October 23, 2013
— Monty So the ObamaCare IT wildfire is still out of control.
Any enterprise IT project is hard. Government IT projects are an order of magnitude more difficult.*
A lot of federal agencies (Immigration, IRS, etc.) have a huge amount of legacy data sitting in mainframe databases. And these mainframe systems are, in many cases, a decade or more behind the technology curve. It's not just a matter of "implementing an interface" to the data -- it requires an enormous amount of heavy-lift to just extract the data and make it visible to the outside world in a usable form. And that's before you start worrying about things like security, normalization, or data-transformation.
A lot of the kids doing the programming of these systems have never worked with legacy stuff written in COBOL and stored on mainframes. In fact, the agencies themselves often have no idea how to modify the mainframe stuff -- all the programmers who wrote that stuff retired years ago. It might as well be written in Sumerian cuneiform for all they know. And if you, as an external entity, want a data feed from these systems and request a SOAP or REST web-service interface to the data, you're certain to get a blank stare or a "Huzzat?" response. Or you might get some atrocious botch written by a contract programmer brought in two days before that barely works even when all the conditions are perfect, and breaks immediately when approaching any kind of boundary condition.
Worse yet: there is no institutional memory. You'll spend weeks solving some problem or other only to discover quite by accident that some other programmer went through the same hassle the year before, but no one thought to write down how he did it or what the solution was. I've been on government IT projects where no one can even find the source code to the systems we were asked to maintain. You have to deal with civil-service lifers who are "in charge" of the project, but have absolutely no computer or IT management background. You run into inter-service turf battles, procurement headaches, long delays in communicating with project principals...Christ, the list is endless.
Federal government IT contracts are the Sargasso Sea of computer programming.
*Andy sends a link that explains in detail why this sort of thing is so complicated.
[UPDATE] For those of a technical bent, Jazz has a more detailed explanation of the issues that crop up when handling data in large IT projects.
Posted by: Monty at
10:00 AM
| Comments (284)
Post contains 427 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at October 23, 2013 10:03 AM (0HooB)
Yet all of the Barrycade signage was ready to go the day of the partial gubmint shutdown.
Priorities.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at October 23, 2013 10:04 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at October 23, 2013 10:04 AM (vd7A8)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 10:05 AM (ELdpj)
CNN quietly admits the Zerocare site, better known as 404care, is doomed.
http://tinyurl.com/k8o86ld
Posted by: maddogg at October 23, 2013 10:05 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Son of Liberty at October 23, 2013 10:07 AM (BPKIW)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 02:05 PM (ELdpj)
And, outside of righty blogs, nobody will hear a thing about it.
Posted by: joncelli at October 23, 2013 10:07 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Vic at October 23, 2013 10:07 AM (zZbNF)
Ghost Pirate Captains can impart awesome wisdom from time to time.
Posted by: Flyguy at October 23, 2013 10:07 AM (4eLZN)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at October 23, 2013 10:08 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 23, 2013 10:08 AM (b1/nQ)
So sorry...you didn't give us enough time to do this right, because we SO coulda done it perfectly, you guys.
Posted by: Kathleen "Cruella" Sebelius at October 23, 2013 10:08 AM (JRmiD)
A lot of the kids doing the programming of these systems have never worked with legacy stuff written in COBOL and stored on mainframes. In fact, the agencies themselves often have no idea how to modify the mainframe stuff -- all the programmers who wrote that stuff retired years ago. It might as well be written in Sumerian cuneiform for all they know.
---
When I took COBOL in college, after the end of the Y2K bubble, everyone I knew who was a programmer asked why it was a requirement for my degree.
Turns out that an ability to understand COBOL and write in Visual Basic ended up getting my my current job, as we had to move a ton of legacy shit over from COBOL into a new system written in VB using SQL Server.
Of course, the agency I work for had also been training its own programmer, in-house, how to do COBOL for years to maintain that beast in part because few schools out there still teach it.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 23, 2013 10:08 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: phoenixgirl at work at October 23, 2013 10:09 AM (8InM1)
Posted by: Dax at October 23, 2013 10:09 AM (/RRah)
You have to deal with civil-service lifers who are "in charge" of the project, but have absolutely no computer or IT management background. You run into inter-service turf battles, procurement headaches, long delays in communicating with project principals...Christ, the list is endless.
THIS. This is why I've been saying since this monstrosity "passed" that there was no way in hell they'd have a system up and running by this year. It was absolutely ludicrous to believe otherwise.
And to now have people throwing out estimates of, "They've got four weeks to fix this," I have to laugh. The bureaucratic oversight by luddite civil servants was bad enough during the initial development phase. It will be several orders of magnitude WORSE now, because this rollout has made the gubmint Look Bad. People are scrambling to save face and look involved, which means they will micromanage every damn detail even more than they did before. It will be excruciating for the programmers; if they don't go insane it will be a miracle.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 23, 2013 10:09 AM (4df7R)
A lot of federal agencies (Immigration, IRS, etc.) have a huge amount of legacy data sitting in mainframe databases. And these mainframe systems are, in many cases, a decade or more behind the technology curve. It's not just a matter of "implementing an interface" to the data -- it requires an enormous amount of heavy-lift to just extract the data and make it visible to the outside world in a usable form.
Old and Busted: We're from the government and we're here to help you!
The New Hotness: We're from the government and we'd really be able to muck things up if we could only figure out how!
