January 17, 2014

Obama Considering Raising the Minimum Wage for Federal Workers by Executive Order
— Ace

Of course.

From The Hill:


Obama and congressional Democrats are pushing for an across-the-board hike in the minimum hourly wage, from $7.25 to $10.10. But Republicans are cool to the plan, warning it could hurt the economy.



Federal contractors represent only a fraction of the nationÂ’s employees. Businesses that together received more than $446 billion in federal contracts employ some 2 million workers, only some of whom are paid the minimum wage. Still, an increase for that segment of the workforce could generate momentum toward a raise for all workers now paid the lowest amount allowable by law.



An executive order to that effect would be tantamount to setting a minimum wage for federal contractors, they said. “Profitable corporations that receive lucrative contracts from the federal government should pay all of their workers a decent wage,” the lawmakers wrote. Obama in recent days has vowed to make 2014 "a year of action," even if it means relying heavily on administrative authority to pursue policy goals in lieu of congressional action.

At first blush, I thought it was possible this would be permissible (if not advisable) under our Constitutional scheme, given that he was directing the Executive itself to make these payments.

But despite that trying-to-be-fair impulse, I'd still like to see legal opinions on this. After all, the President will not be paying these wages out of his own funds. The excess wages will, of course, be paid for by taxpayers, and absent an act of Congress raising the federal contractor minimum wage, this seems probably illegal.

As usual, of course.

"Year of Action," guys.

Thanks to @comradearthur.

Posted by: Ace at 08:25 AM | Comments (292)
Post contains 292 words, total size 2 kb.

1 He's got a pen, he's got a pone, and he's got Reggie.

Posted by: WalrusRex at January 17, 2014 08:26 AM (Hx5uv)

2 it depends upon the law to constrain those in power. Congress: you have this much money, and no more, to pay federal workers. Pay them however much you want, but workers*pay canÂ’t be greater than this. Hah, just kidding.

Posted by: Paid for by Citizens for Clyde the Orangutan at January 17, 2014 08:27 AM (QF8uk)

3 The New Podcast Link is causing some auto-play type issues at IE. ...and Affirmative Actin has consequences.

Posted by: garrett at January 17, 2014 08:27 AM (ZSjd6)

4 "Federal contractors" NOT federal employees.

Important difference since federal employees would include the military.

Posted by: noone, really [/i] [/b] at January 17, 2014 08:27 AM (5ikDv)

5 Barack Obama is a stuttering clusterf*ck of a malignant traitor.

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 08:27 AM (PYAXX)

6 What difference at this point does it make?  btw,, I'm soooooooo ready!

Posted by: Hillary Clinton at January 17, 2014 08:28 AM (GjPnA)

7 Looking at it from Obama's perspective, why wouldn't you do this?

Posted by: jwest at January 17, 2014 08:28 AM (u2a4R)

8 L'etat c'est moi, bitchez!

Posted by: King Barry XIV at January 17, 2014 08:28 AM (DrWcr)

9 I am Emperor Barack and you will obey...

Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at January 17, 2014 08:28 AM (9+ccr)

10 Its illegal only if Republicans do it silly. not the Chosen One especially.

Posted by: Guido 'H8tr extraordinaire' at January 17, 2014 08:28 AM (yICtd)

11 It is perfectly legal for a dictator to do anything at all he pleases.  Good day, Sir!

Posted by: Ex-MSLSD Host at January 17, 2014 08:28 AM (ndlFj)

12 I just wish he would go Full On Hugo and get it over with.

Posted by: RolandTHTG at January 17, 2014 08:28 AM (QM5S2)

13 Because the problem was the guys working the mailroom at CGI weren't making enough.

Posted by: garrett at January 17, 2014 08:29 AM (ZSjd6)

14 Has anybody gone to get the others?

Posted by: @JohnTant, now boasting a Clinton Disloyalty Index of 6 at January 17, 2014 08:29 AM (eytER)

15 Can Obama order Federal Contractors to pay 2x the going rate for gasoline and fossil fuels as a way to force them to use more "green" energy?

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at January 17, 2014 08:29 AM (ZPrif)

16 Okay... first off: what Federal Contractors aren't paying their employees more than $10/hr? Janitor services? Secondly: If you make it too expensive to do business with the Federal Government, people will choose not to do business with the Federal Government. Then what happens?

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 08:29 AM (PYAXX)

17 He really wants to put everyone on unemployment, doesn't he?
I can't believe no one in the WH understands what this will actually do to businesses, especially with the (expensive) Obamacare employer mandate looming.

Posted by: Lizzy at January 17, 2014 08:29 AM (POpqt)

18 He doesn't give a shit if it is illegal or not. Haven't we at least figured that out by now?

Posted by: DangerGirl Telecommunications at January 17, 2014 08:29 AM (LP0Fj)

19 1% of all workers make the minimum wage. What % of federal contractors make the minimum? I'd bet almost 0%.

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at January 17, 2014 08:29 AM (ZPrif)

20 I'm strangely wet.

Posted by: Hillary! at January 17, 2014 08:30 AM (JQuNB)

21 You get a car! And you get a car! Everybody gets a car! *A Trabant.

Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at January 17, 2014 08:30 AM (P7Wsr)

22 With his Pen, he is throwing yet another BONEr to his constituents. Gotta get those Dems re-elected: hold on to the Senate and take the House! Forward, Comrades!

Posted by: runningrn at January 17, 2014 08:30 AM (o6g4X)

23 It's all fair and shit for the gubmint to grow and be as expensive   as possible.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at January 17, 2014 08:30 AM (0HooB)

24 I'm strangely wet.

Posted by: Hillary! at January 17, 2014 12:30 PM (JQuNB)

 

Oooh, baby, I'll be right over.

Posted by: Huma Abedin at January 17, 2014 08:30 AM (DrWcr)

25 Well, he did slip and say "our businesses" in his little speech to his Cabinet the other day. Maybe that's the endgame?

Posted by: Lizzy at January 17, 2014 08:30 AM (POpqt)

26 "This administration acts like violating civil liberties is a way to enhance security. It is not." -Barack Obama, 2007

"No more ignoring the law when it is inconvenient. The law is not subject to the whims of stubborn rulers." -Barack Obama, 2007

Posted by: WalrusRex at January 17, 2014 08:30 AM (Hx5uv)

27 Oh, sorry, I thought you said “minimum wagyu”. Never mind.

Posted by: Barack Litella at January 17, 2014 08:30 AM (QF8uk)

28 Guys, if he's going to go all tribal, great. Let's do the same. War on lawyers. Let's have a maximum salary for anyone in the government that holds a law degree. I'm thinkin' $15/hr. After all, they should be willing to share.

Posted by: AmishDude at January 17, 2014 08:30 AM (T0NGe)

29 At first blush, I thought it was possible this would be permissible (if not advisable) under our Constitutional scheme, given that he was directing the Executive itself to make these payments.


The executive branch still has to get its budget from Congress.  So I think Barky can pay his minions whatever he wants provided he gets the budget for it.

Of course, this will never happen because strong opposition party and stuff.

Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at January 17, 2014 08:31 AM (8ZskC)

30 Take him to court, tie him up in knots, confound him, confuse him, punish him. This is a Republic not a Monarchy. Send a message or get the fuck out of the way

Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 17, 2014 08:31 AM (t3UFN)

31 If anyone should be making Min wage, it's Obama. It's the only pay scale the guy is qualified for.

Posted by: garrett at January 17, 2014 08:31 AM (ZSjd6)

32 "Year of Action," guys. Maobama's One Year Plan?

Posted by: BlueStateRebel at January 17, 2014 08:31 AM (7ObY1)

33 "12 I just wish he would go Full On Hugo and get it over with.
Posted by: RolandTHTG"

Just needs a parrot w/a beret....

Posted by: backhoe at January 17, 2014 08:31 AM (ULH4o)

34 Any low level min. wage work Federal contractors do is probably contracted out. So will Fed Contractors be prohibited from subcontracting to any firm that pays min wage? Prohibited from buying services and products from any firm that pays min wage to anyone?

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at January 17, 2014 08:31 AM (ZPrif)

35 I'm thinking that the number of minimum wage workers themselves at these contractors isn't too many. HOWEVER... how many of these contractors have unions working for them whose wages are tied to the minimum wage? I have a feeling that this is a way to try and steer a bunch of money to union employees which will end up costing these contractors money and, likely, the taxpayers will have to pay for it.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 17, 2014 08:31 AM (/Crba)

36 18 He doesn't give a shit if it is illegal or not. Haven't we at least figured that out by now? He also doesn't care if it makes people miserable. Miserable people vote Democrat.

Posted by: AmishDude at January 17, 2014 08:31 AM (T0NGe)

37 I swear to all that is holy if I hear one more asshole talk about how you can't raise a family making $7.25 an hour at McD's I'll go from rage stroke to real stroke. 


Working the drive thru window isn't a career fuck nuggets.

Posted by: Adam at January 17, 2014 08:31 AM (Aif/5)

38 Let's make a deal, include the federal employee minimum wage hike in that amnesty bill you want so bad and I won't veto it.

Posted by: SpongeBobObama at January 17, 2014 08:32 AM (kxSZr)

39 15 Can Obama order Federal Contractors to pay 2x the going rate for gasoline and fossil fuels as a way to force them to use more "green" energy?

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at January 17, 2014 12:29 PM (ZPrif)


Uh Joe, the NSA has just passed your idea along to O'boy...thanks.

Posted by: Guido 'H8tr extraordinaire' at January 17, 2014 08:32 AM (yICtd)

40 I'm strangely wet. Posted by: Hillary! That's your head leaking your brain aneurism.

Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at January 17, 2014 08:32 AM (P7Wsr)

41 Sounds like this is bullshit. Does anyone at Raytheon or Boeing actually make min. wage? I bet not a single employee does.

