May 08, 2014
— Ace I haven't written about this because honestly I continue not to understand it. I read almost the entire order shutting down the investigation (providing injunctive relief telling the progressive prosecutors from five counties to Shut It Down) and I looked up other writers discussing it but I still don't really understand what the prosecutors were doing.
John Ekdahl brought it up on the podcast a few times, and I didn't understand it then, either.
Well, I understand only the vaguest outline of it:
Prosecutors from five, get this, progressive-leaning counties were conducting a never-ending investigation into groups that just happened to support the union-limiting reforms in Wisconsin, based on a flawed reading (or deliberate misreading?) of campaign finance laws, and furthermore demanded that each target of the probe (and there were many) remain absolutely silent about it.
A judge has shut this anti-democratic, thuggish abuse of conservatives down.
The four-year effort by Democratic prosecutors to criminalize political speech in Wisconsin has hit the wall of the U.S. Constitution. In a ruling that could have consequences nationwide, federal judge Rudolph Randa issued a preliminary injunction Tuesday ending the secret John Doe probe of allies of Governor Scott Walker.We've been telling you for months about the secret Wisconsin John Doe, which operates like a grand jury and forces targets to remain silent. The targets are right-of-center groups disliked by Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm, his special prosecutor Francis Schmitz, and the left-leaning state Government Accountability Board that regulates campaign finance...
Prosecutors had justified their dawn raids and harassment in the name of exposing illegal coordination between the Walker campaign and conservative groups. But Judge Randa ruled that the investigation was based on a mistaken reading of campaign-finance law that violated Mr. O'Keefe's First Amendment's rights.
One of the judge's key findings was that the law, supposedly put in place to prevent corruption and the rigging of political contests, cannot be permitted to be used as a club for corruption and the rigging of the political contests.
There's a minor epilogue as Judge Randa's order was technically defective but now he's reissued a correct order.
Update: This 2013 Legal Insurrection post seems to explain some of it.
As I understand it, the main complaint was that prosecutorial resources were being warped for partisan purposes.
As Wisconsin Reporter first revealed, the investigation, launched in early 2012 by the Democrat-led Milwaukee County District AttorneyÂ’s office, aims to prove conservatives illegally coordinated activities in the historic recalls of Gov. Scott Walker and Republican state senators, multiple sources say.One source with knowledge of the investigation has told Wisconsin Reporter the ultimate goal is to bring down Walker, the bane of Wisconsin liberals.
Conservative targets and others close to Wisconsin’s latest politically charged John Doe contend the probe is nothing more than a “taxpayer-funded, opposition-research campaign.”
“This is not a question of what conservatives did wrong. It’s a question of one party in this state using prosecutorial powers to conduct a one-sided investigation into conservatives,” said one source who spoke on condition of anonymity due to his proximity to the probe.
What is striking is that no liberal organizations appear to be targeted in the John Doe, particularly interesting in light of the tens of millions of dollars pumped into WisconsinÂ’s unprecedented spate of recalls in 2011 and 2012 by union and left-leaning groups.
And it should be noted that these prosecutors were searching for evidence in their probe. One can then wonder why they didn't also think of searching for evidence of illegal coordination among Walker's opponents.
Posted by: Ace at
01:32 PM
| Comments (277)
Post contains 621 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: mallfly at May 08, 2014 01:35 PM (bJm7W)
Posted by: Lois Lerner at May 08, 2014 01:35 PM (w562C)
Posted by: pep at May 08, 2014 01:35 PM (4nR9/)
Posted by: locomotivebreath1901 at May 08, 2014 01:35 PM (K3RTK)
Posted by: D-Lamp at May 08, 2014 01:37 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: t-bird at May 08, 2014 01:37 PM (FcR7P)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 01:38 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: D-Lamp at May 08, 2014 01:40 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 01:40 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Minority Report at May 08, 2014 01:41 PM (1UWg+)
And yet.....he's still an amnestista.
