March 07, 2013
— andy Well, that was exciting.
Perplexing that Rand Paul has to go through this to ask a Nobel Peace Prize winner whether or not he agrees with killing U.S. citizens.
— David Angell (@djangell) March 6, 2013
Now for the follow-through.
Remember, call the White House tomorrow morning and demand an answer to the question! 202-456-1111 #StandWithRand
— Melissa Clouthier (@MelissaTweets) March 7, 2013
Posted by: andy at
03:05 AM
| Comments (239)
Post contains 71 words, total size 1 kb.
Fair use must be considered on a case by case basis looking at the following:
- the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
- the nature of the copyrighted work;
- the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
- the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
Those 4 factors came from Folson vs Marsh in which the court blasted the defendant for copying over 300 pages of a work.
So how does that effect us here? Do not copy and paste entire articles from one site to another without permission from the author. The ideal is to either link it without copying any, or make a short statement as to what is there or a small portion of the work. Besides that, copying entire long articles is tedious for the rest of the Morons.
Photographs are much more difficult because you can not copy a part of a photograph. Generally a photo is copyrighted if it has the owners logo imbedded or if it comes from a profession journal of some type. But that is not an issue for the average Moron since we canÂ’t copy the photo anyway and must link.
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:06 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/zx2MY5
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:07 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/la05Ky
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:07 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/QqRO1X
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:07 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/zqNr1q
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:07 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/mCy5X5
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:08 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/C1G9n7
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:08 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/mSCn0H
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:08 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/BXdz1V
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:08 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/LsvCAV
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:09 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/1KEYQf
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:09 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/ienTN3
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:10 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/sRV2Ov
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:10 AM (53z96)
Good morning, fellow Morons. Hope youÂ’re all making it through the snow and ice. HereÂ’s a little story about Groucho Marx:
The Marx Brothers began as a vaudeville act, and were able to shape their shows as they went on by observing what the audience liked and what they hated. So even after they were signed to MGM, they would take their next movie out on the road as a stage performance in order to try out scenes live before filming them.
In the summer of 1936, they were previewing A Day at the Races in San Francisco. The house was packed and the audience loving it, but the show was running long. To speed things up, the director sent Groucho onstage while Chico was playing the piano. Groucho went into his routine, but the audience, wanting to hear more of Chico, began booing him.
Groucho walked downstage and stood patiently until the audience quieted down. Then he said, “I have to stay here – I’m getting paid. But nobody’s keeping you.” That brought the house down and the show was able to go on.
Hope you all have a wonderful day.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at March 07, 2013 03:10 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Opus An Arcus at March 07, 2013 03:10 AM (M+l81)
http://is.gd/AVWDcr
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:10 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/gxp0eo
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:11 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/4nruxa
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:11 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/3tO12a
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:11 AM (53z96)
The president could regain the initiative during the debate over the resolution, but only if Republicans are foolish enough to give him the opportunity to blame them for a government shutdown.
Just how do you propose Republicans are going to keep Choomstick from blaming the Republicans since he is already doing that and the MFM is helping him?
What conservatives should do now is offer modest first steps on entitlement reform. A well-designed reduction in benefits for the highest earners could make a real dent in the debt projections, cause no hardship, and establish the precedent for bolder reforms in the future. If the administration balks, Republicans will have exposed its obduracy at no cost to themselves.
What planet are you people living on? What Republicans need to do is keep on blocking spending and tax increases and talk as loud as they can in venues that the MFM can not block.
http://is.gd/E4d8lV
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:11 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/WpYOgF
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:12 AM (53z96)
http://is.gd/WITu6R
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:12 AM (53z96)
I'd take a food taster.
Posted by: Retread at March 07, 2013 03:12 AM (zxitI)
In 1963 it had a base price of around $4,200. In the article I got this from the one they were talking about sold for $115,000. Another sold for $132,000. Some have sold for as low as $32,000 but I would be wary. $4200 in 1963 using gov inflation numbers is approximately $31,000 today.
http://is.gd/c3e73w
And thatÂ’s it for Thursday, March 07, 2013.
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:13 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 07, 2013 03:13 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 07, 2013 03:14 AM (d0Dmj)
http://is.gd/ienTN3
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 07:10 AM (53z96)
Did Weepy try to defund Bammycare? The nicotine addicted pile of shit has that power but he'd rather go golfing with the Indonsian than do what an opposition party leader is supposed to do. Maybe Rand Paul can show this emotional retard what it's like to have a backbone.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 07, 2013 03:15 AM (LHO1A)
Posted by: BurtTC at March 07, 2013 03:15 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:16 AM (53z96)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 07, 2013 03:16 AM (d0Dmj)
Posted by: zeera at March 07, 2013 03:17 AM (3dXwx)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at March 07, 2013 03:17 AM (feFL6)
What amuses me about the argument over using drones to kill US Citizens on US soil without due process is the people arguing for it on the basis of "emergency" presuppose one thing:
That we have Hellfire armed drones circling in the skies above us just waiting for such an emergency.