Posted by: crisis du jour at October 23, 2013 10:09 AM (xviIo)
15 That pirate ship out there hasn't moved an inch in, like, forever.
We've been stuck in that disgusting sargassum -- which, by the way, no
matter how you cook it, still tastes like hot sargassum -- it's been
like, ten years.
Ghost Pirate Captains can impart awesome wisdom from time to time.
---
Now that we're done with that... what happened to the spirit of Major Tom?
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 23, 2013 10:09 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: Vic at October 23, 2013 10:10 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: Lynne at October 23, 2013 10:10 AM (8oCSY)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 23, 2013 10:10 AM (b1/nQ)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 10:11 AM (ELdpj)
And if you, as an external entity, want a data feed from these systems and request a SOAP or REST web-service interface to the data, you're certain to get a blank stare or a "Huzzat?"
Yeah I can relate to that.
Posted by: eleven at October 23, 2013 10:11 AM (GXZgZ)
No need to go down and get Willow. I sent my little buddy down to herd her north.
http://tinyurl.com/lk4tm4x
Posted by: maddogg at October 23, 2013 10:11 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Havedash at October 23, 2013 10:11 AM (BRhGr)
A lot of federal agencies (Immigration, IRS, etc.) have a huge amount of legacy data sitting in mainframe databases. And these mainframe systems are, in many cases, a decade or more behind the technology curve. It's not just a matter of "implementing an interface" to the data -- it requires an enormous amount of heavy-lift to just extract the data and make it visible to the outside world in a usable form. And that's before you start worrying about things like security, normalization, or data-transformation.
This isn't just fed data either, though fed databases are certainly huge. All of the states also ahve to transform their legacy data. When I worked at NH DHHS, the data system was so old and dated it was considered too expensive and too time-consuming to update. And that was just FINANCIAL data.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 23, 2013 10:11 AM (4df7R)
And just think of the daily staff meeting where every ignorant asshole has to pop in with crap they know nothing about but what they think will make them look good to their boss.
Posted by: Vic at October 23, 2013 10:12 AM (zZbNF)
-----------------
I can relate.
Time to go to the outlet mall.
Posted by: mama winger at October 23, 2013 10:13 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: NR Pax at October 23, 2013 10:13 AM (ODsL5)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at October 23, 2013 10:13 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami - GO CARDS !!! at October 23, 2013 10:13 AM (bCEmE)
I can attest to Monty's point.. there is very poor sharing of info when problems are fixed unless someone decides to try and fight the system and share. Even then, you run into complaints of trying to steal a job down the road from someone else on a similar contract.
The Government sloth-inertia is strong. The known issues aren't to be fixed, they are to be slowly fixed by Govt' contractors ( unless safety is involved, then they pay through the nose to fix lickidy-split ).
Posted by: Yip at October 23, 2013 10:14 AM (/jHWN)
Game on...
Posted by: EC at October 23, 2013 10:15 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Skookumchuk at October 23, 2013 10:15 AM (x4x3r)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 10:15 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 23, 2013 10:16 AM (b1/nQ)
Is that $200 more?
Posted by: EC at October 23, 2013 10:16 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: John Galt at October 23, 2013 10:16 AM (e8kgV)
Just think. This is just the ENROLLMENT they've botched up badly.
Just wait till they are running all the heart by-passes, chemo treatments and liver transplants.
Posted by: fixerupper at October 23, 2013 10:17 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 10:21 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami - GO CARDS !!! at October 23, 2013 10:21 AM (bCEmE)
I just saw an ad for a Glock 24C. I did not know they made this version.
This is the long slide with the ports cut into the barrel. $500 used.
Is this a good deal for a rare pistol?
Posted by: EC at October 23, 2013 10:21 AM (GQ8sn)
Hello, IT. Here are the specifications for the app we want you to develop.
*six months later*
OK, here's the app you requested.
Umm, IT? This app is broken and not what we specified.
Really? Looked good to us but we'll fix it. Just send $5 million our way to cover the costs of correcting our fuckup.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 23, 2013 10:21 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at October 23, 2013 10:21 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Count de Monet at October 23, 2013 10:23 AM (BAS5M)
Posted by: Oschisms at October 23, 2013 10:23 AM (clJza)
Posted by: Chris at October 23, 2013 10:23 AM (aBOfW)
The real problem is that they still want to use the Legacy crap, instead of getting people in to do a Data Migration.
Data is Data.... its just 1's and 0's.... its pulling it from one format into another that 'can' be a challenge.... so you need to go into the project with THAT mindset.... ie... that you are going to pull the legacy data out and get it into a modern format... not figure out some way for your Middleware to access that legacy date, on legacy equipment... in an old format...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 23, 2013 10:26 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at October 23, 2013 10:26 AM (1jQhu)
Posted by: Roy at October 23, 2013 10:26 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Rachel Jenteal at October 23, 2013 10:28 AM (oFCZn)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at October 23, 2013 10:28 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at October 23, 2013 10:29 AM (V3kRK)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at October 23, 2013 10:29 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 10:29 AM (ELdpj)
I attended a Computer Associates/IBM seminar where they discussed trying to figure out how to get young people interested in COBOL/CICS. Both companies pointed out that any young CompSci major should learn both client/server and mainframe and that anyone who did could get a job with either one of them. One thing CA was funding was taking inner city students who had demonstrated an aptitude for programming and completely funding their education with the caveat that they attend a CA mainframe course of study and complete it successfully.
