June 17, 2013
— Gabriel Malor Happy Monday.
Can we call Ed Snowden a traitorous crapweasel now? In addition to confirming some of our programs against the Chinese, he spilled the beans on specific operations targeting Russia.
BenK was appropriately skeptical of CNET's report (that was stealth-edited on Sunday, two days after initial publication) on Rep. Nadler's hearsay that he was informed (by Unnamed Official) that NSA listened to the content of phone calls at any analyst's whim. That report has been denied by NSA and walked-back by Nadler.
Some of the companies involved with PRISM have released statistics on their involvement providing governments with information.
There was a punchy op-ed in the NYTimes over the weekend disputing claims that the U.S. has fallen behind Europe in broadband internet tech.
"For the first time in Obama's presidency, half of the public says they don't believe he is honest and trustworthy." His approval rating fell 8 points in the past month to 45%. "The drop in Obama's support is fueled by a dramatic 17-point decline over the past month among people under 30."
Speaker Boehner says he won't bring an immigration bill to the floor if it doesn't have majority support from Republicans.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
02:49 AM
| Comments (288)
Post contains 204 words, total size 2 kb.
http://tinyurl.com/m9ajvpc
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 02:50 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 02:50 AM (+98Gb)
http://tinyurl.com/kf945pz
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 02:51 AM (lZvxr)
http://tinyurl.com/khzus2d
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 02:51 AM (lZvxr)
Who is this “top GOP Senator”? why its RINO Graham the top asshole in the GOP (although McShitty gives him a good run). And piss on him and Ratshit Rubio. But yes, I know Fox has always been in the amnesty corner. And here’s some news for you Gramnesty, you are one of the main causes of the “Party’s Death Spiral”.
http://tinyurl.com/ltnhbl6
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 02:51 AM (lZvxr)
http://tinyurl.com/k2jgbm6
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 02:51 AM (lZvxr)
http://tinyurl.com/l72aw3l
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 02:52 AM (lZvxr)
http://tinyurl.com/mrpzw4x
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 02:52 AM (lZvxr)
Ace really needs to reign you and your smarmy attitude on this one in, lest it cost him page views.
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at June 17, 2013 02:52 AM (QBQcg)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 02:52 AM (+98Gb)
http://tinyurl.com/mtk7nyq
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 02:53 AM (lZvxr)
http://tinyurl.com/l25noot
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 02:53 AM (lZvxr)
http://tinyurl.com/mq5lrqy
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 02:53 AM (lZvxr)
http://tinyurl.com/lavxfvk
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 02:54 AM (lZvxr)
http://tinyurl.com/my8y6j7
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 02:54 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Golfman in NC at June 17, 2013 02:54 AM (ZjVkA)
http://tinyurl.com/kud5vq3
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 02:54 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 02:55 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 02:57 AM (+98Gb)
http://tinyurl.com/l25noot
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 06:53 AM (lZvxr)
We already know that most politicians are full of chicken shit.
Posted by: Killerdog at June 17, 2013 02:59 AM (Oi60j)
The Party of stupid is trying very hard to become extinct.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 02:59 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Golfman in NC at June 17, 2013 03:01 AM (ZjVkA)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at June 17, 2013 03:01 AM (jZUEZ)
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at June 17, 2013 07:01 AM (jZUEZ)
Yes he did, about 2 or 3 weeks ago.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 03:02 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 03:04 AM (+98Gb)
"We will have a bill on OBama's desk before the end of the year. Prior to that he was backing Ratshit Rubio's bill. Probably still is
http://tinyurl.com/mfg6ucr
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 03:04 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 03:05 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 03:07 AM (+98Gb)
Is it not possible that the guy IS a traitor but was cagey enough to drop the "spying on citizens" info first? For example, if he had come out leading with the news that we spied on the Russians and the Chinese, wouldn't everyone here have said "GOOD" and immediately judged him a turncoat?
Instead, he comes out with a bit of information that gets all sides up in arms (and with no real proof as we usually require) and after everyone has decided he is a hero he starts dropping this other stuff.
I sit here and see that Cheney thinks he is a traitor, as do several other people I respect. On the other hand, Sensenbrenner, who wrote the original Patriot Bill, says they would never have known about this if he hadn't come forward.
Since I have no reason to disbelieve either Sensenbrenner or Cheney, I am faced with a conundrum.
Posted by: Miss Marple at June 17, 2013 03:07 AM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Golfman in NC at June 17, 2013 03:07 AM (ZjVkA)
It is a total sell-out. Tar it, feather it, burn-scatter-salt...
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 07:07 AM (+98Gb)
I think he will still go with Rubio's POS. It already has the fig leaf that everyone has looked at and says it is a lie.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 03:09 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 03:09 AM (+98Gb)
Ace really needs to reign you and your smarmy attitude on this one in, lest it cost him page views.
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at June 17, 2013 06:52 AM (QBQcg)
----------
I do appreciate bringing to my attention that the NSA is looking at all communications in the U.S. as I thought the Patriot Act only authorized interception of calls that initiated overseas. So yeah, the government needs to be reigned in. But if Snowden is spilling his guts to the Chinese or the Russians, he's a traitor to the U.S. pure and simple
Posted by: Darth Randall at June 17, 2013 03:10 AM (lxc0s)
It must be nice for Rubio to now be an ally of Obama.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 03:10 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 03:11 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 03:12 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 03:13 AM (+98Gb)
Morning, Horde.
