May 29, 2013
— Gabriel Malor Happy Wednesday.
Forgive me if this has been linked before, I've been out of town. David Freddoso has an interesting column on Speaker Boehner's leadership style, as contrasted with the DeLay-Pelosi strong-arm speakerships.
Rep. Bachmann has an eight-minute video announcing that she won't run for reelection next year. It's somethin'.
WSJ is still asking about the IRS targeting of groups that support Israel, something that has seemed to get lost in the scandal.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:49 AM
| Comments (384)
Post contains 81 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: kreplach at May 29, 2013 02:54 AM (ytax8)
Morning, ‘rons and ‘ronettes. It’s a rainy morning here in MA; I hope it’s sunny and warm where you are. While we wait for Vic, why not grab a cup of joe and settle back for a moment. . .
Before John Wayne, the biggest Western star was the grim-faced man of few words William S. Hart, a silent actor whose pictures – The Man From Nowhere, The Silent Man, The Testing Block and many others – are credited with establishing the character of the “good bad man,” the Western antihero who is redeemed by a noble cause or a good woman. Hart was a stickler for realism (or as much as could be had within the confines of a movie), and here’s a story about one time things got a little too real:
During the shooting one of his movies, Hart had arranged for a scene with a knockdown brawl in a restaurant. It would culminate with Hart knocking out an extra and a professional boxer had been hired for the scene.
Before the cameras rolled, Hart took the extra aside. “Partner,” he told the big bruiser, “of course, you know your business, but since we’ve never fought before, I want to explain how we try and work it.” He then went on to tell the extra to pull his punches as much as he could – and Hart would do the same – but make it look like a real fight as much as possible.
“One last thing, brother,” Hart finished. “When I judge we’ve got enough for the scene, I’ll swing and land on you. I’ll pull the punch as much as I can, and as I do, I’ll yell ‘Go,’ and you go down just like you would in a real fight.”
Through all of this, the extra hadn’t asked for an explanation or for cues; in fact, he hadn’t said anything at all. Figuring he was just taciturn, Hart patted him on the shoulder. “Remember, I’ll holler ‘Go,” and you hit the floor.”
“Roll camera!” the director shouted, and the fight began. Hart quickly found the extra was taking the fight much more seriously than he wanted him to, but as the two traded crushing blows, the actor comforted himself with the thought that at least it would be a realistic scene. Finally, he decided they had enough footage in the can; he lunged at the extra and yelled “Go!”
To his astonishment, the man kept on fighting, charging Hart like a wounded bear. “Go!” Hart yelled again. “GO!” But it didn’t work – Hart took a massive right to the jaw and was nearly knocked cold. Infuriated, he leaped on the extra, delivering a storm of punches, kicks and gouges that finally brought the man down.
Hart was still pounding the man’s face as the crew pulled the two apart. Straining against the men holding him, Hart began yelling at the extra for ignoring his instructions. “Wait a minute, Mr. Hart,” said the man who had hired the extra, pushing his way through the crowd. “You’re all wrong.”
Then he explained. “We forgot to tell you this man is stone deaf. It’s not his fault.”
An abashed Hart took the extra to the hospital and paid the bill. But he never saw the man again.
Hope you all have a wonderful day.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 29, 2013 02:56 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 29, 2013 02:57 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at May 29, 2013 02:58 AM (JdUNu)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 29, 2013 03:00 AM (+98Gb)
..and no real fight."
WTF?
Posted by: lowandslow at May 29, 2013 03:01 AM (Fz2C7)
And it's so good and good for you!
Be sure to have a side of chain immigration! I hear it's wonderful.
Posted by: Weimar Republican at May 29, 2013 03:01 AM (Cnqmv)
http://t.co/5WPOcepBeX
Do you think these people ever go outside except to make asses of themselves?
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ drinking beer at May 29, 2013 03:01 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: kreplach at May 29, 2013 03:04 AM (BNuW6)
Posted by: Baldy at May 29, 2013 03:05 AM (tyDFN)
Posted by: DangerGirl @deadlyestrogen at May 29, 2013 03:05 AM (4Vr+0)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 29, 2013 03:06 AM (khd7K)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 03:08 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: kreplach at May 29, 2013 03:10 AM (74T7W)
Posted by: Bwoston Stwong at May 29, 2013 03:11 AM (+kznc)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 29, 2013 03:11 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 29, 2013 03:12 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: blaster at May 29, 2013 03:13 AM (5t86S)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 03:13 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 29, 2013 03:13 AM (+98Gb)
Will our essence be preserved?
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/u][/s][/b] at May 29, 2013 03:14 AM (sbV1u)
Romney and the GOP leadership knew what was happening with the IRS, they chose to do nothing.
Which, if true, should be the occasion for the final falling of the scales from "moderate" eyes. It stains the GOP as just as much a bunch of statist quo hacks and enemies of freedom as the Democrats. Without a massive realignment, we're entering the area where "burn it down and hang them all" will be the only option.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 29, 2013 03:14 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Elizabethe at May 29, 2013 03:14 AM (qPCAa)
Posted by: tony redenzo at May 29, 2013 03:16 AM (DUfN3)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 29, 2013 03:16 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: zeera at May 29, 2013 03:17 AM (3dXwx)
But Ghoulsbee's intentions were noble because everyone knew how evil the Koch Brothers are by their daily actions of employing people, producing product, and not being part of the crony socialist state. It was just necessary to be sure they paid their fair share of taxes (unlike Warren Buffet).
Posted by: Weimar Republican at May 29, 2013 03:17 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at May 29, 2013 03:17 AM (U2UQk)
Yep. Right up there with associated other X-game type events. Used to recruit at those tournaments.
Posted by: Sean Bannion[/i][/u][/s][/b] at May 29, 2013 03:17 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 29, 2013 03:18 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 03:18 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 03:19 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Bwoston Stwong at May 29, 2013 03:19 AM (+kznc)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 29, 2013 07:00 AM (+98Gb)
========
Her heart was in the right place, too bad she couldn't keep her mouth with it. Amazing how a single word (and a made-up word at that) can define, and demolish, a political career.
Oh, and Good Morning!
Posted by: Nighthawk at May 29, 2013 03:19 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Regular Moron [/i] at May 29, 2013 03:19 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s][/u] at May 29, 2013 03:19 AM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 29, 2013 03:19 AM (GoIUi)
Lawyers leading the fight for gay marriage in California have been quietly preparing state officials for the possibility the U.S. Supreme Court might dismiss the case on a technicality next month without deciding the fate of Proposition 8.
The justices could decide that the sponsors of the ballot measure outlawing same-sex marriage had no legal right, or standing, to defend it in federal court. That would end the case in Washington, but it is not clear what it would mean for California.
http://tinyurl.com/q5gaepw
That would leave the breadth of the effects of the initial case to be fought over within California, but would kill any nationwide legalization from this case.
Wonder if all the "growth" you've been seeing over the last few months among politicians, Portman and so on, is because the powers that be got a heads up on the ruling and are laying the groundwork for a new round of state and federal attempts to legislate gay marriage into existence.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 29, 2013 03:21 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 29, 2013 03:21 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 29, 2013 03:22 AM (+98Gb)
But sick animals I do not leave alone. I seriously could not believe this one woman in Dollar General yesterday. She was taking out of her cart various tins of wet good and a bag of dry. Commented she is support staff to a cat also. Her cat had eight kittens five weeks ago.. One died and the other she says got lost, she went away for a couple days and left cat and kittens inside the house. A lost kitten, possibly dead, in the house.
