January 13, 2014
— Ace Baffling.
“I don’t think the tea party is going to seize upon Fort Lee and the George Washington Bridge as their defining difference for Chris Christie,” Rove said. “In fact, I think his handling of this, being straightforward, taking action, saying I’m responsible, firing the people, probably gives him some street cred with tea party Republicans who say ‘That’s what we want in a leader, someone who steps up and takes responsibility.’”
I'm not sure if Rove has completely put aside his Analysis role for an Advocate one, and so comes on TV to push his favorite center-leaning candidate, no matter how wrong the spin.
Or if he is this disconnected from the pulse of politics.
The plural of "anecdote" may not be data, but based on my own daily informal survey of where the passion in the conservative wing of the conservative movement is, it remains strongly anti-Christie.
One thing Rove says here is true: that BridgeGate will not define Christie in the Tea Party's eyes. But that's because Christie is already over-defined in the eyes of many Tea Partiers. As I see every day: "Northeastern centrist-liberal RINO," "Gun-grabber," "amnesty-shill," "Islamist judge appointer," "extremely selfish political operator who constantly subverts the movement to advance himself" (see his 2012 RNC speech in which he fulsomely endorsed... nothing).
If there was even any grudging respect for Christie after the press conference, I didn't see it.
BTW, I think people are wrong to rule out Christie categorically. Sometimes the only good option is one you don't particularly like. I could see, for example, a scenario in which conservatism continues to be unpopular at the national level, and Christie (or a similar RINO) might be our only plausible vehicle for winning the White House.
Not saying that will be the case. I'm saying it could be that way. And in that case, a Christie nomination might be our least bad option, with our worst bad option being "run a symbolic candidate who will be doomed on Election Day and curse the nation into another four years of grueling political and economic hell."
But none of that suggests that Christie gained any "street cred" with Tea Partiers. All I see is BridgeGate getting incorporated into the already-substantial list of Christie's disqualifications, with the added bonus of a fresh source of resentment: the feeling that many on the disaffected right have that a non-RINO conservative would be crucified and left for dead by the Establishment over a Christie level blunder, while the Establishment works overtime to keep the RINO viable.
But note that while the Republican Establishment may be trying to resuscitate Christie, your Progressive Media most decidedly is not.
But maybe he's right and I'm wrong: Were any of you who self-identify as Tea Partiers partly won over by Christie's press conference?
Posted by: Ace at
08:05 AM
| Comments (467)
Post contains 496 words, total size 3 kb.
Posted by: Roy at January 13, 2014 08:07 AM (VndSC)
The treatment of Christie should send a warning to everyone in the GOP. This is straight out of the Democrats playbook; destroy the potential presidential candidates with fallacious attacks, seemingly damaging statements and words that resonate with “low-information” voters like “impeachment” no matter how ridiculous.
Christie has been a useful idiot for Democrats. But now that he has been mentioned as a potential presidential candidate- he is the enemy. Something he may want to remember.
By the way, remember how Democrats have treated anyone that dares to utter the “word” impeachment” against Mr. Obama as “crazy” or “extremist”. There is a lesson in that for the GOP. Impeachment for Christie over this? What a bunch of crazy Democrat extremists…
That is separate and distinct between whether I support Christie as a Republican candidate, which by the way is not influenced in any way by what Rove says (what the hell is he talking about anyway?). I still donÂ’t.
But that doesnÂ’t mean I support the character assassination. Because tomorrow it will be applied to someone else. And it could very well be someone I do like.
This should be nipped in the bud and stated for what it is by everyone in the GOP. More of the same from Democrats who have done nothing but divide and destroy our country with their hysterical, ungrounded, extremist language in an attempt to further fool the voters of our country.
They disgust me.
Posted by: Marcus at January 13, 2014 08:07 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/i][/u][/b] at January 13, 2014 08:08 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/b] [/s] at January 13, 2014 08:08 AM (HsTG8)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at January 13, 2014 08:08 AM (g4TxM)
Posted by: Mega at January 13, 2014 08:08 AM (hHFOx)
Posted by: Roy at January 13, 2014 08:10 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: Rarl Kove at January 13, 2014 08:10 AM (iEoiA)
Besides pissing off the teachers unions (and for that I give him full kudos), Christie's not done a damn thing that differentiates him from a fucking Democrat.
I realize that Karl Rove is a senile old fossil who still thinks it's still 1996, but FGS, man; wake up!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/i][/u][/b] at January 13, 2014 08:10 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 13, 2014 08:10 AM (XZ8Vh)
Posted by: Mega at January 13, 2014 08:10 AM (hHFOx)
Posted by: Countrysquire at January 13, 2014 08:10 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: Secundus at January 13, 2014 08:11 AM (FkSC4)
I could see, for example, a scenario in which conservatism continues to be unpopular at the national level, and Christie (or a similar RINO) might be our only plausible vehicle for winning the White House.
------------
Here's the thing...if I'm a conservative, and Christie is not, how is he "our" candidate?
He isn't mine, and I really don't see a situation where he ever will be.
Posted by: @JohnTant at January 13, 2014 08:11 AM (PFy0L)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 13, 2014 08:11 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: Countrysquire at January 13, 2014 08:11 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: HR at January 13, 2014 08:12 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: sven10077 at January 13, 2014 08:12 AM (TE35l)
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha (pause) Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
No.
Posted by: mrp at January 13, 2014 08:12 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at January 13, 2014 08:12 AM (g4TxM)
Posted by: Roy at January 13, 2014 08:12 AM (VndSC)
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
'cause he loves him some spotlight, but you know that.
Posted by: Countrysquire at January 13, 2014 12:10 PM (LSJmV)
He's Client 9 who obsesses on food instead of strange.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 13, 2014 08:12 AM (XZ8Vh)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 13, 2014 08:12 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: Countrysquire at January 13, 2014 12:10 PM (LSJmV)
The spotlight needed to fully illuminate Chris Krispy was so large that when he passed in front of it, NASA was getting reports of a solar eclipse.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/i][/u][/b] at January 13, 2014 08:12 AM (4df7R)
I thought TEA meant Taxed Enough Already. I'm down with that and have been since Rick Santelli gave his epic rant about taxpayers bailing out idiots who bought houses they couldn't afford. I've been down since the beginning with total opposition to the enactment of Obamacare and attempts to repeal it.
But I must have missed the meeting when these became Tea Party issues:
-- Gun control in the states
-- "Amnesty"
-- Appointing judges who happen to be Muslim to a state court
Posted by: rockmom at January 13, 2014 08:13 AM (NYnoe)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at January 13, 2014 08:13 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Thunderb at January 13, 2014 08:13 AM (zOTsN)
I'm sure Christie is wondering why Obama hasn't hugged him in public for a nice photo-op. I'm sure Christie has his official governor's fleece with him 24/7 just in case an impromtu photo-op arises.
Sadly - for Christie that is - he'll find no aid or comfort from Obama or the MSM who wrote nice things about Christie when Christie was nice to Obama.
Funny how that works, isn't it, Gov. Christie?
Posted by: MacGruber at January 13, 2014 08:13 AM (XxAYS)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at January 13, 2014 08:13 AM (g4TxM)
Posted by: DangerGirl at January 13, 2014 08:13 AM (EYfcP)
Posted by: Hip Guy Who Is Totally "With It", Cat at January 13, 2014 08:13 AM (hHFOx)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at January 13, 2014 08:13 AM (U1Tts)
Posted by: toby928© beating memes to death since 2006 at January 13, 2014 08:13 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Nancy at January 13, 2014 08:14 AM (N8Zq9)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at January 13, 2014 08:14 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)-also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at January 13, 2014 08:14 AM (659DL)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at January 13, 2014 08:15 AM (5xmd7)
Posted by: DangerGirl at January 13, 2014 08:15 AM (EYfcP)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at January 13, 2014 08:15 AM (U1Tts)
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 13, 2014 08:16 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 13, 2014 08:16 AM (CRyse)
And no, I wasn't impressed with Christie's press conference. I hope he doesn't come within 100 miles of the GOP nomination. He will be crucified by the press and the GOP will have to wait until 2020. And I cannot stand to even think about a Hillary! presidential term.
I can only hope Christie's presidential ambitions are scuttled.
Posted by: MacGruber at January 13, 2014 08:16 AM (XxAYS)
Posted by: Thunderb at January 13, 2014 08:16 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Jeanne of the North at January 13, 2014 08:16 AM (GdalM)
Posted by: mrp at January 13, 2014 08:16 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: backhoe at January 13, 2014 08:16 AM (ULH4o)
Posted by: John McCain at January 13, 2014 08:16 AM (Pt5Ms)
You mean like Dole, McCain and Romney? What's hard to see about that?
Posted by: Cindy Munford at January 13, 2014 08:16 AM (6MiMG)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, still chilly at January 13, 2014 08:17 AM (naUcP)
Posted by: sven10077 at January 13, 2014 08:17 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: Thunderb at January 13, 2014 08:18 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at January 13, 2014 08:18 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: akula51[/b][/i][/s] at January 13, 2014 08:18 AM (ZcS8q)
No.
Posted by: Reginold B. Comms at January 13, 2014 08:19 AM (VKFIn)
Yeah, cause we're all about punishing our political enemies by hurting the everyday people, and doing so by abusing the power of our elected office
FIFY. Like I want this jagoff in a position to misuse the IR-fucking-S.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/i][/u][/b] at January 13, 2014 08:19 AM (4df7R)
Feel free to quote me....
Posted by: backhoe at January 13, 2014 12:16 PM (ULH4o)
Rove is a braying jackass.
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at January 13, 2014 08:19 AM (BZAd3)
Posted by: Mega at January 13, 2014 08:19 AM (hHFOx)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 13, 2014 08:19 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: alexthechick - Come to us, oh mighty SMOD at January 13, 2014 08:19 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Countrysquire at January 13, 2014 08:19 AM (LSJmV)
But that performance made me think, eh...it could work if it had to...sort of in a Newt Gingrich way, I'd be happy to see him be a tough guy to the press.
Posted by: JeremiadBullfrog at January 13, 2014 08:19 AM (RGj+7)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at January 13, 2014 08:19 AM (5xmd7)
Posted by: Paid for by Citizens for Clyde the Orangutan at January 13, 2014 08:19 AM (QF8uk)
Posted by: sven10077 at January 13, 2014 08:20 AM (TE35l)
I think they're going to need a bigger spotlight.