This year marks the centenary of the birth of “The Gentle Man of Horror,” Peter Cushing. The magazine Fortean Times – an excellent periodical, by the way, for anyone interested in the weird, bizarre or outré – has a lovely appreciation of him, as well as an extract from screenwriter Steven Volk’s new novella Whitstable.*
So here’s a short Cushing story: in 1957, making his debut as Baron Frankenstein in The Curse of Frankenstein, he got into a conversation with co-star and dear friend Christopher Lee, who was playing the homonymous monster. Lee complained that he didn’t have any lines in the movie, to which Cushing responded, “Consider yourself lucky, dear boy. Have you read the script?”
Hope you all have a wonderful week.
*The story takes place in 1971, just after the death of CushingÂ’s beloved wife Helen. While walking along the beach near his home in Whitstable, a boy comes up to him who thinks he really is Van Helsing, and the boy says his stepfather is a vampire. Of course, he isnÂ’t, but that makes the horror Cushing must face all the more terrifying.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at June 17, 2013 03:14 AM (zF6Iw)
http://tinyurl.com/l72aw3l
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 06:52 AM (lZvxr)
They're doing it wrong!
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at June 17, 2013 03:15 AM (MnSla)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at June 17, 2013 03:15 AM (qyfb5)
Posted by: vae victus at June 17, 2013 03:16 AM (cpMdE)
Posted by: Dale Gribble at June 17, 2013 03:16 AM (89ILT)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ drinking beer at June 17, 2013 03:18 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 03:18 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at June 17, 2013 03:19 AM (xjpRj)
Yet another stupid trend to look out for parents, teens smoking alcohol.
http://tinyurl.com/l72aw3l
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 06:52 AM (lZvxr)
They're doing it wrong!
Posted by: Joethefatman
Word!
Posted by: Butt Chuggers at June 17, 2013 03:19 AM (NF2Bf)
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 03:20 AM (lZvxr)
That Snowden has proved to be a traitor doesn't mean NSA hasn't been raping the Constitution.
Posted by: rip van winkin at the 80s at June 17, 2013 03:20 AM (WVMUQ)
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 03:22 AM (lZvxr)
39 Every piece of shit government official in this country should be brought up on charges.When the fuck are you people going to realise our governmnt IS the enemy,just as much(if not more because they live right next door)as the Chinese,Russians etc;,etc;
Have you not been paying attention to what they are doing to our country the last 50 years or so?
Posted by: vae victus at June 17, 2013 03:22 AM (cpMdE)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 03:22 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 07:13 AM (+98Gb)
-------
I agree. I just felt that grizzled gym coach was being a little harsh on Gabe.
Posted by: Darth Randall at June 17, 2013 03:22 AM (lxc0s)
The worm has turned though... and a lot of us just do not trust the Feds... period. I wish Snowboy would shut his trap about hacking China, but I think that can be because he is a traitor with intent, or just young and making statements that will engender him to his hosts. Who knows, but at what point does "statements" he makes are no longer verifiable but pure propaganda for China or they'll turn him over or snuff him.
Interesting times you guys...
Posted by: Yip at June 17, 2013 03:24 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at June 17, 2013 03:25 AM (+/zXs)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 03:25 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Vodka-soaked tampon at June 17, 2013 03:26 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: RWC at June 17, 2013 03:26 AM (kOa+e)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 17, 2013 03:26 AM (hO8IJ)
Get your torches ready
Posted by: Yip at June 17, 2013 03:27 AM (/jHWN)
http://preview.tinyurl.com/mt4wlpr
Why the next thing the media will be reporting is that Putin is doing it also? Where does it end?
It is *shocking news*, disappointing, stunning, because, you know, governments have never spied on other governments before this. (heavy, heavy sarcasm)
Meanwhile, Sensenbrenner says "While I believe the Patriot Act appropriately balanced national security concerns and civil rights, I have always worried about potential abuses," http://preview.tinyurl.com/meg7z7c
Posted by: Skandia Recluse at June 17, 2013 03:28 AM (WPR6E)
”Everybody’s body has an inherit ability to get rid of alcohol, and most of it, when you inhale it in, is not inhaled back out.”
Inhaled back out? Really?
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at June 17, 2013 03:28 AM (MnSla)
That is a fair criticism. I'm just sick of the one-sidedness and the attitude. I'm sick of being spoken down to like I'm an idiot.
Individuals can't be traitors to the country, they can only be traitors to the Constitution. If the government operates outside the Constitution, any and all information revealed about it cannot, and should not be viewed as traitorous.
Posted by: Old grizzled gym coach at June 17, 2013 03:28 AM (QBQcg)
Posted by: Cretin, a high-grade moron at June 17, 2013 03:28 AM (kymV0)
Oh?
