June 13, 2013
— Gabriel Malor Happy Thursday.
So. ...So. Now that we've got that out of the way, a question keeps popping up in whenever Edward Snowden's claims get questioned. It is important, easy to answer, and gets right to the heart of the problem with Snowden's claims: "If you don't believe Snowden's claims, how do you explain the U.S. government's determination to prosecute?"
Easy. He provided classified information to journalists. At a minimum, we know he provided the PRISM slides -- which, if you will recall, were marked Top Secret -- and the secret Verizon warrant to Glenn Greenwald. Greenwald also said Snowden gave him "thousands" of other documents. So there's no doubt Snowden broke the law (as well as his oath). Of course he should be prosecuted.
My skepticism extends to the claims he makes that go beyond the content of the PRISM slides. His claims are utterly uncorroborated and, indeed, have been resoundingly denied by everyone in a position to know. I have no reason to believe the word of Snowden, a man I had never heard of before last week. I have no reason to believe the word of Clapper, a man with his own credibility problems. Quite simply, I'm not willing to devote my attention to half-formed, possibly half-baked accusations. There'll be an investigation. Let it do its thing.
Besides, the secret phone warrants is a much juicier scandal. First, the existence of the program has actually been confirmed and we definitively know it targeted Americans. Second, and here's the horrifying part, it might even be legal. Which brings me back to the point I made when these scandals broke: the fix isn't going to merely be whacking NSA on the nose and telling it to follow the law. The law appears to be the problem. If you want to fix this, the ultimate goal has to be putting NSA and the FISA court on shorter leashes, which will take congressional action.
In the meantime, I believe there are just a few other things on our plate. The EPA scandals are my area of emphasis because I dislike that particular agency's actions over the years more than most and, as with the IRS, we have evidence that the EPA's actions were taken to intentionally disfavor conservative groups and to benefit liberal groups. That type of corruption is far more likely to result in a correction than a simple nonpartisan, bureaucratic "oops." Why do you think the Democrats spent so much time lying about the IRS scandal just being the fault of some rogue agents in Cincinnati?
In other news, SCOTUS will release opinions at 10 AM in one or more cases argued this term. Possible topics include: affirmative action in college admissions, the Voting Rights Act, Prop 8, DOMA, and gene patents.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:30 AM
| Comments (333)
Post contains 470 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: NSA at June 13, 2013 02:32 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 02:38 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: T. at June 13, 2013 02:40 AM (+GDxM)
I'm dreading SCOTUS decisions. Ugh.
In other news, I got RT'd by Ann Coulter last night for my tweet about her epic Hannity appearance. I was pretty excited, lol! So much so, I'm bragging to you guys about it
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at June 13, 2013 02:40 AM (KL49F)
Prediction:
The blatantly unconstitutional VRA will be affirmed once again with a 5-4 decision.
AA will get a new lease on life after being shot down before. This despite the fact that is flagrantly violates the CRA of 1964.
Posted by: Vic at June 13, 2013 02:40 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 02:40 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 02:41 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at June 13, 2013 02:41 AM (uhAkr)
So don't look for anything good from the robed turds today.
Posted by: Vic at June 13, 2013 02:43 AM (lZvxr)
So there's no doubt Snowden broke the law (as well as his oath). Of course he should be prosecuted.
HAHAHA. God that made me laugh so hard. I thought that breaking the law and oaths didn't matter anymore these days. We need a brand new jail just to house all the politicians who have broken the law, not to mention their oaths.Posted by: spypeach at June 13, 2013 02:44 AM (0n1+D)
Posted by: Andy at June 13, 2013 02:45 AM (li+aS)
It has to do with the 'wave of the world' - which is a similar phenomenon that will now manifest itself in various places like Hollywood, the Internet, and so forth. They, being a worldly movement, can only rise so high before their own weight brings them down. The corruption that is now utterly rampant reveals that because they were losing momentum, they got desperate and tried to 'cheat' a little more than usual.
According to the shape of a sine wave, the acceleration will begin to taper as you reach the top; it's disconcerting if you suspect cycles but want to believe in linear progress.
Posted by: RiverC at June 13, 2013 02:46 AM (KTytI)
http://tinyurl.com/kpq3dlk
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 02:46 AM (brJMf)
Posted by: AE at June 13, 2013 02:47 AM (HYceo)
But that doesn't matter, lying to congress now is a felony.
Posted by: Vic at June 13, 2013 02:47 AM (lZvxr)
I got nothing, either. I am having an increasingly difficult time keeping my - frankly - murderous rage at this gangster administration, its media enablers and its willing GOP collaborators in check. It's best for my mental health and for Ace's peace of mind that I stop commenting beyond just a morning story and absent myself from the HQ for a while to concentrate on my writing. So I'm going to shut down until I can get better control of myself.
I'll just leave you with two quick Shirley Temple stories:
Temple’s career stumbled – and finally crashed – in the 1940s, as she grew up, because her fans (like Mary Pickford’s nearly three decades previously) didn’t want to face the fact that she wasn’t a little girl anymore. When watching a sneak preview of 1947s That Hagen Girl, as soon as co-star Ronald Reagan asked the 19 year-old Shirley, “I love you, will you marry me?” the audience broke out in groans and cries of “Oh, no!” The producers ended up cutting the line before releasing the film.
Another anecdote: in the late 1960s when Temple ran for office in California, one of her campaign posters was a large picture of her as a child star, with the words If you don’t vote for me, I’ll hold my breath!”
Hope you all have a wonderful day.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at June 13, 2013 02:49 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 02:51 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 02:52 AM (brJMf)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 13, 2013 02:53 AM (9Bj8R)
Gaylord Focker's administration as My Lying Ponies : Power Corrupts.
Joe Biden is Pinkie Pie.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 02:53 AM (brJMf)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 02:55 AM (+98Gb)
http://tinyurl.com/q9gr8bv
Posted by: Vic at June 13, 2013 02:55 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Juan de Hattatime at June 13, 2013 02:56 AM (CqZmo)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 02:57 AM (brJMf)
This is because, just when they need the apparatus of power and secrecy the most, their own children will turn on them, just like they taught them to do.
Like many of its forms of art, it auto-destructs. You can't undermine culture, civilization and liberty to such an extent and not get some good old blowback.