Eerrr....
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 29, 2013 03:24 AM (khd7K)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 03:25 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 29, 2013 03:26 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 03:26 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 03:26 AM (9Bj8R)
Dan Richard, chairman of the California High-speed Rail Authority, said at a congressional hearing in Madera that the agency had reduced the risk of future cost overruns, but the project's price tag could increase in the future.
"I am not going to sit here and promise that there will not be [cost growth]," Richard said.
http://tinyurl.com/on56u44
Hey, that's great. Wait a minute.....
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 29, 2013 03:27 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 29, 2013 03:27 AM (XYSwB)
Identify your source (jail time), or be proven a liar and Romney can sue your cadaverous ass into penury.
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 29, 2013 03:28 AM (cHZB7)
Posted by: Hillary Don't Spare the Rodham Clinton at May 29, 2013 03:30 AM (Ynbgq)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 29, 2013 07:22 AM (+98Gb) "
======
But of course!
You can get away with anything when the Ministry of Truth has your back.
Exhibit A: (still) Attorney General Eric Holder.
Posted by: Nighthawk at May 29, 2013 03:30 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 29, 2013 03:30 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 03:30 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: zeera at May 29, 2013 03:31 AM (3dXwx)
Posted by: panzernashorn at May 29, 2013 03:35 AM (MhA4j)
I wonder when someone will question Dingy Reid about his statements about Romney's tax info, under oath of course. Where did you get that 'info', Dingy?
Silly winger. Probing questions are only for enemies of the state.
Identify your source (jail time), or be proven a liar and Romney can sue your cadaverous ass into penury.
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 29, 2013 07:28 AM (cHZB7)
Romney was a one-punch wonder who rolled into the fetal position and begged the mean MFM to leave him alone. Fuck him.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 29, 2013 03:35 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 03:36 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: mindful webworker wakka walks at May 29, 2013 03:37 AM (Vs6FA)
The hell with that closeted queen Barry; what the voters want is a full-out open pervert for President.
If the GOP had any balls (since we know they have no brains), Cankles' admission to rug munching would be a stake through her heart. I can see the commercials:
FDR: Governor of NY. Secretary of the Navy. Guided the US through WWII.
JFK: Senator. WWII veteran. Cool hand during Cuban Missle Crisis. Inspired the Apollo program.
LBJ: Senate hard dealer. Founder of the Great Society.
HRC: Lesbian.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 29, 2013 03:39 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 29, 2013 03:39 AM (b1/nQ)
Posted by: panzernashorn at May 29, 2013 03:39 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Dale Gribble at May 29, 2013 03:39 AM (JXtHh)
Posted by: Hunker down and L.I.B. at May 29, 2013 03:40 AM (Cs2tJ)
From the March 20, 2010 DenverPost a great collection of 137 photos of the Iraq War. A lot of the comments suck though. Typical leftist hate.
Below photo 137 are two linky arrows that go to other photo collections.
Posted by: ExSnipe at May 29, 2013 03:41 AM (PBm/l)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 29, 2013 03:41 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 03:41 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Dale Gribble at May 29, 2013 03:43 AM (JXtHh)
Posted by: Skandia Recluse at May 29, 2013 03:43 AM (9B71P)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 29, 2013 03:44 AM (XYSwB)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 07:41 AM (9Bj8R)
His clit was too small.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 29, 2013 03:44 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Case at May 29, 2013 03:44 AM (o00SF)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 03:46 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 03:46 AM (GJUgF)
GOP sent in their anti tea party trolls this morning
Posted by: Dale Gribble
Congressional summer interns....
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 29, 2013 03:46 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 03:47 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 29, 2013 03:49 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Elizabethe at May 29, 2013 03:49 AM (qPCAa)
Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at May 29, 2013 03:49 AM (XvrTA)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at May 29, 2013 03:49 AM (Y8t25)
>>>Romney and the GOP leadership knew what was happening with the IRS, they chose to do nothing.
Conspiracy theories are fun!
We get it; you hate Republicans. I'm sure you can give us a ton of reasons why. No need to make up false ones.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at May 29, 2013 03:50 AM (B2LxR)
On that LegalInsurrection.com post re: the QUARTER-sized Lego GI Joe "gun on the bus" story.
I was thinking about that story this morning. Had that been my kid, I would have walked him into the principal's office.
"What did he do?" "He brought a gun on the bus." "Really? Where is it?" "Right here." "OK, shoot off a round." "What?" You said it's a gun. So shoot it." "It's a toy gun." "Oh, so he really didn't bring a gun on the bus." "Yes, he did." "No, we've established it's a toy. It's not real. You admit that, right?" "Yes, but -" "So if he brought a toy hammer on the bus, would you have given him detention?"
And just keep going. Jam the idiocy right back into that propagandizing fuck's face. And do a press conference right outside the school. Name the assholes and shame them. Point out that they're idiots. Punch back twice as hard.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 29, 2013 03:51 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 03:51 AM (GJUgF)
Inside the Actors Studio host James Lipton reveals he did a "roaring trade" as a pimp in 1950s Paris
DailyMail
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 29, 2013 03:51 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: John Boehner, Weaker of the House at May 29, 2013 03:51 AM (xm1Dn)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 03:51 AM (9Bj8R)
Evidently jwest called out sick, so we get the substitute GOP knob polisher.
Posted by: Dale Gribble at May 29, 2013 07:39 AM (JXtHh)
For those not paying attention, I'm the one who calls out assholes like MMurcek who attack TEA Party conservatives.
Try to get it right, people.
Posted by: jwest at May 29, 2013 03:52 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 03:53 AM (9Bj8R)
Inside the Actors Studio host James Lipton reveals he did a "roaring trade" as a pimp in 1950s Paris
In other breaking news, sun to rise in east tomorrow.
First Cankles and now this. What makes people think that confessing to sexual aberration is praiseworthy?
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 29, 2013 03:54 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 03:54 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: John Boehner, Weaker of the House at May 29, 2013 03:55 AM (xm1Dn)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 03:55 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 03:56 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Comrade Juan McCain at May 29, 2013 03:57 AM (JQuNB)
Posted by: mindful webworker vs the Dept of Ed at May 29, 2013 03:57 AM (Bfbpz)
Gabriel Malor at May 29, 2013 07:50 AM (B2LxR)
Are you saying Romney and the GOP leadership *didn't* know?
That's about as troubling as if they *did* know. Certainly if the campaign did outreach they would have heard Tea Party groups complain about what the IRS was doing to them. Hell, Michael Steele today said he heard those complaints back when he was RNC chair. I'd expect someone as uncurious as Steele to dismiss it (and he did), but from the GOP Standard Bearer it is unforgiveable.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 03:57 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: zeera at May 29, 2013 03:57 AM (3dXwx)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 29, 2013 03:59 AM (b1/nQ)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 03:59 AM (GJUgF)
Fine. Go away. Attempted pandering populist politician that didn't pan out.
