May 02, 2014
— Ace Instapundit links this interesting piece.
In economics terms, political correctness would be called a "positional good," a good acquired not for its own inherent usefulness, but for what it signals about the owner. (He says "signalize" -- I guess this is a term of art.)
He notes that positional goods only retain their power to signal something about the owner -- that he is high-status -- so long as a relatively few people also possess the good. Once many, many people possess the good, it can no longer serve the function of being positional.
Think about any faddish mode of dress; the fad's ability to signal that the wearer is fashion-forward is destroyed the moment "everyone" begins wearing it. At that point, the fashion-chaser will have to find some new outrageous variation to wear in order to signal his high fashion status.
And of course he wouldn't be caught dead wearing the togs that everyone else is wearing.
Political Correctness works the same way. As 90% of the population has adopted the basic idea of tolerance, the basic ideas of tolerance can no longer serve as a positional good, as "everyone is wearing it now," and new, ever-more ostentatious signals of Moral/Intellectual High Status must be conceived.
Thus, for example: microaggressions. Begin by noting the "micro" that introduces the term; only those of exquisitely fine taste in Racism can detect such subtle notes. Rather like a wine connoisseur's acute palate permitting the detection and appreciation of trace notes of blackberry and even wet manure.
Those who wish to signal their absolute tip-top status in the #NoH8 camp now talk endlessly about microaggressions, because this signals their (self-believed) membership in a cognitive elite. Should "microaggressions" ever become a generally-accepted way to think about racial slights, they will immediately abandon this term, searching out a Hot New Fashion in Anti-Racism.
He says this:
Over the past few years, spiked online magazine has consistently and robustly defended the principle of free speech against the censorship demands of the politically correct, whatever quarter they may come from. It is great, of course, that there is at least one magazine in which the phrase ‘I believe in free speech’ is unlikely to be followed by a ‘but…’, and more likely to be followed by an ‘even for…’. But while I fully support the spiked line, I also think the spiked authors sometimes misinterpret the intentions of the ‘PC brigade’, and would like to offer an alternative interpretation rooted in boring, old-fashioned textbook economics.Spiked authors believe that PC is driven by a loathing for ordinary people. According to spiked, PC brigadiers view ordinary folks as extremely impressionable, easily excitable, and full of latent resentment. Exposure to the wrong opinions, even isolated words, could immediately awaken the lynch mob. PC, then, is about protecting ‘the vulnerable’ from the nasty tendencies of the majority population.
But if PC was not really about protecting anyone, and really all about expressing one’s own moral superiority, PC credentials would be akin to what economists call a ‘positional good’.
It seems to me that the "spiked online" explanation is the narrative of the PC brigades themselves -- that is, this is how they convince themselves of their superiority and how they justify their judgmental, and frequently thuggish and stupid, behavior. As a Cognitive Elite, after all, they have the duty to protect their lessors from cognitive faux pas, just as a Wine Connoisseur has the duty (he thinks) to inform people that the particular wine they're enjoying is actually jejune, crude, and lacking in angularity.
The snob has the duty to instruct his inferiors.
But I think this author is right-- while the PC Brigade explains its behavior by positing that, as the Cognitive One Percent, they have the duty to make life miserable for everyone else, the actual explanation is simply the signaling of a highly refined palate and a cultivated sense of racism connoisseurship.
I've written about this myself.
What is the point of connoisseurship? Well, as a primary matter, to develop a refined, cultured, and sensitive palate for detecting the most subtle effects of a thing. The wine connoisseur trains himself to pick out "smoky notes" and "hints of blackberry" and wines that profited from "good ash in the soil."Of course connoisseurship is not restricted to the physical sense of taste; art connoisseurs are fond of saying things like "It's the colors that aren't present that really stand out!"
And connoisseurs of music are given to saying things as "What wonderful silences are in this piece, where you can simply enjoy the room's tone, the vibrations and echoes in the walls themselves."
The connoisseur is trained to sense things that no one else can sense, or, at least, no one but an elite cadre of dedicated Detectors of the Subtle and Sublime.
The secondary value of connoisseurship is, of course, impressing other connoisseurs, intimidating non-connoisseurs, and, by these effects, gaining a Social Advantage which maximizes one's chances for financial and sexual success.
I actually think the secondary value is really the primary one but let's be generous and just say it's a nice unintended consequence.