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at January 17, 2014 08:32 AM (ZPrif)

42 At first blush, I thought it was possible this would be permissible (if not advisable) under our Constitutional scheme, given that he was directing the Executive itself to make these payments. But despite that trying-to-be-fair impulse, I'd still like to see legal opinions on this. After all, the President will not be paying these wages out of his own funds. The excess wages will, of course, be paid for by taxpayers, and absent an act of Congress raising the federal contractor minimum wage, this seems probably illegal. That was my first impulse as well though I do not know anything about federal pay bands and federal contracting so hell if I know. I do know that distributed Horde knowledge knows though. C'mon. Cough it up.

Posted by: alexthechick - Come to us, oh mighty SMOD at January 17, 2014 08:32 AM (VtjlW)

43 I'm strangely wet. Posted by: Hillary! Who's turn is it to change granny's diaper?

Posted by: rickb223 at January 17, 2014 08:32 AM (lUXJH)

44 A president can do anything he wants, until the media stops him.

Posted by: jwest at January 17, 2014 08:32 AM (u2a4R)

45 Guys, if he's going to go all tribal, great. Let's do the same. War on lawyers. Let's have a maximum salary for anyone in the government that holds a law degree. I'm thinkin' $15/hr.

After all, they should be willing to share.

Posted by: AmishDude

That's just our stepping stone to Single Payer law-care!

Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at January 17, 2014 08:32 AM (nZiT2)

46

I just wish he would go Full On Hugo and get it over with.

 

He hasn't yet? Oh, yeah, you're right. I  still have toilet paper.

Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at January 17, 2014 08:33 AM (0HooB)

47 Just how many Federal Employees make minimum wage?

Posted by: I hear voices. at January 17, 2014 08:33 AM (ODqJ7)

48 Does anyone at Raytheon or Boeing actually make min. wage? I bet not a single employee does. --- MAYBE the janitorial staff or people working in the snack shop / lunch room if they have one. Certainly not people working on their core business.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 17, 2014 08:33 AM (/Crba)

49 HOWEVER... how many of these contractors have unions working for them whose wages are tied to the minimum wage? That's it, although I have to wonder how many of those contracts are still around. That used to be a big deal back in the day. But employers did get wise to it. But if it is the case that this is supposed to drive up the wages of union workers with such contracts, wouldn't it mean that right-to-work states would benefit?

Posted by: AmishDude at January 17, 2014 08:33 AM (T0NGe)

50

17 - You're getting warmer.

 

He wants a command economy - ran through large private companies executing federal decrees and managing the daily affairs.

 

It worked great in Germany ... for a while.

Posted by: ScoggDog at January 17, 2014 08:33 AM (cM7hk)

51 If I understand this correctly, it means that the government contract prices will "necessarily skyrocket" in order to cover the higher wages for the largely foreign visa holder contract employees.

Money gets made, donors get paid, low level contract employees, particularly H-visa holders , stay on the plantation.

Taxpayer funded, FTW.

Posted by: noone, really [/i] [/b] at January 17, 2014 08:33 AM (5ikDv)

52 Does anyone at Raytheon or Boeing actually make min. wage? I bet not a single employee does.

No, but I bet the people flipping burgers at the Burger King on base do. 

Posted by: no good deed at January 17, 2014 08:33 AM (vBhbc)

53 It's all about getting votes. LIV don't understand unintended cosequences. It's all about "fairness" and they think they can legislate that.

Posted by: small town girl in wyoming at January 17, 2014 08:33 AM (ETCgz)

54 Working the drive thru window isn't a career fuck nuggets. The way this man is shutting down industry, we might be killing each other for that drive-through job in a few years.

Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at January 17, 2014 08:34 AM (P7Wsr)

55 47 Just how many Federal Employees make minimum wage Probably none, but it sounds like obama is helping the "folks" unlike those evil Republicans...

Posted by: hello, it's me also a creep-assed cracka.. at January 17, 2014 08:34 AM (9+ccr)

56 many union contracts use wages based on the multiplier of the federal minimum wage...

Posted by: wilber at January 17, 2014 08:34 AM (b96e6)

57 >>Maobama's One Year Plan?

No kidding. And just yesterday Michelle was still using the insipid "move America forward!" slogan re: making college affordable.
"Let's Move!", "FORWARD", etc. - a little too "Great Leap Forward" for me.

Posted by: Lizzy at January 17, 2014 08:34 AM (POpqt)

58 Or in this case rule by decree.

Posted by: small town girl in wyoming at January 17, 2014 08:34 AM (ETCgz)

59 MAYBE the janitorial staff or people working in the snack shop / lunch room if they have one. Certainly not people working on their core business. Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 17, 2014 12:33 PM (/Crba) Is it ironic that President Obama has increased the role of unpaid interns?

Posted by: AmishDude at January 17, 2014 08:34 AM (T0NGe)

60 Here's an EO I *think* would pass constitutional muster (to force contractors to pay > minimum wage). "No Executive Branch agency shall renew nor approve new contracts to 3rd party agencies which do not pay a minimum hourly wage to their employees of $10.10." That's simply talking about the contracts- the government has just as much right to enter into contracts with whatever conditions it wants as any private agency. It *also* would vastly reduce the profitability of (for instance) Janitorial service and Food service vendors to the Government, making such Government contracts less lucrative in the first place. I do not think he could force it on current contracts, and I do not think he could force it for sub-contractors (since their contract is not with the Fed Agency in question, but with the Contractor to that agency). Of course, all of that assumes some amount of respect for the Constitution and the Law. SCOAMT has proven he has none for either.

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 08:34 AM (PYAXX)

61

Well.... he does have a pen and a phone..... so it's legal I guess

 

Posted by: Truck Monkey at January 17, 2014 08:34 AM (32Ze2)

62 This means Burger King will get no more contracts from the federal government.

Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at January 17, 2014 08:34 AM (8ZskC)

63 I swear to all that is holy if I hear one more asshole talk about how you can't raise a family making $7.25 an hour at McD's I'll go from rage stroke to real stroke. Working the drive thru window isn't a career fuck nuggets. It's a career only if you own the franchise.

Posted by: rickb223 at January 17, 2014 08:35 AM (lUXJH)

64 Oh, yeah, this will really help the economy. Spread it around, baby, from the wagon pullers to the wagon riders. I love our government.

Posted by: Broken Window Fallacy at January 17, 2014 08:35 AM (pginn)

65 They'll force this on outside groups by decreeing that anyone who even walks past federal money must pay that wage.

Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at January 17, 2014 08:35 AM (uzmcT)

66 Could he legally raise his own salary with just a pen stroke?

What if he tried to lower the minimum wage across the board with a pen stroke?

I don't think he can do either, but we'll see.  I personally don't think the politics of raising the minimum wage of federal workers is a winner politically, there's a bipartisan feeling outside of the beltway that we're being drained for the new DC Aristocracy.  If he gets his hand slapped, it looks even worse.

If I were the Republican House, I'd write some ridiculous bill that raised the minimum wage, but put in a poison pill like the company automatically qualifies for an ObamaCare waiver.  Just to screw with them and take the issue away.

Posted by: McAdams at January 17, 2014 08:35 AM (ZVOAw)

67 Hear my decree!

Posted by: King Barack at January 17, 2014 08:35 AM (m2Izr)

68 Why are these robots that are in the news more and more always white? It must be a subconscious hate-the-black-president thing.

Posted by: and irresolute at January 17, 2014 08:35 AM (RqHWH)

69 The way this man is shutting down industry, we might be killing each other for that drive-through job in a few years. --- Hey, man, you've got room to move as a fry cook!

Posted by: Kevin at January 17, 2014 08:35 AM (/Crba)

70 True Fact : Barack Obama isn't qualified to work the Drive-Through Window.

Posted by: garrett at January 17, 2014 08:35 AM (ZSjd6)

71 This is the kind of "fair wage" bullshit the State of California has been forcing on its contractors for ages. 

Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at January 17, 2014 08:36 AM (8ZskC)

72 He probably *can* do it...

of course it renders the entire Omnibus worthless...

and frankly if he CAN do it why hasn't he already?

Posted by: sven10077 at January 17, 2014 08:36 AM (TE35l)

73 If he decreed that all government employees would be paid a maximum of $10.10 an hour, I'd be sanguine with that.

Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at January 17, 2014 08:36 AM (2oU2+)

74 First Black President - 'nuf said.

Posted by: Left Legal Establishment at January 17, 2014 08:36 AM (bNnI1)

75 So shall it be written, so shall it be done!

Posted by: King Barackankhamen at January 17, 2014 08:36 AM (DrWcr)

76 56 many union contracts use wages based on the multiplier of the federal minimum wage... Posted by: wilber at January 17, 2014 12:34 PM (b96e6) Not so many in right-to-work states, though. Usually, Obama's policies have "unintended" consequences that simply make people poor and dependent. But moving jobs in union states to right-to-work states? Sounds good to me.

Posted by: AmishDude at January 17, 2014 08:36 AM (T0NGe)

77 Can Obama order Federal Contractors to ban sugary soda drinks from their premises? Can Obama order them to only by organic food for their cafeteria. What business practices of federal contractors can Obama unilaterally control? Any once the Feds are controlling your daily business practices -- at what point are you now effectively a federal employee and not a contractor? Isn't that part of the IRS issue when independent contractors at Google and Microsoft sue to claim they are really employees and deserve stock options?

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at January 17, 2014 08:36 AM (ZPrif)

78 Years ago I worked for a hvac contractor on a federal contract.....they had to pay me union scale when I worked on that job.

Posted by: BignJames at January 17, 2014 08:37 AM (ZNQKl)

79 75 So shall it be written, so shall it be done! --- I declare the minimum wage raised, etc., etc., etc., people get paid more for their work!

Posted by: Barry, King Of Siam at January 17, 2014 08:37 AM (/Crba)

80 66 "Could he legally raise his own salary with just a pen stroke? What if he tried to lower the minimum wage across the board with a pen stroke?" Who is going to stop him? I doubt his Justice Department is going to rule that he did something illegal. Congress? Short of impeachment, they've got nothing. Only the media can stop a president bent on doing illegal shit.

