April 02, 2013
— Gabriel Malor Happy Tuesday.
Allahpundit wrote the post, so now I don't have to. Evangelicals have been telling a story about how they were lukewarm for Romney and would have turned out in greater numbers if only the party had selected a candidate that was stronger on values.
The point of this story -- and, indeed, Huckabee's point in this instance -- is twofold: (1) lay some blame for Romney's defeat; and (2) threaten the GOP with future defeats unless evangelicals' demands are met. The problem with the story (as Allah discusses in some detail) is that it is not true. Evangelicals had a larger share of the vote in 2012 than ever before.
Which brings me to another myth of Election 2012: the claim that the election demonstrated that the GOP needs to change policies to attract new voters. I've been writing since November (see here and here) that the party has a messaging problem, not a policy problem. The chart accompanying the second claim here makes that point.
We're still going round and round about Election 2012, btw, because the first step to solving a problem is to identify the problem.
Some other news, Vermont is the first state to post the prices for insurance bought through its shiny new Obamacare exchange. "[A] family of four with an annual income of $32,000 would end up paying $45 a month out of pocket. A single person with a $40,000 income would pay $317 a month." Taxpayers, you know who's paying the difference.
I made some noise about this news story yesterday on twitter. The claim, made in the headline and repeated in quotes and paraphrases, is that the sequester is delaying cruise ship debarkation and the passengers are really mad about it. Only, if you read the story, you'll note that it is entirely based on hearsay. They "heard" that sequestration has caused the number of CBP officers to be reduced, which is forcing them to stand in line. Who'd they hear it from? Oh, some other people.
Did the reporter bother to ask DHS if the agency had reduced its workforce yet? Of course not, because if the reporter had, the story would have had to explain that sequestration-related furloughs haven't started yet. Oh, and you know what? CBP is now saying it might have no furloughs at all.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:54 AM
| Comments (420)
Post contains 397 words, total size 3 kb.
Good morning, 'rons and 'ronettes. I haven't felt like I've been giving you good value for money lately, so grab a big ol’ cup of coffee or tea, settle down and, in the immortal words of Tom “T Bone” Stankus, pilgrim, tighten your shorts and sing like the Duke:
Many people don't know that Mel Brooks' first choice for the role of washed-up gunfighter The Waco Kid in Blazing Saddles was John Wayne. Reportedly, Wayne loved the script but turned the role down, saying that if he portrayed a character so outlandish, he'd lose his fans. And the Duke knew about losing fans - he almost lost them all because of one movie.
It all started in 1955, when, dropping by the office of producer Dick Powell on the RKO lot, Wayne began reading a script called The Conqueror. The story had originally begun life the year before under the working title of "The Genghis Khan Story." Under Howard Hughes' erratic leadership, RKO - the studio responsible for King Kong, Citizen Kane and the Fred Astaire / Ginger Rogers pairing - was losing money right and left through Hughes vanity projects like Underwater!, Jet Pilot and Vendetta.* Hughes finally decided to cut his losses and go out with a bang. A script came from the pen of writer Oscar Millard ('stylized, archaic English," he called the dialogue), Powell was set to produce and direct and Marlon Brando was in negotiation to play the bloodthirsty Mongolian chieftain.
Then Wayne read the script. In 1954, he was the number one box office attraction in America. He owed RKO one more picture, and after reading The Conqueror, he was sure this was the one. "The Conqueror is a Western in some ways," he told the press. "The way the screenplay reads, it is a cowboy picture and that is how I am going to play Genghis Khan. I see him as a gunfighter." All well and good, but gunfighters didn't generally sport Fu Manchu mustaches, inches of yellow makeup and black lacquer eyebrows, all of which found their place on Wayne's face when shooting began. The lovely Susan Hayward was cast as Bortai, a Tartar princess whose very being inflames Khan with lust, and found the entire experience a hoot. "Me, a red-haired Tartar princess! It looked like some wild Irishman had stopped off on the road to Cathay."
Filming began in Utah, near the town of St. George, the scenic canyon lands surrounding the village being a Hollywood replacement for the Gobi Desert. Almost immediately, cast and crew began dropping like flies in the 120-degree sunshine. When writer Millard flew out to Utah for some script changes, he found the set in utter disarray, having nearly been wiped out by a flash flood. As for the Duke, Millard sneered, "His performance drunk or sober was the way other actors tend to perform if drunk." Millard's petty comment was made shortly after Wayne's death, but by that time, everyone knew that it wasn't just Wayne's complete unsuitability for the role of Genghis Khan that had doomed The Conqueror - it was Millard's ridiculous script.
Imagine Duke Wayne, with his Western drawl, trying to keep a straight face while telling Hayward, "Yer beautiful in yer wrath! I shall keep you, and, in responding to my passions, yer hatred will kindle into love!" Or when, after Khan's right hand man Jamuga says of Hayward, "There is no limit to her perfidy!", Wayne is obliged to reply, "She is a wuh-man - much wuh-man! Should her perfidy be less than that of other wimmen?"
Had Brando taken the role of Khan, say film critics Harry and Michael Medved, "The Method Man. . .(might have lent) a touch of high-camp intensity to Oscar Milland's mock-Shakespearean lines." But Wayne's effort was doomed from the start. The Conqueror was budgeted at $6 million.** An additional $1.4 million came from the pockets of Howard Hughes himself, funding a PR campaign to lure audiences in. But even with Wayne's name attached, The Conqueror barely managed to eke out $4.5 million in business.
Having run RKO into the ground, Hughes sold it. One year later, he spent $12 million dollars to buy back the master prints of two of the 700 films in the studio's library: Jet Pilot and The Conqueror, withdrawing them from circulation. According to aides, for the next twenty years, if the eccentric mogul wasn't screening Ice Station Zebra, he would watch The Conqueror. By himself. For hundreds, if not thousands, of times.
"Maybe he just really enjoyed it," you shrug. And perhaps you're right. But there's tragedy attached to this movie; a tragedy which makes you wonder whether Hughes actually bought back The Conqueror out of a sense of guilt.
You see, in 1953, the government had exploded eleven nuclear devices at the testing grounds of Yucca Flat, Nevada, a mere 130-odd miles away from little St. George. Known as "Operation Upshot-Knothole," the cumulative effect of the blasts spread radioactive fallout through the region, but the federal government assured both the film crew and the residents of St. George that the tests were not a hazard to public health. So the movie's cast and crew spent their shoot unknowingly "frolicking through atomically charged dust storms" and eating contaminated food and water. To make matters worse, when shooting moved to Hollywood, Hughes had sixty tons of the poisonous dirt shipped to a sound stage for retakes.
Since the filming of The Conqueror, nearly half the population of St. George has developed one form or another of cancer. Of the 220 people who worked in Utah on the production, 91 were known to have contracted cancer and at least 46 to have died from it. John Wayne, Susan Hayward and Dick Powell, too, all fought long, losing battles against cancer. By 1974, when Agnes Moorhead (who played Wayne's mother Hunlun in the movie) was diagnosed with uterine cancer, rumors had already begun to spread through Hollywood about the "death movie." "Everybody in that picture has gotten cancer and died," she told her friend Jeanne Gerson.*** Reportedly, as Moorhead was dying, she moaned, "I should have never taken that part."
And until his own death in 1976, Hughes locked himself away in a room illuminated only by one flickering light, watching The Conqueror over and over and over. . .
Now, thereÂ’s a story. Hope you enjoyed that, and I hope you all have a wonderful day.
*RKOs only real hit during the Hughes years was The Outlaw, but it was a sideways success. Hughes had been grooming actor Jack Beutel for stardom, but it was buxom Jane Russell who captured the world's attention and reduced Beutel to the status of a trivia answer.
**making it, in cost conversion, a little short of the $40 million spent on Michael Cimino's legendary disaster Heaven's Gate.
***who herself played Hayward's nurse in the movie and would die from breast cancer.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 02, 2013 03:00 AM (zF6Iw)
Hardly "angelical".
Posted by: Vic at April 02, 2013 03:01 AM (53z96)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 03:01 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: Popcorn at April 02, 2013 03:03 AM (uIpSF)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 03:08 AM (tqLft)
Didn't Hughes later sue the US government in order to try to stop nuc. testing in Nevada? Seems I read that years ago.
Posted by: HH at April 02, 2013 03:10 AM (XXwdv)
Posted by: Huckster at April 02, 2013 03:11 AM (FsUAO)
But I had completely forgotten about it until today.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at April 02, 2013 03:11 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: GOP Genius at April 02, 2013 03:11 AM (+kznc)
Wow. What a story. Rolling it over in my head how to make that into a movie...
Glad you liked it, J.J. I'll be generous and just settle for a "story by" credit. :-)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 02, 2013 03:12 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 03:13 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: Y-not no longer drunk at April 02, 2013 03:14 AM (EcpFD)
Posted by: Harlekwin15-Emergency back Up Angst ID at April 02, 2013 03:14 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at April 02, 2013 03:14 AM (UTq/I)
I'm not sure where the lies come from, but that right there tells me there are people who WANT to be lied to, and will bend over backwards to make sure the truth never gets between their ears.
Posted by: BurtTC at April 02, 2013 03:15 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: Huckster at April 02, 2013 03:15 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 03:16 AM (4nopz)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at April 02, 2013 03:16 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: Miss Marple at April 02, 2013 03:16 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 02, 2013 03:16 AM (d0Dmj)
Posted by: Klawnet at April 02, 2013 03:17 AM (cdgHW)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 03:17 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: Mr. Pink aka a man without a political party at April 02, 2013 03:17 AM (++kZl)
Posted by: Y-not no longer drunk at April 02, 2013 03:17 AM (EcpFD)
They missed their flight because of the back-up, and the airlines wouldn't put them on another plane because United said it wasn't their fault. So they had to rent a car and drive back to Indy.
