February 26, 2014
— Ace Via @benk84 (follow him on twitter) and his Morning Dump, Barone's short piece is worth reading in full.
The result [of state concealed-carry legislation and Heller] has been that over the years the entire nation has become carry-concealed-weapons territory, as shown in a neat graphic in a Volokh Conspiracy blog post by Dave Kopel. Back in 1987, some people, myself included, worried that such laws would lead to frequent shootouts on the streets arising from traffic altercations and the like. That has not happened -- something we can be sure of since the mainstream media would be delighted to headline such events.To the contrary, violent crime rates have declined drastically during the last quarter-century....
One lesson, I think, is that responsible citizens tend to behave like responsible citizens, even if — or perhaps especially if — they’re armed. Another lesson is that the national political dialogue can be totally irrelevant to what really happens in American life.
Anytime someone opposes a policy, they cry about the "parade of horribles" that will flow from it. In the case of guns, those horribles have always included the specter of Wild West shootouts breaking out all over the place. While there have in fact been two well-known bad shootings (Dunn, the Popcorn Vigilante) and one legal shooting which was nevertheless controversial (Zimmerman), the facts have not been kind to this theory of America Turned Dodge City.
Freedom is always scary. Freedom always carries with it the risk that people will use that freedom for bad ends. That's why it's been so easy, over 200 years, to erode and repeal the freedoms we began with.
Those against freedom prey on this fear and overstate it. And they fight like the Dickens to keep even an experimental program in freedom in a single state from going forward, because they fear the actual facts -- the policy in actual practice -- will not support their Narrative of Fear.
As a hypothetical matter, you could always, without being quite disproven, postulate that if law-abiding citizens were armed with guns, those law-abiding citizens would suddenly become reckless, angry vigilantes just looking for an excuse to plug someone.
But when it's no longer hypothetical -- when there's a factual record to go on -- it's harder to make this case.
Crucial to this argument's effectiveness is "Otherization." People are willing to believe the absolute worst about People Not Like Us. If you can portray gun-owners as exotic and strange -- Not Like Us -- the public will be willing, and maybe even eager, to believe that possession of a weapon will turn your average law-abiding, mortgage-paying, soccer-practice-ferrying United States Citizen into a hotheaded kill machine.
This argument was always restrained by the fact that so many Americans owned guns, and so many law-abiding American citizens continued abiding the law even in a state of, as the gun controllers would call it, Armed and Dangerous Murder Ecstasy. But a great number of people did not own guns, and so were willing to believe gun ownership was weird, and any gun owner was therefore weird, and who can trust a gun in the hands of a weirdo?
As more people own guns and carry them responsibly, this "weirdness" message so beloved by the gun controllers grows weaker and weaker. We're probably at the good tipping point now, or at least very close to it.
Posted by: Ace at
06:41 AM
| Comments (266)
Post contains 600 words, total size 4 kb.
It's almost like they get off on being wrong.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at February 26, 2014 06:45 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2014 06:46 AM (zqvg6)
Posted by: ace at February 26, 2014 06:46 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Angel with a sword at February 26, 2014 06:46 AM (hpgw1)
I basically said that to me, there's no debate. A person's right to self defense is inviolable. Therefore, they are entitled to use any weapon that may be used against them, and at any location that they may need to make such a defense.
To nibble around the edges of that is to claim the right doesn't really exist.
It is not worth discussing the issue with anyone who thinks that there is nuance to the right of self-defense.
Posted by: grognard at February 26, 2014 06:47 AM (/29Nl)
U.S. Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., and Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., have been pulled into a lawsuit between two local chapters of the Service Employees International Union, which represent health care workers, and nursing homes. At issue is whether a campaign to pressure the management of the nursing homes during labor disputes crossed the line into extortion.
There is no allegation that DeLauro or Blumenthal have done anything criminal [yet], and the most recent complaint by the nursing home companies, filed in December, doesnÂ’t suggest that either politician has done anything wrong.
But both lawmakers are now in the uncomfortable situation of being deposed by lawyers representing the nursing homes and are forced to provide a wide array of documents relating to their interactions with the SEIU.
Posted by: Joe Biden at February 26, 2014 06:47 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: Roy at February 26, 2014 06:47 AM (VndSC)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 26, 2014 06:48 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: awkward davies at February 26, 2014 06:48 AM (whqez)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 26, 2014 06:49 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 26, 2014 06:50 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: RobM1981 at February 26, 2014 06:50 AM (zurJC)
Posted by: Robert Byrd at February 26, 2014 06:51 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 26, 2014 06:51 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: ace at February 26, 2014 06:51 AM (/FnUH)
I assume you have seen the Ukraine Gun Owners Association's drive for a 2nd Amendment-like law.
If not: http://tinyurl.com/m67drp8
[Breitbart link]
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at February 26, 2014 06:52 AM (QFxY5)
Funny isn't it, how twisted it all is. Smoking pot = Ok! Smoking cigarettes= oh noes!... the children! Execute capitol felons = No no! Abortion of innocent ( by definition) baby, ok and totally, don't judge the Mother..ever! ..... and I could go on and on..