This guy, I call him the inevitable American. We're not really a people, we're a nation of laws. The problem then is, if we ignore those laws in spirit and in letter, we abandon the only basis of our legitimacy as an entity.
Our generation seems to take the whole 'liberty/coercion', 'bully/victim' idea very seriously, as it was taught to by the culture.
Posted by: RiverC at June 13, 2013 02:58 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 02:58 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: zsasz at June 13, 2013 02:59 AM (MMC8r)
Legal, Gabe? No. Section 215 of the Patriot Act only allows for gathering of records for specific persons. Secondly, no records can be sought of people pursuing 1st Amendment activities - I believe my personal phone calls fall into that category.
Just because they have judges in their pocket who will "approve" this shit does NOT make it legal.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at June 13, 2013 03:00 AM (UTq/I)
Don't insult Pinkie Pie like that.
Does that make Obama into Spike? Or would that be Jay Carney?
Posted by: RiverC at June 13, 2013 03:00 AM (KTytI)
http://tinyurl.com/o928mdz
Posted by: Vic at June 13, 2013 03:00 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 03:01 AM (brJMf)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 13, 2013 03:01 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 03:01 AM (brJMf)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 03:02 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: T. at June 13, 2013 03:02 AM (+GDxM)
Posted by: spypeach at June 13, 2013 03:02 AM (0n1+D)
"None of the jury candidates who were questioned said it would be a hardship to serve on the panel."
They're already picking out ghostwriters.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ drinking beer at June 13, 2013 03:03 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: perdogg at June 13, 2013 03:04 AM (ziD3M)
This works fine because all Owlalicious says is, 'who?'
Posted by: RiverC at June 13, 2013 03:04 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: RiverC at June 13, 2013 03:06 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at June 13, 2013 03:06 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 03:07 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 03:08 AM (brJMf)
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 13, 2013 03:10 AM (2wg/Q)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 03:11 AM (brJMf)
I've been hearing a bunch of talking heads in the media and the administration justifying all the snooping because it has stopped/prevented/disrupted dozens of terrorist attacks. Of course they won't give some examples. That would let the terrorists know our capabilites.
Since I don't believe a word from this administration I'm doubtful dozens of attacks have been prevented.
Earlier this week some fool was on Fox saying there has not been a successful terrorist attack in this country since 9/11. I guess she never heard of Boston or Hasan, or any of the other attacks by muzzies acting alone.
Posted by: ExSnipe at June 13, 2013 03:12 AM (PBm/l)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 03:12 AM (+98Gb)
But anyone who accepts at face value the work product of either Greenwald or Wyden is at best a fool. Both have proved themselves dishonest and disreputable.
Posted by: Adjoran at June 13, 2013 03:12 AM (473jB)
You like things I don't like, I like things you don't like. I ain't gonna make no deal of it.
Also
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVGI6mhfJyA
Posted by: RiverC at June 13, 2013 03:15 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at June 13, 2013 03:15 AM (a5ljo)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 03:16 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at June 13, 2013 03:17 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: and irresolute at June 13, 2013 03:17 AM (DBH1h)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at June 13, 2013 03:17 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 13, 2013 03:18 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 03:19 AM (brJMf)
So he broke the law and lied under oath to prevent 'speculation.' Got it.
Funny how some people can do that and others can't.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at June 13, 2013 07:17 AM (uhAkr)
It for our own good!!
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at June 13, 2013 03:19 AM (AWmfW)
Posted by: RiverC at June 13, 2013 03:20 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: Otis Criblecoblis at June 13, 2013 03:22 AM (IlZPo)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at June 13, 2013 03:23 AM (JQuNB)
wrong tinyurl?
Viraus2 (the guy who did the video work) also did one using Beastie Boys, which ain't half bad either. He's got a good talent for matching the animation to the vocals.
Posted by: RiverC at June 13, 2013 03:24 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: SAT Rose at June 13, 2013 03:24 AM (ZOPA0)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at June 13, 2013 03:25 AM (xjpRj)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at June 13, 2013 03:25 AM (/znCo)
Posted by: jimmy at June 13, 2013 03:25 AM (7iiiQ)
Posted by: T. at June 13, 2013 03:25 AM (+GDxM)
Posted by: AZ Hi Desert (All my Hate cannot be found) at June 13, 2013 03:26 AM (ial2b)
I was conned also because he said all the right things that appealed to me. Even now I have to catch myself to make sure I'm not being swayed by my image of what I thought he was rather than what his actions prove him to be. I'm not sure what these Repukes' game plan is where they think they can lie to the base and there not be any negative consequences. Maybe strategic geniuses like that turd Rove think they can shit all over us and "where are they gonna go" but that's just as dumb as every other fucking thing he's done that make him a major loser on election day.
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 13, 2013 03:26 AM (2wg/Q)
Posted by: Theo at June 13, 2013 03:26 AM (24Q8U)
Posted by: Name Withheld Upon Request [/i] at June 13, 2013 03:27 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 03:30 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at June 13, 2013 03:30 AM (JDIKC)
We could speculate all day about why there is a shortage of people willing to take good-paying government jobs like that.
Posted by: Miss Marple at June 13, 2013 03:31 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at June 13, 2013 03:31 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: Reginald Denny at June 13, 2013 03:32 AM (WVMUQ)
I saw that one awhile ago. Busted out when I realized how perfect the whole 'twilight campaign' line is.
Posted by: RiverC at June 13, 2013 03:32 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 03:34 AM (brJMf)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 03:35 AM (brJMf)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 03:36 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 03:38 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at June 13, 2013 03:38 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: kreplach at June 13, 2013 03:38 AM (eiJIn)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at June 13, 2013 03:39 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 03:40 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 03:41 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Dale Gribble at June 13, 2013 03:42 AM (xm1Dn)
Sesame Street to teach kids how to cope when Mommy or Daddy goes to prison
The long-running PBS childrenÂ’s education show launched the "Little Children, Big Challenges: Incarceration" educational program earlier this week. Organizers say the campaign is aimed at helping kids aged three to eight...
DailyMail
"One, two, three -- three consecutive life terms for premeditated murder!"
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at June 13, 2013 03:42 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 03:43 AM (+98Gb)
It's the only way because the GOP has apparently adopted the jonsetown strategy for advancing conservatism.