Posted by: iNC Ref at January 13, 2014 08:20 AM (m7mrm)
That fat fucker!!!
It is the immigration policy that will sink the mutt.
Nobody gives a rats ass about abridge closing..
That mutt is great at diverting the facts..
Posted by: clubber Lang at January 13, 2014 08:20 AM (aNW9+)
Posted by: AmericanGypsea at January 13, 2014 08:20 AM (PY5T+)
Posted by: seems legit at January 13, 2014 08:21 AM (A98Xu)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at January 13, 2014 08:21 AM (5xmd7)
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at January 13, 2014 08:21 AM (BZAd3)
Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at January 13, 2014 08:21 AM (9+ccr)
Posted by: Thunderb at January 13, 2014 08:21 AM (zOTsN)
Oh? how about Hillary is the Prog candidate, and Christie is the Retard candidate.
Are you going to sit home, or go out and vote for the lesser of two weasels? if you do sit at home, then don't bitch too loudly when Hillary gets busy continuing the policies of Emperor Teh Won teh First.
-------------
Sorry, I'm finished with being blackmailed into voting for a RINO because the alternative is JUST TOO BAD TO CONTEMPLATE.
If a candidate can't earn my vote on his own merits, he sure as shit stinks won't earn a default vote. I played the GOP "lesser of two evils" game for the last time with Romney and the so-called "electible" candidates. Never Again.
Not voting is just as valid a choice as voting, and yes I get to bitch very loud when the leadership choices I'm presented are Dumb and Dumberer.
Posted by: @JohnTant at January 13, 2014 08:21 AM (PFy0L)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at January 13, 2014 12:17 PM (TIIx5)
Yeah I'm still trying to square "I fired this person" with "I'm still trying to figure out just what happened"; when you spend two fucking hours pontificating you're bound to create logical loggerheads like that. But, again, it's the type of dogshit I'd expect from a former federal prosecutor who is used to dropping the full weight of the feds on any poor sucker who gets in his crosshairs.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 13, 2014 08:22 AM (XZ8Vh)
Posted by: nightwitch at January 13, 2014 08:22 AM (Oq+xx)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at January 13, 2014 08:22 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: toby928© beating memes to death since 2006 at January 13, 2014 08:22 AM (QupBk)
Fallacious? Why is Christie firing people then?
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at January 13, 2014 12:19 PM (5xmd7)
Because they were stupid enough to use their real names on their emails.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/i][/u][/b] at January 13, 2014 08:22 AM (4df7R)
Rove misunderstands completely. He is never a conservative's candidate. Not in the least.
But he can count on us to get in there and get bloody with these fuckers. Because now the left is out for his head, and he may not be our guy in agreeance on some significant issues, but he is a member of the GOP and fuck you lefties and fuck you media. A bridge delay, fuck you right in your anal fucking cavity. Now if there are more serious issues, those will have to be reviewed.
But for a bridge delay, they can suck a dick. I will gladly stand behind Christie and laugh all day at the so-called media.
Estab. GOP, talking heads of the so-called GOP, we will see where they shake out. 1/2 will back, 1/2 will criticize, imho.
Conservatives need to take the high road. Conservatives need to come out swinging against the left in defense of Christie. Despite the fact that estab. fucks over candidates they don't like, we can be, and are, MUCH BIGGER than them. We run the fucking party. They're just our bankers...
You take back control by always being dependable and forging alliances and fighting for people when no one else seems to want to step up.
Posted by: prescient11 at January 13, 2014 08:22 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Valerie J at January 13, 2014 08:22 AM (WuGBT)
Posted by: M. Murcek at January 13, 2014 08:23 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: Blacksheep at January 13, 2014 08:23 AM (8/DeP)
But maybe he's right and I'm wrong: Were any of you who self-identify as Tea Partiers partly won over by Christie's press conference?
No. In fact, hell no.
Here's the sticking point for me - Christie had the perfect moment handed to him on a silver platter. He could have shredded the MFM live, all across the country, calling them out on their partisan bullshit. But he whiffed.
I know you think I'm a broken record on this, Ace, and you called me on it during Romney's debates, but I'm going to repeat it - the mainstream media is an unelected, yet willing, propaganda arm of the Democrat party. We cannot expect a fair shake from them. We cannot expect honest reporting - you yourself prove this every time you dissect them, as you did with WaPo's Barkycare garbage.
A Tea Party candidate, or one who wants the TP backing, has to get in the media's face. They also have to commandeer social media. They have to do their best to push back. If you begin by accepting their premises - "Governor, your aides closed the bridge. What did you know and when did you know it?" - then you've lost the fight.
Or am I in the minority here, wanting a fight that won't happen and would be more damaging than helpful?
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at January 13, 2014 08:23 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: toby928© beating memes to death since 2006 at January 13, 2014 08:23 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 13, 2014 08:23 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at January 13, 2014 08:23 AM (32Ze2)
Posted by: DangerGirl at January 13, 2014 08:24 AM (EYfcP)
Posted by: mrp at January 13, 2014 08:24 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: votermom at January 13, 2014 08:24 AM (GSIDW)
Posted by: sven10077 at January 13, 2014 08:24 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: Yessiree at January 13, 2014 08:24 AM (fqXPm)
Posted by: Realwest at January 13, 2014 08:24 AM (30LIS)
Posted by: Thunderb at January 13, 2014 08:24 AM (zOTsN)
Despite what everyone says, there is a middle ground in this country and it is a middle ground that is socially realistic and fiscally conservative (Libertarian).
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at January 13, 2014 08:25 AM (BZAd3)
Posted by: ontherocks at January 13, 2014 08:25 AM (7JjG+)
Um, that would be a big no-four, Mr. Rove.
In fact, what the "Fat And Furious" scandal reminds me of more than anything else is the incredibly tiresome schtick that we've now been subjected to for five-plus years from the Narcissist In Chief. Who never ever admits responsibility for problems even when it's crystal clear that he's directly responsible for them.
Right down to the tired repetition of the mantra, "No one is more outraged about [this completely predictable consequence of my policies] than I am, and I promise to get to the bottom of it."
So, another potential President who would govern in that same way as Obama has? DO NOT WANT.
Posted by: torquewrench at January 13, 2014 08:25 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at January 13, 2014 08:25 AM (9+ccr)
Democrat and RINO support are limited to large urban areas. These urban areas are mostly a blight. That people can't put 2 and 2 together is frustrating to say the least.
Posted by: polynikes at January 13, 2014 08:26 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Adam at January 13, 2014 08:26 AM (Aif/5)
What's the "our" stuff?
As a tea partier, Christie isn't "we" in any sense of the word.
He's Hillary Clinton with fatter cankles.
Posted by: Veeshir at January 13, 2014 08:26 AM (dKqLR)
One other thing. This election represents the first time that I will no longer just vote for GOP b/c it's the GOP.
I'll back our people all the way, but when it comes to President, I will no longer, ever, just vote for these fucks b/c the GOP name is next to them.
Oh, I'm contributing to the slide. If you haven't noticed, we're already pretty much there. Why in the fuck do we have to continue to fight OUR OWN FUCKING PEOPLE on core issues like amnesty/zerocare/personal freedom/debt and deficits??????????
I'm done. Run a squish, someone who's not proven as a solid conservative on the core issues, and welcome President Clinton once again you stupid fucking squish GOPers. I will never vote for a squish again and at least I can tell my children that we tried to do something.
Posted by: prescient11 at January 13, 2014 08:26 AM (tVTLU)
Posted by: acat at January 13, 2014 08:27 AM (4UkCP)
If Christie thought he was gonna get any benefit from his obama ball licking, he was naive and is gonna learn a big fat rotund lesson. Federal investigations for Bridgaquiddick and Sandyaquiddick coming right up.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at January 13, 2014 08:27 AM (n0DEs)
Posted by: Marcus at January 13, 2014 08:27 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: Plaintiff Pug at January 13, 2014 08:27 AM (Qev5V)
Christie can go to hell.
Conservatives should pile on him, but only as a mechanism to attack Obama.
"The Christie administration using traffic planning against political opponents reminds me of the Obama administration sic'ing the IRS on their political opponents"
or better yet
"In any case where a political administration has used its power against political opponents, like Christie's has been accused of I take this as a serious issue. But, as the Obama administration has made this a way of life and no one has been punished, I guess you in the media in fact see this as completely normal. Can you explain to me why that is Mr/Ms Media Talk Head?"
Posted by: 18-1 at January 13, 2014 08:27 AM (P3U0f)
Christie is what most conservatives would call a RINO. He shows more leadership skills than the SCOAMF, but he is still Dem Light.
Posted by: Marmo at January 13, 2014 08:28 AM (QW+AD)
Posted by: West at January 13, 2014 08:28 AM (1Rgee)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at January 13, 2014 08:28 AM (deaac)
***
"Moderate" Republicans seem to keep making the same mistake.
Ask Bush 43 about letting Ted Kennedy write parts "No Child Left Behind", Bush 41 about his bipartisan tax increases, etc...
Posted by: 18-1 at January 13, 2014 08:29 AM (P3U0f)
The first thing Rove gets wrong is equating all conservatives with the Tea Party. The Tea Party is purely fiscal in nature. It's about out of control gubmint spending. So immediately Krispy loses TEA Party cred on account of his Superstorm Sandy slush fund.
And the Tea Party is just one part of the whole conservative movement. It's fair to say that most conservatives are Tea Partiers from a fiscal point of view, but there are larger social issues that aren't necessarily Tea Party in nature (though it's all related). Amnesty. Gun control. Domestic surveillance. Radical Islamists. Law and order. These are all things that are very, very important to the conservative wing of the "Republican" party, and Christie fails on every last one of them.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/i][/u][/b] at January 13, 2014 08:29 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl 45 days until spring training at January 13, 2014 08:29 AM (u8GsB)
Posted by: Thunderb at January 13, 2014 08:29 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Marcus at January 13, 2014 08:29 AM (GGCsk)
1) The Dems want to tarnish CC because they seem him as the GOP frontrunner
2) The establishment GOP (Rove, Boehner) want to prop-up and defend CC because they seem him as the GOP frontrunner.
