May 08, 2013
— Ace A good reporter.
What's interesting is that the Washington Post suggests she's a tool of the right because she follows stories the right is interested in.
The Washington Post doesn't say this out of its own mouth, but it does ask the question, by noting she's a "Rorschach test" viewed differently by the right and the left.
If Atkisson's a tool of the right because she follows stories featuring liberal villains, what does this line of reasoning suggest about the entirety of the liberal media? Whoops, I gave away the answer in the question.
Note that Atkisson offers the standard media response to the charge of bias -- she just goes where the story is, without prejudice or favor. Atkisson does indeed go where stories are -- even if the rest of the media has embargoed them.
Does this mean she's "partisan"? Why? Because she means it when she says she'll go wherever a story takes her, and the rest of the media most emphatically does not?
Liberals see a partisan tool. “I think Attkisson has completely given herself over to the right and is very happy to be their champion,” says Eric Boehlert, a senior fellow at the liberal Media Matters for America organization.Attkisson, 52, sees neither. She says she bears no partisan grud-
ges, not on the Benghazi story or another in which her reporting nettled Obama administration officials — the Justice Department’s problem-plagued gun-tracking operation, known as Fast and Furious (for which Attkisson won an Emmy for investigative reporting).“I’m a political agnostic,” she says. “I don’t think about who’s good and who’s bad. I just go where the story leads. . . . People can say what they want about me, I don’t care. I just want to get the information out there.”
But Attkisson, who holds a third-degree black belt in taekwondo, takes a fighting stance when she feels sheÂ’s being stonewalled. Which is exactly what she thinks the White House has done to her on Benghazi.
Liberals seem not to believe her claim to be a "political agnostic." Strangely enough, liberals themselves often say exactly this about themselves.
What is it about this statement that they find difficult to believe? Do they know something about the typical reporter who claims it which causes them to have skepticism about it?
Do they know they themselves are lying when they say it?
...Attkisson’s general approach to her work may be spelled out in the self-description on her Twitter account: “Investigative Journalist. Dreaming of a day when public officials answer questions as if they know they work for the public.”
I suppose to the media, the Public Relations Office of the Government, that seems like a partisan remark.
The article is worth a read, as it notes the angry pushback she gets from the White House, with taxpayer-paid government officials calling CBS to complain about her. But:
. “My goal is to report on untouchable subjects in a way that is fearless.”
Posted by: Ace at
06:59 AM
| Comments (196)
Post contains 505 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: t-bird at May 08, 2013 07:02 AM (FcR7P)
This is exactly what every reporter is supposed to do and almost none actually do
Posted by: Vic at May 08, 2013 07:02 AM (53z96)
I'm surprised she hasn't been fired, or demoted, or sent to work at some tiny CBS outpost in Alaska.
Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius at May 08, 2013 07:02 AM (BDU/a)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 08, 2013 07:02 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs to skip the beer and go straight to tequila at May 08, 2013 07:03 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius at May 08, 2013 11:02 AM (BDU/a)
I think her contract was not renewed. I expect to see her on Fox in the near future.
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 08, 2013 07:03 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Megan McCain, Supreme Intellectual at May 08, 2013 07:03 AM (JQuNB)
There are no untouchable or taboo subjects if you are a reporter. Who, What, When, Where, and How. Why was added later by the warm and fuzzy liberal class.
If you report the facts, the truth, why should you have to be considered fearless in a country with the Constitution and the Bill of Rights?
Posted by: Caustic at May 08, 2013 07:04 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: ace at May 08, 2013 07:04 AM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius at May 08, 2013 11:02 AM (BDU/a)
-----
Werd.
We need more help tearing thru Palins stuff.
We cant find shit and we need the help.
Posted by: THE MFM at May 08, 2013 07:05 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: jeannebodine at May 08, 2013 07:05 AM (LBBS3)
WaPo doing a profile on her? Yuck. This is merely them sticking a target on her so she can be new enemy number one of the left. "She's fair game, boys!"