I'm sick of it. I want the madness to stop, but am more resigned to it just keep getting more bizarre every freaking year until we get hauled off to our new fancy camps to live... for our own good of course.
Posted by: Yip at February 26, 2014 06:52 AM (/jHWN)
Posted by: AZ Hi Desert (All my Hate cannot be found) at February 26, 2014 06:52 AM (O9qtX)
Posted by: ace at February 26, 2014 06:53 AM (/FnUH)
Why are sidebar stories now getting multiple posts? Last night it was CINCPAC's WWII war diaries and now something in Electra, TX.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 26, 2014 06:53 AM (dDf+N)
Posted by: maddogg at February 26, 2014 06:53 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at February 26, 2014 06:53 AM (gBnkX)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at February 26, 2014 06:53 AM (HsTG8)
I must have missed the NRA suing Moms Demand Attention to force them to carry.
Posted by: HR, watching scripts run at February 26, 2014 06:53 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: Piers Morgan at February 26, 2014 06:54 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Jim Scrummy at February 26, 2014 06:54 AM (6T8Ay)
Posted by: ace at February 26, 2014 06:54 AM (/FnUH)
Facts cannot be allowed to get in teh way of a good scary story!
Blood! Will flow from the unholy altars of assault pistol with the shoulder thingy that flips up and down! The blood of the man slaughtered in teh parking lot because he left his turn signal on too long!
Posted by: Mikey NTH - The Winter of Discontent will End! The Flowers of Fury will be here for Spring Planting at February 26, 2014 06:54 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: Mooch at February 26, 2014 06:55 AM (611Rk)
Posted by: Boss Moss at February 26, 2014 06:55 AM (6bMeY)
8: "Gun ownership is getting like gay marriage. It's not as scary once you actually know about actual situations and are personally involved."
You seem to be operating under the false premise that anyone is afraid of gay "marriage".
Posted by: Azenogoth (Freedom or Fire) Est. 1836 at February 26, 2014 06:55 AM (v6cwT)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 26, 2014 06:55 AM (Zx2Zj)
Posted by: backhoe at February 26, 2014 06:55 AM (ULH4o)
Posted by: maddogg at February 26, 2014 10:53 AM (xWW96)
^^ THIS times TRILLION ^^
Posted by: Sherry McEvil, Stiletto Corsettes, think mink. at February 26, 2014 06:55 AM (kXoT0)
Posted by: Mindy at February 26, 2014 06:56 AM (mQwL2)
Posted by: awkward davies at February 26, 2014 06:56 AM (whqez)
Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2014 06:56 AM (zqvg6)
For a Moron.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at February 26, 2014 10:49 AM (QFxY5)
Why thank you.
I've just come to the conclusion that it's really really damn hard to argue against the right to self defense.
Once you get someone to admit they are for it, you can dismantle their nuanced objections on the edges.
Posted by: grognard at February 26, 2014 06:56 AM (/29Nl)
average law-abiding, mortgage-paying, soccer-practice-ferrying United States Citizen into a hotheaded kill machine.
Also known as, "Not the typical Demonrat voter."
With the exception of the fucking "soccer moms."
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/b][/i] at February 26, 2014 06:56 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Boss Moss at February 26, 2014 06:57 AM (6bMeY)
Maybe we should instead hammer home how in state run societies they will be rationed to one roll of toilet paper a month.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 26, 2014 06:57 AM (dDf+N)
Posted by: Beagle at February 26, 2014 06:57 AM (sOtz/)
Unfortunately those cities have lots of voters and an entrenched progressive political hierarchy. It will be a generation before that can change...if ever.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at February 26, 2014 06:57 AM (QFxY5)
The left will NEVER give up on gun control. It isn't the guns that scare them. Its the hard on they get from the "control" part.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 26, 2014 06:57 AM (T2V/1)
Thanks morons.
Posted by: Gidget at February 26, 2014 06:58 AM (tfg7i)
Posted by: Bill at February 26, 2014 06:58 AM (uvyrw)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 26, 2014 06:58 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 26, 2014 06:59 AM (dDf+N)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 26, 2014 10:53 AM (dDf+N)
The Cobs forgot the "No fapping while posting rule".
Posted by: Larsen E .Whipsnade at February 26, 2014 06:59 AM (rXcBX)
MWR, I came across the perfect CC weapon for moronettes today. Perfect.
http://tinyurl.com/22v6wsz
Posted by: maddogg at February 26, 2014 06:59 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Judge Pug at February 26, 2014 06:59 AM (6Nj7A)
Posted by: ace at February 26, 2014 07:00 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at February 26, 2014 07:01 AM (olDqf)
Posted by: Lord Barry the Common at February 26, 2014 07:01 AM (KQp38)
Posted by: t-bird at February 26, 2014 07:01 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/b][/i] at February 26, 2014 07:01 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: See You Next Tuesday at February 26, 2014 07:02 AM (DAevm)
Posted by: grognard at February 26, 2014 10:56 AM (/29Nl)
It's the margins that are vitally important, as you point out.
If I can't carry into NYC to protect myself, then what's the point? I live in an extremely safe part of the metro area, and while I would love to carry, it is not a huge safety issue (it is however a huge freedom issue).