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at June 17, 2013 07:01 AM (jZUEZ)
This is the problem: Boehner sends out mixed signals. It seemed from what Vic quoted that he was determined to reach an agreement with the Senate and JEF on this, maybe to keep the donks from badmouthing the GOP next year as "obstructionist" which is complete horseshit imo, both as a strategy or being truthful. Now Gabe runs an article that indicates otherwise although it's mainly based on second hand information. I called Boehner's office last week to complain about his seeming support for immigration reform that the JEF could live with as a priority when the shit is hitting the fan on so many other things. He creates his own problems by being so wishy washy on every fucking thing.
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 17, 2013 03:28 AM (0qYx9)
Posted by: Cretin, a high-grade moron at June 17, 2013 03:29 AM (kymV0)
Posted by: Gem at June 17, 2013 03:30 AM (zw+pb)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 03:30 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Darth Randall
.............
He's a whistleblower with no place to go. His country has branded him a traitor and enemy of the state. Maybe that's so.. but he's still a whistleblower who should have been afforded some protection for revealing how the NSA and the Obama administration are fucking us over.
The dude's between a rock and a hard place.. by his own choosing, yes. But this country has not been very obliging to whistleblowers in the past - despite laws that are supposed to protect them.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at June 17, 2013 03:30 AM (UTq/I)
The NSA doesn't need to be data mining and archiving every Americans communications to do their job, that's just bullshit and a copout for polititians and pundits to spew. I don't know how anyone can believe a word any of the alphabetic agencies say. I don't give a fuck about about Snowden, but I sure as fuck ain't giving the NSA the benefit of the doubt like Gabe is rushing to do.
Posted by: lowandslow at June 17, 2013 03:30 AM (Fz2C7)
Posted by: Skandia Recluse at June 17, 2013 07:28 AM (WPR6E)
Then Sensenbrenner shouldn't have written the damn thing.
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at June 17, 2013 03:31 AM (MnSla)
My theory of the government people called to testify before various House hearings and giving the 'I know nothing' answers. They are suffering from a syndrome*.
*syndrome-A predictable, characteristic pattern of behavior, action, etc., that tends to occur under certain circumstances.
I have named this syndrome the Sergeant Schultz Syndrome or SSS.
This syndrome seems to have originated in the Washington D.C. area and severely infected government workers. I believe the Centers for Disease Control should send a team to Washington and trace the origin of this syndrome down. But Washington is a big place. Where should the CDC start? Well, these various government employees do seem to have one common denominator-The White House.
Posted by: Case at June 17, 2013 03:32 AM (o00SF)
But But the proctologist who found it there got a speeding ticket on the first of may!
Posted by: rip van winkin at the 80s at June 17, 2013 03:32 AM (WVMUQ)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 03:32 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Killerdog at June 17, 2013 03:33 AM (Oi60j)
Posted by: Fourth Virginia at June 17, 2013 03:35 AM (wbmaj)
Posted by: RWC at June 17, 2013 03:36 AM (qOwz1)
Posted by: Icedog at June 17, 2013 03:36 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 17, 2013 03:38 AM (0qYx9)
Posted by: Icedog at June 17, 2013 07:36 AM (9ScGj)
I don't think so. I believe that is the same case that has been going for a month.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 03:38 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: Icedog at June 17, 2013 03:39 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: ProfShadow at June 17, 2013 03:39 AM (zlecm)
Can't they both be traitors? .... though with the mystery girlfriend's possible mystery hong kong connection, he could just be a half-witting ronulan dupe.
Posted by: f2000 at June 17, 2013 03:40 AM (abiX9)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 03:41 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 03:42 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Icedog at June 17, 2013 03:43 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 03:46 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at June 17, 2013 03:46 AM (+/zXs)
Posted by: Michael Wilbon at June 17, 2013 03:46 AM (Aif/5)
No, JJ. Treason is treason, and must be punished no matter who is responsible.
That's why I advocate adjoining cells for Snowden and Choom Boy.
In fact, we may have to build a new prison just for President Historic First©, his co-conspirators, members of Congress who have repeatedly violated their oaths of office and Snowden. New jobs!
Posted by: MrScribbler at June 17, 2013 03:47 AM (lNAFm)
For those who are in the oh oh oh could doesn't mean did camp, do you honestly believe no analyst ever took a peek at their boyfriend/girlfriend's phone, texts, emails, whatever. Do you sincerely believe that not one analyst ever creeped on an ex? Really? Really? Because if so, wow, you have a far better opinion of humanity than humanity deserves.
Let's move this to an area within my direct experience. Once upon a time, I was involved in training for my then employer's usage of one of the major legal search content providers. The provider rep came in and gave us the overview on various new databases in our package, including people search information. Said rep stressed, repeatedly, that such searches had to be directly related to a case and had to involve someone in the case, be it party, witness or potential juror. Said rep further emphasized that looking up your ex and your neighbors was a violation of the TOS, not to mention far closer to the line of stalking then anyone wanted to be. The company had the right to terminate immediately the contract should such usage take place. Everyone nodded along and made appropriate oh yes we understand noises. After the rep was done, I got up and reminded everyone that usage was monitored and that I would be going through every single search everyone did for the next two weeks.