Posted by: Lee in KY at May 08, 2013 07:05 AM (jgXna)
Posted by: Y-not on the phone at May 08, 2013 07:06 AM (5H6zj)
Posted by: Tom Hanks, The Most Trusted Man in the World at May 08, 2013 07:06 AM (JQuNB)
or dead teenage mexicans killed because of fast and furious and guns being given to drug cartels BY the Govt?
do they actually give a damn about anything, other than Team Progressive?
So i'm being clearly told , That all their concern about blood for oil, and illegal wars was nothing but political claptrap?
well i guess the answer is yes, Because as we see they no longer care about war or dead, or military dead, or brown folks dead.
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2013 07:07 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at May 08, 2013 07:07 AM (VtjlW)
> that seems like a partisan remark.
Please. Unless you lived in another universe in the 1981-1992 and 2001-2008 periods you shouldn't be referring to them as a government dept. Heck, NPR [IS] a government agency (basically) and was an outright partisan in those periods. Call em what they are, a totally unified part of The Party. And we all know what I mean by 'The Party' or do I have to spell it out?
Posted by: John Morris at May 08, 2013 07:08 AM (YhRJW)
What is it about this statement that they find difficult to believe? Do they know something about the typical reporter who claims it which causes them to have skepticism about it?
Do they know they themselves are lying when they say it?
***
Yes, they really do think that we are that stupid and the LIVs are.
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 08, 2013 07:08 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Baldy at May 08, 2013 07:09 AM (tyDFN)
Posted by: Stace at May 08, 2013 07:10 AM (YLiN/)
And then they have the balls to praise some politicians for their "public service".
Posted by: Dang at May 08, 2013 07:10 AM (R18D0)
it was Fox!
Fox!
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2013 07:11 AM (nqBYe)
I am sitting next to reporters who are talking smack about @gretawire, @JudgeJeanine & @FoxNews. Greta & the Judge are sitting chairs away
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 08, 2013 07:11 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: Waldo at May 08, 2013 07:11 AM (sXWmd)
She'll get smeared. And keep writing. Rinse. Repeat.
Sorry but I have to say this: At the end of the day, all of the media needs to stop 'being' the story; just read/write the information. I could care less about you or how hard you think your job is.
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at May 08, 2013 07:11 AM (Z5KPR)
>>> “My goal is to report on untouchable subjects in a way that is fearless.”
She is obviously biased!!!
Posted by: India Times at May 08, 2013 07:12 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Meggie Mac at May 08, 2013 07:12 AM (WCe8r)
Posted by: Zippity Doo Dah at May 08, 2013 07:12 AM (E55AK)
Posted by: mpfs at May 08, 2013 07:13 AM (iYbLN)
Posted by: Maya Angelou at May 08, 2013 07:13 AM (JQuNB)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 08, 2013 07:13 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Melodicmetal at May 08, 2013 07:13 AM (QY9FJ)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 08, 2013 07:13 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Andy at May 08, 2013 07:13 AM (0BE3B)
Posted by: Pimp at May 08, 2013 07:13 AM (da5Wo)
That is exactly how Rush got his mega-millions. He simply told the truth and when he got it wrong, he immediately apologized and corrected his mistake. Not that Rush was ever a journalist, but, he was right there commenting on the facts of every major story.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at May 08, 2013 07:13 AM (kXoT0)
She is obviously biased!!!
Posted by: India Times at May 08, 2013 11:12 AM (3ZtZW)
and i'd like to know when stories became untouchable?
and why ?
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2013 07:13 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Marcus at May 08, 2013 07:14 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 08, 2013 07:14 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Diogenes' Lamp at May 08, 2013 07:15 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Stace at May 08, 2013 07:15 AM (i5xnd)
That article is just...shocking, if it's possible to be shocked anymore. I can't even put it into words.
If the Post were a real newspaper, it would not have run an article on Atkisson, it would have offered her a job. Since its own "reporters" can't find their own asses with a flashlight.
Posted by: rockmom at May 08, 2013 07:15 AM (aBlZ1)
It followed me!
Off stupid sock!!!!
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 08, 2013 11:14 AM (da5Wo)
Didn't you off-sock in the previous thread? Hahaha!!!
