April 15, 2013
— DrewM I blogged about Sen. Ron JohnsonÂ’s “Victims of Government” when the project was first announced. IÂ’m returning to it for two reasons:
1. ItÂ’s one of the few good ideas actually coming out of the GOP these days
2. I had the chance to speak with Sen. Johnson about it and other things last week. Due to some technical problems, I canÂ’t post the audio but I wanted to relay the gist of the conversation.
One good bit of news…Johnson gets it. He’s really the embodiment of the “citizen legislator” spirit of 2010. Having spent most of his life building a business and making payrolls he sees the federal government from a different perspective than a professional politician. Instead of taking about the DOOM! of the sequester he spoke about it being a chance for people to understand the sky won't fall if the government spends a little less than it planed to.
Something else Johnson gets that not enough Republicans seem to these daysÂ…the way people consume information has changed. HeÂ’s big on the power of video and keeping messages short and powerful. ItÂ’s one thing to say that but itÂ’s another to do it.
A lot of conservatives object to Obama’s use of “human props” at his events and raw appeals to emotions. Well, they work. Changing people’s minds usually beings with changing their heart. People react better to other people than they do to abstract concepts.
Think back to the presidential campaign and how many times Republicans railed against Dodd-Frank. But how many times did they show a concrete example of the bad out comes from it or a “real person” hurt by them.
“Victims” is a strong word. It’s one we tend to shy away from but the left uses it all the time. I’m glad Johnson uses it here. Not having things go your way all the time or not being as successful as someone else doesn’t make you a “victim”. Having an arbitrary and extremely powerful government crush you certainly can qualify you as a victim.
Johnson didnÂ’t want to get into details about the submissions they are getting for the project saying they need to be vetted (and he wants to make sure the people are helped and not just used as part of the campaign) but if they pan out he says weÂ’ll be in for some real horror stories.
IÂ’ve liked Johnson for a long time and getting to chat with him did nothing to change that. But being the glass half-empty guy that I am, I am worried that heÂ’s one of the few guys worth supporting. The real problem is that there may not be many more on the way. I asked him about the adjustment from private citizen to Senator and he admitted itÂ’s rough to give up your privacy and take stage like this. I couldnÂ’t help but think of Bruce Carroll and wonder if there will ever be enough Ron JohnsonÂ’s to really matter.
If you havenÂ’t already, take a look at the video below. Share it with friends and family even if, especially if, they arenÂ’t very political. And if you have a story to share, visit the Victims of Government site and let them know about it.
Posted by: DrewM at
08:33 AM
| Comments (69)
Post contains 553 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Kitty Frontage, previously known as Jess1 at April 15, 2013 07:32 AM (lbiWb)
I'm a victim of government.
20% of this office is composed of mental defectives who can't be fired.
Halp me Rawn Johnson!
Posted by: Sean Bannion at April 15, 2013 07:34 AM (4tmHG)
Posted by: Mr. Pink at April 15, 2013 08:39 AM (++kZl)
I have to agree...as much as it pains me.
I was going to start a small company, making one simple food product and distributing it and another from a different producer.
The maze of paperwork, licenses, inspections, infrastructure demands and restrictions, all from government, made me realize that it just wouldn't pay.
So some high school kid isn't going to get an entry-level job doing some grunt work, and the wheels of the economy will slow just a little bit more.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 15, 2013 08:40 AM (/WLC3)
Looks like Drew fianlly found a guy named Johnson who isn't a flamimg cocksucking, motherfucking, shit eating, maggot infested, bag of grease shitball.
Posted by: maddogg at April 15, 2013 08:45 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: maddogg at April 15, 2013 08:47 AM (OlN4e)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 15, 2013 08:48 AM (HVff2)
Posted by: Sigourney Weaver at April 15, 2013 08:49 AM (ypzqs)
Posted by: Black Families at April 15, 2013 08:49 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Serious Cat at April 15, 2013 08:49 AM (UypUQ)
Funny, but Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer are my senators and I don't feel any bias at all.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 15, 2013 08:50 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: soothsayer at April 15, 2013 08:51 AM (BUcLz)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 15, 2013 08:53 AM (HVff2)
Posted by: soothsayer at April 15, 2013 08:53 AM (yhYn1)
People really need to stop looking at their smartphones while driving. My desk has a view overlooking a parking lot and it is disconcerting how often I spot a driver going by with her eyes glancing up and down from their lap and the road.
Posted by: Serious Cat at April 15, 2013 08:55 AM (UypUQ)
I'm certain that the election of Barbara Boxer was engineered by Feinstein because Feinstein was afraid people would eventually realize that she's a fucking retard, and Boxer makes her look wise by comparison.
