February 27, 2014
— Ace Yup.
There's an old saying, said of Europeans' endless fretting about fascism growing in America: "Fascism is forever descending upon America, but landing in Europe."
Liberals are pretty sure that fascism is growing whenever there's a Republican in office, but when a progressive president begins asserting he has the right to rewrite the laws by his own personal whim, they just don't notice.
Or they pretend not to.
Posted by: Ace at
11:28 AM
| Comments (276)
Post contains 108 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 27, 2014 11:29 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 27, 2014 11:31 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 27, 2014 11:32 AM (oFCZn)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 11:32 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 27, 2014 11:32 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at February 27, 2014 11:33 AM (A0sHn)
@6 Why can't I always be right about good things that benefit me personally?
----------------------------
Maybe you could be right about good things that'll benefit the rest of us? Maybe you could predict that in four or five years I'll be a multi-millionaire?
Posted by: junior at February 27, 2014 11:33 AM (UWFpX)
Posted by: HR at February 27, 2014 11:33 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: jwest at February 27, 2014 11:34 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 27, 2014 11:34 AM (T2V/1)
It's a tax.
Posted by: The Dread Justice Roberts at February 27, 2014 11:34 AM (gqT4g)
Indeed, the lawlessness of these judges is beyond me. Read the dissent in the 9th Cir. conceal carry case and tell me exactly how this judge is not impeached or removed.
Fucking POS tyrant should be tarred and feathered and run off the bench.
That or he is literally so fucking stupid he should be got rid of immediately.
Posted by: prescient11 at February 27, 2014 11:35 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 11:35 AM (tyz5J)
Posted by: sven10077 at February 27, 2014 11:35 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: Citizen X at February 27, 2014 11:35 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: John McCain at February 27, 2014 11:35 AM (Q6pxP)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 11:36 AM (tyz5J)
Posted by: John McCain at February 27, 2014 03:35 PM (Q6pxP)
Fuck you, John. Ah, it still feels so good to say that.
Posted by: Insomniac at February 27, 2014 11:37 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: sven10077 at February 27, 2014 11:37 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: Kreplach at February 27, 2014 11:37 AM (sRsX7)
Posted by: Barack O'Stalin at February 27, 2014 11:37 AM (Q6pxP)
Posted by: Dr Spank at February 27, 2014 11:37 AM (hn70M)
Posted by: Augustus Caesar at February 27, 2014 11:37 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Peter Russo at February 27, 2014 11:37 AM (e8kgV)
--GOP
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at February 27, 2014 11:37 AM (9PrpA)
Here we are. The cat is out of the bag. And all are simply accepting that Obama and Holder can issue fiats or ignore laws as they see fit.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 11:37 AM (XUKZU)
The good news? As Monty likes to say DOOM is upon us and it will all be fixed when the great burning occurs. And we will finally get a flat tax.
The bad news? The new leader for life will be Lord Humongous and that flat tax will be 75% of your "income", your best looking duaghter, and all your gasoline.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 27, 2014 11:38 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Bill Ayers at February 27, 2014 11:38 AM (Q6pxP)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 11:39 AM (xZxMD)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 11:39 AM (tyz5J)
Posted by: jrcobbstr at February 27, 2014 11:40 AM (OGuBw)
Posted by: SMOD at February 27, 2014 11:40 AM (Q6pxP)
Posted by: HR at February 27, 2014 11:40 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies with whipped cream. at February 27, 2014 11:40 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Citizen X at February 27, 2014 11:40 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Augustus Caesar at February 27, 2014 03:37 PM (8ZskC)
So you're saying keep inviting Boner John to all the right parties?