..and no real fight.
Never really liked her.
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at May 29, 2013 06:58 AM (JdUNu)
I saw a news report referring to her being wildly popular among Republicans. All I could do was shake my head and think that, if she was sooooooooooooo popular, why did she get her hat handed to her in the primaries?
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at May 29, 2013 04:00 AM (Gkhxf)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 04:01 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: FakeAssPosters at May 29, 2013 04:01 AM (cxl8k)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 29, 2013 04:02 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Admiral Marcus at May 29, 2013 04:03 AM (Jsiw/)
Appears this mornings posts are filled by Kos kids.
Posted by: FakeAssPosters
Summer. It hits all sites while the kids are on break and need to keep themselves busy.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 29, 2013 04:04 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Well-Informed Kos Kid at May 29, 2013 04:04 AM (JQuNB)
Posted by: Ian S. at May 29, 2013 04:05 AM (OevbG)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 04:05 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: lincolntf at May 29, 2013 04:06 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Dept. of Acuracy at May 29, 2013 04:06 AM (+I8Mq)
JackStraw at May 29, 2013 08:02 AM (g1DWB)
What "proof" did the IG have a year ago?
I'm saying back in 2010, Tea Party groups were on the receiving end of a lot of crap, they certainly knew it, and enough of them complained to the RNC to discern a pattern. Michael Steele didn't want to deal with it, and apparently in 2012 when the pattern was more complete, Romney didn't want to do it either.
And Romney even took a pass on Fast and Furious.
Wouldn't have taken much "proof" to start publicizing the questionnaires Tea Party groups were receiving back in 2010 and start calling for more investigations. The RNC and Romney apparently didn't want to do that - assuming they were even talking to Tea Party groups at all.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 04:06 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: Admiral Marcus at May 29, 2013 04:07 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 08:05 AM (GJUgF)
Oh well. It wouldn't be the first time I was called that. I just can't stand people who don't realize that they are wholly unsuited for a job especially when our nation's future is involved.
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at May 29, 2013 04:07 AM (Gkhxf)
Posted by: The Prophet John Fogerty at May 29, 2013 04:08 AM (p4U6S)
100 percent agree. I hope their ratings go in the tank. Tim Duncan is the epitome of class and actually would watch roughly 10 minutes of each game rather than 0 minutes if the "king" were in it. Watching Dallas and some white guy take the Heat in six a couple of years ago was a crowing achievement.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at May 29, 2013 04:09 AM (cK0tU)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 04:10 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: Dept. of Acuracy at May 29, 2013 04:10 AM (+I8Mq)
Posted by: Well-Informed Kos Kid at May 29, 2013 04:11 AM (JQuNB)
Posted by: Andy at May 29, 2013 04:11 AM (li+aS)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at May 29, 2013 04:11 AM (cK0tU)
>>>Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 07:57 AM
You know that as far back as 2011, GOP reps -- including dreaded "Establishment" congresscritters -- were complaining about IRS targeting, right? In fact, they demanded answers from IRS, which told them there was no targeting.
What else did you want them and Romney to do?
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at May 29, 2013 04:12 AM (B2LxR)
I used to post with regularity with the exception of the last two years. My advice to you as a new guy is to subtly bring you game instead of coming here and shitting all over the carpet. If you can't do that then you are the troll they are comparing you to.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at May 29, 2013 04:14 AM (cK0tU)
Andy at May 29, 2013 08:11 AM (li+aS)
I don't think it's a "conspiracy theory" to wonder why those Congressmen didn't make a big(ger) deal of their inquiries to the voting public.
Seems pretty simple to me, at least to someone who favors bare knuckle politics. Show a questionnaire received by a targeted group. Publicize the inquiry. Point out the IRS response/lie and juxtapose it against the questionnaire.
The mistake apparently was the GOP going directly to the IRS instead of making a campaign issue out of it.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 04:15 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 29, 2013 04:15 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 04:15 AM (9Bj8R)
Today is the 60th anniversary of New Zealander Sir Edmund Hillary and Nepalese Sherpa Tenzing Norgay reaching the summit of Mt. Everest.
And the HildeBeast's mommy named her after this not yet famous man. Lying cow.
Posted by: ExSnipe at May 29, 2013 04:15 AM (PBm/l)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 04:15 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: Admiral Marcus at May 29, 2013 04:15 AM (Jsiw/)
Gabriel Malor at May 29, 2013 08:12 AM (B2LxR)
See 142. If they had enough of an inkling to write a letter to the IRS, they had enough to make a campaign issue out of it.
And where did I mention the "establishment" dichotomy?
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 04:16 AM (tVWQB)
You just made my point. Make sure your turds are relatively hard, easier to clean up.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at May 29, 2013 04:17 AM (cK0tU)
Posted by: Anthony L. at May 29, 2013 04:17 AM (bl6Iq)
Posted by: Hillary! at May 29, 2013 04:18 AM (JQuNB)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 29, 2013 04:18 AM (zF6Iw)
Romney went after Obama hammer and tong on Obamacare, SS, illegal immigration .. every 3rd rail you can think of but you honestly believe he would have won big if he had just mentioned that there were reports that conservative groups were being unfairly targeted?
Okie dokie.
JackStraw at May 29, 2013 08:15 AM (g1DWB)
Well, I'd disagree with Romney going hammer and tong on all of that, but that aside...
The IRS is pretty much universally reviled, even among the LIVs. It is an issue that has legs, even at this late date.
My take is that the Romney people wanted to play nice and portray Obama as a nice fella who was out of his depth, not someone who was acting maliciously. Since the IRS actions didn't fit into that narrative, they took a pass on pursuing it.
But hey, if you don't think that any of this IRS stuff matters for 2014, we should just let it go since we tried to criticize Obamacare but still lost the Presidential election.....?
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 04:20 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 04:20 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: Andy at May 29, 2013 04:21 AM (li+aS)
Posted by: teej at May 29, 2013 04:22 AM (cWpCn)
Posted by: kreplach at May 29, 2013 04:22 AM (ihCPW)
Yeah, probably these guys.
http://binged.it/13ig00h
Posted by: Samuel Adams at May 29, 2013 04:22 AM (cK0tU)
Posted by: Andy at May 29, 2013 04:22 AM (li+aS)
And the HildeBeast's mommy named her after this not yet famous man. Lying cow.
Posted by: ExSnipe at May 29, 2013 08:15 AM (PBm/l)
Even though HRC was born 6 years before he climbed Everest.
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at May 29, 2013 04:22 AM (Gkhxf)
>>> And Romney even took a pass on Fast and Furious.
First google hit for "Romney fast and furious."
Presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney is ripping President Barack Obama for his transparency failures when it comes to the Operation Fast and Furious scandal and other matters.
Look, there's plenty to hit Romney on without just making shit up, guys.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at May 29, 2013 04:23 AM (B2LxR)
Good luck making a campaign issue out of it in 2012 when the Donks and their media allies will counter by running a clip of the IRS commissioner testifying under oath that there's no targeting.
Andy at May 29, 2013 08:21 AM (li+aS)
And then you point out the guy's statement in contrast with the questionnaire sent out and then connect the dots.