Regarding #2, the argument is that "why is CC's scandal getting so much coverage and the (D) scandals are not?" Now that's a legitimate counter-argument but it is not an affirmative defense to the actual allegations.
The meme is that CC is being honest, strong and straightforward throughout the scandal. The GOP-leaning LIVs around here are already falling for it.
We need to be vigilant and be working now to make sure 2016 isn't already decided for us.
Posted by: Iasonas at January 13, 2014 08:29 AM (RUraj)
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 13, 2014 08:29 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at January 13, 2014 08:30 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at January 13, 2014 08:30 AM (7ObY1)
Oh? how about Hillary is the Prog candidate, and Christie is the Retard candidate.
Are you going to sit home, or go out and vote for the lesser of two weasels? if you do sit at home, then don't bitch too loudly when Hillary gets busy continuing the policies of Emperor Teh Won teh First.
I would appreciate your newsletter detailing exactly how Christie will cut back, eliminate or otherwise block the all-seeing, all-registering security state we have now.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at January 13, 2014 08:30 AM (zF6Iw)
http://tinyurl.com/khbr9gg
Matt Lauer fellates Obama right there in front of Bob Gates and everybody!
'Dangerous or Dishonorable" criticism of Obama.
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at January 13, 2014 08:30 AM (BZAd3)
Posted by: DangerGirl at January 13, 2014 08:30 AM (EYfcP)
Were any of you who self-identify as Tea Partiers partly won over by Christie's press conference?
It didn't move. That's the test, right?
I wouldn't vote for Gov. Creosote for Prez even if a limosine full of busty NFL cheerleaders pulled up to my house to give me a ride to the polls.
Posted by: Count de Costanza at January 13, 2014 08:30 AM (BAS5M)
***
We've been running "moderate" Republicans for President since 1988. We've had a "moderate" Congressional leadership since the late 90s.
How well is that strategy working out?
Posted by: 18-1 at January 13, 2014 08:30 AM (P3U0f)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at January 13, 2014 08:30 AM (deaac)
I have doubts about his electability, even before the bridge nonsense. He comes off like a bully, and I see that act wearing thin in a national campaign. he also seems to be the type that enjoys having "Sister Souljah" moments where he gets to bash conservatives.
But I'm not one of these TruCon retards that is going to threaten to sit out the election if he gets nominated. Somehow, a "real" conservative now is one that's willing to help put a Democrat in the White House in order to show everyone who's boss.
I could see him getting nominated, especially if there's a really crowded primary.
Posted by: McAdams at January 13, 2014 08:31 AM (iq3N/)
Posted by: Drider at January 13, 2014 08:31 AM (/VmYa)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 13, 2014 08:31 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 13, 2014 08:31 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: Jeanne of the North at January 13, 2014 08:32 AM (GdalM)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at January 13, 2014 08:32 AM (1hM1d)
I don't call people like Christie and Rove RINOs anymore, simply because they exactly represent the current Repub party.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at January 13, 2014 08:32 AM (n0DEs)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at January 13, 2014 08:32 AM (32Ze2)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at January 13, 2014 08:32 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: votermom at January 13, 2014 08:33 AM (GSIDW)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 13, 2014 08:33 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Paid for by Citizens for Clyde the Orangutan at January 13, 2014 08:33 AM (QF8uk)
***
The left has changed from favouring international to national socialism.
It would be an exaggeration to say one's vote doesn't count - but the system whereby the government steals from me to buy the votes of others makes the standard notions of how representative government works problematic.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 13, 2014 08:33 AM (P3U0f)
Remind me who got fired or really held responsible?
And did she say it was completely her fault?
What about the big expose on 60 Minutes?
Yet here we are talking about a bridge and some traffic...
Oh and news flash. Politicians provide more help to people who support them.
Posted by: Marcus at January 13, 2014 08:33 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at January 13, 2014 08:33 AM (il1Hy)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at January 13, 2014 08:34 AM (1hM1d)
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 13, 2014 08:34 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at January 13, 2014 08:34 AM (9+ccr)
Posted by: toby928© beating memes to death since 2006 at January 13, 2014 08:34 AM (QupBk)
Way to go, Turd Blossom!
Posted by: mrp at January 13, 2014 08:34 AM (HjPtV)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at January 13, 2014 08:34 AM (deaac)
"In any case where a political administration has used its power against political opponents, like Christie's has been accused of I take this as a serious issue. But, as the Obama administration has made this a way of life and no one has been punished, I guess you in the media in fact see this as completely normal. Can you explain to me why that is Mr/Ms Media Talk Head?"
Posted by: 18-1 at January 13, 2014 12:27 PM (P3U0f)
This is my rejoinder to these idiots.
"I can call Christie a rotten, no good scoundrel because I'm equal opportunity. But if you're a Democrat, or a liberal, or anyone else who self-identifies as 'left-wing,' and you didn't say a damn word about the audacity of our President shutting down private businesses, wide-open public spaces, and trying to keep people from looking at FUCKING SCENERY, then you can shut your g-ddamn mouth and shove a traffic cone up your ass, because you've got no right to say a fucking word, you commie shitweasel."
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/i][/u][/b] at January 13, 2014 08:34 AM (4df7R)
4 I've yet to have anyone explain to me just why the sweet Mary and Jesus the fat fucktard needed to hold a 2hr press conference in the first place.
It was a test to see if he could go that long without eating
Posted by: The Jackhole at January 13, 2014 08:34 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Thunderb at January 13, 2014 08:34 AM (zOTsN)
We could get one of those Hollywood voice over types to do the talking.
Posted by: Marcus at January 13, 2014 08:35 AM (GGCsk)
***
Yep. If the Republicans want to win they are going to have to actually run a conservative for President for the first time in 32 years. I sure as hell will not vote for another John McRomneybush.
Give me a choice, not an echo.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 13, 2014 08:35 AM (P3U0f)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at January 13, 2014 08:35 AM (deaac)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 13, 2014 08:36 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Trucon Retard at January 13, 2014 08:36 AM (Aif/5)
The explanation will be the single greatest sentence ever transcribed.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at January 13, 2014 08:36 AM (yZwfe)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at January 13, 2014 08:36 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: seems legit at January 13, 2014 08:36 AM (A98Xu)
Posted by: MTF at January 13, 2014 08:36 AM (F58x4)
Somehow, a "real" conservative now is one that's willing to help put a Democrat in the White House in order to show everyone who's boss.
------
Funny how it's always the conservatives who have to bite their knuckles and vote against their principles in favor of their Establishment Betters.
So yeah, count me as a Real Conservative, not a guy who's willing to throw a tantrum to get their RINO asses in office by withholding support for a conservative candidate.
Posted by: @JohnTant at January 13, 2014 08:36 AM (PFy0L)
I wouldn't vote for Gov. Creosote for Prez even if a limosine full of busty NFL cheerleaders pulled up to my house to give me a ride to the polls.
Wait - that's a choice?
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at January 13, 2014 08:37 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: toby928© beating memes to death since 2006 at January 13, 2014 08:37 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 13, 2014 08:37 AM (Ttj5v)
Posted by: Karl Rove at January 13, 2014 08:37 AM (oFCZn)
Posted by: President Barack Obama at January 13, 2014 08:37 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at January 13, 2014 08:37 AM (deaac)
You are absolutely correct. Now that Democrats are spending all their time trying to destroy him, they don't want to waste it. They want to leverage all the work they've done and help make him the candidate.
Posted by: Marcus at January 13, 2014 08:38 AM (GGCsk)
Posted by: Countrysquire at January 13, 2014 08:38 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: NotCoach at January 13, 2014 08:38 AM (rsudF)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at January 13, 2014 08:38 AM (U1Tts)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl 45 days until spring training at January 13, 2014 08:38 AM (u8GsB)
It would be nice to have a little more than that.
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at January 13, 2014 08:38 AM (BZAd3)
***
I think he does understand us. The problem is that he and his ilk running the Republican party want to control the Leviathan that Obama built, not dismantle it.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 13, 2014 08:38 AM (P3U0f)
Second look at Millard Fillmore?
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at January 13, 2014 08:39 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: WalrusRex at January 13, 2014 08:39 AM (frwKr)
Shit, ask Reagan about his "grand bargain" with Tip O'Neill in which Reagan agreed to the TEFRA tax increases in exchange for liberals on Capitol Hill agreeing to spending cuts in a carefully planned proportion.
The actual ratio of spending cuts to tax hikes turned out to be 0:1.
Worse, really. Spending not only did not go down. It did not even stay flat. It went UP. The Democrats completely rooked Dutch. Who was a man of his word and foolishly figured they were as well.
Posted by: torquewrench at January 13, 2014 08:39 AM (gqT4g)
And it works, big-time. President Historic First© can keep on with the busy work of screwing up the country while all eyes are fixed firmly on the Jersey Nothingburger.
Christie couldn't be less worthy of our attention if he was a genuine Democrat. But he's Big News, 24/7. We've been punked. Again.
Posted by: MrScribbler at January 13, 2014 08:39 AM (ff7/5)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl 45 days until spring training at January 13, 2014 08:40 AM (u8GsB)
Posted by: firefirefire at January 13, 2014 08:40 AM (nAkDV)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at January 13, 2014 08:40 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 13, 2014 08:40 AM (Ttj5v)
Posted by: Paid for by Citizens for Clyde the Orangutan at January 13, 2014 08:40 AM (QF8uk)
This whole fiasco proves that Christie is either a very poor judge of character, or else a petty, small-minded, vindictive bastard. Or, most likely, both. Not only has this GWB incident moved him to the bottom of my list of Preezy candidates, it's moved him off my list completely.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/i][/u][/b] at January 13, 2014 08:40 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: votermom at January 13, 2014 08:40 AM (GSIDW)
Posted by: WalrusRex
I believe it is 'electable.'
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at January 13, 2014 08:41 AM (yZwfe)
The new F-150 is an awesome looking truck. I want one.
Posted by: Truck Monkey at January 13, 2014 08:41 AM (32Ze2)
=============
Wait! How is that not Christie to a "t"?
Someone said it best: The reason John McCain's fat little brother undercut Romney was thus: If it wounds, Romney knows he has to buy him back for 2016. If it was fatal, it'd clear the deck for him in 2016.
