March 10, 2013
— Open Blogger Hi there, Morons and Moronettes. tmi3rd here, and in a break from weather, tonight's thoughts are about ObamaCare and working around the extremely onerous regulations now in place.
Much as I'd love to say we can realistically repeal ObamaCare, I'm not convinced our political leadership has the fortitude to do so. Under the circumstances, you're still going to need to be able to get hold of a doctor and get treated for what ails you in the immediate future.
The Wall Street Journal article that lays it out in its clearest form is hidden behind the paywall, so let's blockquote the key point:
"To keep costs low, the insurers are pressing for hospitals to grant discounts from the rates hospitals usually get in commercial plans. In return, participating hospitals would be part of smaller networks of providers. Hospitals will be paid less by the insurer, but will likely get more patients because those people will have fewer choices. The bet is that many consumers will be willing to accept these narrower networks because it will help keep premiums down."
Soooo... a pretty close approximation of HMOs and PPOs that went over so poorly in the 80s and 90s, and a very close approximation of how things work if you're insured by certain groups already in existence. You're covered if you see a doctor or receive a service within the network, but you're on your own if you go see someone outside of the network. Want to see more docs? It's going to cost you a lot more.
So let's jump to the doctor side of things. Most of the folks in the primary care fields- family medicine, pediatrics, internal medicine- are in situations where they have to see a certain number of patients in a day in order to make ends meet for that particular day. These fields don't pay terribly well for medicine (remember that we get out of school typically about $250K in debt), and the notion of doing assembly-line medicine for comparatively low pay is unattractive for a lot of new docs. We have to shuttle you in and out, meaning that you sit in the waiting room for an extra thirty minutes for thirty seconds of the MD/DO's time. Lose-lose for both sides- we don't get to know you, and you think we're a bunch of disinterested amateur golfers.
As a sidebar- some consider OB/GYN and emergency medicine (ER docs) to be primary care as well. For the moment, let's put that aside and return to the issue at hand.
The end result is that the shortage of primary care docs is going to be exacerbated by ObamaCare, and you're still going to need to be able to see a primary care physician somewhere down the road.
All is not lost, however, and here's where a silver lining exists: a significant number of docs in the primary care fields are jumping out of the traditional insurance-based model of delivering care and entering what many call concierge medicine- you pay a monthly or yearly fee to a physician, in return for having (in many cases) 24-hour-a-day access to your doc and a certain number of services and procedures that are part of that fee.
The cool parts about this for the doctors and patients are that it allows the docs to control how many patients they see in a day, which means they can spend more time actually treating the patient and spending time with the patient. Also, it allows the doc and patient to get to know each other well enough to actually establish some trust and a real relationship. Finally, a concierge doctor becomes your advocate with hospitals, should you need to be hospitalized.
Check this BusinessWeek article out for some examples, by the way.
Now here's the fine print: you still need health insurance for if you need to be hospitalized. Also, even though surgery is a lot cheaper if it's done with cash, you're still often talking about several thousand dollars (a lot of comparatively minor surgeries, for example), which most people don't have lying around.
We'll go into pricing and what not in a future post, but let's get to the bottom of this one: particularly for Morons and Moronettes approaching or at retirement age, concierge care is a really good idea. We're already in a position where we don't have enough doctors in geriatrics to begin with, and a good, long relationship with a primary care doctor can only benefit you if you get into trouble. Conversely, if you're younger or if you've got a young family, this can save you from a whole lot of inconvenience, especially if time becomes critical.It does mean that you pay out some more money for your care, but it beats the hell out of hoping that someone can make time to see you.
The somewhat ironic thing about this is that a very viable counter to ObamaCare would have been to have people pay cash for their primary care services, and leave insurance solely for things like surgery, emergency hospitalization, and so forth. That would likely have punched a big hole in what we pay out for insurance, but it's too late to cry over spilled milk.
The feds can certainly find ways to screw this up, of course. For example, licensure to practice in Massachusetts requires that you enroll in MassCare. If you want to do something to make sure there's still a private market carved out, petition your state legislature to pass laws decoupling state licensure from enrollment in ObamaCare programs. It won't stop the feds from being heavy-handed, but it will mean they likely have to go to court over it.
If we look at the other national healthcare systems out there (a phrase I detest, but it distinguishes their systems from our industry), what we may see is a situation where docs have to work a certain number of hours in public hospitals per week, and they can do private work the rest of the time. Conversely, an opthalmologist from Quebec I used to play hockey with would shut his practice down in the last couple of months of the year because the government refused to pay him for any more work. He moved down to Louisiana.
Anyway, finally, there are some groups that are worth monitoring in the interest of keeping that private side of medicine carved out... the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons are good people, as are Independent Physicians for Patient Independence. Check 'em out... in the meantime, I'll keep you posted as I get through medical school. I'm hoping to go into ear, nose, and throat surgery, but we'll see what shakes out.
I'm probably studying for my physiology test and the MCAT as you're reading this, so if you've got questions that I can answer, please come find me on Twitter.
Thanks, as ever, for reading!
-tmi3rd
Posted by: Open Blogger at
01:24 PM
| Comments (245)
Post contains 1161 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: Vic at March 10, 2013 01:28 PM (53z96)
Posted by: Raul Johnson at March 10, 2013 01:34 PM (xnRll)
Posted by: Pope Cavil I, Cylon Catholic Church at March 10, 2013 01:38 PM (mbxHg)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 10, 2013 01:39 PM (piMMO)
Uhh,
No offence tmi3rd, but you're lacking some key components to the concierge medicine phenomena. Good luck on your MCAT though. Trust me, however, I know from experience, as long as you can score "Average" and either have a solid GPA to back it up (or are a non-traditional student.) MCAT scores are pretty meaningless otherwise.
(How do I know? Because I was a top 99.5% MCAT scorer, which puts me in the top 50-100, in 2007, yet my GPA was "meh" from my choice to go really really obscure science heavy, so it came back repeatedly to bite me in the ass.)
So if your GPA is "meh" you may want to tank the MCAT (shoot for average!) Seriously, I'm not joking. One VP of admissions told me my MCAT didn't match my GPA (whatever the fuck that means) and that's why I didn't get in.
Anyway, back to Concierge medicine.
