March 14, 2013
— Gabriel Malor Happy Thursday.
Big news in the Aaron Swartz case. The defense says that one of the prosecutors withheld exculpatory evidence.
Updates from the smartphone wars: reports of BlackBerry's demise appear to have been premature, Samsung is still riding high on the Galaxy line, and Apple is chugging along. My Galaxy S II is great, but I'm liking the rumors I'm hearing about next month's Galaxy S IV.
WaPo takes a swing at the White House for "bureaucratic hostage-taking" with its sequester hysteria.
I will be at CPAC today and for the next few days. Look for instant commentary at my twitter feed and I'll probably have some longer pieces for the main page here. CPAC's schedule and list of speakers looks about how you would expect. The HQ was nominated for Blog of the Year; the other nominees are Campaign Spot, Twitchy, The Other McCain, Legal Insurrection, and Hot Air, so we're in good company.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:52 AM
| Comments (358)
Post contains 163 words, total size 1 kb.
http://is.gd/Gf5jbK
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:53 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/lR1BGO
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:53 AM (53z96)
And hereÂ’s what the Republican Gov of Michigan says:
"Immigrants are innovators, entrepreneurs, they're making things happen. They create jobs," said Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, a Republican, at an immigration conference in his state last week. Saying Michigan should be a top destination for legal immigrants to come and boost Detroit and other struggling areas, Snyder made a special appeal: "Please come here."
Actually 75% of them who come up from Mexico are just new members of the FSA who will be solid Democrats. The Republican Party is officially shit.
http://is.gd/SU0Ezf
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:53 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/rxs5Td
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:54 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/wi5ZjW
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:54 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/n8GAcp
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:54 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/cuA0kc
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:55 AM (53z96)
They think this should be the bellwether because the House side of this panel has Trey Gowdy on it. They also think the people in SC support amnesty. They are insane or simply liars. There could be one good thing, Graham could get his ass booted out.
http://is.gd/YHl4gM
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:55 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/bvDwXc
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:55 AM (53z96)
Lets see if he holds to that. If you are going to be a Catholic it stands to reason you should follow the ChurchÂ’s teachings. If not, be something else.
http://is.gd/wcTN66
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:55 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/ZdG02P
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:56 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/ebKEse
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:56 AM (53z96)
Punishable by death.
Then again, I advocate the use of the death penalty for parking tickets....
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 02:56 AM (sbV1u)
http://is.gd/hIJvaJ
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:57 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/hzodES
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:57 AM (53z96)
And thatÂ’s it for Thursday, March 14, 2013.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:57 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Groucho Marx [/i] at March 14, 2013 02:58 AM (feFL6)
2 Feinscrunt says she is ready to ban guns now but needs help.
I have to say I agree with her. Indeed she does "need help". I would suggest of the pyschiatric kind.
Posted by: Molly k. at March 14, 2013 02:58 AM (D3Gkk)
I think he will, Vic. He's not American so he probably has a spine.
.....
Remember the days when the very definition of "American" was that you had a spine?
Good times. Good times.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 02:59 AM (sbV1u)
Not familiar with this case but it seems to me that this is becoming common. When are these shit-hole judges going to start punishing the lawyers instead of the citizens for this?
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:59 AM (53z96)
The Samsung Galaxy Tab-2 is the best one out there. Got one for my wife, she doesn't use the phone, just all the other stuff.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 03:00 AM (53z96)
13 MSNBC boots Schultz to weekends only. Will anyone notice?
I know one lady who will. I had a client once that told me she thought he should run for president. He was sooooooo smart and had so many good ideas. Gag. I could never look at her the same after that.
Posted by: Molly k. at March 14, 2013 03:01 AM (D3Gkk)
So,.....what fresh hell hath we been brought today?
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 14, 2013 03:02 AM (iZP3p)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at March 14, 2013 03:03 AM (feFL6)
http://thepiratebay.se/search/BBC/0/99/0
Posted by: @PurpAv at March 14, 2013 03:04 AM (CAH/B)
Posted by: Ashley J. Soopergenus at March 14, 2013 03:05 AM (iZP3p)
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 03:06 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/lR1BGO
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 06:53 AM (53z96)
========
THIS!
One of the most infuriating things about our culture is that we have allowed the Marxists to re-define the words in our vocabulary. From the (admittedly small) amount of research I've done on Pope Francis I'm sure that when he says "social justice" it means what it is supposed to mean and not what the Marxists have perverted it into.
Also, I'm glad he took the name "Francis" and not the name of his order's founder. "Pope Frank" I can handle, but I don't think the world is quite ready for "Pope Iggy".
Oh, and good morning all!
Posted by: Nighthawk at March 14, 2013 03:08 AM (RSqz2)
I don't know that there has ever been a formal declaration. I do know the conditions under which a war could be called "just" by the CC. The bulk of the doctrine comes from St. Augustine.
And....most of the Crusades would NOT fit the definition of a just war.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 03:09 AM (sbV1u)
Swartz was charged in two separate indictments with attempting to steal millions of journal articles from the nonprofit website JSTOR, for the purpose of disseminating them freely. Heymann initially charged Swartz with several felonies that could have led to many years in prison, and offered a plea bargain whereby Swartz would spend less than a year in prison.
Typical overcharge BS. And he committed suicide.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 03:10 AM (53z96)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 14, 2013 03:10 AM (d0Dmj)
Sucks to be him but that's what the idiots who live in Newark, Hoboken, Jersey City, etc. have decided the regime they will live under.
Move to western Jersey or eastern PA.
Posted by: General Woundwort at March 14, 2013 03:10 AM (RrD4h)
Reddit founder. He hoovered a bunch of shit off JSTORS and released it. The govt prosecuted for hacking.
Sad thing is the shit he hoovered, the govt JUST NOW decided shouldn't be behind a paywall anyway since it was research done with public funds.
Posted by: @PurpAv at March 14, 2013 03:11 AM (CAH/B)
In the document, Peters argues that Heymann withheld exculpatory evidence. At issue was whether the federal government had properly obtained a warrant to search Swartz' computer and thumb drive. Peters argued that the government failed by waiting more than a month to obtain the warrant. Heymann countered that he couldn't get a warrant because he didn't have access to the equipment. But an email in Heymann's possession, which was written to Heymann himself, showed that assertion to be untrue.
----
Now I'm no lawyer, but how is failing to get a warrant exculpatory? It shows illegal search and seizure and makes the evidence found inadmissable, but acutally releiving Swartz of guilt? Really?
Posted by: Darth Randall at March 14, 2013 03:11 AM (lxc0s)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at March 14, 2013 03:13 AM (feFL6)
Courts are NOT about guilt or innocence in any absolute sense. You don't get justice in courtrooms, you get PROCESS.
Posted by: @PurpAv at March 14, 2013 03:14 AM (CAH/B)
Posted by: Darth Randall at March 14, 2013 07:11 AM (lxc0s)
That is exactly how Bill Ayers got off the charges he had against him. Long time court policy to punish the citizens for police misconduct. You allow criminals to go free and the cops who violated the law walk.
Except in this case it appears the only criminals were the cops.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 03:15 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 14, 2013 03:15 AM (vEVry)
Posted by: Opus An Arcus at March 14, 2013 03:15 AM (UdBxw)
Posted by: RondinellaMamma at March 14, 2013 03:16 AM (53riN)
Posted by: Regular Moron at March 14, 2013 07:13 AM (feFL6)
That war is the furthest from a "just war" of any that this country has ever been in.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 03:16 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 14, 2013 03:16 AM (kEj+5)
Posted by: Thorvald at March 14, 2013 03:16 AM (1V6Pv)
Here are the principles (below). I would guess - and this is only a guess - that the Civil War would indeed qualify.
Except for that last point below. (I'm looking at you Gen. Sherman...)
- A just war can only be waged as a last resort. All non-violent options must be exhausted before the use of force can be justified.
- A war is just only if it is waged by a legitimate authority. Even just causes cannot be served by actions taken by individuals or groups who do not constitute an authority sanctioned by whatever the society and outsiders to the society deem legitimate.
- A just war can only be fought to redress a wrong suffered. For example, self-defense against an armed attack is always considered to be a just cause (although the justice of the cause is not sufficient). Further, a just war can only be fought with "right" intentions: the only permissible objective of a just war is to redress the injury.
- A war can only be just if it is fought with a reasonable chance of success. Deaths and injury incurred in a hopeless cause are not morally justifiable.
- The ultimate goal of a just war is to re-establish peace. More specifically, the peace established after the war must be preferable to the peace that would have prevailed if the war had not been fought.
- The violence used in the war must be proportional to the injury suffered. States are prohibited from using force not necessary to attain the limited objective of addressing the injury suffered.
