January 05, 2014
— Open Blogger

This Painting Is Full of Homoerotic Imagery. Can't You See It?
Good morning morons and moronettes and welcome to the award-winning AoSHQ's prestigious Sunday Morning Book Thread.
Everyone is Gay, Especially Famous Dead Guys
OK, so there's been some brouhaha going on this week over Norman Rockwell, American Mirror: The Life and Art of Norman Rockwell, a newly published biography of the American artist by Deborah Solomon. She manages to find homosexuality, pedophilia, or some other repressed sexual subtext underneath everything Rockwell ever thought, wrote or drew in his entire life. It's like finding animals in clouds or patterns in Rorschach ink blots that say more about the psychology of the observer than snything else.
For example:
Her take on Freedom of Speech is that the man standing is ‘unattached and sexually available. Unbuttoned and unzipped.’
Yeah, right. Solomon probably just should have titled her book, 'The Queering of Norman Rockwell', and be done with it, but that would have narrowed its appeal down to only a handful of moonbat academics and killed any sales potential. It's so bad that the family of Norman Rockwell has issued a statement denouncing Solomon's book as the work of an ignorant hack:
She has neglected or misused the sources which she cites. Her use of Norman Rockwell's autobiography, My Adventures As An Illustrator, is highly selective. As Professor Patrick Toner of Wake Forest University states in his online review on First Things.com, ‘Solomon has a pronounced tendency to either distort or simply ignore evidence to the contrary’...sex is a major theme of the book and her phantom theories color and distort everything, including Rockwell’s entire character and her interpretations of his art.
It was too much even for Garrison Keillor, whom you might think would be sympathetic to this sort of thing. Apparently, not this time. In a mostly positive NY Times review, he observes:

And This Guy? Totally Gay
[Solomon] does seem awfully eager to find homoeroticism — poor Rockwell cannot go on a fishing trip with other men without his biographer finding sexual overtones...In “Girl at Mirror,” a young girl in a white slip studies her own reflection — “Actually,” says Solomon, “seen from the back, she could be a boy.” And the girlÂ’s doll, tossed on the floor? “A bizarrely sexualized object.” ÂReally? “With her right hand buried in her petticoats, the doll could almost be masturbating.” Well, I suppose that MichelangeloÂ’s “David” could “almost” be masturbating. So have we all sometimes almost.
Note to Solomon: when even the reliably progressive Garrison Keillor can't wrap his head around your thesis, maybe you should get a new one.
Finally, an Amazon reviewer notes that if art is an expression of the artist's repressed sexuality, then Andy Warhol was clearly a closeted heterosexual. After all, look at all of his paintings of Marilyn and Jackie. The man was clearly obsessed with female bodies.
Books I Should Read, But Haven't
Here's a biography that's actually worthwhile: The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, by Benjamin Franklin. It's one of those books that's just sitting there on my shelf, and I keep saying I need to read it, but somehow I never can get around to it.
The Christian Science Monitor calls it one of the first self-help books:
For many, it is the life story of Franklin – who started as an apprentice to his older brother, a printer, and rose to be one of the most famous statesmen and writers in the world – that is inspirational. Franklin is not shy about praising himself (some readers have noted with amusement the number of times that Franklin praises his own humility) but for others his discussion of the virtues likely to lead to success in life comes across as instructive rather than braggadocious. Many readers over the years have also expressed appreciation for the degree to which Franklin comes face to face with his own errors as he tells his story...However, many are also attracted to the degree to which Franklin seems practically engaged with the business of self-improvement. The book includes a section in which Franklin makes a list of 13 virtues he wants to emulate and draws a box for each for each day, putting a black mark in a box if he did not succeed.
Franklin truly was a remarkable man. There are many great men who were not good men, but I think Franklin was a little bit of both.
Copyright News
The entire Sherlock Holmes canon has been in the public domain in Britain since the end of 2000. However, here in the United States, it's not that simple:
On Monday, December 23, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ruled on the plaintiffÂ’s motion for summary judgment against the Conan Doyle Estate in a case involving the literary figures of Sherlock Holmes and Doctor Watson. The CourtÂ’s ruling states, in brief, that creators are free to use the characters of Holmes and Watson without licensing them from the Conan Doyle Estate. The Court cautioned that new stories about the pair canÂ’t use elements that appear exclusively in the ten post-1922 stories by Conan Doyle (those that remain in copyright). However, elements from the fifty pre-1923 stories are in the public domain.
So if you attempt to make use of Holmes material published after 2013, you could be hit with a lawsuit from the Doyle estate. Except if you're in Great Britain, in which case you can tell them to bugger off.
So, you may not freely describe "Dr. Watson's own athletic background, the juicy fact of his second marriage or the circumstances of Holmes's retirement", as those derive from Arthur Conan Doyles's post-1923 Holmes stories.
You got that?
OK, I guess that makes sense, if you're a lawyer. It's seems a little weird to me, though. I think that either the character is either in the public domain, or he isn't, but what do I know? Fortunately, this all becomes moot in 2022 when all of the Holmes stories will be in the public domain.
Perhaps the Doyle estate should hire the same lawyers that the Walt Disney company uses. They've successfully litigated to keep Mickey Mouse under copyright for, like, ever. In fact, I think it's still an open legal question as to when exactly the Mickey Mouse copyright actually does expire, and nobody wants to take on the Disney corporation in court to find out.
Books By Morons
The Thank You Angel, an illustrated children's book, is by longtime AoSHQ reader Ann Trenton, who e-mailed me earlier this week. It's her first Kindle book, and it's about a little girl who learns about the joy of saying "Thank You" from her grandmother and the Thank You Angel.
___________
So that's all for this week. As always, book thread tips, suggestions, rumors, threats, and insults may be sent to OregonMuse, Proprietor, AoSHQ Book Thread, at aoshqbookthread, followed by the 'at' sign, and then 'G' mail, and then dot cee oh emm.
What have you all been reading this week? Hopefully something good, because, as I keep saying, life is too short to be reading lousy books.
Posted by: Open Blogger at
07:04 AM
| Comments (276)
Post contains 1204 words, total size 9 kb.
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) No Really! at January 05, 2014 07:13 AM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Empire1 at January 05, 2014 07:17 AM (U9hUF)
Posted by: Ribald Conservative riding Orca at January 05, 2014 07:18 AM (dCwZe)
Posted by: rickl at January 05, 2014 07:21 AM (sdi6R)
It is an upskirt... But she has her knees too close together. Just not enough sunshine on the subject.
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at January 05, 2014 07:23 AM (IN7k+)
Correct and a good point. Uncle Milty was what made me a non-pirate but a believer in "abandonedware." The copyright owner should at a minimum be required to execute and show use of the copyright to a certain density in some set period to exert CR IMHO.
No offense to the Doyle Estate but Holmes is not theirs anymore than whichever lumberjack first spinned a yarn about Paul Bunyan owns the Brawny Lumberjack image for maluse.