A few notes on it. Firstly, it's settings itself up for an arms race. Let's not look at the ultra rich Concierge medicine (like Bill gates has) that basically bypasses insurance. Let's look at what the average 'ron or 'ronette is going to afford.
Generally speaking concierge docs limit the number of patients they take BUT they'll also limit the number of visits you get under the plan as well. The last time the department of bioethics had a Concierge doc visit to discuss his plan he allowed 1 well visit every year (every other year for the under 30 crowd) and I think 2-3 sick visits.)
On the surface that's not that bad I suppose. Especially since he was only charging about $1500-3k I think (per year). And you're well visit included some basic labs (cholesterol, liver function etc.)
But for run-of-the-mill things like those sick visits (and things like casting a broken arm) Concierge doc still billed your insurance. I'm told this is fairly standard practice in that industry, it's how they keep costs down. However this still makes them beholden to the same insurance problems that other docs have. So you're premium is more or less for the doc's time (as a replacement for insurance, it may or may not do.)
But there's also an arms race happening amongst concierge medicine. It's race to extremes. Concierge medicine in some places (there's a practice in SC which follows this) charges less, but you get less to (more Physician Assistants, less doc time.) Or it's a race to include more (some concierge docs are trying to group with things like OB/Gyn practices so they can raise their base price.)
And this doesn't even touch upon questions of what happens when a doc goes from "standard" practice to "concierge" (hint: a lot of pissed off patients!)
The problem of course is that under our current societal system, medicine will absorb whatever resources are thrown at it. Creating new ways to throw resources at the problem (e.g. concierge medicine) won't solve jack shit.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 01:40 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 01:40 PM (AJM+z)
Posted by: Mark E. Kelly at March 10, 2013 01:41 PM (wIgpo)
Posted by: Professor Marius von Totenkopf (formerly Hoss Fuentes) at March 10, 2013 01:43 PM (aozUR)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 10, 2013 01:43 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: Huggy at March 10, 2013 01:44 PM (KpVzB)
If you are relatively healthy, you should be able to find a better rate.... or so I would hope.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 10, 2013 05:43 PM (piMMO)
Esurance actually has a health insurance portal now. (See who needs exchanges!)
You can actually find reasonable plans for decent prices through there. But as a matter of warning, some jobs require you to take employer insurance or show that you're on someone else's employer based insurance (seriously, I'm not joking.)
So pay attention to that.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 01:45 PM (GaqMa)
but it's ObamaCare that is making it impossible for me to do anything but die if I get sick, I can't afford to get sick, i'm not even sure i can afford to die.
all I can do is keep dragging myself up out of bed everyday and go to work.
Posted by: Shoey at March 10, 2013 01:47 PM (m6OUa)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 10, 2013 05:43 PM (piMMO)
Can't, Niedermeyer, for several reasons. The main one is that many of the big insurance carriers won't even quote you if you have had any kind of surgery in the last (spitballing here) 3 years or so. I had minor tongue and butt surgery (totally unrelated) about a year ago. My only option would be to up my deductible, which does not appeal to me at all, as useless as the current one is.
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 01:47 PM (AJM+z)
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 01:50 PM (AJM+z)
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 10, 2013 01:50 PM (vHU8p)
Whats going on here he roared
Well, the chief nurse responded, this guy has private insurance and those others are HMO
Posted by: Dept. Of Accuracy Dept. at March 10, 2013 01:50 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 10, 2013 01:52 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 10, 2013 01:53 PM (Sptt8)
Despite what the guy who wrote the (otherwise fairly good) Time Magazine article would have you believe, at least some of the massive increases in premiums are a result of Medicare cost shifting.
The government can legislate prices, and then force providers to take them. (The margins for Medicare services aren't great, but they're enough that docs and hospitals can't afford to pass on them.)
So cut 700 million for that program and watch the insurers panic (because they know that $700 million is coming out of their pockets.)
Medicare is not nearly as efficient as people want to believe it just has the power to make itself seem so.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 01:54 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 10, 2013 01:55 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 10, 2013 01:55 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 10, 2013 01:58 PM (Sptt8)
Yeah, there's something about "grandfathered" plans. That is another reason I just suck it up with the one I have. The whole thing is dirty, though.
I am in the midst of a project for work, which led me to a HHS database of "community health centers," for the disadvantaged, illegal, whatever. In California alone there are 1000 federally funded resources for these folks. Tell me again why that asshole in DC had to stick his fucking face into this situation and cost me bank for shitty coverage?
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 02:00 PM (AJM+z)
We're so boned.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at March 10, 2013 05:55 PM (bxiXv)
I suspect this is why they're pushing so heavily for Physician assisted suicide, it's a "camel's nose" type thing.
Strange though, because IIRC (and this is straight from memory and thus not to be trusted without verification.) anyway, memory serves that a really high percentage of patients in Oregon end up never using the kill pills. All they really wanted was to have the power to do so.
Says a lot about the current state of medicine I think.
We've got a cultural problem that needs to be solved no doubt. We waste money in medicine like crazy because.."do something damnit!"
Our heart attack catch rate is only marginally better than Europe's but we spend some insane multiplier more (5X? I think, I forgot.)
Mostly because in Europe they run some tests which are highly indicative of a heart attack, if they find nothing they send you home, in the US we say "well, 95% chance it's nothing, but let's spend $10k more to keep you here overnight running a bunch of tests just in case we're wrong."
No one cares because they're not going to pay for it (directly at least.)
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 02:01 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 10, 2013 02:02 PM (Sptt8)
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 06:00 PM (AJM+z)
Those CHC's are often mandated to get the so called "CTSA" grants that fund post graduation fellowships for doctors. That doesn't make them good, necessary or otherwise.
What it does mean in more than a few schools/hospitals use them as recruiting centers for clinical trials.
But there's totally nothing wrong with that, nah, we're not taking advantage of anyone.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 02:03 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 10, 2013 02:04 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Hank at March 10, 2013 02:04 PM (adMMf)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 10, 2013 02:06 PM (bxiXv)
Under socialism, the rich survive, everyone else, especially the politically inept suffer.
Posted by: Skandia Recluse at March 10, 2013 02:07 PM (iyzAk)
I don't give a shit if they're good. You want good medical care? Do like I do and pay for it. Oh, and stop having babies you can't afford. I should learn how to say that in spanish.