Posted by: pep at May 08, 2014 01:41 PM (4nR9/)
Posted by: joeindc44 at May 08, 2014 01:41 PM (FQLT3)
Posted by: lyle at May 08, 2014 01:41 PM (PsvAT)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 01:42 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: TimothyJ at May 08, 2014 01:42 PM (ep2io)
There is a federal civil rights lawsuit ongoing with 1st Ammendment stalwart David Rivkin taking the lead as counsel for the conservatives targeted. They are going after the John Doe investigating DA's civilly also so they will have personal liability in this not covered by the taxpayers.
Rivkin also is intimating that the Government Accountability Board (GAB) which is supposed to be non-partisan was working hand in hand with the investigation...a major no no which could likely lead to its dissolution which would be great for the State of Wisconsin.
The DA's are going to pay for this one out of their own pockets big time...they've likely destroyed their own families in the attempt to take out Walker and they deserve everything that happens to them.
OKeefe deserves high praise for risking it and speaking out in the WSJ against the gag order that these DA's put out to anyone involved in the investigation
Posted by: H Badger at May 08, 2014 01:42 PM (n/0Nw)
Posted by: Soothsayer § at May 08, 2014 01:42 PM (KxmPO)
Posted by: Jackie Chiles at May 08, 2014 01:42 PM (4nR9/)
Posted by: joeindc44
Sweet! That means civil suit with damages, right??
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i][/b] at May 08, 2014 01:43 PM (JmGFJ)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 08, 2014 01:43 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Jackie Chiles [/i][/b][/s][/u] at May 08, 2014 01:43 PM (yz6yg)
In olden times would have been called Inquisitors or Witch Finders. In the USSR, the KGB.
Someone needs to pay dearly for this malfeasance.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 08, 2014 01:44 PM (HZkuJ)
Posted by: Soothsayer § at May 08, 2014 01:44 PM (KxmPO)
Do you have a life, or is this pretty much it?
Posted by: pep at May 08, 2014 01:44 PM (4nR9/)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 08, 2014 01:44 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 01:45 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: toby928© at May 08, 2014 01:45 PM (QupBk)
26 Didn't the circuit court put aside this ruling?
Posted by: TimothyJ at May 08, 2014 05:42 PM (ep2io)
----------
I was wondering the same thing.
Apparently not?
Posted by: wheatie at May 08, 2014 01:45 PM (l/M30)
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at May 08, 2014 01:45 PM (BZAd3)
Posted by: Soothsayer § at May 08, 2014 01:45 PM (KxmPO)
Posted by: Some blonde old hag who wants to be president at May 08, 2014 01:45 PM (49izV)
Posted by: Union Loving Leftie at May 08, 2014 01:45 PM (IN7k+)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 08, 2014 01:46 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Every So-called progressive Everywhere at May 08, 2014 01:46 PM (0cMkb)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 01:46 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: D-Lamp at May 08, 2014 01:46 PM (bb5+k)
Anyone remember this jerkoff and what he was doing?
Posted by: Soothsayer
Do you mean Ronnie Earle, the prosecutor who torched Tom Delay?
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i][/b] at May 08, 2014 01:47 PM (JmGFJ)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at May 08, 2014 01:47 PM (8ZskC)
It's outrageous, egregious, preposterous.
Not to mention boisterous, anomalous, and lugubrious.
Posted by: Jackie Chiles at May 08, 2014 01:47 PM (4nR9/)
MILWAUKEE (WRN) For the second time in three days, a federal judge has ordered a halt to the John Doe probe into campaign activities surrounding WisconsinÂ’s recall elections.
Just a day after a federal appeals court stayed his initial order in the case, Judge Rudolph Randa ruled that an appeal by prosecutors to keep the investigation going was frivolous. The decision puts a preliminary injunction back in place ordering an end to the probe and the destruction of evidence.