Now maybe I was goofing on connoisseurship a little bit there, but I have to admit, I'd like to pick up that kind of skill. So long as it does not take a great deal of time and effort, I mean.
But of course it would take that. One can fake these things, as one can fake most things, but there's nothing more embarrassing than a fake connoisseur outed as a poser.
I am suggesting, of course, that people of little talent and little liking of hard work and training have created a new connoisseurship, a connoisseurship rather easily achieved, requiring, as it does, so very little practice and so very little reading; they have created a connoisseurship of Racism, savoring (or so they say) each note so delicate as to be imperceptible to the proletarians whose sense are too unrefined to detect anything but the boldest, most obvious flavors.
And by demonstrating their connoisseurship of racism, they gain a social advantage, that of impressing the other would-be racist connoisseurs, and the various stooges and goons stupid enough to be impressed by this shabby parlor trick.
And, as with any fake connoisseur, as with any bluffer, they gain the most when they make the most ludicrous claims: "I can virtually taste the post-war global depression in this wine; there's a character in the sweat of the grape-stompers that imparts to it a sadness that is almost transcendent."
For connoisseurs, noting that a wine has a chocolate aftertaste is rather elementary and crude. No, to really impress people -- or to really bluff -- you have to really commit to it and claim that your tastes are so refined that they can perceive flavors which exist only on an atomic level:
"Mmm.. those d-orbital electrons are really a kick, aren't they? The complexity of flavors he's managed to achieve while working within the confines of just a few electron states is simply magnificent."
And so it is with the Connoisseurs of Racism.
Posted by: Ace at
10:12 AM
| Comments (417)
Post contains 1199 words, total size 8 kb.
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at May 02, 2014 10:14 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at May 02, 2014 10:15 AM (L02KD)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 02, 2014 10:15 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 10:16 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: comrade #6628472837 at May 02, 2014 10:17 AM (mdImt)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 02, 2014 10:17 AM (ioYmu)
Posted by: Blacque Jacques Shellacque at May 02, 2014 10:18 AM (vd7A8)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at May 02, 2014 10:18 AM (PYAXX)
What does a Cadillac Escalade with 24" spinners signal?
That you better keep your pimp hand primed?
Posted by: Lurking Canuck at May 02, 2014 10:18 AM (87y4e)
Rather like a wine connoisseur's acute palate permitting the detection and appreciation of trace notes of blackberry and even wet manure.
====
That's a better description of Val-U-Rite, actually.
Posted by: @JohnTant at May 02, 2014 10:18 AM (PFy0L)
Posted by: grammie winger at May 02, 2014 10:19 AM (oMKp3)
Posted by: jwest at May 02, 2014 10:19 AM (u2a4R)
We do not approve.
This post should be 99.2% recycled. And sorted into seventeen different color coded bins.
Posted by: Your enviro-betters at May 02, 2014 10:20 AM (87y4e)
Posted by: Jenny Hates Her Phone at May 02, 2014 10:20 AM (Yz5ZM)
Posted by: akula51[/b][/i][/s] at May 02, 2014 10:20 AM (BKV7y)
That's so two years ago. Nano-aggression is all the rage over at Mother Jones this season.
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 02, 2014 10:20 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at May 02, 2014 10:21 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 10:21 AM (LJ7Ze)
Posted by: Nick Danger, Third Eye at May 02, 2014 10:21 AM (+nKK4)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 02, 2014 10:21 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: grammie winger at May 02, 2014 10:21 AM (oMKp3)
Posted by: occam's brassiere at May 02, 2014 10:21 AM (vkO9Z)
Posted by: Ashley Judd's Puffy Scamper, aka MrCaniac at May 02, 2014 10:22 AM (HxSXm)
Posted by: Inspector Cussword at May 02, 2014 10:22 AM (Qp0nB)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 10:22 AM (LJ7Ze)
Posted by: Seems legit at May 02, 2014 10:22 AM (A98Xu)
Wow, didn't know sammich was slang for pink pencil.
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at May 02, 2014 10:22 AM (L02KD)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 02, 2014 10:22 AM (ioYmu)
Posted by: NYC Parent at May 02, 2014 10:23 AM (HEo6y)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlinSeattle at May 02, 2014 10:23 AM (+0txR)
Posted by: Fritz at May 02, 2014 10:23 AM (UzPAd)
Posted by: Maximillius Fail at May 02, 2014 10:24 AM (PZsoj)
I can't recall which Moron said it, but don't think of it as box wine...think of it as cardbordeuax.