- The weapons used in war must discriminate between combatants and non-combatants. Civilians are never permissible targets of war, and every effort must be taken to avoid killing civilians. The deaths of civilians are justified only if they are unavoidable victims of a deliberate attack on a military target.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 03:18 AM (sbV1u)
Good morning, fellow Morons. Thanks for the morning briefing, Gabe and Vic.
HereÂ’s a story about the 1944 Judy Garland movie Meet Me in St. Louis:
Because the movie is set in 1903, the songwriters Hugh Martin and Ralph Blaine wanted their music to catch the excitement of the World’s Fair. One day, in search of an idea, Martin went to the Beverly Hills public library to trawl through their collection of period newspapers and magazines. In one paper he found an advertisement for the popular Red Line, with a picture of a double-decker trolley trundling above the caption CLANG, CLANG, CLANG, HERE COMES THE TROLLEY. Rushing back to the studio, Martin told Blaine, “I’ve got it! ‘Clang, clang, clang, went the trolley!” The two of them finished the song in ten minutes, then rushed it over to Garland and producer Arthur Freed, who both loved it.
Garland learned the song almost instantly, but in the rush to record, she flubbed the lyrics, singing “buzz, buzz, buzz” instead of “bump, bump, bump” on the first take. It didn’t matter. Garland had sung with such excitement and spirit that music supervisor Roger Edens shouted, “That’s it! Print it!”
Both Martin and Blaine protested that Garland had sung the wrong words. “Who’ll know?” said Edens. “She’ll just have to learn it wrong and sing it that way when we shoot so she’ll be in sync.” And, of course, nobody noticed – except forever after, Garland had to sing the wrong lyrics for The Trolley Song.
And thatÂ’s it for me. Hope you all have a wonderful day.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at March 14, 2013 03:19 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 14, 2013 03:19 AM (d0Dmj)
One of my favorite movies all because of that song.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 03:20 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Mr Pink at March 14, 2013 03:20 AM (mO1DF)
The First Crusade was justified. The Second most emphatically was not, (and St. Bernard regretted preaching for it until the day he died) the rest are open to various points of debate.
See post #52. Most of the Crusades fail on one or more of these points.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 03:21 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Opus An Arcus at March 14, 2013 03:23 AM (UdBxw)
Posted by: Thorvald at March 14, 2013 03:24 AM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 14, 2013 03:24 AM (d0Dmj)
Fen's Law: Liberals don't believe any of the shit they preach.
None of them have the courage of their convictions. Because if they did, they'd all go hang themselves with fair trade hemp rope....to save Gaia.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 03:25 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Dr Foistus at March 14, 2013 03:25 AM (+kznc)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 14, 2013 03:26 AM (8sCoq)
Laurie Dhue hosted "On the Record" last night on Blaze TV. I just wrote a lengthy review (stunner) of it, hit "enter," and got the "your message has been rejected B.S."
Posted by: RushBabe at March 14, 2013 03:27 AM (tQHzJ)
Re: On the Record, we could have prevented 9-11 with facial recognition software that had already been developed. NSA employees said 9-11 was a GIFT since it elicited scads of unaccountable funds to them. Many millionaires resulted from our tax dollars.
Posted by: RushBabe at March 14, 2013 03:27 AM (tQHzJ)
Your average NSA employee has the social skills of erg; fortunately they're much better at math.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 14, 2013 03:30 AM (vEVry)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 14, 2013 03:32 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: RondinellaMamma at March 14, 2013 03:33 AM (53riN)
Typical?
Do you have an "undercarriage" view?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 03:33 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 14, 2013 03:33 AM (pLvWv)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at March 14, 2013 03:35 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 03:36 AM (53z96)
And thatÂ’s it for Thursday, March 14, 2013.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 06:57 AM (53z96)
That's right. We must leave it up to the head Ewok to "accidentally" post links to lesbian porn.
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at March 14, 2013 03:37 AM (Gkhxf)
I think we're talking past each other here.
I'm talking only about Just War theory and how the Crusades fit in to that. In fact, the First Things piece you cite (and I am also a subscriber) exactly supports my point that several (but not all) of the Crusades fail the Just War test.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 03:37 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Mr Pink at March 14, 2013 03:41 AM (mO1DF)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 14, 2013 03:41 AM (8sCoq)
I'm down with that.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 03:44 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: JDTAY at March 14, 2013 03:44 AM (a0nis)
No, it wasn't.
But thank you for playing.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 03:45 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: RondinellaMamma at March 14, 2013 03:45 AM (53riN)
Posted by: History belongs to Victor at March 14, 2013 03:45 AM (kEj+5)
Posted by: Snarky the Bear at March 14, 2013 03:45 AM (/b8+5)
Yeah we are. I can go back to the principles list at #52, and then go to the First Things piece and pick out where they fail. Again, some fail, not all.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 03:47 AM (sbV1u)
That's true. The Southerners had no business trying to take over Federal property in S. Carolina.
It's ok though, it all turned out fine in the end.
Posted by: BurtTC at March 14, 2013 03:47 AM (BeSEI)
The IP itself was *PUBLIC*, anyone could reproduce and distribute it if they had it. It just happened to be behind a noxious paywall.
Just last week the govt decided to eliminate the paywall and make the stuff freely available over the coming year.
Posted by: @PurpAv at March 14, 2013 03:48 AM (CAH/B)
Will there be rapin' and pillagin'? It ain't a war unless there's rapin' and pillagin'
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 03:49 AM (sbV1u)
http://exleftist.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/LD.jpg
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 14, 2013 07:32 AM (8sCoq)
She was most likely showing all that at that time because she was on the sauce. Her contract was not "renewed". She eventually kicked the stuff but has not been back to Fox except for a few limited appearances.
Too bad because she was teh hawt.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 03:49 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 14, 2013 03:50 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 14, 2013 03:50 AM (t7yLL)
Posted by: teej at March 14, 2013 03:50 AM (d4o2E)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2013 03:50 AM (g7q64)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 14, 2013 03:51 AM (8sCoq)
Fine. The nitwit violated a dumb law, then offed himself when they tried to prosecute him.
Only people who deserve sympathy here are the ones who actually cared for him before he decided to commit his evil act.
Posted by: BurtTC at March 14, 2013 03:52 AM (BeSEI)
Yup. Restricting access to taxpayer-funded research is one of the pillars of the global warming scam, although I'm fairly certain Swartz would have recoiled at that implication of what he was doing.
Posted by: Ian S. at March 14, 2013 03:52 AM (OevbG)
Posted by: Dr. Eviler at March 14, 2013 03:52 AM (VtutD)
Posted by: JDTAY at March 14, 2013 03:52 AM (a0nis)
In SC?????
Now????
Hell, it didn't even get that cold here.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 03:52 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at March 14, 2013 03:53 AM (feFL6)
It's located in a basement off a side street in Denton, Texas.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 03:53 AM (sbV1u)
No communion is basically what ex-communication is. One could make a distinction between a formal declaration, and one where a Priest simply refuses someone communion, but yeah. That's it.
Posted by: BurtTC at March 14, 2013 03:54 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 14, 2013 03:55 AM (t7yLL)
Posted by: Mirage at March 14, 2013 03:56 AM (Cyr3J)
Fen's Law: Liberals don't believe any of the shit they preach.
=============
One of the most effective spies the US had during the Cold War was Morris Childs- he was a high level official in the CPUSA who regularly traveled the inner circles of the Politburo to brief Soviet leaders on the activities of the CPUSA and take instructions and money for the Party back to the US.
Childs became disenchanted with the CPUSA when his health failed and they essentially tried to kick him to the curb. When that happened he offered his services as a double agent to the FBI but there was one catch- he was seriously ill and needed expensive treatment, he was also broke. The FBI would pay for his treatment, but how to explain his sudden financial improvement to his comrades in the party?
Childs and his FBI handlers hatched a simple plan: Childs sent out a letter to the CPUSA membership describing his health problems and his financial dilemma and asked for them to donate money for his treatment.
Nobody sent a dime.
The FBI then paid for Childs' treatment at the Mayo Clinic and when he recovered Childs sent a warm heartfelt letter of thanks to all his CPUSA comrades who so "generously contributed" to pay for his treatment. The Party membership bought the story hook, line, and sinker, and Morris Childs went on to be the FBI's man in the Kremlin and in the CPUSA for the next thirty years.
Posted by: Nighthawk at March 14, 2013 03:57 AM (RSqz2)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 07:18 AM (sbV1u)
I would strongly disagree about the Civil War. I think it fails on at least 2 points:
- A just war can only be waged as a last resort.
- A just war can only be fought to redress a wrong suffered.
The war came about because the northern states attempted to force their idea of right and wrong on the southern states, regardless of whether the North was correct or not. The South Carolinians only fired on Fort Sumter when the Union refused to evacuate the fort. The Union was given every opportunity to avoid war, but chose not to.
