October 09, 2013
— Ace Ideology and partisan leaning permit people who are ignorant of the facts and the law to have an overly-firm opinion on matters they know nothing about.
Note this doesn't mean that ideological people are ignorant of the facts, law, economics, history, or all the rest. In fact, some of the most ideological people are the most informed. Surveys consistently show that independent voters -- those without a firm ideology (or at least one they admit to having) tend to be the least informed of all the population, the so-called Low Information Voters.
(As an Independent myself, I'm not saying all Independents are ignorant, of course. But, as a group, they do have the lowest level of information about current events and politics.)
While ideology is no bar to having actual expertise, ideology does permit those without any particular expertise to have an opinion on matters they know little about. A conservative will at least have a First Approximation on a matter by trying to figure out if a policy or law reduces freedom or expands it. A leftist similarly will form a First Approximation of an opinion by deciding if a law or policy advances a group in the leftist coalition.
This is not abnormal or wrong; when people are on an unknown road, without any familiar landmarks, they resort to very general rules of road-travel. A leftist is predisposed to take the left fork, for example, and a conservative the right. (A libertarian gets out a coin and flips it.)
The problem is that the media makes these sorts of decisions out of nearly perfect ignorance, but, having a Corporate Mission of presenting itself as Expert and Informed on every issue, cannot admit that it is simply groping based upon its ideology, and dresses up its partisan/ideological guesses as "expertise."
Even when they have no expertise. Indeed, in the case of Shutdown Theater, they are missing such a basic element of property law as to be laughably, ridiculously ignorant.
The media has several reasons for not giving any play to shutdown theater. The first is obviously simple partisanship -- they know Obama is a weak president, they all support Obama, and they want him to "win" in the current fight, as the summer and fall have been dominated by nothing but high-profile failures, embarrassments, climbdowns, and reversals.
They know further that Obama's odds of "winning" the current fight depend heavily on public opinion, so they execute Obama's tactical plan of making the shutdown appear to be solely the work of Republicans. Any contrary storyline confuses the Narrative -- by the way, media, most Narratives should be somewhat confused by contrary facts and indications, don't you think?
Is the Truth ever as simple as the White Hat/Black Hat Narrative the media favors? It continues to astonish me that the media credits itself as being nuanced, enlightened thinkers comfortable with doubt and contrary factual signals and yet continues to present a Babyfood Leftist Narrative to its declining audience.
While simple partisanship explains much of media behavior, one must not discount the operation of simple, complete, out-of-their depths ignorance.
And that's what I'll be talking about for the rest of this article. They're missing something rather Huge in property law, and this ignorance permits them to continue to believe there's nothing at all wrong with the National Park Service capturing public lands for partisan political ends.
And I do mean Huge. This is first-year stuff. This is not just first-year stuff, this is first-half of the first-year stuff.
But the media doesn't know a whole lot of Huge things, but they paper over their manifold ignorances with the confident swagger of the Righteously, Ignorantly, Indignantly Partisan.
For a factual predicate, let's turn to the Park Service's behavior at Yellowstone Park, where Park Service outlaws (and they are outside the law) blocked the views of Old Faithful with SUVs, to prevent tourists (with a right to be on the property) from having the enjoyment of simply looking at Old Faithful.
Do they have the legal right to do this? No. The media doesn't understand this, however, as they're ignorant. Because they are ignorant of the law, their ignorance serves to permit their ideology and partisan rooting interest to make the call on this behavior, and deem it normal and acceptable.
I'll get to that in a bit.
Jonathan V. Last calls this possibly the worst scandal of the Obama administration, and I think he's right. And yet the media treats this all as Business as Usual; what's all the fuss?
Again, later on, I'll explain it, for the ignoramuses of the partisan reflex Bennington College Media.
The conduct of the National Park Service over the last week might be the biggest scandal of the Obama administration. This is an expansive claim, of course. Benghazi, Fast and Furious, the IRS, the NSA, the HHS mandate--this is an administration that has not lacked for appalling abuses of power. And we still have three years to go.Even so, consider the actions of the National Park Service since the government shutdown began. People first noticed what the NPS was up to when the World War II Memorial on the National Mall was “closed.” Just to be clear, the memorial is an open plaza. There is nothing to operate. Sometimes there might be a ranger standing around. But he’s not collecting tickets or opening gates. Putting up barricades and posting guards to “close” the World War II Memorial takes more resources and manpower than “keeping it open.”
The closure of the World War II Memorial was just the start of the Park ServiceÂ’s partisan assault on the citizenry. ThereÂ’s a cute little historic site just outside of the capital in McLean, Virginia, called the Claude Moore Colonial Farm. They do historical reenactments, and once upon a time the National Park Service helped run the place. But in 1980, the NPS cut the farm out of its budget. A group of private citizens set up an endowment to take care of the farmÂ’s expenses. Ever since, the site has operated independently through a combination of private donations and volunteer workers.
The farmÂ’s administrators appealed this directive--they explained that the Park Service doesnÂ’t actually do anything for the historic site. The folks at the NPS were unmoved. And so, last week, the National Park Service found the scratch to send officers to the park to forcibly remove both volunteer workers and visitors.
Think about that for a minute. The Park Service, which is supposed to serve the public by administering parks, is now in the business of forcing parks they donÂ’t administer to close.
....
But the pièce de résistance occurred in South Dakota. The Park Service wasn’t content just to close Mount Rushmore. No, they went the extra mile and put out orange cones to block the little scenic overlook areas on the roads near Mount Rushmore. You know, just to make sure no taxpayers could catch a glimpse of it.
ItÂ’s one thing for politicians to play shutdown theater. ItÂ’s another thing entirely for a civil bureaucracy entrusted with the privilege of caring for our national heritage to wage war against the citizenry on behalf of a political party.
Please read the whole thing, or at the very least click on the whole thing, as I've swiped a bit more from Jonathan Last than is really kosher.
Now, I know why the media doesn't think this is Any Big Deal. And I know this, because while the Uninformed cannot accurately guess the mind of the Informed, the Informed may in fact make very accurate guesses about the workings of the mind of the Uninformed. All one has to do is strip all knowledge from one's mind, and ponder, "What would the Ignorant Man think of all this, if he didn't know anything at all about it?"
Well, the Ignorant Man would proceed from Analogy. The Ignorant Man would think, "Well, if Starbucks wished to close its shops as a political protest against the GOP, or against citizens generally, in order to damage the GOP politically, they'd be perfectly within their rights to do so. If Starbucks had, say, a traveling collection of artworks they displayed on their walls, and wished to cover those artworks up whenever some (or all) of the public entered, that would be Starbucks' right. That might be politically unpopular, and disastrous for business, but they'd have every legal right to do that."
And the Ignorant Man would be right. And yet his analogy fails because the situations are not analogous -- and the Ignorant Man not only doesn't know that they're not analogous, but he's so ignorant he lacks the imagination to even speculate as to how they might not be analogous.
99% of all property in America is owned according to what I'll call "unified ownership interest," even though that's a term I just made up. Starbucks owns its shops (and let's put aside the fact that they lease much of their space; a lease is not a full ownership interest, but during the period of the lease, the lessee has virtually all rights associated with ownership, so long as he satisfies his obligations per the contract of lease).
This "unified ownership interest" is so common that many people think it's the only form of ownership.
But in fact 1% of property (caveat: I'm just guessing at numbers here; I doubt there's an actual study that pins this down) is not held in such a "unified ownership interest."
It's held in trust. And the owner of record is not the beneficial owner. The legal owner is not the same as the owner who is to enjoy the benefits flowing from ownership.
Starbucks is not just the owner of record of Starbucks, it's not just the nominal, on-paper owner of Starbucks. Starbucks is all that, plus it is also the beneficial owner of Starbucks.
These are two separate concepts of ownership and these terms I'm not making up. These are the real legal terms for a division of the normal parcel of rights of ownership. Google it.
The division is simple, and would occur to anyone, if they gave it a moment's thought. The simplest illustration of a split in nominal ownership and beneficial ownership is a trust fund set up for a three year old child. The child is obviously too young to make any kind of decisions about the trust; instead, a trustee is appointed to make trades, sell parts of the trust (for profit), pay taxes, and so on.
The trustee is the nominal owner of the property contained in the trust. On paper, he owns it. That's why we call him the owner-of-record. And he must have the legal ownership over the trust, because when he sells or buys for the trust, his counter-party must know that the trustee has the legal right to undertake the sales and purchases of the trust. No one would want to strike a deal for a purchase of a $350 million property if a three-year-old baby could pop up at any time and say "Goo-goo gah-gah, I don' wanna buy this lakefront property. Goo-goo gah-gah, I hereby abrogate this contract."
But while the trustee is the nominal owner of the property, he is not the beneficial owner of it. The beneficial owner -- the true owner -- is the baby. The trustee is legally permitted to make decisions affecting the property held in trust, but only for the purposes of ultimately benefiting the beneficial owner. The beneficial owner is the owner who is to accrue all benefits from the trust.
The trustee cannot, for example, agree to purchase stock at a higher-than-market price on the condition that the man he's buying for purchase his own property at a higher-than-market rate. That is, he cannot leverage trust property as a sweetener to benefit his own bank account.
If he's discovered doing that, he will be removed as trustee, probably disbarred, and possibly jailed (for embezzlement, or a similar crime).
Note that where these two interests -- owner-of-record interest, and beneficial interest -- united in the same person, there would be no problem at all with this sort of deal, where one party agrees to pay a bit too much for one thing, on the condition the counter-party pays a bit too much for something else. Such deals are so common there's not even a good word for them. They just are.
But when an owner-of-record attempts to leverage property he only "owns" as a nominal owner in order to benefit himself --and not the trust, and not the beneficiary of the trust -- using the assets of the trust, it's criminal conduct.
The media does not know this. The media is not expert in anything beyond Writing Things Down and Having a Good Phone Voice, but they present themselves as General Universal Experts Without Portfolio.
But they're not. In fact, they're not even well-informed enough to even know what the hell I'm talking about here, and then ask questions of an actual expert. They don't even know that much -- they don't know enough to know they're on unfirm ground with their Starbucks analogy, and therefore should ask an actual expert before making large conclusions based on a flawed analogy.
The Park Service -- the Interior Department -- is in fact the owner-of-record of these public spaces. They are legally entitled and obligated to manage these spaces... but as a trustee, as an owner of record, acting for the actual benefit of the true owner of the property, which is itself, of course, the American public.
If the Park Service actually was both owner-of-record and beneficial owner, they would have unified rights in this regard, and could act on whim and out of obvious self-dealing personal interest (in as much as all Government Workers would like to maximize pressure on Taxpayers to extract money from them), and that would all be legal.
Annoying and horrible, but legal.
But these ownership interests are not in fact united in the Park Service, or the Interior Department. All public lands -- and I won't even bother to look this up, but go ahead and check -- are held "for the enjoyment and benefit of the American people."