The leap to client server neatly ignored the fact that transaction programming is far more efficient on huge mainframes than client/server farms. COBOL was designed to process business rules. CICS was designed to process transactions. Java and other languages were designed for other things. That does not even address the orders of magnitude in how much difference the efficiency is for storing enormous databases in DB2 or Oracle than in SQL Server, etc.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 23, 2013 10:30 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: Andy at October 23, 2013 10:30 AM (VKMdt)
Posted by: ejo at October 23, 2013 10:30 AM (GXvSO)
Posted by: Bill D. Cat at October 23, 2013 10:30 AM (1jQhu)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 10:31 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: fixerupper at October 23, 2013 02:17 PM (nELVU)
I quit drinking and I'm going to start running today!
Posted by: tangonine at October 23, 2013 10:31 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami - GO CARDS !!! at October 23, 2013 10:31 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at October 23, 2013 02:29 PM (V3kRK)
Yep, have been on many of those projects at Fortune 50 companies.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 23, 2013 10:31 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: blaster at October 23, 2013 10:32 AM (W6bkf)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami - GO CARDS !!! at October 23, 2013 10:32 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 10:33 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 10:33 AM (ujMoa)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 23, 2013 10:33 AM (uf1pv)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at October 23, 2013 10:33 AM (U2UQk)
You'll just die tired.
And sober.
Posted by: eleven at October 23, 2013 02:33 PM (GXZgZ)
And miles and miles from home.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 23, 2013 10:33 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: Levin at October 23, 2013 10:34 AM (Hq48F)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 10:34 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at October 23, 2013 10:35 AM (7ObY1)
I just saw an ad for a Glock 24C. I did not know they made this version.
This is the long slide with the ports cut into the barrel. $500 used.
Is this a good deal for a rare pistol?
Posted by: EC at October 23, 2013 02:21 PM (GQ8sn)
Probably. A buddy of mine has a Glock 17L that was valued at $900.
Posted by: Ed Anger at October 23, 2013 10:35 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at October 23, 2013 10:35 AM (uf1pv)
======
Or worse:
Real Programmers are reluctant to actually edit a program that is close to working. They find it much easier to just patch the binary object code directly, using a wonderful program called SUPERZAP (or its equivalent on non-IBM machines). This works so well that many working programs on IBM systems bear no relation to the original Fortran code. In many cases, the original source code is no longer available. When it comes time to fix a program like this, no manager would even think of sending anything less than a Real Programmer to do the job-- no Quiche Eating structured programmer would even know where to start. This is called "job security"
http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/real.programmers.html
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 23, 2013 10:35 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Registered Voter at October 23, 2013 10:35 AM (nUbHY)
Posted by: "WINDOWS 95" at October 23, 2013 10:35 AM (m/Cr5)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at October 23, 2013 10:35 AM (V3kRK)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 10:35 AM (ELdpj)
I've ordered Secretary Sebelius to continue speaking with the media about the glitches, but in her spare time, she's to polish the turd with greater speed and vigor.
Posted by: Bronco Bama, Preznit Pinnochio at October 23, 2013 10:35 AM (pJF+c)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 10:35 AM (ujMoa)
Your first paragraph is completely. Most data in most Fortune 500 companies is on what you call lagacy mainframes. They support all kinds of applications from Linux to Web servers to traditional DB2/CICS/etc workloads. You can run thousands of Linux guests on one mainframe. I've support mainframes and midrange and find balnket statements such as yours are never accurate about any environment.
I do really enjoy your web site though, everyday!
Posted by: Rob at October 23, 2013 10:36 AM (1mpl9)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 23, 2013 10:36 AM (sByIH)
Contracts are let and maintained and Govt leviathans get to blame inefficiencies on old systems, therefore they ask Congress for moar money! Rinse, cycle, repeat. No one loses except the sanity of the contractors or Govt employees with sense of honor and of course, the tax paying pubes.
Posted by: Yip at October 23, 2013 10:36 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami - GO CARDS !!! at October 23, 2013 10:36 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 10:36 AM (ELdpj)
Well, I'm not sure even bloggers know about it right now. It's literally invisible on Twitter. It's a game xhanger. We just need to spread the word and start publicizing plans.
----------------
Yup. Let everyone know about the ACA calculations website. I stuck a friendly link on my Facebook page, obviously because I merely wanted my friends to be able to plan ahead and figure out how much their new insurance plan was going to cost.
*cough*
Posted by: junior at October 23, 2013 10:37 AM (UWFpX)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at October 23, 2013 10:37 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 10:37 AM (ujMoa)
http://www.pbm.com/~lindahl/real.programmers.html
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 23, 2013 02:35 PM (OtQXp)
You laugh, but, back in the day, my husband managed a group that changed object code on a Fortran geophysical mapping program for which the source was long gone. They would change the object code and submit the job.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 23, 2013 10:37 AM (kXoT0)
In addition IT has more levels of bureaucracy than almost any other department in any organization.
And given that we're talking about IT in government, the level of bureaucracy must be stunningly petrifying to any project.
The clients that use my software range from small mom & pop shops to really big financial institutions, and some banks. The banks are ungodly difficult to work with because of federal privacy laws. The users of the PC's that run the software we write have no rights to do nearly anything on their own PC's!
So.. I can imagine a federal project of the size of Obamacare must have way more people watching compliance with regulations than the actual programmers!
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 23, 2013 10:37 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Bigby's Thumb at October 23, 2013 10:38 AM (q6iGB)
89Holy Sh!t, over at Drudge...Dear Leader spied on Angela Merkel's phone and Merkel is pissed.
Lower das boom on him, Angela!