All y'all see where this is going. Within 48 hours, I had to reconvene an emergency firm wide meeting where I proceeded to lose my shit at 90+% of my co-workers who had gone out and more or less immediately started creeping on everyone they knew.
I'm sorry, but there is no force on Heaven or Earth that will convince me that the NSA wasn't listening in and/or reading calls inappropriately. If someone can do it, someone will do it. That's basic human nature.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at June 17, 2013 03:47 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Take us away. at June 17, 2013 03:48 AM (Gk3SS)
And that differs from 95% of the "servants of the people" in D.C. in what way?
Posted by: MrScribbler at June 17, 2013 03:49 AM (lNAFm)
If the IRS abuse has been going on since LBJ, the question becomes when did this Administration first learn of it and when did they try to stop the practice.
As opposed to the Bush era sting Operation Wide Receiver. Where BATF put tracking devices on weapons and worked the Mexican police to trace where the weapons went. When it was learned the tracking devices were failing and weapons were getting lost the operation was shut down.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 17, 2013 03:50 AM (UVBO7)
But by all means, let's keep talking about what a rotten dirty no good traitor this one guy is. How about some balance, eh?
Posted by: BurtTC at June 17, 2013 03:52 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: Cretin, a high-grade moron at June 17, 2013 03:52 AM (kymV0)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 03:52 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: Icedog at June 17, 2013 03:52 AM (9ScGj)
http://tinyurl.com/lbb4m9z
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 17, 2013 03:53 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: Cretin, a high-grade moron at June 17, 2013 03:54 AM (kymV0)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 17, 2013 03:55 AM (QXlbZ)
This fucking lying son of a whore was just trying to get in Meeka's thong.
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 17, 2013 03:57 AM (0qYx9)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at June 17, 2013 03:57 AM (+/zXs)
Posted by: Adam at June 17, 2013 03:58 AM (Aif/5)
And suppose... just suppose, there are people who work for the NSA who would like to discredit their enemy, the guy who revealed their secrets. What would that look like?
We're so worried about what lies Snowden told. Is anyone asking who might be telling lies ABOUT him?
Posted by: BurtTC at June 17, 2013 03:58 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 03:58 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Icedog at June 17, 2013 03:58 AM (9ScGj)
Posted by: RWC at June 17, 2013 03:59 AM (qOwz1)
Getting into an argument over whether Dubya Did It, Nixon Did It, Ike Did It or William Howard Taft Did It is both irrelevant and pointless. My basic premise (YMMV, of course) is always to believe that anyone, from any party or ideology, will at some point during they time they have any power abuse it. And they will believe they are Doing It For the Good of the People.
Said abuse of power becomes an issue when, as in Choom Boy's case, it threatens the basic legal foundation of the country, or our security. At that point, it becomes actionable, and should be dealt with.
Of course it won't happen, as our Wise Men -- and eunuchs like Poppin' Fresh -- have decreed that the current occupant of the White House is untouchable.
Posted by: MrScribbler at June 17, 2013 04:00 AM (lNAFm)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 17, 2013 04:01 AM (UVBO7)
http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=740326
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 17, 2013 04:01 AM (QXlbZ)
So Obama hired him because he recognized a kindred spirit.....
Posted by: the guy that moves pianos for a living... at June 17, 2013 04:03 AM (Nl4r1)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at June 17, 2013 04:03 AM (UVBO7)
http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=740326"
It's not that he isn't wrong, but that should lead to a discussion on our culture and what we do to fix it. Where Rubio's aid is completely fucked up is thinking mass immigration of bean pickers is the fix.
Posted by: lowandslow at June 17, 2013 04:05 AM (Fz2C7)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 07:58 AM
I think I've made it clear that -- at least in my opinion -- there is no wiggle room in the law. Criminal behavior is just that, and should be punished as the law prescribes, whether the perp is some computer hack or the president.
Two wrongs, and all that stuff....
From here, I see no real difference in our views.
Posted by: MrScribbler at June 17, 2013 04:05 AM (lNAFm)
Oh, it will be voluntary, but plans are already in the works to make it mandatory.
Fucking Nazi.
[Godwin's Law is accurate]
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at June 17, 2013 04:06 AM (WW8xK)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 04:08 AM (9Bj8R)
Who Snowden is, what he had for breakfast, how big his girlfriend's tits are, etc. etc. deflects from the real issue.
Agreed. The tightness of her ass takes slight precedence.
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at June 17, 2013 04:08 AM (NF2Bf)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 04:08 AM (+98Gb)
Only if you take the position that it's okay for the NSA/Obama to spy on Americans, you trust them completely when they says it's for our own good, and you don't want to know about it if they are breaking the law.
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 17, 2013 04:08 AM (QXlbZ)
I'd like to say "fat chance" but even this Heat fan knows it's over. UGH
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at June 17, 2013 04:09 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: HoboJerky, Hash Hunter at June 17, 2013 04:09 AM (X4HxX)
Posted by: Yip at June 17, 2013 04:09 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 17, 2013 04:10 AM (QXlbZ)
bashing a team that's made it to three finals and a 4 time NBA MVP? isn't the fact the Spurs are going to win enough for you Lebron haters?