They're held in trust. And when you hold something in trust for the benefit of someone else, you are not permitted to make self-interested decisions about the the use of the property.
A "unified interest" owner could make all sorts of capricious and publicly-harming decisions about his property -- and while he might be a dick, he wouldn't be a lawbreaker.
I can be arbitrary and capricious with my banning policy. That will get me grief, but I do not hold this blog in trust for any commenter. I own it outright, and hence can act capriciously with my property.
But someone who holds property in trust for the benefit of someone else is legally required to:
1) Make all reasonable efforts to afford the beneficial owner of the enjoyment of the property of the trust, and,
2) Scrupulously avoid damaging the interests of the beneficial owner, for example, to personally benefit a third party or the trustee himself.
Here are some other things a trustee cannot do:
He cannot attempt to exert pressure on the beneficiary of the trustee by denying him the enjoyment of the property held in trust (except to the extent that is spelled out in the instrument establishing the trust).
He cannot harm the beneficiary of the trust to "Teach the beneficiary a lesson" about the Important Work the trustee does.
He cannot blockade the property of the trust to put political pressure on a political party he doesn't favor.
He cannot use the property of the trust for his own benefit and enjoyment.
He cannot capriciously decide that the beneficiary of the trust shall not have the natural rights of enjoyment of the trust, just because he's Mad at the Beneficiary.
And he definitely, definitely may not block the beneficiary from enjoying the property held in his name to coerce the beneficiary to pay him more for his services as trustee, or to give more freely to charities the trustee favors.
Obama does not own the military, the government, or the national parks, media. Obama instead is the trustee of these things -- but is required to oversee them for the benefit of their true owners, the American People.
Lands held in trust are not "owned" by the government in the same way that the Starbucks Corporation is owned by the Starbucks shareholders. Starbucks shareholders not only own a piece of the company on paper, but also own the beneficial interest of that piece of the company. Dividends accrue to their benefit, not some third-party beneficiary of the Starbucks Trust.
This why we on the right make such a big deal over whether these moves "save money" or not - if they saved money, these moves could, arguably, be credited as actually benefiting the trustees, and hence would, arguably, be legal.
But when the government is actually Spending More Money to harass and harm citizens, sorry media, there is no possible way to construe this as "acting for the benefit of the trustees."
Blockading someone's view of Mount Rushmore or Old Faithful obviously does not "preserve" the trust, as viewing does not damage the property held in trust.
So no, Media, actually it's not just like Starbucks, and it's not business as usual for a trustee to deliberately harm and harass the actual beneficial owner of the property of the trust.
In fact, it's illegal.
And if you knew a damn thing about anything, this would have occurred to you.
But you don't, so it didn't, and your nasty, ignorant obnoxiously-overconfident leftist ideology papers over all the gaps in your knowledge base.
Posted by: Ace at
10:30 AM
| Comments (513)
Post contains 2996 words, total size 18 kb.
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 09, 2013 10:36 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Havedash at October 09, 2013 10:37 AM (F0WNa)
The definition of divided property interests you describe is called the "bundle of sticks."
I shit you not. Your "unified ownership interest" does sound more scientific.
Posted by: Jollyroger at October 09, 2013 10:38 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: Voices, I hear voices at October 09, 2013 10:38 AM (iX8ml)
Posted by: eleven at October 09, 2013 10:38 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: Roy at October 09, 2013 10:39 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: |_+\ at October 09, 2013 10:39 AM (+hhsZ)
Posted by: The Obsidian Owl at October 09, 2013 02:33 PM (tWmgi)
Those aren't thumbs.
Posted by: Dean Pelton at October 09, 2013 10:39 AM (ggRof)
Posted by: RS at October 09, 2013 10:39 AM (YAGV/)
Posted by: nnptcgrad at October 09, 2013 10:39 AM (9JELU)
Posted by: Insanity at October 09, 2013 10:39 AM (QgAFR)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 09, 2013 10:40 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 10:40 AM (lVPtV)
Posted by: dananjcon at October 09, 2013 10:40 AM (wmU4G)
Posted by: Jinx the Cat at October 09, 2013 10:41 AM (l3vZN)
A Marxist takes over both parts of the road and puts barriers up.
Posted by: dfbaskwill at October 09, 2013 10:41 AM (71LDo)
Posted by: ace at October 09, 2013 10:41 AM (/IWYB)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at October 09, 2013 10:41 AM (QF8uk)
Posted by: brak at October 09, 2013 10:42 AM (NaTky)
Also the term you're looking for regarding the trustee is "breach of fiduciary duty." This means the trustee owes a fiduciary duty, the highest standard to the beneficiaries, "a punctilio of an honor, the most sensitive."
My bus law prof would be so proud.
Posted by: Jollyroger at October 09, 2013 10:43 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: joncelli at October 09, 2013 10:43 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: William at October 09, 2013 10:43 AM (w6VLB)
It gets worse: try to build on your privately owned land where the DOI decided it might be a refuge for some potential rare species.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at October 09, 2013 10:43 AM (U292F)
Posted by: Shep at October 09, 2013 10:43 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at October 09, 2013 10:43 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: RS at October 09, 2013 10:44 AM (YAGV/)
Fucking brilliant.
Right on. They are spending MORE MONEY to FUCK the American people. You know, the beneficiaries of the govt's oversight...
Posted by: prescient11 at October 09, 2013 10:44 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at October 09, 2013 10:44 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: Mr. Feverhead at October 09, 2013 10:44 AM (SzAZ7)
Posted by: ToursLepantoVienna at October 09, 2013 10:44 AM (UlI/7)
Posted by: Mr Pink at October 09, 2013 10:45 AM (EmcU0)
Posted by: Roy at October 09, 2013 10:45 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: bonhomme at October 09, 2013 10:45 AM (yETln)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at October 09, 2013 02:41 PM (QF8uk)
Spot on. They think they are experts on everything, but they really only know what their bosses let them know.
Posted by: madamex at October 09, 2013 10:45 AM (1zsKV)
Posted by: Jollyroger at October 09, 2013 10:45 AM (t06LC)
Good poat, oh Furry One.
Too bad the law doesn't seem to matter much to this clowncar of an administration. Perhaps a couple of high-profile civil rights lawsuits would help to edumacate these Bozos about their proper legal role.
Along with a bit of jail time.
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit at October 09, 2013 10:45 AM (0HooB)
Ace.... you would be correct except for one thing...
As far as the left is concerned the Government itself is an entity, with Rights unto itself.... and thus OWNS the property...
Heck.... if you pay property Taxes, you really don't even own YOUR Property... as the State can repossesses it if you don't pay your tax...
And the State CAN tell you what you may, or may not, do on your OWN Property... through zoning, and the building permit process... (not to mention that they the Feds now say they own ALL moving water within the US).
Heck... it can be argued that the only entity which now HAS true property rights... ie the ability to use land as it wishes, is the Federal Government...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 09, 2013 10:45 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Insanity at October 09, 2013 10:45 AM (QgAFR)
And if you knew a damn thing about anything, this would have occurred to you.
But you don't, so it didn't, and your nasty, ignorant obnoxiously-overconfident leftist ideology papers over all the gaps in your knowledge base.
Stop, ace, stop! You had me at hello!
*swoon*
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 10:46 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: YIKES! at October 09, 2013 10:46 AM (mETGQ)
Posted by: Not the KGB at October 09, 2013 10:46 AM (0cMkb)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 09, 2013 10:46 AM (a4Omg)
Posted by: Surellin at October 09, 2013 10:46 AM (DWuhs)
Posted by: Jinx the Cat at October 09, 2013 10:46 AM (l3vZN)
BTW,
"Goo-goo gah-gah, I don' wanna buy this lakefront property. Goo-goo gah-gah, I hereby abrogate this contract."
I can't be the only one who pictured an infant alexthechick saying this. Right?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 10:47 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: bonhomme at October 09, 2013 10:47 AM (yETln)
Posted by: Beto at October 09, 2013 10:48 AM (VWfCN)
Posted by: angler at October 09, 2013 10:48 AM (+zZOH)
Posted by: Mr Pink at October 09, 2013 10:48 AM (EmcU0)
Posted by: Mr. Feverhead at October 09, 2013 10:48 AM (SzAZ7)
Posted by: Insanity at October 09, 2013 02:39 PM (QgAFR)
Hmmm.... maybe if we all build a Wall????
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 09, 2013 10:48 AM (lZBBB)
These particular park rangers and their superiors should not be accorded immunity from prosecution for unlawful imprisonment, unlawful arrest, harassment, threatening with a deadly weapon, and whatever else.
They should be prosecuted, fined, and jailed.
Posted by: Troll Feeder agrees with the OP at October 09, 2013 10:48 AM (bx2M/)
Posted by: Sabre Rattler at October 09, 2013 10:49 AM (3GuQx)
Until the second term of Barack Obama, I honestly never worried about tyranny here.
"They'll simply refuse to obey," I thought, "because they understand the value of freedom. The government can call for whatever craziness it wants, but the foot soldiers will say 'Fuck you. I'm not doing that to my fellow citizens.'"
I was wrong. It CAN happen here. There's no shortage of people willing to strap on guns and enforce tyrannical laws. The reason is us-versus-them.
Everyone in the government is now on one side, and the rest of us are on the other. It turns out that human nature is human nature everywhere, even here. All federal workers see us as the enemy. We threaten their bennies, so we need to be intimidated into obedience.
The only solution is to emasculate the federal government. Reduce it down to almost zero. Simply put, people can't be trusted with power, so we need to take it away from them.
Posted by: Tacky Adhesive at October 09, 2013 10:49 AM (81H5s)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 10:49 AM (4df7R)
I'm totally imagining Bugs-Bunny-dressed-as-a-baby.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 09, 2013 10:50 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Fritz at October 09, 2013 10:50 AM (UzPAd)
Posted by: tasker at October 09, 2013 10:50 AM (r2PLg)
This is a good one, Ace.
Posted by: Damn Sockpuppet at October 09, 2013 10:50 AM (YmPwQ)
10 It's time for the three year old to throw a tantrum and kick the trustee in the testicles.
Posted by: Roy at October 09, 2013 02:39 PM (VndSC)
Mooch ain't gonna like it, people be kicking at her purse.
Posted by: Troll Feeder agrees with the OP at October 09, 2013 10:50 AM (bx2M/)
Posted by: David Brooks at October 09, 2013 10:50 AM (Pr6hk)
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at October 09, 2013 10:51 AM (xdC/M)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 09, 2013 10:51 AM (a4Omg)
Posted by: polynikes at October 09, 2013 10:51 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 09, 2013 10:51 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: Insanity at October 09, 2013 10:51 AM (QgAFR)
@57
You're thinking too rationally. Besides, I think this would only incur ordinary scrutiny (or the rational basis test) which laws hardly ever fail, and that's assuming it makes it that far because it could always receive the "political question" punt.