Remember: Christie knows what's in his closet (besides a stash of doughnuts). Eight years hanging around NJ and something will leak. As it already has.
Posted by: RoyalOil at January 13, 2014 08:41 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: maddogg at January 13, 2014 08:41 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at January 13, 2014 08:41 AM (5xmd7)
Posted by: Deety at January 13, 2014 08:41 AM (daK3O)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at January 13, 2014 08:42 AM (deaac)
Nominate Christie and we will sit at home again. I don't care if the Dems are running Satan. Tired of having Lucy as my placekick holder.
Posted by: Fen at January 13, 2014 08:42 AM (a422o)
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at January 13, 2014 08:42 AM (il1Hy)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit at January 13, 2014 12:34 PM (4df7R)
Will you marry me, MWR?
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at January 13, 2014 08:42 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: t-bird at January 13, 2014 08:42 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: sven10077 at January 13, 2014 08:42 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: Thunderb at January 13, 2014 08:42 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at January 13, 2014 08:42 AM (oFCZn)
Posted by: votermom at January 13, 2014 12:40 PM (GSIDW)
We need more of that in this country.
Lots more.
Posted by: Dandolo at January 13, 2014 08:42 AM (0XBx+)
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at January 13, 2014 08:42 AM (kxSZr)
Posted by: Karl Rove at January 13, 2014 12:37 PM (oFCZn)
***
This is the central problem. We revolted against the Republicans over amnesty in 2006 and in 2008 they gave us one of the foremost amnesty shills in the Republican party.
In 2010 we revolted against Obamacare and achieved historic successes for the Republican party, and in 2012 the Republicans gave us the architect of Obamacare v1.0
Right now Rove and co believe that we will continue to support them no matter who they run preciously because we have for the last decade. So how are we going to convince them that this is no longer true?
Or will most conservatives collaborate and support a Christie or Jeb Bush in 2016 like the leadership wants?
Posted by: 18-1 at January 13, 2014 08:43 AM (P3U0f)
And more importantly, don't shake his hand.
Posted by: Marcus at January 13, 2014 08:43 AM (GGCsk)
A Christie nomination would be our worst bad option.
Posted by: [/i]KG at January 13, 2014 08:43 AM (p7BzH)
Posted by: bigmacattack at January 13, 2014 08:43 AM (dx4Dr)
Posted by: Socratease at January 13, 2014 08:43 AM (SZUi2)
Ace wrote:
BTW, I think people are wrong to rule out Christie categorically. Sometimes the only good option is one you don't particularly like. I could see, for example, a scenario in which conservatism continues to be unpopular at the national level, and Christie (or a similar RINO) might be our only plausible vehicle for winning the White House.
-------------
Whole lotta people here who still think 100% conservatism is just HUGELY popular, we just have never had a candidate who properly espoused it and explained it to millons of people who want free shit from the government.
We ain't gonna yank America all the way back from Obama lite-socialism to Calvin Coolidge in one Presidential election, y'all. We have to get someone elected in 2016 that will start the process, hopefully with a more conservative House and Senate.
Posted by: rockmom at January 13, 2014 08:43 AM (NYnoe)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 13, 2014 08:43 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: MaxMBJ at January 13, 2014 08:44 AM (deaac)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 13, 2014 08:44 AM (Ttj5v)
Ace,
Believe it or not, I am not categorically anti-Christie. I can see
scenarios where I would support someone like Christie. However, I doubt
those scenarios will come to pass by 2016. (The scenarios all include
changing the GOP enough to trust it to NOT act completely liberally).
BTW, I think people are wrong to rule out Christie categorically. Sometimes
the only good option is one you don't particularly like. I could see, for
example, a scenario in which conservatism continues to be unpopular at the
national level, and Christie (or a similar RINO) might be our only plausible
vehicle for winning the White House.
The problem with a Christie presidency in 2016 would be that if the DNC holds
one or both congressional houses, Christie will be perfectly happy governing
from the center-left to far-left.
Meanwhile, if the GOP holds one or both congressional houses, the GOP will be
happy to follow Christie as he governs from the center-left to far-left.
Your argument follows the traditional conservative way of thinking - which is
that WE MUST support the GOP no matter what to defeat the democrats. But,
what does that really get us? So far, it is has done nothing but enable
the GOP to be big-spending, amnesty supporting, gov't enlarging fools.
Continuing to do that will simply keep the status quo.
So, if Christie ends up being truly the best we can do (because either there is
no conservative GOP candidate or because Christie beats a better candidate in
the primary), what does supporting the GOP actually accomplish in that
scenario? Does supporting the GOP and helping Christie win move the GOP
to the right? No. Does it reduce the size or scope of gov't?
Unlikely? Does it roll back any of the left's gains? Again,
unlikely.
So, in that situation, what would that vote accomplish?
I'm still arguing for the tactic of conservatives refusing to vote for the GOP
and forcing the GOP to decide whether it is going to be (at all) conservative
or not. From the evidence, that is likely the only way to move the GOP
rightward.
For instance, there is this from National Review's interview withClub for
Growth president Chris Chocola in response to a question on the
Ryan budget compromise:
I’m notgoing to bash or defend Ryan on it. I’m sure if he was left to his own devices to do a deal it wouldn’t be that one. But the reason he couldn’t do the one that he would have done is because he didn’t have enough Republican votes to do it. He just simply didn’t have enough Republicans that said they would keep the sequester. That’s always the problem. That’s what I learned when I was in Congress. That’s what has changed my life and why I do what I do, is the realization that it’s Republicans that don’t do what they say they’re going to do when they ask for people’s votes. So whatever the number would have been, 40, 50, defense hawks and appropriators who said they weren’t going to keep the budget caps under the sequester — it’s the Republicans that are the problem, not the Democrats.
They always say, well, we donÂ’t have the majority. Well, you did here. And all you had to do was pass a clean CR and send it to Harry Reid and see what he did with it. The Budget Control Act was bipartisan and those that supported it now want to get rid of it. And the groups that were against it are now for it.
Every time the Republicans say theyÂ’re going to spend less they donÂ’t. If any of your readers believe that Congress will spend less in ten years while they spend more now, then theyÂ’re wrong. I canÂ’t believe anyone actually believes that theyÂ’re going to do the hard work in ten years from now or eight years from now that theyÂ’re not willing to do now. YouÂ’re going to have maybe two different presidents by then? And youÂ’re going to have four congressional elections by then? Half of Â’em wonÂ’t even be there.
ThereÂ’s just nothing in history that would give confidence that theyÂ’ll live up to the budget deal that they made, that it would truly be deficit-reducing or even deficit-neutral.
That is from someone who was a GOP congressional insider telling you that the GOP has no interest in conservatism. And yet we continue pretending it does. Both in what we say (on blogs, etc) and in our actions (our votes). And we expect different results from what we have received?
Posted by: monkeytoe at January 13, 2014 08:44 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 13, 2014 08:44 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Marcus at January 13, 2014 12:33 PM (GGCsk)
It's not about a bridge and some traffic.
It's about a politician's office having no qualms about using the POWER of that office to deliberately and vindictively take revenge on someone who didn't kowtow like a proper peasant. I couldn't give a flying fuck about Fort Lee, NJ, its mayor, or the g-ddamn bridge. I give a LOT of fucks about a politician who hires people like that and then pretends to be shocked and shaken when he discovers what they did.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/i][/u][/b] at January 13, 2014 08:45 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 13, 2014 08:45 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: Truck Monkey at January 13, 2014 08:45 AM (32Ze2)
Does anyone think for a second that if Mike Lee or Ted Cruz had a problem that Christie wouldn't be the first Republican to run to the MSM demanding that they resign because they're a disgrace to America and the GOP?
Posted by: kbdabear at January 13, 2014 08:45 AM (aTXUx)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 13, 2014 08:45 AM (Ttj5v)
Posted by: WalrusRex at January 13, 2014 08:45 AM (frwKr)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 13, 2014 08:45 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at January 13, 2014 08:46 AM (8ZskC)
IMHO, I really can't see anyone worth a damn wanting to be president after the shambles this regime is going to leave this country. In three years, the presents times will seem like the good ole days.
Posted by: Soona at January 13, 2014 08:46 AM (lG8Uj)
Posted by: toby928© beating memes to death since 2006 at January 13, 2014 08:46 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Countrysquire at January 13, 2014 08:47 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: Romeo13 at January 13, 2014 08:47 AM (lZBBB)
Posted by: sexypig at January 13, 2014 08:47 AM (dZQh7)
Posted by: Lebron Horowitz. at January 13, 2014 08:47 AM (cL+9V)
***
Two parties, but only one agenda.
Welcome to Rove's world.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 13, 2014 08:47 AM (P3U0f)
Just like in 2008, I liked Giuliani, even though he was flawed because I saw a fighter, and on most of the big picture issues, he was with us. McCain, however, was always looking for a way to surrender, stab us in the bag and reach across the aisle, but "on paper" McCain had a more conservative record. Sure enough, Mccain basically threw in the towel early on. The piece of shit was cutting commercials saying how awesome he thought Obama was.
Posted by: McAdams at January 13, 2014 08:47 AM (iq3N/)
The problem w/ Rand for Prez is the baggage of his dad.
He'd be my ideal candidate for AG for 8 yrs tho!
Posted by: prescient11 at January 13, 2014 08:47 AM (tVTLU)
They said, "This is dogwhistle. He's speaking Joisey. So when the rest of us hear him saying to Obama, 'My, sir, your ass is certainly extra nommy today. I can't remember ever having tasted such a delicious ass,' what that translates to in Joisey is 'Hey folks, things are a mess right now and I gotta do this in order to fix them and get you all taken care of.'"
They predicted that this would ensure Christie's local popularity. Which it seemed to do. And for a guy whose political hopes don't go any farther than New Jersey, maybe that's a viable way to position himself.
But I can tell you that it sure doesn't play outside of NJ.
Posted by: torquewrench at January 13, 2014 08:48 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: sexypig at January 13, 2014 08:49 AM (dZQh7)
Posted by: Alberta Oil Peon at January 13, 2014 08:49 AM (60Q+L)
Fat Bastard Rino as the GOP candidate will guarantee defeat. I would stay home for sure, and so would the rest of my family.