Posted by: jwest at January 17, 2014 08:38 AM (u2a4R)

81 I have a feeling that this is a way to try and steer a bunch of money to union employees which will end up costing these contractors money and, likely, the taxpayers will have to pay for it. Brandon, that was my thoughts exactly. Shoot, why not just rid of all private sector companies? Why not just have one monolithic government employer? It could result in a lot of cost savings and reduce litigation. After all, look how well that is working in Cuba, North Korea and increasingly South America. We can all see what a glorious success it was in the USSR and China. Why not? Everyone gets a livable wage, plenty of time off (anyone up for a little MLK Day vaca?) and great job satisfaction as we labor in the knowledge that we are public servants working together for the good of the party.

Posted by: runningrn at January 17, 2014 08:38 AM (o6g4X)

82 ...'course, if he decreed all government bureaucrats would be beaten regularly with sticks no thinner than your thumb, I'd be sanguine with that, too.

Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at January 17, 2014 08:38 AM (2oU2+)

83 Years ago I worked for a hvac contractor on a federal contract.....they had to pay me union scale when I worked on that job. Were you asked to perform down to union standards to comply.

Posted by: garrett at January 17, 2014 08:38 AM (ZSjd6)

84 I just wish he would go Full On Hugo and get it over with. "I saw Full On Hugo open for Trabant at Lilith Fest" -Ambrose Bierce

Posted by: The Hobo Hooker, Waitress, Model, Actress, Wears Prada at January 17, 2014 08:39 AM (GeVLX)

85 I think the title of this horror movie is Bankrupt Us Faster Pussycat.

Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 17, 2014 08:39 AM (whKdw)

86 No, but I bet the people flipping burgers at the Burger King on base do. Solution: Hire only vendors! I had a manager at Microsoft tell me recently that "HeadCount" is as rare as a Unicorn these days. But if you search the programming jobs these days, you can barely find anything that isn't a Vendor or Contractor job at Microsoft. *HeadCount is shorthand for a full-time position. If you search the Microsoft Careers website, you can barely find any entry-level positions (entry-level being someone who has a couple of years of experience). Everything is five+ years of serious programming time that even a contractor of seven years probably doesn't have.

Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at January 17, 2014 08:39 AM (P7Wsr)

87 From The Hill article, it sounds like they want to create a "preference" for contractors who pay the higher wage, in effect locking out those paying actual minimum wage.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 17, 2014 08:39 AM (SY2Kh)

88 Would be very difficult to enforce as to prior contracts, but pretty easy to enforce as a matter of future contracts. Don't feel bad for the contractors, they will jack up their rates accordingly, and once again the taxpayers are left fitting the bill.

Posted by: Boone at January 17, 2014 08:39 AM (3p8HS)

89 There should be some kind of compromise where republicans can agree to an increase in the minimum wage if the employer is allowed to pay part of that increase in things like chicken nuggets or chalupas.

Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at January 17, 2014 08:39 AM (+lsX1)

90 >>But moving jobs in union states to right-to-work states? Sounds good to me.

*Ahem*
Not if we have anything to do with it.

Posted by: NLRB at January 17, 2014 08:39 AM (POpqt)

91 Were you asked to perform down to union standards to comply.

Posted by: garrett at January 17, 2014 12:38 PM (ZSjd6)


Yeah. You would have to change your sleeping patterns completely.

Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at January 17, 2014 08:39 AM (8ZskC)

92 This is not the hill to die on.

Posted by: John "Deeply Closeted" Boehner at January 17, 2014 08:40 AM (JQuNB)

93 Wait, would it apply to all the employees of a company that does any federal contracting? 

If so that would affect us...lol - Obama voters, all.

Posted by: Lady Billingsgate at January 17, 2014 08:40 AM (GdalM)

94 If Obama really wanted to fix this whole minimum wage issue, he'd propose raising the wage, THEN INDEXING IT TO INFLATION, like social security payments are currently. But that's not what the Democrats EVER propose, because it's not really about fixing the minimum wage, it's not about providing a "living wage" or even about fairness, it's about using the issue during election years to buy the votes of LIV's. More proof that DC politico's don't really want to SOLVE problems, they want to USE problems to beat the other side. Sad, sick and depressing....

Posted by: proudvastrightwingconspirator at January 17, 2014 08:40 AM (+UrNT)

95 I can't tell if this is just PR stunt that changes almost nothing, or some ass-backward way for Obama to payoff his voting base.

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at January 17, 2014 08:40 AM (ZPrif)

96 TFG should take some action on a bag of dicks.

Posted by: LIV at January 17, 2014 08:40 AM (Kkt/i)

97 Well, he just wants to make sure he's making a little more in his first job after being pResident.

Posted by: wth at January 17, 2014 08:40 AM (wAQA5)

98 its from his stash, yo

Posted by: thunderb at January 17, 2014 08:40 AM (zOTsN)

99 If you're a contractor of a government contractor, the government considers you a contractor so, yes, if President Pen orders an increase in minimum wage for federal contractors, it will hit all of their subs as well unless, of course, they go all-Obama and decide that the law doesn't apply to them.

Posted by: natasha at January 17, 2014 08:41 AM (pyYXJ)

100 My friends, you have nothing to fear with Barack Obama in the White House

Posted by: John McCain at January 17, 2014 08:41 AM (Pr6hk)

101 I, for one, have no problem with executive fiat. Can I keep my adopted children now?

Posted by: John Iscariot Roberts at January 17, 2014 08:41 AM (7ObY1)

102 The issue isn't really employees making minimum wage. The issue is union employees whose wages are minimum wage + x.

Posted by: Boone at January 17, 2014 08:41 AM (3p8HS)

103 87 : Hollowpoint at January 17, 2014 12:39 PM (SY2Kh)

Which still renders the omnibus pretty much meaningless

Posted by: sven10077 at January 17, 2014 08:42 AM (TE35l)

104 I will do as I want. But first you will blow me.

And by 'you' I mean 'Reggie'

Posted by: Barky at January 17, 2014 08:42 AM (27KAF)

105 19 1% of all workers make the minimum wage.
What % of federal contractors make the minimum?
I'd bet almost 0%.


There are a lot of us out here in flyover, doing little dipshit jobs for the feds who have employees making near-minimum.

Posted by: Lady Billingsgate at January 17, 2014 08:42 AM (GdalM)

106 I believe that this works out to a pay raise for union workers.

Seems to me that anyone doing work on a federal project has to certify that they are paying their employees the federal worker wage.
I'll bet hidden in TARP was requirements that they pay no less than the federal minimum wage.

Then, you have the union contracts that have automatic pay increases if the base wage (e.g. the minimum wage for the job) increases.

That, I think, is what is going on here.

Posted by: RoyalOil at January 17, 2014 08:43 AM (VjL9S)

107 95 I can't tell if this is just PR stunt that changes almost nothing, or some ass-backward way for Obama to payoff his voting base.

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at January 17, 2014 12:40 PM (ZPrif

 

Neither, it's a stunt to keep the headlines about Obama Fighting For The Working Man and not about Obamacare Fucking Up Everything.

 

I actually see nothing wrong with Obama doing this.  No company is forced to take federal contracts.  I doubt there are more than a handful of contractor employees making the minimum wage, but if Obama wants to do more Gesture Liberalism, let him.

Posted by: rockmom at January 17, 2014 08:43 AM (aBlZ1)

108 Exactly how many federal employees are making minimum wage ? I'm wagering not very many. Plus, if you want to raise the wages of federal workers, you don't have to raise the minimum wage to do it.

Posted by: deadrody at January 17, 2014 08:43 AM (aT8Zk)

109


This is so depressing.

Apparently, the first mistake of the government issuing "lucrative contracts" can be fixed by a second mistake where it forces others also to overpay.

Posted by: Prndl at January 17, 2014 08:44 AM (2Ynt1)

110 2016 gonna be very very interesting

Posted by: thunderb at January 17, 2014 08:44 AM (zOTsN)

111 Make it so.

Posted by: Starship captain Barack Luc Picardobama at January 17, 2014 08:45 AM (Hx5uv)

112 The issue isn't really employees making minimum wage. The issue is union employees whose wages are minimum wage + x.

Posted by: Boone at January 17, 2014 12:41 PM (3p8HS)

DING DING DING!!

Tell him what he's won Jay!

Posted by: RolandTHTG at January 17, 2014 08:45 AM (QM5S2)

113 105 Lady Billingsgate at January 17, 2014 12:42 PM (GdalM)

Correct ALL Kabuki...the GOP should offer student loan forgiveness indexed by cuts to the schools that OVERCHARGED for education and the future student "loans" being paid based on a flat 20% of Cr Hr $ rate just like they fuck Dr's with medicare medicaid...

of course...that won't happen b/c it'd require goring THEIR sacred cow

Posted by: sven10077 at January 17, 2014 08:45 AM (TE35l)

114 “Profitable corporations that receive lucrative contracts from the federal government should pay all of their workers a decent wage,” the lawmakers wrote. Yes, except the laws require the selection of the lowest bidder. And we're running trillion dollar deficits. Incoherence. Right there at the top of your menu, sir.

Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here)-also drooling imbecile incapable of doing algebra or something at January 17, 2014 08:45 AM (659DL)

115 Neither, it's a stunt to keep the headlines about Obama Fighting For The Working Man and not about Obamacare Fucking Up Everything.


Bingo.

Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at January 17, 2014 08:45 AM (8ZskC)

116 Why wouldn't he?  Who is going to stop him? 

Mitch McConnell, McCain, Graham, Boehner?


Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at January 17, 2014 08:45 AM (BZAd3)

117 Years ago I worked for a hvac contractor on a federal contract.....they had to pay me union scale when I worked on that job.

Posted by: BignJames


Courtesy of the Davis Bacon Act of 1931

Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at January 17, 2014 08:45 AM (nZiT2)

118 Posted by: John McCain at January 17, 2014 12:41 PM (Pr6hk)


Every time i see this in the comments I have a mini stroke.  Fucking John McCain. 

