September 26, 2013
— andy Happy Thursday.
Today's starter course consists solely of this piece by Michael Walsh at The Corner. A taste:
Conservatives have finally realized that, as itÂ’s currently constituted, they have no home in the Republican party, which is the Washington Generals to the DemocratsÂ’ Harlem Globetrotters, the designated losers who nevertheless are rewarded handsomely for their sham opposition.
You'll enjoy the rest.
AoSHQ Weekly Podcast: [
Now on Stitcher
Posted by: andy at
02:36 AM
| Comments (348)
Post contains 75 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:38 AM (zZbNF)
http://tinyurl.com/p5c8xy5
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:38 AM (zZbNF)
http://tinyurl.com/mtul5fu
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:39 AM (zZbNF)
http://tinyurl.com/m99s5js
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:39 AM (zZbNF)
http://tinyurl.com/kn9282o
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:39 AM (zZbNF)
http://tinyurl.com/ljq2r5k
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:40 AM (zZbNF)
http://tinyurl.com/mn59so9
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:40 AM (zZbNF)
http://tinyurl.com/p7pudkw
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:40 AM (zZbNF)
http://tinyurl.com/lwn3dp3
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:41 AM (zZbNF)
Cruz wasn't long off the floor before Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., a war hero, raised a white flag in one of the most disgraceful Senate speeches ever delivered.
http://tinyurl.com/nya2s2m
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:41 AM (zZbNF)
http://tinyurl.com/mk24lh2
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:42 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: Boone at September 26, 2013 02:43 AM (tIyK2)
The pendulum is never denied. It swung sooo far to the left in 2008 it's gonna take a huge burst of momentum to bring it to the right. But it will, so lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way. I'm looking at you McCain.
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at September 26, 2013 02:44 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at September 26, 2013 02:44 AM (9DDfG)
Posted by: Little Miss Spellcheck at September 26, 2013 02:45 AM (a5ljo)
Thanks, as always, Vic. About the stink bugs, what's your situation where you live? Here in SE Pennsylvania, they're still around but every year there seems to be fewer. I'm hoping they prefer southern hospitality.
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at September 26, 2013 02:46 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at September 26, 2013 06:44 AM (9DDfG)
CA uses very little electricity for heating. Mostly they use natural gas and don't need much heating anyway. The NE uses mainly #2 fuel oil. The big electricity user is the South.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:46 AM (zZbNF)
If he likes McShitty then he is no conservative.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:47 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at September 26, 2013 02:48 AM (9DDfG)
I have seen a few around this Summer but nothing out of the ordinary. CA seems to be the most impacted State but they will be moving East as time goes by.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:49 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: Bigby's Thumb at September 26, 2013 02:49 AM (x2tRO)
Posted by: Boone at September 26, 2013 02:50 AM (tIyK2)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at September 26, 2013 02:51 AM (9DDfG)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at September 26, 2013 06:51 AM (9DDfG)
Germany has bought entirely into the green bullshit and all energy costs have gone through the roof.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:52 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: Boone at September 26, 2013 02:53 AM (tIyK2)
Posted by: Bob at September 26, 2013 02:54 AM (qTsuK)
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:54 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at September 26, 2013 02:55 AM (9DDfG)
Morning, ‘rons and ‘ronettes.
My well of stories is running a little dry, so I hope youÂ’ll forgive me if I donÂ’t post anything for a couple of days.
For today, though, I am going to give you a one-minute clip from D.W. Griffith’s 1916 epic Intolerance. The film, partially made in answer to critics of The Birth of A Nation, is a sprawling 3 ½ hour epic which intercuts four parallel storylines, each selected to represent the theme of “intolerance” through the ages: the “Babylonian Story,” showing the conquest of the peaceful Babylonians by the Persians; the “Judean Story” showing Christ’s crucifixion; the “French Story,” which depicts the St. Bartholomew’s Day massacre in 1572; and a “Modern Story” of crime and redemption.
The clip I’ve linked is the famous tracking shot from the Babylonian story, showing Belshazzar’s courtyard – a massive set (located at the corner of Sunset Drive and Hollywood Boulevard, site of the present-day Vista Theatre) rising nearly 300 feet high and covering an entire city block. To film, Griffith originally planned to shoot from a tethered balloon, but found he could not keep his camera steady. The solution? A giant grain elevator mounted on railroad tracks so that Griffith and cameraman Billy Bitzer could move up and down as they came closer and closer to the set. It was an astonishing shot in its day, and still is now:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWbRuhmsHPM
Hope you all have a wonderful day.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at September 26, 2013 02:58 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Bob at September 26, 2013 02:58 AM (qTsuK)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 02:58 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 02:58 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at September 26, 2013 02:59 AM (9DDfG)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 03:01 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: Boone at September 26, 2013 06:43 AM (tIyK2)
-----
And just how is he a conservative? Why not George Clooney or Sean Penn, they know how to speak well before a camera.
Posted by: Darth Randall at September 26, 2013 03:01 AM (Zswg6)
Posted by: Paladin at September 26, 2013 03:01 AM (o4O82)
FIFY
Posted by: CrotchetyOldJarhead at September 26, 2013 06:59 AM (9DDfG)
They work fine in the South and that is what most people use in the South. Some are using gas packs with them but that varies with the price and availability of natural gas.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 03:01 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: The Pendulum at September 26, 2013 03:02 AM (wPzgV)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 26, 2013 03:02 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at September 26, 2013 03:03 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 03:06 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at September 26, 2013 03:09 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 03:09 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 03:11 AM (9qZgK)
Yes, it's nice camera movement, but the princess has an amazing rack!
That's Seena Owen, whom I linked to a while back in a clip from Queen Kelly, showing her, naked except for a fur-trimmed robe, horsewhipping Gloria Swanson through the palace.
Got a meeting, everyone. See you in an hour or so.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at September 26, 2013 03:11 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Boone at September 26, 2013 03:12 AM (tIyK2)
Posted by: All the Starving Middle Class Polar Bear Children at September 26, 2013 03:13 AM (zdOaO)
Posted by: Captain Hate on his iPhone at September 26, 2013 03:14 AM (sSqF3)
http://bit.ly/14Khofz
Remember when we had a foreign policy apparatus that was smart enough to keep our enemies at each others throats?
Yeah, those days are getting fuzzy for me too, but at least the whole world likes us now, right?
Yeah, right.
Oh, and good morning everyone!
Posted by: Nighthawk at September 26, 2013 03:15 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Kreplach at September 26, 2013 03:15 AM (Srkkh)
Posted by: shredded chi at September 26, 2013 03:16 AM (7FgN5)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 26, 2013 03:17 AM (uhAkr)
Posted by: Secretary of State John Forbes Kerry at September 26, 2013 03:17 AM (xGDj+)
I will not waste my vote on what is now a wing of the Democrat Party.
John McCain is the leader of the Chicken wing of the Democrat party. He, and a number of others need to be eased out of office. I keep thinking AZ might do that in McCain's case, but alas no...they keep sending the POS back. Grrrr.