Posted by: maddogg at January 13, 2014 08:49 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 13, 2014 08:49 AM (Ttj5v)
Posted by: Thunderb at January 13, 2014 08:49 AM (zOTsN)
**
Ironically, Romney is pretty much the new liberal government man to a tee.
He's honest, competent, and smart.
The problem for us is that he is every bit the liberal technocrat that Obama wants to be.
Posted by: 18-1 at January 13, 2014 08:50 AM (P3U0f)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 13, 2014 08:50 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: toby928© beating memes to death since 2006 at January 13, 2014 08:50 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: WalrusRex at January 13, 2014 08:50 AM (frwKr)
Posted by: [/i] [/s] [/u] [/b] The Sanity Police at January 13, 2014 08:50 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: sven10077 at January 13, 2014 08:50 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: t-bird at January 13, 2014 08:50 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: akula51[/b][/i][/s] at January 13, 2014 08:50 AM (ZcS8q)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 13, 2014 08:50 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Fen at January 13, 2014 12:42 PM (a422o)
At least Satan is upfront about what he wants, and what his goals are.
Posted by: Secundus at January 13, 2014 08:51 AM (FkSC4)
#219 Or maybe he's an executive who delegates everything, and he asked his people what was the deal with the lane closures in Ft. Lee that everyone's yelling about, and they told him it was a Port Authority traffic study and it only lasted a few days. And he said, OK, sounds plausible, bullshit issue being overblown by Democrats, let's get back to the campaign. The fact that he appointed a couple of loyalists to the PA staff doesn't mean he communicated with them or ever expected them to do any stupid political stunts there; it means those are plum patronage jobs and he had a few to give out.
Just wondering, did anyone here think Reagan was either (a) dangerously out of touch with his staff and should have known what they were doing, or (b) lied his ass off about how much he knew about Iran-Contra? Or did you thnk, he has a White House chief of staff and a National Security Advisor to handle this stuff and they kept him in the dark?
Posted by: rockmom at January 13, 2014 08:51 AM (Q4elb)
This.
This with the heat of a thousand exploding suns.
Posted by: torquewrench at January 13, 2014 08:51 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at January 13, 2014 08:51 AM (9+ccr)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at January 13, 2014 08:52 AM (g4TxM)
Posted by: akula51[/b][/i][/s] at January 13, 2014 08:52 AM (ZcS8q)
You might as well face it. If the fat man or prince jebward are your repub nominees, it will mean 4 more years of clintonism.
Think super happy thoughts.
Posted by: I'll take option C for a 1000 Alex at January 13, 2014 08:52 AM (nkPV9)
Posted by: Additional Blond Agent at January 13, 2014 08:52 AM (PMGbu)
Couple of thoughts......
I am very concerned about people (pols, staffers, the media) in the country that are entirely too comfortable with the idea of using the levers of the power of government to punish people. Whether its that bint on Christies staff that wanted a little local Jersey style paybackck, the other bint that headed up the IRS and used her position to persecute conservative groups, The POTUS that keeps a list and wants his supporters to "get in theyre faces"...... and probably the worst of the lot..... the fricken media that either wont cover things like F&F, The IRS, bugging journalists families..... but will just go apeshit because somebody on Christies staff put traffic cones on a bridge.
Either we all deserve protection from out of control pols.... or we delve down the path of retributional government, and down that pathe lies or destruction.
Posted by: fixerupper at January 13, 2014 08:52 AM (nELVU)
We cannot afford any more "lessons" like Obama.
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 13, 2014 12:44 PM (DmNpO)
---------------------------------------------
Don't agree. Christie is just another bad lesson. He's a prog. And I'm not voting for a prog.
Besides. My focus is on my state now. The fed has long since past the point of being a lost cause. It's the only way we're going to insure our freedom and start rolling things back to Constitutional government.
Posted by: Soona at January 13, 2014 08:53 AM (lG8Uj)
Posted by: sven10077 at January 13, 2014 08:53 AM (TE35l)
Rove sounds like a grad student anthropologist on his first field expedition, machete in one hand, notebook in the other, attempting to devine the motivations of a heretofore undiscovered aboriginal tribe. How strange we must seem to him.
So no, I don't know nuthin' about no street cred for Chris Christie. I do know that a leader's personality, morals and manner of thought ripple downward throughout the organization he or she leads and shape the culture of the work environment. Christie's subordinates did what they thought would please the boss, what he would do in their stead. Look at IRS persecution of Tea Party groups and conservative donors and activists. Same thing.
Posted by: troyriser at January 13, 2014 08:53 AM (gNlvW)
Posted by: sexypig at January 13, 2014 08:53 AM (dZQh7)
Posted by: Meremortal at January 13, 2014 08:53 AM (1Y+hH)
Not saying that will be the case. I'm saying it could be that way. And in that case, a Christie nomination might be our least bad option, with our worst bad option being "run a symbolic candidate who will be doomed on Election Day and curse the nation into another four years of grueling political and economic hell."
Uh. No. Not for me and not for most conservatives I know.
I'm not nearly as worried about who is in the White House as I am in actually having a political party that represents conservatism. If we don't have *that* than our long national nightmare will be another four or so decades while we build that party.
Thus I am focused like a laser on actually having a legitimate Republican Party -- and that being so, Christie is not an option under any circumstances that I can conceive of. In other words, if it's a choice between A) reclaiming the Republican Party and Hillary being President, or B) not reclaiming the Republican Party and having the likes of McConnell as Senate Majority Leader and Boehner as the House Majority Leader and Chris Christie as President, so that they can continue advocating for "better managed by us Big State Collective" and then conservatives moving on to another party -- the choice is easy. I choose option A -- and there are an increasing number of conservatives out there just like me. More than when McCain ran. More than when Romney ran.
The fact that establishment Republicans haven't figured that choice out yet -- and how many of their former base have made choice A) -- just boggles my mind.
But they'll get it. Someday.
Posted by: Igor at January 13, 2014 08:53 AM (12FFY)
Posted by: WalrusRex at January 13, 2014 08:54 AM (frwKr)
Posted by: Thunderb at January 13, 2014 08:54 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Mark Andrew Edwards at January 13, 2014 08:54 AM (Cati5)
And what would be the point of that? Is there that much daylight between the policy preferences of Governor Creosote and Secretary Cankles?
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at January 13, 2014 08:54 AM (QXlbZ)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 13, 2014 08:54 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at January 13, 2014 12:25 PM (9+ccr)
Except that it won't. Running a RINO for the Presidency is pretty much a guaranteed loser, *that* has been well established in recent history.
Posted by: [/i]KG at January 13, 2014 08:55 AM (p7BzH)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 13, 2014 08:55 AM (Ttj5v)
If we are going over the cliff either turn the bus around or speed it up. This frog in the slow cooking pot BS has to stop.
Posted by: Dandolo at January 13, 2014 08:55 AM (0XBx+)
Posted by: polynikes at January 13, 2014 08:55 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at January 13, 2014 12:51 PM (9+ccr)
Feeling fucking noble has nothing to do with it. The fat bastard would be ZERO improvement over a leftard. Zero. So why add my vote to the insult?
Posted by: maddogg at January 13, 2014 08:55 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: toby928© beating memes to death since 2006 at January 13, 2014 08:55 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Hawaii at January 13, 2014 08:55 AM (RJMhd)
I remember when the same bullshit was being flung about McCain.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at January 13, 2014 08:56 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Born Free at January 13, 2014 08:56 AM (xL8Hf)
We ain't gonna yank America all the way back from Obama lite-socialism to Calvin Coolidge in one Presidential election, y'all. We have to get someone elected in 2016 that will start the process, hopefully with a more conservative House and Senate.
Granted. But Christie is not that man.
Mister, we could use a man like Calvin Coolidge again.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at January 13, 2014 08:56 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl 45 days until spring training at January 13, 2014 08:57 AM (u8GsB)
Posted by: Thunderb at January 13, 2014 08:57 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 13, 2014 08:57 AM (Ttj5v)
Posted by: Stringer Davis at January 13, 2014 08:58 AM (xq1UY)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 13, 2014 08:58 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, still chilly at January 13, 2014 08:58 AM (naUcP)
Where is there any indication that Governor Creosote is in any way inclined to take even a baby-step in the Coolidge direction?
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at January 13, 2014 08:58 AM (QXlbZ)
-----
300. Heh!!
THIS IS SPARTA!!!!!!
Posted by: fixerupper at January 13, 2014 08:59 AM (nELVU)
Wow! Can't wait to read about that! Why, if Poppin' Fresh and the gang think it's "interesting", it must be major news.
Turns out that their definition of "interesting" is that Ed Gillespie, K Street lobbyist extraordinaire, lifetime RINO establishment bought-off party hack, the guy who brought us Senator Liz Dole, is throwing his hat in the ring.
Why, I can't tell you how excited I am by that. Positively galvanized.
Gillespie is basically a Republican version of Terry McAuliffe.
Wonderful. Just fucking wonderful.
Posted by: torquewrench at January 13, 2014 08:59 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: sexypig at January 13, 2014 08:59 AM (dZQh7)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 13, 2014 09:00 AM (PYAXX)
THIS IS SPARTA!!!!!!
Posted by: fixerupper at January 13, 2014 12:59 PM (nELVU)
What's depressing is what King Leonides would say today:
"SPARTANS!!!! PREPARE FOR DISAPPOINTMENT!"
Posted by: EC at January 13, 2014 09:00 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: RLTW at January 13, 2014 09:00 AM (rJCBA)
Posted by: Countrysquire at January 13, 2014 09:01 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: sven10077 at January 13, 2014 09:02 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: Hawaii at January 13, 2014 09:02 AM (RJMhd)
Posted by: Joffen, fucking sunshine patriot at January 13, 2014 09:02 AM (Wp8ly)
Posted by: Daybrother at January 13, 2014 09:02 AM (5ViSV)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 13, 2014 09:02 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at January 13, 2014 09:02 AM (o4Xc4)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 13, 2014 09:02 AM (Ttj5v)
Posted by: EC at January 13, 2014 01:00 PM (GQ8sn)
-----
Heh.
"Shpartansh......... We have nothing to fear from a Xerxeeesh Preshidency".