The ploy appears to have worked.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 15, 2013 08:56 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, very old maid at April 15, 2013 08:57 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: fluffy at April 15, 2013 08:57 AM (z9HTb)
Posted by: Lord Barky at April 15, 2013 09:00 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Serious Cat at April 15, 2013 12:55 PM (UypUQ)
I don't know how ANYONE can use their phones while driving, especially for texting. That makes zero sense to me. Even when i have to make a call while driving somewhere I always try to wait till I'm at a red light or a stop sign, or else I pull off the road into a parking lot or a turnaround. There are just too many variables to account for while driving without compounding them by not paying attention.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 15, 2013 09:01 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Your boss at April 15, 2013 09:02 AM (8sCoq)
Not having things go your way all the time or not being as successful as someone else doesn’t make you a “victim”. Having an arbitrary and extremely powerful government crush you certainly can qualify you as a victim.
This. I hate the term "victim" with a white hot, burning intensity because it is so often misused and inappropriately applied. When someone is a sympathy-whoring clod, he or she is NOT a victim. When someone is a TRUE victim, you can tell. I get offended on behalf of the latter when I see someone demonstrating the former.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 15, 2013 09:04 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 15, 2013 12:40 PM (/WLC3
Start ur business anyway. Just call it an abortion clinic. Less paperwork and no inspections.
Posted by: Cicero Kid at April 15, 2013 09:05 AM (026j9)
Take for example the new ACA reg that mandates any food chain with 20 or more locations to get the calorie content of everything on the menu tested and listed. We can all understand how this adds cost to the product, makes chains less likely to experiment with new recipes, and discourages chains under the threshold of 20 stores from opening additional locations. But for the average LIV, only the most modest, mom-and-pop, operator gets any sympathy. Anyone company with 20+ stores is considered "rich" and "not-people like me".
Posted by: Serious Cat at April 15, 2013 09:05 AM (UypUQ)
Posted by: t-bird at April 15, 2013 09:06 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 15, 2013 12:40 PM (/WLC3)
This! The amount of beauracracy I'd have to deal with to simply have the potential to *find out* if I can make money at what I do means I'm not going to deal with the headache and the general economy gets a little less grease. We're not unique. I'm sure there are *millions* of people who are forgoing the chance at being the "next big thing" because the current costs wildly outweigh all but the highest potential gain.
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette, assault Hobbit at April 15, 2013 09:06 AM (wbeNt)
I don't know how ANYONE can use their phones while driving
I can text while rolling a smoke and driving.
Some people are just better at multi-tasking, I guess.
Honestly, though, I can't text on a smart phone while sitting on my couch...so there is that to consider.
Posted by: garrett at April 15, 2013 09:07 AM (sOX+X)
every stupid reg has an opportunity cost in compliance protocols and introduces disequilibrium in cost/benefit analysis...
we'd never have had powered flight in today's cimate
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at April 15, 2013 09:08 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Tea. at April 15, 2013 09:08 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit at April 15, 2013 01:01 PM (4df7R)
Did you get the directions for joining the Ravelry group that I left on the other thread MWR?
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette, assault Hobbit at April 15, 2013 09:08 AM (wbeNt)
Posted by: Curly Howard at April 15, 2013 09:09 AM (BAS5M)
He does not find it nearly as hilarious as I do that the paperwork and regulations required to start a consulting firm to help companies deal with paperwork and regulations is so onerous as to make it nearly impossible for him to start such a company.
You're welcome.
Posted by: The Government at April 15, 2013 09:09 AM (sOX+X)
Any phone while driving.<<<<
.
11,00 deaths attributed to texting while driving in 2011. If memory serves that is roughly 3 times the deaths "caused" by rifles of any sort.
Ban texting.
Posted by: Javems at April 15, 2013 09:10 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Serious Cat at April 15, 2013 01:05 PM (UypUQ)
In that case, I think the problem lies with identifying the victimIZER, rather than the victim. It's very hard to see, say, McDonald's as a victim, even though that's what they are in the case of government overreach. In that situation, to give the LIVs a personal story to which they can relate, you have to look at the employees who will lose their jobs, or who will never GET a job, and say, "Who is victimizing these people? It's not McDonald's -- they're doing what they have to do to stay in compliance. It's the government that is forcing mcDonald's to comply with these stifling regulations that is the REAL villain here. It's the GOVERNMENT that's keeping Sam from getting a job. McDonald's wants to give him a job; they want him to be their manager in Hoboken. But because of these government regulations, they can't open their new location. "
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 15, 2013 09:11 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: t-bird at April 15, 2013 01:06 PM (FcR7P)
Seconded!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 15, 2013 09:12 AM (4df7R)
>>11,00 deaths attributed to texting while driving in 2011.