Posted by: AuthorLMendez at June 17, 2013 04:10 AM (yAor6)
Posted by: fluffy at June 17, 2013 04:10 AM (z9HTb)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 04:10 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 17, 2013 04:11 AM (cwhM3)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 07:58 AM (+98Gb)
Exactly, and that's why it is happening.
Alinsky was a very, very smart man.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at June 17, 2013 04:11 AM (WW8xK)
Speaker Boehner says he won't bring an immigration bill to the floor if it doesn't have majority support from Republicans.
I had my fingers, legs, toes and eyes crossed when I said that. What I meant was I don't bring an immigration bill to the floor if it doesn't have majority support from RepublicRATs.
Posted by: Bo(eh)ner at June 17, 2013 04:12 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 04:12 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: notachanceinhell at June 17, 2013 04:13 AM (jJA/4)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 04:13 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 04:14 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: fluffy at June 17, 2013 04:15 AM (z9HTb)
Bad news for you though. We'd never have heard of the former, without the latter.
Posted by: GMan at June 17, 2013 04:16 AM (sxq57)
I really want to know what was Snowdens' timeline... why did he want it to come out in late May when he obviously was setting it up since January... He shopped the story a little bit... If this had come out closer to Christmas or early next year it would have really hurt in the mid-terms.. but this is just far enough away.... I don't know..
Posted by: Yip at June 17, 2013 04:16 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Case at June 17, 2013 04:16 AM (o00SF)
Quote of the day at SurvivalBlog:
"We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power." - George Orwell, 1984
Seems very appropriate
Posted by: jj at June 17, 2013 04:17 AM (gWO5X)
Posted by: Cobalt Shiva at June 17, 2013 04:17 AM (OY/SZ)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 17, 2013 04:18 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 04:19 AM (+98Gb)
Posted by: Jose at June 17, 2013 04:20 AM (zc/sw)
Posted by: waldo at June 17, 2013 04:20 AM (RZwdH)
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 17, 2013 04:20 AM (0qYx9)
Posted by: Yip at June 17, 2013 04:20 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 04:21 AM (9Bj8R)
--
Congressmen and possibly SCOTUS should start wearing wires.
Posted by: Lady in Black at June 17, 2013 04:21 AM (ovWeo)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 04:21 AM (9Bj8R)
The information he brought to light should be used to punish those responsible for the violation of our Constitutional rights.
These are not mutually exclusive ideas.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at June 17, 2013 04:22 AM (WW8xK)
Posted by: Weimar Republican at June 17, 2013 04:22 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at June 17, 2013 04:23 AM (cwhM3)
Idiocracy. Does someone have a better antonym for wisdom than the word foolish?
We live in an age of enforced foolishness;
no water toilets that stink
clean air regs that prevent upgrades to electric plants
food piles in basements
government mandated bike paths on major roadways (for your health, of course)
government mandated mosquito breeding ponds
etc
The "Age of Enforced Foolishness" seems to pale for the task.
Posted by: rip van winkin at the 80s at June 17, 2013 04:23 AM (WVMUQ)
Am I the only one who sees a problem there?
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 17, 2013 04:24 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 04:24 AM (+98Gb)
NSA is not to be outdone, will be offering everyone in the country two free years of total existence monitoring.
Posted by: Yip at June 17, 2013 04:25 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 17, 2013 04:25 AM (g1DWB)
Anyone? Anyone?
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 17, 2013 04:25 AM (QXlbZ)
clean air regs that prevent upgrades to electric plants
food piles in basements
government mandated bike paths on major roadways (for your health, of course)
government mandated mosquito breeding ponds
In other words, neo-feudalism. The progs tried and tried and tried to impose it, and it turned out Gaia was the key. Fuck that bitch.
Posted by: Ian S. at June 17, 2013 04:25 AM (OevbG)
--
I'm waiting for one of those years long impact studies. And you're right. This is what the GOP needs to focus on...if it isn't already on board. IMO, Graham is very wrong. This will only hurt the R's massively in '14 and '16 if it passes. He is a boil on the ass of his party.
Posted by: Lady in Black at June 17, 2013 04:25 AM (ovWeo)
"Decriminalize the White House!"
"The IRS knows how much you make,
and what you think!"
"Verizon and NSA
A Communications Dream Team"
Posted by: Weimar Republican at June 17, 2013 04:25 AM (Cnqmv)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at June 17, 2013 04:25 AM (4yFKY)
Mwahaha. Sure.
Those believing that raise your hand. Nobody?
This from the Speaker who has a history of bringing bills to the floor without a majority of Republican support.
I don't know which is sadder. That Republicans believe this will win Hispanic support and save the Party or that Republican leaders are so foolish to believe a "comprehensive" solution filled with loopholes you can drive a truck through will work.
By the way, doesn't our country have bigger problems to solve?
Oh that's right. They'll get to those next. Right.
Posted by: Marcus at June 17, 2013 04:26 AM (GGCsk)
Take a look at comment #153.
There is some great stuff from Orwell!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at June 17, 2013 04:27 AM (WW8xK)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 04:27 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: RiverC at June 17, 2013 04:28 AM (KTytI)
Just askin, because I am a little unclear where the voter representation part is happening.