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at February 26, 2014 07:02 AM (QFxY5)
46: "Guns being legal does not change the equation in any meaningful way."
Incorrect. The threat of death or grevious harm from being shot by a home owner is much more certain than the chances of getting caught, convicted, and actually sentenced by the state.
Break into my home and see if your bleeding heart lawyer can get you off the sentence I will impose within my domain...
Posted by: Azenogoth (Freedom or Fire) Est. 1836 at February 26, 2014 07:02 AM (v6cwT)
Posted by: Votermom at February 26, 2014 07:02 AM (GSIDW)
Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2014 07:02 AM (zqvg6)
Posted by: sven10077 at February 26, 2014 07:02 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: DangerGirl and her Sanity Prod (tm) at February 26, 2014 07:02 AM (0MVzQ)
Posted by: ace at February 26, 2014 07:03 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Judge Pug at February 26, 2014 07:03 AM (6Nj7A)
You know there used to be claim we made on the right: "We look for converts, the left looks for heretics."
I don't get the negative attitude towards someone making you case -- "late" or not.
Posted by: ace at February 26, 2014 11:00 AM (/FnUH)
That was not meant to be anger Ace, sorry if it looks that way perhaps I could have worded it different. Just saying that there have been published articles and statistics on this for a LONG time.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 26, 2014 07:03 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2014 07:04 AM (zqvg6)
Posted by: maddogg at February 26, 2014 07:04 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: willow at February 26, 2014 07:04 AM (nqBYe)
why the anger?
You know there used to be claim we made on the right: "We look for converts, the left looks for heretics."
I don't get the negative attitude towards someone making you case -- "late" or not.
Posted by: ace at February 26, 2014 11:00 AM (/FnUH)
Barone never jumps the gun on things before all the data is examined; and he's talking about where the public is, which is different from what Vic referenced. When I read Barone I know he's giving me the straight info with no ideological axe to grind.
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 26, 2014 07:04 AM (+ywjg)
Suck it Piers
Posted by: phreshone at February 26, 2014 07:04 AM (Q6pxP)
51: "Until Aunty Entity controls BarterTownÂ… "
And then the producers reminds her..."Who run Bartertown?"
Posted by: Azenogoth (Freedom or Fire) Est. 1836 at February 26, 2014 07:04 AM (OJn3e)
Posted by: ace at February 26, 2014 07:04 AM (/FnUH)
The ATF found someone who was mentally retard. Then they convinced him to do as they told him to do. Then they arrested him for doing what they told him. In a two minute interview the judge figured out he was not playing with a full deck. Luckily for him, the judge threw out the case and turned on the
ATF. Federal employees: A real bunch of winners!
Posted by: burt at February 26, 2014 07:04 AM (1+kJ5)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at February 26, 2014 07:04 AM (7GJd1)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 26, 2014 07:05 AM (dDf+N)
Posted by: zombie at February 26, 2014 07:05 AM (+cx5n)
Posted by: Ambassador Stevens at February 26, 2014 07:05 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: Beagle at February 26, 2014 07:05 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 26, 2014 07:06 AM (Zx2Zj)
Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2014 07:06 AM (zqvg6)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 26, 2014 07:07 AM (dDf+N)
Posted by: Boss Moss at February 26, 2014 07:07 AM (6bMeY)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 26, 2014 07:07 AM (nzKvP)
Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2014 07:07 AM (zqvg6)
So, our exalted Attorney General can tell state Attorneys General that they aren't required to enforce laws they don't agree with. Could he not also say that an AG CAN choose to prosecute despite laws saying they can't? Let's say, for example, a state allows concealed carry, but the AG thinks that they shouldn't. So someone's arrested for carrying a concealed weapon, and the AG says, "Oh, well, we know that we have a law on the books that says this is okay, but I don't agree with that law."
Yes, I realize that's a mindblowing scenario. Five years ago I wouldn't have given it a passing thought. Today? I'm investing in tin foil for all the hats I'm making.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/b][/i] at February 26, 2014 07:08 AM (4df7R)
- There are tens of millions of people who consider self-defense to be an inviolable right. It is not negotiable.
- Of those tens of millions, there are a few million willing to fight to the death for that right.
- If you lend your support to government infringing on this right, you will be considered an enemy.
- Your calculus into a "solution" had better take that into account, because there will be a terrible price, and these people aren't going to stop at fighting back against only those who come to the doors to confiscate.
Usually sobers things up.
Posted by: grognard at February 26, 2014 07:08 AM (/29Nl)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at February 26, 2014 07:08 AM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Beagle at February 26, 2014 07:08 AM (sOtz/)
I love the way liberals advocate for turning the US to Venezuela and then once you point out what Venezuela is rebut your argument with a wave off of "Oh, that can't happen here."
Why not? Guns. But they want to get rid of those too...
Posted by: Jollyroger at February 26, 2014 07:09 AM (t06LC)
Posted by: zombie at February 26, 2014 07:09 AM (+cx5n)
Posted by: See You Next Tuesday at February 26, 2014 07:09 AM (DAevm)
Posted by: Votermom at February 26, 2014 07:09 AM (GSIDW)
But depsite that due to constant pressure from the left and staking of the courts by the left, we have steadily lost ground on the second amendment.