Posted by: EC at May 08, 2013 07:15 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2013 07:15 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at May 08, 2013 07:16 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at May 08, 2013 11:07 AM (VtjlW)
Yup, have a co-worker who is a huge Liberal. Another co-worker who is Conservative sent him a link to something or other to prove a point. The Liberal would not click the link and he said, "It is just a lie. That is all Republicans do--they lie. They lie about everything."
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at May 08, 2013 07:16 AM (kXoT0)
Today's journalists are too concerned with performing fellatio on their god-king. Their only allegiance and discernment is to politics. Their politics. Period.
Posted by: Marcus at May 08, 2013 07:16 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: Body Builder at May 08, 2013 07:17 AM (DrC22)
Posted by: Waldo at May 08, 2013 11:11 AM (sXWmd)
Wouldn't you think the wife's wishes supersede that of the uncle? Even the parents wishes supersede that of the uncle.
Posted by: Caustic at May 08, 2013 07:17 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: Marcus at May 08, 2013 07:17 AM (GGCsk)
I mean she didn't just appear out of nowhere during F&F did she? If she's been holding someone's feet to the fire for a while it would seem to me her claim of agnosticism is accurate.
Posted by: tsrblke (work)[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 08, 2013 07:18 AM (qr78K)
Posted by: SFGoth at May 08, 2013 07:18 AM (dZ756)
Posted by: BeckoningChasm at May 08, 2013 07:18 AM (P7hip)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at May 08, 2013 07:18 AM (6zgse)
hey maybe Koch if successful would hire them?
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2013 07:19 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: mpfs at May 08, 2013 07:19 AM (iYbLN)
They are not reporters. They are propagandists for the regime.
Posted by: real joe at May 08, 2013 07:20 AM (dwQLu)
Posted by: Waldo at May 08, 2013 07:20 AM (sXWmd)
Posted by: red sweater at May 08, 2013 07:20 AM (oATMN)
Trying to find out what went wrong when 4 Americans, including an ambassador, were killed in a US Consulate in Libya, and trying to find out why the US govt is providing guns to Mexican drug cartels ==> tool of the right wing.
Ignoring stories not favorable to boyfriend Obama and/or are beneficial to the right ==> objective journalist
MFM: Because, Shut Up! I just finished reading some of the comments in the WaPo article ace linked. Jeebus, liberals are stupid and evil.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 08, 2013 07:20 AM (lVPtV)
The news channels are going to explode with these competing stories.
Posted by: Tami[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 08, 2013 07:20 AM (X6akg)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 08, 2013 07:21 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: mpfs at May 08, 2013 11:19 AM (iYbLN)<<
Dr Muad'dib at your service miss. How can I be of service?
Posted by: Muad'dib at May 08, 2013 07:21 AM (KjlbF)
Posted by: ace at May 08, 2013 07:21 AM (LCRYB)
Posted by: Reality Man at May 08, 2013 07:21 AM (obXkJ)
Did they just reprint their criticisms of Bob Woodard and just replace his name with Atkisson?
Granted Woodard has a habit of making shit up but recently he was possibly making it up about the Left which they didn't like.
Posted by: polynikes at May 08, 2013 07:21 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 08, 2013 07:21 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Caustic at May 08, 2013 07:22 AM (/b8+5)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at May 08, 2013 07:22 AM (VtjlW)
Jason Collins - Gay in the NBA, what a hero, what a guy
Christopher Stevens - Gay in the Diplomatic Corp and dead because of Hillary and Barky, no big deal.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at May 08, 2013 07:23 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: jeannebodine at May 08, 2013 07:23 AM (LBBS3)
Posted by: Waldo at May 08, 2013 07:23 AM (sXWmd)
Posted by: Muad'dib at May 08, 2013 11:21 AM (KjlbF)
Put your hand in the box.
Posted by: Bene Gesserit at May 08, 2013 07:23 AM (GQ8sn)
Trying to find out what went wrong when 4 Americans, including an ambassador, were killed in a US Consulate in Libya, and trying to find out why the US govt is providing guns to Mexican drug cartels ==> tool of the right wing.
***
That's right. She should just lie back and think of diversity.