That the media is in the tank for Obama is not news, and it's a worn-out excuse I think.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 04:23 AM (tVWQB)
They are stealing billions and probably more like trillions if you count the civil service racket and to what?
Pass anti-fracking bills in states like Cali that obviously have such roaring economies they don't need billions....
Let it burn
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 29, 2013 04:23 AM (LRFds)
This. The GOP will not pursue criminal perjury so, they will wind up with shit all over their collective faces once again.
Posted by: Hunker down and L.I.B. at May 29, 2013 04:23 AM (Cs2tJ)
Posted by: blaster at May 29, 2013 04:24 AM (W6bkf)
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at May 29, 2013 04:24 AM (M8WWt)
It was the resignation of DeMint that freaked me out the most.
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 29, 2013 07:26 AM (XYSwB)
I agree, Bachmann has more balls than Boehner!
With the exception of her attempted run for GOP nominee, at least we know how she stands. She always stood up for our country, instead of her best interests.
Posted by: CarolT at May 29, 2013 04:24 AM (z4WKX)
Posted by: Fritz at May 29, 2013 04:25 AM (UzPAd)
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at May 29, 2013 04:26 AM (M8WWt)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 04:26 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: Admiral Marcus at May 29, 2013 04:26 AM (Jsiw/)
First google hit for "Romney fast and furious."
http://goo.gl/U5h9k
Presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney is ripping President Barack Obama for his transparency failures when it comes to the Operation Fast and Furious scandal and other matters.
Look, there's plenty to hit Romney on without just making shit up, guys.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at May 29, 2013 08:23 AM (B2LxR)
That was written 12:05 PM 07/17/2012. And it was a criticism of a lack of transparency. Pretty soft stuff, I think.
Plus I don't believe Romney even kept up with that milquetoast criticism. He preferred to try and focus on economic issues, not evidence of Presidential malfeasance.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 04:26 AM (tVWQB)
yeah it worked wonders for Bush in the wake of Katrina didn't it?
"I did not personally steer the hurricane into NOLA, and I did not order FEMA to fuck over NOLA, I was not in fact jerking off to their plight..."
//GW Bush
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 29, 2013 04:26 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 04:27 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: RWC at May 29, 2013 04:27 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at May 29, 2013 04:28 AM (M8WWt)
Posted by: Anthony L. at May 29, 2013 04:28 AM (bl6Iq)
Posted by: Andy at May 29, 2013 04:29 AM (li+aS)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at May 29, 2013 04:29 AM (cK0tU)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 04:31 AM (GJUgF)
>>>That was written 12:05 PM 07/17/2012. And it was a criticism of a lack of transparency. Pretty soft stuff, I think.
Fine, how 'bout when he brought it up in the October 16 debate:
“The greatest failure we’ve had with regards to gun violence, in some respects,” Romney said, “is what is known as ‘Fast and Furious,’ which was a program under this administration. And how it worked exactly — I think we don’t know precisely — but where thousands of automatic and AK-47-type weapons were given to people that ultimately gave them to drug lords [in Mexico].”
“They used those weapons against their own citizens and killed Americans with them. And was a program of the government.”
Look, I'm not going to do your homework for you. You claimed that Romney "took a pass" on Fast and Furious. That's false. I have demonstrated it is false. You either remembered wrong or you're just making shit up to suit your prejudices.
As I said before, there's plent of things to hit Romney over, made-up bullshit says more about the bullshitter than it does about Romney.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at May 29, 2013 04:31 AM (B2LxR)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 29, 2013 04:32 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: RWC at May 29, 2013 04:33 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Andy at May 29, 2013 04:33 AM (li+aS)
Andy at May 29, 2013 08:29 AM (li+aS)
So the better strategy is to do nothing, even though there's a genuine scandal there?
If the GOP leadership wasn't willing to make a case to the voters then that's a problem. Lord knows the Dems don't let a little he said she said get in the way of their narratives.....
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 04:33 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: Herman Cain at May 29, 2013 04:34 AM (VrVBw)
Posted by: Count de Monet at May 29, 2013 04:34 AM (BAS5M)
Bachmann? I always thought she was overrated. remember the anti-vaccine bandwaggon she hooked on to? The hiding in bushes to spy on some sort of gay rights rally? The lady had issues.
But I think that she would have won re-election in 2014 so I donÂ’t think it was motivated by fear of losing a race. IÂ’ll give her this, not enough congresscritters are able to step away after a short time in the House. If more did I think weÂ’d be better off.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 04:34 AM (yAor6)
Bachman.
NO body will ever be good enough for conservatives. We eat our own. The experiment is over.
Posted by: Cicero Kid at May 29, 2013 04:35 AM (jz0+s)
Posted by: DangerGirl @deadlyestrogen at May 29, 2013 04:36 AM (x1L8S)
>>They you didn't watch the election. Romney went the NAACP and made the centerpiece of his speech taking down Obamacare. He went to Florida and Arizona to talk about reforming SS. He was absolutely the most aggressive Republican in the race when it came to illegal immigration.
----------
I think yours is a subjective measure and I disagree. I didn't see him hit nearly as hard as I think he should have on any of that.
>>And yet I never said that. I've been saying here since the IG report came out that this is the one scandal that can really hurt Obama. But it won't be overnight as much as we all might want it to.
-----------
But by your standard, the IG would have taken a pass on it as well. And I think it could have gone a long way in avoiding a 2012 loss if the GOP pushed harder for an investigation back in 2010.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 04:36 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: lincolntf at May 29, 2013 04:37 AM (ZshNr)
http://blustream.sendvideo.net/stw/?p=nyi907f2201klkgtjiy
Posted by: chain mail at May 29, 2013 04:37 AM (llmtw)
I think you misspelled "republicans" bachman is an interesting case study in the inability of the GOP coalition to cover down ala Donkey coverage for Hank Johnson et al...
yes now some RINO will thump its chest and say "we are BETTER than that and the public yadda yadda" if there's room for Nanzi "pass it to let people be artists" Pelousy there was room for Ms Tardasil....
ah well fuck it... just another brick in the wall
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 29, 2013 04:38 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 04:38 AM (GJUgF)
If you want to know how the Special Forces and the military feel about Benghazi and TFG, take a look at this 50-second video !!
Short and to-the-point.
http://blustream.sendvideo.net/stw/?p=nyi907f2201klkgtjiyv
Posted by: chain mail at May 29, 2013 04:38 AM (llmtw)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 29, 2013 04:39 AM (da5Wo)
"You know, it's a mystery to me why any conservative would even go into politics."
It goes beyond "conservative". Why would any normal, well-adjusted person get into politics? What kind of maniac wishes to endure the 24/7 media rectal, the fact that half the country hates your guts the moment you declare, horse trading above doing the right thing, constant pandering to raise funds, etc.?
What kind of maniac? Usually a malignant narcissist who doesn't care what people think about him just so long as people think about him as he's playing games with their lives. The kind of person who will pig out at the public trough and do literally anything to maintain his spot "because he's better and he deserves it".
It is the truly rare bird who breaks that mold.