---
Gott im Himmel... dummkopf.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 23, 2013 10:38 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 10:38 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 10:39 AM (ujMoa)
Posted by: Xander Crews at October 23, 2013 10:39 AM (1NiuW)
Posted by: Levin at October 23, 2013 02:34 PM (Hq48F)
We make it up with volume...
Posted by: CGI at October 23, 2013 10:39 AM (lZBBB)
I blame Baldilocks.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 23, 2013 02:29 PM (SY2Kh)
Lemme guess - she wanted to make it "Juuuust right"?
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at October 23, 2013 10:39 AM (PZ6/M)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 23, 2013 10:39 AM (sByIH)
Our 'betters' in DC are trying to pass the blame buck around so much in regards to 404Care that the blame gets lost. According to the NY Slimes, its not really Sebelius' fault since she was too immersed in the policy and well it was the White House who was keeping tabs on the web development.
http://tinyurl.com/mvdsqsg
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 23, 2013 10:39 AM (2lVGT)
Oh my goodness, are you serious???
Posted by: EC at October 23, 2013 10:39 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: President Barkyskins at October 23, 2013 10:39 AM (Is5ND)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 10:40 AM (ELdpj)
My FiL was a system maintenance guy for a [ large recognizable hospital group near San Fran ]. Their software was a custom job that didn't USE a modern database. It was all written using BTrees.
Posted by: bonhomme at October 23, 2013 02:36 PM (sByIH)
I never said it was inaccessible, our WebSphere guys and gals access it every damn day. But, the data is generated by enormous COBOL/CICS systems on DB2 databases. My only point, which usually gets missed is that COBOL/CICS is far from dead and the so called "death of the mainframe" has not happened, nor is it likely to do so.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 23, 2013 10:40 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: Darkmage at October 23, 2013 10:41 AM (T5FtP)
Posted by: Cobalt Shiva at October 23, 2013 10:41 AM (OY/SZ)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 10:42 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 10:42 AM (ujMoa)
None of this applies to the 0Care website. Its not converting some ancient database, its creating a new one from scratch.
The root cause is that JavaScript is shit and they poured it on thick.
Posted by: Hullbreach in the Funboat at October 23, 2013 10:43 AM (UNG+c)
130Lauren -
That's insane.
---
And you wondered why they wanted the true cost of this piece of shit hidden by the amount of the subsidy.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 23, 2013 10:43 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: mama winger at October 23, 2013 10:43 AM (P6QsQ)
It'll take at least that long just to decide where everyone involved with the problem is going to sit
Posted by: kbdabear at October 23, 2013 10:44 AM (aTXUx)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 10:44 AM (ELdpj)
The link is really my first and only blog post since 2008, so I doubt I'm dipping into the regular blogging pool, but allows me to contribute something to the common pool of knowledge about what's likely happening behind the scenes.
Posted by: Jazz at October 23, 2013 10:44 AM (roO4n)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 23, 2013 10:44 AM (2lVGT)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 23, 2013 10:44 AM (b1/nQ)
If I get Health Insurance I will have to sleep in the woods. The policy is still unlikely to pay for anything.
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 10:45 AM (ujMoa)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 23, 2013 10:45 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Paid for by Citizens for Clyde the Orangutan at October 23, 2013 10:45 AM (QF8uk)
I think that's kind of the point.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 23, 2013 10:45 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 23, 2013 10:46 AM (b1/nQ)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 23, 2013 02:37 PM (kXoT0)
======
Oh, I believe it all right- "back in the day" when I worked on systems for the gov't we had systems software that had been "hand changed" to the point that nobody knew what the source would have looked like, but it worked.
We also fixed software problems by switching memory boards around in the system chassis, but that is another story...
Posted by: Nighthawk at October 23, 2013 10:46 AM (OtQXp)
Brilliant.
Posted by: mama winger at October 23, 2013 10:46 AM (P6QsQ)
And you wondered why they wanted the true cost of this piece of shit hidden by the amount of the subsidy.
And this is what I hope will sink the entire fiasco.
Along with the vague remembrances of the LIV's of things like, "If you like your plan/doctor, you can keep it" and "Your premiums will go down 3000%."
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at October 23, 2013 10:46 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 23, 2013 10:46 AM (sByIH)
Posted by: Adam B at October 23, 2013 10:46 AM (MQpNQ)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 23, 2013 10:47 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars [/i] [/b] [/s] at October 23, 2013 10:47 AM (euHp0)
http://tinyurl.com/mfbqgfr
Way to go, Obama!
Posted by: Tami - GO CARDS !!! at October 23, 2013 02:36 PM (bCEmE)
It's all part of the plan. If you take a completely objectionable look at everything obama's done/is doing, it becomes clear that he is trying to destroy this country. He hates America. He was raised by rabid American hating people. Michelle hates America. Valerie the Iranian hates America. The left hates America. What else can you expect of an Alinski, Cloward/Piven, community organizer?
Posted by: Havedash at October 23, 2013 10:47 AM (BRhGr)
Pardon my language. But shit it is.
Posted by: mama winger at October 23, 2013 10:47 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 23, 2013 10:48 AM (b1/nQ)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 23, 2013 10:48 AM (sByIH)
Posted by: Monty at October 23, 2013 10:48 AM (G8OwX)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 10:49 AM (ujMoa)
I'm going long on Doom.
And pixelated Mongolian tentacle pron.
Posted by: dananjcon at October 23, 2013 10:49 AM (wmU4G)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 23, 2013 10:50 AM (b1/nQ)
154The technical problems are the least of our worries in this pile of shit.