Someone like the private colonial farm or person who has a business closed down would be a better litigant because they could show actual pecuniary damages.
Posted by: Jollyroger at October 09, 2013 10:52 AM (t06LC)
6 The definition of divided property interests you describe is called the "bundle of sticks."
I shit you not. Your "unified ownership interest" does sound more scientific.
Posted by: Jollyroger at October 09, 2013 02:38 PM (t06LC)
"Unified ownership interest" does a better job of conveying the idea, I think.
Posted by: Troll Feeder agrees with the OP at October 09, 2013 10:52 AM (bx2M/)
Posted by: Weirddave at October 09, 2013 10:52 AM (jt8G9)
It's almost like Barry's *trying* to get impeached or force a Constitutional crisis or something. I mean-- the optics are so bad, he has to know that he's going too far, right?
Or, yeah, combination of bubble, ego, etc.
Posted by: Lance McCormick at October 09, 2013 10:52 AM (zgHLA)
Posted by: RiverRat at October 09, 2013 10:52 AM (k3CwT)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 09, 2013 10:52 AM (g1DWB)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 09, 2013 10:52 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Mr. Feverhead at October 09, 2013 10:53 AM (SzAZ7)
Posted by: Insanity at October 09, 2013 10:53 AM (QgAFR)
Posted by: Tacky Adhesive at October 09, 2013 02:49 PM (81H5s)
-
That is exactly right. Government is sometimes a necessary evil, but it is always an evil. The solution is to restrict government to only those items which are absolutely necessary, which is about 10% of what they are involved in today.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at October 09, 2013 10:53 AM (U292F)
Posted by: bonhomme at October 09, 2013 10:53 AM (yETln)
"During the campaign, George Lucas once famously suggested that Barack Obama was a Jedi Knight, a fictional mystic warrior depicted in the Star Wars series. As recently as February 12th, during a Lincoln celebration at Ford's Theater, George Lucas favorably compared President Barack Obama to his signature character, Luke Skywalker."
Gagged me much, that did. The stupid is strong with this one.
Posted by: Yoda at October 09, 2013 10:54 AM (0HooB)
I just don't know. Absolute best case might be half living up to their oaths, and even that might be optimistic. It would be bloody, very, very bloody.
I can assure you, that the Marines our son served with would never turn on the citizenry. No way in hell.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 10:54 AM (lVPtV)
Posted by: AmishDude at October 09, 2013 10:54 AM (T0NGe)
polls been showing that since the 1950s ( when the first nationwide political polls were conducted--originally piggybacked on consumer polls asking people which laundry detergent they liked, etc
Polls up through the 80s showed that those who care the most about politics know the most, but for the past decade or two there's been a change---the rise of the Young Incoherent Left, where mostly young people care a lot and allegedly do a lot, but don't know Sh*t
Hello, Chad H from Chattanooga.
Posted by: Major _______ de Coverly at October 09, 2013 10:54 AM (omBWL)
I know it's been said before, not just by me, but these private businesses that are being closed down by the NPS just because they lease federal land should sue the pants off the government for the loss of revenue, the emotional wear and tear, the refunds they've been forced to issue in light of their business being illegally shuttered. And yes, I know the government has no money but what it gets from the taxpayers; but fuck that. Make that part of the point. Drive that home HARD. "They said they did it to save money. Well they didn't. And now YOUR money, Joe Schmoe and Cindy Lou Taxpayer, is going to be used to pay for their illegal actions. YOUR MONEY."
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 10:54 AM (4df7R)
26 Okay, that's interesting. So who would have standing to sue over this? Anybody? How would you force the Interior department to relent? What recourse do the people have? Not rhetorical questions, by the way. Could somebody make them pay?
Posted by: joncelli at October 09, 2013 02:43 PM (RD7QR)
They should not "pay."
They should each, individually, and every one do time in jail.
Posted by: Troll Feeder is justifiably vindictive at October 09, 2013 10:55 AM (bx2M/)
Posted by: AmishDude at October 09, 2013 10:55 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Lance McCormick at October 09, 2013 10:55 AM (zgHLA)
Posted by: dogfish at October 09, 2013 10:55 AM (nsOJa)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 09, 2013 10:55 AM (Nk0AM)
1. Benghazi - multiple people killed including an ambassador and a ton of advanced weapons stolen. Incompetence and perjury involved.
2. Fast and Furious - Illegal transfer of guns across the border to drug lords. Mutiple people killed including a border guard. Again incompetence, perjury, and stonewalling involved.
3. IRS/et al targeting conservative groups on the Obama "enemies list". One of the Nixon impeachment charges for just having the list. What did Obama do? Promote the guilty parties and give them a golden parachute retirement.
And the list goes on, these are the ones off the top of my head that are much worse than this one.
Posted by: Vic at October 09, 2013 10:56 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami at October 09, 2013 10:56 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 09, 2013 10:56 AM (Nk0AM)
Posted by: RS at October 09, 2013 10:56 AM (YAGV/)
>>They took every single one of those used cars which could've been used by the young or working poor and destroyed the engines by pouring sodium silicate into the gas tank and ran the engine until it was irrevocably ruined.
.
.And that made the value of my 2004 Corolla with 150,000 miles on it $4,000 dollars when I sold it and not the $1,000 it should have been. I made a bundle off that car.
Posted by: Registered Voter at October 09, 2013 10:56 AM (AHX9J)
Posted by: Scott M at October 09, 2013 10:57 AM (AdBfq)
>>>Instead, we got the NPS SWAT team. But please, let's give the federal govt even more power.
Hah. You know? I was thinking of all those idiot Survivalist types what plan on strapping on a backpack and 'livin off the land' when the SHTF and all - it just cracked me up
Posted by: Bigby's Chocolatey Fingers at October 09, 2013 10:57 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Scott M at October 09, 2013 10:57 AM (AdBfq)
**
It really is breath taking. Whats worse is that the average lefty has no qualms with this or as Ace said is just too ignorant or arrogant to realize the problem here.
Posted by: dananjcon at October 09, 2013 10:57 AM (wmU4G)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 09, 2013 10:57 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: tasker at October 09, 2013 10:57 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: entropy at October 09, 2013 10:57 AM (TULs6)
Disney Corp is a major sucker of SCOAMF dick. CEO campaigned for him; they're big promoters of Obamacare and of Mooch's food bullying.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 09, 2013 10:57 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Weirddave at October 09, 2013 10:58 AM (jt8G9)
If the owners of the Natural Bridge wanted to close their gates and shut down their hotel during peak season and put up a big barrier with guard dogs so no one can get near the bridge or even see it from the ground, or hike the trails leading to it, they have a perfect right to do so. (We would still be able to fly over and look at it from the air.) There might be some legal complications in canceling long-standing reservations, but, as long as they have the fine print on their side, they're clear there, too. They don't have to let anyone see their giant rock with the big hole in it, or stay in their hotel, or enter their property, if they don't want to, because they own them, not in trust in for anyone else, but free and clear.
The NPS just acts as if they own the national parks, when in fact we (taxpayers) own them and they work for us.
Anyway, I just thought you might like an example of a very similar park that is in fact owned by those who operate it.
Posted by: Dr. Weevil at October 09, 2013 10:58 AM (z3eU6)
Posted by: Stinger at October 09, 2013 10:58 AM (XNawE)
he knows the press will cover his ass
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 09, 2013 10:58 AM (8sCoq)
@91
I'd say Obama does remind me of one of George's Jedi Knights: Anakin.
No not the cool version with the breathing apparatti, or even the version which got laid with Natile Portman. The whiny annoying kid Anakin.
Either that or Jar Jar.
Posted by: Jollyroger at October 09, 2013 10:58 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 09, 2013 10:58 AM (ZPrif)
Someone noted something in a comment to the San Francisco paper - George Lucas/Disney operates on Federal land controlled by the National Park Service in the San Francisco Presidio.
I read that story, or at least a synopsis of it. There's also a high end hotel that was left alone. The excuse given was that these establishments/businesses didn't cost the federal govt anything.
In other words, hypocrisy for politics.
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at October 09, 2013 10:58 AM (0IhFx)
OFA is though, they have a commercial blaming the Barry-cades on the Tea Party.
Posted by: Ian S. at October 09, 2013 10:58 AM (B/VB5)
Seriously, who on this blog is ready to file suit for a breach of fiduciary duty??!!
That would be epic.
Posted by: prescient11 at October 09, 2013 10:59 AM (tVTLU)
It's no different than cops and judges accepting bribes.
They are using their position of authority--loaned to them by the people--for a personal benefit. That benefit being the ever growing government. For as long as the government grows, there will be more and more money for themselves.
They have been told they are "non-essential." That means they could (and now, should) be fired, done away with.
And they are using their trust to extort for themselves the safety of their own financial comfort and welfare.
Taking from us for them.
Posted by: RoyalOil at October 09, 2013 10:59 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: tasker at October 09, 2013 10:59 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: |_+\ at October 09, 2013 10:59 AM (+hhsZ)
Posted by: nothinglefttolose at October 09, 2013 10:59 AM (QbKVX)
Posted by: Lance McCormick at October 09, 2013 11:00 AM (zgHLA)
Posted by: tasker at October 09, 2013 11:00 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 09, 2013 11:01 AM (ZPrif)
Might be why they're using non-military employees--NPS, SEIU, teachers, etc--as the goon squad.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 09, 2013 11:01 AM (/kI1Q)
National Park Service removing the handles from water fountains located on trails.
http://tinyurl.com/kdagda6
Have this dim bulbs of evil thugs pondered what happens if say a jogger collapses and dies?
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 09, 2013 11:01 AM (ObMtJ)
(A libertarian gets out a coin and flips it.)
Why do you need to know which fork I'm going to take? Am I being detained?
Posted by: Gus Bailey at October 09, 2013 11:01 AM (SywTK)
Posted by: CarolT at October 09, 2013 11:01 AM (z4WKX)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe
You forgot the part where Diane Feinstein's husband makes a commission off the sale.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 09, 2013 11:01 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: tasker at October 09, 2013 11:01 AM (r2PLg)
"I always thought journalism was an easy major. I didn't know that you are all Philosopher Kings who know more about everything than everyone else."
I don't remember exactly what the video was about, but I do remember that the female character was a journalist explaining that some stories need to be pushed and some need to be buried, and the male character asked how they knew which ones deserved which treatment before saying the above comment.
Posted by: mr_jack at October 09, 2013 11:02 AM (TMG3G)
Posted by: Grey Fox at October 09, 2013 11:02 AM (sfIVg)
Posted by: JackStraw at October 09, 2013 11:02 AM (g1DWB)
If indeed he is a lawyer, I can only conclude that Obama allows such illegal actions to occur not due to ignorance but due to malice.