Posted by: Jaws at May 29, 2013 04:39 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 04:40 AM (9Bj8R)
Boehner has repeatedly violated the Hassert Rule and allowed legislation to pass with votes of liberal Republicans and Democrats and against the strong objections of conservatives. This kind of thing along with trying to strong-arm conservatives and messing with committee assignments sows dissension among the House and is destructive, encouraging dissension, back-stabbing and leaks.
At a time when we could use a strong, determined voice to speak out against all the scandals, to demand accountability, to represent the Republican party in front of the TV cameras and speak to why Republican & conservative values that include a less centralized all-powerful large government would benefit the American people, we have....weakness.
Posted by: jeannebodine at May 29, 2013 04:40 AM (LBBS3)
i'm also a vetran of ace's going back to 2008. getting sensitive over what people think of me here would be un-moron of me. if people think I'm a kos kid after I sent money to Republican groups and voted against Obama twice that's their prerogative.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 04:40 AM (yAor6)
time in the House. If more did I think weÂ’d be better off. Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 08:34 AM
Bachmann spent EIGHT YEARS in the House. That anyone considers this a "short time" reveals one of the current major problems we face.
Relegating the "career politician" to Passenger Pigeon status (extinct) would go a long way toward fixing the mess. Congress would be much better off (and so would we) if fuckweasels like Reid, Bitch McCullough, Pelosi and Boner knew they'd automatically be sent to the glue factory after six years.
Posted by: MrScribbler at May 29, 2013 04:41 AM (mHrip)
If and when I receive them, I will need y'all to email me an address.
Oh my gentle Jesus!!! WOOOOOOOT!!!
DangerGirl, you are the best!
Posted by: EC at May 29, 2013 04:41 AM (GQ8sn)
Look, I'm not going to do your homework for you. You claimed that Romney "took a pass" on Fast and Furious. That's false. I have demonstrated it is false. Youeither remembered wrong or you're just making shit up to suit your prejudices.
As I said before, there's plent of things to hit Romney over, made-up bullshit says more about the bullshitter than it does about Romney.
Gabriel Malor at May 29, 2013 08:31 AM (B2LxR)
And again, as I said, pretty milquetoast stuff because he cast it as some unknown policy instead of direct malfeasance, and criticized Obama on hypocrisy grounds.
From where I sit, that's giving Obama a pass because it opens the door for Obama to claim ignorance and blame Bush, both of which Obama did.
So no, I'm not making shit up. I'm saying I don't believe Romney went after Fast and Furious in any effective way, which amounts to taking a pass on it.
BTW, I've not attacked you personally at all on this, and yet here you are calling me a liar/fantasist. I think that's pretty scummy, honestly.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 04:41 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: Cicero Kid at May 29, 2013 04:41 AM (jz0+s)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 04:41 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Admiral Marcus at May 29, 2013 04:42 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: "Franklin" at May 29, 2013 04:42 AM (YjCv8)
No, you're the only turd here this morning. By the way troll fuckstick, since you seem to have all the answers, who is your guy to lead us away from all this dumbfuckery?
Posted by: Samuel Adams at May 29, 2013 04:42 AM (cK0tU)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 29, 2013 04:42 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Anthony L. at May 29, 2013 04:42 AM (bl6Iq)
Now what are we talking about?
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 29, 2013 08:39 AM (da5Wo)
Autographed glossies of Andrea Tantaros. Otherwise known as "teh precious".
Posted by: EC at May 29, 2013 04:42 AM (GQ8sn)
Man brings his pony in liquor store....
http://tinyurl.com/q7qkx6b
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 29, 2013 04:43 AM (X6akg)
8 years in the House is short compared to most congressmen and women
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 04:43 AM (yAor6)
Perry was a flop because he wasn't a silver-tongued orator and stumbled in the debates. Can was fine until Gloria Allred showed up with her usual women as victims mode. The fact that Cain was still married to his first wife while Newt was a thrice-married type was apparently not worthy of comment.
I could go on. Every single person in the GOP wants THEIR candidate and if they don't get THAT candidate, they will spend the rest of their days proving, with geometrical logic, that THEY ARE BY GOD RIGHT AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN LISTENED TO!
I despair. No one sees that this constant tearing down of candidates is destructive to the party AND to conservatism.
This comment will probably elicit additional snarky comments, but I stand by it.
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 29, 2013 04:44 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 29, 2013 04:44 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 04:44 AM (GJUgF)
JackStraw at May 29, 2013 08:42 AM (g1DWB)
Didn't you suggest that the GOP leadership couldn't be expected to make an issue out of something because the IRS guy denied under oath that there was goofy stuff going on?
So what issue would there be to insist on an investigation?
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 04:45 AM (tVWQB)
Obama calls tornado ravaged town by the wrong name. Can you imagine if Bush did that? O'Rourke was right, Obama is stupid.
Posted by: Minnfidel at May 29, 2013 04:45 AM (bXdYS)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 29, 2013 04:45 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 04:46 AM (GJUgF)
Here, here!
Thank you, very much DG!
Posted by: EC at May 29, 2013 04:46 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 29, 2013 04:46 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at May 29, 2013 08:24 AM (M8WWt)
But the optics! And the loss of comity! The NYT will say mean things about us! People will hate us! Obama won't bring us flowers any more!
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 29, 2013 04:46 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 08:41 AM (tVWQB)
-- That is how it rolls
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at May 29, 2013 04:47 AM (R8hU8)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 04:47 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 08:43 AM
That's my point, obviously.
The worthless Democrat POS running for Senate in MA has spent his entire friggin' so-called adult life as a "servant of the people." That's something like 37 years.
To me, that's like putting someone on Special Welfare forever. The difference, of course, is that he gets a whole hell of a lot more from taxpayers than a Section 8 voucher and EBT card.
And it needs to stop.
Posted by: MrScribbler at May 29, 2013 04:48 AM (mHrip)
Posted by: RWC at May 29, 2013 04:48 AM (fWAjv)
Run along son and get me a cup of coffee on your way out.
Posted by: Samuel Adams at May 29, 2013 04:48 AM (cK0tU)
>>>BTW, I've not attacked you personally at all on this, and yet here you are calling me a liar/fantasist.
I also said you could have a bad memory.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at May 29, 2013 04:48 AM (B2LxR)
Posted by: "Franklin" at May 29, 2013 04:48 AM (YjCv8)
Posted by: lincolntf at May 29, 2013 04:49 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 04:49 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 29, 2013 04:49 AM (da5Wo)
bingo
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 04:49 AM (yAor6)
>>Know what? Everyone, well everyone paying attention, heard that the Tea Party and other conservative groups were complaining about the IRS. What proof did anyone have a year ago that they were in fact targeting those groups?
-----
>>We have an opponent who has lied, misled and refused to turn over documents for years. It's going to take a lot of hearings and time to get the proof that will really galvanize people who only moderately pay attention to politics, i.e. the vast majority of the voting public.
----
Well, JackStraw, that's what I'm reading from you. If there wasn't enough proof to make a campaign issue out of it, what proof existed that was sufficient for the IG to spend resources to begin to investigate it?
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 04:49 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 29, 2013 04:50 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Ed Anger at May 29, 2013 04:50 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 04:50 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: RWC at May 29, 2013 04:52 AM (fWAjv)
FIFY
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at May 29, 2013 08:00 AM (OWjjx)
I'm the one who calls out assholes like MMurcek who attack Sarah Palin, Pat Toomey, Marco Rubio and now Michelle Bachman.