Pardon my language. But shit it is.
---
We know it's a piece of shit. They know it's a piece of shit. The fact that it's such a piece of shit is raising the profile of everyone so that they might actually give a shit about it and possibly not step in it.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 23, 2013 10:50 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 23, 2013 10:50 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: moviegique at October 23, 2013 10:50 AM (7zeA4)
162No way is the average person even going to meet their deductible.
I think that's kind of the point.
PONZI!
---
If Ponzi had been a politician instead of an investment guru, he'd have gotten the Congressional Medal of Freedom.
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 23, 2013 10:51 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 10:51 AM (ujMoa)
Posted by: Adam B at October 23, 2013 02:46 PM (MQpNQ)
Fun part is that we really don't know how many of the people who have signed up through the system, actually HAVE Health Insurance.
And THEY don't know either... because it looks like all the site does is submit your info to an insurance carrier.... and that info in many cases is incorrect.
Thus we will have many people, who sign up... think they are covered.... but do not have health insurance...
Key is.... you don't have it until you pay a Bill....
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 23, 2013 10:51 AM (lZBBB)
What they aren't telling you is that you are supporting not just your family, but multiple other families with that deductible.
Which was the whole damn idea all along.
Posted by: EC at October 23, 2013 10:51 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 23, 2013 10:51 AM (DmNpO)
But it is conceived and ordered (moved, seconded, carried, and minuted) in clean, carpeted, warmed and well-lighted offices, by quiet men with white collars and cut fingernails and smooth-shaven cheeks who do not need to raise their voices.
Hence, naturally enough, my symbol for Hell is something like the bureaucracy of a police state or the office of a thoroughly nasty business concern. "
--- C.S. Lewis
Posted by: mama winger at October 23, 2013 10:51 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 23, 2013 10:52 AM (2lVGT)
Of course, as we've known since the beginning, this is merely the prelude to Taxpayer-Gifted Healthcare (f.k.a. single-payer).
Posted by: SFGoth at October 23, 2013 10:52 AM (zaqyi)
Posted by: moviegique at October 23, 2013 10:52 AM (7zeA4)
>>No way is the average person even going to meet their deductible. Money down the toilet.
.
.That has been my point from day one. A Typical family of 4 will never meet their deductible unless someone in that family gets a serious catastrophic illness or is involved in some sort or accident. That only happens to about 1% of the population a year.
Along about May or June, people are going to start to say....hey, why am I still paying out of pocket for this plan?
Posted by: Registered Voter at October 23, 2013 10:52 AM (nUbHY)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 23, 2013 10:52 AM (b1/nQ)
Posted by: RoyalOil at October 23, 2013 10:53 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 02:51 PM (ujMoa)
The lady was dumb, she should have just brandished it and stopped the whole thing. Once you shoot, you'd better be telling a cop your life or someone else's was about to end if you hadn't.
Related: do not buy expensive guns for defensive carry. Most likely, you will never get it back from the cops. Has Zimmerman gotten his back?
Posted by: EC at October 23, 2013 10:53 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Jesse Pinkman, PhD Bitches! at October 23, 2013 10:54 AM (As/N8)
Nope. My rates are $250/hr. Plus travel expenses.
Posted by: John W. at October 23, 2013 10:55 AM (PVBzL)
133 No way is the average person even going to meet their deductible. Money down the toilet.
Correct. Its really too bad that Individual HSA are not allowed to accumulate monies beyond a year. Catastrophic Insurance combined with HSA that allow lifetime savings would have been the way to go when combined with national marketing of insurance. Imagine having a HSA with $50K in it and then shopping for a high deductible Cat policy.
Posted by: Chaos, it the other dark meat at October 23, 2013 10:55 AM (oDCMR)
Posted by: Registered Voter at October 23, 2013 02:52 PM (nUbHY)
Yup. 95% of the time it'll be like having car insurance with a deductible equal to the value of the car. In other words: none.
Posted by: tangonine at October 23, 2013 10:55 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 10:55 AM (ujMoa)
IBM's rule of thumb, proven by years of experience, is that ~12 bugs per thousand lines of code will be discovered once that code enters system/integration testing. A few more will be encountered in the field after release.
Obamacare is clearly not even ready for that stage of testing, so we could expect to see a minimum of ((500M/1,000)*12) bugs yet to be discovered.
500M / 1,000 = 500,000
500,000 * 12 = 6M bugs
Fixing even 50,000 bugs is a herculean task that would take hundreds of programmers several years.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 23, 2013 10:55 AM (l5zzX)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at October 23, 2013 10:56 AM (bb5+k)
http://tinyurl.com/llt5l4v
My name is....Evinrude.
Posted by: EC at October 23, 2013 10:56 AM (GQ8sn)
OK, code monkeys, I gotta give the laptop to B'Gal for the day.
Y'all have fun and try not to trash the place, 'k?
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at October 23, 2013 10:56 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: John W. at October 23, 2013 02:55 PM (PVBzL)
Better add a zero to that number if you are gonna get involved with this fluster cluck.
Posted by: tcn at October 23, 2013 10:56 AM (3kDQa)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 10:56 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: moviegique at October 23, 2013 02:50 PM (7zeA4)
The numbers don't add up.... because this is nothing more than a cost shift from Government, to the Insurance payer...
We spend on average $8500 a year on Health care as a Nation. 30% of healthcare costs come in the last year of Life... which is mainly Medicare folks.