It is surreal that England is more free market than we are on this and is in fact on the verge of perhaps following Canada in welfare state reform.
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 07:24 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: --- at January 05, 2014 07:25 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: PabloD at January 05, 2014 07:26 AM (aZzjF)
Posted by: Todd Rundgren at January 05, 2014 07:26 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: eman at January 05, 2014 07:26 AM (EWsrI)
Posted by: Ribald Conservative riding Orca at January 05, 2014 07:27 AM (dCwZe)
Posted by: All Hail Eris at January 05, 2014 07:27 AM (QBm1P)
Tell me about it...
//Jesus watching Defoe in Last Temptation of Christ
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 07:27 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: Billinois at January 05, 2014 07:29 AM (BttDX)
Posted by: elaine at January 05, 2014 07:31 AM (GNZ0/)
Posted by: Hugh Jass at January 05, 2014 07:31 AM (6S4Ai)
Posted by: Billinois at January 05, 2014 07:32 AM (BttDX)
Posted by: Mindy at January 05, 2014 07:33 AM (Bs5ky)
Posted by: --- at January 05, 2014 11:25 AM (MMC8r)
Once upon a time people kept their personal insanities out of the public eye, and I think it is about time for a revival of that behavior.
Posted by: Mikey NTH -Have a Querulous New Year from the Outrage Outlet at January 05, 2014 07:33 AM (gmoEG)
Posted by: Brave Sir Robin at January 05, 2014 07:33 AM (XLoA6)
Posted by: --- at January 05, 2014 07:34 AM (MMC8r)
Calculus of a single variable reads pretty much the same today as it did 25 years ago, and no gay to be found in any chapter.
Although Descartes was French and you know how libertine the French can be.....
Posted by: Kreplach at January 05, 2014 07:35 AM (Xkr8I)
Would it be a stretch to surmise that this Solomon gal hates the Dong?
Also, I would be in favor of returning to 30 years for copyrights.
Posted by: Darth Randall at January 05, 2014 07:35 AM (Zswg6)
Regarding copyright, was it here that someone linked to the free sci fi story online about copyright?
(I wrote a paragraph describing it and then found it online anyway after a flash of inspiration about the title... here it is: http://www.baen.com/chapters/W200011/0671319744___1.htm and will link it in my name too, hope it works).
Posted by: GalaKitty at January 05, 2014 07:36 AM (KT2XH)
Posted by: Northernlurker at January 05, 2014 07:36 AM (BLAfs)
Ve concur, vunce upon a time ve vould haf keppt Sven in der attic...
//Olaf Nilsson Vater uf Sven
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 07:36 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: ka at January 05, 2014 07:37 AM (GDUJK)
Posted by: TexasJew at January 05, 2014 07:38 AM (U+u4A)
Posted by: --- at January 05, 2014 07:38 AM (MMC8r)
That would be correct, I think the allegation in the piece on Rockwell when coupled with PIV Avenger means that at some point the XY conspiracy destroyed the artificial womb and insemination machines that have existed on Earth for all time.
With all these historical figures that were gay I am amazed the human race managed to sustain itself prior to the rise of these "clear thinkers."
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 07:38 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: elaine at January 05, 2014 07:39 AM (GNZ0/)
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 05, 2014 07:39 AM (fd0Pp)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at January 05, 2014 07:39 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at January 05, 2014 07:39 AM (EZNxq)
Posted by: rickl at January 05, 2014 07:40 AM (sdi6R)
If you think my therapy bills are high you should look at Tom Turkey's...
//The Chicken
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 07:40 AM (TE35l)
I haven't listened to Keillor since the 80's. Since his review of the Queering of Norman Rockwell is "mainly positive," I take it Lake Woebegon is now a place where all the men are ghey, all the women are ghey and all the children are ghey above average and they all shop at Ralph's Pretty Good Homo Grocery?
Well, they are all Scandis, after all. What can you expect from Vikings fans.
Posted by: Donna V. at January 05, 2014 07:40 AM (R3gO3)
Posted by: Trimegistus at January 05, 2014 07:41 AM (BqW72)
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 05, 2014 07:41 AM (fd0Pp)
Reading that book, "Into the Wild" and Shackleford's expeditionary notes would be illustrative.
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 07:41 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at January 05, 2014 07:42 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at January 05, 2014 07:42 AM (EZNxq)
Although Descartes was French and you know how libertine the French can be..... Posted by: Kreplach at January 05, 2014 11:35 AM (Xkr8I)
Rene Decartes was a drunken fart,
"I drink therefore I am!"
Posted by: Donna V. at January 05, 2014 07:42 AM (R3gO3)
Posted by: Brave Sir Robin at January 05, 2014 07:42 AM (XLoA6)
Posted by: Mindy at January 05, 2014 07:43 AM (Bs5ky)
Posted by: BlackOrchid at January 05, 2014 07:44 AM (EZNxq)
Posted by: elaine at January 05, 2014 07:44 AM (GNZ0/)
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 05, 2014 07:44 AM (fd0Pp)
Posted by: Dan at January 05, 2014 07:44 AM (R8QvG)
Posted by: elaine at January 05, 2014 07:46 AM (GNZ0/)
I don't have the link handy, but there is some psychopath woman who has taken the "all sex is rape" mania in a new and exciting direction.
Her allegation is that in addition to innately being rape because of the inferior bargaining position of the female of the species as Hyper-Feminists claim that all humans are in fact homosexual and there is a conspiracy of Heterodynamic Patriarchy in subverting our natural homosexuality as a species.
More distressing than her idiocy, which can safely be dismissed as the rantings of an unquiet mind is the fact that she has vocal backers in the comments section of said piece.
The victims studies hivemind assholes are probably going to destroy this nation.
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 07:46 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: --- at January 05, 2014 07:46 AM (MMC8r)
Still reading Washington's Secret Six and find it interesting and fairly well written. Scary times those with the British monitoring the comings and goings and writings of the populace. Hmm wonder why that seems so familiar?
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 05, 2014 07:47 AM (o3MSL)
Oops too late, heh looks like the commentariat got ahead of the Cobs on some inside baseball cant o'er the yule I guess.
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 07:47 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: M. Murcek at January 05, 2014 07:47 AM (GJUgF)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] The Barrel at January 05, 2014 07:48 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 05, 2014 07:48 AM (fd0Pp)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at January 05, 2014 07:48 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: TexasJew at January 05, 2014 07:48 AM (U+u4A)
Posted by: eman at January 05, 2014 07:48 AM (EWsrI)
Posted by: rickl at January 05, 2014 07:49 AM (sdi6R)
Yeah...wash your hands and eyes before going.
I am DESPERATELY having to fight the temptation to go engage her.