And I don't see that changing any time soon. The corrupt Obamanites have just gone about subverting it in different directions. (Gun running to cartels; shutting down the only lead smelter, et al)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 26, 2014 07:10 AM (T2V/1)
The closer we get to the "tipping point" that Ace mentioned, the more intense the effort will be to find that one case that strikes fear into the public and reverses this development.
Posted by: CJ at February 26, 2014 07:10 AM (9KqcB)
Karl Urban as Max?
MWR would be first in line to see that movie.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 26, 2014 11:05 AM (dDf+N)
Oh HELL yes. Especially if he wore chaps. ONLY chaps.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/b][/i] at February 26, 2014 07:10 AM (4df7R)
/ok stop laughing now
Posted by: phreshone at February 26, 2014 07:10 AM (Q6pxP)
Posted by: Bane at February 26, 2014 07:10 AM (/FnUH)
82: "Karl Urban as Max?
MWR would be first in line to see that movie."
I'd buy that on bluray. But then I'm still hoping they actually release part 2 of Priest.
Posted by: Azenogoth (Freedom or Fire) Est. 1836 at February 26, 2014 07:10 AM (LJpVo)
And the reboot is listed in post-production with a 2015 release. What kind of post-production takes a year?
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 26, 2014 07:11 AM (dDf+N)
"Those against freedom prey on this fear and overstate it. And they fight like the Dickens to keep even an experimental program in freedom in a single state from going forward, because they fear the actual facts -- the policy in actual practice -- will not support their Narrative of Fear.
Except for pot. Full speed ahead!"
--------------------------------------------
Meh. There are examples in human history that show the corrosive effects drugs can have on societies. China and opium, Russia and alcohol. But there are people around who refuse to learn from the 96th kick of the mule.
Posted by: The Awkward-Turtle at February 26, 2014 07:11 AM (P7ezA)
Posted by: Mindy at February 26, 2014 07:12 AM (mQwL2)
If I can't carry into NYC to protect myself, then what's the point? I live in an extremely safe part of the metro area, and while I would love to carry, it is not a huge safety issue (it is however a huge freedom issue).
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at February 26, 2014 11:02 AM (QFxY5)
They love the the "you don't really need" it argument. The response is always
"I haven't needed it...yet." followed by
"How many TV interviews after tragic events start with 'I never thought it could happen here.'"
Posted by: grognard at February 26, 2014 07:12 AM (/29Nl)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 26, 2014 07:12 AM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: t-bird at February 26, 2014 07:12 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: AMDG at February 26, 2014 07:12 AM (t7OO0)
Which is funny when you look at what Hollywood and the video game market is targeting at teens.
Posted by: Lizzy at February 26, 2014 07:13 AM (aq/zi)
Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2014 07:13 AM (zqvg6)
Posted by: zombie at February 26, 2014 07:13 AM (+cx5n)
92: "No public employee should receive more than the minimum wage. If you can make more in the private sector do so."
Hope you like the draft.
Posted by: Azenogoth (Freedom or Fire) Est. 1836 at February 26, 2014 07:13 AM (Kh+vp)
Possession of weapon may not, but forcing socialism down our throats certainly will.
Posted by: Jean at February 26, 2014 07:13 AM (4JkHl)
Posted by: awkward davies at February 26, 2014 07:13 AM (whqez)
Posted by: zombie at February 26, 2014 07:14 AM (+cx5n)
Posted by: AMDG at February 26, 2014 07:14 AM (t7OO0)
That was not meant to be anger Ace, sorry if it looks that way perhaps I could have worded it different. Just saying that there have been published articles and statistics on this for a LONG time.
What Barone said was "I was afraid of bad consequences, they didn't materialize, now I have changed my mind". OWTTE.
That is breathtakingly rare in this culture, and refreshingly welcome to me.
Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at February 26, 2014 07:15 AM (A0sHn)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 26, 2014 07:15 AM (Zx2Zj)
Fricking NCIS for gods sake.
Posted by: Gidget at February 26, 2014 07:15 AM (tfg7i)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Rounding Error Extraordinaire at February 26, 2014 07:15 AM (YyiJ+)
Posted by: See You Next Tuesday at February 26, 2014 07:15 AM (DAevm)
Posted by: t-bird at February 26, 2014 07:16 AM (FcR7P)
Some Swiss cantons require you to bring a weapon with you to vote.
This has worked out fine for them, the rabbit people don't get to piss in the legislation.
If you are unwilling to defend the Republic from dangers, foriegn and domestic, you shouldn't really have a say in how it is run. And, just to twist the knife, the unarmed should be charged double sales tax, just to pay for their defense "free" ride.
Posted by: Kristophr at February 26, 2014 07:16 AM (c6N69)
$100 million budget and filmed in Namibia? What is wrong with shooting on the cheap in Australia?
And I hope Max still has something as wicked as his Javelin cop car. Not a four door Fiat 500.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 26, 2014 07:16 AM (dDf+N)
Posted by: RWC at February 26, 2014 07:16 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2014 07:17 AM (zqvg6)
OK, enough optimism. Bring on the suck.