The Government does not have the money to fully fund those costs.... so they are trying to get the Medical industry to cost shift to 'Healthy' clients... ie... they will charge more to the insurance companies of younger regular insurance folks than they will charge for the same thing for the elderly.
Thus, HEALTHY folks will be paying more than what the pool of healthy folks should, so the entire Health industry can survive.
Which is why you are seeing Health insurance rates, HIGHER than the average cost of healthcare for healthy people.
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 23, 2013 10:56 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at October 23, 2013 10:56 AM (dfYL9)
181 "... all the programmers who wrote that stuff [COBOL] retired years ago."
COBOLers are around for $50/hr.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at October 23, 2013 10:57 AM (Z5KPR)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at October 23, 2013 10:57 AM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 02:56 PM (ELdpj)
--------------
I am so truly and sincerely sorry.
Posted by: mama winger at October 23, 2013 10:58 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 23, 2013 10:59 AM (sByIH)
In Washington, White House spokesman Jay Carney said "the United States is not monitoring and will not monitor the communications of the chancellor."
is not.. will not..
notice he didn't say "has not"?
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at October 23, 2013 10:59 AM (f9c2L)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 10:59 AM (ujMoa)
wonder what the going rate for 370 assembler programmers in these days?
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 23, 2013 11:00 AM (l5zzX)
I'm doing great, phoenixgirl! Sadly, no more vacation trips to AZ for me though. We moved my folks back to the area last month, after them being out in Tucson for the past 20 years. Health issues necessitating the need for them to be closer to family again.
So there goes my tan.
Posted by: mama winger at October 23, 2013 11:00 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 11:00 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 11:01 AM (ujMoa)
Posted by: sound awake at October 23, 2013 11:01 AM (pk/NG)
Posted by: Adam B at October 23, 2013 11:01 AM (MQpNQ)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 02:56 PM (ELdpj)
Note.... add premium, plus out of pocket total... and you get $17,900.... which is just a bit above the average healthcare cost of $8500... for 2 people...
Which tells me THEY expect there to be a LOT of Uncovered people out there...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 23, 2013 11:01 AM (lZBBB)
wonder what the going rate for 370 assembler programmers in these days?
Posted by: Purp at October 23, 2013 03:00 PM (l5zzX)
You should pimp yourself with cut rates to get hired on with an outfit that is trying to salvage the website and db. Once you're in, then have fun!
*evil grin*
Posted by: EC at October 23, 2013 11:01 AM (GQ8sn)
190 Here's a the plan that most closely resembles what we currently have. We currently pay $550/month.
Deductible $1,500
Coinsurance 20%
Out of Pocket Maximum $3,500
More Details
Monthly Cost
$1,101.81
Premium: $1,241.36
Subsidy: $139.54
It meets the "ever so slightly less than our house payment" criteria, so there's that. Seriously, I'd laugh it it weren't actually happening to me.
Why don't you contact Candy Crowley with this info. I'm sure she would want to do a human interest story, especially one that makes Obama a liar. At $13,200/yr, it would be best to self insure and pay the premium to yourself. How much equity do you have in your house? You could set up a Line Of Credit for real emergencies while investing $13K/yr in British Pounds or real estate or ammo.
Posted by: Chaos, it the other dark meat at October 23, 2013 11:02 AM (oDCMR)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 23, 2013 11:02 AM (2lVGT)
Posted by: Jazz at October 23, 2013 11:02 AM (roO4n)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 23, 2013 11:02 AM (b1/nQ)
Posted by: ADK46er at October 23, 2013 11:03 AM (fHU+s)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 11:03 AM (ujMoa)
206 Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 02:56 PM (ELdpj)
Note.... add premium, plus out of pocket total... and you get $17,900.... which is just a bit above the average healthcare cost of $8500... for 2 people...
Which tells me THEY expect there to be a LOT of Uncovered people out there...
Reminds me of Social Security setting the age of retirement to the average age of death. FDR was a compassionate man.
Posted by: Chaos, it the other dark meat at October 23, 2013 11:03 AM (oDCMR)
No, for some reason I forgot that she's half Kenyan, not Nigerian. Bad joke on my part.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 23, 2013 11:04 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 23, 2013 11:04 AM (IXrOn)
Lower das boom on him, Angela!
**
Heh...Barack Obama, Making friends and influencing the next cold war.
Posted by: dananjcon at October 23, 2013 11:04 AM (wmU4G)
Add in Britain and Canada to the list.
Posted by: EC at October 23, 2013 11:04 AM (GQ8sn)
Geez.
Posted by: Jazz at October 23, 2013 11:05 AM (roO4n)
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 23, 2013 11:05 AM (m6P+7)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 23, 2013 11:05 AM (DmNpO)
they will use this to say we tried and it doesnt work its too hard to coordinate all this stuff between the private sector and the government so the government is just going to do it all now
just sit back and watch this is all theater its all contrived
Posted by: sound awake at October 23, 2013 03:01 PM (pk/NG)
Absolutely! And Rubio, McCain, Graham, Boehner, et all will be marching along in lockstep.
Posted by: Havedash at October 23, 2013 11:05 AM (BRhGr)
Geez.
Posted by: Jazz at October 23, 2013 03:05 PM (roO4n)
Ampersands are only available to Platinum Level members.
Posted by: EC at October 23, 2013 11:05 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Boss Moss the Redskin Savage at October 23, 2013 11:06 AM (ujMoa)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at October 23, 2013 11:06 AM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 11:07 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b] at October 23, 2013 11:07 AM (sByIH)
Posted by: Yip at October 23, 2013 11:07 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 23, 2013 11:07 AM (b1/nQ)
Add in Britain and Canada to the list.
