March 18, 2014
— Ace Before the cute stuff, here's some news. Oklahoma is suing Obama and the EPA for what seems to be some kind of scam going on to deem federal lands off-limits to energy producers.
Here's what's going on: An environmental lobbying group sues the government, claiming that this or that energy project would endanger a protected species. The government quickly settles, agreeing to put those lands off-limits for production.
Here's what Oklahoma seems to be hinting at: It's a fix. The Administration is settling because it wants to put these lands off-limits, and lacks the Congressional authority to do so. So they concede a case they could easily win and get a piece of paper, the settlement now part of the law (a contract the US has entered into to settle a lawsuit), that says the lands are off-limits.
But this is more than just another green lawsuit. If Oklahoma and DEPA lose their suit, it could have a devastating impact on the U.S. energy boom, halting exploration and drilling on huge tracts of energy-rich land.In their suit, Oklahoma and the DEPA seek "declaratory and injunctive relief for violations of the ESA." The relief is intended to overturn designation of dozens of species added to the threatened or endangered list through the "sue and settle" process.
...
Under the Obama administration, the feds have entered into a consent agreement with the environmentalists to rush forward a judgment on an unprecedented number of species. A 2012 Chamber of Commerce study found record numbers of such "sue and settle" cases under Obama.
The issue has taken on new urgency. Under a March 31 sue-and-settle deadline, Fish and Wildlife is expected to rule that a handful of additional species are endangered — including the lesser prairie chicken.
Mickey Kaus writes that Democrats are having trouble overturning an Affirmative Action-limiting constitutional amendment in California, because Asians (largely Democratic) don't like being discriminated against based on their race.
France says it might cancel that deal to deliver two advanced helicopter-carrying assault ships to Russia. Of course, this being France, they have to be dicks about it.
"If Putin continues doing what he is doing we could envisage cancelling the sales," Fabius told TF1 television on Tuesday. "This would be part of a third level of sanctions. For the moment we are at the second level."But we will ask others, and I'm thinking namely the British, to do the same with the assets of the Russian oligarchs in London. Sanctions have to be shouldered by everyone."
Apparently there are a fair number of Russian billionaires who either live in London, or live there part time, or who have a lot of money held in London. Russian dissident and chess grandmaster Gary Kasparov has called for hitting these men financially, in hopes that they would in turn pressure Putin to behave.
Thanks to their unfettered access to Western markets, Mr. Putin and his gang have exploited Western engagement with Russia in a way that the Soviet Union's leaders never dreamed of. But this also means that they are vulnerable in a way the Soviets were not. If the West punishes Russia with sanctions and a trade war, that might be effective eventually, but it would also be cruel to the 140 million Russians who live under Mr. Putin's rule. And it would be unnecessary. Instead, sanction the 140 oligarchs who would dump Mr. Putin in the trash tomorrow if he cannot protect their assets abroad. Target their visas, their mansions and IPOs in London, their yachts and Swiss bank accounts. Use banks, not tanks.
Eh, that sounds good to me too. So maybe the French aren't off-base.
Instapundit links an article about how women cooperate with each other-- not quite as well as advertised.
“The question we wanted to examine was: Do men or women cooperate differently with members of their own sex?” Wrangham said. “The conventional wisdom is that women cooperate more easily, but when you look at how armies or sports teams function, there is evidence that men are better at cooperating in some ways.”...
“There is even evidence that these differences exist in 6-month-olds — but you can see it with the naked eye by about 5 or 6 years old, where boys form these large, loose groups, and girls tend to pair off into more intense, close friendships.”
What makes the differences particularly provocative, Benenson said, is that chimpanzees organize their relationships in nearly identical ways.
“Chimpanzee males usually have another individual they’re very close with, and they may constantly battle for dominance, but they also have a larger, loose group of allies,” Benenson said. “When it comes to defeating other groups, everybody bands together. I would argue that females don’t have that biological inclination, and they don’t have the practice.”
Apparently women cooperate well when they both have the same official rank (e.g., both are tenured professors, or both are senior research directors). When they don't share the same hierarchal rank, they're not as good at cooperation.
I imagine this is at least partly due to how boys are socialized, which is largely around team sports. There's less of an idea of an "official rank." The guy who plays the best gets, unofficially, the top rank, gets invited to be team captain, but that comes from performance.