I'm not sure what wrong the Union suffered that they were trying to redress. It can't be slavery because they allowed it to continue in the border states. That's the whole reason for the wording of the Emancipation Proclamation. Lincoln was worried that an outright ban would drive the Border States into the arms of the South, so he was careful not to ban slavery there. Given the amount of anti-Union activity there had been in those states early on, this was probably a wide decision.
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at March 14, 2013 03:58 AM (Gkhxf)
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 14, 2013 03:58 AM (vEVry)
Weak.
Sebelius, and others like her, should have been excommunicated years ago.
Not a Catholic but if you're going to take a stance, take a stance.
Posted by: teej at March 14, 2013 07:50 AM (d4o2E)
Small steps, teej, small steps. Think of the scowl on Fancy Nancy's face if her priest - or any priest - held the Host back and told her to screw until she gets right with the Church. I suspect most of the Catholic clergy in America are too gutless to do it, but if Francis could find a way to make them refuse Communion to CINOs like her and make that stick, I'd forgive almost any other misstep.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at March 14, 2013 04:00 AM (zF6Iw)
Proof right there that the Soviets were financing all that shit here. So why weren't these people prosecuted for being agents of a hostile foreign power?
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 04:00 AM (53z96)
Nice fiction.
Wish I could stick around for another story, but I gotta go to work...
By the way, the Catholic Church took no formal position on the American Civil War. Which is one reason why, unlike several protestant denominations, it didn't have any problems maintaining itself throughout and after the war ended.
Posted by: BurtTC at March 14, 2013 04:03 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2013 04:04 AM (g7q64)
Just learned last night at the leader meeting for the Cub Scout Pack I help run that the Pack's chartering organization, the school's PTA, will not be renewing the Pack's charter for FY14. The reason given is because of a recommendation by the Virginia State PTA that local PTA boards not expose themselves to "liability."
Of course, our Pack had been chartered by this PTA for years with no problems and no liability concerns (indeed, that's why the PTA carries liability insurance), so this first made me wonder what exactly has changed. And after thirty seconds I had my answer when the Committee Chair started talking about the Scouts policy of "discrimination."
So basically, our Pack has to find a new chartering organization. If we can't, then the Pack dissolves and I get to tell my kids that a bunch of busybodies with tenuous-at-best connections to Scouting thought it more important to force a private organization to prosletyze a political issue to kids than to just let them go camping and have fun as kids.
Posted by: @JohnTant at March 14, 2013 04:04 AM (tVWQB)
If you are going to prosecute, you have to show how you got your information, which is something the American counter-intelligence community was not willing to do.
Posted by: BurtTC at March 14, 2013 04:05 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: Tuco on where "Just War" meets reality at March 14, 2013 04:06 AM (CZCbG)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 14, 2013 04:06 AM (kEj+5)
It can be slavery. The North tried to limit it using peaceful means, but that still left millions in slavery, which could be viewed as an act of war against Americans. Lincoln was maneuvering tactically so as to not make things worse. RINO.
Posted by: pep at March 14, 2013 04:06 AM (YXmuI)
Its funny hearing all these people talking about a Hispanic Pope. There was some blurb last night about a student at college here from Mexico being all excited about it. I don't think they would be all that excited if they actually knew he was a first generation Argentinian whose parents were Italian immigrants.
Posted by: buzzion at March 14, 2013 04:07 AM (GULKT)
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 08:00 AM (53z96)
=======
To answer that question you will need a shovel, and possibly a fire extinguisher, because you will have to dig up J. Edgar Hoover and ask him.
Apparently he thought the intelligence gleaned from the "Solo" (Childs' code name) operation was more valuable than the prosecution of a bunch of Party apparatchiks.
Posted by: Nighthawk at March 14, 2013 04:08 AM (RSqz2)
Simple answer, eliminate the requirements for "Chartering Organizations".
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 04:09 AM (53z96)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2013 04:10 AM (g7q64)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 14, 2013 04:10 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 04:12 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Mirage at March 14, 2013 04:12 AM (Cyr3J)
Reading the FB posts of all my wife's very liberal and non-Catholic friends last night was hilarious.
Their ignorance was staggering. They just assumed that because he was from Latin America that he was all for gay marriage, women priests, and "progress" in the Church. My wife is from the Bay Area and most of these people live and work in Silicon Valley. You would have thought they'd try using Google to find something out about the new Pope.
To them Latin American = oppressed = liberal = thinks just like me!
Can't wait for their posts describing how "crushed" and "disappointed" and "hurt" they are after they find out he's actually a devout Catholic.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 04:13 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at March 14, 2013 04:15 AM (FsUAO)
It doesn't matter if the articles on JSTOR are public domain or not because JSTOR can still charge for access. It's charging you for use of its servers and database software as much or more than for the actual content. Swartz violated the terms of agreement to use JSTORs site, and was doing so with a goal of undermining its business. Furthermore he took advantage of MITs open policy repeatedly despite knowing that his activities were not welcome. Swartz is a prime example of "this is why we can't have nice things".
After reading about the Swartz case, I'm left with pity and disgust for the man. He was obviously a messed up kid who was very smart but was spoiled. Left wingers took a 14 year old and used him while telling him how much smarter than everyone else he was and how much better than everyone else he was. From the reports of Swartz's friends, he was a young man who had no real discipline in life, who didn't understand the way that the world worked, and who floated from one cracked-brain idea to another while at the same time never getting treatment for his very real mental health issues.
Posted by: Colorado Alex at March 14, 2013 04:15 AM (DsPRa)
Perhaps it will be described in the MSM as "growing in office"?
Posted by: pep at March 14, 2013 04:16 AM (YXmuI)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at March 14, 2013 04:17 AM (FsUAO)
Since you seem to have exhausted the puppehs and kittehs line of anti-doom, perhaps you should consider horses as a potential source of tranquil images!
I'm partial to pictures of weasels and honey badgers myself, but that's just me!
Posted by: Hrothgar at March 14, 2013 04:17 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Mirage at March 14, 2013 04:17 AM (Cyr3J)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2013 04:18 AM (g7q64)
Here's another one: http://tinyurl.com/d9j7pge
Now I'll go back to catching up on the comments...
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 14, 2013 04:18 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 14, 2013 04:18 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 14, 2013 04:18 AM (ZshNr)
@Purp and EoJ
NIH rules (and to a lesser extent FDA) have required that information go "open access" (specifically into PubMed) for several years now (I think since the mid 2000s at least maybe earlier.)
You were still allowed to have it on a paid basis for 6months to a year IIRC.
Furthermore, JSTOR is far more than science, there's a lot of stuff up there that definitely qualifies as IP (I think there's even a few short fiction journals on JSTOR.
My problem with Swartz was 2 fold. 1) He had access through his school but felt the need to break into an MIT closet, (which disrupted MIT's operations.)
2) He lied about "civil disobedience." I like Civil disobedience in principle when dealing with unjust laws (these days it's far from that.) But he wanted to render the law unenforceable. Like it or not we're a country of laws, either work to get them changed or live with them, but don't run around trying to render them moot through some form of vigilantism.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 14, 2013 04:18 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at March 14, 2013 04:19 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 14, 2013 04:19 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 14, 2013 04:19 AM (GFM2b)
Posted by: Mirage at March 14, 2013 04:19 AM (Cyr3J)
Posted by: Hrothgar at March 14, 2013 08:17 AM (Cnqmv)
LOL, weasels and honey badgers huh. I'll think about that. As for horses don't too much care for them. They are expensive toys for rich people unless they are working a ranch in the West.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 04:19 AM (53z96)
Both AP and WallStJrnl today quote the prexy of Xavier in Cincinnati, who killed their NCAA rifle team dead on strictly ideological grounds, after the program had produced something like 14 Olympians. Special circle of Hell, he'll burn in.
After the continent's worth of gunpoint conversions they sponsored, it's clearly all about Change for the Jesuits. That and hypocrisy.
There's a dirty secret in that Francis name, no matter what Vatican PR says. No way on earth or in hell would a Jesuit use a Franciscan's name. It's "F.X." for sure.
Posted by: comatus at March 14, 2013 04:20 AM (qaVK+)
>>Nobody sent a dime.
>> ...Morris Childs went on to be the FBI's man in the Kremlin and in the CPUSA for the next thirty years.
Wow, that is some lovely self-hoisting there.
In other news, for sale cheap: 3 kids who become horribly miserable with a simple cold, including throwing up and keeping Mama awake for too much of the last 4 nights.
Posted by: Mama AJ at March 14, 2013 04:22 AM (SUKHu)
Posted by: toby928© presents at March 14, 2013 04:22 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Case at March 14, 2013 04:23 AM (QwurB)
I didn't hear when you told it before.
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2013 08:18 AM (g7q64)
After I first moved here and we enrolled our young daughter in the local elementary school we went to our first PTA meeting.