Posted by: The Jackhole at May 08, 2014 01:47 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Wisconsin at May 08, 2014 01:47 PM (Dwehj)
Posted by: Daybrother at May 08, 2014 01:47 PM (mTyRc)
Posted by: Soothsayer § at May 08, 2014 01:47 PM (KxmPO)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 08, 2014 01:48 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: joeindc44 at May 08, 2014 01:48 PM (FQLT3)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 08, 2014 01:48 PM (aDwsi)
There's the problem. It's an iron law of politics; if a politician's position on amnesty isn't clear, he's for it.
Posted by: pep at May 08, 2014 01:48 PM (4nR9/)
Posted by: D-Lamp at May 08, 2014 01:48 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/b][/s][/u] at May 08, 2014 01:49 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: Milwaukee County DA John Chisholm, et al. at May 08, 2014 01:49 PM (1CroS)
Posted by: Kreplach at May 08, 2014 01:49 PM (8tAEF)
Posted by: Soothsayer § at May 08, 2014 01:49 PM (KxmPO)
Posted by: Wisconsin at May 08, 2014 01:50 PM (Dwehj)
Wisconsin Club for Growth attorney David Rivkin praised the decision, saying Judge Randa corrected a technical oversight identified by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Rivkin says the decision re-affirms that “the John Doe probe is an abuse of government power to target private citizens for exercising their free speech rights.”
Posted by: The Jackhole at May 08, 2014 01:50 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: joeindc44 at May 08, 2014 01:50 PM (FQLT3)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at May 08, 2014 01:50 PM (+lsX1)
Posted by: Cosmo Kramer [/i][/b][/s][/u] at May 08, 2014 01:50 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: teh Left at May 08, 2014 01:50 PM (FXTmE)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 01:50 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: D-Lamp at May 08, 2014 01:50 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: toby928© at May 08, 2014 01:50 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Soothsayer § at May 08, 2014 01:51 PM (KxmPO)
While technically not illegal it is never done.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at May 08, 2014 01:51 PM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 08, 2014 01:51 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: 7 Days in May at May 08, 2014 01:51 PM (5V+Di)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 08, 2014 01:52 PM (HZkuJ)
Yeah, I wonder if McDonnell's wife regrets pressuring him to accept jewelry. Could'a had the big house.
Posted by: pep at May 08, 2014 01:52 PM (4nR9/)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 01:52 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: AFGE Local 1 [/i][/b][/s][/u] at May 08, 2014 01:52 PM (yz6yg)
"Early in the case, Democratic Milwaukee County District Attorney John Chisholm and the others asked Randa to throw out the case, arguing they are immune from lawsuit as prosecutors and state officials. They also argued the case should be dismissed because federal courts are often barred from getting involved in state proceedings. "
Under the "no tag backs" clause of the Wisconsin State Constitution....
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 08, 2014 01:52 PM (kdS6q)
Anyone remember this jerkoff and what he was doing?
Posted by: Soothsayer § at May 08, 2014 05:44 PM (KxmPO)
Don't recall his name, but he was prosecuting Tom Delay. (Since exonerated.) Posted by: D-Lamp at May 08, 2014 05:50 PM (bb5+k)<<<
Avenge me!
Posted by: zombie Ted Stevens at May 08, 2014 01:52 PM (FXTmE)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 08, 2014 01:52 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 08, 2014 01:52 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Soona at May 08, 2014 01:52 PM (g+d/y)
Posted by: Daybrother at May 08, 2014 01:53 PM (ktO4n)
Posted by: Wisconsin at May 08, 2014 01:53 PM (Dwehj)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/b][/s][/u] at May 08, 2014 01:53 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at May 08, 2014 01:53 PM (ZkzmI)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 01:53 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 01:53 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 08, 2014 01:54 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: The FEC at May 08, 2014 01:54 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/b][/s][/u] at May 08, 2014 01:54 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: joeindc44 at May 08, 2014 01:54 PM (FQLT3)
Posted by: Soothsayer § at May 08, 2014 01:55 PM (KxmPO)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 08, 2014 01:55 PM (9W+0f)
This reminds me of something. It's vague, but I seem to recall not too long ago some asshole prosecutor in Texas, I think, who was doing some nasty shit.