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 11:40 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 27, 2014 11:40 AM (ZkzmI)
Posted by: Killerdog at February 27, 2014 11:40 AM (RfVfI)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:41 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: Mega, AoS Commenter of the Year at February 27, 2014 11:41 AM (hHFOx)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 11:41 AM (tyz5J)
Posted by: dirks strewn at February 27, 2014 11:42 AM (kfcYC)
Posted by: ejo at February 27, 2014 11:42 AM (GXvSO)
That is exactly what would have happened under the original convention.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 27, 2014 11:42 AM (T2V/1)
If a conservative Republican (heaven forfend) is elected to succeed Barack Obama, you may reliably assume that in January of 2017, with similar precision, dissent will once again become patriotic in between ticks of the atomic clock.
In like manner, the arrogant and unconstitutional expansion of executive power was A Very Bad Thing and a Slippery Slope To Fascism when it was occurring under Republicans. So said, among others, then-Senator Barack Obama.
Then, bang on the mark, as soon as Obama became President, the arrogant and unconstitutional expansion of executive power became A Regrettably Necessary Step Forced On A Reluctant President By Systematic Obstructionism In The Republican Congress.
I absolutely guaran-damn-tee you that if a conservative Republican is sworn in in 2017 and attempts to govern the way Obama has, then just like clockwork and just as with "dissent", the professional left will do an instant 180, and executive power will once again be deemed A Very Bad Thing and a Slippery Slope To Fascism.
Fen's Law sees all, knows all, explains all.
Posted by: torquewrench at February 27, 2014 11:42 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Common Core Rebels at February 27, 2014 11:42 AM (hFL/3)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:42 AM (olDqf)
Yes, it ends with a powerful America coming to the rescue.
oh
Posted by: Mega, AoS Commenter of the Year at February 27, 2014 11:42 AM (hHFOx)
Posted by: Elizabeth Warren at February 27, 2014 11:42 AM (Q6pxP)
Posted by: RWC at February 27, 2014 11:42 AM (MtC8f)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 11:43 AM (xZxMD)
Posted by: irright at February 27, 2014 11:44 AM (8GKDa)
That's just practical politics. The art of the possible. Making compromises with TFG and Harry Reid are in all our best interests. So what if they are lying sacks of shit that lie every time they open their mouths; we must work with them until we are in charge.
There's no other way. Patience, my friends.
(do I really need a sarc tag here?)
Posted by: GnuBreed at February 27, 2014 11:44 AM (cHZB7)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 27, 2014 11:44 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 27, 2014 11:44 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 11:44 AM (tyz5J)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:44 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: tubal at February 27, 2014 11:45 AM (dPgcc)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at February 27, 2014 11:45 AM (naUcP)
I find it amusing to compare Obama's latest stunt with one King George III of Great Britain. George III wasn't just unpopular with the Colonials living in America. He was also unpopular with his own Parliament for attempting to increase the power of the monarchy through various methods. One of those methods was to publicly announce that certain laws that the King didn't much like would not be enforced.
Sound familiar?
Posted by: junior at February 27, 2014 11:45 AM (UWFpX)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 11:45 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Citizen X at February 27, 2014 11:46 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Adolph at February 27, 2014 11:46 AM (Aif/5)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 27, 2014 11:46 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:47 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 27, 2014 11:47 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:48 AM (olDqf)
Little VIA is home sick today, so guess what we watched.
And I shared this original article with several people this morning.
Liberals included.
Nervous laughter when discussing the premise.
Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at February 27, 2014 11:48 AM (DPkKe)
Posted by: HR at February 27, 2014 11:48 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:49 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: sven10077 at February 27, 2014 11:49 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: Citizen X at February 27, 2014 11:49 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 27, 2014 11:49 AM (ZPrif)
International Business Times UK reporter Ludovica Iaccino may write for a living, but has she got the words to explain this?
Last week, Iaccino penned an article claiming that the anti-government protests in Ukraine were being led by an “unnamed” “former Israeli army officer. Here’s the kicker: Iaccino’s source for that juicy piece of information was PressTV, the Tehran-based Iranian news network.Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 11:49 AM (XUKZU)
Except anti-semitism really is sweeping across enlightened Western Europe again.