I've always assumed it's both. An affirmative action fucktard that thinks he knows much more than he does, and doesn't give a flying fuck about violating the laws that he may or may not understand correctly.
So I'm guessing when he does follow the law, it's usually by accident.
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at October 09, 2013 11:02 AM (NF2Bf)
Posted by: Boss Moss former editor of the Harvard Law Review at October 09, 2013 11:02 AM (uu42x)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 09, 2013 11:02 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: tasker at October 09, 2013 11:02 AM (r2PLg)
Posted by: Eton Cox at October 09, 2013 11:02 AM (q177U)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 09, 2013 11:03 AM (a4Omg)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2013 11:03 AM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Soona at October 09, 2013 11:03 AM (3Mz5/)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 09, 2013 11:03 AM (/Crba)
The media has several reasons for not giving any play to shutdown theater. The first is obviously simple partisanship -- they know Obama is a weak president, they all support Obama, and they want him to "win" in the current fight, as the summer and fall have been dominated by nothing but high-profile failures, embarrassments, climbdowns, and reversals."
What amazes me about this is that you know Obama WANTS them to cover it. He wouldn't be going through all these theatrics, closing private businesses and barricading public spaces, if he didn't want it to be SEEN. He wants the MFM to report on how the "evil RethugliKKKans" are making these places close because the evil RethugliKKKans are the ones who caused the shut down.
But the MFM knows that won't fly. There are enough old hags and crotchety old bastards in the MFM to remember past shut downs, and they know that what Obammy is doing is above and beyond the level of any other shut down before. So they're trying to shelter him from his own ineptitude, which in turn is causing him and his flunkies to ratchet up the outrages.
We'll be lucky to live through it.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 11:03 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at October 09, 2013 11:03 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: AmishDude at October 09, 2013 11:03 AM (T0NGe)
National Park Service removing the handles from water fountains located on trails.
http://tinyurl.com/kdagda6
I'm going to need to take up sniffing glue. It's the only way.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 11:04 AM (lVPtV)
I suspect it's because people who identify themselves as Republicans or Democrats have a "team" with "players" and are thus more likely to follow the team stars. People who follow football know a lot about football; since I don't, I know only the bare fraction of the rules that the non-football crowd would come in contact with.
Posted by: Null at October 09, 2013 11:04 AM (xjpRj)
Yes, and it is terrifying, the true solution is to make every civil servant with a gun just as terrified of violating civil rights as we are terrified of them "Just following orders."
The most absolutely ironic thing about all of this is that the great-great grand children of slaves and freedmen and freedwomen who lived in terror of night riders, Sherriffsm and other lawmen are now among the ones who have no problem with this--because Obama, historic first Black POTUS trumps everything. Same goes for grandchildren of Holocaust survivors who think this is no big deal. And so on and so forth.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 09, 2013 11:04 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: Muad'dib at October 09, 2013 11:04 AM (KjlbF)
Ace has argued here that he has an inalienable right to control his property as he sees fit. A libertarian would agree. This is where Rand Paul got into a bit of a spot, when he argued that the 1965 Civil Rights Act took away this right.
And he's right. (Ace and Rand)
Posted by: GnuBreed at October 09, 2013 11:04 AM (wNF3N)
A more realistic version.
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at October 09, 2013 11:04 AM (epxV4)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 09, 2013 03:01 PM (ObMtJ)
*clearing throat*
"The jogger shouldn't ahve been jogging in that area, since it is on federal land and thus closed due to the shut down."
Just channeling my inner gubmint asshole.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 11:05 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2013 11:05 AM (9XBK2)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 09, 2013 11:05 AM (a4Omg)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at October 09, 2013 11:05 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 09, 2013 11:05 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: X at October 09, 2013 11:05 AM (KHo8t)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 09, 2013 11:05 AM (XvHmy)
Posted by: CarolT at October 09, 2013 11:06 AM (z4WKX)
Posted by: Boss Moss former editor of the Harvard Law Review at October 09, 2013 11:06 AM (uu42x)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 09, 2013 11:06 AM (DmNpO)
And the number of flip-flopper is very low. I have heard numbers as low as < 5% of the voters. Independents almost always vote for one party or the other.
Posted by: Vic at October 09, 2013 11:06 AM (zZbNF)
Posted by: Weirddave at October 09, 2013 11:07 AM (jt8G9)
I agree that this post is a good one but as someone said above, if the tables were turned from Democrat to Republican doing these things, the intentional obtuseness would disappear and the media would be quoting case precedent and law more than a Supreme Court Justice on speed.
Posted by: polynikes at October 09, 2013 11:07 AM (m2CN7)
One other thing. The NPS has premanently damaged itself by going along with this tyrannical behavior. Their greeny feel-good militant enviromentalist attitudes were eroding my faith in them at a rapid rate, but now they're dead to me.
Posted by: Soona at October 09, 2013 11:07 AM (3Mz5/)
Posted by: CJR at October 09, 2013 11:07 AM (Vqcn4)
* I will not wear a "star" or be forced into a ghetto to allow myself to be controlled
* I will not get in line and get on the cattle car
* I will not tamely strip and go into the gas chamber
If you want this old bird, you have to follow your orders and come and get me, but, be advised, I may bite, kick, scratch, claw, shoot, or otherwise resist.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 09, 2013 11:08 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: Boss Moss former editor of the Harvard Law Review at October 09, 2013 11:08 AM (uu42x)
Posted by: Jollyroger at October 09, 2013 02:38 PM (t06LC)
Fee Simple Absolute.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Outrage Outlet has Petulance and Tantrums in all styles and colors! at October 09, 2013 11:08 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: darelf at October 09, 2013 11:08 AM (Z1WKS)
Posted by: Czar Peter at October 09, 2013 11:08 AM (4LI4E)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami at October 09, 2013 11:08 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 09, 2013 11:09 AM (a4Omg)
Posted by: Andy at October 09, 2013 11:09 AM (6Y9v5)
Posted by: AE at October 09, 2013 11:09 AM (sSKe8)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2013 11:09 AM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Vic at October 09, 2013 03:06 PM (zZbNF)
Then they really can't be considered independent by their actions. They are IINOs.
Posted by: polynikes at October 09, 2013 11:09 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at October 09, 2013 11:09 AM (83xuc)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 09, 2013 11:10 AM (IXrOn)
>>WTF? WTF? WTF? WTF? WTF? WTF? WTF?
National Park Service removing the handles from water fountains located on trails.
http://tinyurl.com/kdagda6
Have this dim bulbs of evil thugs pondered what happens if say a jogger collapses and dies?
.
.That's why you should always carry a Gerber multi-tool.
Posted by: Registered Voter at October 09, 2013 11:10 AM (A6Gpk)
Has anyone found out how many rounds the NPS has? Perhaps while we worried over DHS purchases, the NPS has been equipped with Strykers.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 09, 2013 11:10 AM (ObMtJ)
Posted by: AmishDude at October 09, 2013 11:10 AM (T0NGe)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 09, 2013 11:10 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: steevy
That which is not recited is forgotten.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at October 09, 2013 11:10 AM (ooEwf)
Posted by: CarolT at October 09, 2013 11:11 AM (z4WKX)
it's called Xtranormal and it's free to use. Here's one I made:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zj6Au77jaoc
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 09, 2013 11:11 AM (8sCoq)
It changed the price not the VALUE.
So the Ds spent 3000$ of our money for your car and you didn't even vote for them. Obviously we should put them in charge of more things.
Posted by: DaveA at October 09, 2013 11:11 AM (DL2i+)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2013 03:09 PM (9XBK2)
Yes but we will never know for sure because that is like saying if Billy Graham snorted coke and hired hookers his congregation would rebuke him.
Posted by: polynikes at October 09, 2013 11:11 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: CrabbyOldBat at October 09, 2013 11:11 AM (ZVKoE)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at October 09, 2013 11:11 AM (/PCJa)
Same for me, Soona. If you are going to act like the Gestapo, I'm going to treat you like the Gestapo.
Posted by: Tex Lovera at October 09, 2013 11:12 AM (wtvvX)
Posted by: Weirddave at October 09, 2013 03:07 PM (jt8G9)
Actually, the Corp(se) is probably the least-PC of the military. Sequestration affected training (no fuel, not enough weapons). And having a Marxist for president didn't help.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 11:12 AM (lVPtV)
Its not that they don't know, but they don't want to know, they don't care to ask, to dig, to study.
As is with most of their storylines, they know if they ask they might find something that does not fit their political narrative. They are Anti-Journalists.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at October 09, 2013 11:12 AM (sj9LN)
NBC: Pentagon reaches deal to allow Fisher House to temporarily pay the $100,000 death benefit to families of fallen service members
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at October 09, 2013 11:12 AM (ooEwf)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 09, 2013 11:12 AM (NKBxV)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 09, 2013 11:12 AM (a4Omg)
We are at the breaking point. The president has demonstrated to the whole world he can't figure out foreign relations. The Democrats have spent us to prostration. The country is politically divided. Without an election we won't see clarity soon.
So, when does China shoot at a Japanese patrol boat? When does Russia mass troops on the Ukraine border? You know these guys can barely contain their aspirations for dominance of other countries in the best of times, and these aren't the best of times.
You know its only a matter of time before the U.S. is put into a very difficult position, probably having to decide between world war and defense of a critical ally, and that won't end well. The big bad dudes (as opposed to the clowns we are used to dealing with, like Assad or the various members of the Kim family) are the ones who will push us all over the edge.
Posted by: MTF at October 09, 2013 11:13 AM (B5y+v)
Posted by: brak at October 09, 2013 11:14 AM (M2qTM)
Anyone else think Ace is maybe giving them too much credit by imagining they would even arrive at the Starbucks analogy?
Yes. Ace's argument is great, but I think the analogy the MFM would come to -- if indeed their skittering mouse brains were capable of thougth -- would be more like this:
>> That person owns their home. They can do what they want in their home.
>> The federal government owns federal land. They can do what they want on federal land.
Full stop.
No it doesn't make sense. Yes it's far too simplistic. That's why it's what the media believes.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 11:14 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Boss Moss former editor of the Harvard Law Review at October 09, 2013 11:14 AM (uu42x)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2013 11:14 AM (9XBK2)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at October 09, 2013 11:15 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 09, 2013 11:15 AM (ObMtJ)
Posted by: Null at October 09, 2013 11:15 AM (xjpRj)
Posted by: SCOTUS at October 09, 2013 11:16 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: Boss Moss former editor of the Harvard Law Review at October 09, 2013 11:16 AM (uu42x)
Posted by: brak at October 09, 2013 03:14 PM (M2qTM)
Jeebus. Some NSA goon just passed that idea along.
And TFG just mentioned The Middle Class. Fucking bastard.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 11:16 AM (lVPtV)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 09, 2013 11:16 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at October 09, 2013 11:16 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: blindside at October 09, 2013 11:16 AM (WzWmY)
What the hell is next?