Posted by: Miss Marple at April 02, 2013 03:18 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Gem at April 02, 2013 03:18 AM (zw+pb)
Posted by: Icedog at April 02, 2013 03:19 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: GOP Genius at April 02, 2013 07:11 AM (+kznc)
You're one of those snarky extremists aren't you?
Posted by: Karl Rove LLC at April 02, 2013 03:20 AM (Cs2tJ)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 02, 2013 03:21 AM (d0Dmj)
Posted by: tony redenzo at April 02, 2013 03:22 AM (1MsBy)
Myth Romney lost. A closer look at the polls actually proves that he won!
Conclusion: pick the same kind of guy next time.
Posted by: GOP Genius at April 02, 2013 07:11 AM (+kznc)
I don't think that's the answer. Nor, as near as I can tell, does anyone else.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 03:23 AM (jZUEZ)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 03:23 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: Y-not no longer drunk at April 02, 2013 03:24 AM (EcpFD)
Posted by: Mr. Pink aka a man without a political party at April 02, 2013 03:24 AM (++kZl)
Maybe conservatives and conservative media should stop going on and on over and over about how single women are worthless pieces of shit ruining the country.
Every. Fucking. Day.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ drinking heavily at April 02, 2013 03:24 AM (hO8IJ)
http://tinyurl.com/blgnzak
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 02, 2013 03:25 AM (ztdrb)
Posted by: Y-not no longer drunk at April 02, 2013 03:25 AM (EcpFD)
Democrats are smart enough to message using straw men and to focus on what they are for.
"We democrats are for civil rights." - this means republicans must be for slavery.
"We democrats are for education" - republicans, on the other hand, must want the poor to stay stupid.
Although it's a simple method of painting your opposition in a bad light, our consultants haven't learned how to do this.
Posted by: jwest at April 02, 2013 03:26 AM (u2a4R)
worse we have unlearned it....
"I want to be fair..."
Mitt Romney
"then go into reffing chess matches..."
//Sven
Posted by: Harlekwin15-Emergency back Up Angst ID at April 02, 2013 03:27 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Y-not iphone challenged at April 02, 2013 03:28 AM (EcpFD)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 03:28 AM (tqLft)
We know what didn't work in '08 - John McCain - and what did work in '08 - Sarah Palin.
Then we completely ignored the lessons of '08 and nominated another McCain in '12, with some idiots buying the line that it was Gov. Palin that cost us the '08 election.
By '16 the liberals will be telling us that it was Ryan that cost us '12, and we should nominate another moderate to appeal to the center. The worst part is a lot of Republicans will buy it.
Posted by: egd at April 02, 2013 03:30 AM (XVGEg)
Posted by: Mr. Pink aka a man without a political party at April 02, 2013 03:31 AM (++kZl)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 02, 2013 03:31 AM (ZshNr)
I know that when someone offers me gold on a plate or some nice pyrite I always choose the pyrite...
Posted by: Harlekwin15-Emergency back Up Angst ID at April 02, 2013 03:31 AM (LRFds)
Wasn't there a low budget nuclear horror movie called Beast of Yucca Flats? Yes there was. I wonder.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 02, 2013 03:31 AM (ztdrb)
"...with some idiots buying the line that it was Gov. Palin that cost us the '08 election."
To be fair, Ace is having second thoughts about that.
Posted by: jwest at April 02, 2013 03:32 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 02, 2013 03:32 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Bigby's Bunny-Ear Fingers at April 02, 2013 03:32 AM (DrfKr)
Posted by: Huckster at April 02, 2013 03:33 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 03:34 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 02, 2013 03:35 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Icedog at April 02, 2013 03:35 AM (9ScGj)
"No he's not. He doesn't think she's the GOP's savior, much like I don't either."
Posted by: Huckster at April 02, 2013 07:33 AM (FsUAO)
Well, we know Ace has the capacity to learn, so there is still hope for him.
Posted by: jwest at April 02, 2013 03:36 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: zsasz at April 02, 2013 03:36 AM (7FoiD)
Typically, cartel operatives are not U.S. citizens and make no attempt to acquire visas, choosing instead to sneak across the border. They are so accustomed to slipping back and forth between the two countries that they regularly return home for family weddings and holidays, Riley said.
http://is.gd/pkfenz
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ drinking heavily at April 02, 2013 03:36 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: Y-not iphone challenged at April 02, 2013 03:36 AM (Bpn3R)
Posted by: Up and cummers #14 at April 02, 2013 03:37 AM (9sjmH)
We lost on the black and Hispanic vote who went Oshit by 95% and 70%
Romney lost by a lower margin than McShitty did.
Posted by: Vic at April 02, 2013 03:39 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Bigby's Bunny-Ear Fingers at April 02, 2013 03:39 AM (DrfKr)
Posted by: Mr. Pink aka a man without a political party at April 02, 2013 03:40 AM (++kZl)
The British military did succeed in liberating the islands. Though the cost in men and material was not something to be dismissed lightly. Argentina's conscript army was quickly routed by a smaller but professional military the British fielded. It also helped that Britain had air superiority over the islands. After the sinking of General Belgrano, ex US light cruiser Phoenix, the Argentine navy stayed in port while the Argentine mainland had to worry about another Black Buck mission.
As a result of their catastrophic defeat in the Falklands campaign, the military junta of Argentina quickly collapsed. Thus it can be argued that Britain helped liberate Argentina from a military dictatorship. Which is something the current President of Argentina should reflect on as she rattles her rusty saber over the same islands for the same reasons as the junta.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 02, 2013 03:40 AM (ztdrb)
Dana Loesch covered the Repub outreach to younger voters beautifully. She filled in for Beck on TV yesterday and had three 20-something politicos talk about ways they could make inroads, and they were great. No one in "leadership" is listening to them. There's one mention of social media in Rinsed Preibus's autopsy report -- and that's to reach donors.
Pro-tip: Ease up on the Oak Ridge Boys' heavy rotation at campaign events.
Posted by: RushBabe at April 02, 2013 03:41 AM (orY9d)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at April 02, 2013 03:41 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 02, 2013 03:42 AM (8sCoq)
>>>>By '16 the liberals will be telling us that it was Ryan that cost us '12, and we should nominate another moderate to appeal to the center. The worst part is a lot of Republicans will buy it.
Scott Brown for President or Bust 2016!!
It's a sure fire win this time!!
Posted by: Dave C at April 02, 2013 03:43 AM (8Mvv6)
Posted by: Y-not iphone challenged at April 02, 2013 03:43 AM (Bpn3R)
Posted by: a mindful webworker woke up draggy at April 02, 2013 03:44 AM (i5xnd)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 03:44 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: Icedog at April 02, 2013 03:45 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: Dr Foistus at April 02, 2013 03:45 AM (u6nf+)
Posted by: Mr. Pink aka a man without a political party at April 02, 2013 03:46 AM (++kZl)
As much as I'm a fan of Palin, she isn't the GOP's savior either.
Someone who is Palin-like though.. Can be.
Posted by: Dave C at April 02, 2013 03:47 AM (8Mvv6)
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 02, 2013 03:49 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 03:49 AM (4nopz)
Posted by: Vic at April 02, 2013 03:49 AM (53z96)
Posted by: Icedog at April 02, 2013 03:49 AM (9ScGj)
Watched an HBO documentary over the weekend about some lower to middle class people caught up in the economy, losing their jobs and now losing their homes.
It was clear that the democrats wanted to help these people, but for some reason, the republicans wanted them homeless.
They didn't explain why the republicans benefitted from these people being on the street, but it was clear it brought them great joy seeing people with their utilities shut off and being forclosed on.
Posted by: jwest at April 02, 2013 03:49 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 02, 2013 03:50 AM (Cnqmv)
My left nut for the GOP senator to go to the floor and defend their base rather than dismiss them as hobbits.
It's not that difficult. "Wanting the federal government to live within it's means isn't extreme. It's what families try to do every day."
"To want to enforce the border the same way Mexico enforces theirs isn't extreme."
Posted by: Dave C at April 02, 2013 03:51 AM (8Mvv6)
All this pity party circular firing squad will ensure one thing from me, knock me out of the Top 10 posting. Because you are so totally harshing my mellow all these Moriartys.
Anyway back to writing. Words do not write themselves. And even knowing my 'hero' is going to die at the end is far more cheerful than here.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 02, 2013 03:51 AM (ztdrb)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 03:51 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: Icedog at April 02, 2013 03:52 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at April 02, 2013 03:52 AM (FsUAO)
One of the "outreach" tips on reaching college kids was to hold a Republican Job Fair on campus and offer resume-writing help as well as making contacts in the Obama Economy. This stuff is easy -- esp. rubbing it in Da Won's face about the stinking economy/job market. You know the progs would do it in a heartbeat; the R's would probably tell you that would be rude.
Posted by: RushBabe at April 02, 2013 03:52 AM (orY9d)
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 02, 2013 03:53 AM (8sCoq)
Time to jump on the treadmill.
You don't maintain a god-like figure sitting behind a desk.
Right behind ya. Although in my case, the god is Buddha.
Posted by: RushBabe at April 02, 2013 03:54 AM (orY9d)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 03:54 AM (tqLft)
Don't try some journalistic feint to hide the fact that a more conservative Nominee would've garnered MORE votes.
Of course Romney got an increased amount. He was running against an avowed marxist muslim and they knew it.
So more decided to bite the bullet and vote EVEN THOUGH THEY KNEW ROMNEY WAS GOING TO SELL THEM OUT.
Because they also knew that Obama was going to do . . . well, exactly what he HAS done.