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at September 26, 2013 03:18 AM (sCynV)
Posted by: Meghan McMac [/i] at September 26, 2013 03:20 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: backhoe at September 26, 2013 03:21 AM (ULH4o)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 26, 2013 03:21 AM (V3kRK)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 03:21 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 03:22 AM (9qZgK)
If the GOP were a plumbing company that for the last 25 plus years had lied to you, broken it's promises, performed lousy work at rediculously high prices, would you continue using them?
And if you complained to that company and their response was; "Hey pal, what other company are you going to use?" Would you still use them?
I will no longer vote for a candidate simply because he/she has an 'R' after their name. For far too long I've been told I have to vote for the GOP because they're better than the Demonrats, or they're the least objectionable and voting third party is a waste of my vote. Well, maybe. But considering how the GOP has performed, maybe voting for them was also a wasted vote.
In the future my vote will go to the candidate that agrees with me the most, and if that is a third party, then so be it.
I will no longer be Charlie Brown to the GOP's version of Lucy with the football.
Posted by: ExSnipe at September 26, 2013 03:23 AM (57ubW)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 03:24 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 03:25 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: Strategic Corporal USMC at September 26, 2013 03:25 AM (6J+oK)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 26, 2013 03:25 AM (uhAkr)
A protest is scheduled for this afternoon at tbe admin building.
Yes, the lawyers (alredy retained) are going to have a field day.
Posted by: shredded chi at September 26, 2013 07:16 AM (7FgN5)
--------------
First, as a minor, shouldn't his disciplinary records not be available to the public?
Second, the child is black. Clearly the school is racist to consider expulsion.
Posted by: Darth Randall at September 26, 2013 03:27 AM (Zswg6)
Mr. Walsh may be right, the time is ripe for new leadership to grasp control of the GOP. I am less than optimistic however, that it will work, because frankly, the problem with the GOP is not just its leadership in Washington.
The problem is also that there are many many idiots who call themselves Republicans, who have no real connection to conservatism. We have plenty of those folks right here, in AoSHQ city.
Posted by: BurtTC at September 26, 2013 03:28 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: the littl shyning man at September 26, 2013 03:28 AM (m7EZK)
GOP = The Monroe Brothers from "Green Acres," but without the likability... or competence.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 07:25 AM (WjLUf)
With Haney as their chief advisor.
Posted by: ExSnipe at September 26, 2013 03:29 AM (57ubW)
Great article. I am very much looking forward to bringing McCain's cabana boy home for good next year.
Posted by: Ghost of Lee Atwater at September 26, 2013 03:31 AM (JxMoP)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 03:31 AM (WjLUf)
Second, the child is black. Clearly the school is racist to consider expulsion.
Posted by: Darth Randall at September 26, 2013 07:27 AM (Zswg6)
========
I can't find my Liberal Issues Hierarchy and Aggrieved Groups Scorecard- does "Racism" trump "Save the Children from the Ebil Black Guns"?
Posted by: Nighthawk at September 26, 2013 03:34 AM (OtQXp)
Winner, winner, chicken dinner.
I am glad to see that others are climbing on my primary them all bandwagon. (Yes, yes, I know that's not what was said but work with me, people, work with me.) Yes, that includes Cruz and Paul and the like.
Our Betters need a very clear and very harsh reminder that they work for us. It should never, ever, ever be what did Sen. Cruz do to deserve to be primaried. It should always, always, always be what did Sen. Cruz do to deserve to remain in office. If that question cannot be answered satisfactorily? Bye bye bye.
Posted by: alexthechick - Really Universe Really? at September 26, 2013 03:34 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: John McMac [/i] at September 26, 2013 03:35 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at September 26, 2013 03:35 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Hipper Than Thou at September 26, 2013 03:36 AM (zdOaO)
Posted by: Hipper Than Thou at September 26, 2013 03:37 AM (zdOaO)
Posted by: Secretary of State John Forbes Kerry at September 26, 2013 03:41 AM (xGDj+)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 26, 2013 03:43 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: alexthechick - Really Universe Really? at September 26, 2013 07:34 AM (Gk3SS)
--------
Clearly Alex is the much rumored sixth N-Synche member.
Posted by: Darth Randall at September 26, 2013 03:44 AM (Zswg6)
A protest is scheduled for this afternoon at tbe admin building.
Yes, the lawyers (alredy retained) are going to have a field day. Posted by: shredded chi at September 26, 2013 07:16 AM (7FgN5)
What. The. Hell. Was he drunk and high?
Last I knew, unauthorized release of school records, let alone a minor's school records, was a FERPA. FERPA violations are serious you guys business. Not to mention this probably violates any number of state laws on privacy. Of course, FERPA doesn't give rise to a private cause of action and it's highly doubtful that the appropriate yanking of federal funds will occur because guns but still.
This lends support to my theory that the pathetic gash who called the cops when she knew damn well the kids did not have real guns is a spouse or family relation to someone on the school board or administration and the school is trying to hush that up.
Posted by: alexthechick - Really Universe Really? at September 26, 2013 03:44 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Jesse Pinkman at September 26, 2013 03:45 AM (T0Pku)
Posted by: Case at September 26, 2013 03:45 AM (9mWut)
Posted by: mindful webworker sans socks at September 26, 2013 03:46 AM (zdOaO)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at September 26, 2013 03:46 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: nothinglefttolose at September 26, 2013 03:47 AM (d4o2E)
Posted by: Jesse Pinkman at September 26, 2013 03:47 AM (T0Pku)
That's fine when there's enough loot to go around. But that's not going to be true for much longer.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at September 26, 2013 07:17 AM (uhAkr)"
And that is why I advocate handing out federal government owned land, including ANWR, in 40 acre units as slavery reparations. It will drive a wedge between blacks and greens.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at September 26, 2013 03:50 AM (31Nrp)
Posted by: Jesse Pinkman at September 26, 2013 07:47 AM (T0Pku)
=======
So if St. Trayvon had shot GZ with an AirSoft pistol instead of trying to beat his brains out with the sidewalk his school discipline records could have been made public.
Who knew?
Posted by: Nighthawk at September 26, 2013 03:54 AM (OtQXp)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at September 26, 2013 03:55 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at September 26, 2013 03:55 AM (8JJ6O)
1. The party feels very good about Terry Land winning the US senate seat being vacated by Karl Lenin. She is very well liked in the state and the likely Democrat opponent is known as a bad campaigner.
2. The internal GOP feeling on the Tea Party is that while they agree with the Tea Party and appreciate the support, the Tea Party unnecessarily makes enemies by being too strident. They would have more influence if they were more cooperative and less confrontational.
Just his insights.
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at September 26, 2013 03:55 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: nothinglefttolose at September 26, 2013 03:55 AM (M7Cfv)
from the piece, this is completely wrong:
to that end, conservatives understand that rather than form a third party, their only hope is to seize control of the corrupt, rotting hulk of the GOP, which they now can do with the help of a reinvigorated Tea Party — especially with Lois Lerner’s IRS off its back.