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 02:09 PM (AJM+z)
Posted by: The Hobo Wears Celebrity Skin at March 10, 2013 02:10 PM (jopHG)
Posted by: madamex at March 10, 2013 02:10 PM (+kvQd)
When I had my taxes done the preparer was offering me health insurance showing me the subsidize rates for the state run exchanges in California. The high end was about $275 month I'm paying $677 a month. I ask what do I get for $277. Couldn't answer the question.
Posted by: YIKES! at March 10, 2013 02:10 PM (mETGQ)
I've seen many instances in which someone had to have surgery with Dr. Quack, even though that doctor's reputation was mediocre, simply because their coverage would not allow them to see a superior doctor right across town.
Sometimes, incredibly, even when that different doctor would have resulted in the insuror having to write a smaller check!
I expect that this trend will continue and accelerate.
I also expect that the culminating end point of this Obamacare nonsense will be to have medical professionals essentially involuntarily conscripted into government service. Not only doctors, but nurses, med techs, physical therapists, and what have you. Their enthusiasm for this will not be marked.
Invest in your health. Drop your bad health habits. Improve your nutrition and exercise profile. Staying out of the clutches of the medical system has never been more important than it is now.
And, carefully consider medical tourism after doing your homework. I've seen people obtain top notch care abroad. The US has no monopoly on medical competence.
Posted by: torquewrench at March 10, 2013 02:10 PM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 10, 2013 02:10 PM (Sptt8)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at March 10, 2013 06:04 PM (bxiXv)
Some of that is them steering towards more profitable tests.
Take my Mom-in-law. She's disabled. Nasty falling problem. Ideally she'd use a wheelchair, but..well..stubborn, that's for a different time.
Any way, she fell once, nastly bruise and a lump on her hip.
We took her to the ER (concerned she may have broken it.
The doc insists on running a Doppler on her leg because "a clot could have weakened her leg causing her to fall."
No you dipshit, she has ataxia (per her disability) as well as severe coordination problems, that's why she fell.
Anyway, we waited 2 hours to get a damned tech in (of course it was overtime) and they billed my Father in law's insurance some crazy amount for it. Discussions with people who I know familiar with the hospital say it loves to "bill pad" to keep revenue up. The test was marginally indicated (enough that the insurance bought it) and they get their money.
Meanwhile we can't do anything to leave because taking a disabled person out of the hospital AMA is just asking for a social worker to knock on your door (even innocent, we don't need that, because it's impossible to explain to them that short of tying mother in law down, we can't prevent her from walking even when she shouldn't, trust me, we've tried.)
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 02:10 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at March 10, 2013 02:11 PM (9P+hO)
Under socialism, the rich survive, everyone else, especially the politically inept suffer.
Posted by: Skandia Recluse at March 10, 2013 06:07 PM (iyzAk)
I think this pretty much sums it up.
No offense to tmi3rd, but creating a new problem to address the old problem (that costs more money for people) really isn't the proper solution.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 02:13 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at March 10, 2013 02:13 PM (9P+hO)
Posted by: The Hobo Wears Celebrity Skin at March 10, 2013 02:13 PM (jopHG)
Please don't pat my ass after I go through the rape-i-scan just because there's stitching on my jeans.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, Crankypants Extraordinaire at March 10, 2013 02:13 PM (hO8IJ)
Docs already lose money on every Medicaid patient, but they make it up in volume?
Posted by: HeatherRadish™, Crankypants Extraordinaire at March 10, 2013 02:14 PM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: The Hobo Wears Celebrity Skin at March 10, 2013 02:16 PM (jopHG)
Posted by: Jmel at March 10, 2013 02:16 PM (wsYxg)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at March 10, 2013 02:16 PM (9P+hO)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 10, 2013 02:16 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: BHO at March 10, 2013 02:16 PM (MMC8r)
Hank, here on the relatively affluent west side of LA, a really good doctor who takes insurance is increasingly rare. I've been to one or two of the ones on my PPO plan and, whoa, they sucked. One guy was probably 100 years old. I'd do better with a low-cost major medical policy for hospitalization only (which is unlikely to happen but if it did, I'd be bankrupt in about 3 days). But I don't think you can get those anymore.
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 02:18 PM (AJM+z)
Further, she keeps insisting that she knows what that phrase means, all evidence to the contrary.
_
Posted by: BumperStickerist at March 10, 2013 06:13 PM (9P+hO)
There's no fucking economics of scale in medicine. Period bar none.
Even the oft touted "preventative medicine" by all estimations costs more than it "Saves." (whether that cost is worth it because of higher quality of life is a different question all together.)
Also, I'm fairly certain (but still a little unsure) I've read studies that show that the magic birth control doesn't really save all that much either. (turns out anyone who cares is perfectly capable of determine how many kids they want and having that many, it's the "caring" part you have to have first, not the "free birth control.")
Also the CDC conflates "unplanned" pregnancy with "unwanted." which are two entirely different beasts.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 02:18 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at March 10, 2013 02:19 PM (9P+hO)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 10, 2013 02:20 PM (Sptt8)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at March 10, 2013 06:16 PM (bxiXv)
Actually it's pretty fucking obvious the plan is to utilize modern eugenics to get rid of the "poor."
I've searched high and low for a reason for ObamaCare to mandate every from of female birth control known to man (including surgical forms) rather than generic pills (or heck even condoms.)
The only rationale I can come up with is that you're ability to properly take the pill (cheap) is inversely correlated with economic status. So you give away free methods that are more or less fool proof and "encourage" people to get them (remember this is the FSA we're talking about.) and "bammo!" instant eugenics. (Tell me I'm wrong.)
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 02:22 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at March 10, 2013 06:16 PM (9P+hO)
Cool, maybe I'll see if I can convince them that a "bioethics" degree qualifies me to advise on insurance.
(sarcasm!)
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 02:22 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: The Hobo Wears Celebrity Skin at March 10, 2013 02:22 PM (jopHG)
Posted by: Conservative Crank's iPhone at March 10, 2013 02:25 PM (RFnrQ)
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 02:26 PM (AJM+z)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at March 10, 2013 02:27 PM (9P+hO)
Posted by: zsasz at March 10, 2013 02:28 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: BumperStickerist at March 10, 2013 06:27 PM (9P+hO)
Did you see my first post above.
Trust me, I test very well
.
(I'm guessing there's some significant overlaps between the terms in what I do now and that test.)