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 07:51 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at January 05, 2014 07:52 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: TexasJew at January 05, 2014 07:54 AM (U+u4A)
Posted by: Intersex gender queer human at January 05, 2014 07:54 AM (/cUUk)
Posted by: Tonestaple at January 05, 2014 07:54 AM (B7YN4)
well my parents both are ramped up in their carnal motors or rather were in the case of mom....
the thing is we used to grasp you did not want your public persona to be the pursuit of "parts" or something....
Somehwhere along the way we jettisoned the intimacy of the activity I think as a culture and are on the cusp of making "the American view" of sex not homosexuality on a grand scale but "all sex is masturbation" to whatever degree.
Anyway this movement is beyond my comprehension.
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 07:55 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at January 05, 2014 07:55 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Brave Sir Robin at January 05, 2014 07:55 AM (XLoA6)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at January 05, 2014 07:57 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: All Hail Eris at January 05, 2014 11:27 AM (QBm1P)"
David P. Goldman likens Petraeus to to Gen Wallenstein of The Thirty Years War.
Posted by: Grampa Jimbo at January 05, 2014 07:58 AM (V70Uh)
Posted by: David at January 05, 2014 07:58 AM (6Oj/Y)
That's certainly not an invalid way of analyzing Shackleton, the reason I chose him and not the Scandi was he made it even if by the skin of his teeth.
In a saner world and definitely the world the AGW cult professes wanting(a greened world without the ability to mount these rescues) Chris McCandless didn't and the Aussie on the SS Chilly Willy would not.
One has to have respect for the world you face, not pretend the world is a disney cartoon.
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 07:58 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 05, 2014 07:59 AM (fd0Pp)
Posted by: Mikey NTH -Have a Querulous New Year from the Outrage Outlet at January 05, 2014 08:00 AM (gmoEG)
Posted by: tomc at January 05, 2014 08:01 AM (avEuh)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami at January 05, 2014 08:01 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: Captain's daughter at January 05, 2014 08:01 AM (xBYS9)
They only have sex with the opposite sex occasionally due to boredom and to remind themselves of how icky it is.
Oh and JESUS? Totally gay.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Unexpurgated Edition) at January 05, 2014 08:02 AM (LSDdO)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at January 05, 2014 08:03 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at January 05, 2014 08:03 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Ribald Conservative riding Orca at January 05, 2014 08:04 AM (dCwZe)
Posted by: TexasJew at January 05, 2014 08:04 AM (U+u4A)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami at January 05, 2014 08:05 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at January 05, 2014 08:05 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Uniden at January 05, 2014 08:05 AM (13G+x)
Posted by: geeves at January 05, 2014 08:05 AM (MFuKa)
Quite my wife laughed her ass off that this weak liberal bint thinks she, a US Army Senior NCO is being cowed or bamboozled into liking the dirty hula.
On topic and of a more worthy nature to ponder is the surprise I had at the quality of Harry Turtledove's Give Me Back My Legions! an offering by Dr. Turtledove that is of the historical fiction rather than alternate history genre.
http://tinyurl.com/q5qsvgg
I had had it laying around and decided to consume it as the hotel reading material on my lap around the east. It is not long, and the dialog is a bit repetitive but the POV of the Roman Governor and the main Tribal leader on their way to Teutoburg Forest was well done.
http://tinyurl.com/5r9r48
About the only criticism I can levy is I wish Dr. Turtledove had gone into more detail on the Roman logistical net, and the difference in the understanding of militaria between the Legion, the Auxillas, and the Barbarian Horde.
If anyone uses the review to pursue it, I hope it is to your liking and my analysis was correct and helpful.
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 08:06 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: Lizzy at January 05, 2014 08:06 AM (POpqt)
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 05, 2014 08:07 AM (fd0Pp)
Posted by: BornLib at January 05, 2014 08:07 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b] at January 05, 2014 08:08 AM (0HooB)
One of the problems faced by academics is a very basic one: thousands of academics before them have already picked over Shakespeare, Dickens, da Vinci, Beethoven - the entire canon of Western Civilization -and analyzed their work - every word, every line, every note. And most academics are not bright enough to add anything that's truly original and profound.
So the schub sitting there trying to come up with a grad school thesis who hopes to make a name for him/herself as an authority on something has 2 options now - you can declare that all those dead white men are no good anyway and focus on some obscure or not so obscure minority or pop star or fashionable feminst and declare that Toni Morrison or JayZ are far worthier of study than Shakespeare. Or else you can take one of those dead white males and make him "transgressive" Making them queer is a goldmine because once you start seeing teh ghey everywhere, it means that even someone like Dickens, who fathered a zillion kids, can be forced into your theory. Hey, did you know Fagan and the Artful Dodger and Oliver Twist were really lovers? Madame LaFarge was a man in drag! Little Nell was a lesbian!
And best of all, Dickens (and Rockwell, and whatever dead white male you're dragging through the mud) can't defend themselves, so you can say any old crap you want and other "intellectuals" will take you seriously.
Posted by: Donna V. at January 05, 2014 08:08 AM (R3gO3)
Posted by: rickl at January 05, 2014 08:08 AM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 11:58 AM (TE35l)
That'll be a $1.50 for mentioning "disney" and "cartoon" in the same sentence in the same century.
Posted by: Huey, Dewey and Louie - Disney Law at January 05, 2014 08:08 AM (LSDdO)
"Therefore, it must be borne in mind that grave imbalances are produced when economic action, conceived merely as an engine for wealth creation, is detached from political action, conceived as a mean for pursuing justice through redistribution."
Posted by: Grampa Jimbo at January 05, 2014 08:09 AM (V70Uh)
Posted by: Tonestaple at January 05, 2014 08:09 AM (B7YN4)
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at January 05, 2014 08:09 AM (celt+)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at January 05, 2014 08:09 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Mikey NTH -Have a Querulous New Year from the Outrage Outlet at January 05, 2014 08:10 AM (gmoEG)
Also read a bit in "Glittering Images" where Camille Paglia writes about works of art through history up to the current time. With all the dreck passing as "art", Camille is extremely good at writing about the background of historical works in a way easy for the reader to appreciate. Too bad more libs aren't as erudite as she is, despite their inflated opinion of themselves.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 05, 2014 08:12 AM (N0FA7)
Ah Zombie Walt sent the legbreakers...
thank God you guys don't give a damn about protecting Miley Cyrus' CR anymore...
"here you go"
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 08:13 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: Icedog at January 05, 2014 08:15 AM (uZ6Ul)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 05, 2014 08:15 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at January 05, 2014 08:16 AM (XIxXP)
For survival stories, I read "66 Days Adrift" years ago. A man and his wife in a leaky raft on the open sea. Pretty harrowing.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at January 05, 2014 08:17 AM (MaP11)
"I'm six figures in debt from my worthless degree and I have to justify it somehow."
Posted by: NR Pax at January 05, 2014 08:17 AM (ODsL5)
Posted by: Trimegistus at January 05, 2014 08:18 AM (BqW72)
Yep. All ebooks.
