February 27, 2014
— Ace Great piece from @rdbrewer4 in the sidebar.
Hannan's goal is not prove that the left harbors secret Nazi sympathies. His point is rather more nuanced:
To be absolutely clear, I don’t believe that modern Leftists have subliminal Nazi leanings, or that their loathing of Hitler is in any way feigned. That’s not my argument. What I want to do, by holding up the mirror, is to take on the equally false idea that there is an ideological continuum between free-marketers and fascists.The idea that Nazism is a more extreme form of conservatism has insinuated its way into popular culture. You hear it, not only when spotty students yell “fascist” at Tories, but when pundits talk of revolutionary anti-capitalist parties, such as the BNP and Golden Dawn, as “far Right”.
What is it based on, this connection? Little beyond a jejune sense that Left-wing means compassionate and Right-wing means nasty and fascists are nasty. When written down like that, the notion sounds idiotic, but think of the groups around the world that the BBC, for example, calls “Right-wing”: the Taliban, who want communal ownership of goods; the Iranian revolutionaries, who abolished the monarchy, seized industries and destroyed the middle class; Vladimir Zhirinovsky, who pined for Stalinism. The “Nazis-were-far-Right” shtick is a symptom of the wider notion that “Right-wing” is a synonym for “baddie”.
One of my constituents once complained to the Beeb about a report on the repression of Mexico's indigenous peoples, in which the government was labelled Right-wing. The governing party, he pointed out, was a member of the Socialist International and, again, the give-away was in its name: Institutional Revolutionary Party. The BBC’s response was priceless. Yes, it accepted that the party was socialist, “but what our correspondent was trying to get across was that it is authoritarian”.
In fact, authoritarianism was the common feature of socialists of both National and Leninist varieties, who rushed to stick each other in prison camps or before firing squads. Each faction loathed the other as heretical, but both scorned free-market individualists as beyond redemption. Their battle was all the fiercer, as Hayek pointed out in 1944, because it was a battle between brothers.
It's very difficult to capture any country's politics in the short-hand you use for your own. For example, do you know who the "bad guys" were to the French Revolutionaries?
Well, the monarchy, of course, and the aristocrats, obviously, and the priests, eventually. But there was a fourth villain despised by those of the French Revolution:
Liberals.
Yes, liberals. Because economic liberals had convinced Louis Capet to reduce the mandates and restrictions on trade in grains (that is, they convinced him to let the farmers sell to foreign buyers at the best price they could find).
This proved unpopular, because, as bad luck would have it, France was hit with a few cold seasons of crop failures just before the French Revolution, and Parisians got very angry about paying more for bread under the new liberalized selling regime. The French farmers were selling French grain to the British, you see, and French bread went up in cost, as the new cost was set not by Louis Capet's ministers but the free market. (And the price of bread was a major factor in sparking the Revolution, but there were a set of about four major factors.)
Treason!
The concept of liberalizing economics and freedom became discredited, and liberals were among the enemies of the Revolution.
When the Revolution went into its decapitation frenzy, those damned farmers and bakers refusing to sell their wares for below cost were explicitly charged with economic treason (hoarding), and beheaded.*
Now, it is common for people to immediately analogize all parties in a foreign country with their "analogues" -- not really their analogues, thus the scare-quotes -- from the country they know, their own.
Everyone does this. At first. But as your read more and understand more, you realize that another nation's politics cannot be reduced the easy-peasy lemon-squeezey third grade level template you began with.
But reporters keep on doing it, don't they? And they claim to be "experts" in the subject matters they report on.
The media does this because they are imbeciles. They ought to know better than to pretend that the politics of any country tracks with the American (or British) models.
In fact, they were probably told a dozen times that they shouldn't do this, as it's false.
But they do it anyway. Because they're shamefully partisan and not-terribly-secretly propagandists for leftism.
They refuse to label any bad-acting regime as "socialist" or "communist," even when they are clearly that (and even when it says that right on the tin), and instead insist on referring to all Baddies as Right-Wing.
When anarchists destroy property in the US, they are referred to as "anarchists" and "anti-globalists" -- never "the far left."
When Occupy Wall Street gets a little stinky and embarrassing, they are "anti-capitalists." Never the "far left," and certainly not "extreme liberals."
But all violent regimes are called rightwing, even the ones that are expressly leftwing.
As Hannan explains, they just say that the nice good leftwing government because shamefully Rightwing when it crushed the opposition and murdered dissidents. (Even when they're crushing opposition and murdering dissidents in the service of redistributing wealth!)
Because you know -- leftwing governments hardly ever do that, except for always. Only rightwing people do that, so if it happens, you know what you're dealing with is a rightwing government.
Real the whole piece. The beginning bit, which I didn't excerpt, constitutes his proof that the Nazis were indeed socialist.
* In the interests of accuracy, I should note that the beginning of the French Revolution contained liberals on the revolutionary side. And it also contained a lot of priests on the revolutionary side, too. It contained aristocrats. Hell, it even contained a member of Louis Capet's royal family, his cousin, the Duke of Orleans (Philippe "Egalité," he would style himself, calling himself an equal, not a lord-- but he did keep his property).
In fact, it contained a lot of monarchists on the revolutionary side -- people like Lafayette (IIRC) supported a constitutional monarchy, like Britain's, not an all-powerful sovereign.
But as the grim, bloody logic of the Revolution continued (as almost all revolutionary regimes do), each of these once-allies were deemed enemies, and either forced to flee or brought to Place de la Revolution to have their heads deducted from their bodies' heights.
