PM (DL2i+)
And then they'll be focused on 2016. And then on 2018. And then on 2020. Gosh darn, there just never seems to be enough time to deal with the fiscal problem because OMG DEMOCRATS MIGHT WIN.
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at December 11, 2013 04:07 PM (Nsoq9)
Posted by: no good deed at December 11, 2013 08:04 PM (HsJeN)
It's not really a "camp," more like an old refrigerator box where we fight over cheap swill and troll for lame hobos to roast over a trash fire at this point.
Posted by: Peaches at December 11, 2013 04:07 PM (8lmkt)
Posted by: J. Wellington Wimpy, GOP Political Advisor at December 11, 2013 04:08 PM (lZBBB)
See, to me, agreeing to spend a trillion dollars more than we have every year is dick stepping with golf shoes.
Posted by: toby928© of the banned at December 11, 2013 04:08 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: Joey Biden at December 11, 2013 04:08 PM (jucos)
Posted by: Cicero Kid at December 11, 2013 04:08 PM (6fSty)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at December 11, 2013 04:08 PM (aDwsi)
*Things I learn from going to Riff Trax Santa Claus Conquers the Martians.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 11, 2013 04:09 PM (JdUCt)
AWESOME!!!! Even if they are stupid enough to think Tepid Air is "conservative." Clearly they never read the comments.
Posted by: Peaches at December 11, 2013 04:09 PM (8lmkt)
Damn it, Paul. I remember when you had the moronettes swooning.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at December 11, 2013 04:10 PM (lVPtV)
Posted by: POTUS at December 11, 2013 04:10 PM (vHRtU)
Posted by: My Name is Nobody at December 11, 2013 04:11 PM (5Q1ZU)
Posted by: traye at December 11, 2013 04:12 PM (sirx+)
No. It cannot.
Posted by: sexypig at December 11, 2013 08:03 PM (dZQh7)
---------------------------------------------
Word
Posted by: Soona at December 11, 2013 04:12 PM (Tx68O)
Posted by: toby928© of the banned at December 11, 2013 04:13 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: Angel with a sword at December 11, 2013 04:13 PM (hpgw1)
Posted by: wooga at December 11, 2013 04:13 PM (TXmih)
I will never forgive my fellow 'conservatives' who sat home in November and let this happen.
-C
Posted by: cnation at December 11, 2013 04:13 PM (gzqLV)
Posted by: Third Stage Guild Navigator at December 11, 2013 04:13 PM (dvRYt)
Posted by: H Badger at December 11, 2013 04:14 PM (3xvbc)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 11, 2013 04:14 PM (g1DWB)
Posted by: toby928© of the banned at December 11, 2013 04:14 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: Nip Sip at December 11, 2013 04:15 PM (0FSuD)
Posted by: Peaches at December 11, 2013 04:15 PM (8lmkt)
McCain/Ryan 2016!
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at December 11, 2013 04:15 PM (Nsoq9)
Posted by: FUBAR at December 11, 2013 04:15 PM (Cs2tJ)
You can buy a backup camera get at any autoparts store now.
Not sure how low on the dash you can mount the display though.
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at December 11, 2013 04:15 PM (DL2i+)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at December 11, 2013 08:08 PM (aDwsi)
Yup. Some of the Foci has park assist as an option. I will admit that I am not too sure what I think about my car parking itself. I mean, I half expect it to start singing Daisy Daisy when it does.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD, you taunty bitch. at December 11, 2013 04:16 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Joe at December 11, 2013 04:16 PM (B+xcR)
Posted by: Lloyd Loar at December 11, 2013 04:16 PM (9u2hL)
-C
Posted by: cnation at December 11, 2013 08:13 PM (gzqLV)
THIS, times eleventy! Srsly, we could be sitting here right now hatin' on Mitt, but no, we have to do this instead. Not fun!