We sat through 2 hours of discussion of various fund raising projects and volunteers for said projects. I finally raised my hand and asked when we were going to talk about class plans and curriculum.
In a very snotty manner I was told that those would not be discussed that that wasn't the purpose of the PTA. After closing my jaw I said "Looks like things have changed a lot since the 50s" and then walked out.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 04:23 AM (53z96)
Posted by: zsasz at March 14, 2013 04:24 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: blaster at March 14, 2013 04:24 AM (/1U3u)
Jim Carrey said it best in Liar Liar: "STOP BREAKING THE LAW ASSHOLE!!!"
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 14, 2013 04:24 AM (da5Wo)
Hmmmm....banana hammock and a Biretta.
I just had a marketing idea for the South American and Italian markets.
To Kickstarter! Away!
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 04:25 AM (sbV1u)
@MPPP,
To an extent I agree with you. But OTOH, I also see why the church sticks to the whole "it's up to you to decide if you're able to receive communion thing."
Firstly, I'm not sure politics is really where the church needs to be. We lose every time we do that. It's impossible to translate a virtue ethic to a nietzschean world, so we need to focus on building good people not good government. And overt actions like that are going to seen as political more than moral (and thus backfire horribly)
Pelosi's a fucker who doesn't understand even basic theology. But making ruling based on her actions would likely negatively affect people who do understand the theology and disagree with the church on subtle points while still supporting the church's position (and right to that position) in public, but having discussions about it in private.
I'd hate to see people who actually mean well get screwed over because a priest disagreed with their prudential judgment. (Consider if you told Pelosi to fuck off, how long until some libtard priest does the same to Ryan?)
Posted by: tsrblke at March 14, 2013 04:26 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at March 14, 2013 04:26 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 14, 2013 08:18 AM (ZshNr)
As someone on Lileks' comment board noted, isn't it funny how, after all the Catholic-bashing and outright hatred displayed against the new pope, not a single Catholic has beheaded anyone?
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at March 14, 2013 04:27 AM (zF6Iw)
I just had a marketing idea for the South American and Italian markets.
To Kickstarter! Away!
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 08:25 AM (sbV1u)
Filthy Capitalist pig.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 14, 2013 04:27 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at March 14, 2013 04:27 AM (FsUAO)
Not lately. The oligarchy has made sure nobody can avoid being a felon unless they're dead.
Posted by: @PurpAv at March 14, 2013 04:28 AM (CAH/B)
I think I'm going to unplug from FB soon.
It's a perfect storm of ignorance and stupidity.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 04:28 AM (sbV1u)
159 So when someone gets hit with an absolutely ludicrous gun law in the future and is facing 35 years in charges(or 6 months plea deal!) I'm sure you guys won't be singing a different tune.
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at March 14, 2013 08:27 AM (FsUAO)
You don't get to pick and choose which laws to obey. Oh, this is a stupid law, therefor I don't have to do what it says. That ain't how shit works. You break the law, you get punished. If you think the law is stupid, great. Get it changed. But if you don't want to go to jail, don't break the law. It's pretty simple.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 14, 2013 04:29 AM (da5Wo)
http://is.gd/51FuoU
Next we will have Catholic Physics guys with their eyeballs cut out.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 04:29 AM (53z96)
You're in for 15% of the take. I need a marketing guy.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 04:29 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 08:28 AM (sbV1u)
*AHEM*
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 14, 2013 04:30 AM (da5Wo)
Yup. Insty has a good paper on this. The libs have made everything illegal (and in the case of things like VAWA double or triple-illegal) so if they want to punish someone, there's *always* charges that can be brought.
Posted by: Ian S. at March 14, 2013 04:30 AM (OevbG)
Posted by: @PurpAv at March 14, 2013 08:28 AM (CAH/B)
OR a Democrat
FTFY
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 04:30 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Mainah at March 14, 2013 04:30 AM (659DL)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 08:29 AM (sbV1u)
You know....this mud down here isn't too bad.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 14, 2013 04:30 AM (da5Wo)
Jim Carrey said it best in Liar Liar: "STOP BREAKING THE LAW ASSHOLE!!!"
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 14, 2013 08:24 AM (da5Wo)
I liked Orin Kerr's take over at Volokh, which I think is more subtle.
Swartz broke the law pretty obviously. At the very least he needed to be tried for breaking and entering, various charges of unauthorized access and to a lesser extent punished (either criminally or civilly) to the damages to MIT for a) harming their network and b) causing outages.
However, the stacking of crazy charges by the prosecution got a little extreme.
As to HoboJerky, I think it was Popehat who showed that the 35 year shit was bogus based on the Federal Sentencing Guidelines (which are pretty much universally followed.) 35 years IIRC was stacking all the charges up, giving him the max and running them consecutively.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 14, 2013 04:31 AM (GaqMa)
Why would that be?
If God is the author of all truth then there's nothing to worry about.
Frankly, its the fundamentalists who are more anti-science then Catholics.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 04:31 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at March 14, 2013 04:31 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: archie goodwin at March 14, 2013 04:31 AM (Jsiw/)
Present company excepted, of course!
I am spending more time "defriending" these days than "friending"
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 04:32 AM (sbV1u)
That's how shit gets declared unconstitutional. Someone takes the hit and brings the case.
There's a metric fuckton of unconstitutional laws on the books just waiting to be challenged and overturned...but to have standing, you gotta get busted first.
Posted by: @PurpAv at March 14, 2013 04:33 AM (CAH/B)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 14, 2013 04:33 AM (JDIKC)
If God is the author of all truth then there's nothing to worry about.
Frankly, its the fundamentalists who are more anti-science then Catholics.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 08:31 AM (sbV1u)
Think popular novel here OK?
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 04:33 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Al at March 14, 2013 04:33 AM (V70Uh)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at March 14, 2013 08:31 AM (FsUAO)
Yes, I would say the same. The "justness" of a law has nothing to do with the punishment for breaking it. If you break the law you have to be prepared for the consequences. Period. This isn't hard.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 14, 2013 04:33 AM (da5Wo)
Got it.
I missed it the first time.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 04:33 AM (sbV1u)
So the insane amount of years he was staring down the barrel of for pretty minor documents(I could download them from work) is totally cool?
The status of the documents as public domain was relatively unimportant. JSTOR charges for access to its database and server equipment, regardless of whether the material is copyrighted. Swartz lied about agreeing to their terms of use in order to release the end product of their years of work and thousands of dollars of investment, an act which would have caused financial damage to the company. That's fraud with damages that easily exceed the minimum for it to be a felony.
Did the prosecutor try and scare him? Yes, but so what? His job is to represent the interests of the state. This was a negotiation to try and get the best possible agreement without going to trial. Swartz's own lawyers knew that the prosecutor was stating the absolute worst-case scenario and that any likely penalties would be much less. Hell, Swartz himself was smart enough to be able to do a little research and see that federal sentencing guidelines would be far less than the maximums.
Posted by: Colorado Alex at March 14, 2013 04:34 AM (DsPRa)
Posted by: comatus at March 14, 2013 04:34 AM (qaVK+)
That's the spirit!
People like Pelosi go to communion and think, "Cool! Snack time!"
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 04:35 AM (sbV1u)
123 (and youse other guys), I'm involved in a search for another chartering organization. We have to have one because of national/council rules (it's not like the Girl Scouts where anyone can just start up a troop). The idea is to provide good integration of the Scouts with the community.
I'm also trying to figure out if I can just start a non-profit "organization" on paper and charter that way, but the BSA are kind of sticklers on this point.
There are a number of churches and such in the area which might be willing to charter, so we just have to do legwork. There's a point that technically the chartering organization has oversight over the Pack so we just need to find one that is willing to be somewhat laissez-faire.
Interesting point...one of the complaints the PTA presented is that they didn't exercise any real oversight which they said created liability concerns for them. I said anyone from the PTA is welcome at any Scout event/function/meeting at any time to make sure it's being run correctly, to which I was told that no one from the PTA would volunteer for such a role. In other words, they are complaining that they don't have oversight but they aren't willing to provide oversight.
It's a giant piece of political shit.
Interestingly, the actual policy isn't against gays per se, but those who are openly gay. The actual reasoning (also detailed in the policy) is that the Scouts believe parents should be having these conversations with their kids directly instead of the Scouts forcing the issue on them. Put another way, if a gay man wants to be a Scout leader but basically keeps his sexuality to himself, there's no practical prohibition against it. It's when he starts prosletyzing, bringing his "partner" to meetings, etc that the problem is created. So this whole "discrimination" meme is something basically manufactured and didn't seem to be a problem to me to begin with.
Posted by: @JohnTant at March 14, 2013 04:35 AM (tVWQB)
There's a metric fuckton of unconstitutional laws on the books just waiting to be challenged and overturned...but to have standing, you gotta get busted first.