Posted by: jwest at May 29, 2013 04:52 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 29, 2013 04:52 AM (da5Wo)
San Antonio will eat them alive. I'm a Heat fan but if they get past the Pacers I highly doubt they'll beat the Spurs. the Heat are clearly a good team and could end up champs again but I don't think they are as good as people hype them up to be.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 04:52 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at May 29, 2013 04:52 AM (LRFds)
Gabriel Malor at May 29, 2013 08:48 AM (B2LxR)
And the snark is unwarranted. You don't have absolute dominion over the interpretation of events.
Romney effectively took a pass on F&F by talking about it in the most milquetoast of ways. He never pursued it the way it should have been pursued, and I believe if he didn't have at least a fair inkling of the IRS issue then he should have.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 04:54 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 04:54 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: RWC at May 29, 2013 04:55 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 29, 2013 04:55 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Vote Lord Humungus 2016 at May 29, 2013 04:55 AM (HEa5q)
I would agree with this, however keep in mind that come that foreign policy debate Romney's pollsters were telling him he was going to win a close race. Unfortunately for them they were counting on a much more balanced electorate while they were botching GOTV compared to the Obama's team superior turn out machine.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 04:55 AM (yAor6)
**************************************************
Preach it, sister! Even in the run-up to the nomination, it's a life and death battle that never sleeps. It's really quite an unusual phenomenon to observe.
I was impressed how pretty much everyone accepted Romney once he received the nomination - eventually (either that or they disappeared off the site). I was not a Romney person but once he was nominated and the campaign began, I really got on board and felt hopeful. Well, we all know how that turned out.
Posted by: jeannebodine at May 29, 2013 04:56 AM (LBBS3)
Posted by: blaster at May 29, 2013 04:56 AM (W6bkf)
You know what's interesting....
If I came here in 2010 and said that the IRS was deliberately targeting Tea Party groups, Gabe and co. would have written me off as a conspiracy theorist.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 04:56 AM (tVWQB)
Controversial comments today, but the harsh truth. People who aren't aware of how DC works and/or don't pay taxes should not be voting.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 04:56 AM (yAor6)
Gabe? Andy? Bueller?
All this is, is a shit-stirrrer. Can we bounce this crap
LGF in 3 -2 - 1...
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 04:56 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 29, 2013 04:57 AM (bb5+k)
AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 08:55 AM (yAor6)
Agreed, and I hope we can agree that the third debate turned out to be a disaster for Romney.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 04:57 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at May 29, 2013 04:58 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 29, 2013 04:58 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 29, 2013 04:59 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 04:59 AM (tVWQB)
I also seem to remember a lot of cowards wringing their hands over the Iraq War surge as well.
How much dissent do you want a sitting president to have to endure? My personal opinion is that the irrational hatred for Harriet Meiers and the failure of people to understand that McCain's immigration plan was not the one W submitted was by far and away the cause of his falling support which lost us the House in 2006.
I notice the pundits and radio talk show hosts remain gainfully employed. THEIR reputations seem secure, no matter hat bird-brained candidate they support nor what issue the push.
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 29, 2013 04:59 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 04:59 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: maddogg at May 29, 2013 04:59 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 29, 2013 05:00 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: mindful webworker and the ampersands of abyssinia at May 29, 2013 05:00 AM (rf20m)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 29, 2013 07:26 AM (XYSwB)
**
This^^done blowed my shit up.
Morn' ya'll
Posted by: dananjcon at May 29, 2013 05:01 AM (jvd3N)
Posted by: lincolntf at May 29, 2013 05:01 AM (ZshNr)
JackStraw at May 29, 2013 08:58 AM (g1DWB)
I guess where I'm coming from is that the burden is much lower for a campaign issue than it is for the IG to do something. Framed correctly by a friendly campaign, who knows...it could have motivated more folks to turn out for Romney. Aren't we told that he effectively lost by like 400k votes?
I would think a Congressperson could get ahold of approved applications for liberal groups directly from the IRS, no? Wouldn't that be proof?
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 05:02 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: That Guy at May 29, 2013 05:02 AM (iPq1D)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 29, 2013 05:02 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 05:02 AM (yAor6)
It's been around. Searching the hash results in a bunch of comments similar to today's.
I've been around. Conservative all my life, don't wish ill on anyone who wants to carry the brand, but wary of anyone who tarnishes it, even inadvertently.
Want to trash me because I don't say things you like?
Go For It...
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 05:04 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: painful stool at May 29, 2013 05:04 AM (e+kCH)
+1
*awards Platinum VIP Membership to MW*
Posted by: EC at May 29, 2013 05:04 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: maddogg at May 29, 2013 05:04 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: DangerGirl @deadlyestrogen at May 29, 2013 05:05 AM (jlm/B)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 29, 2013 05:05 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 29, 2013 05:06 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 29, 2013 05:06 AM (da5Wo)
Thanks again DG!
Posted by: EC at May 29, 2013 05:06 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: That Guy at May 29, 2013 05:06 AM (iPq1D)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 05:07 AM (9Bj8R)
Actually it's a red district that voted for McCain and Romney by double digits even while O won the state (won it by 10 in 08, 7 in 12). The district SHOULD stay red after she retires.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 05:07 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Ed Anger at May 29, 2013 05:07 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 05:08 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: blaster at May 29, 2013 05:08 AM (W6bkf)
Hence, Weiner-Holder '16.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at May 29, 2013 07:18 AM (+98Gb)
Bwaney Fwank: I don't suppose there would be a cabinet wevel spot for me? Maybe even pwess secwetawy
Posted by: TheQuietMan at May 29, 2013 05:09 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: maddogg at May 29, 2013 05:09 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 05:09 AM (9Bj8R)
Let's say that Romney started showing an approved application from a liberal group. Liberals would have responded by showing Karl Rove's Crossroads 501C3 approved application and screaming about the Koch brothers.
Winner?
JackStraw at May 29, 2013 09:05 AM (g1DWB)
I'd think they complained about Karl Rove and the Koch brothers anyway, plus to the people we're trying to convince Karl Rove =/= Tea Party. Heck, Karl Rove has the resources to fight an overbearing IRS, something smaller groups couldn't do. That's another useful frame to it. Mention that democracy is best served by grass roots groups instead of giant conglomorations of politically-connected insiders and at least there's an issue there. Would it have been a giant vote turner? Who knows (as you said), but I don't think we needed to turn/motivate all that many votes to win 2012 anyway.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 05:10 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 29, 2013 05:10 AM (da5Wo)
Lessee... Palin is gone. Bachmann just said she is leaving. Their fans resort to name calling. Winners all around.
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 05:11 AM (GJUgF)
Still take Bachmann over Nancy Pelosi, Shirley Jackson-Lee, Barbara Lee, Carolyn Maloney, Rosa deLauro, Maxine Waters, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, or Hillary.