Is it just me or is this being carried too far? Are we wise in putting everything into ephemeral digital bits that can disappear forever just because the power goes out?
It this way more ancient civilizations don't show on the archeological time line because they LEFT NO EVIDENCE of their existence?
I know I'm borderline curmudgeon and stuff but I really don't like the trend of cars that can only work via computer and books that can only be read on a proprietary piece of gear that uses batteries like a meth head uses ephedrine.
There's other examples of this sort of thing and it bothers me.
Maybe because I understand on a gut level how ephemeral anything electrically driven can be. When the electrons stop moving, everything comes to a halt. No juice no use. You go back instantly to 1890 or so.
It's why the possibility of an EMP should be scaring the kcuf out of people in DC.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Unexpurgated Edition) at January 05, 2014 08:18 AM (LSDdO)
Posted by: NaCly Dog at January 05, 2014 08:18 AM (u82oZ)
http://tinyurl.com/qcgyazy
He was probably "gay"; Norm, probably not. But you know, if Leyendecker and Rockwell represent the "gay aesthetic," my argument is going to be, OK, "gays," how come you can't do what they did? Because the pitiful little flakes cannot, flail as they may.
The "self-help" reading of Franklin's autobiography was drummed by D.H. Lawrence, obviously a moral giant, to mock him.
http://www2.sunysuffolk.edu/lewiss/lawrence.htm
But if you read the whole little book, Franklin beats him to the punch by two centuries, by making fun of himself first. It was a phase he went through, like sun worship. He's pretty frank (heh) and graphic about his other phases, like being just lucky to avoid VD, and the grey cats in the dark business. The booklet is full of social drollery, such as commentary on Indian rum-n-fire treaty parties and the Quakers sending a secret emissary to buy lottery tickets from Ben's armaments committee.
Also, great and knowingly hypocritical business advice, such as pushing your own wheelbarrow to pick up printer's supplies, and making sure you do it at an hour when everbody on Walnut Street will see you do it. If you can read between the lines enough to get the jokes in Poor Richard, you'll see this as a work of comic genius easily in a class with Twain, O'Rourke and Dave Barry. Not to mention, the advice all works.
Franklin wasn't always old and fat. He and a buddy (gay context warning) toured Europe as professional exhibition divers in their youth, making Ben the first professional athlete to ever serve in Congress, hmm. And he wasn't just a printer: he retired early to do experiments because he franchised a chain of print shops, with indenture contracts to help with the turnover problem. Damned sharp businessman. You can't fit him into any boxes we can imagine.
Posted by: Stringer Davis at January 05, 2014 08:20 AM (xq1UY)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at January 05, 2014 08:20 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Socratease at January 05, 2014 08:21 AM (1jViy)
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 05, 2014 08:22 AM (fd0Pp)
Posted by: eman at January 05, 2014 08:22 AM (EWsrI)
It's the end result of their "no enemies to my left" mindset. They are in bed with psychotics like PIV lady and "Rockwell was t3g Ghey" who will attempt to excoriate the wayward lib in a hive of flea bites. The intellectual ego of the nuts is 15 tons alanced on a millimeter of worth any shift in the lunatic left's balance means the thing collapses.
If Paglia admitted liking any of Limbaugh's work hell even simply his pomp and delivery as a master radio voice she would suffer the fleabites.
It is not enough that we are wrong in the application of data, that we may in fact be drawing incorrect conclusions from a sound mind to the liberal POV they have to attempt to dehumanize and discredit us as being unable to think and of no worth as craftsmen lest they have to reflect on who they are in bed with and what they are empowering.
You know what it reminds me of?
Jake Spoon from the literary Lonesome Dove by Larry McMurtry whereby Spoon a man who is similar but not the same as Gus and Call slowly but unerringly becomes a Brigand by just trying to get to the other side of the Comanchero spread and never reflecting hard enough on his trailmates actions.
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 08:22 AM (TE35l)
It appears I am stuck in the 15th century and cannot bring myself to leave it except to go further back in time.
Posted by: huerfano at January 05, 2014 08:23 AM (bAGA/)
Camille was one of Rush's biggest defenders when the JEF started calling him out, correctly identifying it as the state coming down hard on an entertainer. Unfortunately she was still in the "Gaylord Focker just has bad people around him" mode, which wasn't without an element of truth but it missed most of the story.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 05, 2014 08:24 AM (N0FA7)
Posted by: Notsothoreau at January 05, 2014 08:25 AM (Lqy/e)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at January 05, 2014 08:25 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Count de Monet at January 05, 2014 08:25 AM (BAS5M)
The culmination of a trend which originally began in Hollyweird.
Starting in the 1990s, the pink mafia began to shove homosexual content and storylines into film and television story arcs, even when that didn't make much sense. It was "narrative shaping", for political ends, consistency of storyline be damned. Everything had to have its Recommended Daily Allowance of queer.
But that has gone so far now that everything newly produced in the entertainment sphere is completely saturated and dripping with mandatory gayness.
So the next step was to go back and start to retroactively crowbar in homosexuality everywhere in literary, dramatic, film and TV history. Even where that plainly clashes with original creators' intent.
And now that the entire world of fiction has been crudely retconned into pink political correctness, all of nonfiction history must similarly go under the knife.
Just a tiresome and shopworn gambit at this point. Yet showing no signs of yielding to reality. That dead horse will surely get up if it's beaten a bit more.
Again, as always: I don't care who sleeps with whom, as long as all involved are competent consenting adults, as long as all downside risks are accepted and honestly borne, and as long as kids are insulated from both the acts and the consequences thereof.
Posted by: torquewrench at January 05, 2014 08:26 AM (gqT4g)
I notice that this meme works best when the newly-discovered gay celebrity is DEAD-- you know, when those silly, old-fashioned LIBEL LAWSUITS are no longer a concern for the publisher. ("Libel" is a "personal action" that dies with the person.)
re: book recommendation
"The Sleepwalkers" by Christopher Clark, about the historical background that made WW I possible. I mentioned it last week at the end of the thread. The book explores HOW, not WHY. And it starts with the aftermath of the Franco-Prussian War in 1871-- and NOT with the damn diplomatic crisis of 1914. (Picking up the story with the '14 crisis is like starting Super Bowl coverage at the 2-minute warning.)
There. Did I catch & replace all the ampersands?
Posted by: mnw at January 05, 2014 08:26 AM (68RU9)
Posted by: Trimegistus at January 05, 2014 08:26 AM (BqW72)
No you don't instantly go back to the 1890s you pray you climb out of the 1500s back to the 1890s QUICK.
I have reviewed it before in the book threads of your but I will reiterate if you are NOT reading One Second After on the matter of sudden resets you're doing it wrong.
http://tinyurl.com/m7leaxq
Yes the efficacy of the EMP in totally blanking all extant tech is likely overstated by a margin but the breakdown of the logistical grid and our 72 hour nation is not.