It takes a bit of time to preflight and arm up a drone, and the ones that do have air-to-mud capability aren't that speedy. So there would be plenty of time to send a ground based team in before "OMG! Drone Strike Now!!!!!11eleventy!!!"
Posted by: AZ Hi Desert (All my Hate cannot be found) at March 07, 2013 03:18 AM (ial2b)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 07, 2013 07:13 AM (tOkJB)
I don't know much about some of those people but when they have dinner with choomboy they become suspect.
Even if they don't sell us out they are enabling him.
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:19 AM (53z96)
Posted by: NR Pax at March 07, 2013 03:19 AM (1ml8s)
Posted by: zeera at March 07, 2013 07:17 AM (3dXwx)
Yep, should have grabbed it. Did it still have the rib?
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:20 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 07, 2013 03:21 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: Regular Moron at March 07, 2013 07:17 AM (feFL6)
But but but snowmaggeden caused by Globull Warming caused by evil capitalists!
Posted by: MFM at March 07, 2013 03:22 AM (53z96)
I disagree that it will do no good.
Rand's filibuster will nudge the narrative just a bit toward freedom. Is it huge? Of course not, but it does give the sense that Obama and his handlers are not untouchable.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 07, 2013 03:22 AM (GsoHv)
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 07, 2013 03:23 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: BurtTC at March 07, 2013 07:20 AM (BeSEI)
No. He could have been, but the Republican party stamped that out rather quickly. Imagine....a Republican with good ideas!
Preposterous!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 07, 2013 03:24 AM (GsoHv)
I'm torn a bit on this drone issue.
On the one hand: It's very vulnerable to being misused. It reminds me a bit of the waterboarding dilemma. Do I mind a suspected terrorist being waterboarded in limited circumstances to extract otherwise unobtainable information? I hate that we have to do this, but the answer is No.
But do I want it expanded to include members of Tony Soprano's crew, who might have important information about some kind of vicious plot somewhere? Or how about the Hell's Angels? They might be able to reveal just the right info to bust that meth ring if they were rounded up and waterboarded. How about grabbing some Crips from their cells or street hangouts and getting the info on who's being targeted this week? No way do we want to go in those types of directions.
I do NOT trust the Obama administration to do the right thing with the drones and exercise proper discretion, the idea is very scary. I always tend to err on the side of giving less power and discretion to the government.
However, when I think back of that car heading toward Fort Dix with a bomb, planned to be driven through the Fort Dix gate and detonated, the idea of a pre-emptive drone strike makes me a little more warm and fuzzy.
I don't see this as a black and white issue.
Posted by: RM at March 07, 2013 03:24 AM (/Frlf)
I wish you were right but we can see he is already going into the Obama arched back cat hissing and the MFM will bury it.
BTW, that NYC slavery queen story was for you.
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:24 AM (53z96)
Even if they don't sell us out they are enabling him.
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 07:19 AM (53z96)
I think strategically you have to break wind bread with the JEF no matter how nauseating you find it to be. If they told him to go fuck himself, his MFM enablers would be all over that about not respecting the office and of course saying it's due to RACISM. Plus Skeeter can then whine about how he extended a peace offering which was rejected and how can you negotiate with people like that. I think the Repubs get a pass on this.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 07, 2013 03:24 AM (LHO1A)
Posted by: zeera at March 07, 2013 03:25 AM (3dXwx)
Well, that's probably what Holder wants.
And whether it is tactically sound isn't the point. The fact that our rulers in DC think that it is acceptable to even contemplate this is chilling.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 07, 2013 03:26 AM (GsoHv)
The act of sitting down with him is a sellout.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 07, 2013 03:27 AM (GsoHv)
"It takes a bit of time to preflight and arm up a drone, and the ones that do have air-to-mud capability aren't that speedy. So there would be plenty of time to send a ground based team in before "OMG! Drone Strike Now!!!!!11eleventy!!!"
Good info that was not aware of. Helps in my thinking on this issue. Thanks.
Posted by: RM at March 07, 2013 03:27 AM (/Frlf)
I believe it will have a net positive in the overall picture.
Anyone see BO today?
I'm guessing Barky took his rage out on someone.something.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 07, 2013 03:28 AM (Tgggp)
Posted by: Thorvald at March 07, 2013 03:29 AM (1V6Pv)
I disagree.
They had a perfect opportuinity to stick it to Obama by declining the invitation with the rationale that they were going to the Senate to express solidarity with their party and its fight against creeping totalitarianism.