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at May 29, 2013 05:11 AM (QXlbZ)
Well it should be nice and cool for them
Posted by: Jean at May 29, 2013 05:11 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: Blacksheep at May 29, 2013 05:11 AM (bS6uW)
to be fair Bachmann always had closer races then she should have in that district. However a mid-term electorate is much different then a Presidential election electorate and should heavily favor the Republican in that race.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 05:11 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 05:11 AM (9Bj8R)
Today's batch doesn't even bother. Skips straight to nyah-nyah.
I think we need a new batch of trolls. <.< This one's just... boring. ._.
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at May 29, 2013 05:11 AM (a31Nq)
Posted by: That Guy at May 29, 2013 05:12 AM (iPq1D)
>>>Liberals would have responded by showing Karl Rove's Crossroads 501C3 approved application and screaming about the Koch brothers.
Well, yeah, except that the IRS sat on Crossroads GPS' application just like they did Tea Party groups. (This, btw, destroys the current claim that IRS targeted only Tea Party groups and not so-called "GOP Establishment" groups.)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at May 29, 2013 05:12 AM (B2LxR)
Yet it ultimately was a failure, in some ways. They managed to cement a reputation of conservatives as mean-spirited people who don't care about national parks or children. The overreach of impeachment has effectively removed that tool for us with Obama. And we lost the House eventually.
Clinton emerged from 2 full terms more popular than one would have thought, and he shamelessly goes around the world making speeches and butting in where he should remain silent.
And Gingrich? After he had to RESIGN his speakership due to the information about his affairs which were on-going while he was attacking Clinton, he waltzed around making money on the rubber chicken circuit, got a gig on Fox, wrote a couple more books, and married Callista. Then he ran for president and refused to get out of the race long after it was apparent he wouldn't win.
The 90's scenario cannot be repeated first of all, because Obama is not Clinton. Secondly, any threats we make through the House will be immediately demonized or ignored. (Everyone thinks Boehner has done nothing about a variety of issues and attacks him constantly, unaware that he has passed legislation which languishes on Harry Reid's desk.)
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 29, 2013 05:12 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 29, 2013 09:10 AM (da5Wo)
It puts the lotion on the fist.
Posted by: EC at May 29, 2013 05:13 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at May 29, 2013 05:13 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 08:59 AM (tVWQB)
Utterly useless idea.
In order to get started in politics in many places you have to be comfortably well off to begin with. Since we've made politics a career that's the way it goes.
Consider that if I wanted to run for State Rep in my district, I'd be up against a retired lawyer worth considerably more than I am, who can draw on her other lawyer friends for help.
Ergo: I couldn't run if I wanted to, because I have to hold down a job to keep the roof over my head. (Well I'm looking for a job again, but the point remains, I can't stop looking just to bounce a prog out of the state house.)
Posted by: tsrblke at May 29, 2013 05:14 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: That Guy at May 29, 2013 05:14 AM (iPq1D)
Bachmann only won by 5000 votes last election.
Posted by: maddogg
But that race drew extra attention and money from Team Democrat because Bachmann was running. With nondescript well meaning Republican 1207 running, the district political demographics would seem to make it a safe hold.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 29, 2013 05:15 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 29, 2013 05:15 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 29, 2013 09:06 AM (bb5+k)
There's a boatload of wisdom in these two sentences. Going to steal this paragraph for usage with a couple of folks I know.
<_< It's gonna blow their minds, and probably a gasket or two.
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at May 29, 2013 05:15 AM (a31Nq)
That's some straight up Moron stuff there.
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 29, 2013 09:10 AM (da5Wo)
Yes and yes
Posted by: TheQuietMan at May 29, 2013 05:15 AM (1Jaio)
(This, btw, destroys the current claim that IRS targeted only Tea Party groups and not so-called "GOP Establishment" groups.)
Gabriel Malor at May 29, 2013 09:12 AM (B2LxR)
Who is claiming that? I believe the IRS used keywords like "tea party" and "patriot" to scan for applications, but I don't think anyone ever said the targeting was limited to Tea Party groups.
Plus, Karl Rove is not exactly an unknown guy, so Lerner or someone was probably aware enough of him to flag his application anyway.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 05:16 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 29, 2013 05:18 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Admiral Marcus at May 29, 2013 05:18 AM (Jsiw/)
And if he were making a cross-country run to raise awareness of Jesus Christ, he would be treated as a nutjob.
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at May 29, 2013 05:18 AM (QXlbZ)
why am I not surprised
Posted by: mama winger at May 29, 2013 05:18 AM (P6QsQ)
You can call somebody you disagree with a schoolyard name. You believe you are the future of the GOP.
Gawd help us all...
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 05:19 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: zsasz at May 29, 2013 05:20 AM (K0ke1)
Posted by: EC at May 29, 2013 05:20 AM (GQ8sn)
(Everyone thinks Boehner has done nothing about a variety of issues and attacks him constantly, unaware that he has passed legislation which languishes on Harry Reid's desk.)
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 29, 2013 09:12 AM (GoIUi)
Everything is optics, dear lady. If Boehner passes legislation and Reid stifles it, does a voter know?
Look, I'll lay my cards on the table: I'm a Murray Chotiner / Chuck Colson conservative. I mean, "get them by the balls first, then their hearts and minds will follow." During one of the debates, I would have loved for Romney to stand there, saying nothing after one of the JEFs blatherings and when asked if he had a response, look right at the cokehead and say, "I'm just waiting until this jackass has a glass of water to wash down that incredible bunch of lies."
If Reid is holding up legislation, Boehner should make that his one and only message. "You want answers? Fuck you - go talk to that kiddie porn addict at the Majority Leader's desk."
But that's also why I could never make it in politics.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 29, 2013 05:20 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Pyrocles at May 29, 2013 05:21 AM (cv5Iw)
Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 29, 2013 09:20 AM (zF6Iw)
Well, you'd have my vote. I guess that's two.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 05:21 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: soothsayer at May 29, 2013 05:22 AM (uaJ2E)
Posted by: Jean at May 29, 2013 05:23 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 29, 2013 05:23 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 29, 2013 05:24 AM (g1DWB)
He's not regular today.
He's learning from the Head Ewok. Expect a dump post by noon.
Posted by: EC at May 29, 2013 05:24 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at May 29, 2013 05:24 AM (B2LxR)
@332 UGH. really? these people are fucking nuts. just keep chumming along with socialism while our economy collapses.
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at May 29, 2013 05:24 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: zsasz at May 29, 2013 05:24 AM (1LlFS)
Addendum - when the MFM says, "How do you know Reid likes kiddie porn?" my Boehner would respond, "That's what my sources say. Tell you what - when Reid tells you who gave him Romney's tax information, I'll tell you who has proof he's a short-eyes."
If we must go down, then take as many of the fuckers with us as we can.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 29, 2013 05:24 AM (zF6Iw)
I think that was it. She looked good too!
Posted by: EC at May 29, 2013 05:24 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 07:30 AM (9Bj8R)
*****
I'll do it. I always hated the way that guy tossed those flaming torches!
Posted by: The Trapeze Artist at May 29, 2013 05:25 AM (pxDth)
Posted by: EC at May 29, 2013 09:20 AM (GQ8sn)
Chrissy got really pissy over that. He starting flapping his arms and foaming at the mouth
Posted by: TheQuietMan at May 29, 2013 05:25 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 29, 2013 05:25 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 29, 2013 05:25 AM (bb5+k)
Yup. He got called on his asshattery and he couldn't take it.