Posted by: Mega, AoS Commenter of the Year at February 27, 2014 11:49 AM (hHFOx)
What Republicans have done is mere window dressing only accomplished as a political act after all the poll reading, wind direction checking and electoral analysis has been done.
My issue of course is their reaction is not intuitive, primal or immediate. That's a dead giveaway it is calculated and most likely an ephemeral tactic designed only to protect themselves- not anyone they are meant to serve.
Posted by: Marcus T at February 27, 2014 11:50 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 27, 2014 11:50 AM (dfYL9)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 27, 2014 11:50 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: spongeworthy at February 27, 2014 11:50 AM (g3wv2)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at February 27, 2014 11:51 AM (HVff2)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 27, 2014 11:51 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:51 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: sound awake at February 27, 2014 11:52 AM (pk/NG)
I love their sauce when I eat fish.
Posted by: Joe Biden at February 27, 2014 11:52 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 11:52 AM (tyz5J)
Posted by: spongeworthy at February 27, 2014 11:52 AM (g3wv2)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:53 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: Adam at February 27, 2014 11:53 AM (Aif/5)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:53 AM (olDqf)
I think you answered your question with your parentheses.
Posted by: HR at February 27, 2014 11:53 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: SE Pa Moron [/i] at February 27, 2014 11:53 AM (CnA98)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 27, 2014 11:53 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 27, 2014 11:54 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: sven10077 at February 27, 2014 11:54 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: spongeworthy at February 27, 2014 03:52 PM (g3wv2)
Someone posted this morning that McConehead has already said if Republicans take the Senate they will go back to the 60 vote cloture rule!
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 27, 2014 11:54 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Fritz at February 27, 2014 11:55 AM (UzPAd)
Posted by: palerider at February 27, 2014 11:55 AM (dkExz)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:55 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: tubal at February 27, 2014 11:55 AM (OYe5i)
I may have read about it somewhere:
http://minx.cc/?post=346835
Posted by: HR at February 27, 2014 11:55 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 27, 2014 11:56 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 27, 2014 11:56 AM (dfYL9)
F**k Turley. He is part and parcel of the degradation of the system going back years. Viewed more seriously, the current "tipping point" is a difference of degree, not kind, from the lawless post-constitutional decline going on for years. Of which he has been a typical mindless cheerleader.
And why should the judiciary "care"? While of course not true without exception, the judiciary (the part that deals with constitutional matters, not criminal or admiralty or traffic court) is arguably the most lawless branch of all. Once their perilous unconstitutional role as unaccountable final arbiter was cemented by inertia and practice, it was just a matter of time.
One could say it actually required the decline of a serious legislative branch to reach this point, as the constitution did include safeguards for the accountable branch to rein in a rogue judiciary, they simply haven't been much used.
Posted by: non-purist at February 27, 2014 11:56 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 11:56 AM (tyz5J)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:57 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: Kreplach at February 27, 2014 11:57 AM (uXvLX)
Posted by: Lars Kasch at February 27, 2014 11:57 AM (DAevm)
Posted by: kbdabear at February 27, 2014 11:58 AM (aTXUx)
Posted by: gm at February 27, 2014 11:58 AM (/kBoL)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 27, 2014 11:58 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 27, 2014 11:58 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 11:58 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 11:59 AM (tyz5J)
SS et al would be phased out over a 10 year period.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 27, 2014 11:59 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 27, 2014 11:59 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: jwest at February 27, 2014 12:00 PM (u2a4R)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 12:00 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 12:00 PM (olDqf)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 27, 2014 12:00 PM (t3UFN)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 12:01 PM (olDqf)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at February 27, 2014 12:01 PM (1hM1d)
alex, in all seriousness, and ready for the mockery it might invite, that's not my test, at all. Mine is: is an expansion of power absolutely needed for the public interest, including the calculus that foregoing the expanded power poses greater risks than adopting the expanded power. And all of that has to - has to - fit within the plain meaning (only meaning) of the constitution. The thing can be amended if need be.