Posted by: fixerupper at January 13, 2014 09:03 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at January 13, 2014 09:03 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at January 13, 2014 09:03 AM (zF6Iw)
Posted by: Mandy P., lurking lurker who lurks at January 13, 2014 09:03 AM (qFpRI)
Posted by: Countrysquire at January 13, 2014 01:01 PM (LSJmV)
---------------------------------------------
Yup. Gave Christie a boner, it did.
Posted by: Soona at January 13, 2014 09:03 AM (lG8Uj)
Posted by: GOP at January 13, 2014 09:03 AM (oFCZn)
Posted by: alexthechick - Come to us, oh mighty SMOD at January 13, 2014 09:03 AM (VtjlW)
Posted by: Thunderb at January 13, 2014 09:03 AM (zOTsN)
Christie went from conservative hero to villain all because he put his arm around Obama during the Sandy hurricane visit. I was also outraged by it, I thought it was a bad time to have a bipartisan moment, but I can't get from that outrage to "I want Hillary as President to prove a point"
There is a difference between Hillary and Christie. From reforming pension plans, taking on the public sector unions vetoting numerous tax increases, vetoed gay marriage, etc. all with a Democrat legislature. Let's not forget, Hillary tried to shove socialized medicine down our throat before Obama did. And I'll take even a RINO President judicial picks over any Democrat, even Bush Sr. gave us Clarence Thomas.
I'd like Rand Paul to be President, but I'm not going to take my ball home if the Party chooses someone else because I don't want to have a beer with Christie.
Posted by: McAdams at January 13, 2014 09:03 AM (iq3N/)
Totally true. Nothing warms the cockles of my heart more than a GOP candidate who actually attacks their opponent.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Yeah, he sure attacked Obama on that beach right before the election...
Posted by: Countrysquire at January 13, 2014 01:01 PM (LSJmV)
Whatever he may have in tenacity he lacks in, you know, being conservative. Who cares if he can get dirty in the trenches if he will not actually fight the battles that need to be fought.
You know little things, such as, rolling back the size and scope of government, rolling back regulations and heaven forbid agencies, and so on.
Posted by: Dandolo at January 13, 2014 09:04 AM (0XBx+)
Posted by: rickb223 at January 13, 2014 09:05 AM (CRyse)
Yet the likes of Rove, Christie, McCain and other insiders still continue to be shocked that the MSM only likes Republicans when they bash conservatives and libertarians
Posted by: kbdabear at January 13, 2014 09:05 AM (aTXUx)
Posted by: GnuBreed at January 13, 2014 09:05 AM (wNF3N)
Posted by: Cameo Appearance at January 13, 2014 09:05 AM (R8yKQ)
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at January 13, 2014 09:06 AM (il1Hy)
Posted by: RLTW at January 13, 2014 01:00 PM (rJCBA)
So you will not vote?
I will never understand this logic. I understand that your choices are between bad and worse but not voting changes nothing. One of the two will be elected. If you think electing a Republican will be worse in the long run then vote for the Democrat. You should always be part of the process until there is no process.
Posted by: polynikes at January 13, 2014 09:06 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: RLTW at January 13, 2014 01:00 PM (rJCBA)
I don't regret my votes for either George W. Bush or Mitt Romney. Both are good men, smart and capable and the best candidates to emerge out of their respective primaries. On the other hand, I deeply, profoundly regret my vote for John McCain. I suspect he loathes Republican conservatives as much as we loathe him.
Posted by: troyriser at January 13, 2014 09:07 AM (gNlvW)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at January 13, 2014 09:08 AM (U1Tts)
Posted by: RioBravo at January 13, 2014 09:08 AM (eEfYn)
Posted by: Thunderb at January 13, 2014 12:54 PM (zOTsN)
He also prosecuted and convicted 135 elected officials. You think he didn't now how easy it is to get caught abusing power and violating the public trust? That this was the worst possible thing he could do to his corruption-fighting brand? I didn't suggest he was naive, I suggested he is a delegator and it isn't unreasonable to think he would have no reason to believe a stunt this stupid was planned by people he trusted.
Posted by: rockmom at January 13, 2014 09:08 AM (Q4elb)
the Jersey Blob & Rove can both go straight to hell & stay there.
Posted by: redc1c4 at January 13, 2014 09:09 AM (q+fqH)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Rounding Error Extraordinaire at January 13, 2014 09:09 AM (ImFNb)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at January 13, 2014 09:09 AM (o4Xc4)
That is, what good is it if you keep it a secret? There are traffic jams all the time. If this particular jam was meant as punishment, at some point didnÂ’t they know they had to make the reason for the lane closings public?
And what was the payback? Are people in that city going to vote for ChristieÂ’s mayoral choice now that Christie has wasted their time and they know it?
Posted by: Paid for by Citizens for Clyde the Orangutan at January 13, 2014 12:40 PM (QF8uk)"
I agree with you wholeheartedly. The whole thing doesn't make any sense. I think there was something ging on that no one is saying.
Here's the calculus, as proposed by pretty much everybody: can somebody please fill in step 2:
1. Cause traffic jam in NJ/Ft Lee.
2. ?
3. Republican Electoral Victory!!!!
The media seem to be thinking "If we scream loud enough, no one will notice that there is no step 2".
Posted by: West at January 13, 2014 09:10 AM (1Rgee)
Posted by: sexypig at January 13, 2014 09:10 AM (dZQh7)
Posted by: Fritz at January 13, 2014 09:10 AM (UzPAd)
Posted by: sven10077 at January 13, 2014 09:10 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: polynikes at January 13, 2014 01:06 PM (m2CN7)
I would rather speed up our decline than merely slow it down, myself.
I have said this before and I stick to it today: TFG has hopefully helped the nation in the long run by turning things to crap and if more crap is needed for LIVs to learn then so be it. I will survive and help rebuild when the time comes. But I would rather be the one to suffer now than leave a crap hole of a nation for my children.
Posted by: Dandolo at January 13, 2014 09:10 AM (0XBx+)
Posted by: sexypig at January 13, 2014 09:10 AM (dZQh7)
That'll be a beauty if it has legs.
Heh.
Fuck you, you fat tubber shit.
Posted by: RoyalOil at January 13, 2014 09:10 AM (VjL9S)
I will go no matter who is on the election ticket. However, how many empty boxes on the ballot, is entirely up to me.
My guess is that in 2014 and 2016 there will plenty of write ins.
Posted by: I'll take option C for a 1000 Alex at January 13, 2014 09:11 AM (nkPV9)
Posted by: troyriser at January 13, 2014 01:07 PM (gNlvW)
I would feel the same except his opponent was Obama.
Posted by: polynikes at January 13, 2014 09:12 AM (m2CN7)
As for Christie...he's so damn good at this politics thing. It's just too bad that he's utterly unelectable anywhere outside of Jersey.
Posted by: joncelli at January 13, 2014 09:13 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: exdem13 at January 13, 2014 09:14 AM (lJaja)
Folks, incrementalism regarding government spending and debt accumulation is not going to turn the Titanic around and neither will the idea that more moderate GOP'ers seats in Congress will translate to anything other than tinkering around the edges.
The iceberg of government spending and debt is right in front of the ship of state. Anything other than reverse engines full speed will only result in a kindler, gentler, collision that probably sinks the ship of state faster through its shredding of the social fabric of the nation. A full on collision might wake people up in time to save most of the ship when the immovable iceberg of debt is met by the irresistible force of government spending and regulation.
If Christie happens to be the 2016 nominee versus Hillary, I just do not know what I will do. Voting Third Party won't prevent the burn but neither will voting for Christie who at best might delay it a year or two. OTOH, Hillary might actually accelerate the ship of state into the iceberg and go down with the ship along with many Democrat Leftists. However, if Christie is captain when the ship hits the berg--GOP will be destroyed and Christie hits the lifeboats ahead of women and children and becomes a Independent favoring Democrat or even change parties in the White House (see Lincoln's experiment in 1864 with the National Union Party).
Sigh. Despair is a sin but just Let is Burn is so Tempting because it does not require any action by myself. Rebuilding a sustainable government requires changing the political attitudes and cations of a majority of voters AND the ruling class. Sisyphus never had it so good--he just had to deal with one boulder and one hill.
Posted by: wg at January 13, 2014 09:14 AM (qsXss)
Not voting is also a choice. If you wish to make sure that everyone actually goes to polls on election day, then there must be a reason for them to go.
Flawed logic. Does that choice prevent someone from being elected? No, then its not a choice in the election.
Posted by: polynikes at January 13, 2014 09:15 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: sven10077 at January 13, 2014 09:15 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: JoeyBagels at January 13, 2014 09:16 AM (POoYc)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at January 13, 2014 09:16 AM (U1Tts)
Posted by: Daybrother at January 13, 2014 09:16 AM (oCZT9)
Dumbass.
1) That's the favor you called in after the ball-cupping on the beach? That's all you got?
2) And you're stupid enough--this late in the game--to think that the WH will (a) fess up or (b) not have a "unnamed staffer down in the basement that approved it" ready to throw under the bus?
This guy gets stupider and stupider.
No wonder the Gentry GOP love him.
Posted by: RoyalOil at January 13, 2014 09:16 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: wg at January 13, 2014 09:17 AM (qsXss)
Posted by: Jon in TX at January 13, 2014 09:17 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: West at January 13, 2014 09:17 AM (1Rgee)
Posted by: kbdabear at January 13, 2014 09:17 AM (aTXUx)
Posted by: polynikes at January 13, 2014 09:18 AM (m2CN7)
However, to Ted Kennedy's credit, he is dead, and couldn't do any more harm than he already has done. Point of order: do dead people get to keep casting votes in the Senate if they're Democrats?
Posted by: [/i] [/s] [/u] [/b] An Observation at January 13, 2014 09:18 AM (ylhEn)
Posted by: blindside at January 13, 2014 09:18 AM (WzWmY)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 13, 2014 01:02 PM (Ttj5v)
well, at least that would mean that the GOP has actually found a hill
Posted by: The Dude at January 13, 2014 09:19 AM (vJdyz)
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at January 13, 2014 09:19 AM (il1Hy)
You do realize that after 30 days I'll have to charge you rent.
Posted by: The Barrel at January 13, 2014 09:19 AM (YEelc)
"Continues to be unpopular"? With whom--the Media, Liberals, DC Republicans?
Conservatism is very popular at the national level.