Happy reading.
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 08:27 AM (TE35l)
The hubris of this time amazes me. To hear these fools talk this is the first time in the world's history that people had sex, thought about sex, talk about sex, write about sex, and generally know anything about it according to them. They also think other people give a crap what they think or are doing with sex. Their self absorbtion and narcissism is boundless. The world and human thought began with them. And they are as dumb as rocks and twice as ignorant.
Posted by: Lester at January 05, 2014 08:27 AM (2UPXV)
I'm reading "Cyberattack" right now and this is exactly what happens - China starts systematically targeting various electronic systems, starting with things like the USPS and trains, so people just assume "glitches" until it's too late.
Posted by: Lizzy at January 05, 2014 08:27 AM (POpqt)
Posted by: Lincolntf at January 05, 2014 08:27 AM (ZshNr)
----------------------
She does, and she has. Luckily, she doesn't care.
Posted by: Taro Tsujimoto at January 05, 2014 08:28 AM (celt+)
Posted by: rickl at January 05, 2014 08:29 AM (sdi6R)
Ms Paglia is as has been noted an odd(and beautiful in her day) duck...
Chris Matthews is a Limbaugh fan, he admitted it until after 9/11.
Think he'd hype it now?
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 08:29 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 12:22 PM (TE35l)
She openly admits finding him entertaining. She doesn't care what the libs say about her.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 05, 2014 08:29 AM (N0FA7)
Posted by: rickl at January 05, 2014 08:29 AM (sdi6R)
I remain amazed that the autobiography of Benjamin Franklin is not required reading in American schools. Old Ben lived the American Dream; rising from humble origins, he used education and hard work to become successful, gain a good public reputation, and ascend to the corridors of influence, only to have the doors to smoke-filled rooms slammed in his face by those who didn't want ignorant rubes from the sticks running the country. His revenge was then to help found a nation where people like himself would be commonplace.
Posted by: exdem13 at January 05, 2014 08:29 AM (lJaja)
Paglia is a mix of sense and nonsense. The annoying thing is that she sees the problems with the Left very clearly and knows how f'ed up they are, but she remains on the Left because she's stuck on being a card-carrying member of the radical '60's generation (whenever Paglia starts a sentence with "My generation of the '60's.." I always roll my eyes, because it is inevitably followed by self-flattering bs about how they broke on through to the other side, yeah). She can't seem to see it's her fellow '60's radicals who ruined higher education and politics in this country. (She says the ones who went into academia weren't really radicals.)
Because she has that disconnect, she's stupid about politics. She loved the Clintons when they first appeared on the scene - and then realized Hill and Bill are power-mad scum and became disillusioned. She did the same thing with Obama. She fell for all his bs and then realized he's a phoney. She hates Ocare - but voted for some obscure socialist in 2012.
She has more respect for conservatives than most academics do - but that doesn't translate in admitting that ordinary people saw through the Clintons and Obama long before she did.
Posted by: Donna V. at January 05, 2014 08:30 AM (R3gO3)
Correct which is why I used the analogy admittedly inelegantly.
The reality is these "good liberals" are not really vulnerable to rebuke by their lunatic fringe IMHO.
I wonder if they are silent as we are calumnied because they enjoy the power of a whipped up leftist mob or they have fooled themselves into thinking their fringe is really that powerful?
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 08:31 AM (TE35l)
Milan Kundera's "The Book of Laughter and Forgetting" covers this well. Read it about 25 years ago and it may be time for me to revisit it. Kundera sure saw the evils of communism.
Posted by: Lizzy at January 05, 2014 08:31 AM (POpqt)
I was reading over the canon for the nth time. There's a lot of food and drink (and smokes) in there. Holmes does not discuss cases over meals, and there are no recipes, but there are many suggestive passages in re food and music. E.g., in Sign of Four, Athelney Jones is offered eels and whisky-and-soda.
So today's menu is inspired by Holmes, Victorian cuisine and my own limitations: roast beef, roasted potatoes, onion pie, marinated cucumbers, green pea salad, oranges with fennel and pomegranate. Dessert is almond junket (in honor of the British Empire, but Chinese because I dislike Indian dessert) and bread pudding. Before dinner, mulled wine. After dinner we'll have the toast to the woman with tokay.
If I can get Mr SinMi on board as "range officer" out our back door, we'll have a few 'V R's shot onto paper targets, or pictures of the Mahdi, for decor.
I wish Holmes lovers among you would come. Next year?
From just outside the People's Republikkk of Ann Arbor.
Posted by: sinmi at January 05, 2014 08:32 AM (+UD5P)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at January 05, 2014 08:32 AM (XIxXP)
Posted by: Andres Serrano at January 05, 2014 08:33 AM (XGNb9)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at January 05, 2014 08:33 AM (g4TxM)
Think he'd hype it now?
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 12:29 PM (TE35l)
Matthews used to be entertaining up until he made the Faustian bargain of supporting Slick against his Monica situation. He's been a complete fucking idiot since then. I suspect he needs a twelve step program.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 05, 2014 08:33 AM (N0FA7)
Yeah I acknowledged later I was inelegant in my delivery by typed thought.
Paglia is an odd duck, and the flea bites are the likes of Jharles Chonson.
In honesty Paglia handles it correctly who the hell should give a damn what Jharles says?
Look at how often we on the right continue to consume leftist entertainment and produced items.
We engage in good American civics the left...not so much. I am a voice that says in response we should probably meet the Center-Left of the nation in the middle and start using our cash and commerce as a weapon but I am not thrilled about it. Doing so means a cession of a cornerstone of what brought us into a genuine Republic.
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 08:34 AM (TE35l)
Posted by: mnw at January 05, 2014 08:35 AM (68RU9)
It's called "Dead Mountain", by Donnie Eichar. It's the story of a Russian group of nine hikers, who in 1959, go out on a hike and don't return. They are University students who are in a hiking club, which apparently was all the rage at the time. All well seasoned, experienced. A massive air-land search is set out for them. 10 days after they were supposed to have returned, searchers find their tent. All their belongings are neatly inside, including, incredibly, their boots and most of their jackets! As the days pass, the bodies are found one by one. Most had frozen to death, some of them with broken bones. Later evidence shows that cuts at the back of the tent they were in were made from the inside.
So all anyone could say was that they had fled their tent, and died outside. But why? No known large animals in the area, no signs of people anywhere near (closest village about 50 miles away). Stories circulated for years about weird lights in the sky around that time, evidence of radiation on some of the bodies, and just plain odd demands from some of the local Communist governing bodies.
What makes the book really interesting is that the final hike was well documented. Since these students wanted to move up from a level 2 club to a level 3, they had to document the tough hike they were undertaking. So most of them had cameras, and many had diaries or journals.
Other great thing is the author, who travels to Russia several times, and even re-traces the hikers route during the same time of year. Oh, and he meets with the one hiker who had turned back before the final journey.
