April 10, 2014
— Gabriel Malor It occurred to me while we were doing the podcast this week that we could all use a refresher on how one goes about holding an executive branch official in contempt of Congress. As you may recall, House Oversight will vote on a contempt citation for Lois Lerner next week and Speaker Boehner has said that the full House will vote on it thereafter.
I wrote this explainer on contempt of Congress way, way back in 2008 during the end of the U.S. attorneys firing scandal. The issue then, like now, was getting information out of reluctant executive branch officials. Lois Lerner is on the second track I describe below. AG Holder is on the fourth track.
If Congress wants to hold someone in contempt for failure to comply with a subpoena, they can do several things:(1) Hold congressional contempt proceedings. These are quasi-judicial proceedings, rooted in the constitutional investigatory and legislative power of Congress, in which the members of Congress themselves act as judges, juries, and prosecutors. It is very important to note that this is not a judicial process. The chamber of Congress in question has the power to direct the Sergeant at Arms to arrest someone, bring them before the chamber, and put them in jail, all without seeing the inside of a courtroom.
See McGrain v. Daugherty, for an example of this upheld by the Supreme Court. The Court held that such powers were “necessary and proper” for Congress to carry out its legislative function.
This is the “historical” method by which a chamber of Congress has enforced its subpoenas. It was employed some dozen or more times up until 1934 but it was deemed too time consuming because it required the attention of the whole chamber, sometimes for more than a week. In the 1850s an alternative procedure was hotly debated and eventually created. But this method still exists. And this is the source of what is referred to as the “inherent contempt” proceeding.
For completnessÂ’ sake I should mention that individuals imprisoned under this procedure may petition for habeas relief from federal courts. They therefore will have some opportunity (though likely limited) to raise defenses (for example, Fifth Amendment or executive privilege) and challenge the validity of the contempt finding. On the other hand, there is general consensus that this type of imprisonment is not a criminal penalty and therefore is not subject to the presidential pardon power.
(2) Certify a contempt citation and deliver it to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. This is a multi-step process. First, the committee (or subcommittee) that is seeking the citation must approve it by majority vote. Then, it gets handed up to be read and voted on by the next higher authority (either the full chamber or the committee). Once the full chamber has certified the contempt citation, a report is prepared and presented to the U.S. Attorney. The U.S.A. then has a duty to present the contempt citation and report to a grand jury in order to get an indictment for contempt of Congress. See 2 U.S.C. § 194.
This is the modern, statutory method that Congress has used to lay contempt charges on reluctant witnesses. This is criminal contempt. A contempt indictment then goes through the normal judicial process, meaning the subjects of the citation will have the opportunity to raise defenses or outright challenge the validity of the contempt citation. Individuals punished by criminal contempt may seek a presidential pardon.
(3) The Senate has another option. Under a newer law, deemed necessary during President NixonÂ’s battles with Congress, the Senate can seek a civil contempt order from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Defiance of this order would be contempt of court, rather than contempt of Congress. The district court will examine the validity of the civil contempt citation. Individuals facing a civil contempt order will have the opportunity to challenge it and raise defenses, just like in the criminal contempt proceeding. This civil contempt option is sharply limited. It may not be employed against federal employees acting in their official capacities.
(4) Finally, either chamber could file suit in civil court for declaratory and injunctive relief after it has issued a subpoena that has been ignored. This is not a contempt proceeding, but it would be one way of enforcing subpoenas if any of the contempt procedures above failed. This is the least tested option, especially when the subpoenas are directed at the Executive Branch, because it raises so many separation of powers questions. Congress would be asking the Judiciary to force action by the Executive. Courts are usually very unhappy about doing that and usually refuse to rule on such cases, citing the political question doctrine. The doctrine provides that some questions are more properly committed to a coequal branch of government, that the court has no standards with which to resolve the dispute, or that it would be imprudent to interfere. This procedure also allows the subpoenaed individuals to present defenses and challenges to the validity of the Congressional subpoena.
In short, Congress has several options for enforcing subpoenas, but in each case the subpoenaed individual will have the opportunity to raise defenses and challenge CongressÂ’ contempt order. Given recent events, of most interest for us will be claims of executive privilege.
Ace asked about it and I said on the podcast that it would be extremely unusual for the House to exercise its inherent contempt powers under the first track described above since they haven't done it since the 1930s. House Republicans say they haven't ruled it out in Lerner's case.
Posted by: Gabriel Malor at
03:03 PM
| Comments (245)
Post contains 951 words, total size 6 kb.