Posted by: Ace at
10:32 AM
| Comments (298)
Post contains 1098 words, total size 7 kb.
Posted by: Infidel at February 27, 2014 10:35 AM (cojT9)
Posted by: tasker at February 27, 2014 10:35 AM (RJMhd)
Am I reading that correctly?
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at February 27, 2014 10:35 AM (DPkKe)
Posted by: DangerGirl and her Sanity Prod (tm) at February 27, 2014 02:34 PM (4cA6A)
Nor is it true sweater puppies!
Posted by: EC at February 27, 2014 10:36 AM (GQ8sn)
And I heard a voice in the midst of the four beasts say, A measure of wheat for a penny, and three measures of barley for a penny; and see thou hurt not the oil and the wine.
Command economy writ large.
Posted by: Azenogoth (Freedom or Fire) Est. 1836 at February 27, 2014 10:38 AM (LJpVo)
"It's very difficult to capture any country's politics in the short-hand you use for your own. For example, do you know who the "bad guys" were to the French Revolutionaries?"
Yeah, the French.
Posted by: maddogg at February 27, 2014 10:39 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Juan McCain at February 27, 2014 10:39 AM (Kkt/i)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 10:39 AM (xZxMD)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 10:39 AM (tyz5J)
So what we find is Nazis were right wing despite the fact that they even had "Socialist" in their name. And they were "liberal" despite the fact that they were anything like the original liberals.
They apply the same thing to the term that most people here use and I despise; and that is "crony capitalism". That applies to a politician (but only on the right) who steers money and buisness to companies owned by their friends and contributors. This crap is pure corruption and has nothing to do with capitalism. Which is why when you hear me refer to it, it is "crony corruption" despite which aisle you sit in.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 27, 2014 10:39 AM (T2V/1)
...and I forthwith ban you from my internets.
I bid you Adieu.
Posted by: Chubbles Jhosnon at February 27, 2014 10:39 AM (J6JcG)
Posted by: phreshone at February 27, 2014 10:40 AM (Q6pxP)
Posted by: M. Murcek at February 27, 2014 10:40 AM (GJUgF)
This is going one of two ways:
Individual freedom vs. total government despotism.
An old Chinese proverb used to say: "The Emperor is far away..."
Now the Emperor is reviewing your fucking IPhone messages. Scary times indeed. The left continues to attack everything that is individual freedom. Look at the fights we are having now.
Posted by: prescient11 at February 27, 2014 10:40 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 27, 2014 10:41 AM (6bMel)
Posted by: Heralder at February 27, 2014 10:41 AM (/Mxso)
Posted by: maddogg at February 27, 2014 10:42 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: DangerGirl and her Sanity Prod (tm) at February 27, 2014 10:42 AM (4cA6A)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 27, 2014 10:42 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 10:42 AM (tyz5J)
They screw us, and we help.
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at February 27, 2014 10:42 AM (BZAd3)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 02:42 PM (tyz5J)
Only degrees of "success."
Posted by: Juan McCain at February 27, 2014 10:43 AM (Kkt/i)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at February 27, 2014 10:43 AM (g4TxM)
Posted by: The OccuPooper Dictionary at February 27, 2014 10:43 AM (BAS5M)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 27, 2014 10:44 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Emily at February 27, 2014 10:44 AM (7Rn+/)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 27, 2014 10:44 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: SE Pa Moron [/i] at February 27, 2014 10:44 AM (CnA98)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 27, 2014 02:42 PM (CJjw5)
What? You didn't appreciate the many interesting fence posts , empty beaches, and bicycle spoke shots. You didn't purchase a calender?
Posted by: maddogg at February 27, 2014 10:44 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: tasker at February 27, 2014 10:44 AM (RJMhd)
Posted by: steevy at February 27, 2014 10:44 AM (zqvg6)
Posted by: Dr Spank at February 27, 2014 10:44 AM (hn70M)
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at February 27, 2014 10:45 AM (IN7k+)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 10:45 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Ricardo Kill at February 27, 2014 10:45 AM (gOoFi)
Posted by: George Orwell at February 27, 2014 10:46 AM (DErq5)
Posted by: tasker at February 27, 2014 02:44 PM (RJMhd)
And, as everyone knows, history never repeats.
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at February 27, 2014 10:46 AM (BZAd3)
Posted by: Wayne Storm at February 27, 2014 10:46 AM (DAevm)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 27, 2014 10:47 AM (dfYL9)
Did the regime wind up with millions dead? If so then socialist.
Nazis Y
Stalinist Y
Pol Pot Y
Mao Y
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 10:47 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 27, 2014 10:47 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 27, 2014 10:47 AM (6bMel)
Posted by: BurtTC at February 27, 2014 10:47 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: jwest at February 27, 2014 10:48 AM (u2a4R)
"I am good, and I consider myself on the Left; therefore the Left must always be good."
And there is the nuance of sub-sophmoric thinking.
To acknowledge that people can be on your political side of an issue and yet still be bad people is the subtle type of thinking that is developed in, say, the ninth grade. To acknowledge that every political issue may involve tradeoffs and not be just "good vs. bad" is the kind of mental nimbleness associated with high school juniors.
Unfortunately, it is hard to get this through the minds of those who start off with the position in the first sentence of this comment. and by hard I mean impossible.