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 02, 2014 10:25 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: Chaos the Other Dark Meat at May 02, 2014 10:25 AM (oDCMR)
Posted by: Jaws at May 02, 2014 10:25 AM (eKZp1)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at May 02, 2014 10:25 AM (mf5HN)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 02, 2014 10:25 AM (ioYmu)
Conservatives should start beating the crap of assholes that think they can do this.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at May 02, 2014 10:25 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: DangerGirl at May 02, 2014 10:26 AM (Ryac4)
Posted by: grammie winger at May 02, 2014 10:26 AM (oMKp3)
Posted by: no good deed at May 02, 2014 10:26 AM (ILBCY)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 10:26 AM (LJ7Ze)
Posted by: Seems legit at May 02, 2014 10:26 AM (A98Xu)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlinSeattle at May 02, 2014 10:26 AM (+0txR)
Posted by: Tommy Vietor at May 02, 2014 10:26 AM (PFy0L)
Posted by: fluffy at May 02, 2014 10:27 AM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: small town girl at May 02, 2014 10:27 AM (WnGDS)
;-)
Wish I could remember who I stole that from....
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 02, 2014 10:27 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 02, 2014 10:27 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 10:28 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: jwest at May 02, 2014 10:29 AM (u2a4R)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at May 02, 2014 10:29 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: occam's brassiere at May 02, 2014 10:29 AM (MLq9+)
Posted by: eleven at May 02, 2014 10:29 AM (VhqUZ)
Posted by: grammie winger at May 02, 2014 10:29 AM (oMKp3)
I just see it as ever finer levers of control and punishment. What good is "consciousness" if people are no longer "conscious" of it...?
That wedge is no longer enough, let's add some spikes.
These spikes are passe, let's heat them up.
These hot spikes are boring, let's coat them in chipotle.
Add in the fact that you've got these attention-seekers with way too much time on their hands. They've even managed to get us all to subsidize their little four-year academic hothouses where these things take root and grow.
Posted by: Mega at May 02, 2014 10:30 AM (hHFOx)
There's a great Waking the Fuck Up coming...
Posted by: B at May 02, 2014 10:30 AM (VC56G)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 10:31 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: fluffy at May 02, 2014 10:31 AM (Ua6T/)
There's a great Waking the Fuck Up coming...
Posted by: B at May 02, 2014 02:30 PM (VC56G)
It's heartbreaking. no sarcasm.
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 10:31 AM (x3YFz)
Somebody had capers with their smoked salmon. Exquisite choice, but per IPCC guidelines, your carbon footprint has exceeded your allotment
Posted by: Fritz at May 02, 2014 10:32 AM (UzPAd)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/s] [/u] at May 02, 2014 10:32 AM (HsTG8)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at May 02, 2014 10:32 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: ace at May 02, 2014 10:32 AM (/FnUH)
This is it. As a former liberal, I can tell you, they are AFRAID of you. They think that mass right wing violence is always on the verge of breaking out and it's up to them to put the lid back on. This is what the media and entertainment tell them constantly, in subtle and even overt ways. When J-Nap and the Pentagon shine their light on white supremacy, for example, the notion that we are on the verge of a white supremacist revolution is planted in the immature, fearful, inattentive political psyche. The myth of widespread Islamophobia is of course the flip side of that coin.
When people like Ace speak in the language of pop culture, then, it does more good than 10 speeches by Mitt Romney or a landmark opinion written by Clarence Thomas.
Posted by: PJ at May 02, 2014 10:33 AM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: Grammar Status Monkey at May 02, 2014 10:33 AM (Yz5ZM)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at May 02, 2014 10:34 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/s] [/u] at May 02, 2014 10:34 AM (HsTG8)
Posted by: ace at May 02, 2014 10:34 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: DangerGirl at May 02, 2014 10:34 AM (Ryac4)
Posted by: Lance Stabler, Progressive Warrior at May 02, 2014 10:34 AM (MMC8r)
...............
Yeah.. remember in the 70's when all the older entertainers started wearing big bell bottoms? You knew it was time to move on and start wearing straight jeans...