Posted by: kreplach
.................
The Dems have the optics on this in their favor. A million people protesting it are simply labeled "racists".
That's why I agree with many who say the GOP is done.. finis... They are going to lose their base over this in attempting to bring in more Latinos - which they will never get anyway.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at June 13, 2013 03:43 AM (UTq/I)
Sesame Street to teach kids how to cope when Mommy or Daddy goes to prison
Well there are only so many ways to do the 26 letter alphabet and count to 12.
Gotta do something to justify their phony baloney jobs.
Posted by: Reginald Denny at June 13, 2013 03:45 AM (WVMUQ)
Posted by: joncelli at June 13, 2013 03:45 AM (vh67+)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at June 13, 2013 03:45 AM (JQuNB)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 03:46 AM (+98Gb)
Theo,
Maybe in Norway it wasn't a big deal and everything worked out fine, but here in the Land of the Free, and Home of the Brave it hasn't.
There are plenty examples of those with the "wrong" beliefs getting Soviet style treatment.
Posted by: ExSnipe at June 13, 2013 03:47 AM (PBm/l)
Posted by: Dale Gribble at June 13, 2013 07:42 AM (xm1Dn)
It's for the children!
Posted by: NSA at June 13, 2013 03:47 AM (AWmfW)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at June 13, 2013 03:47 AM (JQuNB)
Posted by: zsasz at June 13, 2013 03:47 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at June 13, 2013 03:47 AM (/znCo)
Posted by: NSA and PBS, together at last at June 13, 2013 03:48 AM (vh67+)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 03:49 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at June 13, 2013 07:43 AM (UTq/I)
It's not for the GOP , it's for the political class.
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at June 13, 2013 03:49 AM (AWmfW)
Posted by: kreplach at June 13, 2013 03:49 AM (eiJIn)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 03:49 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Lady in Black at June 13, 2013 03:50 AM (ovWeo)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 03:51 AM (brJMf)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 03:51 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Name Withheld Upon Request [/i] at June 13, 2013 03:53 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 03:53 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 03:53 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: 'Ette in training, a striving wannabe at June 13, 2013 03:54 AM (zvxqj)
The oldest episodes have labels warning parents that they're not suitable for children. They show monsters "modeling bad behavior" by having fun and eating cookies.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ drinking beer at June 13, 2013 03:55 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: Theo at June 13, 2013 03:56 AM (24Q8U)
Looks at Amazon tracking history for Limits of Power. Wonder if I hit up local post office this afternoon I could intercept and snag it tonight. Then lose myself back in Moon's universe.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 03:56 AM (brJMf)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 13, 2013 03:57 AM (E5Yns)
Posted by: Name Withheld Upon Request [/i] at June 13, 2013 03:58 AM (U2UQk)
Gloating because Ace agreed with him for once?
These guys are spilling lots of words, just to tell us this Snowden character is shady.
Thanks boys, we got it. I'm not sure who is arguing with you, but the question you don't seem to be answering is, so what? Are you down with government spying on American citizens or not? Or are you fine with the Obama administration's explanations on all this, because, as we know they have completely and utterly earned our trust in this matter, and in all others.
Posted by: BurtTC at June 13, 2013 03:58 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: mindful webworker waves hi at June 13, 2013 04:01 AM (7KxSm)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 13, 2013 07:57 AM (E5Yns)
And it featured another gutless Repuke, Rick Scott, selling Zimmerman out to the race hustlers instead of letting the system work just like it does for every other citizen. Great conservative values, Rick!
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 13, 2013 04:01 AM (2wg/Q)
Posted by: Theo at June 13, 2013 07:56 AM (24Q8U)
Woooord!!
Posted by: IRS at June 13, 2013 04:01 AM (AWmfW)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 04:02 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: joncelli at June 13, 2013 04:02 AM (vh67+)
Posted by: Jean at June 13, 2013 04:03 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: zsasz at June 13, 2013 04:04 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 13, 2013 08:01 AM (2wg/Q)
It would have been a great moment to reach out to hispanics too.
But he chose to follow the anti freedom policy of Washington DC.
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at June 13, 2013 04:04 AM (AWmfW)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 13, 2013 04:04 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 04:05 AM (brJMf)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 04:06 AM (XIxXP)
http://youtu.be/n9aYrURLHh0
The Brain analyses history in order to conquer the world.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 04:06 AM (brJMf)
Posted by: mindful webworker scratches head, yawns, sips coffee at June 13, 2013 04:07 AM (7KxSm)
Posted by: Name Withheld Upon Request [/i] at June 13, 2013 04:07 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 04:07 AM (aid28)
....It doesn't follow from that that any individual american gets hurt.
Posted by: Theo at June 13, 2013 07:56 AM (24Q8U)
Ha...Ha...Ha.
Thanks. I needed a good laugh this morning.
Posted by: ExSnipe at June 13, 2013 04:07 AM (PBm/l)
Posted by: Marybeth at June 13, 2013 04:08 AM (zFUKI)
We would be far better off directing our ire toward the administration. Snowden the man whether he is a traitor or a hero is Obama's problem, make him deal with it (while taking the opportunity to strip some bark off Barry's ass for incompetence).
BTW, We always wonder how come the government leaks like a sieve when there is a GOP Pres but no one flips on a Dem--I got a pretty good idea why that is.....
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at June 13, 2013 04:08 AM (Nl4r1)
Posted by: RWC at June 13, 2013 04:09 AM (Wl/Ht)
Posted by: arugula monster at June 13, 2013 04:10 AM (7KxSm)
Posted by: zsasz at June 13, 2013 04:10 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 04:11 AM (aid28)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 13, 2013 04:11 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Deanna at June 13, 2013 04:12 AM (KL8DP)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 04:12 AM (brJMf)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 13, 2013 08:11 AM (da5Wo)
Nicely played, sir.
Early threadwinner
Posted by: Marybeth at June 13, 2013 04:13 AM (zFUKI)
By going after a generic anonymous leaker immediately on release of the story about PRISM the government confirmed that the story was true. Furthermore the POTUS - by immediately doing what he did - confirmed that he knew what PRISM was, and that he used it regularly.