Instead they played business-as-usual games.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 07, 2013 03:29 AM (GsoHv)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 07, 2013 07:22 AM (GsoHv)
Plus this got the approval of a few libs on Facebook who haven't completely lost their minds but were previously completely in the tank for Easy Bake. And some donks signed on to it. I think it's a significant chink in the edifice.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 07, 2013 03:29 AM (LHO1A)
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 07:24 AM (53z96)
Okay, that is a perfect image. We need a photoshop!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 07, 2013 03:30 AM (GsoHv)
That is the key. Sometimes (rarely) we have President we can trust, but otherwise no. We already have laws on the books involving hot pursuit and imminent threat that allow police to use lethal weapons.
Now Holder is proposing, albeit indirectly, that we have armed drones circling that may be used to take out American citizens on American soil with no due process.
His memo was so vague on the the uses he may as well not even have sent it. It was another stonewall. Congress needs to take this up and provide clear and unambiguous rules for when/if this kind of escalation should occur and who has the authority to do it.
And finally overall, in the never ending drug war we have militarized all of our police forces. London bobbies used to not even carry guns. Ours now have swat teams the equivalent of a company of assault marines. We are now giving them tans and they want to give them an armed air force too and allow uncontrolled execution by bureaucrats.
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:31 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Sal at March 07, 2013 03:31 AM (RZvso)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at March 07, 2013 03:32 AM (feFL6)
What difference does it make?
The MFM will climb on the Republicans regardless of anything they do and it still gives the choomsuck leverage.
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:32 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 07:24 AM (53z96)
I just noticed it! great story, and great point.
And the way NY is run, a Reconstruction by the people of SC wouldn't be a bad thing.
If you all bring your shrimp and grits recipes I'm in.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 07, 2013 03:33 AM (GsoHv)
Yes, big sigh. Especially if you had 5K available.
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:33 AM (53z96)
Agree absolutely. You don't reverse the tide all at once. It's the little things like this that mushroom into something bigger. Think Rick Santelli's rant leading to the Tea Party.
Posted by: pep at March 07, 2013 03:34 AM (YXmuI)
Posted by: toby928© presents at March 07, 2013 03:35 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 07, 2013 03:36 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 07:31 AM (53z96)
This is an important point.
I think this is where the disconnect between the cops and the people began.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 07, 2013 03:36 AM (GsoHv)
Posted by: Infidelswine at March 07, 2013 03:37 AM (BVawI)
Posted by: Icedog at March 07, 2013 03:37 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 07, 2013 07:33 AM (GsoHv)
Not much of a recipe needed. Just dump in shrimp the way you like them in the grits. I'll try to gather them up and have them ready to post the next time you have a food thread.
Did you try any while you were in Charleston? That is where they originated.
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:38 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Thorvald at March 07, 2013 03:39 AM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: BurtTC at March 07, 2013 07:15 AM (BeSEI)
My first reaction is that anything wireless can be hacked. IIRC, and I may not, the wireless insulin pumps have already been hacked. If you don't think your friendly neighborhood sociopath code kid won't fuck with people for the lulz, you apparently have never met the internet.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at March 07, 2013 03:40 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Blacksheep at March 07, 2013 03:41 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: How do I apply to be a drone pilot? at March 07, 2013 03:43 AM (9sjmH)
Posted by: ElKomandante at March 07, 2013 03:44 AM (yUV0V)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 07, 2013 03:44 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 07, 2013 03:45 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 07, 2013 03:45 AM (tOkJB)
To me the drone strike issue is very simple. Allowing the government to use drone strikes against US citizens only lessens the cost to the government on creating a police state.
In the old-school days, the jackbooted thugs actually had to show up at your door to demand that you submit to the state, in which case, the noncompliant citizen might actually shoot back, endangering the thugs. There is a cost associated with that.
With drones, it's virtually cost-free. Don't want.
Posted by: chemjeff hates snow at March 07, 2013 03:45 AM (BBWjt)
Posted by: Blacksheep at March 07, 2013 03:46 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 07:38 AM (53z96)
Every morning for breakfast, and the last day for lunch.
Yes, I am obsessed.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 07, 2013 03:46 AM (GsoHv)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 07, 2013 07:27 AM (GsoHv)
I'm with you on this one, CBD. Obama has proven over and over again that he does not and will not deal in good faith. He will lie, move goalposts and, as we saw with the release of illegals and the "make it hurt" e-mails, has no compunction about punishing ordinary Americans in order to further his goals.
In my dream world, a Boehner-led delegation would walk into the Oval Office: "Take Reggie's dick out of your ass and listen up, you Kenyan cocksucker. The money spigot is shut. We're not funding a single thing from now until doomsday. If you want cash, you'd better send that Klingon beard of your to peddle her Montana-sized ass up and down Pennsylvania Avenue, because we're through giving you blank checks to fuck up the country. Oh, and by the way, if you've got any Kools or choom or crack hidden in that desk, you better smoke it tonight, because we're filing impeachment papers tomorrow morning. Have a nice day."