Posted by: Mikey NTH -Clean Up You Caucus! Rumor Soap with Lathering Phosphates at the Outrage Outlet! at February 27, 2014 10:48 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: Guillotined Robespierre Zombie at February 27, 2014 10:49 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: RWC at February 27, 2014 10:49 AM (MtC8f)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 10:49 AM (tyz5J)
Posted by: Bill Ayers at February 27, 2014 10:49 AM (Q6pxP)
@36 The most amusing arguments against the Nazis being socialists are that the Nazis were authoritarian, militaristic, and nationalistic. As if those terms could never be applied to socialists. Mao, Stalin, Castro, Pol Pot, the Kim dynasty. No,no no; they are different somehow.
-----------------------
When I was in high school, I had a substitute teacher try to convince the class that the Soviets were just like us because they had a president.
He, of course, neglected to mention that the General Secretary of the Communist Party is where the true power lay in the USSR.
The militarism of Communist nations gets dismissed because "they have to defend themselves against those imperialist colonial powers in the West." And the nationalism, which usually takes the form of some variant of blatant racism, is almost always ignored.
Posted by: junior at February 27, 2014 10:49 AM (UWFpX)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 27, 2014 10:49 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: DangerGirl and her Sanity Prod (tm) at February 27, 2014 10:49 AM (4cA6A)
Posted by: Robert Reich at February 27, 2014 10:50 AM (A0sHn)
Posted by: DangerGirl and her Sanity Prod (tm) at February 27, 2014 10:50 AM (4cA6A)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 10:50 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: ace at February 27, 2014 10:50 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: tasker at February 27, 2014 10:51 AM (RJMhd)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff, at February 27, 2014 10:51 AM (CJjw5)
When two businesses collude on their own (without govt) to, say, fix prices, you could call it "crony capitalism."
I disagree. If businesses engage in price fixing without the assistance of the government, it is a problem, but it becomes a problem on a whole new level when the government helps or protects them. "Crony Capitalism" describes a situation where a governmental actor is involved.
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at February 27, 2014 10:51 AM (IN7k+)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at February 27, 2014 10:51 AM (32Ze2)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 27, 2014 10:52 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: garrett at February 27, 2014 10:52 AM (G2iZT)
Posted by: X at February 27, 2014 10:52 AM (KHo8t)
Posted by: RS at February 27, 2014 10:52 AM (YAGV/)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at February 27, 2014 10:52 AM (g4TxM)
Posted by: steevy at February 27, 2014 10:53 AM (zqvg6)
When I was at university, I graphically displayed political positions on a graph, with individual autonomy on the X axis and popular support on the Y axis. The resulting image was nearly a circle. The extreme right (junta) and the extreme left (communism) were nearly touching.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 27, 2014 10:53 AM (ZkzmI)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 02:50 PM (olDqf)
That's an excellent way of seeing the political world.
I will now be calling it my own.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at February 27, 2014 10:53 AM (QFxY5)
Posted by: Ribald Conservative riding Orca at February 27, 2014 10:53 AM (RFeQD)
Posted by: DangerGirl and her Sanity Prod (tm) at February 27, 2014 10:53 AM (4cA6A)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 27, 2014 10:53 AM (dfYL9)
Posted by: sven10077 at February 27, 2014 10:53 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 10:54 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at February 27, 2014 10:54 AM (WaedO)
Put more simply; under socialism the government takes your money in some form of taxes and redistributes it as needed for all. In communism the government owns everything and gives you a little of it back to live on.
Common to both systems the government apparatchiks and Party leaders get the skim of the creme off the top before giving it back in small pieces.
Under the other relative of communism/socialism the government owns nothing but regulates the hell out of every thing telling you how you can operate your business. That is fascism.
We started going Fascist first regulating a lot of shit in a benign way. The in the progressive era we started going socialist. Under FDR a huge portion of the econmoy had become socialist. LBJ completed that conversion. By the end of the LBJ/Clinton era we are almost 100% socialist.
Obama is completing the conversion now so we move out of the intermittent area and into the communist government.
And one thing to keep in mind, it takes an all powerful government to implement socialism with a mixture of fascism. It takes a complete dictator to implement communism. There has never been a government that was communist that was not run by a dictator.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 27, 2014 10:54 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: DangerGirl and her Sanity Prod (tm) at February 27, 2014 10:55 AM (4cA6A)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 10:55 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: Joe Biden at February 27, 2014 10:55 AM (S+el1)
Posted by: Mikey NTH -Clean Up You Caucus! Rumor Soap with Lathering Phosphates at the Outrage Outlet! at February 27, 2014 10:55 AM (hLRSq)
Please, extortion is such an ugly word. I prefer coersion or community organizing.
Posted by: Barack Mussolini at February 27, 2014 10:55 AM (Q6pxP)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 10:55 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invisible Pimp Hand at February 27, 2014 10:56 AM (WdbF7)
Posted by: sven10077 at February 27, 2014 10:56 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: Buckeye Abroad at February 27, 2014 10:56 AM (QpIfk)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 10:56 AM (tyz5J)
Posted by: Wayne Storm at February 27, 2014 10:56 AM (DAevm)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 10:56 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: Judge Pug at February 27, 2014 10:56 AM (6Nj7A)
And what good lefty is going to argue with the wisdom of Stalin.
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at February 27, 2014 10:57 AM (IN7k+)
Posted by: rickl at February 27, 2014 10:57 AM (zoehZ)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff, Rachel Corrie Martyr Brigades at February 27, 2014 10:57 AM (CJjw5)
80 -
Ummm, no. I'm not talking about the 1790s. Ace is talking about the 1790s.
The french had a legislature, during the Third Republic (the 1920s-30s, check the exact dates, I don't have it in front of me). In that legislature, there were nazis. And commies.