Posted by: PAgirlinNC at January 17, 2014 08:45 AM (mPKiR)

119 We would be better at communism than anyone else, just like we are mostly better at everything else. We could probably actually make communism work as designed, with just a few tweaks here and there. I'm gleefully hopeful that it would lead to a dull gray future for all of it's supporters. burn it!

Posted by: and irresolute at January 17, 2014 08:45 AM (RqHWH)

120 Exactly how many federal employees are making minimum wage ? I'm wagering not very many. Again, this isn't Federal Employees. I'm guessing *that* number approaches 0. This is about contractors- and that number is probably somewhat higher. Like I said- janitorial and food service vendors, for instance. I'm pretty sure that Lockheed pays its "Facilities Maintenance" staff (that is to say: janitors) little over minimum to start. So, yeah, this is a big F'n deal.

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 08:46 AM (PYAXX)

121 Exactly how many federal employees are making minimum wage ? I'm wagering not very many. Again, this isn't Federal Employees. I'm guessing *that* number approaches 0. This is about contractors- and that number is probably somewhat higher. Like I said- janitorial and food service vendors, for instance. I'm pretty sure that Lockheed pays its "Facilities Maintenance" staff (that is to say: janitors) little over minimum to start. So, yeah, this is a big F'n deal.

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 08:46 AM (PYAXX)

122 I doubt there are more than a handful of contractor employees making the minimum wage

I don't know.

Food service , cleaning, housekeeping,landscaping,daycare multiplied by every Federal building installation or rented office.

That's a LOT of pretty low paying jobs especially in right to work states.

Posted by: noone, really [/i] [/b] at January 17, 2014 08:46 AM (5ikDv)

123 I bet federal contractors would love it if the Obama  imposed a minimum wage hike on them.  They would pass the costs right back to the federal government by increasing their bid  prices. 

And who  pays for that increase  in the end?  Why you and me, of course.



Posted by: Marmo at January 17, 2014 08:46 AM (QW+AD)

124 Yay! My first double-post!

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 08:46 AM (PYAXX)

125

>>"But Republicans are cool to the plan, warning it could hurt the economy.>>

 

 

Translation:  we're gonna cave.

Posted by: rrpjr at January 17, 2014 08:46 AM (s/yC1)

126 Mitch McConnell, McCain, Graham, Boehner? Making fun of me isn't a way to help the American people. And it might make me cry.

Posted by: John "Deeply Closeted" Boehner at January 17, 2014 08:46 AM (JQuNB)

127 Anyone care to bet how many unionized "contractors" have their paper written so that the minimum pay for all clients is the same? Let's suppose Frank is a union contract knob polisher. His contract says KnobCo must pay him the same for every hour of work, regardless of the client. Frank may only put in 10 hours of knob-polishing for the government, but KnobCo must now pay him $10.10 for the other 30 he spends polishing knobs for various other fortune 500 types. Follow. The. Money. Mew

Posted by: acat at January 17, 2014 08:46 AM (4UkCP)

128 @AllenG

yes

Posted by: noone, really [/i] [/b] at January 17, 2014 08:46 AM (5ikDv)

129 You can say that again, Allen.

Posted by: garrett at January 17, 2014 08:47 AM (ZSjd6)

130 It *also* would vastly reduce the profitability of (for instance) Janitorial service and Food service vendors to the Government, making such Government contracts less lucrative in the first place.

More likely it would mean that contractors who do pay some workers minimum wage would simply increase their bids to reflect the higher operating costs.

I need not point out who will end up paying for the higher costs.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 17, 2014 08:47 AM (SY2Kh)

131 95 - Both

Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at January 17, 2014 08:48 AM (7mQyC)

132 Good point. Main effect of minimum wage is to empty out rural and small town America and force everyone to move to the big cities where the Left controls everything. Min. wages are always about protecting the ruling class from wage competition.

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at January 17, 2014 08:48 AM (ZPrif)

133 Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 17, 2014 12:47 PM (SY2Kh) So many appellations for this President, why not add one more? President BOHICA.

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 08:48 AM (PYAXX)

134 Given that Davis-Bacon has been the law for about 80 years what exactly does this proposal do?

Posted by: JackStraw at January 17, 2014 08:48 AM (g1DWB)

135 Downer of the day: the Establishment GOOP is so downhearted at Krispie Kreme's trouble that they are considering an encore from Mitt.

Posted by: WalrusRex at January 17, 2014 08:48 AM (Hx5uv)

136 130 - weeeeeeeeeee... time to print some more dollars!

Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at January 17, 2014 08:49 AM (7mQyC)

137 But despite that trying-to-be-fair impulse, I'd still like to see legal opinions on this.


My legal opinion is that Obama is a lazy, Marxist, America-hating piece of shit.

Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at January 17, 2014 08:49 AM (8ZskC)

138 Which still renders the omnibus pretty much meaningless

I'm not a lawyer or even a Constitutional Law lecturer, but I have the impression that such an EO likely would pass muster.  Or at least have precedent.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 17, 2014 08:49 AM (SY2Kh)

139 Downer of the day: the Establishment GOOP is so downhearted at Krispie Kreme's trouble that they are considering an encore from Mitt.


Second look, my friendssshh?

Posted by: John McCain at January 17, 2014 08:50 AM (8ZskC)

140 How many federal workers make close to the current minimum wage?

I bet not many.

Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at January 17, 2014 08:50 AM (bUvM7)

141 Why wouldn't he? Who is going to stop him?

Mitch McConnell, McCain, Graham, Boehner?
-
His conscience?

Posted by: WalrusRex at January 17, 2014 08:50 AM (Hx5uv)

142 Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at January 17, 2014 12:49 PM (7mQyC) It's going to be really... interesting... when interest rates finally go back up. We're printing money like crazy. Despite that, we're in a deflationary spiral. Interest rates are still near 0. What happens when that last point changes to "Interest rates are at 2%?" What happens when that last point changes to "Interest rates pushes past 5% today..."

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 08:50 AM (PYAXX)

143 'bout damn time. Nah I fttn ta git sum green!

Posted by: Peggy Joseph at January 17, 2014 08:50 AM (fWAjv)

144 116" Why wouldn't he? Who is going to stop him? Mitch McConnell, McCain, Graham, Boehner?" What are they going to do? Send him a strong "Sense of the Senate" letter? I just hope whoever we get to run for president in 2016 is taking notes on how to do shit.

Posted by: jwest at January 17, 2014 08:50 AM (u2a4R)

145 138 - Doesn't much matter anymore.

Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at January 17, 2014 08:51 AM (7mQyC)

146 My legal opinion is that Obama is a lazy, Marxist, America-hating piece of shit. Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at January 17, 2014 12:49 PM (8ZskC) Sustained. *packs nutritious snacks for imminent under the desk sojourn*

Posted by: alexthechick - Come to us, oh mighty SMOD at January 17, 2014 08:51 AM (VtjlW)

147 Bob Dole is tanned, rested and zzzzzzzzz...

Posted by: Bob Dole [/i] [/b] at January 17, 2014 08:51 AM (5ikDv)

148 Thanks to whomever fixed that frontpage issue.

Posted by: garrett at January 17, 2014 08:51 AM (ZSjd6)

149 Listen, this shouldn't be a big problem.  I'm sure there are veterans out there who still have benefits left, so with Republican support they should be able to raid those benefits and pay for the whole thing!

Easy peazy.

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at January 17, 2014 08:51 AM (BZAd3)

150

15: "Can Obama order Federal Contractors to pay 2x the going rate for gasoline and fossil fuels as a way to force them to use more "green" energy?"

 

See Executive Order 13423.

 

He may not be able ot order them to pay more for gas (directly), but he can order that they only use vehicle type X.

Posted by: Azenogoth (Freedom or Fire) at January 17, 2014 08:51 AM (v6cwT)

151 Boehner's got a constitution but he doesn't have the owner's manual.

Posted by: WalrusRex at January 17, 2014 08:52 AM (Hx5uv)

152

OT

 

the JEF promising not to spy on foreigners anymore, coupled with this, which came out yesterday

 

President Obama's Department of Justice wants to "expand its definition of racial profiling" so that federal agents will no longer be able to consider religion, national origin, or gender/sexual orientation in their investigations...

ACLU national security attorney Hina Shamsi praised the proposed changes, saying: "Putting an end to [these profiling techniques] not only comports with the Constitution, it would put real teeth to the F.B.I.'s claims that it wants better relationships with minorities."

 

not a coincidence

Posted by: thunderb at January 17, 2014 08:52 AM (zOTsN)

153 obamacare, raise the minimum wage, let the epa go hog wild on global warming and anything else the epa-crats want to go after....

nice country we had. bye.

Posted by: Mallfly at January 17, 2014 08:52 AM (bJm7W)

154 Min. wages are always about protecting the ruling class from wage competition. Here's how my Econ Professor explained it to me: If a job can be done by a low-skilled worker who charges $5.00 less per hour than a skilled worker, the owner will hire the low-skilled worker. If however the owner is forced to pay $5.00 more per hour, you'll go with the skilled worker, because you want the added value of the experienced and skilled employee. So as you all understand, it actually harms the low-skilled person, and benefits the Union person.

Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at January 17, 2014 08:52 AM (P7Wsr)

155 I'm pretty sure that Lockheed pays its "Facilities Maintenance" staff (that is to say: janitors) little over minimum to start.


I don't know, my father used to have a friend who worked for Lockheed, I don't know what his exact title was but he pretty much went around changing light bulbs and he made pretty decent money.

Posted by: Adam at January 17, 2014 08:52 AM (Aif/5)

156 It's almost like he does whatever the f*ck he pleases and no one can stop him because he has a complicit media and no genuine opposition party.