The paramilitary wing of the National Parks Service has placed quad-50 antiaircraft installations around Old Faithful in order to prevent the surreptitious snapping of photographs by tourists in slow moving Cessna 152's and hot air balloons.
"No son-of-a-bitch transgressing picture takers are gonna enjoy the image of Old Faithful as long as I'm President of the United States and John Boehner refuses to kiss my ring," said Barack Obama yesterday. Harry Reid has promised to support the President and made it "perfectly clear" that his Democratic colleagues are in complete lock-step with the Commander-in-Chief. "We are here to punish anyone - Japs, Koreans, Americans and anyone else who thinks that looking at Old Faithful is free," said Harry Reid. "Those damn Republicans have shut down Old Faithful and that means no one is going to get close enough to even sniff that national monument. We have commissioned the Army Corps of Engineers to make a really big cork and we plan to plug Old Faithful as soon as possible," Reid said.
Until the really big cork can be installed, Nancy Pelosi offered to sit astride Old Faithful acknowledging that her hideousness would repel all but the most stalwart of geyser-peekers and snap shot takers. "I'm willing to make this sacrifice because I love Barack Obama and hate those fucking Republicans," Pelosi is quoted as saying.
NPS officials did admit they were having a difficult time convincing the bison that due to the disastrous and devastating effects of the government shut down caused by the Republicans the grass of Yellowstone could no longer be eaten. "If the bison continue to eat grass that is not paid for we are going to be forced to shoot them," said an NPS official. "We will do what is necessary," he continued, "and have commissioned the manufacture of 3.5 million rounds of 300 Winchester Magnum with the image of Ted Cruz embossed on the casing. "That should get the job done," said the official.
Elsewhere on park land, the construction of 700 luxury condominiums continued unabated because the project has been designated for illegal aliens. "This project has not been impacted by the calculated and dastardly Republican shut down of the Federal Government due to the fact that the rights of illegal aliens are protected by the Constitution." said the project's manager. "The airstrip will be finished on time for feliz-navidad and we can begin transporting illegal Mexicans to their new condominiums and they will not have to suffer the risks of trekking across the dangerous border areas." the official said. "It is only right," he continued.
A generalissimo with the paramilitary wing of the National Parks Service was optimistic that the present impasse would be resolved very soon. "Republicans will soon realize that the American people are going to hold them responsible for holding a gun to the President's head and demanding that the Federal Government stop spending money like a drunken sailor on shore leave. And I have it on good authority that Barack Obama is ready to sign an executive order cancelling Thanksgiving and Christmas and all birthday parties, if necessary, if the Republicans don't get back where they belong, stop causing trouble and give Obama every single thing he wants. After all, he is the first black, well, half-black anyway, President," he said.
Posted by: Chamber Pot Party at October 09, 2013 11:17 AM (pXRt2)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 09, 2013 11:17 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at October 09, 2013 11:17 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: RWC at October 09, 2013 11:17 AM (fWAjv)
National Park Service removing the handles from water fountains located on trails.
http://tinyurl.com/kdagda6
Have this dim bulbs of evil thugs pondered what happens if say a jogger collapses and dies?
***
So its safe to say that all these park rangers tree licking bark humping hippies who went into park service the save mother gaia.
I mean there is not ONE!! comander out there that has the balls to tells these drones to stand down!!?? WTF?!
Posted by: dananjcon at October 09, 2013 11:17 AM (wmU4G)
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 09, 2013 11:17 AM (l5zzX)
Posted by: brak at October 09, 2013 11:18 AM (M2qTM)
Posted by: X at October 09, 2013 11:18 AM (KHo8t)
My grandfather owned at least 300 rifles. The chances of him using them for nefarious purposes were zero. He recognized the great responsibility in owning guns.
My brother-in-law took me shooting once. He had a .45 M1911 he'd just bought. He put in the magazine, shot six times, and then pulled out the mag, leaving a live round in the chamber. I stood behind him as he fucked around until he realized that there was still a round in the chamber. He then ejected it, like, "I meant to do that."
He's an army veteran. I'm a civilian. He talks constantly about the need to have mass executions here. He also lied about his service, telling me he was a sapper and that he went on secret missions in Nicaragua. Utter fucking bullshit. He was in the maintenance pool in South Korea.
I honestly don't know what's in the minds of most cops and members of the armed forces. Our values have degraded so radically I don't know what would happen if King Putt gave the order to mow down all the "Teabaggers" who are going to descend on DC om the 13th.
Most would refuse, but how many would comply?
Posted by: Tacky Adhesive at October 09, 2013 11:18 AM (81H5s)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at October 09, 2013 11:18 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: Boss Moss former editor of the Harvard Law Review at October 09, 2013 03:16 PM (uu42x)
He's talking AGAIN? FFS
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 11:19 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 09, 2013 11:19 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: Lauren at October 09, 2013 11:19 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 11:19 AM (lVPtV)
Bring mini-ViseGrips. They'll do the job
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 09, 2013 11:19 AM (l5zzX)
Posted by: mrp at October 09, 2013 11:19 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: J. Random Dude at October 09, 2013 11:19 AM (72afg)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami at October 09, 2013 11:19 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 09, 2013 11:19 AM (/Crba)
...no, never mind. They still wouldn't be up in arms.
President Obama has taken the first step in using the military against U.S. Citizens on a large scale.
As I'm writing this, I'm getting this nagging, tinfoil hat suspicion that prolonged government shutdown would be the perfect opportunity for a coup.
That sounded farfetched when I thought about writing it down...it doesn't so much now.
Posted by: SGT York at October 09, 2013 11:20 AM (FqBlL)
Tell me they are doing this. Lie to me if necessary.
Posted by: Muad'dib at October 09, 2013 11:20 AM (KjlbF)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 03:17 PM (lVPtV)
We are all mute buttons now. All ages, races, religions, we have all been pushed to be MUTE and let our dear Emperor Obama rule by fiat and decree.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 09, 2013 11:20 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: Czar Peter at October 09, 2013 11:20 AM (4LI4E)
They stopped a potential VBIED in the most target dense zone of the GWOT.
Posted by: DaveA at October 09, 2013 11:20 AM (DL2i+)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2013 11:20 AM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Timmay! at October 09, 2013 11:21 AM (ipirO)
For some reason he couldn't get hamsterdance.com to load.
LOfuckingL
Posted by: Tex Lovera at October 09, 2013 11:21 AM (wtvvX)
Posted by: fluffy at October 09, 2013 11:21 AM (0hXna)
Which is why it had to die. Can't have families improving their own situation any way but a government check.
*spit*
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 09, 2013 11:21 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 09, 2013 03:19 PM (/Crba)
Nominating Yellen.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 09, 2013 11:21 AM (kXoT0)
"Campsite Conservation With Your New M1 Abrams"
"Tourists/Terrorists: Letting Gaia Sort Them Out"
"Wadcutters or Hollow-Points: A Panel Discussion"
"Foreign Tourists: Hostages or POWs?"
Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at October 09, 2013 11:22 AM (/lWM8)
http://www.ufunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/sexy-supergirl-cosplay-01.jpg
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 09, 2013 11:22 AM (ObMtJ)
Posted by: RWC at October 09, 2013 11:22 AM (fWAjv)
Take that, TSA goons. Oh, and he was getting the full pat-down in Seattle and a robe-wearing goat-fucker breezed through security. He glared at the TSA thug and said, "Noted."
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 11:22 AM (lVPtV)
For many people, a minimum security Federal prison would be a significant lifestyle upgrade. Regular food, clean clothing, medical care, etc.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 09, 2013 11:22 AM (l5zzX)
Posted by: Muad'dib at October 09, 2013 03:20 PM (KjlbF)
They're running five separate commercials on it now in various local markets. Unfortunately not scheduled to run in your area until a couple of weeks.
Posted by: polynikes at October 09, 2013 11:23 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: blindside at October 09, 2013 11:23 AM (WzWmY)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 09, 2013 03:21 PM (kXoT0)
The stimulus must flow.
Posted by: Barack Obama, Guild Steersman at October 09, 2013 11:23 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 09, 2013 11:24 AM (/Crba)
http://anpr.org/rr36-2013.htm
Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at October 09, 2013 11:24 AM (/lWM8)
Yellowstone is absolutely super-colossal in size, and it's also situated in the middle of some of the most rugged terrain in North America. Those mountains are not abundant in interstate highways.
Very frequently, for people living in the parts of the states surrounding and incorporating Yellowstone, THE only reasonable road route from A to B is driving through the park. Any Internet mapping engine will demonstrate this.
You can go around it, to be sure, with tremendous delay and inconvenience. And lots of extra money spent on fuel and wear and tear.
But then again, everything abutting Yellowstone is a red state. So to Obama and his crew, imposing those costs and annoyances on the locals is a feature, not a bug.
Posted by: torquewrench at October 09, 2013 11:24 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: John Smith at October 09, 2013 11:24 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 09, 2013 03:21 PM (kXoT0)
The stimulus must flow.
Posted by: Barack Obama, Guild Steersman at October 09, 2013 03:23 PM (RD7QR)
And apparently, ugly old Dem women gotz to be in charge of every damn thing.
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 09, 2013 11:24 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at October 09, 2013 11:24 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 09, 2013 03:19 PM (/Crba)
Good. Let him keep flapping his gums.
Someone help me. Who does Yellen remind you of? It's driving me crazy.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 11:24 AM (lVPtV)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at October 09, 2013 11:25 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at October 09, 2013 11:25 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami at October 09, 2013 11:25 AM (bCEmE)
I wish Jim Hoft was healthy, he could be all over that like that Breitbart.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 09, 2013 11:25 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: steevy
10 - 15% of the Left, that willful, malicious part of the Left, hopes the administration's actions will push someone over the edge.
Obama himself has no concept of what he is doing, but some in the administration want an incident to justify a crackdown on the Right. The script has played out many times in the past in other countries.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at October 09, 2013 11:26 AM (ooEwf)
Posted by: @JohnTant at October 09, 2013 11:26 AM (eytER)
Posted by: Not the KGB at October 09, 2013 11:26 AM (0cMkb)
>>I honestly don't know what's in the minds of most cops and members of the armed forces. Our values have degraded so radically I don't know what would happen if King Putt gave the order to mow down all the "Teabaggers" who are going to descend on DC om the 13th.
Most would refuse, but how many would comply?
.
.I can think of only a few that I served with over 22 years that would comply with a "fire on that crowd" order. A couple of them would do it without a seconds hesitation, but the vast majority would not IMO.
Posted by: Registered Voter at October 09, 2013 11:26 AM (AHX9J)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 03:24 PM (lVPtV)
Dolores Umbridge?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 11:26 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 09, 2013 11:26 AM (a4Omg)
Posted by: stutterk at October 09, 2013 11:26 AM (z6eaQ)
She's made of rubber!