Posted by: Chi-town Jerry at May 02, 2014 10:34 AM (Z7PrM)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 02, 2014 10:35 AM (ioYmu)
Posted by: Sir Pug A Lott at May 02, 2014 10:35 AM (8c12T)
Posted by: --- at May 02, 2014 10:35 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: garrett at May 02, 2014 10:35 AM (Zzeoo)
Posted by: grammie winger at May 02, 2014 10:35 AM (oMKp3)
Posted by: righter at May 02, 2014 10:36 AM (fbUla)
Posted by: ace at May 02, 2014 02:34 PM
So, Womyn's Studies is out?
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 02, 2014 10:36 AM (knoK7)
i think snobbery gets a bad rap, in the sense that virtually everyone is a snob in the fields of taste or knowledge he knows well.
Posted by: ace at May 02, 2014 02:32 PM (/FnUH)
Good point. Knowing a lot about something should never be license to be a dick.
I've fallen for it once or twice. Will never again.
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 10:36 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: joncelli at May 02, 2014 10:36 AM (IEM5v)
Posted by: jeannebodine at May 02, 2014 10:36 AM (2LJqa)
Posted by: Lizzy at May 02, 2014 10:36 AM (8zTpe)
Posted by: Ricardo Kill at May 02, 2014 10:36 AM (gOoFi)
Posted by: eleven at May 02, 2014 10:36 AM (VhqUZ)
People like competing, and people who are no damn good at anything will invent alleged "fields of knowledge" which require the intelligence of a hamster to master
*curses under breath*
*seethes*
*plots intricate plan for revenge*
Posted by: The Hamster at May 02, 2014 10:37 AM (87y4e)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 02, 2014 10:37 AM (ioYmu)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 10:37 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Sir Pug A Lott at May 02, 2014 10:37 AM (8c12T)
Posted by: Richard Gere at May 02, 2014 10:37 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: garrett at May 02, 2014 10:37 AM (Zzeoo)
Posted by: --- at May 02, 2014 10:38 AM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Hi!!ary Clinton at May 02, 2014 10:38 AM (5UteM)
Posted by: rev dr der commisar miller at May 02, 2014 10:38 AM (MtvPp)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at May 02, 2014 10:38 AM (+nKK4)
Posted by: Soona at May 02, 2014 10:38 AM (cepHW)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 02, 2014 10:38 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Seems legit at May 02, 2014 10:38 AM (A98Xu)
Posted by: Steve in Greensboro at May 02, 2014 10:39 AM (bbivj)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at May 02, 2014 10:39 AM (mf5HN)
Only for those that are pure, unadulterated crap.
Raven .25 anyone?
Posted by: rickb223 at May 02, 2014 02:37 PM (ioYmu)
The good gun guys know that it's never the gun.
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 10:39 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 10:39 AM (LJ7Ze)
Posted by: Richard Gere at May 02, 2014 10:39 AM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: John Travolta at May 02, 2014 10:39 AM (gOoFi)
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at May 02, 2014 10:39 AM (L02KD)
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 02:39 PM (x3YFz)
Hi!
Posted by: Lorcin at May 02, 2014 10:39 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 02, 2014 10:40 AM (ioYmu)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/s] [/u] at May 02, 2014 10:40 AM (HsTG8)
Posted by: jwest at May 02, 2014 10:40 AM (u2a4R)
This means that there were 55,116,000 women 16 and older who were in the civilian nonsinstitutional population who not only did not have a job, they did not actively seek one in the last four weeks. That is up 428,000 from the 54,688,000 women who were not in the labor force in March.
Posted by: #WarOnWomyn at May 02, 2014 10:40 AM (e8kgV)
Too much wind, IYKWIM....
Posted by: The Hamster at May 02, 2014 10:40 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: Lizzy at May 02, 2014 10:40 AM (8zTpe)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 10:40 AM (LJ7Ze)
Posted by: Soona at May 02, 2014 10:40 AM (cepHW)
The expertise is simply coincidence.
Posted by: garrett at May 02, 2014 02:37 PM (Zzeoo)
Welcome to the club.