I'm sick of our "representatives" giving this asshole respect he doesn't deserve. Treat him like the feculent canker sore he is.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at March 07, 2013 03:46 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 07, 2013 03:46 AM (g7q64)
"Feculent canker sore."
Marvelous!
The rest was pretty damned good too.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 07, 2013 03:49 AM (GsoHv)
Posted by: Ammo Dump at March 07, 2013 03:50 AM (YYyqq)
Posted by: Icedog at March 07, 2013 03:51 AM (9ScGj)
There are a lot of "free use" photos out there which muddies the water. And I did not want to get too deep into the "inside baseball" stuff. It is a damn shitty mess of case layer, especially for people who are not lawyer...like me.
(But I used to watch Perry Mason)
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:51 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Blacksheep at March 07, 2013 03:51 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: The Chicken at March 07, 2013 03:52 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: real joe at March 07, 2013 03:53 AM (PD2ad)
Posted by: jakeman at March 07, 2013 03:54 AM (96M6e)
Posted by: Icedog at March 07, 2013 03:55 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 07, 2013 03:56 AM (FsUAO)
I have only heard Newt really slam libs with this kind of discussion.
The other thing I liked is the talk of separation of powers.
One thing I didn't hear is that unchecked, TFG could in theory, go after political figures, by just calling them terrorist. Although, this had to be what everybody is thinking.
Posted by: sTevo at March 07, 2013 03:56 AM (VMcEw)
Posted by: Beagle at March 07, 2013 03:56 AM (oCdqI)
Posted by: Blacksheep at March 07, 2013 03:56 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 07, 2013 03:56 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 07, 2013 03:56 AM (tOkJB)
Thank you, Vic. I wanted to know which senators went to dinner with the SCOAMT.
The JEF couldn't pay me to have dinner with him. Does anyone know why they agreed to go? I know why McCain, Grahamnesty and Ayotte went, they are the new threesome of the Senate. Why would Johnson and Toomey agree?
Was McConnell invited and refuset to go? If so, I have a bit of respect for Mitch.
Back to Rand Paul's fillibuster, I put on MSNBC to see if they mentioned it. I won't keep on any longer than to fnd out what they are discussing. They menitoned the dinner, but I changed it back to Fox local to catch the weather forecast.
Posted by: CarolT at March 07, 2013 03:57 AM (z4WKX)
Posted by: traye at March 07, 2013 03:57 AM (lEakp)
Posted by: franksalterego at March 07, 2013 03:57 AM (omVzF)
Posted by: Boone at March 07, 2013 03:57 AM (tIyK2)
It's quite possible that TFG knew what was going on, made the dinner invite, and then had Reid move the schedule.
Fortunately, Paul has the IQ and skills to do something like that without extensive preparation.
Also, John Stewart apparently mentioned it and backed Paul, which in LIV world is a big deal. This is a good example of how to break through the MSM and get peoples' attention.
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 07, 2013 03:57 AM (GoIUi)
I don't believe you.
What got approval on my feed full of liberalism's well-educated upper-class/bohemian white core demo was a call for the "summary execution" of Paul's "entire family" by "burning," because they advocate the overthrow of the government.
Also, if he supports the 2nd Amendment, he's a hypocrite, because drones are also made by weapons companies. (Yeah.)
Also, he said "six thousand," and that's a Dominionist dog-whistle.
Also, he's a hypocrite because if he doesn't think a doctor can reach in your pussy and rip a fetus out, then how can he object when the TSA reaches in your pussy looking for a bomb? (Yeah.)
You don't know any "libs." They're fucking crazed. You might know a couple Democrats. They're just dumb. And they'll forget who Rand Paul is by noon today.
Posted by: oblig. at March 07, 2013 03:57 AM (cePv8)
Posted by: madamex at March 07, 2013 03:57 AM (iqWMW)
Posted by: jakeman at March 07, 2013 03:58 AM (96M6e)
I'm all for haveing a copyright law..... exactly as intended by the Constitution. What I am opposed to is the Mickey Mouse laws we have now that extend the time every time Disney gives them some money.
Now 75 years after the death of the holder.
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 03:58 AM (53z96)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 07, 2013 03:58 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 07, 2013 04:00 AM (FsUAO)
It should be possible to do both: to sit down to dinner with him, smile for the cameras, and give a show of trying to work things out with the President of the United States... for the people. And when the cameras go off, you turn to the Scoamf and tell him he owns this mess, and you are going to let him stew in the juices of his own creation, without doing a thing to help him out of it.
Posted by: BurtTC at March 07, 2013 04:00 AM (BeSEI)
upthread someone mentioned the Fort Dix example...