Posted by: EC at October 23, 2013 03:04 PM (GQ8sn)
And a Grenade that went through Fast and Furious, was just found in Mexico, at the site of the triple homicide by Cartel members..
Mexico?.... check...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 23, 2013 11:07 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 23, 2013 11:07 AM (2lVGT)
BCBS Choice Silver PPO 003 TX for myself and 4 teens:
(all amounts in network)
Indiv Deduct $6,000
Family Deduct $12,700
Coinsurance $0
Out of Pocket Max (Indiv) $6,000 (Fam = Not Available)
Primary Care / Specialist Office Visit $0 CoPay
In Patient Hosp Services $250 CoPay (I guess that's each time one steps through the doorway)
ER Services $500 CoPay
Labs/X-Ray/Diagnostics $0 CoPay
Generic Rx $0 CoPay
Preferred Brand Name Rx $50 CoPay
Non Preferred Brand Name Rx $100 CoPay
Specialty Drugs Rx $150 CoPay
Full Premium $1,060
Subsidy $565 (Thanks, US Taxpayers!)
My Monthly Cost $495
My God! It's full of stupid. The maths will never ever ever never ever work.
Posted by: Count de Monet at October 23, 2013 11:08 AM (BAS5M)
~20 lines of fully documented tested code/day by the time a product shipped.
That was on average. Rockstars would beat that by 10x or more. The slugs might be lucky to crank out 10 lines that worked.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 23, 2013 11:08 AM (l5zzX)
Posted by: DDR Barkster at October 23, 2013 11:08 AM (m6P+7)
Posted by: RWC - OCare Team Leader at October 23, 2013 11:09 AM (fWAjv)
Whatever you do, don't let anyone from "our side" help out in fixing this CF - we want it gone, we didn't vote for it, let their side own it completely.
Right-wing programmers who work on this are the equivalent of people digging their own graves right before the people making them dig put a bullet in the back of their head.
Obama owns this - it's his signature piece of legislation; his legacy.
Like everything else he touches, it's turning to shit.
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX at October 23, 2013 11:09 AM (PZ6/M)
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 23, 2013 03:05 PM (m6P+7)
To me, it was very telling that al-obama was oh so hot for him some Mo-Bros in Egypt, al-qaeda in Syria, etc., but totally refused to support the green revolution in Iran in any way. Seriously, what does that say? "The most beautiful sound he ever heard was the muslim call to prayer".
Posted by: Havedash at October 23, 2013 11:09 AM (BRhGr)
I don't buy expensive guns for concealed carry simply because mine tend to get all banged up. Or in the case of my Kel Tec, accidentally spilling salt on it with predictable results.
I'd be pissed if I scratched up an $800 H&K. A $370 Kahr or $230 Kel Tec- not so much.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at October 23, 2013 11:10 AM (SY2Kh)
230 "Chaos, it the other dark meat at October 23, 2013 03:02 PM "
I wish we could. Unfortunately, my husband has an auto immune disease so we're forced to buy insurance of some sort. Our only alternative is to do Samaritan Ministries. That might be an issue because we're heathens who don't ever go to church...
What's funny is that we're just the people who Obama DOESN'T want on his plan. *laughs maniacally* *sobs*
------
Lauren, I am sorry for your situation. May I ask how much does his condition cost per year to treat?
Posted by: Chaos, it the other dark meat at October 23, 2013 11:10 AM (oDCMR)
----------------
I don't think the Samaritan did either, Lauren.
Just sayin'.
Praying for you and your family. I have an auto immune disease myself. So I know how it is. {{{ hugs }}}
Posted by: mama winger at October 23, 2013 11:10 AM (P6QsQ)
For me here in NH -- 34 year old non-smoker -- the cheapest bronze plan I can get is this one:
Premium: 215.40/month (153.89 with a subsidy)
Deductible (Individual) $5,500
Deductible (Family) $11,000
Coinsurance $0
Out of Pocket Maximum (Individual) $6,350
Out of Pocket Maximum (Family) $12,700
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 23, 2013 11:11 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: isophorone at October 23, 2013 11:13 AM (THdRg)
Posted by: wth at October 23, 2013 11:15 AM (wAQA5)
Posted by: tully sempronicus at October 23, 2013 11:16 AM (lB/5N)
Posted by: toby928© at October 23, 2013 11:16 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 11:18 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at October 23, 2013 11:22 AM (bb5+k)
FU, AMPERSAND!!!
Posted by: Jazz at October 23, 2013 11:24 AM (roO4n)
The issues with the Obomacare system are only a visable aspect of the challanges in working with Federal IT programs. I have been involved, to a greater or lesser degree with a few and the Obomacare is NOT the worst. It has all the earmarks of bad, but if you wan to see real institutional anarchy and failing to see reality look at the DFAC's push to replace the military HR and Payroll sytems with SAP. This has been going on for about 20 years with still no closure, to the best of my knowledge. I do not want to think how much money has gone down that rathole. Selecting the product first is always a bit of a challange
However, the Obomacare project does have the earmarks of the classis 'it will not be allowed to fail' project, which will just suck more and more resource. I am likely kidding myselft to think that someone in 'managment' will step back and look at other options. Given that this is LAW - yikes- I am not sure there are any other options.
Al
Posted by: havancourt at October 23, 2013 11:25 AM (Al9g7)
**
We're just happy to be right-side up.