@doreenhdixon and Neidermeyer's Bossy Horse send this: the world's largest James Bond car collection is now on sale for an asking price of... $33 million.
Dude, you could buy an Aston Martin DB5 and literally add the ejector seat, armor plating, and machine guns for $33 million. Why buy a prop when you can build out the actual car, if you want?
Oh, and if you were thinking, "Hey, I'll just FOIA the White House to get documents proving they're engaged in unilateral assertions of power for political purposes:" You lose, my friend. Because they've already thought of that, and have unilaterally rewritten the FOIA law to protect politically sensitive documents.
It's Sunshine Week, so perhaps some enterprising White House reporter will ask press secretary Jay Carney why President Obama rewrote the Freedom of Information Act without telling the rest of America.The rewrite came in an April 15, 2009, memo from then-White House Counsel Greg Craig instructing the executive branch to let White House officials review any documents sought by FOIA requestors that involved "White House equities."
That phrase is nowhere to be found in the FOIA, yet the Obama White House effectively amended the law to create a new exception to justify keeping public documents locked away from the public.
If you remember, when the White House and State were cooking their Benghazi story, the State Department insisted that any reference to prior signals about terrorism should be deleted, in order to "protect the equities" of the State Department.
Thanks to @laurww for that. That seems big. If I hadn't already done this open thread, I'd make it a main post.
Okay, and now the cute stuff. Cats and squirrels. Much cuter than maybe you were expecting.
Posted by: Ace at
03:19 PM
| Comments (215)
Post contains 1188 words, total size 8 kb.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 18, 2014 03:21 PM (YYElT)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at March 18, 2014 03:23 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at March 18, 2014 03:23 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 18, 2014 03:24 PM (YYElT)
I'm actually tempted to say "get bent" to the Asians, who voted for this shit. Let them get the democracy they came here for, good and hard.
Unfortunately repealing affirmative-action is the right thing to do anyway.
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 18, 2014 03:24 PM (30eLQ)
The deuce, you say.
Posted by: The New Black Panther Party at March 18, 2014 03:24 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Golfman in NC at March 18, 2014 03:25 PM (/djtm)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at March 18, 2014 03:25 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Adriane ... at March 18, 2014 03:27 PM (qoKTg)
Posted by: Romeo13 /facepalm at March 18, 2014 03:27 PM (84gbM)
Posted by: Hrothgar at March 18, 2014 03:28 PM (o3MSL)
Posted by: petunia at March 18, 2014 03:28 PM (DAcBA)
Posted by: blaster at March 18, 2014 03:29 PM (4+AaH)
Posted by: EC at March 18, 2014 03:29 PM (Xzx50)
Posted by: no good deed at March 18, 2014 03:29 PM (vBhbc)
As witness I call to the stand the Malays and the Javanese, who really really don't like that the local Chinese are economically eating their lunch.
The Asian stand against affirmative-action is not based on principle.
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 18, 2014 03:29 PM (30eLQ)
The FOIA law...
Isn't that a law that Dem operatives have used, repeatedly, to wage Lawfare against R's?
Like what they did to Sarah Palin, for example?
Posted by: wheatie at March 18, 2014 03:30 PM (Xs26g)
Posted by: EC at March 18, 2014 03:30 PM (Xzx50)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 18, 2014 03:30 PM (YYElT)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at March 18, 2014 03:31 PM (g4TxM)
... forsooth, affirmative action hath consequences
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 18, 2014 03:31 PM (30eLQ)
Posted by: RWC at March 18, 2014 03:32 PM (QeH9j)
(I know what I'm trying to say, but I'm saying it shitty.)
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 18, 2014 03:32 PM (celt+)
Posted by: blaster at March 18, 2014 03:33 PM (4+AaH)
Posted by: EC at March 18, 2014 03:34 PM (Xzx50)
FOIA? The God-King and his court have no need to explain their actions to the subjects.
A secret order to limit what "secret" information (which belongs to the public anyway, but that's just a silly nuance) the government will release. How Orwellian.
Posted by: Conservative Crank at March 18, 2014 03:34 PM (sQ0LB)
Posted by: Romeo13 /facepalm at March 18, 2014 03:34 PM (84gbM)
Posted by: --- at March 18, 2014 03:34 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: willow at March 18, 2014 03:36 PM (nqBYe)
Sue and settle with the stroke of a pen and that's the fucking law. I love government and it's persuasive ways.