Posted by: Mega at January 17, 2014 08:53 AM (hHFOx)

157 Bob Dole is tanned, rested and zzzzzzzzz...
-
My question is did he get one of those government penis pumps?

Posted by: WalrusRex at January 17, 2014 08:53 AM (Hx5uv)

158 President Obama's Department of Justice wants to "expand its definition of racial profiling" so that federal agents will no longer be able to consider religion, national origin, or gender/sexual orientation in their investigations... You know, AtC... I was going to say you probably weren't going to have to hide. But this *may* change that...

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 08:53 AM (PYAXX)

159 "What happens when that last point changes to "Interest rates pushes past 5% today..." --- The proverbial hell breaks loose and that fan becomes inundated with feces.

Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at January 17, 2014 08:53 AM (7mQyC)

160 GOP should make this the year of the lame duck. what the fuck is going on with amnesty? Does anyone in the party listen to anyone who votes?

Posted by: oeJay44incday at January 17, 2014 08:53 AM (QxSug)

161 I don't know, my father used to have a friend who worked for Lockheed, I don't know what his exact title was but he pretty much went around changing light bulbs and he made pretty decent money.


Was he Polish, and if so, how large was his crew?

Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at January 17, 2014 08:54 AM (8ZskC)

162 Dammit. At this rate I'll be mainlining Mountain Dew to remain functional today, and I swore that crap off 16 years ago. This whole "responsible" crap is vastly overrated.

Posted by: Brother Cavil, chillin' like a villain at January 17, 2014 08:54 AM (naUcP)

163

Joe Biden walks into a bar  and greets the bartender with a joyous hug and hello.

 

The bartender  says,  "  Why are you so happy today?"

 

Biden replies ,   "  I just heard my boss say he is going to give me a raise to $10.10 an hour!! "

Posted by: polynikes at January 17, 2014 08:54 AM (m2CN7)

164

As near as I can tell, he is going to go after the recent budget mess where retired Veterans will be losing raises, right?

We really do not deserve him.

Posted by: Village Idiot's Apprentice at January 17, 2014 08:54 AM (kFCo1)

165 Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 12:50 PM (PYAXX) Crystal ball predicts http://tinyurl.com/omrx9h9

Posted by: RWC at January 17, 2014 08:54 AM (fWAjv)

166 I don't know, my father used to have a friend who worked for Lockheed, I don't know what his exact title was but he pretty much went around changing light bulbs and he made pretty decent money. One of my friends from church is one of the Facilities Managers. STARTING is not much higher than minimum. If you stay around very long, that goes up relatively quickly. He won't say it in these terms, but I'm pretty sure it has to do with the union contracts.

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 08:54 AM (PYAXX)

167 and again, bravo to the GOP in Congress for not using omnibus bill to cut spending. Here's something I noticed: Whenever the GOP tries to negotiate, the DNC acts like the GOP is telling the country to drop dead. But alas, the DNC fan fiction on the horrors of the shutdiown for the GOP and the GOP's dickless nature has made any budget battle completely one sided.

Posted by: oeJay44incday at January 17, 2014 08:55 AM (QxSug)

168 What happens when that last point changes to "Interest rates are at 2%?" What happens when that last point changes to "Interest rates pushes past 5% today..." sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss. //Fuse on Employer Mandate.

Posted by: rickb223 at January 17, 2014 08:55 AM (lUXJH)

169 "156 It's almost like he does whatever the f*ck he pleases and no one can stop him because he has a complicit media and no genuine opposition party." ---- What's this "almost like" sh1t?

Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at January 17, 2014 08:55 AM (7mQyC)

170 119 We would be better at communism than anyone else, just like we are mostly better at everything else. We could probably actually make communism work as designed, with just a few tweaks here and there. I'm gleefully hopeful that it would lead to a dull gray future for all of it's supporters. burn it! Posted by: and irresolute at January 17, 2014 12:45 PM (RqHWH) Per Marx and Lenin, communism requires at a minimum 10% of the population being killed and the practice of genocide.

Posted by: Dr. Schlomo Pugberg at January 17, 2014 08:55 AM (Qev5V)

171 Posted by: RWC at January 17, 2014 12:54 PM (fWAjv) Yeah... I'm thinking it'll be worse than that...

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 08:55 AM (PYAXX)

172 That's a LOT of pretty low paying jobs especially in right to work states. If I recall correctly (FU acronyms). Didn't congress and the executive branches exempt themselves from paying the minimum wage?

Posted by: The Hobo Hooker, Waitress, Model, Actress, Wears Prada at January 17, 2014 08:55 AM (GeVLX)

173 President Obama's Department of Justice wants to "expand its definition of racial profiling" so that federal agents will no longer be able to consider religion, national origin, or gender/sexual orientation in their investigations...
-
'Cause there's so many chick serial killer rapists out there.  That and Seventh Day Adventist mad bombers.

Posted by: WalrusRex at January 17, 2014 08:55 AM (Hx5uv)

174 Forget it, Jake. It's You're Fucked town.

Posted by: Fuck the GOP at January 17, 2014 08:56 AM (JQuNB)

175 Weren't the original state min. wages passed to try and keep blacks from moving North and taking factory jobs from whites? And then it was nationalized to prevent companies from moving South to hire the cheap labor? Blacks were moving North looking for work and the States wanted to prevent companies from hiring them and reduce the incentive to move North.

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at January 17, 2014 08:56 AM (ZPrif)

176 Evil only happens when good men stand by and doing nothing. Defund the government!

Posted by: Iblis at January 17, 2014 08:56 AM (NVFTu)

177 The Federal Pay scale is not created by the Executive, as it PAYS people... Congress is in charge of spending money....

Posted by: Romeo13 at January 17, 2014 08:56 AM (lZBBB)

178 Obama will order the minimum wage increase and a few months from now he will say that he didn't know anything about it and only read about it in the newspapers like the rest of is pissants.

Like this:

http://tinyurl.com/lgnevq9

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at January 17, 2014 08:56 AM (BZAd3)

179 Fortunately, I have a little something to help me with the day's decisions... http://tinyurl.com/7d66ae

Posted by: Brother Cavil, chillin' like a villain at January 17, 2014 08:56 AM (naUcP)

180 106 I believe that this works out to a pay raise for union workers.


ding ding ding..... we have a winner

Posted by: Jimmy Hoffa at January 17, 2014 08:56 AM (Pr6hk)

181 "Does anyone in the party listen to anyone who votes?" ----- Hahahahahaha what a quaint thought.

Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at January 17, 2014 08:56 AM (7mQyC)

182 Interesting.  His 6th failed year as president is going to be a "year of action."  Wonder what will happen to these executive orders once a Republican gets in office.

Posted by: Heralder at January 17, 2014 08:56 AM (/Mxso)

183 Per Marx and Lenin, communism requires at a minimum 10% of the population being killed and the practice of genocide.



We view that as a feature, not a bug.

Posted by: Weather Underground at January 17, 2014 08:56 AM (Aif/5)

184

160. <<what the fuck is going on with amnesty?

Does anyone in the party listen to anyone who votes?>>

 

 

Check this out.

http://tinyurl.com/kzjzzkr

 

Posted by: rrpjr at January 17, 2014 08:57 AM (s/yC1)

185 Correct ALL Kabuki...the GOP should offer student loan forgiveness indexed by cuts to the schools that OVERCHARGED for education and the future student "loans" being paid based on a flat 20% of Cr Hr $ rate just like they fuck Dr's with medicare medicaid..



????????????????????????wtf?

Posted by: Lady Billingsgate at January 17, 2014 08:57 AM (GdalM)

186 Yeah... I'm thinking it'll be worse than that... Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 12:55 PM (PYAXX) That's just for a hamburger. Perhaps look into wheel-barrow futures.

Posted by: RWC at January 17, 2014 08:57 AM (fWAjv)

187 So as you all understand, it actually harms the low-skilled person, and benefits the Union person. Objection yer honor! Facts not in evidence, re; Union person being skilled.

Posted by: rickb223 at January 17, 2014 08:58 AM (lUXJH)

188 Per Marx and Lenin, communism requires at a minimum 10% of the population being killed and the practice of genocide. Mention that to a just out of college leftist tw*t and they'll shrug their shoulders like killing 30MM people is no big deal.

Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at January 17, 2014 08:58 AM (P7Wsr)

189 164 Village Idiot's Apprentice at January 17, 2014 12:54 PM (kFCo1)

No...

I called it here long ago the ONLY group who will ever get cut is the Veteran

Posted by: sven10077 at January 17, 2014 08:58 AM (TE35l)

190 I can't believe no one in the WH understands what this will actually do to businesses, especially with the (expensive) Obamacare employer mandate looming.

Posted by: Lizzy at January 17, 2014 12:29 PM (POpqt)

Oh, they understand perfectly.

Posted by: Washington Nearsider at January 17, 2014 08:58 AM (fwARV)

191 indexed by cuts to the schools that OVERCHARGED for education and the Errr... what? Define "overcharged for education," please.

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 08:58 AM (PYAXX)

192 And.... because Rage meter is still pegged.... He will do this, while still screwing over Retired Vets... Oh... and according to AP... John Bonehead said he has no interest in 'fixing' the Ret. Vet problem... ergo... it was the decision of the 'Leaders' of the GOP, to screw Vets... and Vets only.... When you break Faith with those who defend you.... who will defend you in the future?

Posted by: Romeo13 at January 17, 2014 08:58 AM (lZBBB)

193 I no longer have any hope for this country, and it's only January

Posted by: Null at January 17, 2014 08:58 AM (xjpRj)

194 Wonder what will happen to these executive orders once a Republican gets in office. Precisely nothing.

Posted by: Fuck the GOP at January 17, 2014 08:59 AM (JQuNB)

195 Oh, they understand perfectly. Posted by: Washington Nearsider at January 17, 2014 12:58 PM (fwARV) It makes much more sense once you accept that they really do want us all destitute and dependent upon government for every need.

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 08:59 AM (PYAXX)

196 Was he Polish, and if so, how large was his crew?

Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at January 17, 2014 12:54 PM (8ZskC)

 

Okay,  I will now add  to  my schitck to How Many Lightbulbs.....