Posted by: WalrusRex at May 08, 2013 07:23 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Sarcastic and Radicalized Redneck Queen at May 08, 2013 07:23 AM (baL2B)
There has always been a bit of the political circus in our media. Problem is that now the sideshow is constantly performing in the center ring and people like Atkisson are sitting in the curiosity booth next to the bearded lady and two-headed dog.
Posted by: Marcus at May 08, 2013 07:23 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at May 08, 2013 07:23 AM (6zgse)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 08, 2013 07:23 AM (da5Wo)
Please, please, please let it be.
And tomorrow the families of the SEAL Team 6 members who were killed in the helicopter crash in A-stan are going to speak out against the administration.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 08, 2013 07:24 AM (lVPtV)
Listen here Benny, you ain't tricking me with the box schtick again.
Posted by: Muad'dib at May 08, 2013 07:24 AM (KjlbF)
Sharyl Atkisson has bigger balls than Hairy Reed!
Verne Troyer has bigger balls than Reid.
Bigger brain, too.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 08, 2013 07:24 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Waldo at May 08, 2013 07:24 AM (sXWmd)
Today, 8 May, is the 68th anniversary of V.E. Day (for "Victory in Europe") in 1945,
which saw the German surrender and the end of World War II in the European
theater.* Lest we forget. English novelist Nicolas Monsarrat (1910-1979) was born
in Liverpool and earned a law degree at Cambridge. With the outbreak of World War
II, he joined the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve and served on the North Atlantic con-
voys for several years. This experience led to his crafting perhaps the most highly
regarded novel about modern naval warfare yet written - The Cruel Sea - which ap-
peared in 1951 while its author was serving as a British diplomat in South Africa. An
equally esteemed motion picture, starring Jack Hawkins, was made of the book two
years later, and it remains a classic today. Several other Monsarrat novels followed,
but none ever gained the stature of The Cruel Sea.)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 08, 2013 07:24 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at May 08, 2013 07:24 AM (Da/fK)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 08, 2013 07:25 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 08, 2013 07:25 AM (aDwsi)
"Time was that journalists followed stories no matter where they led.
Today's journalists are too concerned with performing fellatio on their god-king. Their only allegiance and discernment is to politics. Their politics. Period."
Sometimes I think focusing out ridicule on individual reporters and using words like kneepads, fellatio, gargling, etc. would potentially have a larger impact in the end than trying to Alinsky politicians.
Most of the time, however, I think about Letting it Burn.
Posted by: Jaws at May 08, 2013 07:25 AM (4I3Uo)
This is why Atkisson is being examined like an exotic strain of potentially dangerous bacteria.
---
I'm willing to test the theory that her danger is sexually transmitted. Because Science!!
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at May 08, 2013 07:25 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: SurferDoc at May 08, 2013 07:26 AM (6H6FZ)
Regarding the Brother KaraBombov's body, I believe the wife declined to claim it, and the uncle was next in line here in the country.
Put it on a garbage barge and dump it at sea.
Posted by: Boots at May 08, 2013 07:26 AM (oG66P)
Posted by: Caustic
Reading comments from liberals from this article and others prove your point.
I have however noticed more and more criticism of Choomboy and Hillarity than I have ever read before. A lot of Americans are sick and tired of being called names a long with a country in peril with nothing but excuses coming out of the WH.
Posted by: Cheri at May 08, 2013 07:26 AM (G+Wff)
Even if one is not overtly opining editorial choices introduce bias as well. To that end, the marketplace of ideas demands that we get fill positions (especially journalistic positions) with people from all sides of the aisle. Open disclosure of one's positions which may create bias would also help (because you may not see your bias, while it's openly apparent to others.)
And I think it goes beyond political bias. Attkisson may not be a "conservative" as much as she may be incredibly distrustful of people in power in general this is not necessarily mutually exclusive with "liberal" (I don't know this, I'm merely using her as an example.) Whereas I think the rest of the MSM has made it clear they're only distrustful of the "wrong" people in power. But both of these viewpoints possibly introduce bias into reporting. (Again, I'm not accusing Attkisson of anything. If she has a bias, this time it seems to have gotten things right. I'm sure it hasn't been 100% spot on in the past though, no one bats a thousand.)