Posted by: Marcus at June 17, 2013 04:28 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at June 17, 2013 04:28 AM (4yFKY)
Posted by: waldo at June 17, 2013 04:28 AM (RZwdH)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at June 17, 2013 08:25 AM (4yFKY)
If he had cared only about the malfeasance, and hadn't been interested in self-aggrandizement, then he could have dumped the material onto any of a dozen newspapers and walked of into the sunset -- just one more anonymous source.
But he chose a different route; one that may jeopardize his freedom.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at June 17, 2013 04:29 AM (WW8xK)
Almost as long as an Ace movie review but vastly more entertaining...
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 06:52 AM (+98Gb)
I really enjoyed that article (See J.J.? Sometimes I do agree with you.) He gives some great examples of where survivorship bias really points us in the wrong direction.
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at June 17, 2013 04:29 AM (Gkhxf)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 04:29 AM (9Bj8R)
Posted by: JackStraw at June 17, 2013 04:30 AM (g1DWB)
This is either the worst in intelligence leak in our history or the best counter-intelligence op ever. Which would explain why he is still stealing my air.
Posted by: Marcus at June 17, 2013 04:31 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: waldo at June 17, 2013 04:31 AM (RZwdH)
>>The jackasses who manage my building have put in a voluntary bin in the basement. I know rats and roaches would never be attracted to it, right?
Yeh, maybe they'll be like SF and mandate plastic containers that are not rat proof.
Brilliant, ain't it?
Posted by: Mama AJ at June 17, 2013 04:32 AM (SUKHu)
Bingo. And while it sucks that he ran off to China...from his perspective that might've been a better option than simply disappearing from the face of the earth.
Posted by: GMan at June 17, 2013 04:33 AM (sxq57)
Anyone? Anyone?
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 17, 2013 08:25 AM (QXlbZ)
This. I've got no dog in this fight and frankly I'm inclined to think that somebody like Snowden is an untrustworthy douche. But there are very few avenues for true whistleblowers to air their information and none of them are official. Nobody in an organization likes a snitch and anybody claiming otherwise is a fucking liar. Anybody believing that is as dumb as anybody who bought into the happy horseshit that organizations support people who "think outside the box".
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 17, 2013 04:34 AM (0qYx9)
Posted by: KristenS at June 17, 2013 04:35 AM (Z5Wwq)
Exactamundo.
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 17, 2013 04:35 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at June 17, 2013 04:36 AM (+98Gb)
But the half wits would still vote for him again because of womyn in binders and other assorted BS
Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 17, 2013 04:36 AM (1Jaio)
They also need to ask the question why should we reward the people breaking the law. Honest immigrants are welcome, illegals are not.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 04:36 AM (lZvxr)
It is all becoming clear. Criminal enterprise.... Chicago politics in D.C.
Posted by: Yip at June 17, 2013 04:37 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 17, 2013 04:39 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 17, 2013 04:39 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: georgeofthedesert at June 17, 2013 04:39 AM (Eq2MX)
I had that article in one of the daily news dumps a few days ago.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 04:39 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: georgeofthedesert at June 17, 2013 08:39 AM (Eq2MX)
Perhaps I should have said "activist" atheists.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 04:41 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: BuddyPC at June 17, 2013 04:42 AM (bYQ1a)
Are you referring to Clarice Feldman's "Obama is Abrading the Social Fabric" from the American Thinker yesterday?
Posted by: Captain Hate at June 17, 2013 04:42 AM (0qYx9)
..............
Here's the one big problem with that.
NO PROGRAM should be secret from the American public. The results of those programs? Yes.. most definitely.
But when an agency flaunts the laws and creates new programs out of whole cloth, referencing existing laws that do NOT apply, then the agency becomes the criminal.
Snowden's revealing an illegal program should not be considered a crime. If Congress has not authorized the program, it is not a legal program, and efforts to inform the public should be rewarded - hence the whistleblower laws.
Any information revealed by Snowden that was captured by those programs or that in any way hurts the security of the United States, should be prosecuted.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at June 17, 2013 04:42 AM (UTq/I)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 17, 2013 04:43 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: waldo at June 17, 2013 04:43 AM (RZwdH)
Morning, all!
What new and exciting scandal will emerge this week? Anyone want to hazard a guess? What major agency hasn't been involved in a scandal recently? Education?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/u][/i] at June 17, 2013 04:44 AM (4df7R)
There are two kinds of atheists. There are the kind that just don't believe, and don't care what others believe.
And then there are the douchebags who consider it their mission to show anyone who believes that they are stupid, blame religion for every problem in the world, and stand up organizations like Americans United for the Separation of Church and State with a goal of stigmatizing religious belief and sterilizing the public sphere of all references to Christian faith.
I call the latter group "Theophobes."
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 17, 2013 04:45 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: Motorhead at June 17, 2013 04:45 AM (fRolu)
Once you say it's ok with the Federal Govt' to illegally enter the U.S., you'll get more of it. Of course, they reserve the right to deport you if say, you're not hispanic... say German... and want to homeschool... heh
Posted by: Yip at June 17, 2013 04:46 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: I'm lighting my torch now... at June 17, 2013 04:46 AM (ULH4o)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 17, 2013 04:46 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at June 17, 2013 04:46 AM (9Bj8R)
Was it a reference to the USAToday article in the sidebar about the three NSA vets?