We have tried this for twenty years. We get "conservative" politicians elected, only to watch them get sucked into and become part of the GOP machine. When the machine itself is too corrupt, taking it over is not the answer, particularly when every attempt to date has utterly failed. With every conservative victory in a primary or even general election, the GOP establishment fights back harder and ends up winning.
Plus, part of the problem is the big time GOP donors. The simple fact is that the moneybags don't care about conservatism, they care about business. And big gov't is usually good for big business. It helps lock out small businesses that could become competitors and keeps cash flowing from the gov't to big business (and helps keep the flow of cheap illegal immigration coming). We'll never wean the party off of the big money.
The liberals have the advantage on that score. Their big donors are either Labor - who want hard left policies - or true believers in communist/socialist thought (like Soros). So, the DNC doesn't have to "move right" to appease their money. The GOP has to stay left to keep its money happy.
The idea that THIS TIME, the GOP will wake up if we rally hard enough, is once again, abused girlfriend syndrome. It isn't going to happen. The same thing that always happens will happen. the GOP will say some consoling things, make some meaningless gesture, and then capitulate to the left.
And the same people will tell us that the answer is to work harder within the GOP.
I know that third parties are difficult. But, I'm not even advocating that at this point. At this point, I'm advocating killing the GOP. Starving it of money (donations from small donors, like us). Starving it of activists/volunteers. And starving it of votes.
The same refrain will be heard - but that means the Dems will win!!!! Yeah? And if the GOP wins, what does that get conservatism? Nothing. It furthers the leftist agenda - perhaps a little more slowly, but it still furthers the leftist agenda.
Once the GOP is killed, a new party can start to be formed. Or, maybe - maybe, out of the ashes of the GOP, we can build a conservative party.
And, before the usual chorus starts about TruCon and all that nonsense. I'm not even talking about a "pure" conservative party. I'm talking about a party that is at least remotely conservative, rather than the shell game we currently have.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2013 03:56 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at September 26, 2013 03:57 AM (IXrOn)
To that end, conservatives understand that rather than form a third party, their only hope is to seize control of the corrupt, rotting hulk of the GOP, which they now can do with the help of a reinvigorated Tea Party — especially with Lois Lerner’s IRS off its back.
If only the IRS were off our back - they're still targeting the Tea Party the last time I checked (and that was just before I went on vacation).
Posted by: steveegg at September 26, 2013 03:58 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 03:58 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: nothinglefttolose at September 26, 2013 03:58 AM (M7Cfv)
Posted by: The Herd of RINOs at September 26, 2013 03:59 AM (zdOaO)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 04:00 AM (WjLUf)
We also have a ban on incandescent light bulbs. And the energy savings are meaningless.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 07:06 AM (zZbNF)
But because the enforcement of that has been defunded, they're still being made and sold.
Gee, I wonder what else could be stopped with a full-blown defunding?
Posted by: steveegg at September 26, 2013 04:02 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Jesse Pinkman at September 26, 2013 04:03 AM (T0Pku)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 04:04 AM (WjLUf)
Your brother may be right, if he is talking specifically about Michigan county politics, but he is wrong if he is talking about Washington.
There is a cancer in the Capitol, and being all nice and reach-across-the-aisle with the cancer is not going to work.
Posted by: BurtTC at September 26, 2013 04:04 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 26, 2013 04:04 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at September 26, 2013 04:04 AM (1RQeV)
Posted by: Case at September 26, 2013 07:45 AM (9mWut)
There isn't a single house in my entire neighborhood that doesn't use a heat pump. And they are not supposed to run all the time. If they do someone has the thermostat set incorrectly.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 04:05 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: The Far, Far Left at September 26, 2013 04:06 AM (zdOaO)
Posted by: nothinglefttolose at September 26, 2013 04:06 AM (Nsomq)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at September 26, 2013 04:06 AM (U2UQk)
Peeple-hi.
I'm still chuckling over Ace getting my goat yesterday afternoon in the Booker/stripper thread. That hasn't happened to me in quite a while.
Ace, you magnificent Ewok you.
SNAFU.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at September 26, 2013 04:08 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 04:09 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Case at September 26, 2013 04:09 AM (9mWut)
Posted by: Far Ting Island at September 26, 2013 04:09 AM (zdOaO)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 04:10 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 04:10 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 26, 2013 04:12 AM (JDIKC)
Yep. For being a bit too tough on Gabe.
I understand it is temporary.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse
Blasphemer! Stone him!
Posted by: Uncle Tommy at September 26, 2013 04:12 AM (VWfCN)
Sven, according to Mætenloch, was given a time out. Something to do with bad mouthing the cobs.
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at September 26, 2013 04:12 AM (MnSla)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 04:12 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 07:06 AM (zZbNF)
Math is hard.
I'll bet that if you add in the cost of recycling and the additional weight of the bulbs (shippers charge by weight!), there is no savings at all.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 26, 2013 04:12 AM (gqgiP)
His mother is white.
In his formative years he was raised abroad.
His upbringing was solidly middle class white.
His educational pedigree is entirely elitist.
And so he shares nothing of the life experiences that would qualify him as being authentically Hispanic.
Cruz is basically a faux Hispanic; he is really just a white guy with some superficial Hispanic traits; name, appearance, etc.
Thought you should know.
Posted by: MSNBC Brane Thrust and Liberal commentariat at September 26, 2013 04:12 AM (YBusZ)
Posted by: Director NASA Islamic Outreach Program at September 26, 2013 04:13 AM (U2UQk)
Good morning
Like I was saying above, taking over the GOP is a fool's errand. This is the intra-party Lucy's Football: We always try to take it over, every other election cycle, and we get a beachhead of conservatives in, they do some gestures, the RINOs make some concessions, and we go back to losing.
The GOP brand is dogshit, serious you guys. Nobody outside of our mutually-hating tribes are going to vote GOP and the Establishment [however you define that] will never let anything go, nor change that branding in a way that cons will accept. That is the recipe for future failshit for as long as you can predict.
When the Repubs were founded they were a Third Party in Wisconsin. They lost their first elections, but didn't give up, and became more militant. They found their spines and people flocked to them. Possibly when the Tea Party gets over its own shit or get off the pot moment, they'll do the same.
For my money, I'd nominate Ben Carson on the Libertarian ticket, but YMMV.
Posted by: Bigby's Dice-Rolling Hand at September 26, 2013 04:13 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 26, 2013
Not completely true. Some are corrupt shills.
Posted by: Uncle Tommy at September 26, 2013 04:13 AM (VWfCN)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 26, 2013 04:14 AM (JDIKC)
"To that end, conservatives understand that rather than form a third party, their only hope is to seize control of the corrupt, rotting hulk of the GOP, which they now can do with the help of a reinvigorated Tea Party — especially with Lois Lerner’s IRS off its back."
Proof, please, the IRS has been leashed?