It is a violation of federal wiretap laws to intercept private electronic communications without a specific warrant. The Internet is a point to point communications media - if Charlie intercepts an email from Adam meant for Beverly that is a violation. PRISM represents trillions of felony counts of wiretap law violations. It is utterly lawless behavior on a breath taking 1984 level. To ignore it - as the original poster seems to urge us to do is to acquiesce to tyranny of the worst possible sort.
Posted by: [/i] An Observation at June 13, 2013 04:13 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 04:14 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at June 13, 2013 04:15 AM (7ObY1)
In all seriousness, could this be true?
Posted by: Marybeth at June 13, 2013 08:08 AM (zFUKI)
Why not? We are supporting the muzzies that helped spawn Bin Laden and carried out many terrorist attacks.
Wouldn't want to upset our "allies."
Posted by: ExSnipe at June 13, 2013 04:15 AM (PBm/l)
Posted by: NSA at June 13, 2013 04:15 AM (jJA/4)
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at June 13, 2013 04:15 AM (wbmaj)
Finally, an article on PRISM that makes sense, and goes further to the root.
The issue, indeed, appears to be the laws themselves.
Protecting the American People is job #2. Protecting the Constitution is job #1. It wasn't that long ago that people understood this. Schools taught it. Adults discussed it.
If we don't fix this, we're in real trouble...
Posted by: RobM1981 at June 13, 2013 04:16 AM (lV1tZ)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 04:16 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Name Withheld Upon Request [/i] at June 13, 2013 04:16 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at June 13, 2013 04:17 AM (iZ0BY)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 13, 2013 04:18 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Case at June 13, 2013 04:19 AM (o00SF)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 13, 2013 04:19 AM (E5Yns)
This man is willing to sacrifice his own life, liberty and sacred honor for ours.
Kind of reminds me of a particular group of American patriots in the late 18th century.
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at June 13, 2013 08:15 AM (7ObY1)
I think so too. It's not a small thing.
He could have stayed in his cubicle, or sold the stuff to china without telling anyone.
But jealous pundits are reminded of their cowardice and starts to snipe at Snowden.
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at June 13, 2013 04:21 AM (AWmfW)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 04:22 AM (aid28)
Posted by: Law of Self Defense at June 13, 2013 08:17 AM
========================================================
Lots of times people in jury pools say stuff to get out of serving. Don't know if that's the case here but I saw it when I served on a jury in a murder trial.
Posted by: Deanna at June 13, 2013 04:23 AM (KL8DP)
Posted by: [/i][/b]akula_51 at June 13, 2013 04:23 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: A Broken Hearted Ewok at June 13, 2013 04:24 AM (RZwdH)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 04:24 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 04:24 AM (aid28)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 13, 2013 04:24 AM (E5Yns)
Posted by: Brave Sir Robin at June 13, 2013 04:25 AM (qpah5)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at June 13, 2013 04:25 AM (R8hU8)
BlueStateRebel at June 13, 2013 08:15 AM (7ObY1)
Hyperbole much?
Dude worked there for three months, and based on the timeline, it's fair to say he started at BAH for the express purpose of finding documents that fit his predetermined narrative.
He lied about his "special forces" training.
If anything, he's a narcissist poser wannabe. Comparing him to the likes of Hamilton, Jefferson, et al is to insult them.
Posted by: @JohnTant at June 13, 2013 04:25 AM (tVWQB)
The issue, indeed, appears to be the laws themselves.
Protecting the American People is job #2. Protecting the Constitution is job #1. It wasn't that long ago that people understood this. Schools taught it. Adults discussed it.
If we don't fix this, we're in real trouble...
Posted by: RobM1981 at June 13, 2013 08:16 AM (lV1tZ)
There are no laws when judges are chosen to be activists.
Look at David Gregorys gun crimes white wash.
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at June 13, 2013 04:26 AM (AWmfW)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 04:26 AM (XIxXP)
Hyperbole much?
Dude worked there for three months, and based on the timeline, it's fair to say he started at BAH for the express purpose of finding documents that fit his predetermined narrative.
He lied about his "special forces" training.
If anything, he's a narcissist poser wannabe. Comparing him to the likes of Hamilton, Jefferson, et al is to insult them.
Posted by: @JohnTant at June 13, 2013 08:25 AM (tVWQB)
He's been working for NSA at least since 2009.
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at June 13, 2013 04:27 AM (AWmfW)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 04:27 AM (brJMf)
@176 Cream and 10 sugars please, helps me stay observant
Posted by: NSA at June 13, 2013 04:28 AM (jJA/4)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 13, 2013 04:28 AM (E5Yns)
Posted by: waldo at June 13, 2013 04:28 AM (RZwdH)
Why not? We are supporting the muzzies that helped spawn Bin Laden and carried out many terrorist attacks.
Wouldn't want to upset our "allies."
Posted by: ExSnipe at June 13, 2013 08:15 AM (PBm/l)
I know. Our gut tells us it's indeed likely with this regime.
But if someone could get their hands on some concrete proof?
Polls are already indicating that Americans are increasingly disturbed about the privacy invasion.
If churches & synagogues are also exempt from the data collection, then probably not much of a case can be made.
But if they are not exempt?
Big potential for backlash against the man-child and his henchmen.
Posted by: Marybeth at June 13, 2013 04:28 AM (zFUKI)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 08:24 AM (XIxXP)
No .
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at June 13, 2013 04:28 AM (AWmfW)
He's been working for NSA at least since 2009.
Temper Tantrum at June 13, 2013 08:27 AM (AWmfW)
Doing what.....?
Posted by: @JohnTant at June 13, 2013 04:29 AM (tVWQB)
three months, and based on the timeline, it's fair to say he started at
BAH for the express purpose of finding documents that fit his
predetermined narrative.
I Do Not Care. What the government is doing is dangerous at best, and tyrannical at worst.
He lied about his "special forces" training.
I Do Not Care. What the government is doing is dangerous at best, and tyrannical at worst.
If anything, he's a narcissist poser wannabe.
I Do Not Care. What the government is doing is dangerous at best, and tyrannical at worst.
Posted by: GMan at June 13, 2013 04:29 AM (sxq57)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/u][/i] at June 13, 2013 04:29 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 13, 2013 04:30 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 04:30 AM (aid28)
Posted by: waldo at June 13, 2013 04:30 AM (RZwdH)
Posted by: Harrison Bergeron at June 13, 2013 04:30 AM (JQuNB)
Manning gave operational stuff that may have gotten people killed.