That was the seating arrangement. Nazis on the right, commies on the left. That's where the designation came from.
Posted by: BurtTC at February 27, 2014 10:57 AM (TOk1P)
Of course, nothing like this could or will ever happen in America.
Instead, the economically treasonous who refuse to comply with government _diktat_ in the marketplace will simply have their property and businesses expropriated, and their persons punitively imprisoned.
Far more humane and progressive than decapitation, I'm sure we can all agree. So glad to have left those erroneous Old World ways behind us.
Posted by: torquewrench at February 27, 2014 10:58 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Barry Soetoro at February 27, 2014 10:58 AM (Q6pxP)
Posted by: Judge Pug at February 27, 2014 10:58 AM (6Nj7A)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 10:58 AM (olDqf)
When two businesses collude on their own (without govt) to, say, fix prices, you could call it "crony capitalism."
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 27, 2014 02:47 PM (dfYL9)
I call it a felony. That also has nothing to do with capitalism because capitalism requires competition.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 27, 2014 10:59 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Frank Black at February 27, 2014 10:59 AM (YmPwQ)
Robespierre went out screaming like a bitch.
-
The mistake was not lying him facing up, so he could watch the blade fall.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 27, 2014 10:59 AM (ZkzmI)
Please, extortion is such an ugly word. I prefer coersion or community organizing.
And if you mention extortion again Ill have your legs broken.
Posted by: Mayor Carmine DePesto at February 27, 2014 10:59 AM (BAS5M)
iirc, according to The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, the titular Horst Wessel, immortalized in the Nazi anthem of the same name, was considering switching from the Nazis to the Communists before he was killed.
Also ironically, there were quite a few people in Europe who joined the Nazis or the Communists specifically because they knew that one of the groups was bad and the other group was the only one actually fighting against them.
Posted by: junior at February 27, 2014 11:00 AM (UWFpX)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 11:00 AM (tyz5J)
Posted by: Jen-Paul Marat at February 27, 2014 11:00 AM (G2iZT)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 11:00 AM (xZxMD)
Posted by: Wayne Storm at February 27, 2014 11:00 AM (DAevm)
::: leans forward intently :::
Tell me more.
Posted by: Kathleen Sebelius at February 27, 2014 11:01 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 27, 2014 11:01 AM (dfYL9)
Actually in some ways I find things like Hannan's piece torture. Because so, so understated. And the gratuitous, baseless, "to be sure"s like that the left has no Nazi characteristics, included, one senses, merely out of politeness.
Tutto nello Stato, niente al di fuori dello Stato, nulla contro lo Stato.
A favorite slogan of the original fascists (Italy). If my numbskull brother ever again lets slip his 60s idiocy associating fascism with "corporations" etc., I'm going to drop that one on him - not that I expect him to be able to gain from it.
We're so far beyond recognizably American that the creepy stuff is beyond keeping track of. One that stands out however is the use of "anti-government" by idiot authoritarians and even the more clueless "centrist" pundits (didn't whatshisname Gerson use this term is one of his notable recent jaw-dropping columns of nonsense?).
Posted by: non-purist at February 27, 2014 11:01 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: Wayne Storm
-
Excellent example. Great Northern never went bankrupt.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 27, 2014 11:01 AM (ZkzmI)
Posted by: Nip Sip at February 27, 2014 11:01 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: Buckeye Abroad at February 27, 2014 11:01 AM (QpIfk)
adjective justice == !justice;
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at February 27, 2014 11:02 AM (4QSOR)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 11:02 AM (tyz5J)
Posted by: Valere, your Iranian Presidental advisor at February 27, 2014 11:02 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: garrett at February 27, 2014 11:02 AM (G2iZT)
Posted by: RS at February 27, 2014 11:02 AM (YAGV/)
Posted by: Lauren at February 27, 2014 11:03 AM (hFL/3)
Posted by: Methos at February 27, 2014 11:03 AM (hO9ad)
Posted by: garrett at February 27, 2014 11:03 AM (G2iZT)
Nice ace. This has always put a burr under my ass.
Nazi were socialist, but don't tell socialist that.
Also, NEVER mention Hitler was a vegetarian.
And an Art Student.
Posted by: --- at February 27, 2014 11:04 AM (MMC8r)
The chair is against the wall. The dog likes his doghouse....
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 03:00 PM (xZxMD)
Marie is in the kitchen.
Junkie in the alley with a baseball bat.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 11:05 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 27, 2014 11:05 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Count de Monet at February 27, 2014 11:05 AM (BAS5M)
Posted by: ace at February 27, 2014 11:05 AM (/FnUH)
Days with the same headlines and then a firehose blast makes for difficult reading.
Posted by: weft cut-loop[/i] [/b] at February 27, 2014 11:05 AM (XKKNz)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:06 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at February 27, 2014 11:06 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Wayne Storm at February 27, 2014 02:56 PM (DAevm)
Competitors of Standard Oil used the Government to break up Standard Oil. That is NOT capitalism. If any of those were friends of Teddy Roosevelt then it was corruption. If not, then it was Fascism.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 27, 2014 11:06 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at February 27, 2014 11:06 AM (g4TxM)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 11:06 AM (xZxMD)
He'd be right at home amongst the 21st-century limousine leftists.
Posted by: HR at February 27, 2014 11:06 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 27, 2014 11:06 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: RomneyBot since 2007 at February 27, 2014 11:07 AM (EvEIZ)
Posted by: NativeNH at February 27, 2014 11:07 AM (ol6Bk)
Posted by: Harry Reid at February 27, 2014 11:07 AM (G2iZT)
RINO's ?