Anyone remember this jerkoff and what he was doing?
--
Yes, but he's dead now.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at May 08, 2014 01:55 PM (ZkzmI)
Posted by: D-Lamp at May 08, 2014 05:50 PM (bb5+k)
It was Ronnie Earl and he is now still practicing lawfare after the TX Supreme Court reversed the conviction he plans on appealing that reversal. I have no idea who he is going to appeal it to. DeLay was hounded from office by the RNCe because they believe in purity.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at May 08, 2014 01:55 PM (T2V/1)
Remember way back to the 2008 election when some Missouri prosecutors and sheriffs were going to arrest people for campaigning against obama.
That was an early indication of this tactic that the Dems have since been employing. This story from WI, IRS, EPA, BLM, DOJ, DOE, FBI, NASA, etc; all now used to politically target the Right.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at May 08, 2014 01:55 PM (hJauc)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 08, 2014 01:56 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Soothsayer § at May 08, 2014 01:56 PM (KxmPO)
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 08, 2014 01:56 PM (84gbM)
"He issued a sweeping order calling not only for the probe to be closed but for evidence to be returned to the defendants and the prosecutors' notes to be destroyed. He said any effort to revive the probe would result in contempt order."
Posted by: The Jackhole at May 08, 2014 01:56 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Zombie Zappa at May 08, 2014 01:56 PM (CJ1mO)
Also, the Journal-Sentinel makes sure to run the story with a picture of Gov. Scott Walker giving his troops the traditional Republican "Hitlergruss".
http://tinyurl.com/oklngxq
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 08, 2014 01:57 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 01:57 PM (gmeXX)
@26 Didn't the circuit court put aside this ruling?
-----------------------------
They put aside his previous ruling, which was pretty much identical. But they listed the technical reasons why that ruling didn't work, and outlined how to fix the ruling so that it would work. This is Judge Randa's ruling with all of the fixes in place.
Posted by: junior at May 08, 2014 01:57 PM (UWFpX)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 08, 2014 01:57 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at May 08, 2014 01:57 PM (1CroS)
Posted by: Kreplach at May 08, 2014 01:58 PM (8tAEF)
Posted by: Hello it's me Donna and I know nuthink! at May 08, 2014 01:58 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 01:58 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/b][/s][/u] at May 08, 2014 01:58 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: eman at May 08, 2014 01:59 PM (EWsrI)
Posted by: The Illusionist at May 08, 2014 01:59 PM (1UWg+)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 08, 2014 02:00 PM (9W+0f)
112...Doesn't that mean they are ONLY auditing TEA party folks?
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 08, 2014 05:56 PM (84gbM)
-----------
And people who donate to them...so, Yes.
Posted by: wheatie at May 08, 2014 02:00 PM (l/M30)
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 08, 2014 02:00 PM (84gbM)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at May 08, 2014 02:00 PM (ZkzmI)
From this morning link I had:
The Scott Walker "win" in court has been delayed by an appeals court. More lawfare from the Dems.
http://tinyurl.com/nnwm3o3
Posted by: Vic[/i] at May 08, 2014 02:00 PM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Soothsayer § at May 08, 2014 02:01 PM (KxmPO)
Posted by: joeindc44 at May 08, 2014 02:01 PM (FQLT3)
Posted by: The "Base" at May 08, 2014 02:01 PM (pmsMR)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 02:02 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at May 08, 2014 02:03 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Daybrother at May 08, 2014 02:03 PM (NpT96)
Posted by: Colorado Alex at May 08, 2014 02:03 PM (tIvOy)
Posted by: real joe at May 08, 2014 02:03 PM (xXhgd)
Posted by: Soothsayer § at May 08, 2014 02:03 PM (KxmPO)
Posted by: Madamex at May 08, 2014 02:04 PM (vaWdD)
Posted by: toby928© believes that localism is the key at May 08, 2014 02:04 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 08, 2014 02:04 PM (aJd5W)
@132Didn't a WI appeals court issue a stay on this judge's stay?