Posted by: Cicero Kid at September 26, 2013 04:14 AM (DHQv9)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 26, 2013 04:15 AM (V3kRK)
Posted by: alexthechick - Here SMOD SMOD SMOD at September 26, 2013 04:15 AM (ZXylp)
Bay waters at Smith Island rising at twice the world average? The water don't lie. That's why we have liquids in 'spirit' levels. Global warming cultists are the bastard children of Rachel Carson.
Posted by: EROWMER at September 26, 2013 04:15 AM (OONaw)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 04:15 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: Typical Lefty [/i] at September 26, 2013 04:15 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 26, 2013 04:16 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: shredded chi at September 26, 2013 04:16 AM (7FgN5)
Posted by: mindful webworker in disguise with glasses at September 26, 2013 04:17 AM (i5xnd)
Math is hard.
I'll bet that if you add in the cost of recycling and the additional weight of the bulbs (shippers charge by weight!), there is no savings at all.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 26, 2013 08:12 AM (gqgiP)
Add to it most of the "long-life" alternatives (specifically halogen and LED), well, aren't. A bar I sometimes play cribbage at replaced its Legacy Edison Bulbs with fancy LEDs less than 2 years ago. Nearly a third of them have already burned out.
Posted by: steveegg at September 26, 2013 04:17 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: alexthechick - Here SMOD SMOD SMOD at September 26, 2013 08:15 AM (ZXylp)
Alinsky's "Rules For Conservatives" needs to be written, read, and followed.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 26, 2013 04:17 AM (gqgiP)
they're a bunch of fucking idiots.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 26, 2013
Not completely true. Some are corrupt shills.
Posted by: Uncle Tommy at September 26, 2013 08:13 AM (VWfCN)
How about fucking corrupt idiot shills?
Posted by: steveegg at September 26, 2013 04:18 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 26, 2013 04:20 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 04:20 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: CarolT at September 26, 2013 04:21 AM (z4WKX)
Posted by: steveegg at September 26, 2013 08:17 AM (o44nj)
I just installed one LED because it was on sale at Costco. I saved the box, wrote down the date of installation, and will see for myself whether it is going to last 23 years. Yeah, that's what they claim.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 26, 2013 04:22 AM (gqgiP)
Attentin, your attention please - in less than 8 minutes, the inevitable final downward revision to 2Q GDP will happen.
Place your bets on how far under the 2.5% annualized "real" growth this revision will be. Prop bet - California will not have reported its initial jobless claims for the third week in a row, driving that roughly 30K lower than it would otherwise be.
Posted by: steveegg at September 26, 2013 04:23 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Typical Lefty [/i] at September 26, 2013 04:23 AM (U2UQk)
--
Yeah, somehow, that never seems to affect the majority radical elements that have taken over the Democrat party.
Posted by: Lady in Black at September 26, 2013 04:24 AM (XB5Ak)
Stop drilling - you struck oil.
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 26, 2013 08:20 AM (JDIKC)
Time to pump the well dry.
Posted by: steveegg at September 26, 2013 04:24 AM (o44nj)
Like I was saying above, taking over the GOP is a fool's errand. This is the intra-party Lucy's Football: We always try to take it over, every other election cycle, and we get a beachhead of conservatives in, they do some gestures, the RINOs make some concessions, and we go back to losing.
Not to fuss too much, but I believe that may be easier than you think. The TP has been fairly effective in bypassing the national GOP by donating money directly to candidates. Look at the progress made in just a few short years. Social media and this Intarwebz thingy have helped a lot, along with talk radio.
Found a Rush clip from yesterday where he pointed out the Grand Canyon-sized schism in American politics and how Cruz highlighted this with his speech. It certainly didn't take long for the likes of McLame and Peter "Peter" King to start bashing him and expose themselves for the liberals they really are. These appeasers are way past their expiration date and need to be replaced asap. Now they're feeling the fire from conservatives (whom they've ignored) and they're getting a bit uncomfortable.
Good.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at September 26, 2013 04:24 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 04:24 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 26, 2013 04:25 AM (V3kRK)
Posted by: CarolT at September 26, 2013 04:25 AM (z4WKX)
Posted by: Case at September 26, 2013 04:26 AM (wf3Kt)
Attended by the likes of John McQueeg and all the other statist pricks currently making all our lives miserable - no thanks.
I've solidified my position that the only thing that even has a prayer of saving us is a military-run reset. A benign coup.
We're so far off the Constitutional reservation that Constitutional means just can't work anymore. It's over.
Posted by: Jaws at September 26, 2013 04:26 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: Mellow Yellow--that's right! at September 26, 2013 04:27 AM (V3kRK)
It's the same here. You always hear libtards talk about "all of the above" approach to energy, yet we have seen no new nuke plants in the US in decades.
Germany is our future folks.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 26, 2013 04:28 AM (AYOav)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at September 26, 2013 04:28 AM (659DL)
That being said, even at 16 hours a day what do you save? 70 watts times 16 hours = 1120W or about 7 cents worth here. Lighting is a miniscule load compared to stuff like your hot water heater and A/C.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 04:29 AM (zZbNF)
--
I think the major thrust, at least from Levin's interpretation, is that none of Congress is to be involved. It all resides at the state level.
Posted by: Lady in Black at September 26, 2013 04:29 AM (XB5Ak)
Germany is our future folks.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 26, 2013 08:28 AM (AYOav)
GA Power is building two new nukes at their Augusta site.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 04:30 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: nothinglefttolose at September 26, 2013 04:30 AM (r60DJ)
>>>Not to fuss too much, but I believe that may be easier than you think. The TP has been fairly effective in bypassing the national GOP by donating money directly to candidates. Look at the progress made in just a few short years. Social media and this Intarwebz thingy have helped a lot, along with talk radio.
Politely, and its final, but I have to disagree. The GOP brand is dogshit, really. Go ahead and take over the dogshit if you want, but it still stinks to those you want for votes. Its just bad strategy and the TP needs to stop wasting its time. Hell, I could easily make the case that the TP brand is dogshit, too.
If you need a different way to get it, think of how Liberals change names to Progressive and vice versa, and understand why they do it.
Posted by: Bigby's Dice-Rolling Hand at September 26, 2013 04:30 AM (3ZtZW)
We're so far off the Constitutional reservation that Constitutional means just can't work anymore. It's over.
Posted by: Jaws
...........
No thanks! There is nothing "benign" about a coup.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at September 26, 2013 04:30 AM (AYOav)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 04:30 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at September 26, 2013 04:31 AM (659DL)
Posted by: confused consumer at September 26, 2013 04:31 AM (F3WsD)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 04:32 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at September 26, 2013 04:32 AM (659DL)
Good luck to him. Ain't no way that'll be allowed to happen without infiltration. Some folks have too much power to lose and they will do anything- literally anything - to keep it.
Posted by: Jaws at September 26, 2013 04:32 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 26, 2013 04:32 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 04:33 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: steveegg at September 26, 2013 04:34 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at September 26, 2013 04:34 AM (659DL)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 04:34 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at September 26, 2013 04:34 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 04:35 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at September 26, 2013 04:35 AM (659DL)
NOW, we have a few conservatives in the House and Senate who can take the hands of the new folks and guide them.