And we won't identify the problem as long as the RINOS keep claiming we just have to change our messaging. It ain't the messaging friend, it's the fact that Republicans have lied and flipped and "evolved" and gained "strange new respect" once they get to DC and are under the control of the Establishment guys.
Well, not to worry. After getting them in in 2010 and they dithered around and helped them keep the House in 2012, they don't have any political capital to spend on SoCons.
It's gonna be:
SEE YA, WOULDN'T WANT TO BE YA in 2016 for the liberal Republican Party.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at April 02, 2013 03:55 AM (Kpn/z)
Posted by: Icedog at April 02, 2013 03:55 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: teej at April 02, 2013 03:56 AM (Nsomq)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 02, 2013 03:58 AM (R/0gY)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 02, 2013 03:59 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 04:00 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: panzernashorn at April 02, 2013 04:00 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 02, 2013 04:00 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: The Generic, Award Winning Moron at April 02, 2013 04:03 AM (+I8Mq)
Posted by: Truman North at April 02, 2013 04:03 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: zsasz at April 02, 2013 04:04 AM (MMC8r)
I'd be happier if Republicans didn't "evolve" once they get into office!
Posted by: Hrothgar
Well, it's not as if the Republicans would do something like -- say -- join with Democrats in a Blue State bi-partisan gun grab.
They might go native on most issues, but at least we can trust them on certain fundamental constitutional rights,
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at April 02, 2013 04:05 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: panzernashorn at April 02, 2013 04:05 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 02, 2013 04:06 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 02, 2013 04:07 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ drinking heavily
Yea conservatives do have a tendancy to state the obvious. Before you bitch at me I'm a woman so don't even go there. Young single women are total worthless pieces of shit most of the time. They usually act like they are entitled to something special because they sit down to pee and...maybe because their eggs haven't dried up yet, I don't know. This is especially noticeable in the northeast where I am.
Posted by: Jaimo at April 02, 2013 04:07 AM (9U1OG)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at April 02, 2013 04:07 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: Truman North at April 02, 2013 04:08 AM (I2LwF)
More like someone you're repulsed by.
The opposite of love isn't hate, it's indifference or despising.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at April 02, 2013 04:08 AM (Kpn/z)
Posted by: Truman North at April 02, 2013 04:09 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Princess Pukia at April 02, 2013 04:09 AM (i7B17)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at April 02, 2013 04:09 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: Jaimo at April 02, 2013 04:09 AM (9U1OG)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 04:10 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at April 02, 2013 04:10 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: The Generic, Award Winning Moron at April 02, 2013 04:11 AM (+I8Mq)
Posted by: Trojan Man at April 02, 2013 04:13 AM (i7B17)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 04:13 AM (4nopz)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at April 02, 2013 04:14 AM (FsUAO)
The perception of the Democrats among LIVs is that they fight, they are unified, and they win. And it's true. That is not perception -- that's reality. The message is secondary.
The perception of the Republicans among LIVs is that they are accommodationist and do not present a unified front, and certainly don't fight for what they believe in. And it's true.
Until they present themselves as winners, or losers fighting valiantly and together, they will always lose.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 02, 2013 04:14 AM (0zDXv)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 02, 2013 04:15 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 04:15 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 04:16 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 02, 2013 07:59 AM (JDIKC)
In refutation?
This single woman is clearly not worthless
http://tinyurl.com/b7bqns9
NSFW
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 02, 2013 04:16 AM (0zDXv)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 02, 2013 04:17 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Case at April 02, 2013 04:17 AM (GxTMf)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 04:18 AM (ZbSTK)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at April 02, 2013 04:18 AM (FsUAO)
B. The NYT does not know what Easter is. Check Twitchy. Just...wow.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 02, 2013 04:18 AM (kNqmp)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 02, 2013 04:19 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Truman North at April 02, 2013 04:19 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Zombie Howard Hughes at April 02, 2013 04:19 AM (qG1i2)
>>>There was debate on teh blogs, but I think politicians heeded the political winds and voted for it.
IIRC, the threat in TARP was there would be tanks in the streets and they thought they had to do it to prevent that. When TFG got in office he sat with Stephanopoloser and was laughing about the economy - which, looking back, wasn't necessarily crazy-laughing or nic-fitting but could have been a realization that TARP didn't work and tanks are going on the streets anyhow.
Regardless, thats where I think we're headed still judging by purchases made across the board by governmental agencies.
My point though: It wasn't sold as political but as necessary to stave off total collapse.
Posted by: Bigby's Iron Fist at April 02, 2013 04:19 AM (3ZtZW)
2008 election - 69.5M vs 60M D US pop 304M
2012 election - 66M vs 61M D US pop 313M
If D turnout was as high in 2004 as it was in 2008 and 2012 Bush would have lost.
Yeah turnout was the key, Dem turnout.
Posted by: Vic at April 02, 2013 04:20 AM (53z96)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 04:21 AM (4nopz)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at April 02, 2013 04:21 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: Snake Oil Baron at April 02, 2013 04:22 AM (RKeHi)
The one where a family of four pays 12% of the health premiums of a single person.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at April 02, 2013 04:22 AM (kNqmp)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at April 02, 2013 04:22 AM (FsUAO)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 02, 2013 08:14 AM (0zDXv)
FIFY
PS.
I capitalize because I'm too lazy and afeered of the barrel to mess around with brackets just to have italics.
Not because I'm a raving maniac. I can still hide that pretty well.
SO FAR
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at April 02, 2013 04:23 AM (Kpn/z)
Posted by: a mindful webworker at April 02, 2013 04:23 AM (qG1i2)
If the press, movies, schools and Planned Unparenthood are all telling the ladies that the Rs hate them and want them to be baby making machines for misogynists, any misstep on our part only confirms the bias.
Posted by: typo dynamofo at April 02, 2013 04:23 AM (WVMUQ)
Yeah with a LOT of shenanigans and underhanded crap from the State Parties.
How about VA primary with nobody on the ballot but Romney and Paul? How about the GOP stacking blue States up front year after year?
How about Romney getting all the State delegates when he only won 30% of the vote.
I will tell you one thing Gabe, I have voted for the "its my turn GOP candidate" for the last time.
No fucking more.
Posted by: Vic at April 02, 2013 04:24 AM (53z96)
Posted by: dogfish at April 02, 2013 04:25 AM (N2yhW)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 02, 2013 04:25 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 04:25 AM (4nopz)
Posted by: Tsar Nicholas II at April 02, 2013 04:25 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Truman North at April 02, 2013 04:26 AM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 02, 2013 04:26 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 04:27 AM (4nopz)
MP4, like the stories... but... I'm still having a hard time living with the image of date rape bdsm Detective Joe Friday!
Posted by: a mindful webworker at April 02, 2013 08:23 AM (qG1i2)
If that sounds ooky, then don't ever ask me for the story about the MGM-financed brothel with a Shirley Temple lookalike. . .
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 02, 2013 04:28 AM (zF6Iw)
No fucking more.
Posted by: Vic at April 02, 2013 08:24 AM (53z96)
THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS
Gabe if you have contacts in the GOP, show this to them.^^^^
We're mad as hell, and we're not going to take it anymore.
It's as simple as that. Let them figure out what to do about it.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at April 02, 2013 04:28 AM (Kpn/z)
@Truman North,
On TARP.
What we need is congressmen who come back to their districts every so often, like more than once every 2 years when it's reelection time. Redistricting may have given us the house majority but it's also given us a set of professional politicians, something the founding fathers were not expecting.
Posted by: tsrblke at April 02, 2013 04:28 AM (GaqMa)
Let the barrel love you. Open your heart to its means of gentle, if somewhat unsanitary, correction. Remember, there can be no forgiveness without penance.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at April 02, 2013 04:29 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 02, 2013 04:29 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Truman North at April 02, 2013 04:30 AM (7NWvp)
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at April 02, 2013 04:30 AM (FsUAO)
Again, there is no evidence that this is true. Romney won the GOP nomination with a majority of primary votes.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor
Romney had been running for President for at least 8 years. He had a massive advantage in financing, name recognition and GOP insider support.
And still a former Senator and a guy who made pizzas for a living managed to keep the race going until the latest decision since Ford edged out Reagan in '76.
Evidence, you guys.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at April 02, 2013 04:30 AM (kdS6q)
Gabe -
In saying the base voted for the VP I'm saying the base found the VP selection more compelling than the candidate in two cycles now. The VP is not part of the Primaries process, so to attempt to refute the claim as you have is an apples/oranges problem. Its anecdotal but there's no one lionizing McCain or thinking Romney is in any way vital to the GOP's future, yet there is a contigent saying that about both Palin and Ryan.
Posted by: Bigby's Iron Fist at April 02, 2013 04:31 AM (3ZtZW)
Let's be honest; There is a 0% chance that claiming that women shouldn't vote or blaming women for the votes of the past (regardless of numbers) will convince them to vote the way you wish.
Posted by: typo dynamofo at April 02, 2013 04:31 AM (WVMUQ)
This is the first correct usage of this axiom that I've ever seen on this blog....or anywhere in the internet for that matter.
The pedant in me thanks you from the bottom of its cold, dark heart.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at April 02, 2013 04:31 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 02, 2013 04:31 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 02, 2013 04:31 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Wodun at April 02, 2013 04:32 AM (PEpU8)
Huntsman?!?!
Posted by: HoboJerky, now with 74% more DOOM! at April 02, 2013 08:30 AM (FsUAO)
Nah, too far right. Jeb my man, Jeb...
Posted by: Karl Rove LLC at April 02, 2013 04:32 AM (Cs2tJ)
Posted by: Truman North at April 02, 2013 04:32 AM (7NWvp)
I'm trying to figure out how a guy who went through 20 debates in an endless primary against consistently under-performing candidates becomes the "it's my turn" candidate.