From this morning link I had:
The Scott Walker "win" in court has been delayed by an appeals court. More lawfare from the Dems.
http://tinyurl.com/nnwm3o3
--------------------------
As the link points out, the appeals court basically told Randa how to fix the injunction. Which he did. Ace's post is about the fixed version of the injunction, which now must be appealed on its merits instead of on a legal technicality.
Or in other words, the investigators need to try and convince the higher court that their fishing expedition is justified.
Posted by: junior at May 08, 2014 02:04 PM (UWFpX)
Posted by: joeindc44 at May 08, 2014 02:04 PM (FQLT3)
Posted by: D-Lamp at May 08, 2014 02:04 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Killerdog at May 08, 2014 02:05 PM (49izV)
Posted by: Hacker, Mockery, and Snark LLC at May 08, 2014 02:05 PM (1UWg+)
Posted by: toby928© believes that localism is the key at May 08, 2014 02:05 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 02:05 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 08, 2014 02:05 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Soothsayer Madden § at May 08, 2014 02:05 PM (KxmPO)
Posted by: Inspector Cussword at May 08, 2014 02:05 PM (p4vr9)
Posted by: Damiano at May 08, 2014 02:05 PM (j0wOO)
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at May 08, 2014 02:06 PM (yh0zB)
Posted by: toby928© believes that localism is the key at May 08, 2014 02:06 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Madamex at May 08, 2014 02:07 PM (vaWdD)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 02:07 PM (gmeXX)
Rivkin, the attorney for the Wisconsin Club for Growth, said he will seek monetary damages from prosecutors for violating the group's constitutional rights. Randa said in Thursday's order he would not consider such a request while the appeal is pending, so that issue will be put off at least for now.
Hans von Spakovsky, a fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation and a former member of the Federal Election Commission said he believes the Wisconsin Club for Growth would be able to recover attorneys fees but not the damages they are seeking. To do that, they would have to prove prosecutors knowingly and intentionally acted maliciously. "That is a very high bar," he said.
Lot's of one way streets in this part of town....
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 08, 2014 02:09 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 02:09 PM (gmeXX)
When the law no longer serves the ends of justice and fairness, I cannot see why I should be bound to it.
"No Justice, No Peace!" ain't that what you fuckers used to chant?
Posted by: RoyalOil at May 08, 2014 02:09 PM (VjL9S)
Posted by: D-Lamp at May 08, 2014 02:10 PM (bb5+k)
Ha! If it were in Boston the investigative team would have been offered coffee and blow jobs. #shelterinplaceyouweakmofos
Posted by: BEL at May 08, 2014 02:10 PM (thLL8)
Confused, but if I understand correctly, the District judge yesterday smacks down these prosecutors. The prosecutors filed an emergency appeal.
Last night the appeals court reviews it and reverses the ruling based on some technicalities. Literally some forgot to cross the t's and dot the i's level of bullshit. Appeals court judge doesn't seem to sympathised with the prosecutors though, as his ruling included step by step instructions on how to fix the technicality.
Today the district judge applied said fixes and now all is well with the ruling.
Or am I more lost and confused then I think I am?
Posted by: Carnivorus Herbavore at May 08, 2014 02:10 PM (h0ygp)
Unlike libertarians who only seem to care about social issues and drugs, my primary libertarian concern is on economic issues.
Posted by: SH
How much drugs cost.....
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at May 08, 2014 02:10 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: toby928© believes that localism is the key at May 08, 2014 02:11 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 02:11 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at May 08, 2014 02:12 PM (BZAd3)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 08, 2014 02:12 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 08, 2014 02:13 PM (aJd5W)
Posted by: Jackie Chiles at May 08, 2014 05:43 PM (yz6yg)
Don't forget pusillanimous. Definitely pusillanimous.