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:06 PM (CMkNk)
Posted by: Smith the Inglorious at April 10, 2014 03:08 PM (sac/h)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:08 PM (CMkNk)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 10, 2014 03:09 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: NWConservative at April 10, 2014 03:10 PM (buZ/8)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) at April 10, 2014 03:10 PM (HDwDg)
Posted by: Nurse Ratched at April 10, 2014 03:11 PM (o44nj)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:12 PM (CMkNk)
Posted by: Costanza Defense at April 10, 2014 03:12 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:12 PM (CMkNk)
Sacred honor prevents me from providing the tasty, salacious details of our prolonged, multi-limbed boinking
Posted by: Will Folks ( always semi-erect ) at April 10, 2014 03:13 PM (JyjXt)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 10, 2014 03:13 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: Smith the Inglorious at April 10, 2014 03:13 PM (sac/h)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 10, 2014 03:13 PM (8ZskC)
Wait so what got voted on today?
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) at April 10, 2014 07:10 PM (HDwDg)
It was a committee vote to send the (potential) referral to the US Attorney for the District of Columbia of contempt of Congress charges against Lerner to the full House.
Posted by: steveegg at April 10, 2014 03:13 PM (o44nj)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:13 PM (CMkNk)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:14 PM (CMkNk)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 10, 2014 03:14 PM (8ZskC)
Well, we know it wasn't you....you have a bad wrist.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 10, 2014 03:15 PM (QFxY5)
Posted by: davidt at April 10, 2014 03:15 PM (nEIMV)
Posted by: Minnfidel at April 10, 2014 03:15 PM (igKtt)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:16 PM (CMkNk)
Without looking, I predicted that the new HHS head would be:
-- Yet another member of the Ivy League mafia
-- A longtime Democratic Party hack functionary
-- Checking at least one identity politics box
Nailed it three for three. Not that this is hard. It's the same depressing cookie cutter from which so many of this administration's other little fuhrers have been stamped.
BTW, this nominee's history as a party hack goes all the way back to Michael flipping Dukakis. They're really having to scrape the bottom. Maybe next they can exhume an old Mondale hand.
Posted by: torquewrench at April 10, 2014 03:16 PM (noWW6)
Posted by: RWC at April 10, 2014 03:16 PM (QeH9j)
Posted by: Smith the Inglorious Bastard at April 10, 2014 03:16 PM (sac/h)
You know better, JJ.
After all, this is a complex process which will require lengthy deliberation, ample time for All Voices to be Heard, the sort of collegial action for which Congress is so famous, and of course much consideration of the potential harm it might do to the feelings of Choom Boy, who must be protected from any negative consequences because Affirmative Action.
Once again, the Poppin Fresh "in fairness" doctrine will triumph, as it must. No actions detrimental to (underpaid) Women and other Protected Minorities allowed. As shown by the proceedings against Holder.
Posted by: MrScribbler at April 10, 2014 03:17 PM (dDzOj)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:17 PM (CMkNk)
Posted by: Country Singer at April 10, 2014 03:18 PM (r/e1Q)
Can it be employed against federal employees who have acted beyond the stipulated limits of their official capacities?
That is, against people who have broken the law under color of authority?
Posted by: torquewrench at April 10, 2014 03:18 PM (noWW6)
Posted by: Golfman in NC at April 10, 2014 03:18 PM (/djtm)
thanks Gabe was wondering about option 1. so they could, if they really really wanted to jail her until she is cooperative.
Posted by: rich@gmu at April 10, 2014 03:18 PM (RhQvZ)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:19 PM (CMkNk)
Posted by: thunderb at April 10, 2014 03:19 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: grammie winger at April 10, 2014 03:20 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: Weepin' Johnny Boehner at April 10, 2014 03:20 PM (r/e1Q)
Trivial private sector experience, no real management experience, and a policy hack from way back.
We're in good hands.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 10, 2014 03:20 PM (QFxY5)
It is an explanation of the four ways the Republicans are going to do nothing.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 10, 2014 03:21 PM (QFxY5)
Posted by: torquewrench at April 10, 2014 07:18 PM
Republicans & all holdovers from teh Eeeeevil Boooosh? You damn betcha. Democrats? Not so much....
Posted by: MrScribbler at April 10, 2014 03:21 PM (dDzOj)
Posted by: Golfman in NC at April 10, 2014 03:22 PM (/djtm)
Posted by: grammie winger at April 10, 2014 03:22 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: Jean-Pierre Folderol, Member, The League of Ugly Shirted Gentlemen at April 10, 2014 03:22 PM (FlRtG)
How do you explain this, Gabe?