Jury's out on Snowden.
Posted by: typo dynamofo at June 13, 2013 04:31 AM (WVMUQ)
June 3-9 is 'Gay Days' this year. So you're gonna miss out on all the fun.
Funny how they hid the actual date in a graphic element, not as an easily searchable text field.
Posted by: Name Withheld Upon Request at June 13, 2013 08:16 AM (U2UQk)
In the late 90s a friend was going to spend a long weekend at Disneyworld with his and several other families. He came to work that Monday still in a rage. That's when we first heard about 'gay days'.
Disney kept it secret then and did not impose any behaviour or dress code limits. The families and their kids were treated horribly. He demanded, and recieved full refunds. He's never been back since.
Posted by: ExSnipe at June 13, 2013 04:31 AM (PBm/l)
Posted by: zsasz at June 13, 2013 04:31 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 04:31 AM (brJMf)
Sweet Lord Almighty. What is with this?
Posted by: RiverC at June 13, 2013 04:32 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: Supreme Overlord John Roberts at June 13, 2013 04:32 AM (MMC8r)
I Do Not Care
GMan at June 13, 2013 08:29 AM (sxq57)
------------
You do not care that this guy is being lionized by someone?
You know, it's entirely possible, probable even, that there are no angels here. I can vilify the guy without losing focus of the ball game here. Lots of people can.
Posted by: @JohnTant at June 13, 2013 04:33 AM (tVWQB)
Even if PRISM is exploiting back doors in routers each warantless intercept is a felony wiretap law violation.
Posted by: [/i] An Observation at June 13, 2013 04:33 AM (ylhEn)
I'm thinking the only realistic positive outcome from this Zimmerman case will be a hung jury and GZ's midnight flight out of this country. There's no other way he lives long enough to see another birthday whether he's convicted or not.
The cities will burn regardless. Innocent people will die at the hands of thugs. Nothing will be done. We will sit there on our fat asses and rot.
I absolutely hate what this nation has become.
Posted by: Jaws at June 13, 2013 04:34 AM (4I3Uo)
You know, it's entirely possible, probable even, that there are no angels here. I can vilify the guy without losing focus of the ball game here. Lots of people can.
Nope, I don't care one bit about Snowden. I do not care WHO leaked this stuff. I do not care what kind of person they are, why they did it, what they had for lunch, how much money they make or anything else about them. What I DO care about is that the government is spying on all of us.
Posted by: GMan at June 13, 2013 04:34 AM (sxq57)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 04:35 AM (XIxXP)
They are truly nuts... I might pay 25 but instead of going to see 1 or 2 movies a month I'll see one or 2 a year. ..
Posted by: ET at June 13, 2013 04:35 AM (YpjaN)
Posted by: occam at June 13, 2013 04:36 AM (XrIHk)
Funny how they hid the actual date in a graphic element, not as an easily searchable text field.
Posted by: Name Withheld Upon Request at June 13, 2013 08:16 AM (U2UQk)
"Hey mommy look over there, that guy has a sign above his head that says he is a human urinal, what does that mean?"
Posted by: Samuel Adams at June 13, 2013 04:36 AM (cK0tU)
5 It's a good day to do Quaternions.
Posted by: RiverC at June 13, 2013 06:39 AM (KTytI)
What are you using quaternions for? A matrix is always faster...
Posted by: McStool at June 13, 2013 04:36 AM (rxnpE)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 04:36 AM (brJMf)
You either don't read enough or you're a circus clown in disguise.
The NSA knows what Snowden has in his possession. They track access, printing and just about anything done on their systems better than anyone.
The NSA is in the process of briefing Congress on what Snowden has to eliminate the surprise factor. Suffice to say the most common word used to describe these revelations is "stunning".
First, I hope we are able to mitigate whatever damage this traitor is doing- because to me it seems like quite a bit. Second, he's in Chinese territory and revealing the extent of our ops against the Chinese. I can think of fewer actions more traitorous or damaging. He is providing avenues and keys for our enemies to investigate potential access/sources and mitigate any intelligence value. In the process, both he and Greenwald are putting us all at risk for increased danger. That's not speculation it's fact.
Personally, I hope he hangs on a rope for what he's done.
As to the legal and Fourth Amendment issues, we will obviously get to that. But there were other ways to litigate Snowden's concerns beside revealing to our enemies the extent of our intelligence operations. I am certainly uncomfortable, if proven true, with the scope and extent of this data gathering on Americans. If found to be true and unconstitutional the perpetrators should spend the rest of their lives in prison. But that is separate and distinct from Snowden's means of revealing this and the apparatus supporting his disclosure.
Posted by: Marcus at June 13, 2013 04:37 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 13, 2013 04:37 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: rip van winkin at the 80s at June 13, 2013 04:37 AM (WVMUQ)
Nope, I don't care one bit about Snowden. I do not care WHO leaked this stuff. I do not care what kind of person they are, why they did it, what they had for lunch, how much money they make or anything else about them. What I DO care about is that the government is spying on all of us.
GMan at June 13, 2013 08:34 AM (sxq57)
----------------
Well, since I made my comment in response to someone who likened him to the Framers, I'm not sure how where you're coming from is relevant to what I had written.
Posted by: @JohnTant at June 13, 2013 04:38 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 08:35 AM (XIxXP)
Both eat food! They're the same!
Posted by: Temper Tantrum at June 13, 2013 04:38 AM (AWmfW)
Posted by: GMan at June 13, 2013 08:34 AM (sxq57)
Call me dense but - although I don't think Snowden is an angel, I still do NOT understand what this guy has leaked, other than the process by which the government is spying on everyone in this country.
Terrorists are not the brightest bulbs in the lamppost, but I think they'd be able to figure that much out.
Posted by: Marybeth at June 13, 2013 04:38 AM (zFUKI)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 13, 2013 04:39 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 04:39 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: phoenixgirl@phxazgrl..back home at June 13, 2013 04:39 AM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: waldo at June 13, 2013 04:39 AM (RZwdH)
Are you an idiot? I didn't think so...but now, not so sure. I'm amazed at the apologists is all.