But no, I don't want to hock ObamaCare to people.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 02:28 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Conservative Crank's iPhone at March 10, 2013 02:28 PM (RFnrQ)
Posted by: Infidel at March 10, 2013 02:29 PM (gqEUi)
Join the Amish.
I prefer:
Do nothing taxable.
Watch it all burn.
When possible rub liberal and moderate noses in their mess.
The medical system isn't going to survive obamacare. There is no reason to pay for insurance if you don't have reason to believe you can use it in the next year or so.
Posted by: Methos at March 10, 2013 02:30 PM (hO9ad)
Posted by: Conservative Crank's iPhone at March 10, 2013 06:28 PM (RFnrQ)
Holy Fuck?!
I've got friends with new kids paying less than that.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 02:30 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: clemenza at March 10, 2013 02:31 PM (KmEEq)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 10, 2013 02:31 PM (Sptt8)
Everyone pays a percentage of their income, just as we do with Medicare, but you can 'opt out'. The system in Germany is similar, but more complicated due to varying policies by the Lander ( states )
Posted by: Wally in Walla Walla at March 10, 2013 02:31 PM (Dll6b)
Posted by: Doc Muldoon at March 10, 2013 02:31 PM (YfVqC)
Posted by: Jean at March 10, 2013 02:32 PM (sTfkB)
Posted by: ddiddly at March 10, 2013 02:32 PM (M9ZP4)
Posted by: I lurk, therefore I am at March 10, 2013 02:32 PM (usDF9)
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at March 10, 2013 02:32 PM (eyJh9)
Posted by: Truman North, last of the famous international playboys at March 10, 2013 02:32 PM (I2LwF)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 10, 2013 02:33 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: The Hobo Wears Celebrity Skin at March 10, 2013 02:33 PM (jopHG)
Posted by: clemenza at March 10, 2013 02:34 PM (KmEEq)
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 02:34 PM (AJM+z)
Posted by: Truman North, last of the famous international playboys at March 10, 2013 02:34 PM (I2LwF)
Posted by: nerdygirl at March 10, 2013 02:34 PM (vHU8p)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at March 10, 2013 02:35 PM (IsF93)
Posted by: Wally in Walla Walla at March 10, 2013 02:36 PM (Dll6b)
Ohbytheway, on the topic of premiums--the Mrs. And I currently pay $1600 a month for the two of us for insurance--a good plan, no doubt, but still WTF?!?
Posted by: Conservative Crank's iPhone at March 10, 2013 06:28 PM (RFnrQ)
When I got my notice my premiums was going up almost 25 percent with the usual explanations their was one little line that kinda raise an eyebrow. It stated if I shop around and find something cheaper but didn't like and want to come back. They made it clear they are not obligated take me back as a customer.
Posted by: YIKES! at March 10, 2013 02:36 PM (mETGQ)
Posted by: steevy at March 10, 2013 02:37 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Ashley J and her Puffies at March 10, 2013 02:37 PM (3VhRQ)
Posted by: steevy at March 10, 2013 02:38 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 02:38 PM (AJM+z)
Posted by: steevy at March 10, 2013 02:39 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: steevy at March 10, 2013 02:40 PM (9XBK2)
I'm willing to cede that obamacare is as viable as the federal government.
Posted by: Mathematics, you guys at March 10, 2013 02:41 PM (hO9ad)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 10, 2013 02:41 PM (Sptt8)
And there are still fools that will tell you that gutless hack was playing 13 dimensional chess.
Posted by: Methos at March 10, 2013 02:44 PM (hO9ad)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 10, 2013 02:44 PM (bxiXv)
Come open season, which is in the late fall, Congresscritters and their employees may be a very unhappy bunch. It'll be interesting to see if there are efforts to put them back into FEHB, particularly from Democrats.
Posted by: I lurk, therefore I am at March 10, 2013 02:44 PM (usDF9)
OMG, Justamom, that is heartbreaking. I'm so sorry. And you are absolutely correct about why we will never, ever be free of this craptastic Obamacare.
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 02:45 PM (AJM+z)
We had one shot at it, and that was to get republicans into the senate and White House. It's over.
The Supreme Court wasn't much help either.
Posted by: Infidel at March 10, 2013 02:45 PM (gqEUi)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 10, 2013 02:45 PM (Sptt8)
Posted by: Conservative Crank's iPhone at March 10, 2013 02:46 PM (RFnrQ)
We had a presentation this week from the president-elect of ACOFP (American College of Osteopathic Family Practice) at our school and the gist was that Obamacare will concentrate the $$ in Family Practice, and not so much in specialties now--at least not to the degree it has been ("The pendulum is swinging back to Family Practice and will stick there for a while." was his quote).
HAHAHAHAHAH.
Oh, I laughed so hard. ACOFP is going to say that even if Family practice implodes. Just like ACOG (the American College of Gynos) will say that you shouldn't be an Ob/Gyn if you're unwilling to perform an abortion even (and advocate for "choice") as the country remains split on that.
Fact of the matter is, Obama care makes is going to insure more people, and studies repeatedly show that you're average insured person is about as far from a "rational actor" (economically) as you can get.
I expect to see more payments to ERs (because insured people are remarkably likely to skip the primary care doc and go to the ER for some sniffles) and completely unneeded specialists as a result of this.
Doing well in family practice is totally possible, you just have to work your ass off. (not that that's a bad thing, except in that it doesn't bode well for medicine in general)
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 02:46 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Herbert Hymenhopper at March 10, 2013 02:47 PM (0CTxy)
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at March 10, 2013 02:47 PM (eyJh9)
Posted by: zsasz at March 10, 2013 02:48 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: I lurk, therefore I am at March 10, 2013 06:44 PM (usDF9)
The FEHB isn't as good as everyone makes it out to be honestly.
My wife's in it.
Her insurance premium was (I shit thee not) 8X more expensive than mine and about 80% as useful.
FEHB only looks good because each various agency has negotiated a percentage of the premium they pay for their employees (and some like the Post office has stupid high numbers).
Plus there are too many choices for the actual economics of scale to set in. The people with the worst health cluster on the best plans until they implode then move on to the next plan that's cheap (seriously, my wife watched this happen to 2 plans she was on at various times.)
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 02:49 PM (GaqMa)
That was the case long before Reagan. I know this because my dad was a hospital administrator in the late 60s/early 70s and it was the case then.