Seriously, can you help me with that?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at April 02, 2013 04:33 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 02, 2013 04:34 AM (8sCoq)
This is probably the only political option open to the Rs. Sure everybody says we hate you but they hate you more. And we have cookies. Come to the dark side.
Same with minorities. "Yeah, we aren't nice but how are those Dem cities treating you? And we'll give you money to send your kids to the rich kid school."
Posted by: typo dynamofo at April 02, 2013 04:34 AM (WVMUQ)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 04:35 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 04:35 AM (4nopz)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 08:25 AM (4nopz)
There's a bit of a mean streak in a lot of Christians.
They'll warn you about the fire but if you keep sticking your hand in it, they'll finally let you and let the outcome be your punishment for ignoring them.
Christians love this country but they're not concerned enough to jeopardize their own salvation. Therefore they figure if it's God's will that the US gets taken down due to it's arrogant, baby murdering and deviancy embracing ways then SO BE IT.
Yeah, they know they'll be a part of the misery but they've absorbed revelations since they were 5, it's not gonna be a surprise.
They figure they'll eventually be resurrected and with Jesus no matter what happens on this earthly plane.
This is MY perception of how I think they think. YMMV
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at April 02, 2013 04:35 AM (Kpn/z)
>>>Honestly, I'm sick of politics. I want someone with principles; someone who can articulate them with passion and is not afraid to stand by them.
This.
Its also why the VP has been more popular in two cycles. They're allowed to fight.
Posted by: Bigby's Iron Fist at April 02, 2013 04:37 AM (3ZtZW)
Indeed.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at April 02, 2013 04:37 AM (sbV1u)
"I've been writing since November...that the party has a messaging problem"
I'd say "mental problem", but that would be racist or something.
I denounce myself.
"Republicans joke about attacks like this but after 40 years of not fighting back against them, people believe the lies."
This is the key that so many on the Right seem to be totally unwilling to address - the befuddling unwillingness to punch back, brought to full flower under Bush and now Bohener, now leaves the way clear for every blow to land hard, fast, and hurtful. It's as if the GOP somehow belives "politics" to be a polite parlor game, perhaps carried out after a stirring round of whist, followed by a spirited discussion of marginal rates over gin and tonics...
while the Left sees politics as what it is: a part of life worth fighting for.
Posted by: Kitty Frontage formerly known as Jess1 at April 02, 2013 04:38 AM (lbiWb)
Now is the time when every group starts jockeying for love and attention next time by claiming they were neglected last time. I'm a Libertarian you have to appeal to me! I'm an evangelical, you have to appeal to me! I'm a single mother, you have to appeal to me!
What, no love for us Arrogant Dickbags?
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 02, 2013 04:38 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Thorvald at April 02, 2013 04:38 AM (1V6Pv)
Whoever was the liberal but got swamped or didn't make the initial cut.
Pence or one them other midwesterners.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at April 02, 2013 04:39 AM (Kpn/z)
Who would be "next in line" in '16? Huntsman?!?!
Posted by: HoboJerky
A member of the Bush family TBD.
It's like alternate side of the street parking on street-cleaning day.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at April 02, 2013 04:40 AM (kdS6q)
The Arrogant Dickbag Party.
Cut. Jib. Newsletter?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at April 02, 2013 04:41 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 02, 2013 04:41 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 04:41 AM (4nopz)
Why would they risk something eternal for something temporary?
Posted by: GMan at April 02, 2013 04:41 AM (sxq57)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 02, 2013 04:41 AM (bZKG0)
Posted by: luigi vercotti at April 02, 2013 04:42 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 04:42 AM (tqLft)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 04:42 AM (4nopz)
Posted by: panzernashorn at April 02, 2013 04:42 AM (MhA4j)
So has waiting this long been a tough roe to ho for you?
the other favorite is tow the line.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at April 02, 2013 04:43 AM (Kpn/z)
Seriously, can you help me with that?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at April 02, 2013 08:33 AM (sbV1u)
You stated the problem already. But you left out who hosted all those stupid non-debates.
AND they are going to do it AGAIN. Fuck them. if they do not change the primary system this time they can kiss my ass.
Posted by: Vic at April 02, 2013 04:43 AM (53z96)
For all the complaints about Palin, she's the only one who has consistently delivered jabs to the donks that have hit home. I think that's why a lot of people like her because she does something that, either by plan or otherwise, the others just don't do.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 02, 2013 04:44 AM (ahT6Z)
Posted by: Bigby's Iron Fist at April 02, 2013 08:40 AM (3ZtZW)
She's on board and excited. Very excited if you get my drift....
Posted by: Karl Rove LLC at April 02, 2013 04:44 AM (Cs2tJ)
>>>The US is not synonymous with the Kingdom of God.
No, indeed. Scripture holds that all Nations will be against Israel at some point and all Nations shall be punished for it. The USA is no different and the barrel cometh.
Posted by: Bigby's Iron Fist at April 02, 2013 04:44 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Blacksheep at April 02, 2013 04:44 AM (bS6uW)
Posted by: Boone at April 02, 2013 04:44 AM (tIyK2)
Morning, all!
We might as well get used to the DOPE blaming evangelicals for Romney's loss last year. They've decided it was those bigoted religious types who refused to turn out for a Mormon, and nothing will dissuade them from that bone. They refuse to take a long, hard look at any of the other explanations, no matter how many times this is debunked. They've adopted the ostrich defense.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Hobbit [/s][/b][/u][/i] at April 02, 2013 04:45 AM (4df7R)
Bullshit. People have been pitching a version of that almost every day since the election (often in the morning's THC post), and evangelicals and others have constantly had to be on defense from it with the actual data.
The final data also says that Romney didn't lose women, although it was fairly close. The real stay-homes, as I understand it, were the blue collar types.
Posted by: Ian S. at April 02, 2013 04:45 AM (OevbG)
Posted by: zsasz at April 02, 2013 04:45 AM (MMC8r)
Mitt's major selling points were 1) didn't rock the boat...
That was pretty much it. Under a Mittens administration all the GOP "leadership" would've stayed intact.
Bleh.
Posted by: Kitty Frontage formerly known as Jess1 at April 02, 2013 04:46 AM (lbiWb)
Posted by: The Generic, Award Winning Moron at April 02, 2013 04:46 AM (+I8Mq)
Posted by: The Generic, Award Winning Moron at April 02, 2013 04:47 AM (+I8Mq)
Posted by: The Generic, Award Winning Moron at April 02, 2013 04:47 AM (+I8Mq)
The people who comment here that women shouldn't vote are utterly ludicrous. If they're suggesting that suffrage should be repealed- they're delusional and an embarrassment to conservatives and have mommy or wife issues
In an ideal world - Alextopia, say - universal suffrage would be repealed. "Julians" fuck up as many votes as the "Julias."
But we're still left with the problem-how does the right appeal to women?
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 08:35 AM (4nopz)
How do you beat the Sugar Daddy Party?
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 02, 2013 04:47 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 04:48 AM (4nopz)
I don't know that you can take the Republican primary results as a ringing endorsement of the base, Gabe.
For one, the primaries are spread out over the space of months. Candidates were dropping out after the early primaries, so you didn't have a uniform field across the entire primary season.
Another, Mitt Romney won 52% of the overall primary vote (out of 19 million total votes cast). I would call that grudging acceptance, not outright enthusiasm. Plus, a fair portion of that vote was received after it became clear that neither Santorum nor Gingrich were going to be able to get enough delegates in the remaining primary states to be competitive. So IMO the primary voters coalesced around Romney because no other candidate had the organization to be competitive and was sold as a guy who had the best chance to win the general, not because the primary voters were overly enthusiastic about the guy.
And yes, Vic mentioned some odd things, including where the VA Republicans only had Romney and Paul on the primary ballot. That's skewing the vote results. Let's not also forget the states which have open primaries, and by definition those wouldn't be representative of "the base."
When the Democrats would lose elections they would trot out the excuse that it's not their policies that are the issue, but the messaging. I ridiculed it back then and I ridicule the excuse when it's offered now. The reality is we've reached the tipping point where the FSA bloc can now impact elections.
Posted by: @JohnTant at April 02, 2013 04:48 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: The Generic, Award Winning Moron at April 02, 2013 04:48 AM (+I8Mq)
Posted by: luigi vercotti at April 02, 2013 04:48 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: Jones in CO at April 02, 2013 04:49 AM (8sCoq)
So then you're saying the the Republican base is susceptible to the "it's my turn" approach? That sort of undermines the argument that we pick the wrong guy if it's the base picking that guy.
Ditto for "moderate appeal." The primaries are where the base comes out. If they vote for the "moderate" then that's who they want.
As far as "organization" goes. That's what it takes to run. Period. If you as a candidate cannot assemble a deep and capable organization, then you probably don't deserve to win. Mitt demonstrated this by pissing endless gobs of money away on consultants for no return...as well as the debacle that was ORCA.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at April 02, 2013 04:50 AM (sbV1u)
Still think there are some policy/platform issues that need work and that hurt Republicans. However, I agree with the overall point here.
We did not lose by that much this past November. If we had better turnout from our "base" Romney would have won. Understandably, Republicans are frustrated with their candidates and with the party. I'm sure many Democrats share this frustration with their candidates as well. However, I think the core Democrat voters (we know who they are) do not stay home to send a message that they demand a more ideologically pure candidate or one more aligned with their particular hot button issue.
Posted by: RM at April 02, 2013 04:50 AM (/Frlf)
I am a little confused how any voter, including Evangelicals advance their cause by sitting home. Provided empirical data supports any of these claims- how's this working our for you now. Ya know, as opposed to the evil Mormon Romney?