I'm thinking they'll go after more vengeful "terrorists" like tax resisters and "anonymous bloggers who hate corrupt politicians"...
Montgomery County bint was trying to call out "the real threat"...
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 07, 2013 04:00 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: DangerGirl at March 07, 2013 04:00 AM (pUAXu)
Posted by: Opus An Arcus at March 07, 2013 04:00 AM (M+l81)
Posted by: Blacksheep at March 07, 2013 04:01 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: Icedog at March 07, 2013 04:01 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 07, 2013 04:01 AM (FsUAO)
face it to ~51% of the nation the office holder is an elected Dictator or Emperor....
"so long as he has the magic D it is all good."
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 07, 2013 04:02 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: sTevo at March 07, 2013 04:03 AM (VMcEw)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 07, 2013 04:03 AM (OevbG)
Thanks, fellow morons, for the drone conversation and knowledge.
Vic, agree, the 63 split window is about as good as it gets. About 4.7 seconds from 0-60 with the 427 engine, as I recall from the Car and Driver road tests of the day.
Posted by: RM at March 07, 2013 04:03 AM (/Frlf)
Posted by: Truman North, last of the famous international playboys at March 07, 2013 04:04 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: RM at March 07, 2013 08:03 AM (/Frlf)
Did they have a 427 for that in 63? I though their strongest engine was a 340hp 327??? I'm too lazy to Bing it now.
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 04:05 AM (53z96)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at March 07, 2013 07:40 AM (Gk3SS)
Oh look, another reason for me to not go on an insulin pump.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 07, 2013 04:05 AM (da5Wo)
This time around, I absolutely want some fire, regardless of who is running on the dem side (which I think will be Michelle) but I digress.
I will say that Rand showed how things are done, and was able to do it with elegance and history on his side. I was proud he was on our side.
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 07, 2013 04:07 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Thorvald at March 07, 2013 04:07 AM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: Ian S. at March 07, 2013 04:07 AM (OevbG)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at March 07, 2013 04:10 AM (feFL6)
What got approval on my feed full of liberalism's well-educated upper-class/bohemian white core demo was a call for the "summary execution" of Paul's "entire family" by "burning," because they advocate the overthrow of the government.
Of course it wouldn't do any good to point out that the dog-eating retard's best bud Billy Ayers wanted the same thing.
I really, really hate liberals.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at March 07, 2013 04:11 AM (zF6Iw)
He's not perfect, but he understands liberty. Posted by: Truman North, last of the famous international playboys at March 07, 2013 08:04 AM (I2LwF)
Oh, but the important thing seems to be that he is perfect (ie, he agrees with me 100% of the time and does everything I think he should do 100% of the time).
He didn't end up staggering around the Senate floor like Jimmy Stewart in Mr. Smith Goes to Washington so he's a pussy and a coward and a RINO.
/sarc
Posted by: Donna V. at March 07, 2013 04:11 AM (7FqJH)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 07, 2013 04:11 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 07, 2013 04:12 AM (LHO1A)
Posted by: Thorvald at March 07, 2013 04:12 AM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: Truman North, last of the famous international playboys at March 07, 2013 04:13 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Donna V. at March 07, 2013 04:14 AM (7FqJH)
The bulldyke Napolitano probably is frigging herself over having the ability to shoot a Hellfire at anyone that doesn't follow the "party line"
Posted by: Mjölnir, Banhammer from the gates of Hell at March 07, 2013 04:14 AM (Jls4P)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 07, 2013 04:15 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Thorvald at March 07, 2013 04:16 AM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: Thorvald at March 07, 2013 08:12 AM (1V6Pv)
He is not a Republican. He is a Dem who changed to Republican and then to an independent.
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 04:16 AM (53z96)
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at March 07, 2013 04:16 AM (VQ9KL)
http://annapuna.blogspot.com/2013/03/drone-debate.html
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 07, 2013 04:16 AM (QNagW)
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 08:05 AM (53z96)
I thought the fuel injected 327 had a 375 hp rating.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 07, 2013 04:16 AM (LHO1A)
That's why I think it was smart of him to read from a lot of lefty writers' anti-drone pieces. It made for a sharp and easily seen separation between actual liberals and those who simply worship power and/or skin color.
Especially when both Code Pink and the ACLU endorsed Rand, but both Reid and Durbin tried to shut him down.
Posted by: Ian S. at March 07, 2013 04:16 AM (OevbG)
It was admirable and a wonderful performance and the final result will be what?
Oh, I think you know.