Posted by: tsrblke (work)[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 08, 2013 07:26 AM (qr78K)
Posted by: SpongeBob Saget at May 08, 2013 07:26 AM (epxV4)
Posted by: jwb7605 ([i][u]Let it Burn[/u][/i])[/s][/b] at May 08, 2013 07:27 AM (Qxe/p)
I love the smell of chaos in the morning.
Posted by: Marcus at May 08, 2013 07:27 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: ace at May 08, 2013 11:04 AM (LCRYB)
That's Pacific time, right Ace?
Posted by: eastvalleyphx at May 08, 2013 07:27 AM (GRvW4)
It is simple as this when evaluating the framework of the left and right.
The left are children and the right are parents.
Posted by: polynikes at May 08, 2013 07:27 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: SurferDoc at May 08, 2013 11:26 AM (6H6FZ
Imagine how unbearably smug he'd be if his lefty sister had won.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 08, 2013 07:27 AM (lVPtV)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2013 07:27 AM (nqBYe)
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Sarcastic and Radicalized Redneck Queen at May 08, 2013 07:28 AM (baL2B)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 08, 2013 11:25 AM (da5Wo)
---
Is buying gold a bad thing?
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at May 08, 2013 07:28 AM (R8hU8)
Posted by: Beagle at May 08, 2013 07:29 AM (sOtz/)
and i'd like to know when stories became untouchable?
January 2004.
and why ?
Because shut up, racist!
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 08, 2013 07:29 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at May 08, 2013 07:29 AM (6zgse)
Posted by: Marcus at May 08, 2013 07:29 AM (GGCsk)
Unfortunately we live in some strange Orwellian/Huxley/Rand combined nightmare world where an Atkisson is either partisan or "see we are not biased, this story was covered" , although the rest of us ignored it instead of repeating the facts to make sure everyone was informed, because potential wingnuts might have voted with you clingers against our liberal heroes trying to establish utopia if they heard the facts instead of stories about how awesome Michelle's toned arms are."
Posted by: PaleRider at May 08, 2013 07:29 AM (vL0Nv)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 08, 2013 07:29 AM (lVPtV)
Oh the hard hard life of a blogger. Man I want this job. Is it like the "Dread Pirate Roberts" can I just off you and take the name
Posted by: tsrblke (work)[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 08, 2013 07:29 AM (qr78K)
Posted by: The boomers at May 08, 2013 07:30 AM (YGjUV)
Posted by: The MSM at May 08, 2013 07:30 AM (Zv1QB)
Regarding the Brother KaraBombov's body, I believe the wife declined to claim it, and the uncle was next in line here in the country.
Put it on a garbage barge and dump it at sea.
Those French vultures are pretty hungry... they don't mind eating roadkill.
Posted by: real joe at May 08, 2013 07:30 AM (dwQLu)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 08, 2013 07:30 AM (da5Wo)
Yup, have a co-worker who is a huge Liberal. Another co-worker who is Conservative sent him a link to something or other to prove a point. The Liberal would not click the link and he said, "It is just a lie. That is all Republicans do--they lie. They lie about everything."
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at May 08, 2013 11:16 AM (kXoT0)
I hate assholes like that. I'd say, "Go ahead. Call me a liar to my face, you fucking coward."
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at May 08, 2013 07:31 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at May 08, 2013 07:31 AM (6zgse)
Posted by: rickl at May 08, 2013 07:31 AM (zoehZ)
How about we go with a setup that allows posters to insert their own jokes?
Posted by: Marcus at May 08, 2013 07:31 AM (GGCsk)
I am sitting next to reporters who are talking smack about @gretawire, @JudgeJeanine @FoxNews. Greta the Judge are sitting chairs away
Posted by: Tami at May 08, 2013 11:11 AM (X6akg)
I hope they sue them and are taking notes.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Sarcastic and Radicalized Redneck Queen at May 08, 2013 11:28 AM (baL2B)
Some in the media thought "mean girls" was a template.
Posted by: Caustic at May 08, 2013 07:31 AM (/b8+5)
She should change it and make it easier.
Posted by: Andy
Especially now that everyone else is using his invention...
Two t's and two s's. It's really not that hard, people.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at May 08, 2013 07:32 AM (Yr6sH)
How do you feel about Monday morning absenteeism?