Is it because the US Attorney for the DC District refuses to submit the contempt finding to grand jury?
Posted by: GnuBreed at April 10, 2014 03:23 PM (cHZB7)
Posted by: mugiwara at April 10, 2014 03:23 PM (3a584)
And gee, wouldn't you know, it was precisely in order to pack that particular court with Obama nominees that Dingy Harry invoked the "nuclear option" and did away with filibusters.
Almost as though the Democrats figured something like this was on the way and they needed to be beefing up their defenses.
Posted by: torquewrench at April 10, 2014 03:23 PM (noWW6)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 10, 2014 03:24 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: Integrotty at April 10, 2014 03:24 PM (wu/TK)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 10, 2014 03:25 PM (lUXJH)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 10, 2014 03:25 PM (o3MSL)
Posted by: Minnfidel at April 10, 2014 03:25 PM (igKtt)
Posted by: grammie winger at April 10, 2014 03:26 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: tasker at April 10, 2014 03:28 PM (RJMhd)
Posted by: Country Singer at April 10, 2014 03:29 PM (r/e1Q)
Our laws are being ignored and circumvented under the harsh rule of this Lawless Administration.
We have a Potus who rewrites a Law that he pushed for and signed...in order to delay the political consequences.
And he makes new laws with a stroke of his pen.
Congress has been rendered impotent and has seen fit to accept this position.
So while it is nice to contemplate what could be done 'under the law'...it is a futile exercise in our present state of flagrant Lawlessness.
I am reminded of that saying from the OJ Simpson trial...
"No Justice -- No Peace."
Because it seems like this is the direction they are pushing us towards.
Posted by: wheatie at April 10, 2014 03:30 PM (FWbLS)
Posted by: Smith the Inglorious Bastard at April 10, 2014 03:30 PM (sac/h)
Posted by: Anna Puma at April 10, 2014 03:31 PM (7jDXZ)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:31 PM (CMkNk)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 10, 2014 03:31 PM (o3MSL)
Posted by: Dang at April 10, 2014 03:31 PM (MNq6o)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:31 PM (CMkNk)
Posted by: Contrary to what Benghazi proves at April 10, 2014 03:32 PM (wu/TK)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:32 PM (CMkNk)
Two ladies are wearing very nicely Daisy Dukes that are so short Daisy would be embarrassed. Then there is the one in the black leather micro-mini and black f@ck me pumps.
Now back to your regularly scheduled post. I hear some sushi calling my name.
Posted by: Anna Puma at April 10, 2014 07:31 PM (7jDXZ)
Go on
Posted by: The Jackhole at April 10, 2014 03:32 PM (nTgAI)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 10, 2014 03:33 PM (lUXJH)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:33 PM (CMkNk)
She triggered me! ....I couldn't help it! She triggered me!
Posted by: Woman who threw the Shoe at Hillary at April 10, 2014 03:33 PM (FWbLS)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 10, 2014 03:33 PM (o3MSL)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:34 PM (CMkNk)
Posted by: steevy at April 10, 2014 03:34 PM (zqvg6)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:35 PM (CMkNk)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 10, 2014 03:36 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:36 PM (CMkNk)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 10, 2014 03:38 PM (lUXJH)
Posted by: Ministry of British Fart Control at April 10, 2014 03:39 PM (5ikDv)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 07:36 PM (CMkNk)
1 million guns short, unless 1 million are rifles and shotguns.
Posted by: steveegg at April 10, 2014 03:40 PM (o44nj)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:40 PM (CMkNk)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 10, 2014 03:40 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: spypeach at April 10, 2014 03:40 PM (10H0T)
80...I want to see Elijah Cumstain sweat a bit.
Yes, please.
At this point, is there any doubt at all that this shit does not go directly to the top?
No doubt....none whatsoever.
Posted by: Woman who threw the Shoe at Hillary at April 10, 2014 03:41 PM (FWbLS)
Posted by: rickb223 at April 10, 2014 03:41 PM (lUXJH)
Posted by: thunderb at April 10, 2014 03:42 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:42 PM (CMkNk)
Posted by: LFW - Honorary Pointy Eared Vulcan at April 10, 2014 03:44 PM (vVSOO)
On April 9th, Dropbox announced that Condoleezza Rice will be joining their Board of Directors. Dropbox's CEO, Drew Houston, posted the following message: ....