Posted by: Drone Strike at March 07, 2013 04:17 AM (BrQrN)
The filibuster yesterday was awesome. I have mixed feelings on the reasoning behind it but it was nice to get excited about something post-election.
btw notice that my boy Rubio not only helped in the filibuster but also was not one of the 12 Senators who decided to bail for dinner with the idiot in chief
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at March 07, 2013 04:17 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 07, 2013 04:18 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: Thorvald at March 07, 2013 04:18 AM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 07, 2013 08:16 AM (LHO1A)
It may have in later years, that was from a 'Vette site. Some time frame in all that mess they changed the way they calculated HP too so that could acount for a different rating.
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 04:18 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 07, 2013 04:19 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Truman North, last of the famous international playboys at March 07, 2013 04:19 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: franksalterego at March 07, 2013 04:20 AM (omVzF)
BBT
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 04:20 AM (53z96)
That was one hell of a beast, though not as unruly as a 427 Cobra. Too much engine and not enough brakes or suspension can really grab your attention.
Re the split-window '63s, it's worth remembering that cutting out the bar between the rear windows was considered a cool thing to do in '63, and several car magazines ran "how-to-do-it" articles showing owners what they could do with a hacksaw (it wasn't difficult). Those things weren't "classic" then...they were just cars.
I'd need a 5-acre lot to hold all the '50s and '60s cars I coveted and could have bought dirt-cheap a year or two (or 10 years) after they came out.
Posted by: MrScribbler at March 07, 2013 04:20 AM (cFhY4)
Posted by: HoboJerky, profit of DOOM! at March 07, 2013 04:21 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 07, 2013 04:22 AM (9Bj8R)
It's not so much Dinner that bothers me, it's more the fact that a major event was happening in their chambers regarding one from their party and they decided to bail for the Dinner anyways. I probably would have taken the dinner invite to spend an hour telling him what failure he is. But if there's a filibuster taking place like the one we saw yesterday i'd have told the others to tell the President i'm busy working.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at March 07, 2013 04:22 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Truman North, last of the famous international playboys at March 07, 2013 04:22 AM (I2LwF)
Hopefully we don't have any more embarrassing episodes like we did on the ONT last night.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 07, 2013 04:22 AM (da5Wo)
The Powerball rolled over while Rand filibustered. So the jackpot is now a $150 million annuity.
The Mega Millions also rolled over Tuesday night. So its jackpot is now a $33 million annuity.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 07, 2013 04:23 AM (QNagW)
What if, instead of a photograph, the property was tangible? Would you advocate taking someone's building after 15 years?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 07, 2013 04:23 AM (GsoHv)
Posted by: annoyed at March 07, 2013 04:23 AM (uEm7J)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 07, 2013 04:23 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Dept. Of Accuracy Dept. at March 07, 2013 08:19 AM
The hottest engine choice for '63 was the fuel-injected 327, rated at 375 horses.
The method of rating hp was changed (late '60s? Don't remember for sure) and the old numbers were higher, but not 100 hp higher in the case of the 327 "fuelie."
Posted by: MrScribbler at March 07, 2013 04:24 AM (cFhY4)
Posted by: Truman North, last of the famous international playboys at March 07, 2013 08:19 AM (I2LwF)
Can't you just go away.
Posted by: Next to last of the famous international playboys at March 07, 2013 04:24 AM (YYyqq)
Posted by: Blacksheep at March 07, 2013 04:24 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: real joe at March 07, 2013 04:25 AM (PD2ad)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 07, 2013 04:25 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Jean at March 07, 2013 04:25 AM (Io7hX)
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 07, 2013 08:16 AM
I've had one on a Dyno measuring at the back wheel.
Giant difference over stand measurements
Posted by: Dept. Of Accuracy Dept. at March 07, 2013 04:26 AM (+I8Mq)
****
More like 275
Posted by: Dept. Of Accuracy Dept. at March 07, 2013 08:19 AM (+I8Mq)
No, I already looked it up at Wiki. If you want to argue whether measuring it at the clutch or at the wheel is more appropriate, then using the latter will always have a significantly lower number. But the 327 was a beast in terms of power potential.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 07, 2013 04:26 AM (LHO1A)
Posted by: real joe at March 07, 2013 04:26 AM (PD2ad)
I am just dragging myself into the land of the living after that shin-dig last night.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 07, 2013 04:26 AM (QNagW)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 07, 2013 08:25 AM (9Bj8R)
Several people were ripping Rand after he ended it. "Pussy, quitter, the GOP screwed it up again, what the fuck's wrong with them, this is why we lose, etc, etc"
And no, these were not random, late night trolls.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 07, 2013 04:26 AM (da5Wo)
Let me rephrase that, this administration wants to have the ability to assassinate American citizens on US soil without any oversight.