I don't want to get banned, so I won't post a link. Go to Liveleak and watch the X-rated cartoon all these Disney animators made for their own amusement in the late twenties. Unbelievable.
It's called "Eveready Harton."
Posted by: Tacky Adhesive at October 09, 2013 11:26 AM (81H5s)
Posted by: So Cal Jim at October 09, 2013 11:26 AM (NG7MG)
Posted by: brak at October 09, 2013 03:26 PM (M2qTM)
ding ding ding You are right!
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 11:27 AM (lVPtV)
Posted by: Ben Richards, supposed Butcher Of Bakersfield at October 09, 2013 11:27 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: John Smith at October 09, 2013 11:28 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: So Cal Jim at October 09, 2013 11:28 AM (NG7MG)
They took every single one of those used cars which could've been used by the young or working poor and destroyed the engines by pouring sodium silicate into the gas tank and ran the engine until it was irrevocably ruined.
Why?
Because fuck you.
They could have donated many of those vehicles to charity....at zero additional cost to the govt. I still remember watching a youtube video of people destroying late model vehicles in perfect condition....for no other reason than Obumbles wanted to help GM sell more cars. Fuck charity. Fuck the working poor. Fuck you, America.
This govt does not represent the people, and they've made it crystal clear that they do not consider themselves public servants.
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at October 09, 2013 11:28 AM (0IhFx)
Posted by: Boss Moss former editor of the Harvard Law Review at October 09, 2013 11:29 AM (uu42x)
Posted by: Lauren at October 09, 2013 11:29 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at October 09, 2013 11:29 AM (dfYL9)
Posted by: John Smith at October 09, 2013 11:30 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2013 11:30 AM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 09, 2013 11:30 AM (ObMtJ)
Posted by: GeneTheBigLib at October 09, 2013 11:31 AM (sWz+2)
Posted by: Liberty Lover at October 09, 2013 11:31 AM (encrR)
Good explanation, Ace. I would use this, the trustee concept to argue with my lefty friends, if they were talking about this stuff, which they aren't.
Why?
You know why. Instead, they are are extolling the virtues of signing up (and getting user names) for the exchanges. Not getting actual insurance of course, but getting through after several tries, and establishing a login with password? Yeppers! You betcha. Praise Obama.
Posted by: BurtTC at October 09, 2013 11:31 AM (TOk1P)
But this? So far, not a *single* report of a park ranger behaving as a human, as a motherfucking AMERICAN, and saying "no" to their superiors? This shocks me. And it really scares me.
On yesterday's Yellowstone thread I asked this:
"what exactly would the NPS have done if one of those tourists had said, "Bugger this," and left the building? Would they have shot him/her? Would they have really raised their gun or their taser and SHOT an innocent person -- probably in the back, mind you -- for having the gall to leave a building to go look at a geological phenomenon on public land in a free country?
I think all these LEOs in the gubmint -- not just NPS -- need to ask themselves that question and then really THINK about what their answer says about them."
With all that's happened in just the last few days, I don't have much faith in our alleged keepers of the peace.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 11:31 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 09, 2013 11:32 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at October 09, 2013 11:32 AM (VtjlW)
However, you forget that convincing the public to vote Democrat is totally in the best interests of the public.
When I went of college in the early 80s the biggest libs on campus were in the forestry programs and wanting to work for NPS/Forest Service. Most of them were expecting to spend several years in unpaid intern like status before getting a job. I think that process serves to weed out the politically incorrect.
Posted by: GeneTheLib at October 09, 2013 11:32 AM (sWz+2)
Posted by: Lauren at October 09, 2013 11:32 AM (ELdpj)
Posted by: CarolT. at October 09, 2013 11:33 AM (z4WKX)
Oops! Yeah, I saw that, Tami. But then, because of the Shutdown, I was unable to post about it. Damn these Republican splodeydopes!
Actually, I was busy tweeting about that meeting and didn't see your comment until after. Anyway, belated thanks.
Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at October 09, 2013 11:33 AM (/lWM8)
Not to mention the large number of GM and Chrysler dealerships, many of them quite profitable, that lost their franchise after Obama bailout.
Posted by: mrp at October 09, 2013 11:33 AM (HjPtV)
http://tinyurl.com/pn3xm4b
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 11:33 AM (lVPtV)
So I am not in the least surprised that the media left completely ignores property rights.
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 09, 2013 11:33 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Boss Moss former editor of the Harvard Law Review at October 09, 2013 11:33 AM (uu42x)
I don't think Ace has a brace of Ocicats though. That's a job requirement
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 09, 2013 11:34 AM (l5zzX)
When does this Yellowstone Movie come out?
It came out years and years ago. Stalag 17 was the title, I think.
Posted by: Sticky Wicket at October 09, 2013 11:35 AM (0IhFx)
Posted by: Ben Richards, supposed Butcher Of Bakersfield at October 09, 2013 11:35 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at October 09, 2013 11:35 AM (VtjlW)
Dem Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee Says “Martial Law” Is Needed To Reopen The Government… http://shar.es/Efztc
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 09, 2013 11:36 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at October 09, 2013 03:32 PM (VtjlW)
I couldn't help it! I just pictured baby!AtC being carried around by someone in a severely stern nanny outfit, waving around a diamond-encrusted rattle and barking orders.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 11:36 AM (4df7R)
Decades ago, we knew the media was liberal, but they had a veneer of trying to appear fair. Now it's in your face partisanship where they don't even pretend anymore.
Posted by: McAdams at October 09, 2013 11:36 AM (WHca6)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2013 11:36 AM (9XBK2)
Posted by: RWC at October 09, 2013 11:36 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: John Smith at October 09, 2013 11:36 AM (wR+pz)
He has a Gogidog, which is an acceptable replacement. (And if you understand why, you're a long-time conservative blog reader).
Posted by: Ian S. at October 09, 2013 11:36 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 09, 2013 11:37 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 09, 2013 11:37 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 03:24 PM (lVPtV)
-
Harry Potter's psycho teacher?
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at October 09, 2013 11:37 AM (U292F)
Posted by: Lauren at October 09, 2013 11:37 AM (ELdpj)
Maybe a good hint was when Obama called for a civilian force as well funded as the military.
Posted by: Thomas Jefferson at October 09, 2013 11:37 AM (Pr6hk)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 09, 2013 11:38 AM (XvHmy)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at October 09, 2013 11:38 AM (qyfb5)
Dem Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee Says “Martial Law” Is Needed To Reopen The Government… http://shar.es/Efztc
Fuck that ugly, evil bitch. I guarandamntee you she'd gladly order Brown Shirts to fire on unarmed, law abiding citizens.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 11:38 AM (lVPtV)
Posted by: Vote Lord Humungus 2016 at October 09, 2013 11:38 AM (HEa5q)
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 09, 2013 03:36 PM (8sCoq)
From the mouths of Medusa-headed imbeciles...
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 11:38 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Aldon Smith at October 09, 2013 11:38 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: Null at October 09, 2013 11:38 AM (xjpRj)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at October 09, 2013 11:38 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: The Political Hat at October 09, 2013 11:38 AM (XvHmy)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at October 09, 2013 11:39 AM (PpENV)
Posted by: Jones in CO
What ... Um ... the fuuuuck?
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at October 09, 2013 11:39 AM (ooEwf)
I am terrified by the fact that I am to the point that I do not consider those members of the NPS who are performing these duties to be my fellow citizens. No. You are not. You are the functionaries of a tyrant and that you claim you are acting on behalf o my country is repugnant.
The split is here. The question is only when the civil war goes fully hot.
=============
Comment I put on the FB:
"We are not subjects; they are not serving the Crown."
Posted by: RoyalOil at October 09, 2013 11:39 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: smitorsky at October 09, 2013 11:39 AM (wsnKp)
By the way, since I wrote a good piece for the first time in 2-3 weeks, I guess this is a good time to say: I'm going on vacation next week. I haven't been off (except for federal holidays) since Christmas/New Years.
I never feel right saying that unless I've done something of value.
Well I did. so now:
VACATION, BEEOTCHES!
WHOO-HOO!!!!
Posted by: ace at October 09, 2013 11:39 AM (/IWYB)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 09, 2013 11:40 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at October 09, 2013 11:40 AM (9+ccr)
Dem Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee Says “Martial Law” Is Needed To Reopen The Government… http://shar.es/Efztc
omg- dredging new depths of stewpid
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 09, 2013 11:40 AM (8sCoq)
http://www.hark.com/clips/shpvyvffdb-overruled
Obama is such a SCOAMF
Posted by: Fuck the Security Guards at October 09, 2013 11:40 AM (NGBna)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 09, 2013 11:40 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at October 09, 2013 11:40 AM (/PCJa)
VACATION, BEEOTCHES!
WHOO-HOO!!!!
Posted by: ace at October 09, 2013 03:39 PM (/IWYB)
Have fun. Just leave the liquor cabinet unlocked.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 11:40 AM (lVPtV)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 09, 2013 11:41 AM (ObMtJ)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 09, 2013 11:41 AM (a4Omg)
To be fair...she'd only order the murder of the white ones.
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 09, 2013 11:41 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at October 09, 2013 11:41 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Boss Moss former editor of the Harvard Law Review at October 09, 2013 11:41 AM (uu42x)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at October 09, 2013 11:41 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2013 11:41 AM (9XBK2)
You know ace, this is one of those times where I wish you had a "share" button so I could post this to facebook.
You might want to look into that
Posted by: Jollyroger at October 09, 2013 11:42 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 09, 2013 11:42 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: non-essential commenter at October 09, 2013 11:42 AM (VwxMb)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 09, 2013 11:42 AM (NKBxV)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 09, 2013 11:42 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at October 09, 2013 11:42 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 11:42 AM (lVPtV)
Posted by: Jazz at October 09, 2013 11:42 AM (roO4n)
VACATION, BEEOTCHES!
WHOO-HOO!!!!
Posted by: ace at October 09, 2013 03:39 PM (/IWYB)
LUCKY.
I hope you're going somewhere/doing something fun! And get lots of rest.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 11:42 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 09, 2013 11:42 AM (ObMtJ)
Posted by: Jollyroger at October 09, 2013 11:42 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: John Smith at October 09, 2013 11:42 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at October 09, 2013 11:43 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: somebody else, not me at October 09, 2013 11:43 AM (29vnO)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2013 11:43 AM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 09, 2013 11:43 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at October 09, 2013 11:43 AM (/lWM8)
Heh. I feel like my current opinion of Libertarians or Libertarianism is also decided by a coin toss.
Posted by: Shoot Me at October 09, 2013 11:43 AM (qiXMt)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 09, 2013 11:43 AM (a4Omg)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at October 09, 2013 11:44 AM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 09, 2013 11:44 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: The Toaster and The Chicken at October 09, 2013 11:44 AM (fWAjv)
By the way, since I wrote a good piece for the first time in 2-3 weeks, I guess this is a good time to say: I'm going on vacation next week. I haven't been off (except for federal holidays) since Christmas/New Years.