So it's a real page turner, jumping between 1959 and 2012. I very much recommend it, plus, like I said, it has lots of pictures.
Posted by: HH at January 05, 2014 08:35 AM (XXwdv)
Posted by: BornLib at January 05, 2014 08:36 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Chromoly Man at January 05, 2014 08:36 AM (dRz+o)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at January 05, 2014 08:37 AM (XIxXP)
I put Paglia in the "brilliant mind lacking common sense" category. Excellent insights and then the opposite conclusions to those insights.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at January 05, 2014 08:37 AM (MaP11)
Nice summation. She is definitely cyclical on her thought on the Democrats. She refuses to face her service to evil intentioned authored ideology.
I look at her and Horowitz and have always valued Horowitz because he acknowledges, "these are evil people."
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 08:38 AM (TE35l)
"So today's menu is inspired by Holmes, Victorian cuisine and my own limitations: roast beef, roasted potatoes, onion pie, marinated cucumbers, green pea salad, oranges with fennel and pomegranate. Dessert is almond junket (in honor of the British Empire, but Chinese because I dislike Indian dessert) and bread pudding. Before dinner, mulled wine. After dinner we'll have the toast to the woman with tokay."
Yum yum, now I'm hungry. Let's all go to dinner at sinmi's :-)
Posted by: Donna V. at January 05, 2014 08:38 AM (R3gO3)
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 05, 2014 08:38 AM (fd0Pp)
Posted by: Donna V. at January 05, 2014 08:39 AM (R3gO3)
Posted by: Lizzy at January 05, 2014 12:31 PM (POpqt)
Kundera writes well about life under communism in his other books: "The Joke", "Laughable Loves", "Life is Elsewhere", "The Farewell Party" and "The Unbearable Lightness of Being" (there are others but these I've read). All of them are written in a deceivably light manner which exposes serious truths underlying everything.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 05, 2014 08:40 AM (N0FA7)
Posted by: Meremortal, sick of it at January 05, 2014 08:41 AM (1Y+hH)
Posted by: BornLib at January 05, 2014 08:41 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Lizzy at January 05, 2014 08:43 AM (POpqt)
Posted by: eman at January 05, 2014 08:43 AM (EWsrI)
Posted by: mnw at January 05, 2014 08:45 AM (68RU9)
http://tinyurl.com/k5zoofa
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 05, 2014 08:45 AM (J96yq)
Posted by: Todd Wiley at January 05, 2014 08:45 AM (lrkg9)
Posted by: Chromoly Man at January 05, 2014 12:36 PM (dRz+o)
Don't get too carried away with that. Franklin was a pretty shitty husband and father.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 05, 2014 08:46 AM (N0FA7)
To academia, this "all through one keyhole" approach is not new with homoconcern. In the classical education era (over longer than we admit), there was a great deal of aesthetism and political-science. The ancients were read with an eye to those angles, and not much else. Then came the Great Books era, which most of us me too remember as classical education, and there was a very great deal of aesthetism to that too: Oohing and aahing over Beauty, schmoozing past the brutal realities. Then came Naturalism, brutal reality to the exclusion of all else, Marxist keyholing, Freud and sex, Jungian dreams and types, the brief but broad Withcraft and The Occult era -- all of which ripped the guts out of content and intent, in the service of keeping the students (or the educator's idea of what the students ought to be) "interested."
The Marxist-literates are in charge now, and they are in fact fuckups. It's frightening to think what the Homo-academics will do before they pass on, destructive and dismissive as they are, but they will in fact pass from the scene. They may well bring down the institution of the university with them when they go, and we need to get past a puke-inducing level of bias to think clearly about whether that's really a good thing or not.
You know, there's a lot of fart jokes in Shakespeare and Chaucer. Pythagoras too. I'm a little weak on Milton, so, help me out here. If Morons ran the colleges, it would be all Engineering in Shakespeare, and fart jokes.
Posted by: Stringer Davis at January 05, 2014 08:48 AM (xq1UY)
Posted by: Lizzy at January 05, 2014 08:49 AM (POpqt)
Posted by: New Yawk Times Art Critic at January 05, 2014 08:49 AM (RJMhd)
Posted by: mnw at January 05, 2014 12:45 PM (68RU9)
Barnes is a very good writer; I really enjoyed "Flaubert's Parrot".
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 05, 2014 08:50 AM (N0FA7)
Posted by: mnw at January 05, 2014 08:50 AM (68RU9)
I put Paglia in the "brilliant mind lacking common sense" category. Excellent insights and then the opposite conclusions to those insights. Posted by: Guy Mohawk at January 05, 2014 12:37 PM (MaP11)
Last week, there was a very good interview with Paglia in the WSJ. Paglia praised the masculine virtues, said society will die if we do not have masculine men, spoke of how boys are made to behave like girls, etc. Excellent. A few women in the comments pointed out that it's great for Paglia to say all those things - but Paglia and her former lesbian lover have a 10 year old son they are raising together. So - boys need dads and all that, but it's OK for Camille and her old girlfriend to have a turkey baster baby and then break up, a boy who is being raised in 2 different lesbian homes.
Posted by: Donna V. at January 05, 2014 08:51 AM (R3gO3)
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at January 05, 2014 08:51 AM (afLO3)
Posted by: [/i]andycanuck[/b] at January 05, 2014 08:51 AM (puxT8)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 05, 2014 08:52 AM (J96yq)
Posted by: Gmac-Pondering the coming implosion, and hoping its 404care at January 05, 2014 08:52 AM (IanLz)
So, Neal Stephenson novels, IMHO -
Cryptonomicon - 4 stars
Snow Crash - 5 stars
Anathem - 3 1/2 stars
Reamde - 3
Posted by: West at January 05, 2014 08:52 AM (gtiZk)
Posted by: New Yawk Times Art Critic at January 05, 2014 08:52 AM (RJMhd)
Posted by: Meremortal, sick of it at January 05, 2014 08:52 AM (1Y+hH)
Best fantasy fiction writer since Tolkien: Robert Gemmell (too bad he drank/smoked himself to death after only producing 33 novels)
Carry on.
Posted by: tangonine at January 05, 2014 08:55 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: All Hail Eris at January 05, 2014 08:56 AM (QBm1P)
Posted by: rickl at January 05, 2014 08:56 AM (sdi6R)
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 05, 2014 08:56 AM (fd0Pp)
Posted by: concrete girl at January 05, 2014 08:57 AM (LhAqq)
Also, anyone familiar with Jarvis Rockwell? Norman's son is an "artist" that specializes in making diorama-type pieces using dolls/mini-figures. Saw some of his stuff at Mass MoCA that involves various party scenes using ewoks. Not kidding.
http://preview.tinyurl.com/n7vrtbk
Posted by: Lizzy at January 05, 2014 08:58 AM (POpqt)
The joke concerns Kate's tongue & a wasp's tail:
"Why, who does not know where a wasp bears it sting, Kate?"