So it's not about how I view such expanded power from my perspective, at all. It's not about me - nothing is. And these things aren't engineering calculations, it's lots of gray area. But feeling uncomfortable that Joe Biden vs. Scott Walker might have a power doesn't even occur to me.
Posted by: non-purist at February 27, 2014 12:01 PM (afQnV)
Posted by: Lincolntf
Yes, from a weird blog called Space of Ades or something like that.
Posted by: weft cut-loop[/i] [/b] at February 27, 2014 12:01 PM (XKKNz)
Posted by: soothie at February 27, 2014 12:02 PM (tyz5J)
Would you please quit holding it in. Keeping these things to yourself is not good.
Please tell us how you really feel, it will feel good to let it out.
Posted by: GMB who was the soldier sitting next to her. at February 27, 2014 12:02 PM (nkPV9)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at February 27, 2014 12:02 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 27, 2014 12:02 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: SE Pa Moron [/i] at February 27, 2014 12:02 PM (CnA98)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 12:02 PM (olDqf)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 27, 2014 12:03 PM (ZshNr)
Posted by: jwest at February 27, 2014 12:03 PM (u2a4R)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at February 27, 2014 12:03 PM (9Bdcz)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 12:03 PM (olDqf)
but when a progressive president begins asserting he has the right to rewrite the laws by his own personal whim, they just don't notice.
They notice. Because it's part of the plan.
As long as Reid controls the Senate, Obama will act with impunity.
Posted by: --- at February 27, 2014 12:04 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 12:04 PM (bb5+k)
Yes, because this both a smart military blog and a smart French blog.
Verstehen?
Posted by: GnuBreed at February 27, 2014 12:04 PM (cHZB7)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at February 27, 2014 12:04 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: concrete girl at February 27, 2014 12:05 PM (o4L+R)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 12:05 PM (bb5+k)
I'm massively pro-nuke.
But Moore is just a hack and a shill spouting opinions for money.
NO ONE who has ever had anything to do with Greenpeace at any stage of its existence should be considered intellectually substantive or ethically reliable.
Let's remember how Greenpeace came into existence. It was originally called The Committee To Stop The Wave, or Don't Make A Wave, or several variants thereupon. (Not a very organized bunch.)
Uh, what wave? A metaphorical wave of ecological decline?
No. A real wave. This was when the Nixon administration was proposing to conduct a short below-ground nuclear weapons test series in the Aleutians, at Amchitka. (If you look in the encyclopedia under "inhospitably barren howling waste in the middle of nowhere," it has a picture of Amchitka.)
The Stop The Wave (soon to be "Greenpeace") bunch averred that if the largest shot in the Amchitka series were to go off, it would trigger the biggest tsunami in history, twenty stories tall, which would sweep southeast out of the Aleuts and completely destroy the entire western seaboard from Valdez to Baja, scouring everything clean down to the bedrock. THAT was the "wave" they were worked up about.
The Amchitka shots went off on schedule. Nary a ripple was noted. But the ignorant, hysterical fuckwits behind the protest are still with us. Including Moore, who was just as taken in by the completely irrational and unscientific monster-wave nonsense as the rest of them were. Remember that when you hear him testify as a hired gun. He needs to vanish from public life. All of them do.
Posted by: torquewrench at February 27, 2014 12:05 PM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 27, 2014 12:05 PM (t3UFN)
“First lady Michelle Obama — whose staff was key in getting the proposal out of FDA, where the labeling revamp has been in the works for 10 years — is slated to announce the changes at a Let’s Move! anniversary event at the White House with HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg”
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 12:06 PM (XUKZU)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 12:06 PM (xZxMD)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 12:06 PM (olDqf)
but has anyone ever heard of the "quenelle" before?
Before last month, no. HR has the link. It's hard to keep up with all the world's hate. You get some info on a smart military blog, other in other reading, but usually things have to come to a bloody head before we pay attention to it from across one or the other pond.