Posted by: troyriser at May 08, 2014 02:13 PM (gNlvW)
@165Confused, but if I understand correctly, the District judge yesterday smacks down these prosecutors. The prosecutors filed an emergency appeal.
Last night the appeals court reviews it and reverses the ruling based on some technicalities. Literally some forgot to cross the t's and dot the i's level of bullshit. Appeals court judge doesn't seem to sympathised with the prosecutors though, as his ruling included step by step instructions on how to fix the technicality.
Today the district judge applied said fixes and now all is well with the ruling.
Or am I more lost and confused then I think I am?
-------------------------
That's exactly right. The confusion seems to be with people who don't realize that today's injunction by Randa is a fix to the issues that the appeals court found.
Posted by: junior at May 08, 2014 02:13 PM (UWFpX)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 05:52 PM (gmeXX)
I'm not. This is my red line, my hill. I can cut a pol some slack on less important issues, but not this one. Besides, I've heard Walker talking about amnesty, followed by the usual "clarifications" about how you misunderstood what he meant. No, I didn't.
Posted by: pep at May 08, 2014 02:13 PM (4nR9/)
Posted by: D-Lamp at May 08, 2014 02:13 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 08, 2014 02:14 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: pep at May 08, 2014 05:52 PM (4nR9/)
The one in Lorton, right?
Posted by: Sean Bannion at May 08, 2014 05:53 PM (yz6yg)
She should fit right in with the other bored housewives there who fancy themselves artists. (There are actually some good ones)
Posted by: pep at May 08, 2014 02:14 PM (4nR9/)
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at May 08, 2014 02:16 PM (BZAd3)
Posted by: Damiano at May 08, 2014 02:16 PM (j0wOO)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 02:17 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: grammie winger at May 08, 2014 02:17 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: Lester at May 08, 2014 02:17 PM (2UPXV)
Posted by: Soothsayer § at May 08, 2014 05:55 PM (KxmPO)
Yep, sure do. I don't remember the jackasses name, but I do remember that his department then shot and killed a former Marine in a no-knock warrant raid on his house.
Posted by: GGE of the Moron Horde, NC Chapter at May 08, 2014 02:18 PM (yh0zB)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 02:19 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: richard mcenroe at May 08, 2014 02:20 PM (XO6WW)
Posted by: Soona at May 08, 2014 02:21 PM (g+d/y)
The good of the many outweigh the needs of the few.
Posted by: Spock at May 08, 2014 02:21 PM (thLL8)
Posted by: grammie winger at May 08, 2014 02:22 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at May 08, 2014 02:23 PM (NvZnr)
Posted by: grammie winger at May 08, 2014 02:25 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: no good deed at May 08, 2014 02:25 PM (ILBCY)
When the run-off happens, send the mercenary Gene packing.
And make sure Trish Causey, one of the Democrat candidates who said Benghazi makes 'Republicans have orgasms,' is utterly crushed and sent back to her NYC digs.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 08, 2014 02:25 PM (HZkuJ)
Posted by: imp at May 08, 2014 02:25 PM (XIXZz)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 02:25 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Pretty much something Oblammer said at May 08, 2014 02:26 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 02:27 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: chemjeff at May 08, 2014 02:27 PM (x0oWB)
Posted by: Pretty much something Oblammer said at May 08, 2014 02:27 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 08, 2014 02:28 PM (HZkuJ)
Posted by: imp at May 08, 2014 02:28 PM (XIXZz)
Posted by: grammie winger at May 08, 2014 02:29 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 02:29 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: no good deed at May 08, 2014 06:25 PM (ILBCY)
--------------------------------------------
They've thrown everything at her. She's like Walker. She keeps her head high and soldiers on. I'm sure the phrase "fuck 'em" is used by both individuals.