Posted by: @PurpAv at March 14, 2013 08:33 AM (CAH/B)
And that dovetails nicely with what I'm saying. Those people were willing to take the hit. They knowingly broke the law in an effort to get it changed. I got no problem with that. But you have to be willing and prepared for it not to go your way.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 14, 2013 04:35 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at March 14, 2013 04:36 AM (FsUAO)
"class plans and curriculum."
That's the Federal Governments job now. They have been grabbing state and local power away from the people since 1865. See what Mr. Lincoln hast wrought? And his excuse was "To keep the union together", not slavery. Damn, read a book.
Posted by: Case at March 14, 2013 04:36 AM (QwurB)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 14, 2013 04:37 AM (9Bj8R)
John, where are you in VA? I might have an option for you.
Drop me a note. Email in nic.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 04:37 AM (sbV1u)
@Purp,
Fair enough point, but that's a problem we need to fix in and of itself. Of course we failed last time because "Free shit man!" but maybe next time.
@HoboJerky
Context is everything here. I may intentionally break an unjust gun law but I also need to be prepared to face whatever consequences come of that (and use those consequences to highlight the proplems with the law.)
I actually only support 3D printing of guns insofar as it shows the stupidity of the laws they're trying to pass as unenforceable, but still think the primary concern is changing those laws.
Furthermore, it's entirely more vague if the laws Swartz was fighting were "unjust." If he had just been sitting at home downloading some articles and had reached some arbitrary cap, cleared his cookies and gone about working again I'd be more concerned. But he's well outside those bounds and his intent was not entirely pure IMHO.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 14, 2013 04:38 AM (GaqMa)
Jonah Goldberg discusses "Social Justice" in his book "The Tyranny of Cliches'." It's a meaningless term.
Posted by: Al at March 14, 2013 04:38 AM (V70Uh)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 14, 2013 04:39 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at March 14, 2013 04:39 AM (+z4pE)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2013 04:41 AM (g7q64)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 14, 2013 04:41 AM (9Bj8R)
That's because in this country they don't go together and haven't since 1966.
In other parts of the world, they still do.
Jonah Goldberg discusses "Social Justice" in his book "The Tyranny of Cliches'." It's a meaningless term.
As used by liberals these days, yeah, he's right. As used within the RCC, it has a very specific meaning that bears only the faintest resemblance to how political liberals use it.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 04:41 AM (sbV1u)
They talk a good game, but they're cheap mofo's who'll cut you lose in a NY minute if you're facing prison time.
He should have fled to Vietnam or something like that one scraggly looking scandi Pirate Bay dude did. I think he was too young and idealistic to realize he had other options than doing the dangle.
Older/wiser counsel would have told him to bolt because you can't piss off the govt and not have them land on you like Thor's hammer. Running or going underground is always an option.
Posted by: @PurpAv at March 14, 2013 04:42 AM (CAH/B)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 14, 2013 04:42 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 14, 2013 04:42 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: archie goodwin at March 14, 2013 04:43 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 14, 2013 08:33 AM (da5Wo)
This seems to me to be inextricably linked with the proposition that the "laws" are recognized as valid and can be understood by the citizenry. With the advent of the totalitarian administrative state, where everything not expressly permitted is illegal, and the regulators are writing new regulations by the pound (or page-foot), the concept of "being prepared for the consequences" doesn't seem so easy to me.
Posted by: Hrothgar at March 14, 2013 04:44 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at March 14, 2013 04:44 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 14, 2013 08:33 AM (JDIKC)
The idiot was worth more to them dead than alive. For somebody that was so fucking brilliant, his insight into the motivation of others was almost completely lacking.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 14, 2013 04:46 AM (zHyAo)
Scientists identify how deadly new virus infects cells
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/03/13/us-virus-mechanism-idUSBRE92C10620130313
The emergence of any new, lethal pathogen is always frightening, so I'm glad scientists are making progress on creating a vaccine for this new virus. But that's not the reason I'm linking the story. While it's hard to find levity in a situation that's already killed 9 of 15 people, I couldn't help but giggle when I read the following.
In one of the first detailed studies of the virus - which emerged in the Middle East and has so far infected 15 people worldwide, killing nine of them - Dutch researchers identified a cell surface protein it uses to enter and infect human cells.
...
Initial analysis by scientists at Britain's Health Protection Agency last year found that NCoV's closest relatives were most probably bat viruses.
Yet further work by a research team in Germany suggests NCoV may have come through an intermediary - possibly goats.
Submitted without further comment.*
(*Yes yes, I know they EAT goat, too. But this is the HQ.)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/b][/s][/u] at March 14, 2013 04:47 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 14, 2013 04:47 AM (4OvDk)
That's what you get when you primary nutrition is Red Bull and Doritos and you live in your Mom's basement.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 04:47 AM (sbV1u)
The embalming process should have started earlier, government officials said, in a Reuters report.
“Russian and German scientists have arrived to embalm Chavez, and they tell us it’s very difficult because the process should have started earlier,” said interim President Nicolas Maduro, Reuters reported. “Maybe we can’t do it. We are in the middle of the process. It’s complicated — it’s my duty to inform you.”
... damn
Posted by: Jared Loughner at March 14, 2013 04:48 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Hrothgar at March 14, 2013 08:44 AM (Cnqmv)
Nah, we discussed "using those consequences to highlight the unjustness" of the law above.
Nothing prevent that, however claiming "unjust law!" doesn't get rid of the consequences (until you prove that point by either a) getting a court to throw the law out or b) getting people to change it via legislative process.)
Posted by: tsrblke at March 14, 2013 04:48 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Hrothgar at March 14, 2013 08:44 AM (Cnqmv)
That the "Law" is so gargantuan that the common man can't know or comprehend it in any real sense is a valid point and an argument well worth having. But that's not what happened in Swartz' case. He knew he was breaking the law. He didn't expect the hammer to come down like it did.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 14, 2013 04:49 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 14, 2013 08:46 AM (zHyAo)
He's an amazing example of the "Tragedy of the Commons" in more ways than one I'd imagine.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 14, 2013 04:49 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at March 14, 2013 04:50 AM (l86i3)
Contrary to Protestants, Catholics believe in Mortal Sin. If Pelosi doesn't repent in time, and I hope she does, her baptism isn't going to save her. She has "cast off the yoke of God's law."
There is no redemption without repentance.
Posted by: Al at March 14, 2013 04:50 AM (V70Uh)
Posted by: Mainah at March 14, 2013 08:30 AM (659DL)
========
And he got away with it for two reasons: he had balls the size of watermelons and he understood how Communists thought and how to exploit their though processes.
Those are qualities we need again in this country.
Posted by: Nighthawk at March 14, 2013 04:50 AM (RSqz2)
The old, we-thought-it-was-that-easy way around the Gay Thing was to state that Scouting was not about sexuality, one way or the other. Modern thinking is that all behavior is sexualized and gender-inflected. It's quite a collision.
Didn't help that Baden-Powell wouldn't shut his British Liberal yap about jagoffs (apparently quite a problem at the time of the Boer War) and essence-wasting. He was a veritable Jack D Ripper on the subject, to our very great detriment a century later. Following that, one simply cannot say "on the other hand"... but a couple of the founders of BSA didn't even like to be around boys. They liked selling camping equipment and uniforms. Who'd have thought that could become a saving grace?
Posted by: comatus at March 14, 2013 04:50 AM (qaVK+)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 14, 2013 08:37 AM (9Bj8R)
********
Meh, between supplies, capital expenditures and overhead it's gonna cost you an arm and a leg.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 14, 2013 04:51 AM (pLvWv)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 14, 2013 04:51 AM (4OvDk)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at March 14, 2013 04:53 AM (l86i3)
“Russian and German scientists have arrived to embalm Chavez, and they tell us it’s very difficult because the process should have started earlier,” said interim President Nicolas Maduro, Reuters reported.
Yeah, Maduro? Here's a little hint. When the body starts to puff up like a blowfish and stink like a garbage scow, it's too late. I realize your third world foolishness might find that hard to understand, but there you go.
And WTH? Russian and German scientists? What, they don't have any competent embalmers in South America? They've had enough dictators, you'd think SOMEONE in the southern continent would know how to preserve the body of a totalitarian tyrant.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/b][/s][/u] at March 14, 2013 04:53 AM (4df7R)
Yet.
Also, with the pedophilia rants. When a liberal goes on about how they hate a group that protects pedos, just ask them why they have such a problem with public schools.
Posted by: GMan at March 14, 2013 04:54 AM (sxq57)
Now I always picture him as one of the muppets that shouted insults from the theater balcony in the muppet show. But walter works.
Statler and/or Hilton.
I evision myself as Animal. Or Beaker.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at March 14, 2013 04:55 AM (+z4pE)
And for some reason Gabe is Jose the Jalapeno. On a stick.