Choosing not to vote is still a choice.
Posted by: Marcus at April 02, 2013 04:51 AM (xZ56R)
The political calculus on this isn't even very hard. Romney believes in Jesus. Obama believes in some combination of himself, Islam, and Reggie's cock.
Posted by: Ian S. at April 02, 2013 04:51 AM (OevbG)
#210,
Exactly, Cap'n! RWR was pretty darn good at slicing and dicing his way thru DC, to the point that Clifford's remark was laughed AT, not WITH by late nighters, comics, etc.
Palin, to this day, lives in the heads of leftists rent free - witness the silly Reuters blog post the other day ranting on her...
Posted by: Kitty Frontage formerly known as Jess1 at April 02, 2013 04:51 AM (lbiWb)
I held my nose and voted for Palin (McCain), and again for Ryan (Romney), against my brother's wise advice both times. In 2016? As Papa Bush would say: "Not gonna do it. Wouldn't be prudent."
I don't care if the Ds run Fauxcohontas, Her Royal Commie-ness, Joe "BFD" Biden, or Al effin' Franken. I'm through with the GOP as long as McCain, Graham, Boehner, et. al, are running the show. Calvin Coolidge or bust.
And when the country really starts going to the pooper, well, you may all go to hell, and I will go to Texas.
Posted by: RLTW at April 02, 2013 04:52 AM (zA0eu)
Pray FOR not to contribute to their sin.
It's why most Christians won't vote for an abortion proponent. They could be the next thing to Jesus but if they approve of abortion then they AIN'T.
there's other qualifiers but I'm not going to go down the list.
Suffice it to say that to some, voting for an abortion approving (which Romney did) Mormon (which he is) was a bit too far to stretch for what seems to be the inevitable WRATH OF GOD being wreaked upon this nation in the form of a crypto muslim marxist.
Like I said, I'm not their spokesman, I've just hung out with enough and believe some of what they believe and heard all the sermons so I think I have a feel for how they think.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at April 02, 2013 04:52 AM (Kpn/z)
He represents the Huckabee Wallet Foundation and nothing else.
Just another asshole with an angle to exploit.
Posted by: The Generic, Award Winning Moron at April 02, 2013 04:54 AM (+I8Mq)
Vic, it sounds like you think the rules were bent to favor Romney. So your solution is to bend the rules to favor "your guy," whoever your guy might be in any given year.
I just don't think this is nefarious. Everyone knows the rules going in, and what it will take to compete. If they can't compete then that's a knock on them, not on the guy who figured it out.
For the record, I wasn't a Romney guy.
Posted by: Sean Bannion at April 02, 2013 04:54 AM (sbV1u)
If this has already been posted, I apologize, but look at Drudge right now. CT wants to say who can buy ammo or not.
No eligibility certificate for ammo purchases? No ammo for you!
Posted by: EC at April 02, 2013 04:54 AM (GQ8sn)
He represents the Huckabee Wallet Foundation and nothing else.
This, this, a million times this.
Posted by: Ian S. at April 02, 2013 04:54 AM (OevbG)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 02, 2013 04:56 AM (g2ldK)
So I would conclude, the American voter largely likes the way things are going. That includes those who sat home and didn't vote because the latest episode of Survivor was on or they got a new Xbox.
Posted by: Marcus at April 02, 2013 04:56 AM (xZ56R)
"And when the country really starts going to the pooper, well, you may all go to hell, and I will go to Texas."
As are we. (DRUMROOOLLLL)
After nearly four hundred years here in the Commonwealth, I'm looking to move the family to Texas in about two years. A bit sad, that, but hey, my ancestors on both sides undertook a far more dangerous move.
Posted by: Kitty Frontage formerly known as Jess1 at April 02, 2013 04:56 AM (lbiWb)
Posted by: RLTW at April 02, 2013 08:52 AM (zA0eu)
--- Thank you Davy, and come on down
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at April 02, 2013 04:57 AM (R8hU8)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at April 02, 2013 04:57 AM (JQuNB)
Unless the primaries are frontloaded with Left states or, worse, states that let Democrats vote in GOP primaries.
If that's the case, the base out in flyoverland gets left with the "choice" of guys whose votes don't matter in the Electoral College and/or actual Democrats. Well, that "choice" or Ron Paul.
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at April 02, 2013 04:58 AM (QTHTd)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 04:58 AM (4nopz)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 02, 2013 04:58 AM (9Bj8R)
We'd have very different candidates if Texas went first.
Plus the conservative vote was split and didn't unify quickly enough. The field was weak, that is true. But that applies to Mitt as well.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 02, 2013 08:56 AM (g2ldK)
I'll keep banging this shit until everybody's so fucking sick of hearing it that they do it just to shut me the fuck up: The primary season needs to be shortened and Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina need to be told to get the fuck back to the end of the line.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 02, 2013 04:59 AM (ahT6Z)
Posted by: luigi vercotti at April 02, 2013 04:59 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: zsasz at April 02, 2013 04:59 AM (MMC8r)
Open primaries should be abolished. If you want to decide the Republican candidate, you out to be registered R. Back to lurking...
Posted by: UDM at April 02, 2013 05:00 AM (9W8cl)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 05:00 AM (4nopz)
Posted by: mugiwara at April 02, 2013 05:00 AM (W7ffl)
#255,
On the plus side, they may damage each other so badly that they're even more irrelevant in the future...
Posted by: Kitty Frontage formerly known as Jess1 at April 02, 2013 05:00 AM (lbiWb)
As a matter of fact, lets put ghey marriage and illegal immigration on the platform. Yeah, that will get us some votes!
Hooray for stupidity!
This is suppose to be the smart party. Yet you have that ignorant shrimp Priebus throwing stuff at the wall and walking with his finger in the wind. He wouldn't know a principle if he stepped in it and it stuck to his shoe.
Posted by: Marcus at April 02, 2013 05:00 AM (xZ56R)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 02, 2013 05:01 AM (9Bj8R)
"Yer beautiful in yer wrath!"
I challenge the Moron Horde to incorporate that sentence into a workplace setting sometime this week. Report back later in the week. Bonus points if delivered a la the Duke.
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at April 02, 2013 05:02 AM (pxDth)
I am addressing my reasoning to what they probably thought were good reason to stay out.
And refuting Gabe's claim that Christians flocked to the polls to vote for Romney. There were plenty that didn't and for some of the reasons I've posited.
And BTW, GABE? Don't fall into the State Media trap and use there labels; there are plenty of Christians that don't call themselves evangelicals. That's one dispute I have about Huckabee.
He's a glib back country tent type circuit preacher who may have been inspired by God but had to keep an eye on the collection plate because that's where his next meal is coming from.
Not to be fully trusted about certain things.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at April 02, 2013 05:02 AM (Kpn/z)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 05:02 AM (ZbSTK)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 02, 2013 05:03 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, FLLDFC Gangstette Wily Wench at April 02, 2013 05:03 AM (kXoT0)
"I truly believe if America had an honest and impartial press the Democrat Party would cease to exist."
Another blogger who I respect said that if we had a neutral media and that if people had any understanding of what liberalism stood for, liberalism would amount to a fringe 5% or so of the electorate, with about as big a share in the political arena as Libertarians have. (No diss of Libertarians intended)
Posted by: RM at April 02, 2013 05:03 AM (/Frlf)
Posted by: katya the designated driver at April 02, 2013 05:05 AM (DoZD+)
Posted by: James at April 02, 2013 05:05 AM (FtL05)
Posted by: thunderb at April 02, 2013 05:06 AM (Ih2Qb)
"Yet you have that ignorant shrimp Priebus throwing stuff at the wall and walking with his finger in the wind. He wouldn't know a principle if he stepped in it and it stuck to his shoe."
Perfect!
"Now, the RNC has tried to stop that and limit the influence of the state parties to do this."
No Gabe, they haven't. The RNC has waffled, muttered, and blabberd a bit, but haven't found their big boy pants. The DNC does it, and frankly the RNC used to do it (exercise political power, that is). Today, the RNC joins Bohner in the corner, wetting themselves...
Posted by: Kitty Frontage formerly known as Jess1 at April 02, 2013 05:06 AM (lbiWb)
Posted by: deadrody at April 02, 2013 05:07 AM (b2D8X)
Bullshit.
People largely got the candidates they wanted.
People who were interested, voted in the primaries.
People ended up with a Party candidate a majority voted for.
We call that a democratic process.
The choices were, what they were. People knew what the alternative was. They knew every vote in the General would make a difference.
Yet some stayed home and pouted.
Others are still talking about how weak the field was.
Suck it up and drive on. Maybe next time, get off your ass and get involved or vote.
I am a little sick of the mamby pamby baby complaints and excuses.
Posted by: Marcus at April 02, 2013 05:07 AM (xZ56R)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 05:07 AM (4nopz)
Posted by: James at April 02, 2013 09:05 AM (FtL05)
Considering the 2010 blowout, I'd say you guys have a cult of personality problem. Good luck winning elections without chocolate Jesus on the top of the ticket.
Posted by: mugiwara at April 02, 2013 05:07 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, FLLDFC Gangstette Wily Wench at April 02, 2013 05:08 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: RWC at April 02, 2013 05:09 AM (fWAjv)
Yes, James, "The message is out there" - that the GOP is a whimpering, simpering mess of would be fools. No wonder said message is rejected. Now if you wish to discuss the acceptance of content, then that's another story...
Posted by: Kitty Frontage formerly known as Jess1 at April 02, 2013 05:09 AM (lbiWb)
Posted by: Marcus at April 02, 2013 05:09 AM (xZ56R)
Posted by: deadrody at April 02, 2013 05:09 AM (b2D8X)
Posted by: SurferDoc at April 02, 2013 05:10 AM (6H6FZ)
Let's look at the actual state by state primary returns.