Posted by: Soona at May 08, 2014 02:30 PM (g+d/y)
Posted by: grammie winger at May 08, 2014 02:31 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 06:29 PM (nqBYe)
--------------------------------------
Not really. This is pretty much it. If we go down, the light goes out.
Posted by: Soona at May 08, 2014 02:32 PM (g+d/y)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 02:32 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Pretty much something Oblammer said at May 08, 2014 06:26 PM (aDwsi)
++++
Now you're talking my language. I always thought, "If only I had more agents everywhere, what great goods I could have accomplished."
Posted by: J. Edgar Hoover at May 08, 2014 02:32 PM (IN7k+)
Posted by: grammie winger at May 08, 2014 02:33 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: Y-not at May 08, 2014 02:33 PM (zDsvJ)
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 08, 2014 05:56 PM (84gbM)
Since you put it that way, getting audited by the IRS two years ago makes me feel ever so special.
Posted by: troyriser at May 08, 2014 02:34 PM (gNlvW)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 02:34 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Ray Van Dune at May 08, 2014 02:35 PM (5APFN)
Posted by: Y-not at May 08, 2014 06:33 PM (zDsvJ)
-----------------------------------------
Heh.
Posted by: Soona at May 08, 2014 02:35 PM (g+d/y)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 02:37 PM (gmeXX)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 02:37 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 08, 2014 02:37 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 02:39 PM (nqBYe)
221 Dems love to pass reform laws. It gives them insider info on how to subvert them and use them to punish others.
----------
ObamaCare was sold as a 'reform', remember?
I would say that "Dems love to use the cover of 'reform' to pass their tyrannical laws".
They are predators.
All we needed were a few simple healthcare reforms.
The Dems prey on the need for a reform and use it as an excuse to take ever more Control over our lives.
Posted by: wheatie at May 08, 2014 02:39 PM (l/M30)
and then, progressives wanted power, and lied, and cheated, and
anyway, Surprised this dumb ass LIV.
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 06:34 PM (nqBYe)
-----------------------------------------------
I remember being in a conversation with some people right after 9/11. Everyone was commenting on how it had finally brought the nation together for a common cause. I told them that all the seeming unity they were seeing was the beginning of the real division of this country, and that it'll start in a month or so. Only one other person agreed with me.
We were wrong. It started within two weeks.
Posted by: Soona at May 08, 2014 02:40 PM (g+d/y)
The no-knock SWAT raid that killed that guy trying to defend his home was just another example. And Dupnik was one of those law officers who refused to enforce Arizona's immigration law.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 08, 2014 02:40 PM (HZkuJ)
Posted by: Y-not at May 08, 2014 02:41 PM (zDsvJ)
Why didn't Team Walker orchestrate five Republican prosecutors doing the same thing fishing thru the union's shit.
Posted by: Jean at May 08, 2014 02:42 PM (TETYm)
223 Women suck at driving.
Posted by: NCKate at May 08, 2014 06:35 PM (mEJkS)
-------
Pffft.
I've never caused an accident.
And the only accidents I have ever been involved in were caused by a male driver.
Posted by: wheatie at May 08, 2014 02:42 PM (l/M30)
Posted by: no good deed at May 08, 2014 02:44 PM (ILBCY)
Posted by: EC at May 08, 2014 02:44 PM (doBIb)
Posted by: Hello it's me Donna and I know nuthink! at May 08, 2014 02:44 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 02:45 PM (nqBYe)
Based on my own experience...I could make a stupid generalization and say:
"Men suck at driving."
But I would be wrong.
However, I think there is probably some truth in the statement:
"Liberal women suck at driving."