Posted by: GMan at June 17, 2013 04:48 AM (sxq57)
Posted by: Yip at June 17, 2013 04:48 AM (/jHWN)
You can't donate your leftover edible bagels to feed the homeless because fat/salt/labels, you must put them in a bin in the alley to feed the rats.
My grandfather would say if brains were dynamite, Bloomberg would be safe in a blast furnace.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 17, 2013 04:49 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: alexthechick - Mmmm. Blondes with whipped cream. at June 17, 2013 04:50 AM (VtjlW)
I think you want to ask this question at some other site.
Maybe Tepid Air?
Morons are crude. I think it's in the Terms of Use somewhere....
Posted by: MrScribbler at June 17, 2013 04:50 AM (lNAFm)
Posted by: SarahW at June 17, 2013 04:50 AM (LYwCh)
Arne Duncan head of the D of Ed. Read up on him. You'll find the scandals.
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at June 17, 2013 04:51 AM (MnSla)
Your tax dollars at work!
At least if you live in St. Louis.
Dangerous Dogs On The Loose In North St. Louis County
ST. LOUIS COUNTY (KMOX) – Dangerous dogs are becoming more of a problem in parts of north St. Louis County.
ItÂ’s so bad, some people say theyÂ’re afraid to go out for a morning jog...
...Another woman complained that she had called County Animal Control about a couple of pit bulls who followed her around outside, but nothing was done.
At a town hall meeting Thursday evening, County Animal Control recommended people go out walking with an umbrella, a cane, or a stick...
Yes, folks. When there are dangerous dogs running loose in your neighborhood, attacking joggers and stalking pedestrians, your best defense is an umbrella, a cane, or a stick. Presumably this way you can hit one dog while the other members of its pack rip out your jugular and/or shred your leg tendons.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/u][/i] at June 17, 2013 04:52 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: alexthechick - Mmmm. Blondes with whipped cream. at June 17, 2013 04:53 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: alexthechick - Mmmm. Blondes with whipped cream. at June 17, 2013 08:53 AM (VtjlW)
If they're holding tamales, then make way for Mooch!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/b][/u][/i] at June 17, 2013 04:55 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: mindful webworker, your servant, dear morons at June 17, 2013 04:55 AM (Jh9QN)
I like that. I call them "evangelical athiests", since their beliefs and activities share a lot of characteristics with many world religions: They organize in groups to preach about the transgressions good humans should avoid and try to convert (or destroy) the infidels.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ at June 17, 2013 04:56 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 17, 2013 04:56 AM (/PCJa)
http://goo.gl/kTgKC
Ouch
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at June 17, 2013 04:59 AM (MnSla)
Posted by: Somewhat Sorry To Offend You at June 17, 2013 04:59 AM (n0B9h)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 17, 2013 05:00 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 05:00 AM (lZvxr)
Spend more resources spying on allies and biggest trade partners than on enemies.
Muslim countries? CAN'T SPY ON THEM THEY'LL GET MAD AT US.
Posted by: RiverC at June 17, 2013 05:00 AM (KTytI)
If only Chicago had some gun laws none of this would happen.
Posted by: TheQuietMan at June 17, 2013 05:01 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: alexthechick - Mmmm. Blondes with whipped cream. at June 17, 2013 05:01 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 05:02 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: RiverC at June 17, 2013 05:02 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: Chicagotards at June 17, 2013 05:03 AM (n0B9h)
Local new guys here in Texas were talking about a border patrol agent who was saying border crossings are at an all time high in the Rio Grande Valley and they have been ordered to do nothing.
Looks like Odolph has put out red meat for border crossers and they've turned it up to 11 to get in on the freebies.
They were quoting a news story, so there must be one out there...somewhere.
Weird. Here is a quote from a news story. Yahoo said it was International Herald Tribune, but it took me to NYT.
"Agents have also had to double up in patrol vehicles, or have been ordered to sit in their vehicles without driving. Several parts of the border, like one 25-mile stretch west of McAllen, are at times not being watched, so the number of migrants who cross from Mexico without getting caught is surging, too, three agents said in interviews last week. “It’s really demoralizing because there’s so much traffic passing through here and we can’t do anything about it,” one agent said Friday while on patrol, asking that his name not be used because he was not authorized to speak publicly. “And when you try to do something and they won’t let you do it,” he added, having been ordered during recent shifts not to drive his truck, “it’s just really demoralizing.”
Posted by: Invictus at June 17, 2013 05:03 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at June 17, 2013 05:04 AM (QXlbZ)
I was OK with the Patriot Act which required them to get a warrant from a special court and only allowed monitoring calls to and from foreign countries. I am not OK with them monitoring Americans in country indiscriminately without a warrant.
That is not only unconstitutional, it is illegal and some assholes need to go to jail.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 05:05 AM (lZvxr)
Posted by: alexthechick - Mmmm. Blondes with whipped cream. at June 17, 2013 05:05 AM (VtjlW)
The fact he even has to say that shows how far we are fucked. Can you imagine Tip ONeil saying that - he would have killed the bill on the general principle that the WH and Senate starting something without first kissing his ass.