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 10:40 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Romeo13 at May 02, 2014 10:40 AM (84gbM)
Posted by: Billy Bob Thornton at May 02, 2014 10:41 AM (gOoFi)
I thought you were referring to political snobs of the liberal variety. Not people who were wine snobs, coffee snobs etc. I have no problem with those kind of people unless they become useless bores at get-togethers.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at May 02, 2014 10:42 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: ace at May 02, 2014 10:42 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/s] [/u] at May 02, 2014 10:43 AM (HsTG8)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 02, 2014 10:43 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: DangerGirl at May 02, 2014 10:43 AM (Ryac4)
Posted by: Corey Feldman: send cash, please at May 02, 2014 10:43 AM (vmAFq)
Posted by: garrett at May 02, 2014 10:43 AM (Zzeoo)
The modern word is French, deriving from Middle French....
Posted by: ace at May 02, 2014 02:42 PM (/FnUH)
you do know we stopped reading right there, right?
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 10:43 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget
God forbid he ever acquires power and leaves everyone alone.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i][/b] at May 02, 2014 10:43 AM (pASf2)
Posted by: Captain Oveur at May 02, 2014 10:43 AM (gOoFi)
Posted by: ace at May 02, 2014 10:44 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Seems legit at May 02, 2014 10:44 AM (A98Xu)
Posted by: Y-not at May 02, 2014 10:44 AM (zDsvJ)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 02, 2014 02:43 PM
Tell us about it.....
Posted by: Riedel, Inc. at May 02, 2014 10:45 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: garrett at May 02, 2014 10:45 AM (Zzeoo)
Posted by: salsa connoisseur at May 02, 2014 10:45 AM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: Dennis the Saumalier at May 02, 2014 10:45 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at May 02, 2014 10:45 AM (mf5HN)
Posted by: toby928© Gourmand at May 02, 2014 10:46 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: occam's brassiere at May 02, 2014 10:46 AM (QZkRD)
But most of that is based on quantifiable evidence, not subjective opinion.
Build material?
Crafting process?
Design flaws?
Mean time before failure?
Accuracy?
These are all questions that can be measured in numbers or in other objective manners. It's not really the same as "This wine tastes like chicken! Can't you tell?"
Posted by: EC at May 02, 2014 10:46 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 02, 2014 10:46 AM (ioYmu)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 10:47 AM (LJ7Ze)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 10:47 AM (IXrOn)
***
Not unless you're starting a race or have a toddler than needs punishing...
Posted by: B at May 02, 2014 10:47 AM (VC56G)
Posted by: Ace's SnootyFriend at May 02, 2014 10:47 AM (Ryac4)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 02, 2014 10:47 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: nnptcgrad at May 02, 2014 10:48 AM (bCkQa)
Posted by: EC
You want to know how I know you've never read a single gun forum post?
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i][/b] at May 02, 2014 10:48 AM (pASf2)
Posted by: Ricardo Kill at May 02, 2014 10:48 AM (gOoFi)
It was all so silly, but apparently all the tech companies were doing it.
Posted by: Lizzy at May 02, 2014 02:36 PM (8zTpe)
True story: I received an email from someone with exactly that at the end of the signature line. Little green leaf and think twice about printing it out. I was talking to the person who sent me that a couple of hours later and asked him if his IT people realized that the little green leaf eco thingy was placed immediately below the wall o'text SEC boilerplate about mandatory records retention. I could hear the facepalm over the phone.
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at May 02, 2014 02:45 PM (mf5HN)
Well, I'm going to burn 3 tires for every green leaf I see. You are welcome to cut and paste this and forward it to the green leaf people.
need some diesel. brb.
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 10:48 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 02, 2014 10:48 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at May 02, 2014 10:48 AM (PYAXX)
I always think "how fcuking self-important do you have to be to think anyone wants to print out your scary-amazing thoughts".
Posted by: Mega at May 02, 2014 10:49 AM (hHFOx)
Posted by: JEM at May 02, 2014 10:49 AM (o+SC1)
Posted by: weft cut-loop at May 02, 2014 02:48 PM (pASf2)
Yeah, yeah, I know all about the fanboisms.
But there's real data that you can use to compare different brands.
Posted by: EC at May 02, 2014 10:49 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Geroge Costanza at May 02, 2014 10:49 AM (Zzeoo)
Alternatively people might reject it as completely unmitigated bullshit and mock those who think highly of themselves for partaking in it.
Posted by: Methos at May 02, 2014 10:49 AM (hO9ad)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 02, 2014 10:49 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at May 02, 2014 10:50 AM (rt3TY)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 02, 2014 10:50 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: ace at May 02, 2014 10:50 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Chaos the Other Dark Meat at May 02, 2014 10:50 AM (oDCMR)
Posted by: EC
You want to know how I know you've never read a single gun forum post?