How many attributed to French Fries? Burgers? Beverages? Applying make-up? CD's/Radios? Road-Head?
Posted by: garrett at April 15, 2013 09:12 AM (sOX+X)
Posted by: Your boss at April 15, 2013 01:02 PM (8sCoq)
I'm not day dreaming, I'm Aceing it.
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 15, 2013 09:13 AM (HVff2)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 15, 2013 09:14 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at April 15, 2013 01:08 PM (LRFds)
Exactly.
He does not find it nearly as hilarious as I do that the paperwork and regulations required to start a consulting firm to help companies deal with paperwork and regulations is so onerous as to make it nearly impossible for him to start such a company.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Tea. at April 15, 2013 01:08 PM (VtjlW)
It's truly insane isn't it? And all that paperwork has to be paid for before a person even gets a chance to find out if they can make a go of their business. It's why micro-loans don't work in the US. The paperwork eats up the starting capital before there's ever a *start*.
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette, assault Hobbit at April 15, 2013 09:15 AM (wbeNt)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit at April 15, 2013 01:04 PM (4df7R)
-----------------------------------------------
"Victim" is just another word the marxists have hijacked. It'll never be publically (or politically) used as Johnson or Ace would like it to be used. It's meaning has completely changed in our national lexicon.
The only victims are minorities, gays, women, etc. If you're white, Christian, or own a gun, you'll never be able to claim victimhood.
Posted by: Soona at April 15, 2013 09:15 AM (iaqtw)
Posted by: Killer Beavers at April 15, 2013 09:16 AM (fMiHM)
>>>>>>.50
>>11,00 deaths attributed to texting while driving in 2011.
How many attributed to French Fries? Burgers? Beverages? Applying make-up? CD's/Radios? Road-Head<<<<<<<
.
I drove a truck for about 5 years, over the road. Saw one case of road-head. A lot more folks took things into their own hands however.
Posted by: Javems at April 15, 2013 09:18 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit at April 15, 2013 01:14 PM (4df7R)
Stupid work
. I'll be looking for you this evening then.
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette, assault Hobbit at April 15, 2013 09:18 AM (wbeNt)
The only victims are minorities, gays, women, etc. If you're white, Christian, or own a gun, you'll never be able to claim victimhood.
Posted by: Soona at April 15, 2013 01:15 PM (iaqtw)
O FUCK, thats me.
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 15, 2013 09:18 AM (HVff2)
the good news is that your grandkids post collapse will have one hell of a planet to start over on...
the bad news is your kids may want to eat your kids as joey Plugz says "literally."
We deserve everything we're gonna get.
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at April 15, 2013 09:19 AM (LRFds)
Posted by: Killer Beavers at April 15, 2013 09:20 AM (fMiHM)
Posted by: Brother Cavil Presents: Beaver vs Ampersand at April 15, 2013 09:20 AM (fMiHM)
Posted by: Ma Bell at April 15, 2013 09:22 AM (RLdcX)
Posted by: sven10077@sven10077 at April 15, 2013 01:19 PM (LRFds)
The sad thing is 2 are in college yet. One is out and makes a good living in the medical field. The 2 in college have no idea what they want to be. I keep telling them the med field or go to Tech School and learn a trade. But what would I know? I'm just a "guy". Oh well, it will be interesting.
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 15, 2013 09:23 AM (HVff2)
The highly distributed income model is the way to go.
Selling bullshit trinkets like phone/tablet apps for $1. No paperwork, you can do it from home, and the government isn't bothering to track these micro-payments...
...yet.
Posted by: @PurpAv at April 15, 2013 09:24 AM (/gHaE)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit at April 15, 2013 01:01 PM (4df7R)
Maybe it's the way guys multi-task, but I had no problem prioritizing driving over talking on the cell. Then again, as a guy, the reason I'd be answering the phone is just to tell the other person, "I'm on my way - *click*".
Posted by: ConservativeMonster at April 15, 2013 09:24 AM (v3pYe)
Posted by: @PurpAv at April 15, 2013 09:26 AM (/gHaE)
Posted by: Socratease at April 15, 2013 09:32 AM (3V4IJ)
Posted by: mtwzzyzx at April 15, 2013 07:59 PM (onTvA)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2099 seconds, 197 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Fourth Virginia at April 15, 2013 07:31 AM (wbmaj)