Posted by: Peaches at December 11, 2013 04:16 PM (8lmkt)
Posted by: Soona at December 11, 2013 04:16 PM (Tx68O)
Posted by: toby928© of the banned at December 11, 2013 04:17 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 11, 2013 04:18 PM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Weirddave at December 11, 2013 04:18 PM (N/cFh)
Posted by: rickl at December 11, 2013 04:18 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Peaches at December 11, 2013 04:18 PM (8lmkt)
Posted by: sexypig at December 11, 2013 04:18 PM (dZQh7)
Posted by: toby928© of the banned at December 11, 2013 04:18 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 11, 2013 08:14 PM (g1DWB)
------------
Two things Ryan said on Greta last night made some sense to me.
One - that it's up to the House to come up with a budget and this is about as good as they can get with the current Senate and WH. They need to do their job, and keep the budget under Congress's control rather than simply passing CR's and letting the President fill in the numbers he want.
Two - that they do not want shutdown distractions or any other distractions that will interfere with making the focus Obamacare before the 2014 elections.
Posted by: grammie winger at December 11, 2013 04:19 PM (P6QsQ)
So why fucking bother?
They've been running without one for what 5 years now. Why give them a bad one and not be able to point out they won't pass one and we're running without it?
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at December 11, 2013 04:19 PM (DL2i+)
Alex, "Open the car doors HAL!"
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at December 11, 2013 04:19 PM (JdUCt)
Posted by: sexypig at December 11, 2013 04:20 PM (dZQh7)
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 11, 2013 04:20 PM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Joe Biden at December 11, 2013 04:21 PM (JQuNB)
Politicians start off OK, and then, after a period of time, they all go bad and cave to their donors/special interests.
Term limits for... EVERYONE.
That might solve it.
Posted by: shibumi at December 11, 2013 04:21 PM (25HWz)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 11, 2013 04:21 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: sexypig at December 11, 2013 04:22 PM (dZQh7)
Posted by: Cicero Kid at December 11, 2013 04:22 PM (6fSty)
Posted by: Romeo13 at December 11, 2013 04:22 PM (lZBBB)
You have now made me publicly agree with Rand Paul, who is the son of Uncle Doctor Crazy!
Posted by: shibumi at December 11, 2013 04:22 PM (25HWz)
Posted by: Third Stage Guild Navigator at December 11, 2013 04:22 PM (dvRYt)
--------------------
He did, actually.
Posted by: grammie winger at December 11, 2013 04:22 PM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Peaches at December 11, 2013 08:18 PM (8lmkt)
--------------------------------------------
Coburn can be iffy sometimes. Inhofe is rock solid unless he's dealing with farm subsidies. That's where he goes off the rails.
Posted by: Soona at December 11, 2013 04:23 PM (Tx68O)
Didn't happen. Keep the current shit up and watch it come true though.
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at December 11, 2013 04:23 PM (DL2i+)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at December 11, 2013 04:23 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at December 11, 2013 04:24 PM (qyfb5)
Don't buy this horse shit they sell you to wait until 2017, there will be no more private health insurance by then and these lying shitweasels in the GOP know it. Push the donks hard, now.
Posted by: mugiwara at December 11, 2013 04:24 PM (hpYnL)
Posted by: I Sign Jive at December 11, 2013 04:25 PM (vHRtU)
Posted by: Third Stage Guild Navigator at December 11, 2013 08:22 PM (dvRYt)
-------------------------------------------
....while Sharmuta watches.
Posted by: Soona at December 11, 2013 04:25 PM (Tx68O)
***
The US is 17 trillion fucking dollars in debt and we're supposed to throw our panties at him because he promises to cut 28 billion over ten years? Fuck him.
Posted by: B at December 11, 2013 04:26 PM (6iEQd)
Toby928 at 128.
Horses. I was born with cows, and I'll end with cows, but, in between, there's a whole lot more money in horses.
Posted by: The Palm Beach Agorist at December 11, 2013 04:26 PM (opd3Z)
Posted by: wooga at December 11, 2013 04:28 PM (TXmih)
Posted by: The Palm Beach Agorist at December 11, 2013 08:26 PM (opd3Z)
-------------------------------------------
I know a lot of ranchers that would debate that.