Posted by: Politics is too political at April 10, 2014 03:44 PM (rCS6C)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 10, 2014 03:44 PM (0HooB)
Posted by: Anna Puma at April 10, 2014 03:45 PM (nYpZB)
Posted by: The Farmer at April 10, 2014 03:45 PM (eBupg)
Posted by: Apple pie & keep mum at April 10, 2014 03:46 PM (wu/TK)
Posted by: LFW - Honorary Pointy Eared Vulcan at April 10, 2014 03:48 PM (vVSOO)
99...Our Atty Gen is a whiney racist idiot. He asks what AG has been treated like this?
John Ashcroft was certainly treated worse.
And Alberto Gonzales was repeated raked over the coals by the Dems.
Posted by: wheatie at April 10, 2014 03:49 PM (FWbLS)
Posted by: Wonkish Rogue at April 10, 2014 03:50 PM (dvRYt)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 10, 2014 03:50 PM (oFCZn)
They will do this because Conservatives almost never and I mean almost never push back. But when we do, well we have a whole bunch of fellow Conservatives who will rush to throw them under the bus.
You know what the left does? They turn their's into folk heros and put their faces on t-shirts and rub our noses in it by putting them in positions where they have either influence or a public presence.
Until we are willing to do the same they will win.
Posted by: southdakotaboy at April 10, 2014 03:50 PM (yh4lQ)
Posted by: Velvet Ambition, the guy that will push that button at April 10, 2014 03:51 PM (R8hU8)
Posted by: Adam at April 10, 2014 03:51 PM (Aif/5)
Posted by: Eric "Red" Holder at April 10, 2014 03:51 PM (o3MSL)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at April 10, 2014 03:54 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at April 10, 2014 03:55 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: K Seb at April 10, 2014 03:56 PM (wu/TK)
Posted by: Minnfidel at April 10, 2014 03:56 PM (igKtt)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/s] [/u] at April 10, 2014 03:58 PM (Sow0v)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 10, 2014 03:59 PM (X9npt)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 10, 2014 04:00 PM (0HooB)
Posted by: The Farmer at April 10, 2014 04:01 PM (eBupg)
Posted by: Harasstivists at April 10, 2014 04:03 PM (wu/TK)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 10, 2014 04:06 PM (HVff2)
I would sourly note that this administration is routinely engaging in brute force power grabs that hearken back to the very worst of FDR in the 1930s as well. So let's dust off the old rules on both sides, shall we?
Posted by: torquewrench at April 10, 2014 04:06 PM (noWW6)
Posted by: Smith the Inglorious Bastard at April 10, 2014 04:08 PM (sac/h)
Posted by: Steve in Greensboro at April 10, 2014 04:09 PM (ZG3Fa)
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at April 10, 2014 04:09 PM (1CroS)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 10, 2014 04:13 PM (0HooB)
Congress could throw Lerner into the volcano but would first have to delicately and prolongedly determine the state of her virginity.
---------------
Uh huh. And just who, exactly, would volunteer for that job?
Posted by: LFW - Honorary Pointy Eared Vulcan at April 10, 2014 04:13 PM (vVSOO)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 10, 2014 04:15 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: Vince Foster [/i] [/b] at April 10, 2014 04:16 PM (5ikDv)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 10, 2014 04:17 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: mike at April 10, 2014 04:18 PM (RFg2q)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at April 10, 2014 04:20 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: tasker at April 10, 2014 04:25 PM (RJMhd)
Posted by: Buckeye Abroad at April 10, 2014 04:28 PM (/h+xv)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 10, 2014 04:29 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 10, 2014 04:30 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Richard Gere at April 10, 2014 04:33 PM (mx5oN)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 10, 2014 04:34 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at April 10, 2014 04:35 PM (e8kgV)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 10, 2014 04:35 PM (0HooB)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) at April 10, 2014 04:36 PM (HDwDg)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 10, 2014 04:37 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Beyond Disgusted at April 10, 2014 04:37 PM (thLL8)
Posted by: Beyond Disgusted at April 10, 2014 04:39 PM (thLL8)
Posted by: Joe Biden at April 10, 2014 04:39 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 10, 2014 04:40 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Beyond Disgusted at April 10, 2014 04:41 PM (thLL8)
Posted by: Ezra The Schill at April 10, 2014 04:41 PM (RJMhd)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 10, 2014 04:41 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 10, 2014 04:43 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: willow channeling our gop and other leaders that have passed at April 10, 2014 04:43 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Beyond Disgusted at April 10, 2014 04:43 PM (thLL8)
Posted by: Sheriff Joe at April 10, 2014 04:45 PM (RJMhd)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 10, 2014 04:45 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: Damnit I Forgot The Biden at April 10, 2014 04:46 PM (RJMhd)
Posted by: irongrampa at April 10, 2014 04:48 PM (SAMxH)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 04:49 PM (nqBYe)
This shit wouldn't be happening under a President Perry.