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 02:52 PM (AJM+z)
It takes the artifice of government interference to achieve that.
Posted by: zsasz at March 10, 2013 06:28 PM (MMC8r)
that's just crazy enough to be true!
Posted by: Shoey at March 10, 2013 02:55 PM (m6OUa)
A good start for the background on this might be http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=218233 -- and a gem from his archives http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?singlepost=3012292 .
The latter notes that the inflation-adjusted cost for a normal delivery in 1963, including 3 days in the hospital, would be under a grand today.
Posted by: cthulhu at March 10, 2013 02:55 PM (kaalw)
I hate to agree with the troll, but the bottom line is true. You cannot have a functioning market without the ability to refuse service to those who can't or won't pay.
FDR tied us into an insurance-based system, douche. It was doomed from that point on.
Okay, I stand corrected. Doesn't change the fact that EMTALA needs to be abolished.
Posted by: Methos at March 10, 2013 02:55 PM (hO9ad)
Posted by: President Barack Obama & Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid at March 10, 2013 02:56 PM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 10, 2013 02:56 PM (Sptt8)
I dumbocrats who wanted this, DON"T HAVE TO USE IT!
Posted by: HAPPY at March 10, 2013 02:57 PM (5X289)
Today, Dr. Ben Carson's GIFTED HANDS ebook is $1.99. Nook, Kindle and iTunes. Retweeted by Dr. Ben Carson
Here's a link to the Amazon page:
http://tinyurl.com/ayqr8dz
Posted by: Retread at March 10, 2013 02:57 PM (zxitI)
Posted by: zsasz at March 10, 2013 02:57 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: steevy at March 10, 2013 02:59 PM (9XBK2)
mostly due to malpractice insurance I think.
Which is why tort reform would have made much more sense than this fuckin' steaming pile of shit known as obamacare.
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 03:00 PM (AJM+z)
It's easy enough to see why. My sister had a son last summer. The room she stayed in afterwards was bigger than my friend's condo (which comfortably fits his wife and two daughters).
Posted by: Methos at March 10, 2013 03:01 PM (hO9ad)
Posted by: steevy at March 10, 2013 03:02 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 10, 2013 03:02 PM (g7q64)
The only thing that might work is to propose exchanges and vouchers, with a variety of private plans, and that's it, and call it Obamacare. Let the jug-eared fool take his credit.
79: I still can't believe it's going to happen.
HMO anecdote, and our future: a really good hospital used to take in heart patients from a local HMO when the folks were in distress after hours. They were all on meds when they should have had bypasses long before. Of course a lot of them died in surgery, screwing up the hospital's stats. The HMO went out of business after a few years.
Posted by: PJ at March 10, 2013 03:05 PM (ZWaLo)
It's time to tell McCain and everybody else to shut the fuck up and eat their big ass biscuit (they've been allowed to amass their personal fortune but no more should we allow anyone who starts off as a pauper and becomes a king in our political system to survivee (politically)). Their time is over. New blood and new ideas. Milton Friedman and beyond! (i know he's not new but nobody on our side seems to know anything about him namely politicians). GunzHai! 3D printing and beyond!
PS Fuck A Bitch Because I Ain't One!!!
(that doesn't mean a women it means a weak heart)
Posted by: ina_ginalship at March 10, 2013 03:05 PM (o6B4x)
Posted by: Waterhouse at March 10, 2013 03:05 PM (zetp2)
Peaches,
I noticed a comment way, way up above.....If you are paying retail for your care with your favorite MDs, then negotiate a lower cash price. Talk to them, explain the situation, and tell them that if you get a substantial discount, you'll write the check after the visit. No billing...no fuss...no muss.
You can still submit the original bill to your insurance company for whatever credit you get toward your out-of-network deductible.
Oh, and GO Yankees!
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 10, 2013 03:06 PM (3Mkrp)
Posted by: Waterhouse at March 10, 2013 07:05 PM (zetp2)
Shhhhhh....he's putting.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 10, 2013 03:06 PM (3Mkrp)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 10, 2013 03:09 PM (piMMO)
Posted by: steevy at March 10, 2013 03:09 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: steevy at March 10, 2013 03:11 PM (9XBK2)
Fuck! I'm so sorry.
A click! How could I possibly imagine a top-flight athlete could power through the sound of a camera shutter swinging through 180 degrees?
That really is worse than the Holocaust. God, mea culpa.
Posted by: Waterhouse at a golf tournament at March 10, 2013 03:17 PM (zetp2)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 10, 2013 03:19 PM (/BwGa)
Posted by: steevy at March 10, 2013 03:19 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Justamom of the LiB camp at March 10, 2013 03:21 PM (/BwGa)
Posted by: zsasz at March 10, 2013 03:23 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Ook? at March 10, 2013 03:23 PM (OQpzc)
Posted by: Herbert Hymenhopper at March 10, 2013 03:24 PM (0CTxy)
Posted by: Reggie Love at March 10, 2013 03:28 PM (wIgpo)
Posted by: RWC at March 10, 2013 03:28 PM (sqp6o)
Posted by: I lurk, therefore I am at March 10, 2013 03:32 PM (usDF9)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Totes waiting until after March Madness. at March 10, 2013 03:34 PM (Gk3SS)
Perry Picklelicker, in case anyone hasn't informed you, humor is not your strong suit.
Stick to regurgitating the Panglossian talking points your man Barry sprays into your mouth. That's much more authentic.
Posted by: Waterhouse at March 10, 2013 03:37 PM (zetp2)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 10, 2013 03:37 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 10, 2013 03:42 PM (g7q64)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 10, 2013 03:43 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Totes waiting until after March Madness. at March 10, 2013 03:47 PM (Gk3SS)
Yeehaw
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 10, 2013 03:47 PM (LRFds)
There was never any attempt to actually understand the problem before jumping to the solution. It is just a wild-assed guess and a terribly ignorant one at that.
We should know better. We are ruled by worst form of arrogant amateurs imaginable.
Posted by: jc at March 10, 2013 03:49 PM (PlzOe)
Posted by: Hey-Zeus at March 10, 2013 03:51 PM (rQs7E)
Posted by: Cunegonde at March 10, 2013 03:52 PM (g7q64)
There was never any attempt to actually understand the problem before jumping to the solution. It is just a wild-assed guess and a terribly ignorant one at that.