Posted by: Soona at December 11, 2013 04:29 PM (Tx68O)
Posted by: Prudence Smythe at December 11, 2013 04:29 PM (Xkr3W)
Posted by: tsrblke (Tablet) at December 11, 2013 04:29 PM (ibAnY)
Posted by: Buzzion at December 11, 2013 04:29 PM (CEuiH)
Posted by: wooga at December 11, 2013 04:29 PM (TXmih)
Posted by: JackStraw at December 11, 2013 04:30 PM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Prudence Smythe at December 11, 2013 08:29 PM (Xkr3W)
--------------------------------------------
I LOLed. That brought back some good memories from a long time ago.
Posted by: Soona at December 11, 2013 04:31 PM (Tx68O)
Posted by: Arkansas Yankee at December 11, 2013 04:31 PM (DlsJN)
Posted by: Joe at December 11, 2013 04:31 PM (B+xcR)
Posted by: Ribald Conservative riding Orca at December 11, 2013 04:31 PM (dCwZe)
Posted by: The Palm Beach Agorist at December 11, 2013 04:33 PM (opd3Z)
Posted by: rickl at December 11, 2013 04:34 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Truck Monkey, Gruntled New Business Owner at December 11, 2013 04:35 PM (jucos)
Posted by: Feh at December 11, 2013 04:38 PM (g/zj9)
Sorry sir, we don't serve toast after 11 am.
Alright, do you have tunafish sandwiches?
Yes.
Fine. I'll have a tunafish sandwich on toasted bread. Now hold the mayo, lettuce, and tunafish.
Coming right up sir...Here you go.
crunch...waiter, this toast tastes like shit.
This is a Republican restaurant, sir. All our sandwiches come with shit.
Posted by: GnuBreed at December 11, 2013 04:38 PM (wNF3N)
Posted by: Joe at December 11, 2013 04:39 PM (B+xcR)
Posted by: Sharkman at December 11, 2013 04:42 PM (ck9M0)
That one third writes the checks and borrows the money. Want to end deficit spending? Don't vote to raise the debt ceiling. Go back to that hard-scrabble budget of 2006, when we were financing two wars.
Posted by: toby928© of the banned at December 11, 2013 04:47 PM (evdj2)
Posted by: RobM1981 at December 11, 2013 04:51 PM (zurJC)
Posted by: blindside at December 11, 2013 05:58 PM (ajjwb)
Posted by: Mistress Overdone at December 11, 2013 06:09 PM (2/oBD)
Have the President submit a generic budget for each of the major departments,
Let each Congresscritter (NOT A GANG OF THE FEW -- everyone in Congress ought to be equal in the budget process) decide how much each would spend on each department, give or take 20 percent of that department's budget. The total budgeted by any CongressCritter can not exceed the expected revenue.
Total all the Congresscritters budgets up, and you've got a bi-partisan budget outline for each Federal department.
Vote on that, then go home for a spell while everyone studies the individual budgets for each department.
Repeat for each department.
No bundling of department budgets with other departments, no ear marks, no BS. Single issue budgets for each department.
Ideally, taxpayers ought to have a say in how much of their money is spent on this or that in a <A HREF="http://drfredc.com/allright/tdb/tdb_form.htm">Taxpayer Directed Budget
</A> of a similar process. Let the taxpayers make the tough decisions on junk that politicians don't want to deal with... Taxpayers would likely get the federal budget under control in a few years, while politicians will take forever...
Posted by: Seipherd at December 11, 2013 06:17 PM (AortR)
But nutcase "conservatives" let grandstanding Ted Cruz stampede us into the waste of time and energy in the shutdown and we had to bail out with a shorter deal.
Want to blame someone for blowing the sequester? Cruz and those dummies in your mirrors seem likely culprits.
Posted by: Adjoran at December 11, 2013 07:16 PM (473jB)
Posted by: Joan of Argghh! at December 12, 2013 02:59 AM (jlJ9S)
Posted by: In the bunker at December 12, 2013 05:03 AM (ZVfnS)
Posted by: Dennis at December 12, 2013 05:27 AM (5jOb7)
Posted by: Bob at December 12, 2013 08:11 AM (5c9oV)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2889 seconds, 378 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: EC at December 11, 2013 03:29 PM (GQ8sn)