Posted by: GMan at June 13, 2013 04:39 AM (sxq57)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 04:40 AM (aid28)
Posted by: buzzion at June 13, 2013 04:40 AM (LI48c)
Posted by: zsasz at June 13, 2013 04:40 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 13, 2013 04:40 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 04:41 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 04:41 AM (brJMf)
Snowden aside- If the secret you must keep is wholesale raping of the Constitutional rights of your fellows you have already violated an oath.
Posted by: rip van winkin at the 80s at June 13, 2013 04:42 AM (WVMUQ)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 13, 2013 04:42 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Beto at June 13, 2013 04:42 AM (VWfCN)
Bourbon for breakfast?
Snowden should be held responsible for his actions. Why can't we also be thankful that what he exposed is important?
Two competing ideas! It's difficult, but manageable with some effort.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at June 13, 2013 04:42 AM (WW8xK)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 04:43 AM (aid28)
Ugh, USD to JPY exchange rate is horrible. $1USD gets just 94Yen.
-------------
Wow. I haven't looked in several years, but that's just shameful.
Posted by: @JohnTant at June 13, 2013 04:43 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at June 13, 2013 04:44 AM (659DL)
Posted by: occam at June 13, 2013 04:44 AM (XrIHk)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 13, 2013 04:45 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 04:45 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 04:45 AM (aid28)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 13, 2013 04:45 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at June 13, 2013 04:46 AM (pT3XC)
Is it? Because the NSA spying tails into the meta-wrong here, of government turning its powers on domestic citizens, and accruing new powers to abuse.
My worst fear is Ace is trying to protect against the culpability of our own, and for that reason trying to frame the spying as kinda ok and ought to be taken as kinda ok, because everyone will take it as kinda ok...lets get back to things that are bad and more directly the other guy's (TFG's machines) fault....
Here's what - I think it perfectly plausible that Snowden is not the lone gunman on the story, that someone might have rolled him out as a kind of trap. The thing is, he could be fake and his story made of squirrels moths and ulterior motives and it doesn't matter. If he were perfectly unimpeachable it also wouldn't matter because we still wouldn't know what is going on - scope, capabilities, targets, future plans.
The thing is, if any Republicans are conniving with the Utah facility or Bush did more than he admitted it isn't important. What's important is to stop any general warrant -type spying on the domestic population. Know about, stop, forestall, prevent - to draw the line.
Posted by: SarahW at June 13, 2013 04:46 AM (LYwCh)
Should be interesting times.
Posted by: rip van winkin at the 80s at June 13, 2013 04:46 AM (WVMUQ)
Posted by: Samuel Adams at June 13, 2013 04:46 AM (cK0tU)
127 I see that the postal service accepts 867-5309 and JohnDoe@ as valid phone number and email addresses. Though I probably just committed my first felony of the day.
Before 8:00 a.m. -- a new record.....................................
Just make sure to remember when they call to answer with "Hello this is Jenny"
Posted by: Molly k. at June 13, 2013 04:46 AM (WgeYS)
Posted by: SarahW at June 13, 2013 04:46 AM (LYwCh)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 07:38 AM (XIxXP)
retweeted! lol!
Posted by: and irresolute at June 13, 2013 04:46 AM (DBH1h)
Gabe seems to think because judges have arrogated to themselves the power to shitcan the Constitution that this somehow constitutes legality. It does not. It just proves our government is no longer a legitimate entity operating within the confines of its foundational documents. When you reach that point it is EVERY decent person's duty to stand up and put an end to it. That the courts conspired with our legislators to violate our rights does not give their actions any more legitimacy. I don't care if Snowden is a Chinese agent, or if he did it for money or attention. I am going to be pissed at the party who has denied me my rights, not the person who informed me of those violations.
WTF do we even need a Constitution for other than as a handy substitute for toilet paper if we let our government get away with shit like this?
Posted by: Thatch at June 13, 2013 04:46 AM (qYvEa)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 04:48 AM (aid28)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at June 13, 2013 04:48 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 13, 2013 04:48 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 13, 2013 04:48 AM (brJMf)
Posted by: Name Withheld Upon Request [/i] at June 13, 2013 04:49 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: [/i][/b]akula_51 at June 13, 2013 04:49 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 04:49 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 13, 2013 04:49 AM (da5Wo)
Sooooo any idea why PRISM didn't catch Snowden?
------------
Because he's just like James Madison, and shut up, and what, you approve of the government spying on us!?!?!?!11!/?
/s
Posted by: @JohnTant at June 13, 2013 04:50 AM (tVWQB)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 13, 2013 08:45 AM (da5Wo)
Sure they are blueboy. Snowden exposed (or may have exposed) government malfeasance and overreach. He did this by breaking the law.
He should be made to suffer the consequences of his actions. Trial by jury would be nice. If they think what he did was deserving of punishment? Great. If not? Great.
Shortness of breath is not a good thing. Put your name on the list to see a physician. I think that you belong on list 6B: white professional males. That should get you an appointment sometime in December.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at June 13, 2013 04:50 AM (WW8xK)
...and the Cochran family business legacy collapses in a single day!
Posted by: EC at June 13, 2013 04:50 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Master of Minutia at June 13, 2013 04:51 AM (5SlKF)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 08:26 AM (XIxXP)
Or to be insulted with a pile of garbage that nobody in their right mind would inflict upon themselves. There have been trailers for Grown Ups 2 all over tv recently and, assuming they only show the best scenes to generate interest, there is nothing in it that isn't blatantly obvious and unfunny. The only more misleading title would be Good Script; although an honest title would be Waste of Time and Money.
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 13, 2013 04:51 AM (2wg/Q)
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at June 13, 2013 04:51 AM (X4HxX)
Posted by: [/i][/b]akula_51 at June 13, 2013 04:52 AM (Vgn84)
Rotating models, of course. Now, I convert it to a matrix before sending it to the GPU, but still; smaller footprint.
Posted by: RiverC at June 13, 2013 04:52 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at June 13, 2013 04:52 AM (X4HxX)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at June 13, 2013 04:52 AM (7ObY1)
"By the way; it is informative to remember, for the coming riots, that the bastard that broke Reginald Denny's skull in 91 places and sentenced him to a lifetime of trouble with walking and speaking did only 4 years in prison.