We should know better. We are ruled by worst form of arrogant amateurs imaginable.
Posted by: jc at March 10, 2013 07:49 PM (PlzOe)
One big issue is tort reform. Alas, there won't be any because of trial lawyers' influence over the Democrats.
Posted by: I lurk, therefore I am at March 10, 2013 03:52 PM (usDF9)
Posted by: jc at March 10, 2013 07:49 PM (PlzOe)
Sadly the idea that we can legislate problems exists at the highest levels of government and academia (which feeds this administration particularly).
They need to read some fucking Locke.
Or some Aquinas.
Hell, I'm fairly certain you could even read Hobbes and figure out it's wrong.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 03:53 PM (GaqMa)
Well take heart we've taken the HMOs everyone loved to hate and made it a mandatory club....
"go us"
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 10, 2013 03:54 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 10, 2013 03:55 PM (bxiXv)
You can read Calvin and Hobbes and figure that out.
Yes, I mean that in both senses.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Totes waiting until after March Madness. at March 10, 2013 03:55 PM (Gk3SS)
Well take heart we've taken the HMOs everyone loved to hate and made it a mandatory club....
Say what you want about HMOs, but they did keep costs down while services remained somewhat high.
(Although I suppose if you lived somewhere where the good doctors could stay out of the HMO you were screwed, that never seemed to happen here, so maybe I'm biased.)
I only point this out because services are dropping while costs are increasing (so we've got mirror image HMOs I guess.)
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 03:57 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: steevy at March 10, 2013 03:58 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: jc at March 10, 2013 07:49 PM (PlzOe)Sadly the idea that we can legislate problems exists at the highest levels of government and academia (which feeds this administration particularly).They need to read some fucking Locke.Or some Aquinas.Hell, I'm fairly certain you could even read Hobbes and figure out it's wrong.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 07:53 PM (GaqMa)
===
all they had to do was talk to a mechanic. Any mechanic. You can't fix problems you don't understand, except by wild luck. Wild luck is a scarce commodity and we are probably all out.
Posted by: jc at March 10, 2013 03:58 PM (PlzOe)
Yes, I mean that in both senses.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Totes waiting until after March Madness. at March 10, 2013 07:55 PM (Gk3SS)
Well played, well played.
I like to say "I was a big government SoCon, until I read Aristotle."
A good reading of Aristotle is really quite destructive of the "there oughtta be a law!" mentality. (seeing as virtue has to be practice for virtues own sake.)
Aristotle should be mandatory reading for all legislators.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 03:59 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Mindy the wacko-bird at March 10, 2013 03:59 PM (wk9P4)
Posted by: RWC at March 10, 2013 07:28 PM (sqp6o)
That might not work out too well for them.
He is armed with a Glock 17, and seems to understand its use.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 10, 2013 03:59 PM (3Mkrp)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 10, 2013 07:59 PM (3Mkrp)
Yeah but he's black and going against "the narrative."
They'll find some way to shut him up. (probably an IRS audit.)
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 04:00 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 10, 2013 04:01 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: jc at March 10, 2013 07:49 PM (PlzOe)
The problem wasn't the problem they told you it was.
They didn't care about "improving insurance and healthcare," that was the excuse. They cared about nationalizing healthcare.
Now, people don't want that. So you ass-fuck the healthcare system bureaucratically so that when everything goes to shit they can ride in with a "solution" that gives them even more power.
You don't think they pushed the CRA because it would help people become stable homeowners, or tripled the money supply because it would help the economy, do you?
It's sabotage, because they think in the end they will get MOAR POWER out of collapse than out of actually letting people make their lives better.
They've been telling us this since the 60's *openly* and still, nobody believes it.
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at March 10, 2013 07:55 PM (bxiXv)
===
Take two big steps back and look again --- Voters are voting for people with absolutely no demonstrated ability to understand -- much less solve -- any problem, of any kind --- and then capitulating when those assholes say they are solving a problem.
The folks in power may be exactly what you say they are. WTF is wrong with the rest of us? We should know you can't solve problems you don't understand. We should know not to vote for assholes that can't (or won't) get a concept as simple as that.
Posted by: jc at March 10, 2013 04:01 PM (PlzOe)
Posted by: Mindy the wacko-bird at March 10, 2013 04:01 PM (wk9P4)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at March 10, 2013 08:01 PM (bxiXv)
Meh fair enough.
But given what we know about the negotiating tactics of hosptials (even so called "non-profits") we do need some way to remove their power of holding payers (whoever it is) effectively hostage.
The ability to set up "networks" and threaten loss of business provided said power.
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 04:03 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: steevy at March 10, 2013 04:03 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: steevy at March 10, 2013 04:04 PM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Blacksheep at March 10, 2013 04:05 PM (bS6uW)
Posted by: notsothoreau at March 10, 2013 04:07 PM (Lqy/e)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at March 10, 2013 04:08 PM (jucos)
Posted by: steevy at March 10, 2013 08:03 PM (9XBK2)
====
Agreed. And this is the location where my war against the machine begins.
I am resolved that everything must be explained. I am resolved that every explanation must be suitable for a 6 year old. I am resolved that I will be constantly shouted down.
I am still resolved all the same.
Posted by: jc at March 10, 2013 04:08 PM (PlzOe)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 10, 2013 04:10 PM (bxiXv)
And disgusting! IÂ’ve been saying this since Barack Obama became President! Anyone who hates Barack Obama are racist. They hate him because heÂ’s black!
Your friends call the President a fraud, a traitor, a dictator, Perhaps you donÂ’t know what the term dictator means.
The President was born in Hawaii so he is not illegal!
The President loves America. Where else could someone with his background can become President
There is no evidence of voter fraud, as you sore loses are now claiming. Obama won FAIR AND SQUARE!
Narcissism is not an impeachable offense so even if the President is a narcissist that isnÂ’t impeachable.
You mean the President released the name of a CIA Agent endangering the lives of many US contacts around the world? Oh, excuse me, that was the Bush administration
The President was born in Hawaii which makes him an American
The Presidents Cabinet is full of white men. So I guess that he doesnÂ’t hate White people
You have no idea what the word usurper means do you? He won two elections for President
The President is rebuilding America and the economy following the neglect and incompetence of President Bush, Not destroying it!
You obviously have no idea what Marxism and Communism means since the President isnÂ’t even close to either of those.