Sorry if that's already been done. I just crawled out from under my rock.
Posted by: eleven at February 27, 2014 11:08 AM (KXm42)
Their breeding habits. Their youth will be put to death before they've had a chance to earn a bullet.
Posted by: Fritz at February 27, 2014 11:08 AM (UzPAd)
Posted by: Jaws at February 27, 2014 11:08 AM (eKZp1)
Posted by: Beck at February 27, 2014 11:08 AM (Q6pxP)
Jonah Goldberg, in his book, mentions that Mussolini started out as a Socialist... right up until he realized that the "international" flavor of the whole thing wouldn't sell in Italy. No one cared. So he gave it a more national flavor (i.e. glory of Rome reborn and all of that), and called it Fascism instead.
Posted by: junior at February 27, 2014 11:08 AM (UWFpX)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 11:08 AM (tyz5J)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 11:08 AM (xZxMD)
Posted by: --- at February 27, 2014 03:04 PM (MMC8r)
He liked dogs and small children...
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 03:06 PM (olDqf)
You know, not many people know zis, but der Fuhrer was a terrific dancer.
Posted by: Franz Leibkin at February 27, 2014 11:08 AM (MMC8r)
I don't think he did. He'd been shot in the face, with his jaw bound poorly. We know a woman ran up to him and told him his death made her happy. He insulted her and told her to go to hell with curses from all wives and mothers. He is reported to have told his executioner to hold up his head afterwards, because it'll be worth it.
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at February 27, 2014 11:09 AM (4QSOR)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 11:09 AM (tyz5J)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff, Rachel Corrie Martyr Brigades at February 27, 2014 11:10 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: DangerGirl and her Sanity Prod (tm) at February 27, 2014 11:10 AM (gaOtJ)
junior on your point about both Commies and Nazis gaining "ahderents" mostly as a tactical step to oppose the other side, I believe the rise of Nazism in Germany from the fringes is mostly - and correctly - attributed to precisely this instinct among the vast majority of non-radical Germans who feared bolshevism above all (not without reason - bolshevism was real and had already commenced its vast depradations on mankind, "Nazism" was a loony fantasy that had more practical appealing elements like return to national dignity, while clearly the strongest anti-bolshevist force). Recall Herr Hitler was going to be "manageable" in the chancellery - nobody outside the party faithful were looking for a new era. I recommend Evans' trilogy starting with The Coming of the Third Reich.
And on an on with the "right wing" nonsense. The mullahocracy in Iran - a radical fringe with vicious tendencies and ruthless expansionary delusions - is "conservative"? Right. Because their religious and secular tendencies are wildly fringe even within Shia' tradition, and have nothing in common with thousands of years of Persian practice and history.
Posted by: non-purist at February 27, 2014 11:10 AM (afQnV)
But while we discuss these nuances and interesting intellectual pursuits, the left is busy trying to destroy the word "conservative", through sheer persistence. For example, by repetitively referring to extremists in other countries (the kind who behead) as "conservatives".
For our lifetimes, it's always been a word with a gentle, positive connotation to the average person. But the left know what happened to the word "liberal" - because people actually hated liberals, not the word - and they know how destructive it was to their cause.
And, while we're faffing around, eyeing their last attack, it's going to work.
Posted by: Mega, AoS Commenter of the Year at February 27, 2014 11:10 AM (hHFOx)
Posted by: Judge Pug at February 27, 2014 11:10 AM (6Nj7A)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at February 27, 2014 11:10 AM (HVff2)
Danton, I believe.
Posted by: torquewrench at February 27, 2014 11:11 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 27, 2014 11:11 AM (6bMel)
Posted by: Wayne Storm at February 27, 2014 03:00 PM (DAevm)
Again corruption. The money and land when to cronies in exorbitant amounts. As soon as the government handouts ended the RR went bankrupt because those cronies pocketed a lot of the money.
That while the RR built strictly private that you referred to prospered.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 27, 2014 11:11 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: non-purist
One in a series of irritating Stupid Leftist Tricks is to hork up the word 'Corporatism' without a shred of understanding.
Posted by: weft cut-loop[/i] [/b] at February 27, 2014 11:11 AM (XKKNz)
Robespierre went out screaming like a bitch.
I don't think he did. He'd been shot in the face, with his jaw bound poorly. We know a woman ran up to him and told him his death made her happy. He insulted her and told her to go to hell with curses from all wives and mothers. He is reported to have told his executioner to hold up his head afterwards, because it'll be worth it.
-
From what I have read, the executioner pulled off the bandage holding up his broken jaw. Said jaw being broken when he attempted to shoot himself in the head the night before. When the bandage was removed, he screamed, and kept on until his lungs and diaphragm were disconnected from his mouth.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 27, 2014 11:12 AM (ZkzmI)
Posted by: lowandslow at February 27, 2014 11:12 AM (IV4od)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 11:12 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Roy at February 27, 2014 11:12 AM (VndSC)
Yes, yes they are. Quite.
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 03:08 PM (xZxMD
You said it; they stink on ice! Pull!
Posted by: Mikey NTH -Clean Up You Caucus! Rumor Soap with Lathering Phosphates at the Outrage Outlet! at February 27, 2014 11:12 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:13 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 03:08 PM (tyz5J)
"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and blow out the margins."
Posted by: EC at February 27, 2014 11:13 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 11:13 AM (tyz5J)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at February 27, 2014 11:13 AM (HVff2)
Posted by: Count de Monet at February 27, 2014 11:13 AM (BAS5M)
Did anyone else first read that as 'asshats'?