An earlier thread was about how you can't directly compare American political positions to those in other systems. From a European perspective, we're all centrists. In Italy there are sizeable minorities who self-identify as communists and fascists. It's not crypto-anything and it's not the insult that one side flings at the other.
In Germany you can't have an honest discussion of the rise of Nazism because, among other things, some books like "Mein Kampf" are banned. England doesn't have a First Amendment. As boned as we are, we're not Europe.
Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at February 27, 2014 12:07 PM (A0sHn)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at February 27, 2014 12:07 PM (R8hU8)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at February 27, 2014 12:07 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: Realist, Man. I'm a REALIST! at February 27, 2014 12:07 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at February 27, 2014 12:07 PM (naUcP)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 12:07 PM (olDqf)
Posted by: tubal at February 27, 2014 12:07 PM (GLv5I)
Posted by: Monsieur McCain at February 27, 2014 12:07 PM (aTXUx)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 12:08 PM (bb5+k)
I don't grok the metaphor. He wasn't malicious, or seeking to destroy. He was just naive.
Posted by: HR at February 27, 2014 12:08 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 12:08 PM (olDqf)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 12:09 PM (xZxMD)
That said, I think I've finally figured out why the Republicans seem to be so feckless in dealing with Obama. Obama simply cannot fail. If a single liberal in congress were to ever even appear to be the least bit reticent or resistant to anything Obama is doing or proposes to do, the entire party would be exposed to the taint of "potentially racist leanings.'
That is precisely the reason why Republicans are gun shy about openly challenging Obama more strenuously. Right now, thanks to years of newspeak from the left, the whole of the right already carries that taint, and it works nearly perfectly for the left. And it's not only racism - the war on women, freedom of choice, wanting old people and children to die, and fiscal concepts whereby slowed growth in spending is considered draconian cuts - all that BS...
Republicans cannot win this and Democrats will not allow themselves to share the taint of newspeak "Racism". That taint cannot be allowed to fall from the right, or even be perceived to be shared by the left.
Game over.
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at February 27, 2014 12:09 PM (BZAd3)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 12:09 PM (olDqf)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at February 27, 2014 12:10 PM (9Bdcz)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 03:32 PM (XUKZU)
Experts at what?
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 27, 2014 12:10 PM (FQEMb)
Posted by: Citizen X at February 27, 2014 12:10 PM (7ObY1)
Here's a question:
Is there any national personality who has been more right on principle and tactics than Mark Levin.
That guy is fucking fantastic.
Posted by: prescient11 at February 27, 2014 12:10 PM (tVTLU)
This is not your father's Fascism...
This is a new and improved Fascism...with the threat of being labeled 'racist' if you speak up about it.
Posted by: wheatie at February 27, 2014 12:10 PM (QsHQT)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 03:58 PM (olDqf)
It's a serious subject.
Posted by: Hank's Johnson at February 27, 2014 12:10 PM (kVfSG)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 12:11 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 27, 2014 12:11 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Monsieur McCain at February 27, 2014 04:07 PM (aTXUx)
Fous toi, Jean!
Posted by: Insomniac at February 27, 2014 12:11 PM (DrWcr)
In exchange for getting to keep my entire paycheck instead of having it siphoned out to fund subsidies for other people's families? Otherwise, GFY.
Posted by: HR at February 27, 2014 12:11 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Citizen X at February 27, 2014 12:12 PM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition at February 27, 2014 12:12 PM (R8hU8)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 12:12 PM (olDqf)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 12:12 PM (olDqf)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 12:13 PM (bb5+k)
Sh*t, they've already done it. We're already backwards idiots and they're smart.
Posted by: Mega, AoS Commenter of the Year at February 27, 2014 12:13 PM (hHFOx)
Yeah. In the old days if you spoke out, you got dragged into an alley and beaten to a pulp.
We're bringing back the good old days.