Posted by: Paul Begala at March 18, 2014 03:36 PM (nQjHM)
Posted by: ace at March 18, 2014 03:36 PM (/FnUH)
Posted by: EC at March 18, 2014 03:37 PM (Xzx50)
Posted by: Liechtenstein at March 18, 2014 03:38 PM (hn5v5)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 18, 2014 03:38 PM (t3UFN)
Posted by: The French at March 18, 2014 03:38 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 18, 2014 03:38 PM (rDidD)
Posted by: Regular Guy at March 18, 2014 03:38 PM (N3Al8)
Banana republic stuff, with the banana being lodged firmly up our collective poop chutes.
Posted by: GnuBreed at March 18, 2014 03:39 PM (wNF3N)
Posted by: shredded chi at March 18, 2014 03:39 PM (Z+1b9)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 18, 2014 03:39 PM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Conservative Crank at March 18, 2014 03:39 PM (sQ0LB)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 18, 2014 03:39 PM (rDidD)
Posted by: willow at March 18, 2014 03:40 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: King Barry the Just at March 18, 2014 03:40 PM (aTXUx)
Posted by: ace at March 18, 2014 03:41 PM (/FnUH)
Posted by: NSA Listening Post #1477 at March 18, 2014 03:41 PM (Xzx50)
Posted by: ontherocks at March 18, 2014 03:41 PM (XPHw/)
Posted by: ace at March 18, 2014 03:42 PM (/FnUH)
Posted by: kbdabear at March 18, 2014 03:42 PM (aTXUx)
Posted by: NSA Listening Post #1477 at March 18, 2014 03:42 PM (Xzx50)
Posted by: willow at March 18, 2014 03:42 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: blaster at March 18, 2014 03:43 PM (4+AaH)
Posted by: Romeo13 /facepalm at March 18, 2014 03:43 PM (84gbM)
Posted by: Lauren at March 18, 2014 03:44 PM (hFL/3)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 18, 2014 03:44 PM (rDidD)
Posted by: Regular Guy at March 18, 2014 03:45 PM (N3Al8)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 18, 2014 03:45 PM (t3UFN)
How come these enviro-nazis have standing to sue the govt over shit like this, but it's so hard to find standing to sue over the numerous unlawful actions that the SCOAMF is taking?
Posted by: Syrias question, you guys at March 18, 2014 03:45 PM (YWNu7)
"Citizens suits" (i.e., legalized extortion) are expressly permitted by several environmental statutes including the Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act, etc. Because the EPA is just too busy to enforce the law on its own.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at March 18, 2014 03:47 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Adriane ... at March 18, 2014 03:48 PM (qoKTg)
Posted by: blaster at March 18, 2014 03:48 PM (4+AaH)
Posted by: RWC at March 18, 2014 03:48 PM (QeH9j)
Posted by: mrp at March 18, 2014 03:49 PM (JBggj)
Jon Snow shows up and he's the best swordsman there - because he's the bastard of House Stark, not the bastard of some useless hobo. It is then made clear to Jon (I have to call him "Jon", half the people there have the last name "Snow") that he is part of a team, and that he should help the others find what they're best at.
Especially when Samwell shows up, who's "come to take the black... pudding".
The Wall works as a team.
.
.
.
.
.
.
SPOILER! - yeah, they have to be bailed out at the end of book 3 / somewhere in season 4 - but that's because of low numbers, not because of the phenomenal leadership and courage to be found at Castle Black.
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 18, 2014 03:49 PM (30eLQ)
School bans boy from wearing a My Little Pony backpack because its a trigger for bullying.
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20797857,00.html
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 18, 2014 03:49 PM (YYElT)
They took the Choom Kings shilling.
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at March 18, 2014 03:49 PM (DL2i+)
Plus I wonder if lesser prairie chicken tastes like, well, chicken.
Posted by: GnuBreed at March 18, 2014 03:49 PM (wNF3N)
Posted by: --- at March 18, 2014 03:50 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: shredded chi at March 18, 2014 03:50 PM (Z+1b9)
Posted by: California Democrats at March 18, 2014 03:51 PM (AymDN)
Posted by: Mary Cloggenstein from Brattleboro, Vermont at March 18, 2014 03:51 PM (jWvfJ)
Posted by: Costanza Defense at March 18, 2014 03:51 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Conservative Crank at March 18, 2014 03:51 PM (sQ0LB)
My friend's wife said to our table, "Geez, what kind of a way is that to talk to a friend? Guys are terrible."