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 14, 2013 08:51 AM (4OvDk)
When CBD posts today you'll see a pic of me.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 04:55 AM (53z96)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2013 04:55 AM (g7q64)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 14, 2013 04:55 AM (4OvDk)
Posted by: Jared Loughner at March 14, 2013 04:56 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 14, 2013 04:57 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at March 14, 2013 04:57 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: clemenza at March 14, 2013 04:58 AM (HMQ8k)
And WTH? Russian and German scientists? What, they don't have any competent embalmers in South America? They've had enough dictators, you'd think SOMEONE in the southern continent would know how to preserve the body of a totalitarian tyrant.
In all fairness, they've been trying to keep a dead ideology alive for a while now: socialism.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at March 14, 2013 04:58 AM (+z4pE)
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 04:58 AM (53z96)
185, Yep. Scouting also has a dimension of encouraging bonds between the Scout and his family, and the existing policy really cements that. Changing the policy would basically have the BSA saying "Parents, we really want you actively involved in your son's life, in the Pack/Troop, and in the community...EXCEPT ON THIS ONE ISSUE IN WHICH CASE WE WILL EXERCISE DOMINION."
Posted by: @JohnTant at March 14, 2013 04:59 AM (tVWQB)
My comments were not in support of Swartz. In his case, several understandable applicable laws were broken. I am concerned about the use of a massive tax-payer funded prosecutorial-judiciary system that is empowered and encouraged to go after individual citizens with limited means to defend themselves.
Posted by: Hrothgar at March 14, 2013 05:00 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: @JohnTant at March 14, 2013 05:00 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 14, 2013 05:00 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 14, 2013 05:01 AM (9Bj8R)
:::When CBD posts today you'll see a pic of me. ::::
You had him airbrush some six-pack abs on you, didn't you?
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 14, 2013 08:57 AM (JDIKC)
Pretty hard to airbrush a daguerrotype.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at March 14, 2013 05:02 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at March 14, 2013 09:00 AM (JDIKC)
I think Vic looks like his contemporary, Moses.
(I keed, Vic!)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/b][/s][/u] at March 14, 2013 05:02 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at March 14, 2013 08:57 AM (l86i3)
*******
I didn't even know they were dating.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 14, 2013 05:02 AM (pLvWv)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at March 14, 2013 05:02 AM (l86i3)
Could be the medication.
And rape.
Posted by: Ashley J. Soopergenus at March 14, 2013 05:02 AM (iZP3p)
Posted by: Attila at March 14, 2013 05:02 AM (Cs2tJ)
Back to Vic for a sec:
"I will not do scantily clad women. That will quickly degenerate"
Well heck. It would help on a 30F degree AM in flipp'n March...
Posted by: Jess1 at March 14, 2013 05:03 AM (lbiWb)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 14, 2013 05:03 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at March 14, 2013 05:04 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 14, 2013 05:04 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 14, 2013 09:03 AM (9Bj8R)
France has generic surrender documents already drafted for any future conflicts.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 14, 2013 05:05 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at March 14, 2013 05:05 AM (feFL6)
Posted by: Jess1 at March 14, 2013 09:03 AM (lbiWb)
BTAIM I was asked to to post those kinds of links.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 05:05 AM (53z96)
Posted by: clemenza at March 14, 2013 05:05 AM (HMQ8k)
Posted by: Mirage at March 14, 2013 09:04 AM (Cyr3J)
My wife wishes.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 05:06 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at March 14, 2013 05:06 AM (l86i3)
Posted by: tsrblke at March 14, 2013 09:05 AM (GaqMa)
*******
Launching a preemptive surrender? Nice!
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 14, 2013 05:06 AM (pLvWv)
Posted by: Timing at March 14, 2013 05:07 AM (myvwb)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 14, 2013 05:07 AM (4OvDk)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2013 05:08 AM (g7q64)
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 05:08 AM (53z96)
Interesting earlier trivia where Francis of Assissi visited the Sultan of Egypt (121
Named after Francis of Assissi, St. Francis of Paola (1416-1507) was the hermit who founded the Order of Minims dedicated to the Lenten way of life (France, Germany, Spain) is called the Fire Handler. The holy man was favored with an eminent spirit of prophecy. He foretold to several persons, in the years 1447, 1448, and 1449, the taking of Constantinople by the Turks, which happened on the a 29 May, in 1453, under the command of Mahomet II, when Constantine Palaeologus, the last Christian emperor, was slain, fighting tumultuously in the streets. Once when refused passage by boat, he laid his cloak on the water with one end tied to his staff, and crossed the Strait of Messina to Sicily. He was also renowned for restoring life.
After Xavier (Basque) of Southern Navarre who grew up during the 18 year war by Ferdinand the Catholic King of Spain as the joint forces of Aragon and Castile invaded Navarre and split the kingdom. Francis was educated in France, taught Aristotelian philosophy at Beauvais college in Paris, co-founded the Jesuits, and dedicated his service as the first Jesuit missionary, vowing to convert the Muslims (1534) and traveled throughout the East.
Finally, no saint, Francis II (Francis I), the one and only Doppelkaiser, Emperor of both Germany and Austria, Apostolic King of Hungary, Croatia and Bohemia, opponent of Napoleonic France, dissolved the Holy Roman Empire (1806).
Posted by: William Wallace at March 14, 2013 05:08 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: clemenza at March 14, 2013 05:09 AM (HMQ8k)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2013 09:08 AM (g7q64)
That doesn't happen here. If they get caught, and they all do eventually, they do hard jail time.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 05:09 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at March 14, 2013 09:04 AM (l86i3)
As long as those campaign contributions keep coming in comrade, you don't have to worry about a thing!
Posted by: Emperor Barky Ochooma I at March 14, 2013 05:09 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Mirage at March 14, 2013 09:04 AM (Cyr3J)
My wife wishes.
Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 09:06 AM (53z96)
Really? I figure Charlton looks pretty moldy by now.
Posted by: maddogg at March 14, 2013 05:10 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 14, 2013 05:11 AM (ZshNr)
It never occurs to them that Government "charity" is just forced wealth redistribution.
It also never occurs to them that supplementing virtue with law creates bad people.
Government cannot create moral people precisely because the law is incapable of teaching self restraint and good moral habits.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 14, 2013 05:11 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2013 05:11 AM (g7q64)
Posted by: Mainah at March 14, 2013 05:12 AM (659DL)
Say it loud: (from Reuters)
Michigan Expected to Announce Takeover of Detroit's Finances:
Detroit is the poorest major city in the United States with more than a third of the population officially classified as living in poverty, and it has an unemployment rate of 18.2 percent compared with a national rate of 7.7 percent, according to government figures. Basic services such as street lights and police protection have broken down, and the city has suffered from mismanagement and political corruption.
Me: Detroit-Calling it a "third world country" is an insult to thired world countries.
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at March 14, 2013 05:12 AM (wbmaj)
But, for me, one of the defining characteristics of a Liberal is the belief that if what they are doing makes them feel good, but it's illegal, then f*ck that particular law.
Stop sign+late for work= F*ck it
Handicapped spot+few regular spots= F*ck it
Racial discrimination laws+White male doesn't get job= F*ck it
Law against torching private property+No outlet for frustration= F*ck it
No texting while driving law+incoming text= F*ck it
So I'm kinda leery about going down that path, no matter how short a distance.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 14, 2013 05:12 AM (iZP3p)
Asked if France should arm the rebels, Laurent Fabius said on France-Info radio Thursday that it's "one of the only means left to make things move politically" in Syria.
I'm sorry, but just why the hell should we care about "moving things politically" in Syria? Maybe I've run dry on the milk of human kindness, but from where I stand it appears to be a brutal dictator versus an uprising of terrorist rabble. I feel pity for the innocents caught in the crossfire (how many innocents are there in Syria?), but this is not a fight in which we appear to have a dog. If the French want to help the Syrian "rebels," fine. But if Libya's taught the world anything, it's that helping one group of bad guys fight another bad guy isn't really much of an improvement. See also the Iran/Iraq war.
And when did arming combatants become a "political" move? Sure, wars are all political when you get down to the brass tacks, But This is the French essentially saying, "Look, the only way to get rid of Assad is to give the other guys lots of guns and hope they shoot him, or enough of his people that he gives up." Usually the Euros are much more circumspect when discussing the violent overthrow and/or assassination of a dictator. Probably because they've got plenty of their own to deal with.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/b][/s][/u] at March 14, 2013 05:12 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2013 05:13 AM (g7q64)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 14, 2013 05:14 AM (g7q64)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy
Lynn available on amazon. at March 14, 2013 09:04 AM (l86i3)
----------
Obama: Bill, we're going after your shit.
Gates: We'll move everything, lock, stock, and barrel to BC.
Obama: Bill, Melinda is looking lovely this evening.