It will be imperative, however, to clean house of the McCains or they will continue to take the juniors under their wings and thoroughly eff them, and us, up.
If the new guys need an older statesman to look up to, perhaps a Sessions or Coburn will do the trick.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 08:20 AM (DmNpO)
This isn't accurate. There have always been "a few" conservatives in the Senate or House. If your assessment made any sense, or if it were that easy - just elect a few conservatives - we would be there already.
Plus, I like some of the "conservative" Senators, but where are they really on most of this stuff? And in the house, they all start changing tune as they move up the hierarchy - see Cantor and Ryan. As much as I like Rand and Cruz, the only reason that Rand and Cruz are bucking the party as much as they are right now is both have their eye on the presidential primary and want to corner the conservative base. Once that primary is over, both will move into the GOP mainstream.
The problem is twofold:
(1) the nature of politicians - most politicians, even ones that seem rock-ribbed conservative, care more about winning and staying in power than anything else. So, their principals are very malleable. And promising "free stuff" and an easy "middle road" where there are no sacrifices is much easier to do than to tell the truth and follow good policy. So, even the most conservative seeming politician is likely to fold once in office.
(2) the nature of the party. the party was not started as a conservative party (in the sense we have talked about American conservatism since about the 1960s). So, the party was not built up as a conservative party. And, like all political parties, the GOP does not exist to serve an ideological function. The GOP exists to perpetuate itself and keep its politicians in office and keep money flowing to its staffers, consultants, appointees, campaign professionals, etc. In order to change the GOP, we don't have to just elect conservative politicians, we have to get rid of:
(a) the big money donors who care more about business than conservatism - and big gov't is generally good for big business;
(b) the infrastructure of the party - the staffers, the aides, the consultants, the GOP leaning lobbyists, the campaign professionals and everyone else who makes up the professional GOP establishment. Those people - all those "anonymous" tipsters who hate conservatives and conservatism are always working against conservatism (because, in large part, point I above, but also because these people never had conservative principals - they are in it for the game aspects of it and the sense of status/power it gives them.
And, the same is true at every level. Local, county, state and Federal. The idea that we are going to change what the GOP is within the next 50 years is simply not reasonable. it is not going to happen. We may inch it right every 2 years during the election cycle, but it will always move back.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2013 04:35 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 26, 2013 04:35 AM (V3kRK)
Posted by: CarolT at September 26, 2013 04:37 AM (z4WKX)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 26, 2013 08:14 AM (JDIKC)
You should claim it for your empire, a gassy mud flat sounds perfect for a theater major.
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at September 26, 2013 04:37 AM (rXcBX)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 04:38 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at September 26, 2013 04:38 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at September 26, 2013 04:39 AM (659DL)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 04:39 AM (DmNpO)
I never said it was a great thing for our "republic" not that it would definitely turn out well. It's just that I put slightly more faith in our military cleaning house and resetting to a proper American federal government than I do our current ruling class. This slide toward oblivion cannot be stopped or reversed by anything less than drastic means at this point.
You may disagree, but my faith in the ballot box as it is currently constituted is officially gone.
Posted by: Jaws at September 26, 2013 04:40 AM (4I3Uo)
This is why my thoughts are so full of ugly shit. Rather than spend time thinking about how to right things, I've been thinking about how things got this way.
--
It's hard not to. How did we go from young ladies hoping to fill their dance cards to modern day young "ladies" thinking it's perfectly fine to broadcast, to all who will listen, about masturbating with a vibrator on the subway? We've fallen pretty far into the stinky, slimy sewer.
Posted by: Lady in Black at September 26, 2013 04:41 AM (XB5Ak)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at September 26, 2013 04:41 AM (JDIKC)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at September 26, 2013 04:41 AM (32Ze2)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at September 26, 2013 04:41 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 08:30 AM (zZbNF)
That is very good news.
What kind of design?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 26, 2013 04:42 AM (gqgiP)
Posted by: Jean at September 26, 2013 04:42 AM (CMlD4)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at September 26, 2013 04:42 AM (659DL)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 26, 2013 04:43 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Prisoner #15754 with Man-Boobs [/i] at September 26, 2013 04:43 AM (U2UQk)
Always with the "cooperative". What does this mean? How do you cooperate on issues where the other side (in this instance the GOP) wants to do something 100% in opposition to a core principal?
Or, if as is the case here, you quite reasonably don't trust the other side (again the GOP) because it has lied to you and failed you time and time again?
Here, the GOP wants the Tea Party to "Trust us, we know what were doing, we'll make you happy in the end" - when conservatives have heard that nonsense for 40 years and always got screwed.
People who use words like "cooperate" and "compromise" regularly don't seem to understand a) the meaning of those words or b) the context in which cooperation or compromise works. It does not work when parties disagree completely about a core issue. As an example, you can't compromise between having an abortion and not having an abortion. There is no middle ground. Adoption is not a compromise for the person who wants the abortion because it means they don't have the abortion. Likewise, the person who doesn't want an abortion can't "compromise" by having an abortion.
Yet people throw words like "cooperate" and "compromise" around all the time like they are magical wards. What they mean by those words is "shut up and do what we say".
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2013 04:43 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: ghostofhallelujah at September 26, 2013 04:44 AM (XvrTA)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 04:44 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: nothinglefttolose at September 26, 2013 04:46 AM (cWpCn)
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 08:30 AM (zZbNF)
That is very good news.
"What kind of design?"
IIRC, they're of the Horrifically Late and Massively Over Budget class of reactor.
Posted by: Jaws at September 26, 2013 04:47 AM (4I3Uo)
Chernoble or Three Mile Island types wouldn't be my guess. Saying that, I've no idea what I'm talking about, so ignore me.
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at September 26, 2013 04:47 AM (MnSla)
Posted by: Retread at September 26, 2013 04:47 AM (bZKG0)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 26, 2013 04:47 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 26, 2013 08:42 AM (gqgiP)
Westinghouse PWR similar to Votgle.
Posted by: Vic at September 26, 2013 04:48 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 04:48 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Jean at September 26, 2013 04:49 AM (CMlD4)
If you want to toss your theory out there as an "and this", that's one thing but, as of now, your argument is as full of personal opinion as is mine.
Don't agree with my supposition, then show me where the few "conservative" senators have been as aggressive in recruiting proteges as has McCain.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 08:44 AM (DmNpO)
Wow. You got me. You pointed out that my opinion is just that - an opinion. that stings. You win. Although, I guess I missed where I claimed otherwise. Hmmm, maybe your point isn't so clever after all. I guess not.
My point stands. You continue with your abused girlfriend rational that THIS TIME it'll work and we'll take over the GOP and make it conservative. I'll stick with my theory until proven wrong. I have serious doubts it will be. While past behavior doesn't always predict future outcomes, it is most likely that past behavior will be repeated.