Up until April 2012, the only states in which Romney won a majority were Massachusetts (a state no GOP candidate would have a prayer of carrying in the general) and Virginia (where it was only Romney and Paul on the ballot). The other states he won:
New Hampshire, 39%
Florida, 47%
Arizona, 47%
Michigan, 41%
Ohio, 38% (with Santorum at 37%...)
Vermont, 40%
Illinois, 47%
So Romney was winning pluralities but not majorities. However, thanks to GOP delegate rules, he was winning the lions share of delegates to that point. Come April, the writing was on the wall. Plus, by that time there were very big states (New York, California, Texas) who voted in majorities for Romney...but mainly because at that time Romney was mainly running against Ron Paul.
So looking at a 52% primary vote total is misleading. It is as someone else said...the opposition was fractured between two different candidates and neither could really get that faction unified.
Posted by: @JohnTant at April 02, 2013 05:10 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: Lincolntf at April 02, 2013 09:03 AM (ZshNr)
The longer the campaign season the more money it takes to run one. Romney had an extremely well financed organization that gave him a clear advantage over everybody. Also Romney, for all his flaws, was and is an excellent executive so he had more experience at running things other than his mouth which gave him an advantage over Noot for example. I'm not saying that Gingrich would have made a very good President; just using him as an example of how the long campaigns keep potentially good candidates out and increase the influence of people like Rove who are good at separating the swells from their money and backing candidates with it.
I also think that the GOP has a much better bench of candidates for 2016 than 2012, which was a perfect storm of shit where nobody good came to mind.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 02, 2013 05:10 AM (ahT6Z)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 05:10 AM (ZbSTK)
Posted by: James at April 02, 2013 05:11 AM (FtL05)
Suck it up and drive on. Maybe next time, get off your ass and get involved or vote.
I dunno. It would be nice to get a chance to vote in a primary when there are people I actually want to vote for still in the race. In 2008 I had a choice between Romney and McCain, in 2012 Romney had pretty much won by the time I got to vote.
Posted by: Grey Fox at April 02, 2013 05:11 AM (BsxM8)
"And when the country really starts going to the pooper, well, you may all go to hell, and I will go to Texas."
As are we. (DRUMROOOLLLL)
After nearly four hundred years here in the Commonwealth, I'm looking to move the family to Texas in about two years. A bit sad, that, but hey, my ancestors on both sides undertook a far more dangerous move.
Posted by: Kitty Frontage formerly known as Jess1 at April 02, 2013 08:56 AM (lbiWb)
If they let you leave. If TS really did HTF, I could imagine Massachusetts setting the staties at the border to either send you back at gunpoint or confiscate everything up to and including your car as "compensation" for the loss of your tax revenue.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 02, 2013 05:12 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 02, 2013 05:13 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 02, 2013 05:14 AM (GFM2b)
"Oh, and women, and gays, and people with sympathy for women and gays, what with the manufactured Romney war against abortion and gay rights."
When you don't strike first, you're reduced to reacting to your opponent - which was (seemingly) the major thrust of his campaign.
"During the primaries, he went after his opponents like they were the Anti-Christ, "
THANK YOU for pointing out what I thought was obvious - the reason Mitt took the primaries was that he "went in swinging". Did many here suddenly forget his primary performances? Geesh.
Certainly went soft later, though. Bleh.
Posted by: Kitty Frontage formerly known as Jess1 at April 02, 2013 05:14 AM (lbiWb)
Did Romney throw the election?
His own son says he didn't act like he wanted to win.
He threw away chances and was surprised when he did do something that worked.
He hired incompetents and didn't supervise them.
His GOTV effort could've been the final straw.
His well touted management skill was not so evident except in the primaries as he zealously knocked down all the other contenders.
Where did some the dirt thrown come from? or Who?
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at April 02, 2013 05:14 AM (Kpn/z)
Posted by: deadrody at April 02, 2013 05:14 AM (b2D8X)
"This is internet tough-guy talk"
I've been an RNC Delegate here in VA.
#289 - it's the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Posted by: Kitty Frontage formerly known as Jess1 at April 02, 2013 05:15 AM (lbiWb)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 02, 2013 05:15 AM (u6Ixe)
Posted by: Mr. Pink aka a man without a political party at April 02, 2013 07:46 AM (++kZl)
Crazy Cindy Sheehan. What ever happened to that pile of nuts? She claimed to have boned Chavez before he went to the eternal sulphur pits. Funny he always claimed to keep smelling sulphur at the UN.
Posted by: Buckeye Abroad at April 02, 2013 05:16 AM (f+TdG)
Posted by: thunderb at April 02, 2013 05:16 AM (Ih2Qb)
And you, wearing your rose colored glasses, acting like a Pollyana are all ready to claim that all that has to be done is just compromise just a little more on just a few measly issues and we can win again is any better than internet tough guy talk?
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at April 02, 2013 05:16 AM (Kpn/z)
You have a responsibility to vote. But that includes being informed.
You don't vote for a commercial or some shit you heard from your neighbor.
You don't jump off the cliff with other lemmings then say you "didn't know" there was a cliff there.
Take a half hour away from the boob tube or stop surfing the net and read on the issues.
Voting takes some effort. If you can't spend the time it takes to get yourself informed, don't bother.
I've met a lot of seniors in NY who told me they always voted Democrat. That's why they voted for Obama. They though all the "facts" about healthcare were the same old politics.
Now they are devastated by what's going on with their healthcare. Their budgets are getting blown out of the water and they are struggling to live.
Now they are asking what can be done? Well, nothing. You chose badly and stupidly. Maybe next time- vote for the other guy.
Posted by: Marcus at April 02, 2013 05:17 AM (xZ56R)
Posted by: James at April 02, 2013 05:17 AM (FtL05)
Posted by: deadrody at April 02, 2013 05:20 AM (b2D8X)
Posted by: James at April 02, 2013 05:20 AM (FtL05)
Posted by: Andrew at April 02, 2013 05:20 AM (HS3dy)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 09:10 AM (ZbSTK)
Gabe my history's a bit rusty on this, but IIRC, they always fold on the "docking the delegates" thing.
They start out with "you won't be seated" and then they wait a while and when its clear it doesn't matter much (due to other primaries) they say "we'll go ahead and seat you now."
So they aren't exactly sticking to principles.
What we do have is solid evidence that Iowa skews the primary system. Candidates have repeatedly made out of Iowa and never make it to even the middle of the primary season. This elongates the primary season.
Iowa (thanks to a lot of things, including corn subsidies) is not representative of the US.
And that doesn't even begin to take into account things like the Chaos that happened in MO where our Governor veto the bill that would have moved our primary forcing the state party to choose between either a) ignoring the outcome or b) being docked delegates for something that wasn't even our fault. (State law dictates when the primaries are held, here, unless they're moved by more state law.)
So what we've got is at best an inconsistent system that needs to be overhauled and the RNC shows no real impetus to do that, so we keep going with the same (quite obviously) broken system.
IMHO at the very least we should be moving towards a more regional system, with batches of primaries (not caucuses, primaries.) The RNC should have the power to make that happen but it will require muscle (and pissing people off).
Posted by: tsrblke at April 02, 2013 05:20 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Ed Anger at April 02, 2013 05:21 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: zsasz at April 02, 2013 05:21 AM (MMC8r)
So I've got that going for me, which is nice.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 02, 2013 09:15 AM (u6Ixe)
The Free Shit People will be begging or stealing in $200 sneakers to eat while the Hard Work people defend their stuff with $900 handguns and $1300 rifles.
Posted by: SurferDoc at April 02, 2013 05:21 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: blindside at April 02, 2013 05:22 AM (x7g7t)
2004 election - 62M vs 59M R US pop 294M
2008 election - 69.5M vs 60M D US pop 304M
2012 election - 66M vs 61M D US pop 313M
If D turnout was as high in 2004 as it was in 2008 and 2012 Bush would have lost.
Posted by: Vic at April 02, 2013 05:23 AM (53z96)
The choices are what they are at that point. No matter how that point is adjusted in the future, one makes the best choice they can.
You vote for the candidate who has the best chance to beat the opposition. That's a goal most folks lose in all the primary balkinization.
If you don't vote in the general- you've chosen. The choice you've made is the opposition is better than your parties alternative.
Posted by: Marcus at April 02, 2013 05:23 AM (xZ56R)
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at April 02, 2013 05:24 AM (YYJjz)
Okay, I compiled the results of the first 100 comments on this thread- Here are the reasons Romney lost:
Evangelicals
OH, VA, FL
bad messaging
Huckabee
God
GOP establishment
Social conservatives
Coverup by the MSM
Liberal media controlling the message
The women vote
Lack of appeal to young, women and Hispanics
People who want to be lied to
Moderate VP candidates
Conservative media alienating single women
Democrat setting up straw men
Squishy RINO presidential candidates
Democrat voters internalized lies
Democrat nominees "daddy issues" appeal to women
Voter fraud in key precincts
Racial guilt/shaming voters
Media in collaboration with LIV's
Black and Hispanic vote
Failure to use social media
Pandering to Lady Gaga fans
Abortion moms
Not embracing extremists within the party
Karl Rove
Lack of a more conservative candidate
Just sayin'
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at April 02, 2013 05:25 AM (pxDth)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 02, 2013 05:26 AM (u6Ixe)
Posted by: James at April 02, 2013 05:26 AM (FtL05)
Posted by: Grey Fox at April 02, 2013 05:27 AM (BsxM8)
Posted by: deadrody at April 02, 2013 05:27 AM (b2D8X)
Black people didn't make up the majority of the Occutards either. That's what we mean by the "Free Shit Army".