Posted by: Methos at February 27, 2014 11:14 AM (hO9ad)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff, Rachel Corrie Martyr Brigades at February 27, 2014 11:14 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: Waterhouse at February 27, 2014 11:14 AM (t8ySh)
Posted by: HR at February 27, 2014 11:14 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: azjaeger at February 27, 2014 11:14 AM (IraXK)
Know what else Hitler was? An anti-smoker.
The way it was explained to me, the Left and Right thing came from which side of the actual aisle the delegates sat on in the French Assembly. And it confused them, too. It's like counting those damned Estates.
Posted by: Stringer Davis at February 27, 2014 11:15 AM (xq1UY)
Could be true, sounds legit.
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at February 27, 2014 11:15 AM (4QSOR)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at February 27, 2014 11:15 AM (g4TxM)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 27, 2014 11:16 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 27, 2014 11:16 AM (dfYL9)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 27, 2014 11:17 AM (ZPrif)
And for the third time, Hitler was heavily into the occult; not at all a Christian.
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 03:02 PM (tyz5J)
^This. He was heavily into Teutonic neo-paganism.
Posted by: Insomniac at February 27, 2014 11:17 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: EH Harriman at February 27, 2014 11:17 AM (Q6pxP)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:17 AM (olDqf)
=========
Told that to the history teacher at the university.
When she got over the "oh crap, this kid knows the stuff we try to hide" she tried to sidestep by saying, "well, some people dispute the accuracy and truth of those transcripts."
yes, yes, of course. There are many different meanings when the USSR wrote "we paid the Rosenbergs money, they gave us secrets."
Posted by: RoyalOil at February 27, 2014 11:17 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 11:17 AM (xZxMD)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at February 27, 2014 11:18 AM (g4TxM)
Posted by: Buckeye Abroad at February 27, 2014 11:18 AM (QpIfk)
Posted by: Judge Pug at February 27, 2014 11:18 AM (6Nj7A)
Posted by: HR at February 27, 2014 11:18 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: ace at February 27, 2014 11:18 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: NativeNH at February 27, 2014 11:19 AM (ol6Bk)
Posted by: ace at February 27, 2014 11:20 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 11:20 AM (bb5+k)
I have no idea if the "suicide" story or the "shot during arrest" story is correct; I'm just noting it's contested.
-
True, nobody knows for sure. One of his loyal lieutenants jumped out of the window of the room and broke a leg. Maybe there was only one pistol, or maybe he was thrown out of the window, who knows?
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 27, 2014 11:21 AM (ZkzmI)
Posted by: Lauren at February 27, 2014 11:21 AM (hFL/3)
-
They were talking about an egg salad recipe.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 11:21 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Nip Sip at February 27, 2014 11:21 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: Wayne Storm at February 27, 2014 11:21 AM (DAevm)
Hitler: anti-smoker, vegetarian, obviously authoritarian and statist. Used to mock Goering's hunting hobby (though mocking the ridiculous Goering for his indulgent lifestyle can hardly be deemed a quirky reaction by Hitler). I believe at least one account has it that the above-ground security forces suspected Der Fuhrer had gone south to his reward in the last days of the war in May '45 when they saw smoke coming out of the bunker vents - smoking had never been allowed in the fuhrerbunker, naturlich (sorry, missed out on the umlaut tutorial in one of yesterday's threads ....).
Posted by: non-purist at February 27, 2014 11:21 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:22 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 27, 2014 11:22 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 11:23 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: RoyalOil at February 27, 2014 03:17 PM (VjL9S)
That's what they say about the earth going around the sun.
Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at February 27, 2014 11:23 AM (kVfSG)
Posted by: sven10077 at February 27, 2014 11:23 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: ace at February 27, 2014 11:24 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 27, 2014 11:24 AM (CJjw5)
they control the media
they control entertainment
look at the internet - you have to really search to find non lefty honest versions of historical events.
-
"There is nothing wrong with your television. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are now in control of the transmission. We control the horizontal and the vertical. We can deluge you with a thousands channels, or expand one single image to crystal clarity and beyond. We can shape your vision to anything our imagination can conceive. For the next hour, we will control all that you see and hear."
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 11:25 AM (XUKZU)
***
Yeah, it's flipped.
For now...
Posted by: B at February 27, 2014 11:25 AM (twiRb)
Posted by: Wayne Storm at February 27, 2014 03:21 PM (DAevm)
There was the 'ox-bow' which was created to add some length, but a vast majority of the winding route is that they did what was possible with manual labor. The route was highly efficient grade wise (much more important than length in operating cost terms) and it was only in the mid-20th century that the mechanized earthmoving equipment was powerful enough to work around the toughest UP grades in Wyoming.
Posted by: EH Harriman at February 27, 2014 11:25 AM (Q6pxP)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 11:26 AM (xZxMD)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 27, 2014 11:26 AM (T2V/1)
76 Oh yeah and the Nazi's hated Commies, just like the Reich wingers due.
Point. Proven.
Posted by: DangerGirl and her Sanity Prod (tm) at February 27, 2014 02:53 PM (4cA6A)
No criminal gang wants a rival.
Posted by: Mikey NTH -Clean Up You Caucus! Rumor Soap with Lathering Phosphates at the Outrage Outlet! at February 27, 2014 11:26 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: Nip Sip at February 27, 2014 11:26 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: Wayne Storm at February 27, 2014 11:26 AM (DAevm)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 03:02 PM (tyz5J)
^This. He was heavily into Teutonic neo-paganism.