Should be interesting times."
Define "interesting".
Oh God, oh God, we're all gonna die?
Posted by: Hoban Washburn at June 13, 2013 04:53 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 04:53 AM (aid28)
Showing off my brand-new shiny knowledge, courtesy of Mark Levin:
Doesn't this whole data collection scandal remind you of the Writs of Assistance - which was one of the grievances of the American colonists against British soldiers?
They had a general warrant, too.
Which is why we now have a 4th Amendment.
I'm just a lowly CPA, not fluent in legalese, double-speak and nuance, but it seems pretty clear - at least to me - that the government is overstepping its bounds here.
Posted by: Marybeth at June 13, 2013 04:53 AM (zFUKI)
Posted by: Name Withheld Upon Request [/i] at June 13, 2013 04:54 AM (U2UQk)
IIRC didn't Denny even forgive him in front of some cameras?
Posted by: Samuel Adams at June 13, 2013 04:54 AM (cK0tU)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 13, 2013 04:55 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: akula_51 at June 13, 2013 08:49 AM (Vgn84)
Agreed. And he should be held accountable. But he is much less important than the malfeasance he exposed.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at June 13, 2013 04:55 AM (WW8xK)
"Should be interesting times"
Interesting times call for a holtered pistol, a couple spare mags, and your favorite flavor of rifle tucked behind the truck seat.
Posted by: Jaws at June 13, 2013 04:55 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at June 13, 2013 04:55 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 04:56 AM (aid28)
http://tinyurl.com/ mnbjswp
Remember when gay marriage advocates still pretended that they weren't interested in legalizing polygamy.
By the way, I love that this appears in Slate's feminist blog. Because polygamous societies throughout history have been so good for women.
Posted by: Colorado Alex at June 13, 2013 04:57 AM (lr3d7)
Posted by: phoenixgirl@phxazgrl..back home at June 13, 2013 04:58 AM (8JJ6O)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at June 13, 2013 08:55 AM (da5Wo)
Yes. The part where Snowden is judged by a jury of his peers would cover that part.
We, the people need to do the "holding the government accountable" part.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at June 13, 2013 04:58 AM (WW8xK)
And I guess whoever blew the whistle on the IRS should have just kept his bitch mouth shut, too.
And I guess whoever blew the whistle at the EPA should have shut up, too.
And those Border Patrol agents who go public with the DHS's neglect of the border, they're traitors.
Now, let's just hope everybody who knows what really happened at Benghazi keeps their mouths shut.
After all, how can The State operate efficiently if people are constantly mouthing off about its activities?
/sarc
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 13, 2013 04:58 AM (QXlbZ)
And why wouldn't major Obama supporters hand over this information willingly? It's in their best interest to do so. It makes them eligible for all kinds of 'taxpayer funded opportunities' that are just not available to political opponents.
Have we only see a search warrant for Verizon because it was all that was necessary? Were the other service providers willing participants who only thought that the information they provided to the Obama team would be used to reelect their favorite sugar-daddy?
Posted by: gastorgrab at June 13, 2013 04:58 AM (FX38i)
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at June 13, 2013 04:58 AM (X4HxX)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 13, 2013 05:00 AM (E5Yns)
In short, a country is either a people or a law, or both. We were never a people except locally, (we destroyed that for Mammon and Safety) And so long as we returned to our law and took it seriously even though we bent it like crazy, we still remained a real entity.
Snowden is just following the logic: If America doesn't honor liberty, what is it other than a collusion of deceptions made to force compliance to a particular group of power holders? It's not a people, so there's no loyalty to blood, and it's then no longer a law since its law is ONLY made legitimate on the concept of Life, Liberty and Property (Pursuit of Happiness)
People forget the problem with the South's slavery idea was that it didn't groove with our general law; you can't say all people are equal in that they cannot be denied life, liberty and pursuit of happiness and then take over half your population and do just that. It was bound to fail eventually because of the cognitive dissonance.
Without a blood, a people, you can't survive a contradiction of law.
He just woke up from the delusion and decided to become an outlaw.
Posted by: RiverC at June 13, 2013 05:00 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 05:00 AM (aid28)
Everyone who argues like this is ignoring the oath to preserve and protect the Constitution which Snowden, as a trusted contract employee of the Federal government, had to take before he ever got a security clearance. How do you resolve a conflict between those two oaths? Are you comfortable with people violating that first oath so they can obey their secrecy oath? If the general answer is "yes" then there is no constitution to preserve and protect with those secrets and we have become the Soviet Union.
..."if proven true"... Of course the charges are true; the feds admitted they were true when they started the search to find who leaked them. If the charges weren't true the feds wouldn't have known what the guy was talking about and would have placed him in the ring of kooks who think people from mars are tapping our brains.
Posted by: [/i] An Observation at June 13, 2013 05:00 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: David, infamous sockpuppet[/i][/u][/b][/s] at June 13, 2013 05:00 AM (jvdNh)
Posted by: Waldo at June 13, 2013 05:01 AM (RZwdH)
on Wednesday/ I hope that we have a good turnout.
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 13, 2013 09:00 AM (E5Yns)
Is this only in DC?
Posted by: Marybeth at June 13, 2013 05:01 AM (zFUKI)
For the last time, I do not fucking care how long he worked there. I do not fucking care how much money he made, what his education was like, or what videos his girlfriend made. I do not fucking care if he has a mole on his neck, I do not fucking care about any of these fucking DISTRACTIONS.
He has offered up his very life for his country. Hyperbole? Do you have any fucking idea what the Founders faced? Hanging by the neck until they were dead. Tell me again about hyperbole.
The majority of Americans agree with me, and it crosses all political boundries.
But you just go ahead supporting Obama's Big Brother nation.
BlueStateRebel at June 13, 2013 08:52 AM (7ObY1)
------------------
I see. So you liken a lying hipster to the Framers and that means I'm supporting a Big Brother nation?
Since you keep applauding him for giving up "a cushy job, life in Hawaii, his family, his friends, his girlfriend" you obviously do care about how long he worked there, how much money he made, what videos his girlfriend made, etc., since you mentioned it all as a way to lionize him.
Say what you will, but I do know one thing...when those great fellows signed the Declaration of Independence, they didn't run to fucking China immediately afterward.