Posted by: New Black Panther Party at February 27, 2014 12:13 PM (DrWcr)
And the guy who said that, is damned smart, scientist ego I suppose but it depresses me that a generally smart person would not realize that NO it is cutting red tape and stimulating the economy which could increase funding for science and tech not that funding tech instead of welfare and (these are liberals) 'warfare' can grow an economy.
Posted by: palerider at February 27, 2014 12:13 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies with whipped cream. at February 27, 2014 12:14 PM (VtjlW)
testifying as experts in front of congress yesterday. Priorities, man,
priorities.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 03:32 PM (XUKZU)
Experts at what?
-
Affleck on the Congo and Rogen on Alzheimers.
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 12:14 PM (XUKZU)
Our only hope to get some ground back is the Senate this year. After that, turtles all the way down, I guess, until we speak either Russian or Chinese. As Joey would say, this election could be a bfd.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Judge of Raciss Morons at February 27, 2014 12:14 PM (baL2B)
Maybe your Dem senator should have asked Harry Reid to take some time off from buggering young boys to pass a budget.
Posted by: HR at February 27, 2014 12:15 PM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: SE Pa Moron [/i] at February 27, 2014 12:15 PM (CnA98)
Posted by: tubal at February 27, 2014 12:15 PM (GLv5I)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 27, 2014 12:16 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 12:16 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Citizen X at February 27, 2014 12:16 PM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Adam at February 27, 2014 12:16 PM (Aif/5)
------
Rogan-Alzheimer's
Affleck- Congo
No I'm not joking.
Posted by: Adam at February 27, 2014 04:16 PM (Aif/5)
If you'd said smoking weed, I would have believed it more readily.
Posted by: Insomniac at February 27, 2014 12:17 PM (DrWcr)
Nah, at least half of the R's are full-on progs. Most of the rest are what we'd would consider "D's of yesteryear" (at best). It's no more complicated than that and it's all you need to know.
Posted by: Mega, AoS Commenter of the Year at February 27, 2014 12:17 PM (hHFOx)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 12:18 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: palerider at February 27, 2014 12:19 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: Adam at February 27, 2014 12:19 PM (Aif/5)
Posted by: Roy at February 27, 2014 12:20 PM (VndSC)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD. Mmmm. Blondies with whipped cream. at February 27, 2014 12:20 PM (VtjlW)
Posted by: jwest at February 27, 2014 12:20 PM (u2a4R)
Posted by: the Butcher at February 27, 2014 12:21 PM (++HCY)
Sure am glad that congress has got all our national problems taken care of so they have time for that shit.
Posted by: lowandslow at February 27, 2014 12:21 PM (IV4od)
The judiciary of the federal government is the "last word" on judging the limits of the federal government's authority.
Nothing circular about that, at all! < /sarc >
I'm baffled that so few people have a problem with this.
Posted by: goy at February 27, 2014 12:21 PM (oGez1)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 12:21 PM (xZxMD)
Posted by: jwest at February 27, 2014 04:20 PM (u2a4R)
He is risen! Hallelujah!
Posted by: Jesse Jackson at February 27, 2014 12:21 PM (DrWcr)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 27, 2014 12:21 PM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Anon at February 27, 2014 12:22 PM (PQ3tU)
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at February 27, 2014 12:23 PM (kxSZr)
Posted by: tubal at February 27, 2014 12:23 PM (pm/oS)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 27, 2014 12:23 PM (dfYL9)
Posted by: jrcobbstr at February 27, 2014 12:23 PM (OGuBw)
Margarita/Goy:
If I may intervene, the 2d Am is the "last word" on judging the limits of the federal government's authority.
LOL
Posted by: prescient11 at February 27, 2014 12:25 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 27, 2014 12:25 PM (bb5+k)
Slightly on-topic -- why Giggles? Where did that nickname for Shit Midas come from? What wildly inappropriate situation did he laugh about?
Posted by: acethepug at February 27, 2014 12:26 PM (F8WDc)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 27, 2014 12:26 PM (olDqf)
Posted by: Carol at February 27, 2014 12:26 PM (5M5r7)
-----------
Oh, they used to care.