Posted by: Insomniac
Not Christian but the Thule Society link is somewhat tenuous. He's on their list but apparently no one could place him at a meeting.
Again, point being he wasn't particularly religious above and beyond trying to mold national and ethnic identity into a totalitarian totem. Aims and means.
Posted by: weft cut-loop[/i] [/b] at February 27, 2014 11:26 AM (XKKNz)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 11:26 AM (tyz5J)
Posted by: ace at February 27, 2014 11:27 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 27, 2014 11:27 AM (dfYL9)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 11:27 AM (bb5+k)
He was actually retracting the Decree on Emergency Government, but with the bullet to the face, you know. They couldn't understand him.
/sarc
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at February 27, 2014 11:28 AM (9PrpA)
ISTR that not many decades ago, describing a writer, artist or musician as "A Man of The Left" (in that term, not merely "Lefty" or what have you) was pretty necessary praise. And this applied in classical music and Bossa Nova, not just a pop-tune thing.
In the Anglosphere at least, before "Hitler" was the universal pejorative, it was "Napoleon." It would be interesting to trace Western cultures via their villains.
Aaron Burr got a lot of traffic in the pre-Civil War era. Cromwell has had his turn in the barrel, on both sides. And Julius Caesar, wow.
"He was at once the best and worst of men. He shined and he stank like rotten mackerel by moonlight."
Posted by: Stringer Davis at February 27, 2014 11:28 AM (xq1UY)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 27, 2014 11:28 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 27, 2014 11:28 AM (SY2Kh)
They even have that same infatuation with race, albeit flipped.
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 03:23 PM (bb5+k)
That's a pretty low hurdle to make - worse than any administration in US history. They are corrupt and their politics come straight from big city machine politics, but they aren't Nazis, or Fascists, or Commies, or Maoists.
Posted by: Mikey NTH -Clean Up You Caucus! Rumor Soap with Lathering Phosphates at the Outrage Outlet! at February 27, 2014 11:28 AM (hLRSq)
Oh, and I understand what people mean when they use the term, but today's vapid American leftwingers (esp. public figures like the ridiculous president) are no more "Marxist" than I am a Zoroastrian. Marxism was an actual, elaborate, intellectually dense and heavy body of thought - almost all of it twaddle and silliness, obviously, but we're talking material far beyond the intellectual scope of an Obama or a Clinton. Grifters with alien values aren't automatically marxists - so that term has also sort of been dumbed-down beyond recognition, this time by "our" side.
Posted by: non-purist at February 27, 2014 11:29 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: Nip Sip at February 27, 2014 11:29 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: Empire of Jeff at February 27, 2014 11:29 AM (CJjw5)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 27, 2014 11:29 AM (oFCZn)
Posted by: jwest at February 27, 2014 11:30 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 11:31 AM (tyz5J)
That is why we never win.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 27, 2014 11:31 AM (T2V/1)
And for many years, the most powerful locomotives in North American rail service were ones specifically dedicated to lugging long freight trains over those grades.
Posted by: torquewrench at February 27, 2014 11:32 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Wayne Storm at February 27, 2014 11:32 AM (DAevm)
Ace got me thinking, instead of usually just laughing or nodding in agreement.
Ancient peoples always started out with human sacrifice to their gods. Eventually almost all moved away from that. So doesn't this show some type of evolution of morals, etc.
It does. But religious ideas or practices is not my focus. It is the underpinning that counts. The unmoved mover.
Just read this article. What stopped eugenic practices? People believing that they were not God over other people.
Posted by: prescient11 at February 27, 2014 11:32 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Romeo13 at February 27, 2014 11:33 AM (84gbM)
Posted by: RWC at February 27, 2014 11:33 AM (MtC8f)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 11:33 AM (xZxMD)
That is why we never win.
Posted by: Vic at February 27, 2014 03:31 PM (T2V/1)
For all of them being followers of one or another of the sub-moronic branches that sprouted off of Marx's tree of sublime idiocy they are doing an awfully poor job of things.
If you can read this, there's your proof.
Posted by: Mikey NTH -Clean Up You Caucus! Rumor Soap with Lathering Phosphates at the Outrage Outlet! at February 27, 2014 11:34 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies with whipped cream. at February 27, 2014 11:34 AM (VtjlW)
Must ....not....comment.....
must....not.......com...ment.....
errrgghhhgrk....
Posted by: eleven at February 27, 2014 11:34 AM (KXm42)
Posted by: tubal at February 27, 2014 11:35 AM (Qzz2p)
"Ce qu'il y a de certain c'est que moi, je ne suis pas Marxiste."
-Marx to Lafargue
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at February 27, 2014 11:36 AM (9PrpA)
Posted by: Judge Pug at February 27, 2014 11:36 AM (6Nj7A)
Hollowpoint, good point about the various internecine rivalries over the ages and how they debunk the suggestion that commie/Nazi enmity was ideological. Nazism was a subset of state-centrism, authoritarianism, updated modernized tyranny using flimsy modern rationalizations to replace the goofball traditional rationalizations ("divine right") used in previous eras. Nazism of course had wacky racial theory/germanocentric rationalizations, whereas commies typically used (the still familiar) excuses of efficiency, "science", etc.
And of course let's not forget the actual links between even some of the more hideous Nazi evil and "progressive" western bullshit, like eugenics. Hallucinogenic eliminationist anti-semitism had nothing to do with popular "progressive" notions in America in the first half of the century - but racial hygiene and euthanasiz and social engineering of the ruthless variety very much did (looking at you, Margaret Sanger).