The President isnÂ’t a liar. But even if he was that is not a high crime or misdemeanor required to rise to an impeachable offense.
The President is coming after the assault weapons and high capacity magazines. State laws canÂ’t work when all the criminal has to do is going to a neighboring state with weaker laws and pick up one at a gun show without any background check.
Federal laws are needed. And no one is going to take your hand gun.
He is a Christian, NOT a Muslim!
The GOP, known by almost all Americans as either the “Party of NO” or alternatively, as the “Party of Stupid” gets a pass for the divisiveness that they’ve poisoned the process, is that right???
You guys are almost as bad as fox “news”
This is another case of blaming Obama for the damages YOU racist righties caused! youÂ’re partially correct; he is the most hated man everÂ….by racists, bigots, most southerners, the KKK, and all the right-wing nuts out there, including you. But he is liked and respected by a whole lot more people. In fact, although he won 53% of the popular vote, the latest Gallup poll shows that his approval is at 58%! He is hated because he is black!
The continuous attempt by the White far-right in Congress to shut down the government rather than work with our black president has a lot to do with racism.
The election of a black President not just once but twice and resoundingly the second time has unhinged many on the far right.
Yes, This President has WON a second term, America has rejected the right-wing fear-mongering! America HAS rejected right-wing hate-mongering! America HAS rejected the far-right brain-dead belief of Americans can ONLY be White and Christian!
We rejected that when we Americans RE-ELECTED Barack Obama as President, and the racist right can’t expect the fact that a majority of Americans DON’T hate having a Black Man, or as they would call it, “Minority”, leading the country!
Republicans: We screwed you all, blaming all our problems on the black guy just didnÂ’t work!
Posted by: The Question Man at March 10, 2013 04:10 PM (3w4WK)
Posted by: Herbert Hymenhopper at March 10, 2013 04:13 PM (0CTxy)
Unfortunately, you can't stop people from being lazy, you need a solution that takes that into account, and we thought we had one but it didn't work out. Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at March 10, 2013 08:10 PM (bxiXv)
100 years ago the consequences of laziness and stupidity tended to be a bit more final.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Totes waiting until after March Madness. at March 10, 2013 04:14 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Cunegonde at March 10, 2013 04:16 PM (g7q64)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 10, 2013 04:16 PM (bxiXv)
But there is a sort of "Laffer Curve" there that we appear to be headed for the wrong end of. Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at March 10, 2013 08:16 PM (bxiXv)
I still think it's mean that Mike Judge got to use the time machine.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Totes waiting until after March Madness. at March 10, 2013 04:17 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 10, 2013 04:18 PM (g7q64)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 10, 2013 04:19 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 10, 2013 04:19 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i][/b][/s] at March 10, 2013 04:20 PM (bxiXv)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Totes waiting until after March Madness. at March 10, 2013 08:14 PM (Gk3SS)
Hell, you don't even have to go back that far, atc. 65-70, tops.
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 04:21 PM (AJM+z)
Giggles is at 48%...probably more like 40% if you get past the "don't pick on the black kid" passive aggressive brainwashed bullshit.
Go fuck yourself.
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 10, 2013 04:22 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 10, 2013 04:23 PM (g7q64)
Fenelon, I believe the question was "how bad can it get?"
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 04:24 PM (AJM+z)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 10, 2013 04:25 PM (g7q64)
Posted by: Mindy the wacko-bird at March 10, 2013 04:26 PM (wk9P4)
Is there anyone on the fuckin' planet who did not hear him say "my Muslim religion" on tee vee before he was corrected by that shitbird who was interviewing him? What part do those still questioning this STILL not understand?
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 04:29 PM (AJM+z)
the city of Chicago is an insane asylum.
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 10, 2013 04:30 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 10, 2013 04:30 PM (g7q64)
Posted by: Herbert Hymenhopper at March 10, 2013 04:33 PM (0CTxy)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 10, 2013 04:33 PM (g7q64)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 10, 2013 04:34 PM (g7q64)
It's NOT his fault! If Mooch was your first wife, how anxious would you be to have more? hmmmmm . . .
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 04:36 PM (AJM+z)
Posted by: Mindy the wacko-bird at March 10, 2013 04:37 PM (wk9P4)
I, playing the roll of Barbara Billingsley, aka Beaver's mother, call BS on the whole thing.
He will keep it up for about 2 weeks and then revert to type.
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 10, 2013 04:37 PM (GoIUi)
Posted by: Emdoc at March 10, 2013 04:38 PM (DhR/C)
The problems with health care can be understood. A good place to start (like just about every one of our problems that government gets involved with) is the first 5 assumptions of the Law of Supply and Demand -- Scarcity, Rationality, Multiple Wants, Substitutability, and Law of Diminishing Returns (or diminishing marginal valuation DMV -- your choice -- I prefer LDR)
Obamacare does not address scarcity -- in fact it will make it worse.
It sure as hell is not rational.
The interaction between Multiple Wants and Substitutability was, and is still, the major problem to be addressed. However, since there was no willingness to understand the problem before acting these two issues remain the reason why the whole approach is completely fucked up and won't solve one damned thing.
Once this abomination gets rolling we will see LDR in action is a huge way, and it won't be pretty.
It is never too much for us to ask for the theoretical basis for the great solution that any politician from any party decides to force upon us. If they can't explain it in terms of the Law of S/D they simply are not the people that should be assigned the job. (Many problems will go beyond the Law of S/D -- I am just noting that problem solving on a national scale should always include this step, and we should demand it every time. Otherwise, we have no realistic way to judge the proposal or even the basic competency of the person who claims to have some grand solution.)
If they insist on forcing the solution upon us without being able to address their theory in a realistic (as determined by the universe, not humans) way, then tar and feathers are the minimum that should occur.
Posted by: jc at March 10, 2013 04:38 PM (PlzOe)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 10, 2013 04:38 PM (g7q64)
Posted by: Mindy the wacko-bird at March 10, 2013 08:37 PM (wk9P4)
{{{{{Mindy}}}}) you rock, girl!
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 04:42 PM (AJM+z)
That is a certified AoS Classic, right there, doc!
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 04:43 PM (AJM+z)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 10, 2013 04:43 PM (g7q64)
Hey Hubert you want to go over this I'm game...do understand if you are seriously saying Choom is a Xian we need to have a long talk about Jerry Wright and Pfleger bud...