Posted by: EC at April 02, 2013 05:28 AM (GQ8sn)
WHAT actual data?
Gathered by WHOM?
Reported and promulgated by, again, WHOM?
They're guessing just as much as anyone else is.
Because exit polls and after election polls and any other tabulations of what voters with what party affiliation voted and what the supposed composition of the voting precinct is claimed to be are all based on at least one lie.
That lie is that people will always tell the truth to a an anonymous pollster. The other lie is that the pollster won't/didn't influence the pollee.
How many answers that are tabulated and spread about as gospel are actual bullshit handed out by a voter who doesn't want to be bothered and doesn't want to give some unknown party answers to questions that are none of their business.
But too many people are too polite or just like to fuck with pollsters and so they LIE and say whatever they think the pollster or the organization they claim they work for wants to hear.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at April 02, 2013 05:28 AM (Kpn/z)
Now they are devastated by what's going on with their healthcare. Their budgets are getting blown out of the water and they are struggling to live.
Now they are asking what can be done? Well, nothing. You chose badly and stupidly. Maybe next time- vote for the other guy.
Posted by: Marcus at April 02, 2013 09:17 AM (xZ56R)
Democrats could be selling them into Solyent Green and they'd still vote Democrat
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 02, 2013 05:28 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: James at April 02, 2013 05:28 AM (FtL05)
Posted by: mugiwara at April 02, 2013 05:28 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: zsasz at April 02, 2013 05:28 AM (MMC8r)
And it's a pretty thin veil you wear...by "free shit army" everyone knows you mean "black people". But black people don't make up a majority of the electorate, so...just do some fucking math.
Racist. Why do you immediately think of black people as lazy?
Posted by: Grey Fox at April 02, 2013 05:29 AM (BsxM8)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 02, 2013 05:30 AM (9Bj8R)
Everybody give James a hand.....for that wonderfully brazen show of his deck of race cards.
Posted by: crowsting at April 02, 2013 05:30 AM (61BD9)
Posted by: deadrody at April 02, 2013 05:30 AM (b2D8X)
Posted by: zsasz at April 02, 2013 05:30 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: James at April 02, 2013 05:31 AM (FtL05)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 02, 2013 05:31 AM (u6Ixe)
Posted by: zsasz at April 02, 2013 05:32 AM (MMC8r)
Oh Jimmy, you're so superior to us. Please enlighten us
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 02, 2013 05:32 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: deadrody at April 02, 2013 05:32 AM (b2D8X)
Hey kids, it's the thread killer here, with a coupla points before everyone leaves for the new post. First, in my own personal experience not backed by science, the people most likely to be at fault for any fuckup are the ones spinning like a centrifuge to sling blame and mud elsewhere. So look who is doing the most finger pointing and cock punch them first.
Secondly, the media problem, which will not be gone in 14 or 16 or as far out as I can imagine we still have a viable economy. We (defined as not moonbat liberal) will not get fair coverage of issues or candidates as long as the media status quo remains. That's just a fact. And while what Akin and that goof from Indiana said were actuall egregious, what will be mocked and ridiculed will change for election to election, but the strategy will remain the same... take your opponents stupidest statements, and make them the de facto policies of the entire party, and make the entire party either stand or fall on those stupied statements. Granted, this only works in one direction, as the major media is so overwhelmingly liberal, but the point is not to only point fingers at the likes of Akin et al, but to find a way around the strategy of painting all conservatives with the words that show us in the worst possible light. Maquaqua, anyone?
Posted by: OneEyedJack at April 02, 2013 05:32 AM (ORvjs)
Show your methodology and the way you weighted the key words in the comments and what key words did you disregard.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at April 02, 2013 05:33 AM (Kpn/z)
Posted by: SurferDoc at April 02, 2013 05:33 AM (6H6FZ)
So James likes to kill the unborn....aren't we a big man, picking on the weakest and less-able to defend themselves crowd.
Where in the Constitution, does it say we have the right to slaughter the innocent, Jimbo?
Posted by: crowsting at April 02, 2013 05:33 AM (61BD9)
See, people are free to vote for whatever they want to.
Funny, I thought we had a Bill of Rights designed to prevent people from voting "for whatever they wanted to"...
This is a place called "America"
For the nonce. In a few years, though, who knows?
Posted by: Grey Fox at April 02, 2013 05:33 AM (BsxM8)
Posted by: mugiwara at April 02, 2013 05:34 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: zsasz at April 02, 2013 05:34 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 05:34 AM (ZbSTK)
Posted by: James at April 02, 2013 09:26 AM (FtL05)
Fuck. We've got a real genius codebreaker here.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 02, 2013 05:35 AM (ahT6Z)
Posted by: citizen of the LoL at April 02, 2013 05:35 AM (DBkD3)
I like the Black democrat that was going to be a Republican in NYC to run for mayor.
You can not make this shit up. Why he was arrested is strange to me. Protecting the lesbo that is running?
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at April 02, 2013 05:37 AM (Cydud)
And it's a pretty thin veil you wear...by "free shit army" everyone knows you mean "black people". But black people don't make up a majority of the electorate, so...just do some fucking math.
Nice little straw man you got there.
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at April 02, 2013 05:37 AM (eyJh9)
@ 316 - "You guys can keep saying "free shit army" etc all you want if it makes you feel better, but most people just voted for Obama because Mitt Romney didn't strike them as a better President. It's really as simple as that, but by all means, continue alienating virtually everyone. "
Yeah - they thought Obama was better because they're the FSA and he's the one handing out FS. Simple really.
"And it's a pretty thin veil you wear...by "free shit army" everyone knows you mean "black people". But black people don't make up a majority of the electorate, so...just do some fucking math."
You are so stupid, you don't even realise when you've made a self-stultifying statement. Since everybody already knows that blacks are a minority and can't elect a President on their own, it's obvious that when people refer to the FSA, they don't mean "blacks." They really mean "people who want FS."
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at April 02, 2013 05:38 AM (YYJjz)
You don't have anymore provable "data" than I do chum.
If you do then post it or link it.
*waiting*
*waiting*
*waiting*
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at April 02, 2013 05:38 AM (Kpn/z)
Now they are devastated by what's going on with their healthcare. Their budgets are getting blown out of the water and they are struggling to live.
Now they are asking what can be done? Well, nothing. You chose badly and stupidly. Maybe next time- vote for the other guy.
Won't happen. If they couldn't be bothered to find out the truth about Obastardcare, they're not going to make the effort to find out why it's killing them. They'll simply believe that Obama meant well. Or that it's those evil Rethuglicans' fault.
Which is why I believe - even though a lot here don't - in "I told you so." Always voted Democrat, never believed the GOP warnings? Fuck you, choke on it and die. Maybe you'll learn a lesson, but as far as I'm concerned now, it's time to take a nice, big bite of that shit sandwich you begged for, asshole.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 02, 2013 05:40 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: James at April 02, 2013 05:40 AM (FtL05)
Posted by: dfbaskwill at April 02, 2013 05:41 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: James at April 02, 2013 09:31 AM (FtL05)
You didn't vote against womyn in binders? Sexist pig! Little Jimmy living in his parent's basement how can't figure out why his degree in advanced leftist studies can't get a job but he's going to fight against the Man no matter what.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 02, 2013 05:41 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars at April 02, 2013 05:41 AM (NokrH)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 02, 2013 05:41 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Ed Anger at April 02, 2013 09:21 AM (tOkJB)
Interesting, Ed - I'll have to check that out. Thanks!
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at April 02, 2013 05:41 AM (zF6Iw)
I always know when I hit a nerve around here...multiple people yell back that they're not racist. HahahahahaFUCK YOU
Posted by: James at April 02, 2013 09:40 AM (FtL05)
Run along now. That gloryhole isn't going to man itself
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 02, 2013 05:41 AM (1Jaio)
#351,
Do tell...
352, "Well folks, unlike most of you, I have a job I have to go to"
At this time in the AM? Some of us were up and working several hours ago, slacker.
Posted by: Kitty Frontage formerly known as Jess1 at April 02, 2013 05:42 AM (lbiWb)
Posted by: zsasz at April 02, 2013 05:42 AM (MMC8r)
@ 330 - "See, people are free to vote for whatever they want to."
Actually, not. There's a thing called "the Constitution" that restrains even "the people."
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at April 02, 2013 05:42 AM (YYJjz)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 02, 2013 05:42 AM (u6Ixe)
We are not ready for a Mormon to be president.
Sorry, just the facts.
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at April 02, 2013 05:43 AM (Cydud)
Posted by: zsasz at April 02, 2013 05:43 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: dr. shatterhand at April 02, 2013 05:43 AM (n/ogz)
Whenever I hear someone start in on the "messaging is the problem" the answer eventually winds up being to actually change the position.
Seen it too many times. Good for you if that's as far as you actually want to go. I'll wait to see more.
But even then, changing the messaging won't do diddly squat if the medium has been hijacked. So what's the point of acting like as if it can? (that's where the rose glasses and Pollyanna come in).
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That at April 02, 2013 05:44 AM (Kpn/z)
Posted by: James at April 02, 2013 09:40 AM (FtL05)
Keep telling yourself that you're the smart one; assuming the other voices in your empty head don't drown it out.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 02, 2013 05:44 AM (ahT6Z)
Posted by: zsasz at April 02, 2013 09:43 AM (MMC8r)
LOL!
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at April 02, 2013 05:45 AM (Cydud)
Posted by: blindside at April 02, 2013 05:45 AM (x7g7t)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 05:45 AM (ZbSTK)
Posted by: zsasz at April 02, 2013 05:45 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at April 02, 2013 05:46 AM (Cydud)
Posted by: mugiwara at April 02, 2013 05:47 AM (W7ffl)
"Interesting, Ed - I'll have to check that out. Thanks!"