Posted by: EC at May 29, 2013 05:27 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: soothsayer at May 29, 2013 05:27 AM (qpM85)
Diogenes: Thanks. I have nothing against Bachmann, "crazy eyes" comment, which I regret, notwithstanding.
We are in a fight to the death, we need the best soldiers we can get. No Akins, McDonoughs or others that sometimes say the right things and other times say stuff the left wing media machine can sharpen their teeth on.
Hugh Hewitt wrote a book: "If it's not close, they can't cheat"
We need candidates who know: "If I don't say anything overtly stupid, they will have to slander me."
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 05:27 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 29, 2013 05:28 AM (bb5+k)
------------------
Just like Romney. Yeah, that's the ticket.
Posted by: mama winger at May 29, 2013 05:28 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: M. Murcet at May 29, 2013 05:28 AM (e+kCH)
You know what other programs the Koch's support?
Nova. On PBS.
OMG!!! PBS IS A KOCH BROTHERS OPERATION!!!!
Posted by: EC at May 29, 2013 05:28 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: eman at May 29, 2013 05:28 AM (cQ4xo)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at May 29, 2013 05:29 AM (9Bj8R)
The election wasn't about the IRS it was about Obama. Obama could have done then what he has done now, claim he had no idea what was going on, say an investigation needs to be done to get to the bottom of it, express his outrage that groups were being targeted and the msm would have carried his water. In my mind, end of electoral issue. There was no time do to the actual investigation in 2011 or 2012.
JackStraw at May 29, 2013 09:24 AM (g1DWB)
Well, IIRC (that's for you, Gabe), the narrative of the Romney campaign was that Obama was basically incompetent. If Obama pleads ignorance, he just feeds that narrative, right?
And in that telling, an investigation starts. Of course, it would be dragged on past November, just as Benghazi was, but in my mind an aggressive campaign could have been making all sorts of hay about it up until November. And I don't think we would have needed to convince millions of people anyway, since the electoral math suggests a comparative few would have turned the election the other way.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 29, 2013 05:29 AM (tVWQB)
Here in Texas a few years ago there was a case where a student brought an actual gun to school and used it to shoot and wound a bully. The DA tried him as an adult.
This being Texas and not some crazy blue state - the jury found the kid not guilty by reason of self defense - since the testimony established that the school did nothing to stop the bullying. After losing the DA went bat-shit crazy predicting a collapse of society and the creation of "wild west schools". Of course all that happened was a local collapse of bullying.
Amazing how bullies are nothing but people pulling shit because they think they can get away with it - sort of like the current administration - who'd of thunk it?
Posted by: [/i] An Observation at May 29, 2013 05:29 AM (ylhEn)
-------------------
There is an entire party made up of people like that. Can't recall the name offhand.
Posted by: mama winger at May 29, 2013 05:30 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: soothsayer at May 29, 2013 09:27 AM (qpM85)
Nah. It'll be a "Kinnock 1982" sticker scribbled over in crayon.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 29, 2013 05:30 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: eman at May 29, 2013 05:30 AM (cQ4xo)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 29, 2013 05:32 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: eman at May 29, 2013 05:33 AM (cQ4xo)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 29, 2013 05:34 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 05:34 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: soothsayer at May 29, 2013 05:34 AM (E1X66)
>>>Gabe, the charge is the IRS is abusing power. You don't ask the IRS if they are abusing power and just accept their answer.
I see. Wimps wait for evidence. Fighters just make unfounded allegations and hope the general public never asks for evidence. Got it.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at May 29, 2013 05:34 AM (B2LxR)
Exactly! Why do we play along with the Left's attacks on Bachmann (crazy eyes, etc.)? She had her faults (as many have mentioned up thread), but there are a lot more crazy and dumb Democrats who continue to occupy space in Congress that are treated with more respect by the MSM and the Left: Jesse Jackson Jr. (before he officially flipped out), Sheila Jackson Lee (affirmative action for naming hurricanes!), Denni Kucinich (how was he there that long?), Hank Johnson (Guam tipping over), etc. And then there are Senators like Barbara Boxer and Patty Murray. I'll take Bachmann over any of those Dem nuts and bimbos.
Posted by: Lizzy at May 29, 2013 05:35 AM (aLkUb)
I will grant that we should be running ads, but since we NEVER run ads about pending legislation, I am assuming this is something that the RNC is unwilling to do, which is not Boehner's fault. For all I know the RNC is prohibited from doing so.
So how come other groups aren't running those ads? We had ads from a conservative group attacking our GOP legislature when they wouldn't go fo the full 10% income tax cut Governor Pence wanted. Why aren't these jackwagons running ads about national stuff?
Just saying something, over and over again, doesn't get you publicity on thenetworks, as surely you know by now.
Also, I wouldn't exactly pattern myself after the early Chuck Colson, who after all went to prison. His later prison ministry, however, did a lot of good.
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 29, 2013 05:35 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: JackStraw at May 29, 2013 05:36 AM (g1DWB)
She had her faults...
Why pretend she didn't? Why pretend that for any pol? Or anyone else, for that matter?
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 05:37 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 29, 2013 05:37 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: eman at May 29, 2013 05:38 AM (cQ4xo)
------------
They had evidence. They had testimony and complaints and letters and stories. This isn't a jury trial we are talking about - this is a political campaign. Whiffs of scandal, rumors, questions of impropriety are suddenly off limits in political campaigns without evidence admissable in a court of law.
And they were most certainly NOT unfounded.
Posted by: mama winger at May 29, 2013 05:38 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: North Dallas Thirty at May 29, 2013 05:41 AM (62WS0)
I think in some ways we should have gone with Trump, but although he is Famous and says some hard truths in between the BS, I would bet money he wouldn't do it in a campaign.
So, if we are going to lose, I say go with someone who will just say whatever, like Cruz.
I am always reminded of how disoriented the democrats got when the GOP showed up to protest the Florida recount. They weren't used to us standing up for ourselves.
It's something to think about. Now, off I go to do some actual work.
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 29, 2013 05:47 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: buzzion at May 29, 2013 05:53 AM (LI48c)
His remark were captured by a hot-mic, while the cameras focused on country music star Blake Shelton.
Posted by: Unsinkable Molly Brown at May 29, 2013 06:03 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 06:06 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: T. at May 29, 2013 06:21 AM (49aO2)
Posted by: M. Murcek at May 29, 2013 06:34 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: T. at May 29, 2013 06:36 AM (49aO2)
He insisted such action is “prudent” given the threat climate change poses to living standards worldwide. But, he said, human action is merely a “possible cause”.
Asked on Tuesday night whether it was better to take action to mitigate the effects of climate change than to prevent it in the first place, he said: “The first thing to say is it does not represent any threat to the survival of the planet. None at all. The planet has survived much bigger changes than any climate change that is happening now.
Posted by: Alexander Hamilton at May 29, 2013 07:16 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Y-not at May 29, 2013 07:23 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: T. Trollek at May 29, 2013 07:34 AM (WMsq+)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at May 29, 2013 11:44 AM (qyfb5)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.229 seconds, 512 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Me at May 29, 2013 02:51 AM (W6wuT)