I explained, "That's dude talk. He's saying 'You asshole, you suck', but if there were subtitles under him, they would say, CONGRATULATIONS, MY FRIEND, ON YOUR GOOD FORTUNE. Now, if those were two women, the friend would say, 'Oh, wow, that's awesome! You're so lucky.'... BITCH."
My friend's wife laughed and said, "Yep, you're absolutely right."
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 18, 2014 03:52 PM (celt+)
Posted by: Adriane ... at March 18, 2014 03:52 PM (qoKTg)
Posted by: Lauren at March 18, 2014 03:52 PM (hFL/3)
Posted by: Costanza Defense at March 18, 2014 03:52 PM (ZPrif)
Whew hew got drunk for St. Patty's and a sing-a-long ensued. Does anyone remember that old family favorite. Kiss Me Harry Arse in the Springtime?Lord we sang it to all.
Posted by: Harry Arse at March 18, 2014 03:52 PM (N3Al8)
Posted by: Insomniac at March 18, 2014 03:52 PM (UAMVq)
Posted by: LizLem at March 18, 2014 03:52 PM (g2JDn)
MFM: Not on your life
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 18, 2014 03:53 PM (FE/sZ)
The Republican National Committee is out with a new series of web ads that star people of a variety of different demographics designed to appeal to different segments of the American population that theyÂ’ve recently struggled to win: minorities, women, and, yes, hipsters.
The ad campaign, entitled “Create Your American Dream,” features a spotlight on Scott Greenberg, a bespactacled young man that National Journal’s Lucia Graves accuses of that deadly word that doesn’t really mean anything: “hipster.”
http://tinyurl.com/ovble5z
Yes -- the GOP's great new strategy is sending out their own Footie PJ Boy.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 18, 2014 03:53 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 18, 2014 03:53 PM (YYElT)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 18, 2014 03:53 PM (rDidD)
Posted by: RWC at March 18, 2014 03:54 PM (QeH9j)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 18, 2014 07:44 PM (t3UFN)
They want to turn the whole country into the way Barry throws a baseball
Posted by: TheQuietMan at March 18, 2014 03:54 PM (FE/sZ)
Posted by: kbdabear at March 18, 2014 03:55 PM (aTXUx)
Posted by: EC at March 18, 2014 03:55 PM (Xzx50)
Posted by: willow at March 18, 2014 03:55 PM (nqBYe)
ya, well,
We are a law abiding society, so we'll just have to wait until the next election, and elect someone else. It's the prudent thing to do. It's how our system of government works.
We have nothing to fear.
Everything is going to be fine.
Posted by: Wilsum Flicket at March 18, 2014 03:56 PM (jBD8U)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 18, 2014 07:53 PM (YYElT)
I prefer to think that a funnel-web spider will crawl up inside her dessicated lady-bits and nest there, where its offspring will eat their way out.
Posted by: Conservative Crank at March 18, 2014 03:57 PM (sQ0LB)
Shocker that this WH and EPA act like organized crime to thieve from Americans.
I am surprised they haven't but cows and pigs on the endangered list. Because meat is murder. Tasty delicious murder.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at March 18, 2014 03:57 PM (0Kobm)
Posted by: rickl at March 18, 2014 03:57 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 18, 2014 03:57 PM (rDidD)
Posted by: Romeo13... whose face hurts from too much facepalming at March 18, 2014 03:57 PM (84gbM)
Posted by: EC at March 18, 2014 03:57 PM (Xzx50)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 18, 2014 03:57 PM (qyfb5)
Not labor groups, exploring, or hunting? In my state, young boys are forbidden team sports until seventh grade. It was the child molesters. They got found out.
Posted by: Stringer Davis at March 18, 2014 03:57 PM (xq1UY)
Posted by: Marcotte's Not Husband at March 18, 2014 03:57 PM (hFL/3)
Posted by: kbdabear at March 18, 2014 03:57 PM (aTXUx)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 18, 2014 03:57 PM (DmNpO)
Posted by: The Nepotistic Hat at March 18, 2014 03:58 PM (AymDN)
Yup, it's why I can not see a friend for several months and then pick up a conversation with them like nothings changed. My sisters don't understand how I do it, it drives them crazy.