Perry has been talking about the plight of our protein producers...for years.
But he's been doing it on the business channels.
Burning food in our cars is insane.
It has also had a disastrous effect on our protein producers.
Posted by: wheatie at April 10, 2014 04:49 PM (FWbLS)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 07:34 PM (CMkNk)
I'm sure you meant lingerie. Linguini is certainly a typo
Posted by: Asscheeks of Saturn at April 10, 2014 04:50 PM (mcQuu)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 04:51 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Ewetube at April 10, 2014 04:52 PM (wu/TK)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at April 10, 2014 04:52 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 04:53 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 10, 2014 04:53 PM (0HooB)
Posted by: Kreplach at April 10, 2014 04:54 PM (Xkr8I)
Posted by: Some Guy in Wisconsin at April 10, 2014 04:54 PM (6NAMw)
Posted by: rickl at April 10, 2014 04:54 PM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Barky McShitstain at April 10, 2014 04:54 PM (thLL8)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 04:55 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: yankeefifth at April 10, 2014 04:55 PM (rDidD)
Posted by: yankeefifth at April 10, 2014 04:57 PM (rDidD)
Posted by: tangonine at April 10, 2014 04:58 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 04:59 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 05:00 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at April 10, 2014 05:01 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Beyond Disgusted at April 10, 2014 05:01 PM (thLL8)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 05:03 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Stringer Davis at April 10, 2014 05:03 PM (xq1UY)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 10, 2014 05:04 PM (HVff2)
Maybe Boehner can do his Iron Eyes Cody imitation and weep at Lerner and Holder - that'll teach these Chicago thugs a thing or three.
Posted by: [/i] [/s] [/u] [/b] An Observation at April 10, 2014 05:04 PM (ylhEn)
Posted by: The Collegial John McCain at April 10, 2014 05:04 PM (wNYbV)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 10, 2014 05:05 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 05:07 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Buckeye Abroad at April 10, 2014 05:09 PM (/h+xv)
Posted by: E.T. at April 10, 2014 05:10 PM (uGlk8)
Posted by: tangonine at April 10, 2014 05:13 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at April 10, 2014 05:14 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Arbalest at April 10, 2014 05:15 PM (FlRtG)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 05:15 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: shredded chi at April 10, 2014 05:16 PM (qXebp)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at April 10, 2014 05:16 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 05:16 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 10, 2014 05:17 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: tangonine at April 10, 2014 05:17 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 05:18 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: ScoggDog at April 10, 2014 05:18 PM (VdBU2)
Posted by: Jen at April 10, 2014 05:19 PM (Mt+Yq)
http://tinyurl.com/loygc7b
Hmmm, and how much time would King Putt and Holder be facing for 300 counts of Felony indifference Homicide in Fast and Furious?
Posted by: [/i] [/s] [/u] [/b] An Observation at April 10, 2014 05:20 PM (ylhEn)
Posted by: Soothie at April 10, 2014 05:21 PM (6iScy)
Posted by: Kreplach at April 10, 2014 05:23 PM (Xkr8I)
Posted by: Soothie at April 10, 2014 05:24 PM (6iScy)
Posted by: Daybrother at April 10, 2014 05:24 PM (P8IDJ)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 10, 2014 05:25 PM (0HooB)
Posted by: grammie winger at April 10, 2014 05:27 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: tangonine at April 10, 2014 05:31 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 05:32 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Jean at April 10, 2014 05:33 PM (Aqvh6)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at April 10, 2014 05:33 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: Puncher at April 10, 2014 05:33 PM (ujsWx)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 05:33 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at April 10, 2014 05:33 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: BLM at April 10, 2014 05:34 PM (4tBVN)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 05:34 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: tangonine at April 10, 2014 05:34 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: D-Lamp at April 10, 2014 05:38 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 05:38 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 05:39 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 05:41 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 05:42 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: tangonine at April 10, 2014 05:48 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Puncher at April 10, 2014 05:52 PM (1YgVg)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 05:53 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: willow at April 10, 2014 05:56 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: tangonine at April 10, 2014 06:03 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Mongerel at April 10, 2014 07:07 PM (YqWfw)
Posted by: silent voice of unreason at April 10, 2014 07:41 PM (Ub0iy)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at May 07, 2014 05:08 PM (aDwsi)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4051 seconds, 373 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 10, 2014 03:05 PM (CMkNk)