Posted by: @JohnTant at June 13, 2013 05:01 AM (tVWQB)
The Arizona House passed the Medicaid expansion bill.
Posted by: Deanna at June 13, 2013 05:01 AM (KL8DP)
Posted by: and irresolute at June 13, 2013 05:02 AM (DBH1h)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 05:03 AM (aid28)
Posted by: phunctor at June 13, 2013 05:04 AM (ifs2t)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 13, 2013 05:06 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 05:07 AM (aid28)
Posted by: phunctor at June 13, 2013 05:07 AM (ifs2t)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 05:10 AM (aid28)
Posted by: Deanna at June 13, 2013 09:01 AM (KL8DP)
Just like Ohio and Florida did; in all cases with 'conservative" governors who can't seem to understand that expanding the state's reach is *not* a good thing to do. They're about as "conservative" as that glorified bean counter Voinovich was.
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 13, 2013 05:10 AM (2wg/Q)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 05:14 AM (aid28)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 13, 2013 05:16 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: Baldy at June 13, 2013 05:18 AM (tyDFN)
Posted by: [/i][/b]akula_51 at June 13, 2013 05:19 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 13, 2013 05:19 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 13, 2013 05:19 AM (E5Yns)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 13, 2013 05:21 AM (E5Yns)
You know what would be helpful right now?
Considering all the scandals and other things plaguing the Obama administration, it would be great if social conservatives made a big push against abortion and started a discussion about the definition of rape.
Just so we have something else to talk about.
Posted by: jwest at June 13, 2013 05:21 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 05:23 AM (aid28)
Posted by: [/i][/b]akula_51 at June 13, 2013 05:24 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 13, 2013 05:27 AM (E5Yns)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 05:27 AM (aid28)
OK, everyone with their hands up go drown yourselves.
There are marketing and metadata firms fully devoted to building a profile on you based on all that information- which is publicly available.
Every wonder why you get these targeted emails for products you would probably buy? How about messages from social network sites to connect with someone where you stop and think WTF- how did they make that connection?
It's already being legally done and yo thought the NSA would just...skip that?
LMFAO
Posted by: Marcus at June 13, 2013 05:28 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: [/i][/b]akula_51 at June 13, 2013 05:29 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: Esteban 10077 at June 13, 2013 05:31 AM (aid28)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 13, 2013 05:32 AM (E5Yns)
Nope; I don't think anybody is saying that.
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 13, 2013 09:21 AM (E5Yns)
NGU is...
"Let every freaken individual in the Military and the Intel Community decide ON THEIR OWN when to violated any and all secrecy oaths and laws. Yeah that will work out great."
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 13, 2013 05:33 AM (QXlbZ)
There are procedures for investigating unethical behavior. If you choose not to follow those procedures, resign.
Posted by: Fritz at June 13, 2013 05:34 AM (UzPAd)
'Sup Horde,
I'll be in an our today as I'm trying to clean my deck in anticipation of staining it this weekend (if it ever stops raining here.)
Posted by: tsrblke at June 13, 2013 05:37 AM (GaqMa)
The legal whistle-blowing mechanism is to report violations to law enforcement personnel only. Not judges, district attorneys, senators, or a congressman - all of whom would be illegal to contact.
That legal method is correct and suffices for cases of normal import - a supervisor orders you and others to steal government property for him.
However in this case because the entire chain of command - up to and including the POTUS was part of the illegal conspiracy - there are no legal whistle-blowing paths. A whistle not heard by the public is a whistle not blown.
The argument about whether such a public whistle-blower is a traitor or a patriot will be determined by whether or not the Constitution means anything.
If it does and the people involved in the conspiracy to violate it are convicted and sentenced a public whistle-blower can be a patriot.
If the Constitution means nothing there is no country against whom treason has been committed - since the Constitution is the sole authorizing document for the existence of this country. Either way it is difficult to see a Public whistle-blower falling in the 'traitor' category.
Sorry your State Uber Alles argument is one Stalin might have approved - but as for me, not so much.
Posted by: [/i] An Observation at June 13, 2013 05:37 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: [/i][/b]akula_51 at June 13, 2013 05:39 AM (Vgn84)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 13, 2013 05:40 AM (E5Yns)
Posted by: Ed Anger at June 13, 2013 05:41 AM (tOkJB)
And what do you do when the people committing the crimes are in charge of the people investigating the crimes?
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 13, 2013 05:42 AM (QXlbZ)
By resigning you are violating your over-ridding fundamental oath to Preserve and Protect the Constitution of the United States against all enemies foreign and domestic - which federal contract employees have to take as part of the "Trusted employee of the Federal Government" program.
The legal procedures assume that at some point in the chain of command the corruption stops - when the entire chain is corrupt those legal procedures fail and an extra-legal procedure is the only one available.
Posted by: [/i] An Observation at June 13, 2013 05:59 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel at June 13, 2013 06:12 AM (klGLB)
Posted by: occam at June 13, 2013 08:44 AM (XrIHk)
-------------
It's not about catching Snowden (or the bombers of Boston) before he does the deed, it's about *catching up to* the guy(s) what done the deed and *their associates*, after the fact.
Think back to Sept12th, 2001. We knew who they were the same day(!), within hours, and within days the feds detained or interviewed everyone associated with them. There was a reported comment said to be from some holy warrior who said (more or less) we had more attacks planned but didn't think you could react so quickly.
Posted by: Skandia Recluse at June 13, 2013 06:27 AM (lKm28)
A few years down the line when someone in a democrat administration orders a mid-level employee to order the automatic IRS audits of all taxpayers who are known to own guns, I sure hope it is Snowden that is the mid-level employee, at least I know that he won't follow the illegal orders given to him.
Oh wait, this just in from the establishment...we must prosecute and hang him and give everyone in the administration a pass on their crimes.
Posted by: doug at June 13, 2013 06:48 AM (uJ8q7)
Posted by: Judgment at June 13, 2013 07:25 AM (t0N5a)
Posted by: gekkobear at June 13, 2013 08:42 AM (nYHRn)
Posted by: Bets at June 13, 2013 02:49 PM (tDvvM)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3249 seconds, 461 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: zeera at June 13, 2013 02:31 AM (3dXwx)