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at March 18, 2014 03:58 PM (WdbF7)
Posted by: Detroit School Vouchers at March 18, 2014 03:59 PM (Oa0CG)
Posted by: Colorado Alex at March 18, 2014 03:59 PM (lr3d7)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 18, 2014 03:59 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Romeo13... whose face hurts from too much facepalming at March 18, 2014 03:59 PM (84gbM)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 18, 2014 03:59 PM (30eLQ)
Posted by: RWC at March 18, 2014 04:00 PM (QeH9j)
Posted by: Lauren at March 18, 2014 04:00 PM (hFL/3)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 18, 2014 04:00 PM (YYElT)
Posted by: kbdabear at March 18, 2014 04:00 PM (aTXUx)
Posted by: mr_jack at March 18, 2014 04:01 PM (TMG3G)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 18, 2014 04:01 PM (rDidD)
Posted by: willow at March 18, 2014 04:01 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: EC at March 18, 2014 04:01 PM (Xzx50)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 18, 2014 04:02 PM (qyfb5)
I KEEL YOU, ACE!!!
Posted by: [i]DOCTOR[/i] Amy Bishop!!! at March 18, 2014 04:02 PM (hn5v5)
Posted by: EC at March 18, 2014 04:02 PM (Xzx50)
Posted by: LizLem at March 18, 2014 04:03 PM (g2JDn)
Posted by: Buzzion at March 18, 2014 04:03 PM (U7HuX)
They are pervasive and speeding up.
.....the UN, just another name for........yeah, you catch on quick.....
Posted by: ontherocks at March 18, 2014 07:41 PM (XPHw/)
---------------------------------------------
Perhaps a coinkidink, but OK passed a law last week making Agenda 21 in OK illegal. This might be the extension of that law. Someone needs to start cleaning up the EPA/Agenda 21 mess.
Posted by: Soona at March 18, 2014 04:03 PM (sx5Tc)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 18, 2014 04:04 PM (rDidD)
Posted by: garrett at March 18, 2014 04:04 PM (WqkMb)
Posted by: Lauren at March 18, 2014 04:04 PM (hFL/3)
Read it. I couldn't figure out JPod's point. Is it good that there are shows about evil and/or downscale whites now? Bad? Bigoted?
I already know that whites exist who suck. Many would say I'm one of them.
I just didn't get it. Maybe someone with better writing abilities than JPod has can explain it to me.
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 18, 2014 04:04 PM (30eLQ)
Posted by: garrett at March 18, 2014 04:05 PM (WqkMb)
This ones even got the scratching from Sir Mix-a-Lot
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at March 18, 2014 04:05 PM (DL2i+)
Posted by: The Trapless Hat at March 18, 2014 04:06 PM (AymDN)
Posted by: EC at March 18, 2014 04:06 PM (Xzx50)
Posted by: NCKate at March 18, 2014 04:07 PM (y7PFk)
Posted by: willow at March 18, 2014 04:07 PM (nqBYe)
So... Andaman Islanders ordered them some Chinese / Malaysian fusion takeout?
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 18, 2014 04:07 PM (30eLQ)
Posted by: willow at March 18, 2014 04:08 PM (nqBYe)
I am now thinking plane and hostages are in Indonesia, where Baroque first heard the melodic message of the call to prayer. But! I have always felt Iran was involved due to false passports held by good mooslems from Iran. So there's that...and, at least, Israel is on alert. Meanwhile, Barry's hair is turning grey but we have not heard what the Grand Poohba thinks of this entire mystery. Heck, as much time passed it could be in Bumfuzzle, Alabama by now. Apparently, and thank goodness I don't go ovah there, India only uses their radar now and then or when the moon passes near Venus. Thailand only lets you know about their radar when you ask for it, and it saw something but did not send up military jets as fossil fuels... or there is a lot of "help" in that area for this rogue plot. Burma does not know if they even have radar, so don't ask them! And hippies or fisherman said they saw either a low flying plane or a flying dragon in Maldives on morning of missing plane.