Posted by: shillelagh at February 26, 2014 07:17 AM (hRzu2)
If you are unwilling to defend the Republic from dangers, foriegn and domestic, you shouldn't really have a say in how it is run. And, just to twist the knife, the unarmed should be charged double sales tax, just to pay for their defense "free" ride.
Posted by: Kristophr at February 26, 2014 11:16 AM (c6N69)
Aaaaand no.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/b][/i] at February 26, 2014 07:17 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 26, 2014 11:16 AM (dDf+N)
The leftard Mad Max would most likely resemble the crew cut 50 year old virgin in a moo moo in Demolition Man and be driving a pink prius, with flames.
Posted by: maddogg at February 26, 2014 07:18 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Abner "Call Me Abbie" Normal[/i][/b][/s][/u] at February 26, 2014 07:18 AM (qlBdX)
Posted by: Barack O'Stalin at February 26, 2014 07:18 AM (Q6pxP)
Posted by: ontherocks at February 26, 2014 07:18 AM (8AaQe)
Posted by: zombie at February 26, 2014 07:18 AM (+cx5n)
Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2014 07:18 AM (zqvg6)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 26, 2014 07:19 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2014 07:19 AM (zqvg6)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 26, 2014 07:19 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at February 26, 2014 07:19 AM (7GJd1)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit[/i][/u][/b][/s] at February 26, 2014 07:20 AM (0HooB)
"No, can I eat it?"
"No you blinking sod, because it 'ad a l'rger capacity battery."
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 26, 2014 07:20 AM (dDf+N)
Posted by: See You Next Tuesday at February 26, 2014 07:20 AM (DAevm)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 26, 2014 07:20 AM (Hx5uv)
Drafting public employees sounds like a fine idea. In fact, make a four year term a requirement to vote. You could end up doing anything from sweeping floors in a prison to serving in the military, to handling drivers licenses at the DMV.
But you will serve if you want to vote.
Roman Senators were referred to ceremonially as "Conscript Fathers" ... maybe we could expand this idea?
Posted by: Kristophr at February 26, 2014 07:20 AM (c6N69)
Posted by: Judge Pug at February 26, 2014 07:20 AM (6Nj7A)
Posted by: Jean at February 26, 2014 07:20 AM (4JkHl)
Well stated; I grew up in a household with shotguns but Father Hate kept them put away and out of sight and also put the fear of God in me if I had the thought of fucking around with them. He also took me out to shoot them when I was an early teen so I could experience the consequences of using them.
Posted by: Captain Hate at February 26, 2014 07:20 AM (+ywjg)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 26, 2014 07:21 AM (SY2Kh)
>>>What is wrong with shooting on the cheap in Australia?
Unions.
Posted by: Mr. Dave at February 26, 2014 11:19 AM (7GJd1)
And probably environmental regulations.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/b][/i] at February 26, 2014 07:21 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 26, 2014 07:21 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 26, 2014 07:21 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: phreshone at February 26, 2014 07:21 AM (Q6pxP)
Which is precisely what the Founders foresaw, and is the reason why even if there were to be a death toll from arming ourselves it would be worth the price. Simply put, we could not kill each other at a rate that would even come close to matching what socialism can produce. That is the one area where it is very efficient since every aspect of it leads to penury, starvation and violent suppression.
This is why the Tea Party scares the hell out of the left. Not only are they economically literate and unable to be bought off, but they understand what the 2nd amendment is intended to protect. How could that not scare people who intend to do us ill?
Posted by: Thatch at February 26, 2014 07:21 AM (qYvEa)
Posted by: Beagle at February 26, 2014 07:21 AM (sOtz/)
Posted by: Jean at February 26, 2014 07:21 AM (4JkHl)
A silly example, I know, but, while watching the last episode of Blacklist (which, as I mentioned earlier, also showed a picture of Allen West and another of Ted Cruz hobnobbing with the main villain ), someone was carrying a weapon in a gas station store and tried to use it to stop a psycho killer.
The psycho, who has kidnapped his wife and kid, is challenged by an "old white guy in jeans, carrying," who's gun goes off after being shot at first, hitting the little girl, and gets himself shot.
It does end well, though. The wife picks up the old man's gun and kills her deranged husband.
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at February 26, 2014 07:22 AM (IXrOn)
And that's because these "national dialogues" are never really dialogues at all.
They're just the Left deciding that now is the time to Do Something, which is: the usual preaching put into overdrive + angry protesters + demonization of the other side.
Posted by: Lizzy at February 26, 2014 07:22 AM (aq/zi)
That sounds bizarre. Which ones?
Posted by: Waterhouse at February 26, 2014 07:22 AM (t8ySh)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 26, 2014 07:22 AM (dDf+N)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 26, 2014 07:22 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: Votermom at February 26, 2014 07:22 AM (GSIDW)
Posted by: Kristophr at February 26, 2014 07:22 AM (c6N69)
Posted by: thunderb at February 26, 2014 07:23 AM (zOTsN)
Every living thing on this planet has a some form of built in instinct to protect its life. From single cells to mankind, the drive to live is universal.
Therefore, my right to protect my life is utterly outside any form of man-made structure. (i.e. inalienable).