Not to mention you completely ignore my other points, which are completely valid. I did point out that even if we elected some more conservatives it wouldn't change the party. But you stick to your dreams.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2013 04:50 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at September 26, 2013 04:50 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at September 26, 2013 04:50 AM (a4Omg)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at September 26, 2013 04:51 AM (U2UQk)
Bullshit. Next.
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at September 26, 2013 08:35 AM (659DL)
Pretty much. The annualized rate of nominal GDP growth dropped from 3.2% in the second estimate to 3.1%, but the implicit price deflator dropped from 0.7 points to 0.6 points to allow for an "unchanged" "real" GDP.
Posted by: steveegg at September 26, 2013 04:52 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at September 26, 2013 04:52 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: nothinglefttolose at September 26, 2013 04:54 AM (ma+gB)
Your implicit assumption is that the process corrupts 100%.
That's how you can say, " that even if we elected some more conservatives it wouldn't change the party."
But I and many others do not accept that premise. The fact is that principled conservatives do exist, and our job is to find them, vote for them, support them.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 26, 2013 04:54 AM (gqgiP)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at September 26, 2013 04:55 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: alexthechick - Booze. Not just for breakfast. at September 26, 2013 04:56 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at September 26, 2013 04:58 AM (a4Omg)
Blake's poem, "And Did Those Feet In Ancient Time," better known as "Jerusalem," is another great one.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 26, 2013 04:58 AM (gqgiP)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat at September 26, 2013 08:51 AM (U2UQk)
The media will find a way to protect itself, they always do.
Meanwhile, I have to keep an eye out on both sides. Our rates are likely to go up a lot (although our plan was already mostly compliant with Obamacare last year so I'm hoping that shields it against huge increases)
Any one of those amendments floating around could shut us to the exchanges anyway (which, like most places are lining up for "suck" since the largest providers aren't included in the insurance plans currently.)
Comps soon, and then I need to quickly find a job so my wife can fall back to my healthcare plan, here's has always been just shy of sucking and it's about to get worse.
Posted by: tsrblke, actual real life PhD student at September 26, 2013 04:58 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Lord Salisbury at September 26, 2013 04:59 AM (hNNJ5)
Posted by: delayna at September 26, 2013 05:00 AM (KnC4k)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 26, 2013 05:00 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at September 26, 2013 05:01 AM (MnSla)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 05:01 AM (DmNpO)
“The
responsibility of Congress to pay the bills of the United States, bills
that Congress has incurred, is not a subject of negotiation,” White
House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters yesterday.
---
You'd think Boehner , McLame McDonell would get this.
They keep bending US over for This administrations fiscal recklessness "to be helpful' every budget for years. And they get the blame for Obama's spending with laughable 'negotiations' or His unwillingness to compromise. srsly we have watched it every year ! Republicans this time we will fight, wait, we will fight this way. ok we will bend a little and get it through this way later. oh well ok He got what he wanted but we rescued 4 billion from that trillion +.
Duh
Posted by: willow at September 26, 2013 05:01 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 26, 2013 05:02 AM (MhA4j)
we still have heat. It doesn't circulate as efficiently, but it does eventually go up.
Not down here, it doesn't.
Posted by: Under the Sea at September 26, 2013 05:02 AM (5ywfe)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at September 26, 2013 05:02 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 05:02 AM (DmNpO)
That's how you can say, " that even if we elected some more conservatives it wouldn't change the party."
But I and many others do not accept that premise. The fact is that principled conservatives do exist, and our job is to find them, vote for them, support them.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 26, 2013 08:54 AM (gqgiP)
Talk about missing the point and reading into things. I don't claim that the process corrupts 100% - but it corrupts a lot. Do you dispute that?
I also claim most politicians are of the sort whose principals are malleable. Do you dispute this?
I also claim that the party itself is much more than just elected officials - it is the party professionals - the fundraisers, consultants, aides, staffers and the like. Do you dispute this?
Do you dispute that many "solid conservatives" once elected have moved left and disappointed conservatives?
Plus, you need to replace all of the non-ideological, party first, win at all costs the easiest way possible party professionals that make up the GOP. Do you dispute that?
then you need to get rid of the big money GOP donors who are not remotely conservative. Do you dispute that?
And
- you have to do all of the above while being fought tooth and nail by
elected GOP non-conservatives, the big-money donors, and the current
party professionals - do you dispute that?
I also never said there is no such thing as a principled conservative who once elected will stand tall and fight against the party and stick to conservatism.
the problem you are ignoring is that you need to find at least 26-30 of those people and get them elected to the Senate as republicans to change the GOP Senate Caucus. then you need to find about 150 and elect them to the house. What are the odds of that?
My assumptions are based on facts and historical evidence. Your dream of the future is based on no evidence and hope. I wish it were as easy as you claim.
We have been trying to take over the party for more than 20 years. We haven't done it and haven't really even moved the party much to the right. At this rate, it'll be another 100 years before we can call the GOP conservative. I don't dispute that it could happen. I dispute that it can happen in my lifetime.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2013 05:02 AM (sOx93)
responsibility of Congress to pay the bills of the United States, bills
that Congress has incurred
LOL
fcol.
Posted by: willow at September 26, 2013 05:03 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: alexthechick - Booze. Not just for breakfast. at September 26, 2013 08:56 AM (VtjlW)
What really amazes me is their perseverance.
I stopped giving money to the national organizations a long time ago, but they persist in sending me letter after letter, and calling me rather frequently -- assuming that i will eventually return to the fold and resume funding their idiocy.
They ignored my letters that made explicit statements such as, "I will never again send you one more penny."
You have to give them credit for stick-to-it-ivness.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 26, 2013 05:03 AM (gqgiP)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 26, 2013 09:00 AM (LSJmV)
I think the key is getting rid of the old guard.
Posted by: Red Shirt at September 26, 2013 05:03 AM (FIDMq)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 05:04 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at September 26, 2013 05:04 AM (a4Omg)
Except for when it comes to principles or things that matter.
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at September 26, 2013 05:05 AM (MnSla)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at September 26, 2013 05:05 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 05:05 AM (DmNpO)
How in the world can you agree 1000% AND think we're too far gone for it to work?
Posted by: Jaws at September 26, 2013 05:05 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 26, 2013 05:05 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 26, 2013 05:06 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2013 09:02 AM (sOx93)
I made no such claim.
Obviously it is an immensely difficult undertaking, but the possibility exists, just as it did in the 1970s.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 26, 2013 05:06 AM (gqgiP)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 26, 2013 05:07 AM (MhA4j)
Wow! I forgot about ELP's version.
Off to the internet.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 26, 2013 05:07 AM (gqgiP)
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2013 09:02 AM (sOx93)
And this is why I advocate starving the beast (GOP). Starve it of small donor contributions, activists/volunteers, and votes.
then, either build up a more conservative party from its ashes or enter the ensuing vacuum with a more conservative third party.