Posted by: non-purist at February 27, 2014 11:36 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: baldilocks filipova at February 27, 2014 11:36 AM (36Rjy)
Posted by: rickl at February 27, 2014 11:38 AM (zoehZ)
Posted by: tubal at February 27, 2014 11:38 AM (Qzz2p)
Posted by: Golfman in NC at February 27, 2014 11:39 AM (/djtm)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 11:40 AM (bb5+k)
Discussions of fascism always begin with Hitler, and land in France.
Posted by: Stringer Davis at February 27, 2014 11:41 AM (xq1UY)
Today? Venezuela is out of toilet paper.
The more things change with Socialists the more they stay the same - death, famine, and collapse.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 27, 2014 11:42 AM (Nmx3n)
Posted by: YourPoopyPants at February 27, 2014 11:42 AM (Y/HG5)
Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at February 27, 2014 11:42 AM (2oU2+)
Posted by: Mooch at February 27, 2014 11:42 AM (611Rk)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 11:43 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Golfman in NC at February 27, 2014 11:44 AM (/djtm)
Posted by: Judge Pug at February 27, 2014 11:44 AM (6Nj7A)
Underneath the veneer or perhaps guise of fairness and "balanced" reporting lies a prejudiced worldview. It's been nurtured not only by the reporters personal upbringing and enforced by so-called "journalism" schools who promote and teach it. But it's also rewarded by those in power or their organizations. No matter how dishonest, untrue or jaded. Gone is the integrity, independence and factual discovery process the average free person cherishes and ultimately endears them to that profession.
Journalists at one time held a special place in Americans heats and indeed our democracy. Our right, as a people, not some tribe or parochial group was enshrined in our constitution because it is fundamental to the working of a prosperous and free democratic republic. Yet now that someone whom they agree with philosophically or perhaps politically is in charge, they demur, color, taint and propagandize at the our expense- facts and freedoms be damned. That is, until someone they may not agree with is in charge, then the hypocrisy starts.
This has of course happened incrementally over they years until Barack Obama. Now it is in full swing, because the entire wretched philosophy and its impact is in full view. That doesn't bode well for the future because there is an enormous amount of contempt and animosity built up. In history, as you've aptly noted Ace, that has not ended well.
Posted by: Marcus T at February 27, 2014 11:45 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 11:46 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Mikey NTH -Clean Up You Caucus! Rumor Soap with Lathering
Phosphates at the Outrage Outlet! at February 27, 2014 03:34 PM (hLRSq)
I was mostly educated before LBJ completed his destruction and long before Carter created the Dept of Education and destroyed the schools.,
If you take the most recent graduates a large percentage of them probably can not read it and understand it.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 27, 2014 11:47 AM (T2V/1)
Dunno about the origins of what became the NSAPD starting in a homo's club, but Rohm and some of his SA leadership were light in the jackboots, and this provided a nice motivator/excuse for what the others wanted to do anyway, resulting in the Night of the Long Knives. But definitely about power, not about Rohm's bedroom proclivities.
In any case, the anti-smoking, vegetarian, anti-hunting, anti-Christian pro-pagan stuff is all definitely true about Hitler, and works well enough to confound the dim "leftists" we live among - all these things are immaterial to Nazism per se, but these people don't think much differently than 12-yr olds, so these little associational slanders work just fine.
Posted by: non-purist at February 27, 2014 11:48 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: FritzB at February 27, 2014 11:50 AM (I2IdM)
Posted by: Snowflake at February 27, 2014 11:52 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Meriadoc at February 27, 2014 11:54 AM (OB4KJ)
Posted by: Lars Kasch at February 27, 2014 11:55 AM (DAevm)
Posted by: Speller at February 27, 2014 11:57 AM (J74Py)
Posted by: goy at February 27, 2014 11:59 AM (oGez1)
pg 6. The Nazis and the Occult. Dusty Sklar.
Unscrupulous men - Holden, Soros and Ayers?
Anti-Semites - Samantha Powers?
Fuhrer or light worker - The President?
Do away with democracy - Executive orders and selective law enforcement.
Geez the corollaries are frightening.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 27, 2014 12:05 PM (Nmx3n)
Posted by: Meriadoc at February 27, 2014 12:08 PM (OB4KJ)
Posted by: Beryl at February 27, 2014 12:20 PM (rNlBO)
Posted by: teapartydoc at February 27, 2014 12:22 PM (4U98b)
Posted by: palooka at February 27, 2014 12:43 PM (5SF6v)
Posted by: I'd rather be surfin at February 27, 2014 01:20 PM (OU1Hh)
Posted by: I'd rather be surfin at February 27, 2014 01:41 PM (OU1Hh)
Posted by: That Fucking Guy at February 28, 2014 03:44 AM (lyvVo)
Posted by: davem at February 28, 2014 07:21 AM (E2g2d)
The British Tories, or conservative, were for God, King, and country. American got rid of lunics like George the III and Prince Charles of England long ago, and do not want their return. Conservative in the United States stand for Constitutional government. In other words the smallest government possible. National Socialist stand for the largest government possible. As a side note: Hitler got paid everytime his picture was used, and the German government put it everywhere, including postage stamps. Their government was Hitler. There are no rational comparisions between American conservatives and National Socialism. Just more liberal BS.
Posted by: burt at February 28, 2014 07:27 AM (1+kJ5)
Posted by: TanarUr at February 28, 2014 09:11 AM (ZVxx5)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2876 seconds, 426 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: DangerGirl and her Sanity Prod (tm) at February 27, 2014 10:34 AM (4cA6A)