So, either they are all dead and at the bottom of sea (and, of course, no one explained the large debris nor the huge oil slicks, cause!)...or this is a hostage situation. Or they are all dead but there is a plane outfitted with nukes...no biggie! Or the security world knows, have always known, and are protecting our delicate sensibilities. Perhaps one of the countries panicked, and I don't blame them as their radar must be like the large satellite dishes of yore for tv's, and fired a surface to air missile at this plane and poof. Yet they do not want to cause an international incident from their mistake, as, heaven knows, there is nothing to worry about with an entire missing plane. Meanwhile, I imagine the Texas engineers who specialized in "invisible shields" for the military either helped paint the jet prior to take-off, working with the pilot who had it all worked out on his simulator, and they are sitting pretty somewhere with Iran footing the bill after this test run.
I don't give a hoot-n-hell about the radar: with all of the satellites from all countries up in space, what is the deal? You can read my license plate but don't see a big fireball blazing to sea? Or cannot look back at the time and see where the "triple seven"::drink:: landed? I call barnyard manure (as my granny used to say instead of the 's' word).
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Bossy Redneck Queen at March 18, 2014 04:08 PM (baL2B)
Posted by: AmishDude at March 18, 2014 04:09 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: willow at March 18, 2014 04:10 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: mr_jack at March 18, 2014 08:01 PM (TMG3G)"
--------------------
From what I understand, they were making the fire control group cavity out of a different substance than the remainder of the receiver. Meaning that depending on how they manufacture it, they may be making a "firearm" and then filling it in with a material for the customer to remove (kind of like that old "Chip-Away" toy with the statue inside the lump of clay that you chip out). Which is a no-no (once you've made it in a way that's it's a "firearm", there's no undoing it legally.)
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at March 18, 2014 04:11 PM (celt+)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 18, 2014 04:11 PM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 18, 2014 04:11 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: GMB (et al) at March 18, 2014 04:12 PM (nkPV9)
Posted by: votermom at March 18, 2014 04:12 PM (GSIDW)
Posted by: AmishDude at March 18, 2014 04:12 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Insomniac at March 18, 2014 04:12 PM (UAMVq)
The best thing about his speculation is that if he's right, it would really cut down the search area. Seems worth a try.
Posted by: Splunge at March 18, 2014 04:13 PM (qyomX)
Posted by: willow at March 18, 2014 04:13 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: LizLem at March 18, 2014 04:13 PM (g2JDn)
A major air terror (22 down; 5 letters)
I
S
L
A
M
Posted by: The Times of London at March 18, 2014 04:13 PM (hn5v5)
Posted by: yankeefifth at March 18, 2014 04:14 PM (rDidD)
Posted by: kbdabear at March 18, 2014 04:15 PM (aTXUx)
If, at this point, I turned to my friend and said, "DUDE, you're my FRIEND! You're supposed to SUPPORT me!," I would be laughed out of the gym.
IN many ways, this is the story of Barry Soterro
Posted by: BunkerinTheBurbs at March 18, 2014 04:15 PM (X3xYu)
Posted by: willow at March 18, 2014 04:15 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 18, 2014 04:15 PM (qyfb5)
Do hetereosexuals really wear suspenders like that these days?
Posted by: Splunge at March 18, 2014 04:16 PM (qyomX)
Posted by: AmishDude at March 18, 2014 04:16 PM (T0NGe)
Posted by: Aviator at March 18, 2014 04:17 PM (3rrMW)
Posted by: Insomniac at March 18, 2014 04:17 PM (UAMVq)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 18, 2014 04:17 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Nip Sip at March 18, 2014 04:17 PM (0FSuD)
Posted by: willow at March 18, 2014 04:18 PM (nqBYe)
Consider it from a hunter gatherer society. The men are out hunting. There's probably some friendly competition and efforts to "beat" others but the best hunter will be recognized as the leader and best because that will be better for all and competition will keep him from getting lazy.
Despite what Heinlein may have said, specialization also benefits humans. The mediocre hunter may be better at constructing shelter, producing spears/arrows, or any other number of tasks. Likewise, the fat kid picked last for gym is the one everyone wants as a lab partner. As a result leadership may shift as the situation changes. When there's a mastodon to kill, or an enemy war-party approaching, everyone turns to the best warrior. When it comes time to settle a dispute, you go to the elder instead. Every boy figures this out early on and realized what he's good at and what he's not.