Posted by: Guam at October 23, 2013 11:35 AM (wmU4G)
NH plans are actually close to real plans, minus the deductible. I think we're one of the only two states that have plans in the exchange that aren't insane per that list of average rate increases on NPR.
Posted by: Gaff at October 23, 2013 11:37 AM (jyzMD)
It varies based on what meds he's put on. Right now meds alone are about $500 (without insurance, but we pay more like $200) and he has a specialist visit and blood draws every other month. That would be doable, but if he moves onto Humira or Embrel, then the monthly med cost would sky rocket to about $1800/month, and that's a very likely scenario because right now his condition isn't well controlled.
My basic calculation is that you are experiencing at a minimum $7,800 per year Med costs with possible spikes to $16,800. The policy you quoted as coming nearest to your current policy will cost $13,800/year. In this analysis I assumed you would spend $500/month on medicine instead of $200. So it really boils down to you spending $13.8K to insure $3,000 of cost above your annual premium. I don't know if this is a good deal or not. Notice that I did not calculate co-pays and deductibles. Clearly it would make some sense if your husband's condition will deteriorate, but if this is the worst of it, a self insuring path may make sense. Your real risk is between $7.8 and $16.8 annually provided you have no other med expenses. Should you run two years at $7.8k costs sans Insurance and saved the remaining premium, you would have a self insurance account worth $12k earning interest.
Posted by: Chaos, it the other dark meat at October 23, 2013 11:40 AM (oDCMR)
Posted by: Lloyd Loar at October 23, 2013 11:43 AM (9u2hL)
Posted by: Lauren at October 23, 2013 11:47 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: nadavegan at October 23, 2013 11:51 AM (g84Si)
Posted by: Shoey at October 23, 2013 11:54 AM (jdOk/)
266 Thanks, Chaos. That's the sort of calculations I've been doing. The risk is that he is almost certainly going to need multiple joint replacements. When? Could be next month, could be 10 years. It just depends on how well he responds to the disease modifying drugs and if we can get him into remission. So many variables, it is hard to plan.
-----
In the old days (prior to Obama) Cat plans were actually cheap and were cheaper with higher deductibles. Today you are forced to select from overpriced Cat plans due to Obama legislating mandatory coverage with community risk rating (age and sex). The other element that was distorted was MED IRAs being capped and not allowing savers to actually save their Med money but rather being forced by imminent Fed seizure to spend them all at the end of each year. The Dems have been fighting individual rights relative to Medical Care for some time. Now you know why.
Posted by: Chaos, it the other dark meat at October 23, 2013 12:03 PM (oDCMR)
Posted by: Blake at October 23, 2013 12:07 PM (WuGBT)
Posted by: Jean at October 23, 2013 12:10 PM (CMlD4)
Posted by: toby928© at October 23, 2013 12:12 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at October 23, 2013 12:14 PM (1hM1d)
Posted by: xanderphife at October 23, 2013 12:20 PM (3ePq6)
Posted by: Anchovy at October 23, 2013 12:21 PM (MNxW+)
Posted by: Jean at October 23, 2013 12:22 PM (CMlD4)
Posted by: Jean at October 23, 2013 12:27 PM (CMlD4)
Posted by: sound awake at October 23, 2013 12:34 PM (pk/NG)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at October 23, 2013 12:34 PM (vd7A8)
Posted by: sound awake at October 23, 2013 12:40 PM (pk/NG)
Posted by: Man of La Mancha at October 23, 2013 01:08 PM (VHIqP)
A mainframe system programmer.
Posted by: Andy at October 23, 2013 01:30 PM (8tBkt)
Game on...
Posted by: EC at October 23, 2013 02:15 PM (GQ8sn)
I think the President has done enough already, don't you?
Posted by: Robert Ellsworth at October 23, 2013 01:48 PM (FxAgj)
Bloomberg News
FBI's computer update a case study of errors
By: Laurence Arnold
'They made all the classic mistakes,' UC-Irvine prof says
The Federal Bureau of Investigation's three-year, $170 million effort to modernize its computer system has become a case study in all that can go wrong. The bureau's second attempt will test whether it learned from experience.
In one college classroom, the failed bid by the bureau and its contractor, Science Applications International Corp., to make millions of investigation files accessible in the bureau's computer system is presented as an example of a "spectacular" failure of an information-technology project.
"They made all the classic mistakes," said Susan Elliott Sim, an assistant professor at the Donald Bren School of Information and Computer Sciences, part of the University of California at Irvine.
Of the $170 million the FBI spent on the project it abandoned in April, about $105 million was lost on services and equipment that can't be reused, FBI Director Robert Mueller told a Senate appropriations subcommittee in February. Last month, he told the same subcommittee that the bureau would avoid repeating its mistakes in its next effort, dubbed Sentinel.
'Money down the drain'
"Our effort to enhance our information technology during the past several years has provided us with much-improved understanding of program management, as well as technical expertise," Mueller said.
Mueller declined to discuss a price estimate for Sentinel.
Sen. Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, said lawmakers want to make sure "this is not money down the drain like the last time."
....
http://tinyurl.com/n2266vu
Posted by: theBuckWheat at October 23, 2013 01:59 PM (siI12)
Posted by: Cobalt Shiva at October 23, 2013 05:26 PM (OY/SZ)
Posted by: 2soonold2latesmart at October 23, 2013 09:00 PM (E7HkV)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2834 seconds, 412 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at October 23, 2013 10:02 AM (0HooB)