FWIW, I'm fairly certain that the claim of "OMG Cancer from fallout" came from that well known medical journal known as "People Magazine" circa 1980 or so. Took about five minutes for someone to point out their numbers were bogus...
Posted by: Kitty Frontage formerly known as Jess1 at April 02, 2013 05:47 AM (lbiWb)
Posted by: zsasz at April 02, 2013 05:47 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: TheQuietMan at April 02, 2013 05:47 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 02, 2013 05:48 AM (u6Ixe)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 05:50 AM (ZbSTK)
"Believing in the myth of low evangelical turnout is a failure to identify the problem. "
Seems the only ones even caring about "low evangelical turnout" are Huckabee and you. Most here seem to be concerned as to how we can attract a candidate/slate of candidates willing and eager to engage in the political conflicts.
Posted by: Kitty Frontage formerly known as Jess1 at April 02, 2013 05:51 AM (lbiWb)
You don't read the NY Slime? I would think the Post would have it too. Read this shit, wild!
http://tinyurl.com/buogfnw
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at April 02, 2013 05:52 AM (Cydud)
Posted by: Billy Bob, pseudo intellectual at April 02, 2013 05:54 AM (Cydud)
I especially like how little Jimmy thinks his deft equating of FSA to black people led to everyone here proclaiming they're not racist. Brush up on that reading comprehension Jimbo, nobody here was claiming they aren't racist, everyone is just pointing out that you clearly are.
Posted by: mugiwara at April 02, 2013 05:56 AM (W7ffl)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 02, 2013 09:48 AM (u6Ixe)
When erg Ebert turned his crusty jizz laden hands to movie reviewing, it was a sad day for trolldom. I don't think the fucking retards have recovered from that meteor money shot.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 02, 2013 05:57 AM (ahT6Z)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 05:58 AM (ZbSTK)
--------------
It was the final straw for me. Fucking back bay fucking retards they are.
Posted by: Attila at April 02, 2013 05:58 AM (Cs2tJ)
Being a Christian and very active in my church. I don't know of anyone who stayed home because Romney is a Mormon. Nobody I spoke with was exactly thrilled with him but for reasons other than his faith. Mainly that he was a RINO squish. But the morons running the RNC need a scapegoat. They are also dumb enough to believe it's a "messaging issue". It's not. It's actually picking candidates that actually adhere to the platform but actually govern like a conservative instead of sounding like one only when convenient.
Posted by: Minnfidel at April 02, 2013 06:01 AM (wLY+G)
Posted by: Minnfidel at April 02, 2013 06:05 AM (wLY+G)
The only people deathly afraid of being thought of as racists are libtards.
Fucking AMATEUR, Cap'n.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at April 02, 2013 09:48 AM (u6Ixe)
I like your "tone."
Posted by: Ammo Dump at April 02, 2013 06:08 AM (YYyqq)
"Evangelicals had a larger share of the vote in 2012 than ever before."
So the brain [drain] trust running the GOP into the ground comes to the inevitable conclusion that we need to kick social conservatives to the curb. Which will lead them with an army of officers, most of them stupid.
I mean, to an extent the socon problem is obviously self-inflicted: when you keep showing up like a kicked dog regardless, you are signalling you can be taken for granted. Sit on your hands for a cycle, and the big brains will change their tune.
Posted by: Steve the Pirate at April 02, 2013 06:16 AM (qevSe)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 06:21 AM (ZbSTK)
Posted by: eman at April 02, 2013 06:31 AM (bP2re)
Posted by: Andrew at April 02, 2013 06:39 AM (HS3dy)
Posted by: panzernashorn at April 02, 2013 06:40 AM (MhA4j)
"Maybe conservatives and conservative media should stop going on and on over and over about how single women are worthless pieces of shit ruining the country."
Okay, baby daddys and basement dwelling mommy's boys are pieces of shit too.
Posted by: Wendy at April 02, 2013 06:41 AM (KydDZ)
Posted by: Andrew at April 02, 2013 06:45 AM (HS3dy)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 06:50 AM (ZbSTK)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 06:55 AM (ZbSTK)
Posted by: Andrew at April 02, 2013 06:56 AM (HS3dy)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 06:58 AM (ZbSTK)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 07:01 AM (ZbSTK)
<i>Who's kicking socons to the curb? The party is as pro-life as ever. Almost all GOP politicians are as pro-traditional marriage as ever, including the RNC chairman. That Priebus said that he didn't believe Sen. Portman should be drummed out of the party is taken to mean he wants to "kick social conservatives to the curb" is pathetic hysteria.
Tiresome victimology is tiresome.</i>
No, tiresome establishment apologetics is tiresome. The "post-mortem" skips merrily away from any discussion of pro-life issues, and you know it. Despite running a candidate who ran a simon-pure economics issues campaign, got his Veep selection to modify his own pro-life beliefs to trim to his, and even ran pro-Roe ads in PA, the post-mortem seems to think "even less so" is the trick. Oh, I'm sorry--it's "changing our tone" on abortion. Yeah, "pro-life as ever."
We don't have these soul-searching sessions after someone like Carly Fiorina gets creamed. And the notion that an eminence grise like Rob Portman is going to get run from the party is nigh unto hilarious.
Posted by: Steve the Pirate at April 02, 2013 07:05 AM (qevSe)
Posted by: darelf at April 02, 2013 07:18 AM (Z1WKS)
Posted by: Shoot Me at April 02, 2013 07:22 AM (qiXMt)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 07:31 AM (ZbSTK)
Posted by: citizen of the LoL at April 02, 2013 07:40 AM (DBkD3)
This is just another continuation of Huckabee's ongoing quest to become the face and voice of evangelical conservativism. His defense of Akin during the 2012 campaign was indefensible from a national campaign strategic standpoint, but made perfect sense from Huckabee's perspective. By defending the idiotic Akin and encouraging him to resist GOP party pressure to get him to drop out, Huckabee essentially prevented giving another, non-idiotic Republican candidate a shot at defeating McCaskill. In short, Huckabee's building a power base and has demonstrably proven that nothing is more important to Mike Huckabee than Mike Huckabee. He's an asshole.
Posted by: troyriser at April 02, 2013 07:46 AM (vtiE6)
Posted by: panzernashorn at April 02, 2013 08:03 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: citizen of the LoL at April 02, 2013 08:05 AM (DBkD3)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 02, 2013 08:06 AM (4nopz)
Posted by: panzernashorn at April 02, 2013 08:06 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: panzernashorn at April 02, 2013 08:07 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Chairman LMAO at April 02, 2013 08:09 AM (9eDbm)
Posted by: citizen of the LoL at April 02, 2013 11:40 AM (DBkD3)
Romney was the best candidate among the choices presented. I had high hopes for Rick Perry, Romney's most formidable opponent of the lot of them, but Perry never should've attempted a grueling national campaign while recovering from (evidently fairly serious) back surgery. Running under such conditions was a bad call on Perry's part, and speaks to lack of good judgement--which (again) may've been compromised by his medical condition. So Romney won the nomination.
If what Romney's son said is true, that his father didn't really want the job, then that's the reason for Romney's less-than-stellar performance (in a lifetime of stellar performances). Lincoln called presidential ambitions 'the worm in the belly' that gnawed and nibbled away at him and gave him no rest, implying that he (Lincoln) wanted the job badly, more than anything. If you don't want it, you don't get it.
Posted by: troyriser at April 02, 2013 08:09 AM (vtiE6)
"However, they are the Republicans who would make abortion illegal, rather than simply outlawing any public tax funding of abortion, prohibiting tax funds from any clinic or organization that provides abortion, no matter where or when. They are also the Republicans who would assign the Puritanical scarlet letter to those who don't measure up to perfection. And finally, refusing a clause to permit legal abortion in cases of legally reported rape (whether a case is solved or not) or when a mother's life is threatened is hardcore fundamentalism. That line of thought would limit sexual intercourse strictly for the purpose of conception."
Lovely cartoonish depiction of the hateful socon.
Posted by: Steve the Pirate at April 02, 2013 09:33 AM (qevSe)
Die in a fire, all you vile right-wing trolls and sock puppets.
It is a beautiful time here in Vermont, as we are the vanguard of our beloved President's drive to ensure all people have health care. Lay down your vile racist hate for Him. Join us as we move FORWARD!
Posted by: Mary Cloggenstein from Brattleboro, Vermont at April 02, 2013 09:42 AM (jCQ+I)
Posted by: darelf at April 02, 2013 11:37 AM (Z1WKS)
Posted by: citizen of the LoL at April 02, 2013 12:57 PM (DBkD3)
Do I think around 4 or 5 million conservative voters who voted for Bush in 2004 stayed home and didn't vote in 2012? I think that is highly likely. In fact, I think it is extremely likely.
You're assuming that there are 4 or 5 million new conservative voters out there, something that doesn't appear in the voter registration numbers. Also, your claim that these voters could have voted for Bush in 2004, but didn't vote in 2012 is unsupported. You want to believe these voters are out there, but they don't show up in the voter totals, the voter registration numbers, or public polling.
Again, the data does not support the claims that are being made.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at April 02, 2013 01:36 PM (jZUEZ)
Posted by: Darel Finkbeiner at April 02, 2013 02:23 PM (beDy6)
commiecrats=republicoms Anyone that professes shock when the republicoms sell us out on gun confiscation (and they will) is a fool.
Posted by: Torqued at April 02, 2013 04:08 PM (AKS75)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2489 seconds, 548 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 02, 2013 02:56 AM (tqLft)