I never feel right saying that unless I've done something of value.
Well I did. so now:
VACATION, BEEOTCHES!
WHOO-HOO!!!!
Posted by: ace at October 09, 2013 03:39 PM (/IWYB)
And hobos everywhere tremble...
Posted by: Barack Obama, Guild Steersman at October 09, 2013 11:44 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 09, 2013 11:44 AM (a4Omg)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at October 09, 2013 11:44 AM (VtjlW)
And, it's hard to explain to my mother, who watches those MSM news channels, that they choose what they are going to cover, and they choose how to say it/tone, and they choose what to conveniently leave out. She doesn't get that she is getting half the news, with a biased filter.
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 09, 2013 02:36 PM (IXrOn)
tell me about it, I am up against this everyday.
Posted by: Shoey at October 09, 2013 11:44 AM (jdOk/)
@374
Well, my italicize used to work. I'm not sure what happened. Made it where I do the @ instead of copying and pasting because its too confusing
Posted by: Jollyroger at October 09, 2013 11:44 AM (t06LC)
309 -
Lauren, I think the answer is no, they haven't been able to get beyond setting up login, but honestly, at some point I just stop listening.
Posted by: BurtTC at October 09, 2013 11:45 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: Fox News headline at October 09, 2013 11:45 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at October 09, 2013 03:42 PM (VtjlW)
Maybe not in stature, but in reputation you are! ^_^ I mentioned on the ONT the other night that when we bumped into each other the morning after the MoMee I was all, "OMG OMG OMG she remembers me? OMG OMG she remembers my name? OMG OMG OMG!!"
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 11:45 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at October 09, 2013 11:45 AM (/lWM8)
Obama is the LightWorker. Therefore all light belongs to him. So when you are looking at Mt Rushmore, you are using OBAMA's photons. Obama has every right to deny you the use of his photons if you are not doing His will.
Posted by: The Media at October 09, 2013 11:46 AM (1Rgee)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2013 03:41 PM (9XBK2)
Ace uses his super-secret alias 'Richardo Tempesto' when exiting the U.S.
Posted by: Liberty Lover at October 09, 2013 11:46 AM (encrR)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 09, 2013 11:46 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: blindside at October 09, 2013 11:47 AM (WzWmY)
In fact, owning a phone of any sort is OPTIONAL.
Posted by: Purp[/i][/b][/u][/s] at October 09, 2013 11:47 AM (l5zzX)
Posted by: Jollyroger at October 09, 2013 03:42 PM (t06LC)
Probably not a good idea for an ewok as furry as ace to go hiking anywhere he might be mistaken for a bear. Liable to get himself shot, stuffed and mounted on some Canuck's wall.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 11:47 AM (4df7R)
***
I just listened to the3 radio news. they had a story about that 89 year old guy who was busted with 214 pounds of cocaine. They went out of their way to mention that he was a WWII vet. You know, like those vandals at the Monument.
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 09, 2013 11:47 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 09, 2013 03:46 PM (kXoT0)
Racccisssssssstttttt!
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 11:47 AM (lVPtV)
Posted by: brak at October 09, 2013 11:47 AM (NaTky)
Posted by: RWC at October 09, 2013 11:47 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at October 09, 2013 11:47 AM (/PCJa)
Don't come back here if you're going to see that whore.
Posted by: eleven at October 09, 2013 11:48 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at October 09, 2013 11:48 AM (naUcP)
The doomsday caldera is going to swell up like Obama's sunken chest after a two putt.
Posted by: Fritz at October 09, 2013 11:48 AM (x2W/k)
WHOO-HOO!!!!
Posted by: ace at October 09, 2013 03:39 PM (/IWYB)
***
Be safe. Wear protection and clean underwear.
Pro tip; BJ's has excellent top shelf booze at bargain prices.
Posted by: dananjcon at October 09, 2013 11:48 AM (wmU4G)
Postworthy. The IRS and the Spite House DID share information. On Drudge now. When are the Articles of Impeachment going to be drawn up? This needs to happen or we are no longer a country of laws.
Posted by: Truck Monkey at October 09, 2013 11:48 AM (32Ze2)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at October 09, 2013 11:48 AM (PpENV)
Posted by: The Travel Agent at October 09, 2013 11:49 AM (wR+pz)
Posted by: blindside at October 09, 2013 11:49 AM (WzWmY)
What bothers me is that I haven't seen any blog-lawyers doing the legal analysis to show exactly how this is legal or (I'm pretty sure) illegal. Where are the Volokhs? I took a quick look a couple of days ago and saw nothing. How about Althouse? Legal Insurrection? We need some authoritative legal experts who can say, loudly, exactly what statutes the NPS is violating, what the penalties are, whether these penalties are cumulative, who has standing to sue, and (here's the part that worries me) what the statutes of limitation are on each count.
At that point, we can loudly promise that when Constitutional government is restored in 3 years and 3 months - sooner, if Obama continues or accelerates his obvious slide into tyranny and insanity and gets impeached - these laws will be enforced, and the assholes who have violated them will be identified, fired, deprived of pensions, and (statute of limitation permitting) fined or jailed, with possible exceptions for those who are clever enough to keep incriminating records and nimble enough to be the first to turn state's witness. I certainly hope that any penalties won by (e.g.) busloads of foreign tourists will be taken out of the salaries and pensions of the criminals, rather than tax dollars.
We need to make sure that the bastards are thinking about this every morning when they're deciding whether they want to spend the day shoving great-grandpas in wheelchairs around, or kicking people out of campsites they have already paid for, or whether they'd rather put in an application for early retirement or take extended sick-leave or just get together with the rest of their crew and tell their supervisor "We can't do this - we will all go to jail for it, and you as supervisor will get the longest sentence. Tell your supervisor to tell his supervisor that we can't do it."
Posted by: Dr. Weevil at October 09, 2013 11:49 AM (z3eU6)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at October 09, 2013 11:49 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea at October 09, 2013 03:47 PM (4df7R)
Or "cuddled" by Putin!
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 09, 2013 11:49 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: CarolT. at October 09, 2013 11:49 AM (z4WKX)
Posted by: blindside at October 09, 2013 11:50 AM (WzWmY)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami at October 09, 2013 11:50 AM (bCEmE)
@410
Don't you remember the "Captain America vs. the Evil Tea Party" incident a few years ago. Yeah, fuck that guy. I'm thinking Batman may be our only hope.
But when life gives you Batman, bat the shit out of it.
Posted by: Jollyroger at October 09, 2013 11:51 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: Tami at October 09, 2013 03:50 PM (bCEmE)
Must not fuck with TFG's Muslim Brotherhood.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 11:51 AM (lVPtV)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami at October 09, 2013 11:51 AM (bCEmE)
Have you tried copying the URL and pasting it into the "status update" box?
Posted by: HeatherRadish™ needs a beer at October 09, 2013 11:51 AM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 11:52 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at October 09, 2013 11:52 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 11:52 AM (lVPtV)
Also, the MSM has no expertise in *anything* in my experience. Anytime I have ever read or seen a story in the media that I knew anything about, the media has gotten it wrong in at least one major material aspect (and often in more than one). Consequently, I trust them even less on issues with which I am not familiar.
Posted by: Dancing Queen at October 09, 2013 11:53 AM (FDGeg)
Posted by: The Sundance Kid at October 09, 2013 11:53 AM (/Crba)
For the record, he's a gay Clinton-hack donk from Manhattan, only representing the district with West Point thanks to the state GOP nuking the Republican majority during redistricting and Obama's coattails. Even if the guy does finally do something to distinguish himself for the district, he'll be out on his ass next year.
Posted by: mugiwara at October 09, 2013 11:53 AM (W7ffl)
Figure the odds that the VA would have chosen October 1st as the day to tell me that I am recovered from cancer treatment, and they can now lower my disability level .
The finding is correct, and the level of follow on disability matches my own calculation. So in that respect it's correct.
Just figure the odds that it would be at the same time that the government shuts down.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at October 09, 2013 11:54 AM (xdC/M)
Posted by: steevy at October 09, 2013 11:54 AM (9XBK2)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at October 09, 2013 11:54 AM (qyfb5)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at October 09, 2013 11:54 AM (PpENV)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at October 09, 2013 03:52 PM (VtjlW)
*glomp* I'm glad you did!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 11:54 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes at October 09, 2013 03:46 PM (kXoT0)
aw, you didn't watch the clip. Sheila Jackson Lee thinks 'martial law' means fast-tracking a spending bill.
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 09, 2013 11:54 AM (8sCoq)
Rover, rinse, repeat: Lena Dunham confesses to using dog shampoo on multiple occasions http://bit.ly/15VPLmw
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 09, 2013 11:55 AM (8sCoq)
Posted by: Jollyroger at October 09, 2013 03:42 PM (t06LC)
Are you trying to blow up the blog? The chewing gum has dried out, the boilers are leaking steam and the hamsters haven't been paid in months. One more thing and there'll be a blog-shattering kaboom (not unlike the cereal) and that'll be it.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Outrage Outlet has Petulance and Tantrums in all styles and colors! at October 09, 2013 11:56 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at October 09, 2013 11:56 AM (32Ze2)
Posted by: blaster at October 09, 2013 11:56 AM (W6bkf)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 09, 2013 11:56 AM (ObMtJ)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at October 09, 2013 11:56 AM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Jones in CO at October 09, 2013 03:55 PM (8sCoq)
*will not comment, will not comment will not commentwillnotcomment...!*
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 11:56 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: AllenG (Dedicated Tenther) MFM Delenda Est at October 09, 2013 11:57 AM (/PCJa)
Posted by: rickb223 at October 09, 2013 11:57 AM (NKBxV)
Posted by: Schrödinger's cat [/i] at October 09, 2013 11:57 AM (U2UQk)
Posted by: maddogg at October 09, 2013 11:58 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Spuds McKenzie at October 09, 2013 11:58 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: Spuds McKenzie at October 09, 2013 03:58 PM (/Crba)
"Yo no quiero!"
-Taco Bell Chihauha
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 11:59 AM (4df7R)
But you're not an independent. If you were, you'd vote for a Democrat. When was the last time you voted for a Democrat, or anyone not a member of the GOP?
Posted by: Rogo at October 09, 2013 11:59 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at October 09, 2013 11:59 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at October 09, 2013 11:59 AM (EGPJQ)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at October 09, 2013 12:00 PM (qyfb5)
derrrrrrrp
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 12:00 PM (4df7R)
---
Still wouldn't fuck that bitch, even if I had a keg to myself.
Posted by: Spuds McKenzie at October 09, 2013 03:58 PM (/Crba)
I wouldn't fuck that even if she gave me a shiny new toaster to fuck first.