It think that will result much more quickly in an actual conservative party that is competitive than the tactic of trying to transform the GOP into a conservative party one election at a time.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2013 05:07 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: mindful webworker - lurking socking ducking rocking at September 26, 2013 05:07 AM (Bfbpz)
even Rubio has redeemed himself a bit.
Posted by: Jeffrey Pelt at September 26, 2013 05:07 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: alexthechick - Booze. Not just for breakfast. at September 26, 2013 05:08 AM (VtjlW)
Since, a long way upthread, I mentioned the actress Seena Owen (a phonetic spelling of her birth name, Signe Auen), here's a still of her:
http://tinyurl.com/q4xnhxz
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at September 26, 2013 05:09 AM (zF6Iw)
"240 Can someone explain how "ballooning spiders" rates multiple news stories? I mean they've been doing this forever and now it's news? I first learned about them in grade school when I read Charlotte's Web"
The skwerls have unionized and demand a break.
Posted by: Cicero Kid at September 26, 2013 05:09 AM (DHQv9)
Posted by: CarolT at September 26, 2013 05:10 AM (z4WKX)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 05:10 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: maddogg at September 26, 2013 05:10 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at September 26, 2013 05:10 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Jeffrey Pelt at September 26, 2013 09:07 AM (Jsiw/)
Does he have a choice after Shamnesty?
Posted by: Red Shirt at September 26, 2013 05:10 AM (FIDMq)
Oh, I think that the animating principle of getting more power and money really matters to them.
Posted by: alexthechick - Booze. Not just for breakfast. at September 26, 2013 09:08 AM (VtjlW)
The money and the power.
The power and the money.
Stick it in my pocket,
And I'll take it to the laundry.
Posted by: Algore Goracle (as voiced by Paul Shanklin) at September 26, 2013 05:10 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Countrysquire at September 26, 2013 05:10 AM (LSJmV)
Ha! And since soy is supposed to mimic estrogen in the body, it may have other positive effects.
Posted by: typo dynamofo at September 26, 2013 05:11 AM (URNUb)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 05:11 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: steveegg at September 26, 2013 05:11 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 05:12 AM (WjLUf)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 09:05 AM (DmNpO)
Just one more example of a party that is hopelessly mired in outdated ideas, assumptions, technology, etc.
After hearing what you and I say, they should direct our accounts to another kind of caller. Someone who would say all of the right things.
But they can't even do that.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 26, 2013 05:12 AM (gqgiP)
Posted by: steveegg at September 26, 2013 05:12 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 26, 2013 09:06 AM (gqgiP)
Anything is possible. The question is, what is probable? I agree that it is possible to transform the GOP into a conservative party. I disagree that it will happen quickly enough to make a difference.
Replacing the politicians is, more or less, the easy part. It is replacing everyone else that makes up the party establishment that is incredibly difficult. There are no elections for adviser, fundraiser, aide, staffer, press person, speechwriter, donor, consultant, campaign manager, etc. How do we get rid of them? They are entrenched.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2013 05:12 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: Chilling the most at September 26, 2013 05:13 AM (Rn9xc)
Posted by: Diogenes'Lamp at September 26, 2013 05:13 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 05:13 AM (WjLUf)
Ah...Mr. Sefton. Please pull your pants and underwear down.
Oh. A Jew.
Please step to the right for the delousing showers.
Posted by: Obama's Brave New World at September 26, 2013 05:14 AM (gqgiP)
In an interview on the "Tom Joyner Morning Show," Lemon lamented the "willful misinformation" being shopped about Obamacare by both Democrats and Republicans — but really mostly by Republicans."
Well if anyone would know about willful misinformation it would be a douche from CNN
Posted by: TheQuietMan at September 26, 2013 05:14 AM (1Jaio)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 26, 2013 05:14 AM (V3kRK)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 05:14 AM (DmNpO)
Finally realized is right.
Posted by: Diogenes'Lamp at September 26, 2013 09:13 AM (bb5+k)
Only if there's Hell to pay. I've never seen any evidence the right-of-center crowd will make that stick.
Posted by: steveegg at September 26, 2013 05:14 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 09:01 AM (DmNpO)
Eh? Intrusive from the insurance company is how much of an issue though?
They're going to know PDQ what you're health is. Provided there's no risk of higher premiums I'd think it's a fairly safe bet to fill it out.
Speaking of costs.
So remember by field for a moment (Healthcare Ethics). Now, I'm having a discussion with a former student turned faculty (that part is less important, just know that for the most part, I lock people into the context in which I first meet them, so we were fellow students, and even now that she's faculty, I treat her as I did 6 months prior.)
So anyway, her and her husband just got on the university health plan (which I used to be on when I was an employee there, but it's changed significantly). The university now has a High Deductible plan. I guess the costs have gone up significantly (seriously in 2007, health insurance was literally a rounding error on my paycheck. $10/pay period, which doubled to $20 in 2008, oh the humanity!)
So anyway, Little Miss Professor and her husband are still trying to figure out the ins and outs of a HD plan. But clearly no jack crap about...well economics.
So, her husband gets mildly sick (and by mildly sick, I mean just that, I think it was a stomach flu, sinus infection? Something fairly routine.) They decide to go to the doctor to get some pills (or something).
They go to the urgent care center to do so though. Now the context in which she's telling me this story is unrelated to medicine itself (apparently a crazy person showed up at Urgent care, scared them all blah blah blah.)
So I go "Why were you at an urgent care center anyway? Why not just wait until morning and see your PCP?"
Her response: "Well we're new to this plan and didn't know what would be cheaper. Turns out that's not urgent care"
My response: "did you ever wonder why urgent care had a higher co-pay on your old insurance? Or for that matter, why would urgent care, with it's greater hours, be cheaper?"
So, just remember that folks, the people who are supposed "experts" know jack crap about this shit. (I suppose to be fair she's a clinical ethicist, but still I mean FFS, know something.)
(BTW, the department chair specifically excluded her from my comps committee noting "it would be weird for someone you were a student with to be grading you now" to which I responded "plus I still treat her like a student so it wouldn't end well.")
Posted by: tsrblke, actual real life PhD student at September 26, 2013 05:15 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at September 26, 2013 05:15 AM (MnSla)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 26, 2013 05:15 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at September 26, 2013 05:15 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2013 09:12 AM (sOx93)
And, to follow up on that point, those people have far more power than people generally think regarding what the elected officials ultimately do. They have power over who gets well funded in a campaign. They have power over grooming and picking candidates. They have power over party rules and the party platform. They have power over all kinds of behind the scenes things that are little cared about by most people.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2013 05:15 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at September 26, 2013 05:15 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at September 26, 2013 09:13 AM (WjLUf)
Agreed, once they go down the rabbit hole, not sure if they are trustworthy. McCain usually gets pretty conservative around election time.