Posted by: EC at May 08, 2013 07:32 AM (GQ8sn)
the story does not matter or is untrue. The implications of that are quite frightening indeed.
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at May 08, 2013 11:07 AM (VtjlW)
The astonishing thing in this instance is that they flat out admitted this to be true.
They've been pushing the meme that they weren't following the story because Fox News covered it, thus rendering the topic unclean.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 08, 2013 07:32 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes C'est Magnifique at May 08, 2013 11:16 AM (kXoT0)
Absolutely. Years ago I recommended Journeys with George (Alexandra Pelosi's documentary of W's campaign) to a Lefty co-worker. He admitted he would never watch it because he "didn't want to humanize Bush."
We are not human to these people.
Posted by: real joe at May 08, 2013 07:33 AM (dwQLu)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at May 08, 2013 07:33 AM (6zgse)
Posted by: EC at May 08, 2013 11:32 AM (GQ8sn)
Punishable by death.
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at May 08, 2013 11:33 AM (6zgse)
Well then...
Posted by: EC at May 08, 2013 07:33 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at May 08, 2013 07:33 AM (VtjlW)
Tyranny!!! Who will make my Egg McMuffin?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 08, 2013 07:34 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: A Moron In Mind Only at May 08, 2013 07:34 AM (+I8Mq)
i dunno if you read wet cut loop's article yesterday about a colorado editor actually writing NRA members should be put in camps?
it's all become so fkn bizzare.
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2013 07:34 AM (nqBYe)
Best use of Hammer Space evah!
"Guns.........many."
Posted by: EC at May 08, 2013 07:34 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: jwb7605 ([i][u]Let it Burn[/u][/i])[/s][/b] at May 08, 2013 07:35 AM (Qxe/p)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at May 08, 2013 07:35 AM (6zgse)
This goes with Andy McCarthy's theory that they whitewashed the report because they are sucking up to the Left.
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 08, 2013 07:36 AM (GoIUi)
Not really, I suspect. If you're a hard core leftist, you're liable I think to trust other leftists. So they gave you a story and it satisfied you. Our biases take us in different directions.
Take a non-political example. My wife may tell me that the wood under the window is warped and she's not really sure why. I trust her so I take her at her word. I really have no reason to continue to investigate (but if I had, I'd probably find she'd been over-watering the plants and not cleaning up the overflow.)
(Actually real life story: Once my wife left out a piece of newspaper after cleaning off her nails. I was on my way out of town the morning I noticed it and she said "oh, I forgot I'll take care of it when I get back from taking your to the airport." I had no reason not to trust her. Until I got home and it was still there. Turns out she had spilled acetone on the table and stained it.)
Posted by: tsrblke (work)[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 08, 2013 07:36 AM (qr78K)
Posted by: Miss Marple at May 08, 2013 07:37 AM (GoIUi)
Divorce her!!!
Posted by: EC at May 08, 2013 07:37 AM (GQ8sn)
one that explains it all.
They should never be referred to as journalists. propaganda arm is too used up.
something else. they should become so marginalized and shown for the freaks they are.
unfortunately i'm not really knowledgeable or experienced in how to do this.
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2013 07:37 AM (nqBYe)
The Fifth Element.
One of the best silly, campy movies of all time.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at May 08, 2013 07:37 AM (/WLC3)
Posted by: t-bird at May 08, 2013 07:37 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at May 08, 2013 11:33 AM (VtjlW)
True and we all have a different frame of reference but reporters are supposed to be able to be aware of and recognize their own bias and be vigilant in not allowing it to come out in their work.
Posted by: Caustic at May 08, 2013 07:37 AM (/b8+5)
I guess kissing the ring and becoming just another soldier in an army of mediocre partisan armchair analysts is simply easier.
===========
1) The vast majority of "news" stories are near--if not total--wholesale C&P from press releases, not just politics.
2) If you get in the habit of NOT C&P'ing entire Dem party press release (you're allowed to insert (a) a helpful quote dressed up as "non-partisan" from any Dem source or (b) a quote from any R that makes other R's look bad), you will never get a position on the staff of a Dem. And that's the real plum--ugly, stupid people with little other real world skills looking for a sinecure via proving their loyalty to the party.