Posted by: Null at January 13, 2014 09:19 AM (xjpRj)
Posted by: JoeyBagels at January 13, 2014 09:19 AM (POoYc)
Do you know where I can get some of the good monkey crack? Asking for a friend.
Posted by: Chim-Chim at January 13, 2014 09:19 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Comrade Arthur at January 13, 2014 09:20 AM (h53OH)
Posted by: Valiant at January 13, 2014 09:20 AM (aFxlY)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at January 13, 2014 01:16 PM (U1Tts)
What's the false choice?
Posted by: polynikes at January 13, 2014 09:20 AM (m2CN7)
No. A thousand times no. He lost many conservative's support for reasons expressed a thousand times on this blog and several times on this thread. Posted by: Burn the Witch
I disagree,I think 90% of the outrage was from that moment. The other stuff was mainly inside baseball. I'd love to see some Christie favorability polls before and after that moment among Republicans. It was similar to Rubio after he pushed amnesty.
And I'm not saying it's a completely stupid reason to loathe him, I completely get it, it was incredibly selfish.
I'm just saying that's a dumb reason for conservatives to take their ball and go home and actually relish the idea of Hillary winning just so you can flip the bird.
Posted by: McAdams at January 13, 2014 09:20 AM (iq3N/)
Posted by: Mandrake at January 13, 2014 09:20 AM (Cs2tJ)
Posted by: An Observation at January 13, 2014 01:18 PM (ylhEn)
Sure. Robert Byrd did it for years.
Posted by: joncelli at January 13, 2014 09:21 AM (RD7QR)
Double down and run somebody else like him next time around?
Sounds like a winning plan to me!
Posted by: GOP at January 13, 2014 01:03 PM (oFCZn)
People didn't like the caricature of Romney as White-Bread Super Rich Asshole Who Doesn't Give A Damn About People Like Me And Hates Big Bird. Oh, and women didn't like the guy in the TV ad that said over and over again he would "repeal Roe V. Wade" while frolicking around with his five sons.
The reason the MSM are going after Christie so hard now is that they know they can't caricature him like they did Romney.
Anyone who thinks the next campaign, or any Presidential election from now on is actually going to be about issues or policy, you need to get your head out of the sand.
Posted by: rockmom at January 13, 2014 09:21 AM (Q4elb)
Working that for ya!
Posted by: ACA Employer Mandate at January 13, 2014 09:21 AM (YEelc)
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at January 13, 2014 09:22 AM (il1Hy)
Posted by: JoeyBagels at January 13, 2014 09:22 AM (POoYc)
Posted by: Chim-Chim at January 13, 2014 01:19 PM (RD7QR)"
That question just might be misinterpreted. Just sayin'.
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0in;
mso-para-margin-right:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0in;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
Posted by: West at January 13, 2014 09:22 AM (1Rgee)
I will never understand this logic. I understand that your choices are between bad and worse but not voting changes nothing. One of the two will be elected. If you think electing a Republican will be worse in the long run then vote for the Democrat. You should always be part of the process until there is no process.
Posted by: polynikes at January 13, 2014 01:06 PM (m2CN7)
Recent history has shown that voting for the GOP-favored candidate changes nothing. Your logic fails.
Posted by: [/i]KG at January 13, 2014 09:24 AM (p7BzH)
*sigh* I'll get the receipt book ready, looks like you'll be here a while.
Posted by: The Barrel at January 13, 2014 09:24 AM (YEelc)
Posted by: JoeyBagels at January 13, 2014 09:24 AM (POoYc)
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at January 13, 2014 09:25 AM (il1Hy)
Posted by: bonhomme at January 13, 2014 01:09 PM (o4Xc4)
That is true, so I guess I should really have simply said "Republican", since that brand has nothing to do with conservatism, or even libertarianism, anymore. If it ever really did.
Posted by: [/i]KG at January 13, 2014 09:26 AM (p7BzH)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at January 13, 2014 09:26 AM (U1Tts)
*sigh* I'll get the receipt book ready, looks like you'll be here a while."
Obama's goin' t' pay my rent!
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0in;
mso-para-margin-right:0in;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0in;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}
Posted by: West at January 13, 2014 09:27 AM (1Rgee)
Posted by: JoeyBagels at January 13, 2014 01:16 PM (POoYc)
They don't vote for Republicans either. So where does that leave us?
Posted by: [/i]KG at January 13, 2014 09:27 AM (p7BzH)
Posted by: joanne at January 13, 2014 09:28 AM (s/quq)
Posted by: KG at January 13, 2014 01:24 PM (p7BzH)
29 Republican Governors and control of the House. Obama is the only example and its only one.
Posted by: polynikes at January 13, 2014 09:28 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, still chilly at January 13, 2014 09:28 AM (naUcP)
I'll write in a my choice for POTUS in 2016.
Posted by: I'll take option C for a 1000 Alex at January 13, 2014 09:29 AM (nkPV9)
Posted by: JoeyBagels at January 13, 2014 09:29 AM (POoYc)
Posted by: polynikes at January 13, 2014 01:28 PM (m2CN7)
We are talking about the Presidency. Don't move the goalposts.
Posted by: [/i]KG at January 13, 2014 09:29 AM (p7BzH)
Posted by: Brother Cavil, still chilly at January 13, 2014 09:30 AM (naUcP)
That's what you think...
Posted by: Karl Rove at January 13, 2014 09:31 AM (1Rgee)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at January 13, 2014 01:26 PM (U1Tts)
I know we have ACA. I don't know if we would have Amnesty. Didn't have it in two Bush terms. Anyway good to know you would rather Obama than McCain.
Posted by: polynikes at January 13, 2014 09:31 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Daybrother at January 13, 2014 09:33 AM (Os78Y)
400 Because Amnesty is not really a big deal, right?
Posted by: Burn the Witch at January 13, 2014 01:26 PM (U1Tts)
I know we have ACA. I don't know if we would have Amnesty. Didn't have it in two Bush terms. Anyway good to know you would rather Obama than McCain.
Not for lack of trying. Bush tried to pass amnesty, but fortunately, conservatives lit up the phone lines and threatened every representative and senator. Got enough to not vote for it to kill it.
Posted by: Jon in TX at January 13, 2014 09:34 AM (PYAXX)
Conservatives have to start winning mayoral races and congressional races and school board races.
--------
Food for thought...
The VA GOP candidate for governor was a great conservative who was punished by the Establishment wing of the party because he didn't wait his turn before standing for office by honoring a deal he had no part in. As such those moneyed Establishment types who continually insist that conservatives cross their principles and vote for squishes withheld support and let that candidate get painted as a wacko religious zealot.
In other words, it's nice to say conservatives need to start winning, but it's kind of hard when elements of your own party actively work against you.
Posted by: @JohnTant at January 13, 2014 09:35 AM (PFy0L)
Posted by: JoeyBagels at January 13, 2014 09:36 AM (POoYc)
I think the gop is counting chickens way too early. they are already dreaming of a bigger majority in the house and taking a bare majority in the senate.
Election day shock will be priceless.
Posted by: I'll take option C for a 1000 Alex at January 13, 2014 09:37 AM (nkPV9)
Posted by: akula51[/b][/i][/s] at January 13, 2014 09:37 AM (ZcS8q)
Posted by: Frank Lautenberg at January 13, 2014 09:41 AM (QoV2v)
Posted by: Shoot Me at January 13, 2014 09:44 AM (qiXMt)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale
---------------------------------------
Well, he did say he agrees with democrats on 98% of the issues, so there's that.
Posted by: moose at January 13, 2014 09:47 AM (ZvLh8)
An example, I have a problem with Christie because he's not an "NRA Republican", I'm big on the 2nd Amnendment. He's basically for the status quo when it comes to gun laws in Jersey, but to my knowledge has not passed any new gun laws.
That's till a whole lot better than the Clintons who we've seen has a real hard on for going after guns and actually passed the Assault Weapons ban. So a Christie Presidency would probably be a more federalist approach to new gun laws, and we know what the Clinton approach will be.
So to say "they're both the same" is bullshit if you actually care about these issues.
Posted by: McAdams at January 13, 2014 09:52 AM (iq3N/)
Posted by: gladys at January 13, 2014 09:56 AM (vE0fx)
Haven't met a big government progressive repub yet that is not more than happy to exercise whatever levers of power that are available.
Posted by: I'll take option C for a 1000 Alex at January 13, 2014 10:01 AM (nkPV9)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at January 13, 2014 10:02 AM (itCai)
Posted by: NotImpressed at January 13, 2014 10:02 AM (3h0SS)
Haven't met a big government progressive repub yet that is not more than happy to exercise whatever levers of power that are available.
Posted by: I'll take option C
You don't think he could do that right now with a Democrat legislature in New Jersey?
Posted by: McAdams at January 13, 2014 10:04 AM (iq3N/)
Posted by: gnozo at January 13, 2014 10:05 AM (nTd0a)
Sure he would, if it meant he would survive the next reelction attempt.
That is doubtful though.
Posted by: I'll take option C for a 1000 Alex at January 13, 2014 10:14 AM (nkPV9)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at January 13, 2014 10:16 AM (5xmd7)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at January 13, 2014 10:19 AM (Y92Nd)
He got cozy with El Presidente, and now it looks like they're throwing him under the bus for a cheap distraction. I can't feel sorry for him.
Posted by: RandyW. at January 13, 2014 10:19 AM (Tq1Lm)
But at least we'd be able to go after our guys (Romney, McCain) on issues like Amnesty without being labeled a racist...
-----
Shut up, you wacko birdsh!!!!
Posted by: John McQueeg at January 13, 2014 10:21 AM (YmPwQ)
More than likely rove is behind this flap. He probably has decided that prince jebward will be the man. Run the old double switch, pump the fat man up until he cant be taken down any further.
Then throw another bush our way.
Posted by: I'll take option C for a 1000 Alex at January 13, 2014 10:27 AM (nkPV9)
Yeah, "let" him get painted. And let's not forget that when the Dems weren't hitting Cucinelli for his own law, they were hitting him for the Tea Party approved shut down.
"Let" him. I love this argument that people in government shouldn't be held responsible for their own choices.
Conservatives have a choice between doing what's hard and likely unrewarding, and doing what's easy. Easy is sitting on your ass, pounding your fist, and blaming the Establishment.