It does NOT exist because of the 2nd Amendment. You can destroy every copy of the US Constitution on the planet on down to the original and I will laugh in your face when you try and tell me that I therefore don't have a right to protect myself.
Now.
What's more laughable?
The utterly ridiculous attempt to tell another human being they must forfeit that instinct and face injury or death because of the fear another person has of an inanimate object.
And then, since they know they're losing the argument, there's the hilarious quasi-Luddite appeal to your reason.
"Well, you can use a gun but it has to be the muskets in use when the 2A was drafted" or "OK, then just older guns that hold less than 10 rounds like revolvers and maybe a 1911 but not the newer ones that hold more" and the always favorite "I don't want you to have one of those because.....well, just look at it! It looks like something a soldier would carry!"
You don't have a right to tell me how, when, or even if I can protect myself and you g-damn sure don't have a right to restrict my efforts to a particular century or level of technology because you know your argument is full of shit from the get-go.
Posted by: B at February 26, 2014 07:23 AM (5OEha)
Posted by: maddogg at February 26, 2014 07:23 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2014 07:24 AM (zqvg6)
And yet over the past day, I've been in a discussion on Twitter with someone who claims to be for 2nd Am rights, but doesn't want teachers to have firearms in school.
Tell them a child is more likely to be molested by a teacher than shot by one and watch their head explode.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at February 26, 2014 07:24 AM (zF6Iw)
I recall they were voting on Women's suffrage, and voted against. Every voter in the photo was carrying a ceremonial sword.
Posted by: Kristophr at February 26, 2014 07:24 AM (c6N69)
Posted by: Boss Moss at February 26, 2014 07:24 AM (6bMeY)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 26, 2014 07:24 AM (CRyse)
*face palm*
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 26, 2014 07:24 AM (dDf+N)
Posted by: AZ Hi Desert (All my Hate cannot be found) at February 26, 2014 10:52 AM (O9qtX)
I think the logic is muddled on both sides of that argument, yours and the commenter you complain about. If someone argues that guns are exceptional because guns are designed to kill, I would agree that yes, guns are weapons (as well as hunting tools) and not hammers or screwdrivers or wrenches, which have other purposes, but their potential use as weaponry does not give federal and state governments the authority to circumvent or outright violate the Constitution in order to proscribe or infringe upon their ownership and use by private citizens.
So yes, guns are exceptional--certainly to the Founders, who constructed an amendment specifically to ensure their continued possession by the people. Thus, in the end it's about constitutional freedom. To compare a gun to a car is disinegenuous.
Posted by: troyriser at February 26, 2014 07:24 AM (V9ol4)
Any SC morons here right now? I just found out that I am taking the wife to Charleston this weekend for her birthday present and I would like to know the basics for CC there. I'm assuming that I keep my permit with me at all times when I'm armed and must disclose that to a LEO if I am directly addressed.
What are the particulars for restaurants and bars? Carry is ok, unless posted and no alcohol while carrying?
Walking around town is ok though right?
Posted by: EC at February 26, 2014 07:24 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Kristophr at February 26, 2014 11:22 AM (c6N69)
Yes? And? If you're proposing a federal mandate to own a gun, then you'd require a federally mandated sales tax to offset the non-gun owners.
Sounds a bit like Obammycare, doesn't it?
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/b][/i] at February 26, 2014 07:24 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Rounding Error Extraordinaire at February 26, 2014 07:25 AM (YyiJ+)
Posted by: Mr. Dave at February 26, 2014 07:25 AM (7GJd1)
Posted by: WalrusRex at February 26, 2014 07:25 AM (Hx5uv)
Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2014 07:25 AM (zqvg6)
And we f*cking disarm our military while they're on base.
Posted by: phreshone at February 26, 2014 07:26 AM (Q6pxP)
Posted by: Self-aware Progressive at February 26, 2014 07:26 AM (XO6WW)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at February 26, 2014 07:27 AM (zfY+H)
Posted by: Jean at February 26, 2014 11:21 AM (4JkHl)
I think it was more that the Ukrainians ceded the Crimea without opposition. It's full of ethnic Russians and Sevastopol is home to the Black Sea fleet, so the Russians weren't going to give it up anyway.
Posted by: joncelli at February 26, 2014 07:27 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Kristophr at February 26, 2014 07:27 AM (c6N69)
Posted by: CJ at February 26, 2014 11:10 AM
======
Or the Left employing deceit (and sometimes outright hoaxes) when the facts don't agree with the narrative.
Michael Bellisile's book "Arming America" and the brouhaha that followed is a good example:
LINK: http://hnn.us/article/691 (history news network) h/t posse incitatus
Posted by: mrp at February 26, 2014 07:27 AM (JBggj)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/b][/i] at February 26, 2014 07:27 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 26, 2014 07:27 AM (g1DWB)
If it were a liberal idea, they would subsidize it.
Posted by: Jean at February 26, 2014 07:27 AM (4JkHl)
I didn't know this was happening today:
Enforcing the PresidentÂ’s Constitutional Duty to Faithfully Execute the Laws
http://tinyurl.com/ndz32kt
live stream at link
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at February 26, 2014 07:27 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: thunderb at February 26, 2014 07:27 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Roadrunner at February 26, 2014 07:28 AM (7NvBG)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 26, 2014 07:28 AM (CRyse)
Posted by: mugiwara at February 26, 2014 07:28 AM (W7ffl)
From instruction I actually received at Ft. Benning.