That's why they do it. One day, they all dream of being named White House Press Secretary. It's like little Chan Ho Mihn dreaming of being a three time NYC Marathon winner. But Chan, at least, has a chance of beating the Africans.
Like I said, ugly and stupid.
Reality says they'll be the first against the wall if they ever get the paradise they're agitating for.
Posted by: RoyalOil at May 08, 2013 07:37 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 08, 2013 07:37 AM (da5Wo)
something else. they should become so marginalized and shown for the freaks they are.
unfortunately i'm not really knowledgeable or experienced in how to do this.
How about "Paid Spokeshole".
Posted by: EC at May 08, 2013 07:38 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at May 08, 2013 07:38 AM (6zgse)
Posted by: Waldo at May 08, 2013 07:38 AM (sXWmd)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at May 08, 2013 07:38 AM (VtjlW)
The old reporters' rule of "Who,What, When, Where, How" makes a huge amount of sense.
It minimizes bias and maximizes information.
It's so passé.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at May 08, 2013 07:39 AM (/WLC3)
It's 8AM somewhere.
Posted by: EC at May 08, 2013 07:39 AM (GQ8sn)
The Alinsky-ites in this country have been very succesful in infiltration our education, military, religious and financial institutions.
We can turn this around but it will be a long, hard slog.
Posted by: Cheri at May 08, 2013 07:39 AM (G+Wff)
The Right has our own Inspector Generals that expose inaccurate reporting by people on the Right.
The Left has a Department of Propaganda that makes sure the inaccuracies are properly dispersed and protected from scrutiny.
Posted by: polynikes at May 08, 2013 07:39 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 08, 2013 07:40 AM (da5Wo)
Posted by: Waldo at May 08, 2013 07:40 AM (sXWmd)
Posted by: Cheri at May 08, 2013 07:40 AM (G+Wff)
See I'm not even sure you can reliably determine if your biases are affecting your work without a secondary interlocutor (whose bias make up is different than yours.)
To go back to what I know (Bioethics) I've advocated we'd be better off dropping the term "expert" or even analyst and just embracing the partisan makeup of the field. (Partisan in the non-political sense.) Advocate for your particular tradition be it virtue, principlism, collectivism, whatever.
I suppose this is a lot harder to do in journalism, but I'd imagine you'd need an intellectually diverse editorial board with people on roughly equal footing to choose and craft the stories reported on.
Which (as been pointed out) is not happening.
Posted by: tsrblke (work)[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 08, 2013 07:44 AM (qr78K)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at May 08, 2013 11:27 AM (lVPtV)
He is damn near unbearably smug as it is.
Posted by: SurferDoc at May 08, 2013 07:45 AM (6H6FZ)
Posted by: JQP at May 08, 2013 07:46 AM (GVL0g)
it's all become so fkn bizzare.
Posted by: willow
To be fair it was in some two bit, backbencher newspaper. Nothing we can say or do to the guy would compare to the shame he must feel over his failure to get a better gig.
I enjoyed the article. His flowing tears of impotent rage fueled me for hours.
My favorite part? Where he whined about politicians failing to bend to the will of various newspaper editorials. How dare they fail to obey the wishes of the Dallas Morning News?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at May 08, 2013 07:46 AM (SY2Kh)
NYT
NYT
POLITICO
HuffPo
The AP
Yep, not much echo chambering going on there.
http://www.pulitzer.org/awards/2012
Posted by: GnuBreed at May 08, 2013 07:46 AM (ccXZP)
Funny how this cocked-up wapo narrative isn't followed by UK broadsheets The Guardian, Times and Independent. The journalists and opinion writers at the big three never arrive at the same conclusions as those at the Telegraph but at least they aren't insufferably - and purposefully - incurious.
Posted by: 13times at May 08, 2013 07:47 AM (fGPLK)
Posted by: EC at May 08, 2013 11:37 AM (GQ8sn)
I personally thought it was cute that she figured that her thought process was:
1) Hide it with newspaper
2)?????
3) Profit!