That gets right to the heart of it, Anna. And the fact that the entire GOP isn't up in arms about that obscene insult to due process further illustrates that they truly don't give a damn as long as they have their place at the trough.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at March 07, 2013 04:27 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Blacksheep at March 07, 2013 04:27 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 07, 2013 04:27 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Truman North, last of the famous international playboys at March 07, 2013 04:27 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Thorvald at March 07, 2013 04:27 AM (1V6Pv)
Posted by: Opus An Arcus at March 07, 2013 04:28 AM (M+l81)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 07, 2013 04:28 AM (tOkJB)
a man has his limits, some were expecting him to surpass Thurmond's record
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at March 07, 2013 04:29 AM (yAor6)
I see we were thinking the same thing at the same time.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 07, 2013 04:29 AM (LHO1A)
I think anyone making that argument is going to be very disappointed when I use that as the justification for an annual "Intellectual Property Tax" just like the annual property tax I pay on my house and land.
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at March 07, 2013 04:29 AM (VQ9KL)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 07, 2013 04:29 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: CarolT at March 07, 2013 04:29 AM (z4WKX)
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at March 07, 2013 04:30 AM (VQ9KL)
No, but if you could make perfect clones of the building for free (e.g. a large-scale version of the Trek replicators) I'd certainly advocate letting people do so after 15 years.
Posted by: Ian S. at March 07, 2013 04:31 AM (OevbG)
Posted by: Blacksheep at March 07, 2013 04:31 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at March 07, 2013 04:32 AM (VQ9KL)
Posted by: Opus An Arcus at March 07, 2013 04:33 AM (M+l81)
Just to talk.
Posted by: Opus An Arcus at March 07, 2013 08:28 AM (M+l81)
Durbin must have fluid on his brain. On the Sunday gab shows he always has this glassy look in his eyes and a slack jaw like he's not understanding a fucking thing that's coming out of his upper jizz hole and how it doesn't address any question he's been asked. Thanks a lot, Illinois, for inflicting that fucking retard on the rest of us.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 07, 2013 04:33 AM (LHO1A)
saw that- internet blowhards- I gave 'em the old 'GFY' before I signed off
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 07, 2013 04:33 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 07, 2013 04:34 AM (QNagW)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 07, 2013 04:34 AM (9Bj8R)
It's not so much Dinner that bothers me, it's more the fact that a major event was happening in their chambers regarding one from their party and they decided to bail for the Dinner anyways.
It was a small group of Rs invited to the dinner. Where were the rest?
Posted by: Retread at March 07, 2013 04:34 AM (zxitI)
179 I think last night BCochran, well except for the likes of Ballzsux, a lot of regulars had gotten a bit bleary-eyed. Got their hopes up and expected a most miraculous resurrection of the GOP in one 13 hour 'Come to Yeshua!' meeting.
I am just dragging myself into the land of the living after that shin-dig last night.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 07, 2013 08:26 AM (QNagW)
I was up late too. And I understand being somewhat disappointed. I wanted it to keep going as well. But what was on the ONT was an absolute beclowning.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 07, 2013 04:34 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at March 07, 2013 04:35 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 07, 2013 04:35 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Jones in CO at March 07, 2013 08:33 AM (8sCoq)
Pretty much what I did. Something like "Some of you are embarrassing yourselves. I'm going to bed now."
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 07, 2013 04:36 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Truman North, last of the famous international playboys at March 07, 2013 04:36 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 07, 2013 04:37 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 07, 2013 08:29 AM
I Dyno'd that Vette in 1998 and it was stock with only 11,000 miles but the age of the engine could have been a factor. It was still a VERY fast car. Not as fast as my 1998 Camaro SS. I ordered it with a 2:73 rear end. 175 mph easy.
Posted by: Dept. Of Accuracy Dept. at March 07, 2013 04:37 AM (+I8Mq)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at March 07, 2013 04:37 AM (yAor6)
BCochran, I am trying to be charitable and not create even more flame wars while not stroking drama queen egos.
http://www.cosplay.com/photo/3358497/
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 07, 2013 04:37 AM (QNagW)
Posted by: Truman North, last of the famous international playboys at March 07, 2013 04:37 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Retread at March 07, 2013 08:34 AM (zxitI)
Not invited. obama is trying to pick off the weak and invalid Posted by: Nevergiveup
Oops. Not as clear as I thought I was. I meant why weren't the rest on the Senate floor to support @SenRandPaul.
Posted by: Retread at March 07, 2013 04:39 AM (zxitI)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 07, 2013 08:37 AM (QNagW)
Good plan. I'm just still kinda stuck in "WTF???" mode.
And I like this one.
http://www.cosplay.com/photo/3357731/
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 07, 2013 04:39 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Icedog at March 07, 2013 04:40 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at March 07, 2013 04:40 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Vic at March 07, 2013 07:06 AM (53z96)
Actually, the act of creating any work automatically copyrights that work. In most cases, it does not need any explicit markings to designate it as such.