Posted by: weft cut-loop at May 02, 2014 02:48 PM (pASf2)
Easy, Horde.
No blue on blue.
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 10:50 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: DangerGirl at May 02, 2014 10:51 AM (Ryac4)
Posted by: Dang at May 02, 2014 10:51 AM (MNq6o)
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at May 02, 2014 10:51 AM (rXcBX)
Posted by: Zombie Uncle Joe Stalin at May 02, 2014 10:51 AM (Dwehj)
Posted by: Soona at May 02, 2014 10:51 AM (cepHW)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 02, 2014 10:51 AM (ioYmu)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 10:51 AM (LJ7Ze)
Posted by: Sir Pug A Lott at May 02, 2014 10:51 AM (8c12T)
Posted by: Methos at May 02, 2014 02:49 PM
Dear hipsters....the PBR? Yeah...it sucked back in the day...it sucks now. But go on enjoying its delicate aroma of irony and hints of failure.
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 02, 2014 10:52 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: ace at May 02, 2014 10:52 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: toby928© Generic Gun Snob at May 02, 2014 10:52 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: nick at May 02, 2014 10:52 AM (EMQZg)
Posted by: Y-not at May 02, 2014 10:53 AM (zDsvJ)
Posted by: ace at May 02, 2014 02:50 PM (/FnUH)
I share your derision for butchering of language.
The thing that pushed me over the edge was "going forward"
I have to suppress violence when I read or see it (and now all the Horde is going to use it just to poke me, but that's just funnin', so it's ok)
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 10:53 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 02, 2014 10:54 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Y-not at May 02, 2014 02:53 PM
Damn it, Y-not, you had to go and break the code, didn't you?
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 02, 2014 10:54 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at May 02, 2014 10:54 AM (rt3TY)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 02, 2014 10:54 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Sir Pug A Lott at May 02, 2014 02:51 PM (8c12T)
------------------------------------------------
Permanent ink, ridiculous clown face. From an overheard conversation. Just sayin'.
Posted by: Soona at May 02, 2014 10:54 AM (cepHW)
Posted by: the littl shyning man at May 02, 2014 10:54 AM (tmFlQ)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 02, 2014 10:55 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: Soothie § at May 02, 2014 10:55 AM (dcmpT)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at May 02, 2014 10:55 AM (+nKK4)
Posted by: Zombie Uncle Joe Stalin at May 02, 2014 10:55 AM (Dwehj)
Posted by: toby928© Generic Gun Snob at May 02, 2014 10:55 AM (QupBk)
*shifty eyes*
Not that anyone here would be collecting hipster femurs...Not at all.....
*shifty eyes*
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 02, 2014 10:55 AM (knoK7)
It is what it is.
Posted by: That Guy at May 02, 2014 10:56 AM (hHFOx)
Posted by: Ricardo Kill at May 02, 2014 10:56 AM (gOoFi)
Posted by: Y-not at May 02, 2014 02:53 PM (zDsvJ)
"Snob" has a derisive, dismissive connotation.
Being good at something doesn't mean you have to be those things. In fact; being good at something carries with it an increasing responsibility to teach others to be good at it as well.
Perfection isn't free.
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 10:56 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 02, 2014 10:56 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 10:56 AM (LJ7Ze)
Thjose are the kinds of snobs I can not stand. And I have had some come to my house and do that very thing.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at May 02, 2014 10:56 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Dr Spank at May 02, 2014 10:56 AM (5UteM)
Posted by: occam's brassiere at May 02, 2014 10:56 AM (cotAB)
Posted by: Seems legit at May 02, 2014 10:57 AM (A98Xu)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 02, 2014 10:57 AM (TIIx5)
Perfection isn't free.
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 02:56 PM (x3YFz)
ok... I'll restate: it's only free to those of low character.
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 10:57 AM (x3YFz)
Exactly...being an enthusiast is one thing...being a total douchebag is another.
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 02, 2014 10:57 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: LizLem at May 02, 2014 10:57 AM (yRwC8)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 02, 2014 10:58 AM (DmNpO)
Dibbs on Kate Upton's butt as my positional good.