Posted by: Shoot Me at January 13, 2014 10:27 AM (qiXMt)
"Please show an election that was WON campaigning on 'I'm not as bad as the other guy'?"
I think that this is actually how Obama beat Romney.
Posted by: Troll Feeder at January 13, 2014 10:29 AM (aBrL8)
Oddly enough, I was less than impressed by the Fat Jersey Fuck.
"I could see, for example, a scenario in which conservatism continues to be unpopular at the national level, and Christie (or a similar RINO) might be our only plausible vehicle for winning the White House." — Sure, it didn't work twice before. Bound to work this time.
I wonder if Rove doesn't actually believe this nonsense, as much as he actually believes anything, or if this is just something he's throwing out to try and reassure his money men that the RNC won't make them end up running a third Bush for the White House.
Posted by: Judgmental White Person at January 13, 2014 10:29 AM (XO6WW)
Posted by: sven10077 at January 13, 2014 10:29 AM (TE35l)
You keep doing what is likely all you want.
Myself, never wasting a vote on another proggie repub again. Thing is there are millions like me and more going this direction every day. Your direction is shrinking and it is shrinking fast.
I give the repubs one last POTUS election cycle before they become irrelevant.
Posted by: I'll take option C for a 1000 Alex at January 13, 2014 10:34 AM (nkPV9)
Posted by: Deety at January 13, 2014 10:36 AM (daK3O)
Posted by: naturalfake at January 13, 2014 10:38 AM (0cMkb)
Looking at any possible "non-Progressive" candidates (if you can find any), we are sooooo hosed.
Posted by: 1bulwetweft - doom, Doom, and MORE DOOM at January 13, 2014 10:39 AM (d2CZd)
I did what was hard, and unrewarding. Every four years since the 2000 election. I gave time and money to Bush, McCain, and Romney. All I got was a facefull of piss and a bunch of you guys telling me it's raining.
Never again.
Posted by: Biff Boffo at January 13, 2014 10:40 AM (YmPwQ)
Posted by: SocietyIs2Blame at January 13, 2014 10:51 AM (il1Hy)
Posted by: Jorge at January 13, 2014 10:57 AM (ZRPb2)
Posted by: sexypig at January 13, 2014 11:00 AM (dZQh7)
I disagree. Christie has a very good chance of getting the nomination. Becoming POTUS is a whole different story.
Posted by: I'll take option C for a 1000 Alex at January 13, 2014 11:01 AM (nkPV9)
Posted by: Travis McGee's Houseboat Wifi at January 13, 2014 11:02 AM (Qm24A)
Posted by: Blake at January 13, 2014 11:06 AM (WuGBT)
Because they love him thats why. Wait until POTUS season opens up and watch who they endorse and cheer for. They may claim to be conservative but the vast majority of so called "right wing bloggers" will go for the rino over a conservative any day of the week.
Posted by: I'll take option C for a 1000 Alex at January 13, 2014 11:07 AM (nkPV9)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 13, 2014 12:45 PM (DmNpO)
If you are talking about html school, I agree. Although, this is the only site where I comment that I have any problems whatsoever. I'd say it is more a problem of this site, which is not user friendly at all for comments.
If you are talking about something else, I have no idea what you are talking about - so you need to "point at it".
Posted by: monkeytoe at January 13, 2014 11:12 AM (sOx93)
TL;DR
Showing either my age, my technology knowledge lack, or my not spending enough time in the comments here - - I have no idea what this means.
Posted by: monkeytoe at January 13, 2014 11:13 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at January 13, 2014 11:14 AM (itCai)
No, Virginia! A thousand times, No!
Posted by: WaitingForMartel at January 13, 2014 11:16 AM (BYSrJ)
" The other guys are worse isn't enough anymore"
The other guys aren't worse anymore. *Rove scrolls through contacts, seeing if he still has Huntsman's phone number*
Posted by: Richard McEnroe at January 13, 2014 11:16 AM (XO6WW)
Posted by: redware at January 13, 2014 11:25 AM (gc2+4)
Posted by: gekkobear at January 13, 2014 11:33 AM (HZiic)
"The other guys are worse isn't enough anymore"
The other guys aren't worse anymore. *Rove scrolls through contacts, seeing if he still has Huntsman's phone number*
Posted by: Richard McEnroe at January 13, 2014 03:16 PM (XO6WW)
Good point. Those who keep saying we need to support the GOP no matter what, need to come up with some argument as to why we should vote FOR the GOP rather than the same tired argument that allegedly the other side is so much worse.
Yes, we know democrats are bad. But, the problem you continue to ignore is that republicans are just as bad. Republicans enable the democrats by consolidating all leftist gains and giving those leftist policies bi-partisan cover. Growth of gov't? check. Amnesty? check. Spending? Check.
The point I continue to pound on is what, exactly, do conservatives have to show for support of the GOP over the last 30 years? Gov't has increased. Spending has increased. Socialism has increased. And that is with the GOP controlling all branches of gov't from 2000 to 2006 - during which time not one conservative thing was accomplished (aside, perhaps for tax cuts - however, I am not so certain "tax cuts" are truly conservative when combined with massive new deficit spending and debt. That does not seem like much of a conservative "victory" to me).
The reality is that the GOP was held together from 1980 - 1992 by the Cold War. We won the Cold War, but at the expense of just about everything else (particularly the culture, while we were winning the Cold War the left completely took over the culture). Not sure that was as great a victory as we think.
In 1992 - 2000, opposition to Clinton mostly held the coalition together as it floundered about trying to figure out what the coalition was going to look like going forward.
Between 2000 and 2006, the War on Terror took over for the Cold War as holding the GOP coalition together (hawks, fiscal conservatives, social conservatives, small gov't conservatives and repubricats [Romney like republican big-gov't technocrats]).
the War on Terror no longer holds the coalition together.
Posted by: monkeytoe at January 13, 2014 11:37 AM (sOx93)
Too Long, Didn't Read
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at January 13, 2014 03:29 PM (5xmd7)
Interesting. I generally don't comment on things I did not read, so never would have guessed it. Not really sure what the point of the comment is. That a few paragraphs is too complicated for some people to get through? I'm certainly not aiming at those to insipid to read a few paragraphs. I doubt they'd understand it anyway. Or is the point of that comment that you only want short, pithy snark to be included in comments? You are aggrieved when someone writes something other than what can be found in a text or tweet?
I love the idea that someone doesn't bother to read something - which is of course fine, I don't read every comment either - but then feels it's necessary to tell the world that one did not read the comment fascinating. Talk about a new level of naval gazing. "Hey - look at me - I didn't read that other guy's comment because it was 4 paragraphs!!".
Posted by: monkeytoe at January 13, 2014 11:43 AM (sOx93)
We should support a RINO because of SCOTUS noms. We need another Roberts.
*barf*
Posted by: Fen at January 13, 2014 11:49 AM (a422o)
That sucks. How are Conservatives going to fix that? Oh yeah, it has no friggen idea so it's just posturing.
"The other guys are worse isn't enough anymore. Read Drew's piece..."
How about True Cons read Ace when he tells them the truth about the Electorate? Nah, because then we might have to start pointing fingers at things that aren't The Establishment, or find out that RINO hunting isn't a one-way street, and we can't have that.
"Find a candidate who can move the needle to the right, not just slow the shift to the left (if even that)."
Or we could find an Eisenhower who repaired the Right's image after Hoover? Nah, it's always All or Nothing.
Posted by: Shoot Me at January 13, 2014 11:57 AM (qiXMt)
Posted by: Shoot Me at January 13, 2014 03:57 PM (qiXMt)
And what, pray tell, is the truth about the electorate?
You say "find a candidate who moves the needle to the right" - as if every candidate doesn't run as far more conservative than they act in office.
You seem to not understand facts and data. OK - explain this to me. Almost every GOP incumbent ran on opposing any form of amnesty. Yet the GOP wants to push amnesty through.
How do you - being so much smarter and more reality based than everyone else who is a "purist" - square that circle? I know, because you believe there is no "establishment" and that the GOP only does what we the voters want, it must mean that we the GOP voters want right? Except, why then do they run opposing amnesty? And polls of GOP voters show GOP voters opposing any form of amnesty.
that is but one example of many. Show me the GOP incumbent that ran on increasing spending? they don't, they run for decreasing spending. Yet, most of them vote for increasing spending and almost none vote for decreasing spending.
it's the same old argument from you - "purists" need to shut up and vote for the GOP because that's the best we'll ever get and therefore just stop wanting any conservative outcomes".
I don't get why you pretend to be a conservative. You obviously don't want to see any conservative outcomes and become angry at the thought of anyone pursuing conservative outcomes.
Posted by: monkeytoe at January 13, 2014 12:06 PM (sOx93)
Posted by: Auntie M at January 13, 2014 12:11 PM (AIC5Z)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at January 13, 2014 12:16 PM (5xmd7)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at January 13, 2014 12:18 PM (5xmd7)
The thing about the tea party is they haven't lost hope yet. They're not beat before they've started.
Posted by: venus velvet at January 13, 2014 12:31 PM (YyfOB)
I don't even need that. The fact that his underlings were so brazen about it tells me Christie has been aware of this mentality for some time, probably party to conversations around the water cooler re sticking it to his enemies.
Its like coming home 15 mins early to find your wife in bed with some guy and believing her when she says "it was the first and only time". Really? The reason they got caught was because they were careless. They've been getting away with it for so long that they grew complacent - timing it to within 15 mins of your expected return instead of a few hours prior.
Christie knew. Maybe not of this particular instance, but of others. His staff was arrogant about it b/c they knew their boss supported their viewpoint.
Posted by: Fen at January 13, 2014 02:00 PM (a422o)
Posted by: cackfinger at January 13, 2014 04:01 PM (OsCtd)
Posted by: cackfinger at January 13, 2014 04:04 PM (OsCtd)
Posted by: MlR at January 13, 2014 04:29 PM (evbjR)
Posted by: rabidfox at January 13, 2014 05:29 PM (COIkl)
Posted by: Gryph at January 13, 2014 11:18 PM (Lljg2)
Posted by: burt at January 14, 2014 08:47 AM (1+kJ5)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3334 seconds, 595 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: lurky lu at January 13, 2014 08:07 AM (DjLh9)