 

This will be a  more  difficult  challenge.   I have no where to go but up anyway.  

Posted by: polynikes at January 17, 2014 08:59 AM (m2CN7)

197 "Wonder what will happen to these executive orders once a Republican gets in office." --- The media will jump on each one with words like "unprecedented", "unconstitutional", "authoritarian", "highly partisan".

Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at January 17, 2014 08:59 AM (7mQyC)

198
Hey, can we get in on this action?

Posted by: SDS at January 17, 2014 08:59 AM (pJF+c)

199 142 It's going to be really... interesting... when interest rates finally go back up.
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 12:50 PM (PYAXX)

I've been hearing "interest rates are going to go up" for the past five years.
When is it going to happen?

Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at January 17, 2014 08:59 AM (m2Izr)

200 You might even get that fatuous quote "To make an omelet you have to break a few eggs."

Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at January 17, 2014 09:00 AM (P7Wsr)

201 Ahhh, it's good to be [a communist, ghey, retarded, incompetent, lying] King [who will never be called on anything by the press].

Posted by: Quothe Obama at January 17, 2014 09:00 AM (TM1p8)

202

Bow before me, earthlings, or I will allow this to continue.

Posted by: SMOD at January 17, 2014 09:00 AM (Pr6hk)

203
We're lookin' to work for Obama and bash a few cracker heads!

Posted by: Black Panther's at January 17, 2014 09:00 AM (pJF+c)

204 Bow before me, earthlings, or I will allow this to continue.

Posted by: SMOD at January 17, 2014 01:00 PM (Pr6hk)

 

*grovels subserviently*

Posted by: Insomniac at January 17, 2014 09:01 AM (DrWcr)

205 193 I no longer have any hope for this country, and it's only January" --- I welcome you to the club. Member since 2007

Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at January 17, 2014 09:01 AM (7mQyC)

206 Check this out. http://tinyurl.com/kzjzzkr I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "For crying out load, will there ever be a time when the expression: At least it can't get any worse" come close to being true?"

Posted by: The Hobo Hooker, Waitress, Model, Actress, Wears Prada at January 17, 2014 09:01 AM (GeVLX)

207 I've been hearing "interest rates are going to go up" for the past five years. When is it going to happen? When we can least afford it.

Posted by: rickb223 at January 17, 2014 09:01 AM (lUXJH)

208 One good thing about obamacare will be to keep those damned Canucks from coming down here and using up all of our good healthcare!

http://tinyurl.com/m2ybr58

Because now our healthcare will be as bad as yours! 

Take that you bastards.

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at January 17, 2014 09:01 AM (BZAd3)

209 I hate to inform you, but the end of this pipe is beyond the Maine border.

Posted by: Andy Dufresne at January 17, 2014 09:02 AM (Pr6hk)

210 $10.10 is not a livable wage, Obama is just hurting poor people by not raising the minimum wage to $45 an hour.

Posted by: Huffington Post at January 17, 2014 09:02 AM (obXkJ)

211 I've been hearing "interest rates are going to go up" for the past five years. When is it going to happen? --- When the Fed can no longer print money. At that point, the amount of interest being paid by the Feds on outstanding bonds rises dramatically and shit meets fan.

Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at January 17, 2014 09:02 AM (/Crba)

212 When is it going to happen? That's a good question, and I don't have an answer. But the fact is they will, at some point, go back up. At some point, the loose monetary policy *will* cause lending to pick up, which will cause interest rates to go back up. Actually- they are inching back up even now, just slowly enough and in few enough sectors that we're not noticing very much. Mortgages, for instance, have crept slowly back up. They're still "near historic lows" but that means they're no longer *at* "historic lows."

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 09:02 AM (PYAXX)

213 because load is kind like loud or something

Posted by: The Hobo Hooker, Waitress, Model, Actress, Wears Prada at January 17, 2014 09:02 AM (GeVLX)

214

I'm hearing Obama wants to outsource, or establish an overseer on the NSA independent of that agency - am I missing something, or does that result in even less accountability under law?

Posted by: Bigby's Semaphore Hands at January 17, 2014 09:02 AM (3ZtZW)

215 My prediction?  PAIN

Posted by: Barry 'Clubber Lang' Soetoro at January 17, 2014 09:02 AM (Pr6hk)

216 My take is that since all appropriation bills are suppose to start in the House (that silly thing called the Constitution for all you lefty trollers), this is nothing more than a gambit to retake the House.

If that happens, he'll have no problems if Congress raises it to $100/hr.

Posted by: John P. Squibob at January 17, 2014 09:02 AM (DQZLr)

217 192 When you break Faith with those who defend you.... who will defend you in the future?  Posted by: Romeo13 at January 17, 2014 12:58 PM (lZBBB)
That's when they bring back the draft.

Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at January 17, 2014 09:03 AM (m2Izr)

218 I made up a joke.  Hillary Clinton crawls into a bar . . .

That's as far as I've gotten.

Posted by: WalrusRex at January 17, 2014 09:03 AM (Hx5uv)

219 WalrusRex @1-
I don't know if you are familiar with the old South. You know, Stephen Foster, Way Down Upon The Swanee River, Old Black Joe, etc. But the word 'pone' could be considered raaayyycist. Or you may have meat a piece of cornbread.

Posted by: Erowmero at January 17, 2014 09:03 AM (OONaw)

220 At that point, the amount of interest being paid by the Feds on outstanding bonds rises dramatically and shit meets fan.



That trillion dollar platinum coin idea sounds better every day.


Posted by: EC at January 17, 2014 09:03 AM (GQ8sn)

221 "For crying out load, will there ever be a time when the expression: At least it can't get any worse" come close to being true?"

Posted by: The Hobo Hooker, Waitress, Model, Actress, Wears Prada at January 17, 2014 01:01 PM (GeVLX)

Not as long as Murphy lives.

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at January 17, 2014 09:03 AM (BZAd3)

222 "When is it going to happen?" --- When they figure out a way to do it without economically destroying 1/3rd of the planet.... so you've probably got some time.

Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at January 17, 2014 09:03 AM (7mQyC)

223 Legal?  This is the 'Badges, Wee Don't Neeeed No Steeenkin' Badges' Administration, remember? 

Posted by: BurtTC at January 17, 2014 09:03 AM (BeSEI)

224 The media will jump on each one with words like "unprecedented", "unconstitutional", "authoritarian", "highly partisan". Yep. Every time Obama does something awful, some commenter will say something like, "Well, that just means we get to do it too." NO! How many times did Clinton do something they excoriated Bush for?

Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at January 17, 2014 09:03 AM (P7Wsr)

225

This is likely permissible.  Which does nothing more than to underline how out of control powerful the executive branch has become.

 

This could not be used on past contracts or existing contracts, however.

Posted by: prescient11 at January 17, 2014 09:03 AM (tVTLU)

226 200 You might even get that fatuous quote "To make an omelet you have to break a few eggs." --- You rang, Mr. Harada?

Posted by: Toyo Harada's Eggbreakers at January 17, 2014 09:03 AM (/Crba)

227 185 Lady Billingsgate at January 17, 2014 12:57 PM (GdalM)

Exactly what I said...

Mirror Universe John Boehner should have the safest seated Republican go batshit populist right back at giggles...

The young are bitching about their loans they want student loan forgiveness so give it to the little darlings, as long as you tie in the use of student loans by a campus to a Federal Flat rate....

say 60 bucks a credit hour for future US Citizen students...

The Feds have been fucking doctors on Medicare and Medicaid paid outs for decades....it is why private insurance goes up.

Barky got elected in part because schools swim in taxpayer backed "free money" and the College educator class backs communism damn near to the 9s...

Gore his fucking cow for a change and point out that college cost has gone up six fold since I was in the 9th grade.

"We Republicans think this is a fucking tragedy for the poor and middle class' kids to be tied down to these HORRIBLE loans...so under the DERP ACT we will control college costs by making schools voluntarily agree to price controls if they accept or get ANY Federal aid"

"Fairness for America and the Kids"

Posted by: sven10077 at January 17, 2014 09:04 AM (TE35l)

228 I'm hearing Obama wants to outsource, or establish an overseer on the NSA independent of that agency - am I missing something, or does that result in even less accountability under law?



He'll will outsource it to the Chinese.

Posted by: EC at January 17, 2014 09:04 AM (GQ8sn)

229 >>I can't believe no one in the WH understands what this will actually do to businesses, especially with the (expensive) Obamacare employer mandate looming. Davis-Bacon, which is essentially what this proposal modifies, has been suspended 4 times. Once by FDR himself who championed this dumbass law right in the middle of the Great Depression because he wanted to put more people back to work. In fact, every time it was suspended it was because presidents wanted to put more people back to work. Of course they know.

Posted by: JackStraw at January 17, 2014 09:04 AM (g1DWB)

230 214  I'm hearing Obama wants to outsource, or establish an overseer on the NSA independent of that agency - am I missing something, or does that result in even less accountability under law?

Posted by: Bigby's Semaphore Hands at January 17, 2014 01:02 PM (3ZtZW)



An NSA Czar, who answers only to Mr. Soros


Posted by: Barack O'Stalin at January 17, 2014 09:04 AM (Pr6hk)

231 That's when they bring back the draft.

Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at January 17, 2014 01:03 PM (m2Izr)

Never happen. 

Congress would have to say one of two mutually exclusive things:
1 - Men and women are equal, therefore, women will be drafted.
2 - Men and women are not equal, therefore women will not be drafted.

What politician is going to say either of those things in public?

Posted by: Washington Nearsider at January 17, 2014 09:04 AM (fwARV)

232 "That trillion dollar platinum coin idea sounds better every day." --- Ha ha, soon enough we're gonna need more then a pocket full of those.

Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at January 17, 2014 09:04 AM (7mQyC)

233 So I have a relative going through treatments that Obama's death panels will no doubt block in the future. Terminal brain tumor. Older patient. The treatments may extend life a few weeks or months. Or none at all. Tiny, tiny chance it could be a year or more. Nobody knows exactly. So you do what you can and hope for the best, but statistically the odds are very poor. Treatments are expensive. Chemo. Radiation. Expensive doctors. Expensive machines. Expensive drugs. In the future it will just be morphine and hospice. Morphine is cheap.

Posted by: Flatbush Joe at January 17, 2014 09:04 AM (ZPrif)

234 When they figure out a way to do it without economically destroying 1/3rd of the planet.... so you've probably got some time. 1/3? That's all? I think it's much worse than that. Or do you mean "when they figure out a way to do it which will spare at least 1/3 of the planet?"

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 09:04 AM (PYAXX)

235 Take him to court, tie him up in knots, confound him, confuse him, punish him. This is a Republic not a Monarchy. Send a message or get the fuck out of the way

Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 17, 2014 12:31 PM (t3UFN)

 

I agree wholeheartedly but to do those very necessary things we need an opposition party.

 

I privately refer to the GOP Establishment as Whig Republicans. Like the old Whigs, they're fearful of confronting the Democrats partly because they lack conviction and partly because they're yellow. They won't fight. They're fearful and timid and in the pockets of big money corporate donors who are, as a class, largely apolitical and simply view their control of the GOP as a means to advance their agenda, which may or may not be aligned with the good of the country.  I wouldn't call them patriots, especially since they're the ones primarily responsible for promoting amnesty for the sake of cheap labor, working Americans be damned.

 

Contrary to popular conceptions, Big Business, by and large, loves them some Mussolini-style socialism. Only those with the resources great enough to matter in terms of money or political clout are allowed access to the ruling inner circles. All others are shut out.

Posted by: troyriser at January 17, 2014 09:04 AM (V9ol4)

236 218 -

Chicken.  Dildo.  Hillary.  Some assembly required.

Now make with the funny. 

Posted by: BurtTC at January 17, 2014 09:05 AM (BeSEI)

237

"It's Cavin' In Time !!!"

 

/ John "The Thing" Boehner

Posted by: ScoggDog at January 17, 2014 09:05 AM (cM7hk)

238 He's basically been doing this to Insurance companies since October, telling them what to do in violation of the law. And the GOP retreats, content to win a few meaningless seats in November.

Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 17, 2014 09:05 AM (5tpzF)

239 My take is that since all appropriation bills are suppose to start in the House (that silly thing called the Constitution....) More like a guidelines rather than rules, yarrrrr

Posted by: The Hobo Hooker, Waitress, Model, Actress, Wears Prada at January 17, 2014 09:05 AM (GeVLX)

240

192: "When you break Faith with those who defend you.... who will defend you in the future?"

 

Judging by the response to Hoover's crushing of the Bonus Army, this won't affect much.

 

Besides, who can stomach staying untill retirement anymore?

Posted by: Azenogoth (Freedom or Fire) at January 17, 2014 09:05 AM (OJn3e)

241 Bow before me, earthlings, or I will allow this to continue. Posted by: SMOD F*** off, I got this.

Posted by: Yellowstone Caldera at January 17, 2014 09:06 AM (naUcP)

242 "For crying out load, will there ever be a time when the expression: At least it can't get any worse" come close to being true?" In the deepest darkest holes in Stalin's Russia, it might have been true at times. Otherwise, it can always get worse.

Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at January 17, 2014 09:06 AM (P7Wsr)

243

Barry, the camps will be ready by January 2015

Posted by: Bill Ayers at January 17, 2014 09:06 AM (Pr6hk)

244 I made up a joke. Hillary Clinton crawls into a bar . . .

That's as far as I've gotten.

Posted by: WalrusRex at January 17, 2014 01:03 PM (Hx5uv)

 

The bartender says,  " Ma'am , why are you crawling on the floor"

 

Clinton says "  I'm dodging gun fire.  Can't you hear it?"

Posted by: polynikes at January 17, 2014 09:06 AM (m2CN7)

245 In the future it will just be morphine and hospice. Morphine is cheap. But in the mean time, it's Soma and Feelies

Posted by: The Hobo Hooker, Waitress, Model, Actress, Wears Prada at January 17, 2014 09:07 AM (GeVLX)

246 What happens when that last point changes to "Interest rates are at 2%?"

What happens when that last point changes to "Interest rates pushes past 5% today..."
=======
That's when the burning starts.

That's what is so scary: 100% of federal revenue, at that point, goes merely to pay the interest on debt.
And that, that accelerates the debt spiral of death.
Because then, 100% of spending--grannies Social Security check, included--is borrowed.

In the 1970's people were buying houses on a note bearing 18% interest . . . .

We are hurtling at super-sonic speeds towards "good credit, no credit? Doesn't fucking matter--nobody can afford to borrow."

And, as many pointed out yesterday, the realtors are scrambling to bankrupt as many people as they can right now before that happens. 'Cause they know damned good and well what is coming.

Our Congress ain't the only ones lighting fires left and right, looting as much as they can and then getting the hell out of town.



Posted by: RoyalOil at January 17, 2014 09:07 AM (VjL9S)

247 214 - You're not missing anything.

Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at January 17, 2014 09:07 AM (7mQyC)

248 I think we're gonna need a bigger boat.

Posted by: Chief Brodie at January 17, 2014 09:07 AM (Pr6hk)

249 This post is a metaphor for the establishment/Tea Party relationship: ace thinking its no big, but still dissing it cause of his commenter base thinking bland EOs are fascist oppression

Posted by: JL at January 17, 2014 09:07 AM (75uHN)

250 191 AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 12:58 PM (PYAXX)

Oh Allen I *do not* believe it, well I do but I don't think anyone coerced the little fuckers with anything besides too big a loan for too long a shot at success...

but listen to the little bastards...they think the loans are TOO big, they think the schools LIED to them....

fine use that to buy them off just like LBJ bought the blacks.

Weaponize his sacred cows' wounded detritus and use it to gore his fucking sacred cow for a change.

Posted by: sven10077 at January 17, 2014 09:07 AM (TE35l)

251 Congress would have to say one of two mutually exclusive things: 1 - Men and women are equal, therefore, women will be drafted. 2 - Men and women are not equal, therefore women will not be drafted. What politician is going to say either of those things in public? Posted by: Washington Nearsider Pubbies would be able to find one Aiken-like idiot.

Posted by: rickb223 at January 17, 2014 09:07 AM (lUXJH)

252 235 Take him to court, tie him up in knots, confound him, confuse him, punish him. This is a Republic not a Monarchy. Send a message or get the fuck out of the way Posted by: Nevergiveup at January 17, 2014 12:31 PM (t3UFN) We no longer have a republic.

Posted by: Fuck the GOP at January 17, 2014 09:07 AM (JQuNB)

253 237 "It's Cavin' In Time !!!" / John "The Thing" Boehner --- We're more likely to see Boehner sound like something out of John Carpenter's The Thing or the 1978 version of Body Snatchers. *points, mouth drops open, unearthly wail comes out*

Posted by: Toyo Harada's Eggbreakers at January 17, 2014 09:08 AM (/Crba)

254 246 - Bingo

Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at January 17, 2014 09:08 AM (7mQyC)

255 249 JL at January 17, 2014 01:07 PM (75uHN)

Fuckhead, how you been?

I'd be thrilled to read your histrionics under Bush.

Posted by: sven10077 at January 17, 2014 09:08 AM (TE35l)

256 "If you want an image of the future, imagine a boot, stamping on a human face, for all eternity." -1984, soon to be 'newsspeaked' into a love story with Kristen Stewart.

Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at January 17, 2014 09:08 AM (5tpzF)

257 248 - Much much bigger.

Posted by: ThisBeingMilt at January 17, 2014 09:09 AM (7mQyC)

258 I've been hearing "interest rates are going to go up" for the past five years.
When is it going to happen?

Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr.


When credit and wages pick up -> inflation -> bond market adjusts upwards -> Fed has to raise rates -> rinse &amp; repeat.

Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i] [/b] at January 17, 2014 09:09 AM (nZiT2)

259 WARNING WARNING There is a new thread. That which is seen cannot be unseen. *hurls self in front of Horde* It's too late for me. Go. Save yourselves!

Posted by: alexthechick - Come to us, oh mighty SMOD at January 17, 2014 09:09 AM (VtjlW)

260

That's when they bring back the draft.

Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at January 17, 2014 01:03 PM (m2Izr)

Never happen.

 

===============

 

Also: Not required. Drafts necessarily mean the Army had tooled down at some point to a peacetime level. It also means that passing a Draft requires foresight, as in "war's coming, better saddle up". Interesting that the WW2 Draft was enacted *prior* to Pearl Harbor, no? Neither cases obtain these days.

Posted by: Bigby's Semaphore Hands at January 17, 2014 09:09 AM (3ZtZW)

261 Kid signed up for selective service this week. He's grown up with the girls can do everything generation so he wonders why girls aren't required to register.

Posted by: NCKate at January 17, 2014 09:09 AM (x6fKj)

262 "If you want an image of the future, imagine a boot, stamping on a human face, for all eternity." -1984, soon to be 'newsspeaked' into a love story with Kristen Stewart.


"If you want an image of the future, imagine a smelly cooter, stamping on a human face, for all eternity." -Twilight 1984.


Posted by: EC at January 17, 2014 09:10 AM (GQ8sn)

263 Weaponize his sacred cows' wounded detritus and use it to gore his fucking sacred cow for a change. Ah. I see what you're saying. I don't know that I *agree* but it makes more sense now.

Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 09:10 AM (PYAXX)

264 "If you want an image of the future, imagine a boot, stamping on a human face, for all eternity." -1984 We haven't reached 1984 yet. We're still on the Brave New World (Liverpool option) track to get there.

Posted by: The Hobo Hooker, Waitress, Model, Actress, Wears Prada at January 17, 2014 09:10 AM (GeVLX)

265 Canadian muzzies complain about PM hosting Rabbi on trip to Israel.  PM uses full extent of his knowledge of diplomacy to tell them...

http://tinyurl.com/llcw6a6

Blow it out your ass! 

Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at January 17, 2014 09:10 AM (BZAd3)

266 253 ... If we're talking realism, Boehner most likely would just sound like Foster Brooks.

Posted by: ScoggDog at January 17, 2014 09:10 AM (cM7hk)

267 I made up a joke. Hillary Clinton crawls into a bar . . .

and the bartender says "Welcome, Mrs. Clinton.  I see you've found the carpet.  Hardwood in the next room if you prefer.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at January 17, 2014 09:10 AM (SY2Kh)

268 Check this out from the WSJ: http://tinyurl.com/oawhryt It's behind the subscription wall, but the review tells you all you need to know: The Endangered Species Act was signed in 1973 by a Republican president—Richard Nixon—and passed with the support of 99% of Congress. The goal was to protect America's special animals and plants no matter the cost, but the measure of the law's effectiveness depends on whether you're a glass half-full or half-empty person. Between 40%-50% of endangered species in the U.S. are improving or stable, but the others are moving toward extinction. While the law has driven the rebirth of 36 species, a similar number have disappeared. Got that? After all the billions that have been spent and businesses ruined, it's basically a wash. Who is to say this wouldn't have happened anyway without the law?

Posted by: rickl at January 17, 2014 09:11 AM (zoehZ)

269 When credit and wages pick up -> inflation -> bond market adjusts upwards -> Fed has to raise rates -> rinse amp; repeat. Which actually explains Amigo Grande! when you think on it...

Posted by: Yellowstone Caldera at January 17, 2014 09:11 AM (naUcP)

270 Let's see 10,000 local union members times an extra $2.85/hr times the contractual minimum wage factor times our union dues percentage.... fuck the math, there's plenty of money...  junket to the Bahamas for the executive team... fuck the Chicago winter

Posted by: Chicago Union Boss at January 17, 2014 09:11 AM (Pr6hk)

271 231
Congress would have to say one of two mutually exclusive things:
1 - Men and women are equal, therefore, women will be drafted.
2 - Men and women are not equal, therefore women will not be drafted.
What politician is going to say either of those things in public?
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at January 17, 2014 01:04 PM (fwARV)

Would women complain that they were not being drafted?
Do young women complain that their automobile insurance rates are lower than
the rates of young men?

Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr. at January 17, 2014 09:11 AM (m2Izr)

272 I wonder how bradley manning is doing. Since he only got sentenced in what-- August? he's probably still appealing his conviction. He's eligible for parole in 8 years but I think all his demand may block any early release based on good behavior.

Posted by: Dr. Schlomo Pugberg at January 17, 2014 09:11 AM (Qev5V)

273 Answering my own question ("how many federal workers make close to the minimum wage?"), the lowest pay rate I can find--Grade 1, Step 1--works out to $8.65 / hour.

The number of new federal employees hired each year is about 40,000 and the step system is seniority-based, so only those new hires could possibly be at the $8.65 number. The average new employee comes in at an average grade of 5, however, meaning that there cannot be more than about 10,000 federal employees making anywhere close to minimum wage--out of a total civilian federal workforce of about 2.7 million.

Posted by: Nicholas Kronos at January 17, 2014 09:12 AM (bUvM7)

274 263 AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at January 17, 2014 01:10 PM (PYAXX)

Well Allen for how many years have I wanted to save the Republic from this shit?

America didn't want saved, so quit trying to save her and get payback.

That will blow up the country if we pass it and it will destroy them dems not to pass it....

a lot like Amnesty....

I'm tired of the only safeguard Liberty has being the love and patriotism one side of the divide has.

Shoot the hostage so to speak.

Posted by: sven10077 at January 17, 2014 09:13 AM (TE35l)

275 I saw Executive Order open for Status Quo in '68. Decent show until a fight broke out between the Mods and the Rockers.

Posted by: Countrysquire at January 17, 2014 09:13 AM (LSJmV)

276 I've been hearing "interest rates are going to go up" for the past five years.
When is it going to happen?

Posted by: Bertram Cabot Jr
========
That is the question that ought to cause you to wake up covered in a cold sweat.

Unless you can imagine a scenario where it stays the same? (It can't go down as it is already at 0.)

Basically, you have to somehow imagine that there is some way the debt gets paid down and--AND--spending doesn't go up.

Posted by: RoyalOil at January 17, 2014 09:13 AM (VjL9S)

277

I guess part of this too is the thinking that the really big government vendors like Sodexho and Cintas and Waste Management will raise the minimum for all their workers voluntarily.  Or at least if any of those companies have unions it will give them more ammunition to demand a wage increase.  So it could have a ripple effect of raising the minimum wage for a lot of workers without new federal legislation. 

 

I could certainly see some quiet strong-arming of those comapnies by the Administration on this.  "Hey, nice government contract to have there....shame if anything happened to it."  Those who want to keep their contracts will suck it up and pay their non-government workers more too. 

 

Don't forget that radical thug Tom Perez is now Secretary of Labor and in charge of the division that enforces wage and hour laws. 

 

Some FOIAs might be in order once this EO is issued and in effect for a while. 

Posted by: rockmom at January 17, 2014 09:14 AM (aBlZ1)

278 As a couple of people have already pointed out, this cannot be applied to current contracts, many of which are multi-year.  Attempting to do so would trigger accross-the-board contract renegotiations due to the change in the cost basis.  That won't stop him from doing it though, since the point is the appearance of doing something.  As with most of the things he does, I doubt the President has the slightest clue how much make-work this will generate and how disruptive it will be to the already difficult process of ongoing Government contracting with an almost vanishingly small group of people benefitting.  All to be able to claim that he is doing something for the working poor that the Republicans won't do.

Posted by: Formerly known as Skeptic at January 17, 2014 09:16 AM (91XRk)

279 Posted by: rickl at January 17, 2014 01:11 PM (zoehZ) Basically they are trying to stop Evolution... Even though they say evolution is how we got here, and thus a good thing... Any law that tries to stop natural Forces is just plain stupid.... (helllloooo Mr. Global Warming Cap and Trade...)

Posted by: Romeo13 at January 17, 2014 09:19 AM (lZBBB)

280 278 Formerly known as Skeptic at January 17, 2014 01:16 PM (91XRk)

Exactly, it will blow up the omnibus...BUT if we use my student loan forgiveness plan we can do A HUGE gesture

Posted by: sven10077 at January 17, 2014 09:20 AM (TE35l)

281 Republicans should also propose a "temporary" suspension of the collection of Social Security and Medicaid taxes--timed to expire October 25th--instead of raising the minimum wage.

Say that it is a breather that costs employers nothing while allowing the economy to catch it's breath.

Dare the fucking Dems to refuse a year extension right before elections.

Posted by: RoyalOil at January 17, 2014 09:24 AM (VjL9S)

282 281 RoyalOil at January 17, 2014 01:24 PM (VjL9S)

There you go...

another good idea which means we won't do it b/c "responsibility"...

if MomJeans got reelected it means the voters don't want responsible they want free

Posted by: sven10077 at January 17, 2014 09:26 AM (TE35l)

283 We need to start talking about RINO primary opponents, like Eric Gurr who is going after Bohenor. They're not going to get the money Bohenor can pull in from his establishment sources. So we need to get the word out on them.

Posted by: Iblis at January 17, 2014 10:10 AM (NVFTu)

284 Kathyrn Bigelow is rumored to have been in talks to direct "Year of Action".

Posted by: Chairman LMAO at January 17, 2014 10:15 AM (9eDbm)

285 Prolly nonjusticiable as a political question. Roberts and all.

Posted by: random thought generator at January 17, 2014 11:01 AM (indzz)

286 Has anyone mentioned the unpaid interns or the female White House employees who make less than the men yet? And now to maybe read some comments, whatever.

Posted by: Sam Hill at January 17, 2014 11:02 AM (zgHLA)

287 Empty gesture: Minimum wage is $7.25 per hour, while minimum Federal wage is $8.25 per hour. Empty gesture; empty suit. We are not impressed.

Posted by: I lurk, therefore I amn't at January 17, 2014 11:06 AM (fJqq3)

288 Two words: Davis Bacon.

All federal contractors agree to pay wages established annually under the Davis Bacon act. I seriously doubt that there are unskilled workers in large numbers employed by federal contractors. The overhead of dealing with federal contracting doesn't make it worth the effort of offering low wage, low skilled workers on a federal contract.

Additionally, in both construction and service contracts, the offeror discloses the rates that pay to all employee categories that are expected to be used in the contract. These Contract Line Items, called "CLINS," are negotiated between the contracting officer and the contracting firm.

There ain't no such animal as a minimum wage employee on a federal contract. I know this, because I've been working for, with and against the United States Government--as a contracting technical rep and as a contractor--for more that 25 years.

This is nothing more than grandstanding.

Posted by: IBleedCrimsonRed at January 17, 2014 11:27 AM (UxlLb)

289 Finallly!!  I have to scroll down to comment 288 before someone mentions the Davis Bacon Act.  Obama's executive order is pure B.S.  You are dead on correct IBleedCrimsonRed.

Posted by: Barry at January 17, 2014 12:53 PM (IDH+x)

290 The excess wages will, of course, be paid for by taxpayers, and absent an act of Congress raising the federal contractor minimum wage, this seems probably illegal. When has legality ever stopped Emperor TehWon?

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at January 17, 2014 02:35 PM (1hM1d)

291 288 Two words: Davis Bacon. Cool. I'll throw that at the proggies when they start fellating Emperor TehWon on his audacious plan.

Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at January 17, 2014 02:37 PM (1hM1d)

292 There are no federal employees making minimum wage.

BHO can take that pen and shove it up his phone.

Posted by: Great Reagan's Ghost at January 18, 2014 08:15 PM (LsJAk)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
224kb generated in CPU 0.0748, elapsed 0.2854 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2255 seconds, 420 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.