Posted by: wheatie at May 08, 2014 02:45 PM (l/M30)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 08, 2014 02:46 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Jean at May 08, 2014 02:46 PM (TETYm)
http://tinyurl.com/lflfqfh
Posted by: chemjeff at May 08, 2014 02:46 PM (x0oWB)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 02:47 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: HR stuck at work and the vending machine is out of Cheetos at May 08, 2014 02:47 PM (/kI1Q)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 08, 2014 02:48 PM (HZkuJ)
Posted by: Hello it's me Donna and I know nuthink! at May 08, 2014 02:48 PM (9+ccr)
Posted by: alexthechick - Oh save us mighty SMOD at May 08, 2014 02:48 PM (dMSj2)
Posted by: RWC at May 08, 2014 02:49 PM (QeH9j)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at May 08, 2014 02:49 PM (HZkuJ)
239...Caused by male drivers getting distracted by you?
Posted by: EC at May 08, 2014 06:44 PM (doBIb)
---------
Heh.
Not my fault if they were.
Eyes on the road, fellas. Eyes on the road.
Posted by: wheatie at May 08, 2014 02:49 PM (l/M30)
Posted by: chemjeff at May 08, 2014 02:50 PM (x0oWB)
Posted by: no good deed at May 08, 2014 02:50 PM (ILBCY)
Posted by: SH at May 08, 2014 05:57 PM (gmeXX)
Fuck no; he enabled the Repuke side of the GWB spending bonanza. The difference between the RINOs and conservatives is that conservatives can still acknowledge that Ronnie Earl should be deep in a Yemen jail for what he did to the Hammer. The fucking Repukes would look away and go tsk tsk.
Posted by: Captain Hate at May 08, 2014 02:50 PM (qiiIB)
Posted by: Infidel at May 08, 2014 02:51 PM (Z1SI2)
Posted by: Y-not at May 08, 2014 02:52 PM (zDsvJ)
Posted by: Jean at May 08, 2014 02:53 PM (TETYm)
http://tinyurl.com/lflfqfh
Posted by: chemjeff at May 08, 2014 06:46 PM (x0oWB)
---------------------------------------------
We should hope. But I think the IRS is fully in the grasp of the regime. Too many fanboys and girls that have pledged their allegience to the lightworker.
Posted by: Soona at May 08, 2014 02:53 PM (g+d/y)
Posted by: TheThinMan at May 08, 2014 02:53 PM (KJXYt)
257 Anyone else see the Gowdy interview on The Kelley File last night. He's fearless and like a dog with a bone.
Posted by: Infidel at May 08, 2014 06:51 PM (Z1SI2)
----------
Yes, I did!
And Yes...he's awesome.
Posted by: wheatie at May 08, 2014 02:53 PM (l/M30)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 02:53 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: no good deed at May 08, 2014 02:54 PM (ILBCY)
Posted by: chemjeff at May 08, 2014 02:54 PM (x0oWB)
I didn't see the interview on the Kelley Files, but I did see the epic smackdown he delivered to the media.
Oh, I didn't see that one.
Posted by: Infidel at May 08, 2014 02:55 PM (Z1SI2)
Posted by: willow at May 08, 2014 02:57 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: wheatie at May 08, 2014 02:57 PM (l/M30)
Posted by: RWC at May 08, 2014 02:58 PM (QeH9j)
Posted by: no good deed at May 08, 2014 03:01 PM (ILBCY)
Posted by: TheThinMan at May 08, 2014 03:01 PM (LttFA)
Posted by: toby928© believes that localism is the key at May 08, 2014 03:02 PM (QupBk)
so if R's do take back Congress in 2014, could they then pass an enabling act that would allow Texas to split into 5 states?
would Obama have to sign it? the Constitution just says that Congress has to approve, not the President. but I don't know for certain.
Posted by: chemjeff at May 08, 2014 03:04 PM (x0oWB)
Posted by: alexthechick - Oh save us mighty SMOD at May 08, 2014 03:06 PM (dMSj2)
Posted by: Bill H at May 08, 2014 04:54 PM (3sZO1)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4078 seconds, 405 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Teh Left at May 08, 2014 01:34 PM (FcR7P)