Jerry Wright would be under persecution and properly so if he were white saying the same shit in reverse...
Ogabe is such a good Xian he swears he never heard any of Jerry's racist bullshit over 20 years...
Hal E Lou Yeah baby
Posted by: sven10077-ArkLaTex travelogue and Researcher at March 10, 2013 04:44 PM (LRFds)
Posted by: steevy at March 10, 2013 08:04 PM (9XBK2)
that's a great movie... i'm there.
Posted by: Shoey at March 10, 2013 04:46 PM (m6OUa)
My husband went to work in Africa for an American mining company. We had insurance through that company, which was nice after paying Blue Cross for a high-deductible policy while he was a consultant.
After he had been over there for 6 months, he was recruited by a South African firm. I told him it was ok to switch jobs, as long as there was medical insurance. They said no problem, so he took the new job.
The insurance was through a British firm which carried ex-pat insurance. We had to send all bils to them and they would reimburse. After about 4 months, we were notified by the insurer that they would no longer carry anyone in the US. (This was right after Obamacare passed.) N problem, they said. We will insure your wife through one of our US offices.
Only I didn't live in Colorado or Massachusetts, and my husband didn't work out of their US offices. Bzzzzz! No dice, because health insurance cannot cross state lines (which would have been another reform that would have helped which did NOT get included in the bill).
So they told me to get an individual policy and they would pay for it. HA!
NO insurer would take me because I have high blood pressure (wonder why) INCLUDING Blue Cross, which I had been insured with a year earlier! Nope. I was told I could apply to the State of Indiana for their "uninsurable" people and it would cost me $800 per month.
The agent finally admitted that the insurers were not taking anyone who even had a hangnail because they knew in 2014 they would have to take everyone.
So I have had no insurance since around the time Obamacare passed. My husband is insured, but I am not. I got a discount on my BP meds because I pay cash, and I pay cash to my doctor.
I go on Medicare in September, so I have made it through this mess with no appreciable problems, except the cost of meds. No big deal, as I can afford $255/month.
I am sure there are people who got caught in this in worse shape, so I consider myself lucky.
Obamacare is a total fraud.
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 10, 2013 04:49 PM (GoIUi)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 10, 2013 04:50 PM (g7q64)
That is a certified AoS Classic, right there, doc!
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 08:43 PM (AJM+z)
seconded...
Posted by: Shoey at March 10, 2013 04:51 PM (m6OUa)
THAT!!!! A huge part of the problem. And I am very sorry for your troubles, Miss Marple.
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 04:53 PM (AJM+z)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 10, 2013 04:53 PM (g7q64)
Sven boy - Obama is the biggest Muslim killer alive. He may not be a Cristo-Freak but he is certainly no towel-head.
Posted by: Herbert Hymenhopper at March 10, 2013 04:55 PM (0CTxy)
Posted by: katya the designated driver at March 10, 2013 04:56 PM (DoZD+)
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 10, 2013 04:57 PM (GoIUi)
Posted by: katya the designated driver at March 10, 2013 08:56 PM (DoZD+)
===
What would you prefer? There is nothing to be gained by trying to reason with tired children, drunks, damned fools, or the mentally ill. A few of them appear to be in all four groups.
Posted by: jc at March 10, 2013 04:59 PM (PlzOe)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 10, 2013 05:00 PM (g7q64)
States rights!
Kaiser sells me insurance and Georgia regulates it.
Posted by: Herbert Hymenhopper at March 10, 2013 05:00 PM (0CTxy)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 10, 2013 05:02 PM (g7q64)
May your premiums go up, may you end up in the long clinic lines, and may you be told to go home and take a pill instead of getting a hip replacement.
Posted by: Miss Marple at March 10, 2013 05:02 PM (GoIUi)
Posted by: The Questioning Man at March 10, 2013 05:06 PM (eyJh9)
Most of us here don't qualify under subsection 3766Q, Coverage for the Damned, but thanks for the info. Not at all surprised that it's Kaiser.
Posted by: Peaches at March 10, 2013 05:08 PM (AJM+z)
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at March 10, 2013 05:08 PM (eyJh9)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 10, 2013 05:08 PM (g7q64)
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at March 10, 2013 05:10 PM (eyJh9)
Posted by: Herbert Hymenhopper at March 10, 2013 05:12 PM (0CTxy)
Posted by: thatcrazyjerseyguy at March 10, 2013 05:26 PM (bnM03)
New York/New Jersey Moron meetup list.
nynjmeet at optimum dot net
Send an opt-in e-mail if you are interested in joining us (and getting a ticket for the raffle for a fresh hobo pelt).
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 10, 2013 05:30 PM (3Mkrp)
Posted by: thatcrazyjerseyguy at March 10, 2013 09:26 PM (bnM03)
====
this may be the part that frustrates me the most --- we have a real problem, and I believe addressing the problem would make a lot of sense.
However, instead of learning about the problem, understanding it, modeling it and testing the model, and then acting -- we get a bullshit wild guess shoved down our throats on a permanent until it collapses basis.
Tar/feathers is too good for them.
Posted by: jc at March 10, 2013 05:33 PM (PlzOe)
Posted by: Baldy at March 10, 2013 05:49 PM (opS9C)
Posted by: Baldy at March 10, 2013 06:00 PM (opS9C)
OT, but just out of curiousity. A friend claims her husband, who is a GP, makes $750K per year. That's supposedly the W-2 income, not the office gross. 1 guy, with a busy practice. She says he sees 50 patients a day.
Anyone know anything about medical practice economics who can comment on whether that is viable or not? Seemed wildly inflated to me, just searching those sites that have average salaries for various professions.
Posted by: RM at March 10, 2013 07:54 PM (ixDYs)
Posted by: RM at March 10, 2013 11:54 PM (ixDYs)
50patients/day let's say 250 working days in a year is about 12500 patients by my math.
If you can squeeze $60/patient out of them I suppose it's feasible.
Certainly high end of the scale though.
Also consider that even in a 10 hour day, that's 5 patients every hour (12 min/patient assuming no breaks.)
Posted by: tsrblke at March 10, 2013 08:30 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Tom22ndState at March 12, 2013 05:04 PM (So/6x)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2189 seconds, 373 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Vic at March 10, 2013 01:26 PM (53z96)