Posted by: mugiwara at October 09, 2013 12:00 PM (W7ffl)
Posted by: soothsayer at October 09, 2013 12:00 PM (Nk0AM)
Posted by: John Smith at October 09, 2013 12:00 PM (wR+pz)
http://www.ufunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/noir-marko-manev-1.jpg
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 09, 2013 12:01 PM (ObMtJ)
Posted by: John Smith at October 09, 2013 12:01 PM (wR+pz)
Posted by: Foghorn Leghorn at October 09, 2013 03:59 PM (EGPJQ)
I don't think Obammy cares WHO gets shot. But he wants bloodshed.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 12:02 PM (4df7R)
Posted by: Stephen Price Blair at October 09, 2013 12:02 PM (QF8uk)
http://labs.enigma.io/shutdown2013/
Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at October 09, 2013 12:03 PM (/lWM8)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at October 09, 2013 12:03 PM (/Crba)
http://www.ufunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/noir-marko-manev-1.jpg
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 09, 2013 04:01 PM (ObMtJ) [/i]
...
Yeah, that's pretty accurate, actually.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 12:03 PM (4df7R)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at October 09, 2013 12:03 PM (qyfb5)
http://youtu.be/UHbaWs_NOT4
Posted by: Truck Monkey at October 09, 2013 04:03 PM (32Ze2)
heh
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 12:04 PM (lVPtV)
How most people view AlextheChick
http://www.ufunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/noir-marko-manev-1.jpg
---
I would go with "No capes!" instead.
http://ts3.mm.bing.net/th?id=H.4709973979826642&pid=15.1
Put the two together and you've got it.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 12:04 PM (4df7R)
Posted by: alexthechick - Bring the SMOD at October 09, 2013 12:05 PM (VtjlW)
Alan Parson's Project - You Lie Down With Dogs and robo-pron.
http://youtu.be/jag3HwS74pc
Toaster now feels unloved.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at October 09, 2013 12:05 PM (ObMtJ)
MSM, just doing their job.
Everyone needs to make a living, cut them some slack.
Posted by: Big Ben at October 09, 2013 12:06 PM (I5Htn)
I think the JEF is going to keep pushing against the citizens until there is an incident whereby he can declare martial law. I used to think that notion was tinfoil hat time. No more. I put nothing past these fascist cockholsters.
Posted by: real joe at October 09, 2013 12:06 PM (iqs1Q)
Was told to come back in three months and take a written test.
He just used some very colorful language.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 12:07 PM (lVPtV)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit Chelsea [/i][/s][/u][/b] at October 09, 2013 12:07 PM (4df7R)
Posted by: Big Ben at October 09, 2013 04:06 PM (I5Htn)
There were a lot of nazis on trial that would have loved to had your dumb ass on their jury.
Posted by: maddogg at October 09, 2013 12:07 PM (xWW96)
Everyone needs to make a living, cut them some slack.
Only after they have been dangling from the noose for a sufficiently long time.
(Hanging reference not intended literally.)
Posted by: Grey Fox at October 09, 2013 12:08 PM (sfIVg)
Posted by: Filly at October 09, 2013 12:08 PM (Sdl8i)
MSM, just doing their job.
Everyone needs to make a living, cut them some slack.
Posted by: Big Ben at October 09, 2013 04:06 PM (I5Htn)
___________________________
Gestapo, Just doing their job
SS, just doing their job
Guards at Bergen-Belsen, just doing their job.
Everyone needs to make a living, cut them some slack.
Posted by: Truck Monkey at October 09, 2013 12:08 PM (32Ze2)
Posted by: Ian S. at October 09, 2013 12:08 PM (B/VB5)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami at October 09, 2013 12:09 PM (bCEmE)
Well I did. so now:
VACATION, BEEOTCHES!
WHOO-HOO!!!!
Posted by: ace at October 09, 2013 03:39 PM (/IWYB)
Who's going to monitor the non political threads? I feel anarchy approaching.
Posted by: polynikes at October 09, 2013 12:09 PM (m2CN7)
Posted by: troyriser at October 09, 2013 12:09 PM (O66NZ)
Posted by: © Sponge at October 09, 2013 12:09 PM (xmcEQ)
Posted by: Dr. Weevil at October 09, 2013 12:10 PM (z3eU6)
Posted by: WalrusRex at October 09, 2013 12:10 PM (Cvyue)
I feel exactly the same way. Not a good feeling to have.
Posted by: HH at October 09, 2013 12:11 PM (XXwdv)
Posted by: blindside at October 09, 2013 12:11 PM (WzWmY)
"and, kudos to Ace for doing this:
RULE 12: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.) "
I love Ace's articles, but he hasn't done any of this. When you identify someone as responsible, be it a government employee or a "journalist" to apply this Alinsky rule, the shit gets real.
This is a good piece, but it's all generalization.
Posted by: jwest at October 09, 2013 12:14 PM (u2a4R)
The problem is that if Obama succeeds in making this kind of thing permanent, Central America will not be safe for long. He's already interfered in Honduras - think he won't force them to screw over ungrateful Americans fleeing his rule?
Posted by: Dr. Weevil at October 09, 2013 12:14 PM (z3eU6)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at October 09, 2013 12:14 PM (a4Omg)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile[/i][/b][/s][/u] at October 09, 2013 12:14 PM (qyfb5)
Monkey, don't get me wrong. I'm just pointing out what all the girly men on this site say every time someone says it might be time for action.
Everyone here likes to bitch, but nobody is going to do anything of substance.
If I lived near any of these sites there is no way I would let a park police keep me out.
Posted by: Big Ben at October 09, 2013 12:15 PM (I5Htn)
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at October 09, 2013 12:15 PM (KL49F)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith's Other Mobile at October 09, 2013 04:14 PM (qyfb5)
He visited the VA yesterday. Has a serious back injury (documented by the Navy) and was told to come back in six months.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 12:17 PM (lVPtV)
I remember my son having problems at DMV when he came back too.....colorful language was involved also.
Posted by: Tami at October 09, 2013 04:09 PM (bCEmE)
Yeah, I remember. The kid had a few words for the DMV goonette. Not swear words, but he gave her a piece of his mind.
He walked in the door just swearing up a storm.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 12:19 PM (lVPtV)
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 04:07 PM (lVPtV)
Two months ago my Son was home on emergency leave from Guam.... he tried to renew his Colorado Drivers License and because he had been stationed overseas for more than a year, with his license expired... he had to take a DRIVING test to renew...
He was home for 30 days.... soonest he could test from the State? EIGHT WEEKS.
I went three levels up in management of the Colorado folks... no joy... his license is STILL expired.
Thanks for your service, now sit down and shut up...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 09, 2013 12:21 PM (lZBBB)
Posted by: blindside at October 09, 2013 12:28 PM (WzWmY)
Thanks on behalf of myself and my beneficial owner, Barrack H. Obama.
Posted by: Z as in Jersey at October 09, 2013 12:32 PM (A1UEK)
Posted by: John the Libertarian at October 09, 2013 12:34 PM (jKf/K)
Posted by: Ace for Preezy of the Yoonited Steezy at October 09, 2013 12:35 PM (2iHnw)
Terence McAuliffe, the former chairman of the national Democratic Party, was one of hundreds of people who invested in variable annuities that used terminally ill patients as the annuitants.
McAuliffe and others became owners of the investment instruments through Cranston estate planner Joseph Caramadre. Caramadre pleaded guilty to stealing the identities of terminally ill patients and using that information to falsely apply for annuities and bonds with death puts.
Prosecutors said Caramadre cost insurance companies between $37 million and $48 million from the scheme.
http://www.turnto10.com/story/23644340/insurance-companies-file-suit-against-caramadre
---
Looks like Ken Cuccinelli may be saved by the October Surprise. Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge
I hope so, but I think it's already been well established McAuliffe is a crooked businessman.
Virginia voters don't seem to care, they're still steaming over the ridiculous ultrasound abortion bill. If McAuliffe wins, you can blame most of it on that.
Posted by: McAdams at October 09, 2013 12:37 PM (WHca6)
We need Yogi bear to go fully ballistic on these NPS queebs.
Posted by: wth at October 09, 2013 12:39 PM (wAQA5)
ace, excellent post - substance is good in a degraded society and increasingly lawless, unmoored republic.
But this, and similar posts pondering the morphology and origins of media bias/dysfunction, share one flaw: they're "over-determined". Meaning everything you say is accurate and sensible, and the analysis is sound - but one really doesn't need to go to such lengths to figure it out.
Having had serious time inside the Beltway media machine, and also more time dealing with it from the guvamint side (but a hated, demonized guvamint, not a revered, pampered regime as we have today), suffice it to say that these people are not that bright, lack values that would make them (in an historical sense) Americans, and of course are happy to act as histrionic partisans for the dumbest, ugliest, most pernicious causes and figures.
And way back when I was working in their midst of all the pathologies one was most striking. There was actually a negative connotation to actual expertise - at least in national security areas. They certainly had none, and if one appeared in their number who did .... whoa. Strange looks and suspicion.
Important to note that "not (effectively) very bright" and utterly in thrall to fashionable Beltway/NPR frameworks/ignorance/"ideology" usually morph into the same thing. The (effective) stupid is so strong with these people.
Posted by: non-purist at October 09, 2013 12:40 PM (afQnV)
Essays, book, Amazon. Some assembly required, but it'll be worth it.
Posted by: Wolfus Aurelius at October 09, 2013 12:44 PM (BDU/a)
He was home for 30 days.... soonest he could test from the State? EIGHT WEEKS.
I went three levels up in management of the Colorado folks... no joy... his license is STILL expired.
Thanks for your service, now sit down and shut up...
Posted by: Romeo13 at October 09, 2013 04:21 PM (lZBBB)
Yeah, it's ridiculous. He was in a combat logistics battalion and drove every imaginable armored vehicle, without incident. Comes back to GA where idiots don't even know what a turn signal is, and goes through this shit.
Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 12:44 PM (lVPtV)
Posted by: shelby at October 09, 2013 01:38 PM (TKaeM)
Posted by: ace at October 09, 2013 01:56 PM (/IWYB)
Posted by: Jenny Hates Her Phone at October 09, 2013 02:36 PM (GmTxn)
We also need to think of some way to put the basics of your argument into slogans suitable for signs - and do it before Sunday.
I mean, I'm not dumb and I've been thinking about the issue, but I was still far less than half way to what you argued here, trying to think it out myself. You made it SO clear. Thanks for clarifying the issue.
Posted by: Dr. Weevil at October 09, 2013 02:37 PM (z3eU6)
Posted by: Adam at October 09, 2013 03:25 PM (RO/JS)
Posted by: ArrMatey at October 09, 2013 04:09 PM (uKRtA)
Posted by: sound awake at October 09, 2013 04:18 PM (wKPt0)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.275 seconds, 641 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Jane D'oh at October 09, 2013 10:33 AM (lVPtV)