Posted by: Jean at June 17, 2013 05:05 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: GuyWhoDoesntGiveAFuck at June 17, 2013 05:06 AM (7ObY1)
"Snowden violated every oath he ever took. Whether the Gov is "spying" in us and how is a whole other issue."
And one that's much too hard to deal with. So let's happily form a lynch mob to "get" the guy who's tossed this uncomfortable problem into our laps. That's what this is all about: people who are too cowardly and slothful to face the immense trouble and difficulty involved in throttling an out-of-control government. So instead, they'll turn with relief to the puttering little task of hanging in chains one individual - the one who's embarrassed them by forcing them to face the fact that they have no intention of doing ANYTHING to recover their lost liberty.
Posted by: Dr. Mabuse at June 17, 2013 05:07 AM (FkH4y)
In other words, I think that old espionage model, at least as applied to this kind of activity, is broken.
It also may be that, drunk on hubris and lazy on foot, our own government far overstepped the philosophical presuppositions behind such secrecy. With congress so 'far behind' technologically, it was bound to happen.
Posted by: RiverC at June 17, 2013 05:07 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: alexthechick - Mmmm. Blondes with whipped cream. at June 17, 2013 05:08 AM (VtjlW)
And piss on the caps lock key.
Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 05:08 AM (lZvxr)
Why would any conservative use him as a squirrel? Cut it out.
Posted by: SarahW at June 17, 2013 05:08 AM (LYwCh)
I reserve that term for every brain-dead, constituency-deaf, US second, everybody else first, US destroying, immigration passing Congressman and Senator.
Posted by: dogfish at June 17, 2013 05:08 AM (nsOJa)
Posted by: Your GOP "buying" nada voters with your jobs at June 17, 2013 05:09 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: LIV at June 17, 2013 05:09 AM (0n1+D)
Don't FBI and Congress critters take a similar oath to the one Snowden would have taken?
How come they get a pass?
Posted by: Invictus at June 17, 2013 05:10 AM (OQpzc)
Posted by: alexthechick - Mmmm. Blondes with whipped cream. at June 17, 2013 05:11 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: maddogg at June 17, 2013 05:11 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 17, 2013 05:12 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Nunyobidnez at June 17, 2013 05:12 AM (RZvso)
Posted by: Jean at June 17, 2013 05:13 AM (CMlD4)
Sure, it is odd after years of vacuuming up data that Microsoft chose to only disclose the last six months of requests and those 6,000 requests let to 31,000 consumer accounts were monitored.
There maybe some multiplication factor involved - but it is nothing we can't explain away in the NYT Op-ed pages (for each single request 5 accounts were monitored). Move On is my motto!
"For the six months ended December 31, 2012, Microsoft received between 6,000 and 7,000 criminal and national security warrants, subpoenas and orders affecting between 31,000 and 32,000 consumer accounts from US governmental entities (including local, state and federal)," said John Frank, vice president & deputy general counsel, Microsoft.
http://tinyurl.com/lgsvhc3
Btw, John Frank has no relationship with me.
Posted by: Barney F. at June 17, 2013 05:14 AM (m5Tr1)
Posted by: SarahW at June 17, 2013 05:14 AM (LYwCh)
Posted by: PaleRider at June 17, 2013 05:14 AM (m+nIW)
Posted by: BRB need to refill my tampon at June 17, 2013 05:15 AM (0n1+D)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 17, 2013 05:15 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Jean at June 17, 2013 05:16 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) at June 17, 2013 05:16 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: RiverC at June 17, 2013 05:17 AM (KTytI)
Posted by: alexthechick - Mmmm. Blondes with whipped cream. at June 17, 2013 05:17 AM (VtjlW)
AllenG: No they aren't. The Government has long had rights to the meta-data (did a package go from A to B, on what date, how much did it weigh) from the postal system or FedEx, just not the contents of the letters. They have standing to get the meta-data (just not the NSA, whether or not they working for the FBI - its not in their charter). Your Fourth Amendment rights start where the expectation of privacy begins - you don't get that with the metadata.
Posted by: Jean at June 17, 2013 05:20 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: Bamboozled at June 17, 2013 05:30 AM (7A2Iv)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/s]akula_51 at June 17, 2013 05:30 AM (Vgn84)
Once again, he's said nothing we didn't already know or assume. So clearly he must be a traitor.
Oh wait...Drudge has China flatly denying he's their agent. Sure, they could be lying. Then again, I guess it's just too much to ponder the idea that not only is he doing this on his own, but that if you want real transparency, you're getting it.
Posted by: Michael at June 17, 2013 05:51 AM (Y/HG5)
Posted by: notsothoreau at June 17, 2013 05:58 AM (Lqy/e)
Posted by: Michael the Hobbit, but you can call me Michael at June 17, 2013 05:58 AM (vVMIQ)
Posted by: Your GOP selling peon slavery stateside at June 17, 2013 06:12 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: secretary of state at June 17, 2013 07:24 AM (hEWK0)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2527 seconds, 416 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Vic at June 17, 2013 02:50 AM (lZvxr)