Posted by: Red Shirt at September 26, 2013 05:16 AM (FIDMq)
Posted by: mindful webworker - Lifetime USA member at September 26, 2013 05:17 AM (Ynbgq)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at September 26, 2013 05:17 AM (5H6zj)
McCain's sycophant staffers on twitter citing this as a "must read" article.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 09:14 AM (DmNpO)
ReWrite™ engaged for accuracy - do you think he actually types anything out?
Posted by: steveegg at September 26, 2013 05:17 AM (o44nj)
Posted by: Diogenes'Lamp at September 26, 2013 05:18 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 26, 2013 05:18 AM (V3kRK)
Posted by: fluffy at September 26, 2013 05:18 AM (z9HTb)
Posted by: fluffy at September 26, 2013 09:18 AM (z9HTb)
Gravity: It's not just a good idea; it's the law!
Posted by: Obama's Brave New World at September 26, 2013 05:19 AM (gqgiP)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 05:20 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Hrothgar at September 26, 2013 05:20 AM (XdnQT)
This is a point I have been trying to make. Anyone who makes a career out of gov't (whether by being a party professional or a career aid, staffer) is likely to believe in gov't much, much more than we as conservatives do.
And, anyone who makes a career out of being a politician, is going to trend that way as well. After all, their career is gov't, so it would be human nature to start to believe that gov't can and should solve all our problems.
Conservatism - believing in limited gov't - is a hard ideology to have in gov't service or as a professional politician. Which is why very few people with strong conservative beliefs go make full careers out of gov't. And also why it is hard to find conservative candidates who actually believe what they say and stick to it.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at September 26, 2013 05:20 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 05:21 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Buzzy the Caffeinated at September 26, 2013 05:21 AM (Ynbgq)
It's a plodding system that is designed for a different time.
But as long as the party hierarchy goes to good cocktail parties and gets to bang cute interns, all's right in the world.
This, in microcosm, is why we lost in 2012.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at September 26, 2013 05:23 AM (gqgiP)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 05:23 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Hrothgar at September 26, 2013 05:23 AM (XdnQT)
Posted by: alexthechick - Booze. Not just for breakfast. at September 26, 2013 05:23 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 05:24 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at September 26, 2013 05:25 AM (a4Omg)
Posted by: Diogenes'Lamp at September 26, 2013 05:26 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Jesse Pinkman at September 26, 2013 05:26 AM (T0Pku)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 05:26 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: FRONT TOWARD LEFT at September 26, 2013 05:28 AM (V3kRK)
Posted by: Jones in CO at September 26, 2013 05:28 AM (8sCoq)
Of course they think that's a good, helpful thing to do.
I would argue that they think it is the 'easy' thing to do.
Which might explain why the Government excels at nothing except graft, fraud and waste.
Posted by: garrett at September 26, 2013 05:28 AM (5ywfe)
Posted by: Diogenes'Lamp at September 26, 2013 05:29 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: garrett at September 26, 2013 05:29 AM (5ywfe)
Posted by: knowledge is power at September 26, 2013 05:29 AM (Nx76m)
Posted by: Fritz at September 26, 2013 05:29 AM (x2W/k)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 05:32 AM (DmNpO)
What's the point of going to a strip club where they've sworn off meat? How does this business model work?
Not serving roast beef sandwiches, stage-side, will probably cut down rates on their liability coverage.
Posted by: garrett at September 26, 2013 05:33 AM (5ywfe)
>>>But I and many others do not accept that premise. The fact is that principled conservatives do exist, and our job is to find them, vote for them, support them.
Wonderful. How are you going to deal with "I don't like what the Democrats are doing but I'm not going to do anything crazy like vote Republican"?
Even if you successfully change the party you still have to convince the voters, and I submit that you cannot. You can follow Reagan's advice from 30 years ago and fervently believe he wouldn't change tactics if you want.
Posted by: Bigby's Dice-Rolling Hand at September 26, 2013 05:35 AM (3ZtZW)
Wouldn't just letting the Dems raise their taxes get the moneyed elites back on our side?
Sure, raise Buffett's taxes. No skin off my ass. He's a crooked SOB anyway.
Posted by: Invictus at September 26, 2013 05:36 AM (FBkKA)
Just get rid of it. Forget we ever said it.
The Socialists have been using that term against us for about a century. We should stop giving them the ammunition.
In practice (in the popular mind), "self-reliant" means all sorts of bad things, from "let them eat cake" to "beat back the marauding mud people."
It's a bad term. It doesn't express who we really are and what we want.
What we really want is economic liberty. Americans are immensely charitable. Successful businesses give away huge sums. Struggling ones don't.
Conservatives do not want to be self-reliant. Not really. We want to be mutually cooperative. We want to trade and interact and be sociable and have conviviality and all the rest. "Self-reliant" sounds like a grumpy old dude who lives alone grousing about "the darkies."
We want to interact, and be mutually reliant, but on free, voluntary and reciprocal terms.
We want to be free from coercion.
Posted by: Phinn at September 26, 2013 05:37 AM (oFH2D)
Posted by: 'Ette in training, a striving wannabe at September 26, 2013 05:39 AM (zvxqj)
Mz Rubin's commenters are what i would have read at kos , and they are pleased to also agree with Rubin about what neanderthal's conservatives are . Of course i expect that from Them. Not our own side!
I guess this is why somehow finding new voters to vote for Them (hahahaha) amnesty will assist them in their struggle to remain a significant loyal adversary and keep 2 parties to 'balance' (hahahaha) .
Can i have McCain or Boehner actually voice what Republican thought is? What are their actual goals?
What do they believe a America should look like?
I really want it stated openly because I'm not feeling such an infinity for this party or if i actually should be a member .
It's unfortunate that i see Cruz (an actual possible representative for us )attempt to school the average american on consequence and see those that actually hold power on our side LAUGH , Heckle and jeer.
anyway i realize i a m but one family and maybe that doesn't mean much to McCain, , Boehner , or the McDonells.
But srsly what are They going to do if they keep throwing rocks at people like me?
hope this made sense.
Posted by: willow at September 26, 2013 05:43 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: The Blog at September 26, 2013 05:46 AM (Ynbgq)
Posted by: cajun caret at September 26, 2013 05:53 AM (UZQM8)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 26, 2013 05:54 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at September 26, 2013 05:55 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 26, 2013 05:56 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: ChicagoRefugee,what supports Sam Clovis, Iowa Senate candidate who StandsWithCruz! at September 26, 2013 06:16 AM (jevZa)
Posted by: Buckeye Katie at September 26, 2013 06:20 AM (1M/xn)
Posted by: BornLib at September 26, 2013 06:31 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: occam at September 26, 2013 06:33 AM (J20dn)
Posted by: panzernashorn at September 26, 2013 06:39 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Jesse Pinkman at September 26, 2013 06:59 AM (T0Pku)
"Florida town shortening red lights"
Was it Waldo?
(Setting up the obvious punchline)
But seriously, in name, to answer your question.
Posted by: Beagle at September 26, 2013 07:30 AM (sOtz/)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3242 seconds, 476 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Joethefatman™ (@joethefatman1) at September 26, 2013 02:37 AM (MnSla)