We took care of that.
Posted by: NSA at February 27, 2014 12:27 PM (VjL9S)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 27, 2014 12:27 PM (SY2Kh)
=====
Yahoo news headline this morning: "World Temperatures in January 4th highest on record!!!11!!!!1!!"
That Polar Vortex thingy was just a local news story here. And shut up.
Posted by: Biff Boffo at February 27, 2014 12:27 PM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: tubal at February 27, 2014 12:27 PM (pm/oS)
"Experts at what?"
Shit, does it matter?
The Democrats in Congress, during the big scare over Alar in apples, brought in for public testimony before the committee, the noted epidemiological and toxicological authority Dr. Meryl Streep, M.D., Ph.D.
Part of the reason that Hollyweird adore the Democrats is that Democrats cuddle and cosset the Hollyweirders in their belief that they -- vapid and empty-headed entertainers who don't know shit about anything outside of showbiz -- are secretly Very Smart People who could Succeed At Anything They Turned Their Hands To.
Normally these supergenius celebrities just, y'know, hide their light under a bushel to prevent dazzling the rest of us with their laser brilliance. Because the rest of us would feel pokey and stupid by comparison to them if they were always out in the open with it, and it would give us a sad. And they don't want to give us a sad. They're good that way.
Posted by: torquewrench at February 27, 2014 12:28 PM (gqT4g)
Affleck- Congo
No I'm not joking.
Posted by: Adam at February 27, 2014 04:16 PM (Aif/5)
You can't make shit like this up. Did Jon Leibowitz ridicule those two dickholes being considered "experts" on those topics where there are real scientists and academics whose jobs it is to know a shitton of info on those topics. Not to mention State Dept employees, even under Reporting for Doody, who should be totes up to speed on Congo?
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 27, 2014 12:28 PM (FQEMb)
Is ... is it possible Obama WANTS Civil War? That he is pushing and pushing because he desperately thinks he can win an insurrection?
His entire administration has been setting the table of the 'radical right-wing terrorist/tea party/veteran racist insurgency.' He'll go as radical as he wants, and if anything happens, he knows that the media will helpfully propagandize things his way.
Posted by: --- at February 27, 2014 12:29 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: ScoggDog at February 27, 2014 12:29 PM (F2BKh)
From your mouth to God's ears.
Posted by: torquewrench at February 27, 2014 12:30 PM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 27, 2014 12:31 PM (dfYL9)
Posted by: tubal at February 27, 2014 12:31 PM (pm/oS)
Posted by: Vic at February 27, 2014 03:54 PM (T2V/1)
It is commentary such as this that makes me want to beat the fuck out of him.
====
It also makes me wonder why some on our side are so against primarying him. Is Bevin that much of a "RWNJ"?
Posted by: Biff Boffo at February 27, 2014 12:31 PM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: SE Pa Moron [/i] at February 27, 2014 12:32 PM (CnA98)
While this may have been the intent, and may in fact be true in theory, from a practical standpoint there's been no evidence of this since 1791. In fact, there's been just the opposite.
Posted by: goy at February 27, 2014 12:33 PM (oGez1)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 12:33 PM (xZxMD)
Looks to me ... Louisville native ... that Bevins is a sure loser in a general against Grimes.
But here's the kicker, McConnell's chances ain't good either.
Posted by: ScoggDog at February 27, 2014 12:34 PM (F2BKh)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 27, 2014 12:34 PM (xZxMD)
Goy, well I would refer you to the civil war! Now the federal govt won that dispute, but I'd say some rifles on the other side put up a pretty good fight.
Posted by: prescient11 at February 27, 2014 12:34 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: sven10077 at February 27, 2014 12:34 PM (pUwoD)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 27, 2014 12:36 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: tubal at February 27, 2014 12:36 PM (sCfLS)
Posted by: sven10077 at February 27, 2014 12:37 PM (pUwoD)
If I may intervene, the 2d Am is the "last word" on judging the limits of the federal government's authority.