Kate: "In my tongue!"
"What, then, Kate? My tongue in your tail? Nay, Kate, I am a gentleman!"
(approx., from memory. Shakespeare tells it a bit better.)
Posted by: mnw at January 05, 2014 08:58 AM (68RU9)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at January 05, 2014 09:01 AM (g4TxM)
Posted by: Sgt. Mom at January 05, 2014 09:01 AM (Asjr7)
Posted by: OG Celtic-American at January 05, 2014 09:02 AM (vHRtU)
I suspect that if the balloon ever goes up between the Chinese and US militaries, one of the very first things to happen (likely pre-emptively and preparatory by the Chinese) will be that the entire GPS constellation will go away.
Not by cyberattack, but by the simple and impossible to defend against means of American satellites being popped on-orbit by the already demonstrated Chinese ASAT capability.
I have yet to meet any currently or recently serving American military professional who thinks that their service would retain any significant combat effectiveness if GPS were suddenly unavailable. Both the systems and the personnel are fatally reliant on it.
"We stopped getting map-literate and map-trainable kids more than a decade ago," was a frequent refrain. Not to mention that the goddamned maps may not be there either.
Also: civilian navigation without GPS? With Loran gone away, and VORs going away? Yikes. Whole lotta stuff in the larger economy is going to grind to a halt. No massive _One Second After_ scenario required. Just loss of sat signal.
One guy I used to know was a former USAF navigator. Trained in the era when that meant manually shooting sextant from an overhead star hatch on the flight deck of a KC-135. Mildly resenting his career path having been made largely redundant by technology. He would be amused were he to be hastily recalled to service. Come back! All is forgiven!
Posted by: torquewrench at January 05, 2014 09:02 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 05, 2014 09:03 AM (fd0Pp)
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 05, 2014 09:04 AM (o3MSL)
*****
I found it quite derivative.
But it's an integral part of a solid curriculum.
Posted by: OregonMuse at January 05, 2014 01:03 PM (fd0Pp)
I read it with unbounded enthusiasm!
Posted by: Hrothgar at January 05, 2014 09:05 AM (o3MSL)
Posted by: LizLem at January 05, 2014 09:06 AM (Jelfu)
"the teeming earth is with a kind of colic pinched and vexed by the imprisoning of unruly wind within her womb..."
Queef joke. Henry IV Part I.
Bring it on. He war somedeel squeemish of farting.
Posted by: Stringer Davis at January 05, 2014 09:07 AM (xq1UY)
Posted by: Reggie Love at January 05, 2014 09:08 AM (vHRtU)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 05, 2014 09:09 AM (DmNpO)
That's sad and scary! I did a lot of orienteering in the mountains when I was a kid (girl scouts, summer camp) but I don't know what I could pull off now decades later. That's kinda why we've never gotten a GPS for our car - my family took a lot of road trips growing up and we all got good at reading maps. I'd like the traffic updates but I just don't like the idea of listening to some gadget's directions - I prefer exploring. Crazy, I know, because I've become so dependent on the internet for other stuff.
Posted by: Lizzy at January 05, 2014 09:11 AM (POpqt)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 05, 2014 09:12 AM (J96yq)
Posted by: Reggie Love at January 05, 2014 09:13 AM (vHRtU)
I am a big fan of short stories. Not an author I would recommend, very lib NYorky, Grace Paley, shot out of her cannon with a collection called The Little Disturbances of Man. I always liked the title.
One short story that has always stuck with me is Arcturus, A Hunting Dog, by Yuri Kazakov. Kazakov, post Stalin, Soviet writer.
There are so many good short stories. What an art.
Posted by: gracepmc at January 05, 2014 09:26 AM (rznx3)
Posted by: BornLib at January 05, 2014 09:27 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: rickl at January 05, 2014 09:34 AM (sdi6R)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at January 05, 2014 09:36 AM (DmNpO)
Our success on this front rested on two points, one Mr. Franklin though a founding American never ceased being an Anglophile-unlike your current President he grasped that we and you are if not Mother and Daughters or Siblings Cousins and two I invented the art.
//Sir Francis Wallsingham esq
Posted by: Sven10077 at January 05, 2014 09:37 AM (TE35l)
That would be funny to watch if she did try that angle on Varga.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 05, 2014 09:40 AM (J96yq)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 05, 2014 09:42 AM (J96yq)
Posted by: steevy at January 05, 2014 09:44 AM (zqvg6)
There are so many good short stories. What an art.
Posted by: gracepmc at January 05, 2014 01:26 PM (rznx3)
Thanks much for that rec; I'll check it out. I heart Rooski writers. Here's one for you: "The Pedersen Kid" by William H. Gass from "In the Heart of the Heart of the Country ampersand Other Stories". Absolutely fucking brutal. Also anything by Raymond Carver, particularly his earliest stories before he met up with that ditzy third rate poet skirt Tess Gallagher, his version on Yoko Ono.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 05, 2014 09:45 AM (N0FA7)
Posted by: rickl at January 05, 2014 09:46 AM (sdi6R)
Heck, no. I've got a raging boner after looking at that and I'm straight as an arrow.
Posted by: Roman Polanski at January 05, 2014 09:48 AM (eIZld)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at January 05, 2014 09:50 AM (7kkQJ)
Looks like it's a picture of Jane Russell, from what I can tell.
Posted by: HH at January 05, 2014 10:03 AM (XXwdv)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at January 05, 2014 10:12 AM (7kkQJ)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at January 05, 2014 10:13 AM (7kkQJ)
Posted by: waelse1 at January 05, 2014 10:14 AM (5S02w)
Thanks for the rec. I will check out "The Pedersen Kid". New for me.
I spent years on a short story binge. Love Carver. I heart Rooski lit and short stories. Part of my educational background and I got hooked. Here's something that might be interesting. I like anthologies for when I am restless and lazy. It's good to have them in one place. A little suspicious because of the editors, still there's probably some good stuff in here. Pricey.
http://tinyurl.com/lkktsux And of course, Chekov and Gogol.
Off Russia, one of the classics, Shirley Jackson, The Lottery.
*******
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at January 05, 2014 01:50 PM (7kkQJ) Yeppers. I kept the title, and lost the stories to the past.