"...The Browning M2 .50 caliber heavy machine gun is designed in accord with the Geneva Conventions only to engage enemy equipment. (pause) A belt buckle is equipment. A helmet is equipment. It is NOT YOUR PROBLEM how close the enemy chooses to stand to his equipment..."
Posted by: Self-aware Progressive at February 26, 2014 07:28 AM (XO6WW)
Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2014 07:29 AM (zqvg6)
Posted by: Bill at February 26, 2014 07:30 AM (uvyrw)
157: "But you will serve if you want to vote."
This is actually an idea I can get fully behind. Much like Heinlein's model.
However, the idea that you want all public employees to be paid minimum wage is very short sighted. Some jobs require a degree of continuity to be done. Of course those jobs do not include congress critters. More like FBI, CIA, etc.
There ARE still some things that the government actually shouls be doing.
Take a look at the employees next time you go to McDonald's. Are THOSE the kinds of mugs you want running things?
But to counterbalance this, I'd support salary and benefit caps.
Posted by: Azenogoth (Freedom or Fire) Est. 1836 at February 26, 2014 07:30 AM (v6cwT)
You love your gun?
Teach every kid you know to love and respect them too.
Posted by: sven10077 at February 26, 2014 11:02 AM (TE35l)"
I have a great idea for the up coming 7 year old birthday party.
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at February 26, 2014 07:30 AM (PD6iL)
Posted by: EC at February 26, 2014 11:24 AM (GQ8sn)
It depends on the State
These are States with reciprocity on CCW with SC
http://www.youcancarry.com/south-carolina-ccw-reciprocity/
And as far as I know the law applies to everywhere in the State except (right now) bars, government buildings, and places where CCW prohibited.
There has been a law passed recently to allow it in almost all places.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 26, 2014 07:30 AM (T2V/1)
One guy who was in the first movie is in this one. Charlize Theron plays the driver of a War Rig. Lets hope she does better in this than Prometheus. But probably not.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 26, 2014 07:30 AM (dDf+N)
Posted by: See You Next Tuesday at February 26, 2014 07:30 AM (DAevm)
One Canton still refuses to give women the vote, Appenzell Innerrhoden.
Posted by: Kristophr at February 26, 2014 07:31 AM (c6N69)
What ^^^^^^^ said. Agree completely. It is very basic, and impossible to argue against effectively.
Tell them a child is more likely to be molested by a teacher than shot by one and watch their head explode.
Posted by: Mary Poppins' Practically Perfect Piercing at February 26, 2014 11:24 AM (zF6Iw)
Good one. I'll have to remember that.
Of course, the 17 year old boy bending over his 24 year old teacher isn't really molesting, to him. Legally, of course it is - because of the authority issue if nothing else.
However, most of the publicized cases of this involve boys of about 13-15, not 17-18.
Posted by: grognard at February 26, 2014 07:31 AM (/29Nl)
Posted by: sven10077 at February 26, 2014 07:32 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: ontherocks at February 26, 2014 07:32 AM (8AaQe)
Posted by: Kristophr at February 26, 2014 07:32 AM (c6N69)
Posted by: X at February 26, 2014 07:32 AM (KHo8t)
Posted by: awkward davies at February 26, 2014 07:32 AM (whqez)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/b][/i] at February 26, 2014 07:32 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: blaster at February 26, 2014 07:32 AM (4+AaH)
Posted by: maddogg at February 26, 2014 07:33 AM (xWW96)
So my NC permit will allow me to carry in public?
Do you know if reciprocity means I can carry in bars and restaurants if I don't drink alcohol, unless posted?
Posted by: EC at February 26, 2014 07:33 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: steevy at February 26, 2014 07:34 AM (zqvg6)
Have you ever tried to CGI testicles onto an entire cast of modern male actors?
Posted by: Richard McEnroe at February 26, 2014 07:34 AM (XO6WW)
Space suit testing.
Orbital drop testing.
Ballistic armour testing.
Lots of stuff.
Posted by: EC at February 26, 2014 07:34 AM (GQ8sn)
Yes, it is truly disgusting - and clearly a coordinated approach (likely driven by the teachers unions). What they can't control is how Hollywood fetishizes (sp?) guns and all of the shoot-em up video games. I have a tween, and the only XBox games that interest him involve Legos (Minecraft) and shooting aliens.
Posted by: Lizzy at February 26, 2014 07:34 AM (aq/zi)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 26, 2014 07:34 AM (SY2Kh)
Why don't you see if you can make it to the range to bust a few caps in his honor?
Posted by: Obnoxious A-hole at February 26, 2014 07:34 AM (PD6iL)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at February 26, 2014 07:35 AM (gBnkX)
Posted by: Roadrunner at February 26, 2014 07:35 AM (7NvBG)
Posted by: fastfreefall at February 26, 2014 07:37 AM (xEdOF)
The T-10 parachute was developed by making the closest thing the US Army had to a punishment battalion test parachutes.