LOL
Posted by: prescient11 at February 27, 2014 04:25 PM (tVTLU)
--------------------
Yes, it is.
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 27, 2014 04:31 PM (dfYL9)
Ballot Box. Soap Box. Cartridge Box.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 27, 2014 12:37 PM (TIIx5)
Posted by: Titanium at February 27, 2014 12:37 PM (JLKJJ)
I think what put a lot of people off of Bevin that the Tea Party voters want, more than anything else, someone who isn't going to campaign saying one thing, and then in office conduct themselves entirely differently.
So getting caught talking up TARP as good? Not good.
Especially since -- let's remember our history -- TARP was what sparked the comments from Rick Santelli that led to the original Tea Party demonstrations.
It's a shame. It would be great to see Mitch get thrown in the ditch. But Bevin may not have been the best choice for the challenge.
Posted by: torquewrench at February 27, 2014 12:38 PM (gqT4g)
Which should demonstrate that the 2A isn't enough, in and of itself, to impose any limit on the federal government's constant, extra-constitutional expansion of authority.
Posted by: goy at February 27, 2014 12:39 PM (oGez1)
What is this insanity of adversion w/ TARP. All of it has been paid back by financial institutions that received it, or pretty much all of it.
It could have been handled differently, but at times of bank runs one institution needs to stabilize.
Posted by: prescient11 at February 27, 2014 12:40 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: jrcobbstr at February 27, 2014 12:42 PM (OGuBw)
Posted by: Jean at February 27, 2014 12:42 PM (4JkHl)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at February 27, 2014 12:43 PM (5xmd7)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at February 27, 2014 12:45 PM (5xmd7)
Posted by: panzernashorn at February 27, 2014 12:51 PM (MhA4j)
The idiots we put on the Supreme Court do this crap all the time. Did they really think that we eventually wouldn't get someone just as lacking in character and self-restraint as they are in the presidency? How could they claim to not know what Obama is when he publicly bullied them and savaged them as his first order of business?
Posted by: Thatch at February 27, 2014 12:55 PM (qYvEa)
Posted by: NYC Parent at February 27, 2014 01:03 PM (HEo6y)
Posted by: jrcobbstr at February 27, 2014 01:11 PM (OGuBw)
Posted by: whoever at February 27, 2014 01:15 PM (kGSN0)
The kind who talks about how great the good ole USA is while voting for it's killers.
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at February 27, 2014 01:17 PM (DL2i+)
And this actually worked reasonably well...
...right up until the federal government granted itself the authority - in direct violation of the Constitution's definition of Treason - to wage war on the States and their citizens, which are the sole grantors of all the limited authority the federal government has.
In our diseducated society, however, we're not allowed to talk about this because... SHUT UP!!! SLAVERY!!!
The federal government has existed pretty much solely to expand its authority for over 150 years. Both "parties" are a party to this overreach. Electing the "right" politicians to federal office isn't going to change that. And the ones who try to point out the obvious are relentlessly demonized (like Cruz, Rand, et. al.).
The only constitutional path to fixing this is for the States to re-boot the federal government THEY created, replacing the corrupt actors that infest it, and using all that has been learned over the past 150 years to prevent similar future abuses.
http://bit.ly/1fn7GCD
Posted by: goy at February 27, 2014 01:24 PM (oGez1)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at February 27, 2014 02:36 PM (5xmd7)
Posted by: havildar - major at February 27, 2014 02:56 PM (kduZC)
Was this "diary" a Harry Turtledove novel?
Posted by: goy at February 27, 2014 05:34 PM (oGez1)
The United States is NOT mentioned in the Bible. We do not even know if it survives. At the present time, its chances are NOT good.
Posted by: burt at February 28, 2014 07:10 AM (1+kJ5)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.208 seconds, 404 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Y-not at February 27, 2014 11:29 AM (zDsvJ)