Posted by: Attila at March 14, 2013 05:14 AM (Cs2tJ)
Ultimately I would agree that there are no just wars, just necessary and unnecessary wars. A war being necessary is enough 'justification' for me. People always see the consequences of a war fought and not the consequences if that war hadn't been fought. I am led to believe that there are times where the latter was much worse; but if and by how much we will never know.
Posted by: RiverC at March 14, 2013 05:14 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: Attila at March 14, 2013 09:02 AM (Cs2tJ)
He wants us to have bad teeth, food and people dieing in government hospitals? What a useless cockmuncher and his wife too
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 14, 2013 05:15 AM (1Jaio)
And that dovetails nicely with what I'm saying. Those people were willing to take the hit. They knowingly broke the law in an effort to get it changed. I got no problem with that. But you have to be willing and prepared for it not to go your way.
Assuming one has the money to actually fight the feds in court. Of course, that's why they have plea deals....people are more likely to accept that, than trying to take it all the way to a jury trial, bankrupt themselves, and their family, likely lose their job, their home.
So no. It's bs. You, me, and just about everyone in this country manages to commit three federal felonies a day without even knowing it. Now, if the you inadvertently find yourself in the prosecutorial cross hairs, do you have the resources to retain a lawyer, and take it all the way to trial, or will you accept a plea deal?
In Swarz' case, it was intentional, he knew what he was doing. That's different. He should have taken the six months, or, since he apparently had the money, stuck it out through trial.
Posted by: Joe at March 14, 2013 05:15 AM (KESFj)
Posted by: RiverC at March 14, 2013 09:14 AM (KTytI)
"Just war" is probably a misnomer.
I think it's more "justified" than it has to do with "justice."
Posted by: tsrblke at March 14, 2013 05:16 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at March 14, 2013 05:16 AM (l86i3)
Related but....can anyone explain why everyone who drives a Mercedes is an asshole?
With BMWs they only become assholes with the 5 series and above. But with Mercedes anyone driving any class of Mercedes is an asshole.
I know this to be true because I live it on the roads of Northern VA every day.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 05:17 AM (sbV1u)
My Patriarch is in Syria as are a number of Orthodox Christians who have lived in that region for eons. They're definitely feeling the heat from this conflict.
Posted by: RiverC at March 14, 2013 05:17 AM (KTytI)
And charity directs ALL funds to the widows and orphans, lame and weakest members of society. Whereas taxes, regardless of tag, end up in the deep pockets of globalist "investors" and corporations, making the world's wealthiest elitists even more "too big to fail". But then, if corporatists (people, too) who refrain from paying taxes didn't get the tax funded "charity" they'd have to get a real job.
Posted by: William Wallace at March 14, 2013 05:17 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: andycanuck at March 14, 2013 05:17 AM (ORGYc)
More fun at Popehat on a diff. topic:
>> For the record: I am Ken, I am talking about the threats y'all sent, and I represent the inexpressible joy of ridiculing feckless legal bullies.
Posted by: Mama AJ at March 14, 2013 05:18 AM (SUKHu)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 14, 2013 05:18 AM (4OvDk)
What a useless cockmuncher and his wife too
Wasn't Gates' wife a secretary at Microsoft before he married her? Must have been an epic BJ on her part.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at March 14, 2013 05:18 AM (zF6Iw)
Ahem.
You should read my book.
Posted by: Karl von Clausewitz at March 14, 2013 05:19 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: maddogg at March 14, 2013 05:19 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: RiverC at March 14, 2013 09:17 AM (KTytI)
Then my prayers are with them that they survive the actions of those around them.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/b][/s][/u] at March 14, 2013 05:20 AM (4df7R)
Yes, in English we use the word 'just' in two ways, which can be ambiguous. One is in the sense of 'justice', or 'righteousness': i.e. 'a just man' doesn't mean the guy has justifications, but that he's a dang good person. On the other hand, 'just cause' probably means closer to 'having reasonable justifications' and not necessarily implying 'righteousness'.
Though when you're looking at Calvinistic thinking, sometimes 'I have reasoned through this and I find it to be correct' is the same thing as 'righteousness.' Our language has had some good tangles with this kind of thinking.
Posted by: RiverC at March 14, 2013 05:20 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet is no longer shamelessly hawking his book Amy Lynn available on amazon. at March 14, 2013 05:21 AM (l86i3)
Maybe he can move to a foreign country or war zone-like Brooklyn--via Drudge:
Protesters enraged over the fatal shooting of a teenager by police poured into Brooklyn streets for a third straight night Wednesday, pitching bricks, bottles and garbage in furious clashes with cops.
At least 18 demonstrators were arrested along Church Ave. in East Flatbush. Police struggled to control a hostile crowd that broke away from a planned peaceful vigil for Kimani (Kiki) Gray, 16, killed by police on Saturday night
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at March 14, 2013 05:21 AM (wbmaj)
Posted by: NYCcon at March 14, 2013 05:21 AM (jLXdE)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at March 14, 2013 05:22 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Mirage at March 14, 2013 05:22 AM (Cyr3J)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/b][/s][/u] at March 14, 2013 05:22 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: maddogg at March 14, 2013 05:22 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at March 14, 2013 05:22 AM (feFL6)
Windows 8 - Microsoft finally manages to make a good OS for mobile and touch devices.
Too bad they are trying to force the same OS on non-mobile and touch devices.
Posted by: RiverC at March 14, 2013 05:23 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at March 14, 2013 09:18 AM (zF6Iw)
I know she supports a lot of left wing causes and is a very liberal Catholic who supports "modernizing" the church. Intercourse her and her limp dick husband
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 14, 2013 05:23 AM (1Jaio)
When I unleash the power of my field upon your puny realm, you will bow down before me, you will pay heed, and you will blow me.
Soon, meatbags, soon.
Posted by: Higgs Boson at March 14, 2013 05:24 AM (WM+rJ)
I am assuming you are the exception that proves the rule.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 05:24 AM (sbV1u)
"Physicists: We've found the 'God Particle.'" I haven't read the story yet, but haven't they said this a couple of times before?
Behold the evolution of "god" -- grabs research grants.
Posted by: William Wallace at March 14, 2013 05:25 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 14, 2013 05:26 AM (4OvDk)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 14, 2013 05:27 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Vizzini [/i] at March 14, 2013 05:27 AM (O7Q1u)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 14, 2013 05:27 AM (4OvDk)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at March 14, 2013 05:27 AM (/kI1Q)
Ask them who Microsoft supported in the last election. They will reflexively say, 'Romney' (hint: None of us like Microsoft much, especially those of us who do tech stuff on Gov't contract)
Of course, Microsoft was in the bag for Obama ages ago. Microsoft and Obama believe in about the same kind of 'change'. Linux is more like Ron Paul. Romney would be HP/UX.
Anyone know who Apple gave the most support to?
Posted by: RiverC at March 14, 2013 05:27 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 14, 2013 05:28 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 14, 2013 05:28 AM (4OvDk)
Biden Press Office Apologizes For Demanding Student Journalist Delete Photographs
CBS Local, Washington: http://tiny.cc/sduxtw
ROCKVILLE, Md. (CBSDC) – Vice President Joe Biden’s press office has apologized to the University of Maryland following “pure intimidation” demands for a student journalist to delete photos he took of a domestic violence event featuring Biden.
...
“Did you take any photos during the event,” Barr said he was asked by Biden staffer Dana Rosenzweig. “I need to see your camera right now,” she reportedly said after Barr confirmed he had taken photographs of the event that also featured Attorney General Eric Holder and Maryland Sen. Ben Cardin.
The Biden staffer then requested to watch Barr delete his photos, Barr complied, and then the staffer reportedly asked him to show her his iPhone to confirm he did not save any of the photos....
Biden's staffpeople: when they're not locking reporters in broom closets, they're making them delete innocuous photos of public events.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/b][/s][/u] at March 14, 2013 05:29 AM (4df7R)
There is no "liberal" Catholic or "conservative" Catholic. There is only "Catholic." You either believe this stuff, or you don't, and if you don't, then you're just fooling yourself. Period. End of conversation. Full stop.
Melinda Gates, Pelosi, Sebelius, Biden....they're all kidding themselves. They are no more Catholic than I am a billionaire.
There is such a thing as dissent recognized in the Church. It's a tad complex, but the Reader's Digest explanation of it is, "keep it in the family." None of them do this, therefore none of them are really entitled to call themselves "Catholic."
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 05:29 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 14, 2013 05:29 AM (9Bj8R)
Volvo Wagon for Mrs VIA (with her NRA sticker in back window)
Drives liberals insane.
And several heterocentric married couples with Subaru's in our block.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 14, 2013 05:29 AM (iZP3p)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 14, 2013 09:07 AM (4OvDk)
========
They also fail to realize that if you are coerced into making "charitable" contributions what you are doing is, by definition, NOT charity.