They were slowly made smaller and smaller until the broken leg rate was in acceptable limits. Unfortunately, by that point, the entire battalion were all parachuting experts, which meant that the T-10 was way, way too fast of a parachute.
Posted by: Kristophr at February 26, 2014 07:38 AM (c6N69)
Posted by: ontherocks at February 26, 2014 07:38 AM (8AaQe)
Posted by: awkward davies at February 26, 2014 07:38 AM (whqez)
Do you know if reciprocity means I can carry in bars and restaurants if I don't drink alcohol, unless posted?
Posted by: EC at February 26, 2014 11:33 AM (GQ8sn)
Yes if you mean concealed. I don't know how they are for open carry. Because the law hasn't made it into signing yet you can not carry in bars which are ALL located in restaurants by law.
When the new law goes into effect you will be able to carry in bar/restaurants as long as you do not drink alcohol. I do not think that law has gone into effect yet.
The other places I meant by "prohibited" are ones that have a sign posted on the door saying no weapons".
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 26, 2014 07:38 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Mindy at February 26, 2014 07:39 AM (mQwL2)
Arguments are useful, but people believing something on a gut level (no argument needed) is the most powerful "argument" of all. And people's daily experience provides that sort of non-argument "argument."
Posted by: ace at February 26, 2014 11:03 AM (/FnUH)
I've converted a couple of anti-gun folks by taking them to the range. I tell them that I just want to give them some first-hand experience, no politics, no attempt at bringing them over to the Dark Side, and that nobody changes their mind based on a single range trip. Of course, I'm being more than a little bit sneaky, emphasizing the fun stuff and leaving the serious part for later reflection.
Surprisingly effective, which is why leftists do their damnedest to throw up roadblocks to ANY positive aspects of teh boomsticks.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 26, 2014 07:39 AM (TIIx5)
Who is correct? Has the law allowing CC in bars been signed or not?
Posted by: EC at February 26, 2014 07:40 AM (GQ8sn)
Exactly- I was an FFL for 19 years and kept all my inventory after closing. Mostly selective-fire stuff, including a couple of belt-feds.
I was trained by the best in the world, and like most people who've been on the hard side am actually a very peaceable soul.
But I won't put up with any nonsense, either.
Posted by: backhoe at February 26, 2014 07:41 AM (ULH4o)
"...The Browning M2 .50 caliber heavy machine gun is designed in accord with the Geneva Conventions only to engage enemy equipment.
"Sir, I was NOT engaging that OPFOR soldier, that would be against UCMJ and the laws of war. I was engaging his LBE."
/Pvt Orr to my first Battalion Commander (Vietnam vet, SF, battlefield commission in VN).
Heard it with my own two ears. Made the colonel laugh, though.
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 26, 2014 07:46 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: Richard McEnroe at February 26, 2014 07:47 AM (XO6WW)
Posted by: Richard McEnroe at February 26, 2014 11:47 AM (XO6WW)
A friend of mine, a retired Sergeant Major, took me by where Harmony Church used to be when I was down there to watch my son graduate from Infantry AIT last year.
God I'm old.
Posted by: troyriser at February 26, 2014 07:50 AM (V9ol4)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at February 26, 2014 07:55 AM (5xmd7)
I think that Ukraine pushing for a 2nd Amendment law is a wonderful development and I hope they can push it through. Once they've had a taste of that right, they won't easily allow it to be removed in the future.
Posted by: GnuBreed at February 26, 2014 07:57 AM (wNF3N)
The police constables (PC) aren't armed. The Metro cops are. Those are the ones that arrive on scene with MP5's and will drop you with a burst.
Posted by: EC at February 26, 2014 08:00 AM (GQ8sn)
We're having a party! BYOB (bring your own barstock).
Posted by: GnuBreed at February 26, 2014 08:03 AM (wNF3N)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 26, 2014 08:10 AM (SY2Kh)
According to FBI stats, about 200 times more likely. They like to scream "LIES!" when you bring that up.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at February 26, 2014 08:14 AM (zfY+H)
Posted by: nip at February 26, 2014 08:17 AM (SxlUl)
Posted by: X at February 26, 2014 08:19 AM (KHo8t)
Posted by: WTP at February 26, 2014 08:31 AM (sPO/s)
Posted by: Chairman LMAO at February 26, 2014 08:33 AM (9eDbm)
Posted by: WTP at February 26, 2014 08:33 AM (sPO/s)
Posted by: Blake at February 26, 2014 10:56 AM (HBuxY)
Right there! That is the thing. My home (or my vehicle, or my family, or my person) is MINE! Don't make me use my GOD-given right to defend myself. You won't like the sentence I impose.
Posted by: Erowmero at February 26, 2014 02:34 PM (OONaw)
Posted by: panzernashorn at February 26, 2014 02:38 PM (MhA4j)
Posted by: Chris_Balsz at February 26, 2014 04:00 PM (5xmd7)
Posted by: Fretless at February 26, 2014 05:27 PM (dO4Kx)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3063 seconds, 394 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Tyranny is scarier.
Posted by: Steve in Greensboro at February 26, 2014 06:45 AM (jj+6/)