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at March 07, 2013 04:41 AM (Gkhxf)
Let's go back in time for a few paraphrases.
Joey Biden: This man will be tested by our enemies, and found wanting
Shrillery: Who do you want answering that 3:00AM phone call?
Ambassador Stevens: Will someone pick up the f*cking phone
Nakoula Basseley Nakoula: What's that droning noise outside my house?
*I might have made that last one up*
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 07, 2013 04:41 AM (Tgggp)
Nowadays, it's OPM (Other Peoples Money) and nobody cares.
Posted by: Al at March 07, 2013 04:42 AM (V70Uh)
Posted by: RM at March 07, 2013 04:44 AM (/Frlf)
Posted by: Dept. Of Accuracy Dept. at March 07, 2013 08:37 AM (+I8Mq)
Unless you blueprint an engine you're gonna have fairly significant variances in the readings and even after that there will still be some just based on things that can't be 100% the same. Sounds like you're had a least 2 very sweet rides in your life.
Listening to Mark Levin from last night: When did Bill Cosby completely lose his fucking mind?
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 07, 2013 04:45 AM (LHO1A)
I'm sick of our "representatives" giving this asshole respect he doesn't deserve. Treat him like the feculent canker sore he is.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at March 07, 2013 07:46 AM (zF6Iw)
Perfectly stated.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 07, 2013 04:46 AM (1Jaio)
"If Bill Ayers was driving a '63 'Vette toward Oklahoma City, souldBambi authorize a Hellfire?"
Bill Ayers would not drive a 63 Vette to Oklahoma City. He would be in a faded "Bundy White" Chevy van or a battered Bahama Blue and Tan Volkswagen bus.
Posted by: RM at March 07, 2013 04:51 AM (/Frlf)
I would have liked to have seen the word "Merkin" used somewhere in there.
And maybe "pustulating"....but other than that, spot on perfect.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at March 07, 2013 04:53 AM (Tgggp)
I almost forgot about Kelo!
If we want to treat IP like real estate, well thanks to the courts if the state decides your copyright would generate more tax revenue if it belonged to Disney, the authorities can seize your copyright and give it to the mouse.
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at March 07, 2013 04:56 AM (VQ9KL)
CA is not broke enough; they want to expand the Obamaphone program.
I know a lot of folks who qualify for the free phone program but don't use it. It's not because they have convictions because they are on every program known to man, but because it doesn't have enough bells and whistles.
Posted by: katya the designated driver at March 07, 2013 05:21 AM (DoZD+)
Posted by: CarolT at March 07, 2013 05:33 AM (z4WKX)
At CSpan's website, they have list of other senators that spoke during Rand's fillibuster, McConnell is on the list.
Posted by: CarolT at March 07, 2013 05:39 AM (z4WKX)
Posted by: Ezra's Equal at March 07, 2013 05:59 AM (F3Ima)
Posted by: Kerne at March 07, 2013 05:59 AM (25Udx)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie ® at March 07, 2013 06:02 AM (1hM1d)
Been thinking about the filibuster-heard-round-the-world all night and morning...surprised by my ambivalent feelings about it. While I was immediately thrilled that someone/ANYONE would make a stand against federal overreach (yes he criticized Bush along with Obama, liberal scum) and was generally happy to have something to feel good about after MONTHS of gloom and doom for our side...I was disquieted by an alliance with prog groups like Code Pink, or as Ann Coulter said in today's column: staking out Amnesty International's position.
Here's the thing - I don't want the government telling me what to do or infringing upon my privacy. However, if there was a guy like Alwaki sitting in a Starbucks drinking a $5 grande double decaf half-caf while plotting to do harm - I would WANT a hellfire jammed up his piehole. It is a very strange time - Tea Partiers aligning with anti-war factions; liberals tacitly espousing elimination of due process and targeted civilian killing, supposed conservative GOP'ers forgoing every opportunity to fight for our principles to feel loved...As Lennon said: "strange days indeed. Most peculiar, momma...whoa."
Posted by: Ezra's Equal at March 07, 2013 06:16 AM (F3Ima)
Posted by: Bill sometimes Bill from Canada at March 07, 2013 06:31 AM (/Wefq)
Posted by: sherlock at March 07, 2013 06:44 AM (xhv9C)
Second, if we have knowledge a terrorist is plotting inside the US, why can't we use regular law enforcement/counter-terrorism tactics and give that person a trial?
Posted by: noms at March 07, 2013 07:37 AM (105Wz)
If it be Your divine will, please let the NORKs hit San Francisco first.
I was thinking the same, except I'm torn between gayCentral (Frisco) or Hollywood & Vine.
Posted by: GoldWingNut at March 07, 2013 07:59 AM (WBpbp)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2883 seconds, 367 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: dogfish at March 07, 2013 03:06 AM (N2yhW)