Except, the newspaper had stuck to the table and she had no plan for getting it up, which is why the newspaper was still there when I got back. Lack of foresight and an inability to lie would be apt descriptions for my wife
. I assume she knew I'd figure it out eventually, she just wanted a few days I guess.
Posted by: tsrblke (work)[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 08, 2013 07:47 AM (qr78K)
Posted by: JQP at May 08, 2013 07:48 AM (GVL0g)
"We are not human to these people. "
In their defense, it *is* much harder to fantasize and even advocate herding us into cattlecars and Zyclon B showers when we're "human" to them.
Posted by: Jaws at May 08, 2013 07:49 AM (4I3Uo)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at May 08, 2013 11:37 AM (da5Wo)
They try to teach me to "engage the arguments of my opponents" and "consider them as you're writing."
But I have a really hard time doing that. I tend think my opponents are morons. And to be fair they usually are.
I actually had one paper I wrote where I said "my opponent's counter arguments are naive and moronic, showing lack of intellectual rigor."
I got an A
.
Posted by: tsrblke (work)[/i][/b][/u][/s] at May 08, 2013 07:49 AM (qr78K)
one that explains it all.
They should never be referred to as journalists. propaganda arm is too used up.
something else. they should become so marginalized and shown for the freaks they are.
unfortunately i'm not really knowledgeable or experienced in how to do this.
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2013 11:37 AM
I'm kind of partial to "slimey scumbags"
Posted by: berserker at May 08, 2013 07:51 AM (FMbng)
@gretawire, @JudgeJeanine @FoxNews. Greta the Judge are sitting chairs
away <
In the salad days, a good ass-kicking was a pretty good cure.
But I suppose today we can just ask then a math problem
Posted by: Marcus at May 08, 2013 07:53 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth at May 08, 2013 07:54 AM (Hsgnv)
Posted by: Marcus at May 08, 2013 07:55 AM (GGCsk)
Verne Troyer has bigger balls than Reid.
Bigger brain, too.
*
*
My cat has bigger balls than Harry Reid. And the cat's been spayed.
Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius at May 08, 2013 07:57 AM (BDU/a)
I'm kind of partial to "slimey scumbags"
I was thinking something like 'Journolefts'...but that's redundant.
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at May 08, 2013 07:58 AM (0IhFx)
Posted by: The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth at May 08, 2013 08:02 AM (Hsgnv)
Progressive partisans know they're being lied to by the administration and the propagna-media but it's OK. The lies serve a greater good, after all. Atkisson seeking truth, and acting like a reporter, doesn't earn her credibility or respect among those partisans. In fact, just the opposite: because she ignores the propaganda points we seek to make, she is a "tool", and a class enemy.
Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia; she should only report that fact and ignore any narrative that runs to the contrary.
Posted by: President For Life Obama at May 08, 2013 08:03 AM (B5y+v)
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 08, 2013 08:06 AM (IDSI7)
Posted by: tsrblke (work) at May 08, 2013 11:47 AM (qr78K)
Well I hope you made her work it off in sexual favours.
Posted by: EC at May 08, 2013 08:06 AM (GQ8sn)
To go back to what I know (Bioethics) I've advocated we'd be better off dropping the term "expert" or even analyst and just embracing the partisan makeup of the field. (Partisan in the non-political sense.) Advocate for your particular tradition be it virtue, principlism, collectivism, whatever.
I suppose this is a lot harder to do in journalism, but I'd imagine you'd need an intellectually diverse editorial board with people on roughly equal footing to choose and craft the stories reported on.
Which (as been pointed out) is not happening.
Pretty tough to achieve even-handedness within one organization. Better to achieve it on the ensemble average, viz., some of the media being liberal, and some pro-American, and neither making any bones about it. That's the way newspapers used to be a long time ago.
Posted by: Jay Guevara at May 08, 2013 08:13 AM (IDSI7)
Posted by: panzernashorn at May 08, 2013 11:22 AM (MhA4j)
Posted by: JohnW at May 08, 2013 11:35 AM (FpUC1)
Posted by: An Observation at May 08, 2013 11:49 AM (ylhEn)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2534 seconds, 324 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Who's on first?
Posted by: Doctor Fish at May 08, 2013 07:02 AM (1lQzY)