Posted by: Colorado Alex at March 18, 2014 04:18 PM (lr3d7)
Posted by: kbdabear at March 18, 2014 04:18 PM (aTXUx)
Beijin to Kuala Lumpur, "No more Chinese take out for you! You finished!"
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 18, 2014 04:19 PM (YYElT)
Posted by: Dick Quest at March 18, 2014 04:19 PM (Aif/5)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at March 18, 2014 04:19 PM (dfYL9)
Posted by: Miss Piggy at March 18, 2014 04:21 PM (UAMVq)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 18, 2014 04:21 PM (qyfb5)
It's a supernatural thriller, sorta Stephen Kingish, but given an A movie treatment as opposed to King's stuff usually done no better than B grade.
The movie got me to suspend my disbelief; I was sucked in right from the start.
Oh, and not one single bare boob in sight. However, there is a mighty fine cameltoe if you pay attention.
Two thumbs up.
Posted by: GnuBreed at March 18, 2014 04:21 PM (wNF3N)
Posted by: Nip Sip at March 18, 2014 04:22 PM (0FSuD)
http://tinyurl.com/p92wnej
Posted by: kbdabear at March 18, 2014 07:55 PM (aTXUx)
Sounds very plausible to me. I usually go by the motto: keep it simple, keep it stupid. The simplest expannation is usually the best
Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 18, 2014 08:11 PM (t3UFN)
That makes sense. Thanks. It would (maybe) also explain the fuel/oil slick or something seen initially but never explained: maybe he dumped fuel? Yet Malaysia was very quick to discount both the large three pieces of debris and the oil slick on day three or so. All I read was it was "nothing." Yet we saw photos of "nothing."
The way the government of Malaysia has handled this is bizarre. You'd think some big guys, like China, Japan or, uh, the former powerful USA would be demanding results.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Bossy Redneck Queen at March 18, 2014 04:22 PM (baL2B)
Posted by: willow at March 18, 2014 04:24 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: willow at March 18, 2014 04:24 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Nip Sip at March 18, 2014 04:25 PM (0FSuD)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 18, 2014 04:26 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: tangonine at March 18, 2014 04:26 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 18, 2014 04:27 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: mr_jack at March 18, 2014 04:29 PM (TMG3G)
Posted by: willow at March 18, 2014 04:29 PM (nqBYe)
IIRC each engine on a 777 has a generator. Then there are the batteries. And the pilots can lower the RAT and let the slipstream spin it and generate electricity. So if all three go *poof* at the same time its pretty catastrophic and well you will be looking for glitter wreckage.
But all I am doing is speculating. Until we find the plane, the simplest answer is still - We Don't Know.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 18, 2014 04:29 PM (YYElT)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at March 18, 2014 04:30 PM (dfYL9)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at March 18, 2014 04:31 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 18, 2014 04:31 PM (YYElT)
Posted by: kbdabear at March 18, 2014 04:38 PM (aTXUx)
Posted by: kbdabear at March 18, 2014 04:41 PM (aTXUx)
http://tinyurl.com/pwyp66t
So...it landed?
I am relieved it was not star wars explody up at 45,000 feet and resulted in tiny pieces and radioactive particles. So, there's that!
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Bossy Redneck Queen at March 18, 2014 04:41 PM (baL2B)
Posted by: tangonine at March 18, 2014 04:52 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Orlandocon ette at March 18, 2014 05:05 PM (SldZ2)
Posted by: stace at March 18, 2014 05:28 PM (9PXzx)
Posted by: anon a mouse at March 18, 2014 05:33 PM (gXRIG)
Posted by: Erowmero at March 18, 2014 05:34 PM (1gcFZ)
Posted by: mr_jack at March 18, 2014 05:50 PM (TMG3G)
Posted by: AltonJackson at March 18, 2014 05:58 PM (JMmQ9)
When they want to propose a rule, they have to go through the publication process, receive public comment, hold hearings, there is time to mount opposition (even from within the Administration, especially when Republican) and block it.
BUT if they get one of their greenie groups to sue, they can just settle and get a consent decree "ordering" them to do the same thing with no public input.
Posted by: Adjoran at March 18, 2014 09:06 PM (QIQ6j)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3367 seconds, 343 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Natasha at March 18, 2014 03:21 PM (8ZskC)