Posted by: Nighthawk at March 14, 2013 05:29 AM (RSqz2)
Posted by: beach a.m. at March 14, 2013 05:29 AM (XYSwB)
It may be too late to preserve deceased Venezuela President Hugo Chavez’s body in a glass casket “for eternity” after all.
The embalming process should have started earlier, government officials said, in a Reuters report.
They should just leave the rotting carcass on display
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 14, 2013 05:31 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: RiverC at March 14, 2013 05:32 AM (KTytI)
In response to RockefellerÂ’s critique, Obama said heÂ’s not involved in drafting such memos, the senators told POLITICO
So not only is the White House not involved in shutting down tours of the White House, but the President isn't involved in drafting memos allegedly justifying the President's powers to order the assassination of Americans overseas.
Next on the docket: The First Lady is not responsible for selecting the First Lady's wardrobe, and Joe Biden is not responsible for comments that come out of Joe Biden's mouth.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/b][/s][/u] at March 14, 2013 05:32 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 14, 2013 09:31 AM (1Jaio)
They should gift him to underpriveledged rats and cockroaches in a Caracas alley.
Posted by: maddogg at March 14, 2013 05:33 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Lincolntf at March 14, 2013 05:33 AM (ZshNr)
It may be too late to preserve deceased Venezuela President Hugo Chavez’s body in a glass casket “for eternity” after all.
The embalming process should have started earlier, government officials said, in a Reuters report.
They should just leave the rotting carcass on display
******** Political allegory?
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 14, 2013 05:33 AM (pLvWv)
It would be the perfect monument to all he has done for the country.
Posted by: no good deed at March 14, 2013 05:33 AM (mjR67)
Posted by: beach a.m. at March 14, 2013 05:34 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) Channelling Breitbart at March 14, 2013 05:34 AM (4OvDk)
The Bill of Rights for me, but not for thee!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 14, 2013 05:34 AM (3Mkrp)
Volvo! The official car of preening, sanctimonious Massachusetts liberals everywhere. Get yours at a New England Volvo dealer soon!
When you're driving 128 or the Mass Pike and someone does something stupid, invariably it's a Volvo. I take it you're nowhere in New England, because a Volvo with an NRA sticker on it would be spending a lot of time in the body shop.
I like your example. I think I now want a Volvo for my next car. With an NRA sticker, and a "OIF Veteran" sticker, and a "It's a Life, Not a Choice" sticker, and a "Bush-Cheney 2004" sticker, and.....
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 05:35 AM (sbV1u)
As much as he was a crazy, do have some respect for the dead.
Which is why I respected him even while he was breathing.
Posted by: RiverC at March 14, 2013 05:35 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 14, 2013 09:31 AM (1Jaio)
Considering there are those in South America who believe the Spirit of Chavez is what prompted the installation of the first Latin American Pope, why don't they just leave him as is so they can witness his inevitable Sainthood? The body of a Saint isn't supposed to decompose, right? So embalming shouldn't be necessary.
Idiots, the whole lot of them.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/i][/b][/s][/u] at March 14, 2013 05:35 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 09:29 AM (sbV1u)
I actually have this debate on a regular basis with friends of mine and whether various catholic health groups run by various pen wielding nuns are on the "right side" of dissent or whether they push the envelope waaayy to far.
My general thought is they push it to far for a number of reasons. Even when they keep it in the family I have to sit through conferences that I call "bishop bashing" because they seem to constantly want to pick fights with any bishop who doesn't agree with them on everything.
Hell, I dissent with some church teachings on the Birth Control thing (let's not get into my opinion it'd be longer than an ace movie review) but I'm fucking out there fighting for the Obamacare changes because it's overreach. Those nut jobs just shrugged and went "meh."
Posted by: tsrblke at March 14, 2013 05:36 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Jean at March 14, 2013 05:37 AM (VRCBg)
Oh...you are going to LOVE the Chris Matthews link in the link dump.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 14, 2013 05:38 AM (3Mkrp)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at March 14, 2013 05:38 AM (feFL6)
323
It may be too late to preserve deceased Venezuela President Hugo Chavez’s body in a glass casket “for eternity” after all.
The embalming process should have started earlier, government officials said, in a Reuters report.
They should just leave the rotting carcass on display
************************************************
Isn't that what we've seen on TV for the past several years?
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at March 14, 2013 05:38 AM (n8LUb)
Posted by: Jean at March 14, 2013 05:38 AM (VRCBg)
That's gotta be a thing of beauty.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 05:38 AM (sbV1u)
If you're gonna go Volvo, go with the wagon.
That back glass has lots of room for stickers.
All of them right at eyeball height for the car behind you.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 14, 2013 05:39 AM (iZP3p)
Posted by: Whatev at March 14, 2013 05:41 AM (A7Wh1)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at March 14, 2013 05:42 AM (Jcd0S)
The French revolution was genocide against their own. Those murderers who survived and thrived included the most twisted. "For the grandeur of France" always functioned vs. Liberté, égalité, fraternité to determine the fate of France. French Leaders certainly coined propaganda that works, as if there was ever any intention to fulfill campaign promises, campaigns being military or political, no difference. French disillusionment is their national public expectation, cynicism.
The legitimacy of Vichy France and Pétain's leadership was constantly challenged by the exiled General Charles de Gaulle, based in London. Duh. It wasn't so much being contrary to the Vichy national socialism but simply the challenge to being king of the mountain that de Gaulle presented. HE wanted it all. And so far as he was concerned, France owed humanity at large absolutely nothing. Rather, the world owed France for whatever.
Posted by: William Wallace at March 14, 2013 05:42 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: waldo truth at March 14, 2013 05:43 AM (3VhRQ)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at March 14, 2013 05:44 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at March 14, 2013 05:48 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: waldo truth at March 14, 2013 05:49 AM (3VhRQ)
I tire quickly of philosophy and military science students being made to agonize over Just War theory. It was formulated for rump empires, with monarchs who claimed Divine Right, and had Issues with the papacy over who invested whom. It was stretched to its limit to deal with the diplomacy/war of Westphalian states, and could not deal with the American Revolution, let alone the American Civil War, in any meaningful way at all.
Naturally, the Vatican had to use it against the new nationalist-states a la Garibaldi, because, well, Garibaldi. The world-socialists cleverly created the National Front communist insurgencies to get around its applicability. It has nothing to say to pan-[insert racial clan here] identity states, or guerrilla conflict for cause. Really, just a footnote to canon law (SWIDT?).
Once you try on the idea of rules for conduct of warfare (and you probably shouldn't), the morals of religious tradition are one large source of moral enlightenment. Just War theory, though, is all about invoking God's blessing on the undertaking of war. It's like asking God to explain a car accident.
Posted by: comatus at March 14, 2013 05:53 AM (qaVK+)
Posted by: waldo truth at March 14, 2013 05:55 AM (3VhRQ)
"Ted Kennedy's CAR has killed more people than my GUN"
and
"www.offmyASS.com"
Posted by: Katfish at March 14, 2013 05:57 AM (Nx5wc)
Romney would be HP/UX.
Well that's pretty accurate and explains why he lost. HP's suck ass and I try to persuade anyone that asks me for computer advice I steer them clear of those piece of shit computers.
Posted by: buzzion at March 14, 2013 06:02 AM (GULKT)
The reason he committed suicide isn't because of a fear of jailtime, as the article reveals. The reason he did it is because:
1.) He had major mental and developmental problems, stemming from an early age when he was never forced to cope with hard work and frustration and boredom and routine like most humans.
2.) He was despondent over the potential of having a felony conviction on his record, because it threw a wrench into the works of his life plans. He had become convinced that the only solution to America's problems was his particular version of technocratic liberal fascism, where HE would be the man in charge, forcing people to "be good" by using the power of the government. To that end, his ultimate goal was to work in the White House, for the Obama (or presumably upcoming Clinton) administrations. And he knew that he could never get into that position with a felony conviction. Hence, he considered his life's ambition to be ruined.
You really need to read The New Yorker on Swartz. It's an eye-opener. As it turns out, he was really quite a nasty piece of work (despite all his friends in the article saying how 'inspiring' he was), one which the world is arguably slightly better off without, despite the sad circumstances surrounding his exit from life.
All that said, federal prosecutorial overreach ain't no joke, no matter who it's done against. And Swartz arguably was victimized here.
Posted by: Jeff B. at March 14, 2013 06:05 AM (bcLhD)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at March 14, 2013 06:07 AM (Jcd0S)
Posted by: Mindy the wacko-bird at March 14, 2013 08:01 AM (wk9P4)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 14, 2013 07:09 AM (sbV1u) ***
Why not?
Posted by: Klawnet at March 14, 2013 09:44 AM (ePxxX)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3119 seconds, 486 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Vic at March 14, 2013 02:53 AM (53z96)