Posted by: gracepmc at January 05, 2014 10:14 AM (rznx3)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at January 05, 2014 10:16 AM (7kkQJ)
Posted by: rickl at January 05, 2014 10:17 AM (sdi6R)
Posted by: motion view (@motionview) at January 05, 2014 10:17 AM (e6TyM)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at January 05, 2014 10:18 AM (7kkQJ)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Rounding Error Extraordinaire at January 05, 2014 10:18 AM (JcBdH)
Posted by: [/i][/b][/u][/s] Tami at January 05, 2014 10:21 AM (bCEmE)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at January 05, 2014 10:22 AM (7kkQJ)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at January 05, 2014 10:23 AM (7kkQJ)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at January 05, 2014 02:18 PM (7kkQJ)
Anton Chekhov. Happens to me all the time.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 05, 2014 10:23 AM (N0FA7)
I used to read the "Best Short Stories of Year XXXX" all the time for ideas on who to check out. Even though the collections are almost always done by libs, they have to be on their best behavior as far as not recommending any dogs. Plus publishers know that libs are very very cheap.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 05, 2014 10:27 AM (N0FA7)
Re: The bookless Texas library
Photo slide-show of the inside. Very depressing. Just like the "library" in Rollerball.
So, that's the future we ended up with.
http://tinyurl.com/kd88tlh
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at January 05, 2014 10:30 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Bookaday at January 05, 2014 10:36 AM (+HEUC)
Posted by: FCF at January 05, 2014 10:47 AM (Khja4)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at January 05, 2014 10:53 AM (J96yq)
Just one observation. If your attic is not connected to the rest of the house in terms of ventilation, heat, etc. it is a bad place to keep your books. Heating and cooling leads to condensation, which will, over time, lead to warping and/or mildew or, in extreme cases, pages actually sticking together.
Personally, I'd put the books back where you had them and put the relatives in the attic. But that's just me.
Posted by: HTL at January 05, 2014 10:54 AM (QV8Gr)
Posted by: FCF at January 05, 2014 11:01 AM (Khja4)
Posted by: FCF at January 05, 2014 11:05 AM (Khja4)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at January 05, 2014 11:06 AM (Xfl0F)
My only objection is the notion that anything futuristic must certainly be sterile and laminated - with an overtly bright-cold laboratory feeling to it.
What if the architectural features are skinned in dark red mahogany paneling with steampunk styled tarnished brass rimmed viewscreens - lined by rows and rows of uncomfortable rigid-backed wooden chairs?
The reality will be this; an old retail store converted to i-library, finished with water stained drop ceiling tiles, scratched rickety tables, folding metal chairs - all lit by long runs of flickering florescent light-tubes.
Posted by: 13times at January 05, 2014 11:24 AM (fGPLK)
Posted by: LizLem at January 05, 2014 11:25 AM (1tsbS)
Posted by: Charlotte at January 05, 2014 11:29 AM (u1eI9)
Posted by: LizLem at January 05, 2014 11:29 AM (Hslsk)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/04/arts/04iht-15donadio.6482640.html
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at January 05, 2014 11:31 AM (Xfl0F)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Rounding Error Extraordinaire at January 05, 2014 02:18 PM (JcBdH)
Combat Tracking, by John Hurth.
not the best. actually poorly written and 50% is irrelevant to those that know better. But there's not exactly a line of books on combat tracking so it's a start.
Posted by: tangonine at January 05, 2014 11:35 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Captain's daughter at January 05, 2014 11:36 AM (xBYS9)
Posted by: Republic of Texas 2: Electric Boogaloo at January 05, 2014 11:37 AM (Gk2GE)
Posted by: Republic of Texas 2: Electric Boogaloo at January 05, 2014 11:38 AM (Gk2GE)
******
In the Heart of the Country...available only third party. Out of print I think and gynormous prices. My library system does not have it.
Suggestions for affordable place to get the book or just The Pedersen Kid.
I'll try to track it down used or alternative sites. Thx.
Posted by: gracepmc at January 05, 2014 11:57 AM (rznx3)
Posted by: FCF at January 05, 2014 03:05 PM (Khja4)
I have limited space for books and a friend had a clever suggestion. If you have a walk-in closet, arrange it so the short clothes, shirts, for example, hang in one section and put a short bookcase under that area. I got two shelves hidden away that way, with the books two deep on each shelf.
Posted by: Retread at January 05, 2014 11:58 AM (cHwk5)
Nope, I love to read 'em, too. Found an old junior league-type cookbook in a WV antique shop that had recipes from the civil war era women (think it was printed in early 1900's), including Gen. Lee's wife. It had recipes for squirrel and all sorts of other stuff. Didn't include much detail on cooking temps and time (obviously), but it was interesting to see how they managed without modern conveniences, such as chicken salad with a dressing that included mashed boiled eggs instead of mayo. Gave it to my brother, who's a chef, but it was a fun read.
Posted by: Lizzy at January 05, 2014 12:00 PM (POpqt)
Posted by: FCF at January 05, 2014 12:08 PM (Khja4)
Posted by: LizLem at January 05, 2014 12:28 PM (mKRyJ)
Posted by: Frank Lloyd Wright at January 05, 2014 01:02 PM (borYX)
Posted by: All Hail Eris at January 05, 2014 01:13 PM (QBm1P)
Posted by: biancaneve at January 05, 2014 01:30 PM (2sR50)
If you like old cookbooks that have usable recipes, try Maryland's Way, published by the Hammond-Harwood House in Annapolis, MD. You can find copies on eBay, or at the H-HH site (more expensive), or on Amazon (really expensive). There are several editions but they all are essentially similar: colonial era recipes teased from Maryland sources and so includes things like terrapin soup. Each recipe's source is identified and has enough information inserted to translate to modern measurements, cooking temps and times. I regularly make some of the pies and cookies.
Posted by: Retread at January 05, 2014 01:57 PM (cHwk5)
Suggestions for affordable place to get the book or just The Pedersen Kid.
I'll try to track it down used or alternative sites. Thx.
Posted by: gracepmc at January 05, 2014 03:57 PM (rznx3)
Ouch. I had no idea I had such a rarity on my hands. Mine is a 1981 edition on Nonpareil Books; I'm positive I got it remaindered from Daedalus books in Hyasttsville, Maryland sometime after that, but still in the 80s.
The only thing I can suggest is to check if your library does intrastate loans from other systems (I know our county library system does even though I don't know exactly how to use it; out of sheer laziness on my part) which might have it. Gass will be 90 later this year and doesn't have a new fangled website. I don't know if I'd call him reclusive because he seems to interact with other writers but for sure he doesn't actively court publicity. The first story he did which piqued my interest was collected in one of those Best American Short Stories in either the late 70s or very early 80s; it was a story called "Wood" which I don't think has been subsequently published in any collections but I thought it was very good. Best wishes in finding it.
Posted by: Captain Hate at January 05, 2014 03:11 PM (N0FA7)
Posted by: Erowmero at January 05, 2014 03:25 PM (OONaw)
Because he's not an obvious good person?
Posted by: Anachronda at January 05, 2014 03:28 PM (U82Km)
******
A rarity indeed. Anyway thanks for the rec. I did a little checking on him and the story. I am interested enough to do the hunt. It will be fun.
Posted by: gracepmc at January 05, 2014 04:46 PM (rznx3)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3128 seconds, 404 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: All Hail Eris at January 05, 2014 07:06 AM (QBm1P)