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at May 02, 2014 10:58 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: Jenny Hates Her Phone at May 02, 2014 10:58 AM (Yz5ZM)
Hey wasn't that one of those pilots on that flight, God rest his soul?
Posted by: Mega at May 02, 2014 10:58 AM (hHFOx)
Posted by: toby928© Generic Gun Snob at May 02, 2014 10:58 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: DangerGirl at May 02, 2014 10:59 AM (Ryac4)
Drudge has a story up about the first case of MERS in the United States. MERS is Middle East Respiratory Syndrome..... nasty respiratory bug that originated in Saudi.
Pretty mundane article till you get to the last sentence.
"The virus has been found in camels, but officials don't know how it is spreading to humans."
Seriously??? I got a pretty good idea.
Posted by: fixerupper at May 02, 2014 10:59 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: toby928© Generic Gun Snob at May 02, 2014 10:59 AM (QupBk)
That's throatpunch-worthy douchebaggery, right there.
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 02, 2014 10:59 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: ace at May 02, 2014 11:00 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Y-not at May 02, 2014 11:00 AM (zDsvJ)
That's snobbery.
***
Please tell me you egged their house later...
Posted by: B at May 02, 2014 11:00 AM (VC56G)
Posted by: Emperor Joseph II, Music Connoisseur at May 02, 2014 02:32 PM (8ZskC)
One of my favorite lines!
Posted by: Drill_Thrawl at May 02, 2014 11:00 AM (rdiUQ)
Posted by: LizLem at May 02, 2014 11:01 AM (yRwC8)
Posted by: Thin Crust, FTW at May 02, 2014 02:57 PM (Zzeoo)
Fuck off, weak sauce
Posted by: Deep Dish, kicking your ass, and with leftovers at May 02, 2014 11:01 AM (hO9ad)
Posted by: Bruce Lee's Fist at May 02, 2014 11:01 AM (M+evy)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at May 02, 2014 11:01 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 11:01 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Y-not at May 02, 2014 11:01 AM (zDsvJ)
Ace wrote, "He says "signalize" -- I guess this is a term of art."
My girlfriend is relatively new to the art world; more specifically, to the people who populate art world. There are times when some of the artists I know start spouting the latest in unintelligible, postmodernistic jargon. 'Signalize', for example, is one of those words. Barthes coined it, I believe. No matter. Anyway, when I introduce my girlfriend to someone who starts talking in what she calls 'artspeak', she gives me this sideways look and rolls her eyes a little. We laugh about it later.
Truth is, people who talk like that produce the crappiest art in the known galaxy. They throw up this cloud of impenetrable jargon to obfuscate their own inability to execute anything approaching the true and beautiful. At its essence, artspeak is a rationalization of the worst kind. Those who can't do, teach--or blow smoke up your ass.
Posted by: troyriser at May 02, 2014 11:01 AM (gNlvW)
Posted by: occam's brassiere at May 02, 2014 11:01 AM (QZkRD)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/s] [/u] at May 02, 2014 11:01 AM (HsTG8)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 02, 2014 11:01 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Seems legit at May 02, 2014 11:01 AM (A98Xu)
Posted by: Ricardo Kill at May 02, 2014 11:01 AM (gOoFi)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 02, 2014 11:01 AM (ioYmu)
Posted by: garrett at May 02, 2014 02:58 PM (Zzeoo)
Yup.
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 11:01 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: DangerGirl at May 02, 2014 11:02 AM (Ryac4)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 11:02 AM (LJ7Ze)
"The virus has been found in camels, but officials don't know how it is spreading to humans."
Victory!
Posted by: The Goat at May 02, 2014 11:02 AM (87y4e)
Yeah, it pisses me off to no end that hipsters are now drinking small-batch bourbon while sneering at all the racist hillbillies in Kentucky that make the stuff.
I just like good bourbon. Now I have to pay twice as much for it because it's "hip."
Posted by: rockmom at May 02, 2014 11:02 AM (NYnoe)
But they don't objectively taste better. It's due to the person believing that they are partaking in a high status good or activity.
===
All things having to do with smell and taste are subjective, of course, and many tastes are acquired. IE, there are people who legitimately prefer Budweiser American-style lager to Budweiser Budvaar Czech Pilsner. But this isn't all just snobbery.
I can guarantee you that if I give you a cup of fresh-roasted, freshly brewed Ethiopian Yirgacheffe coffee vs a cup of 6-month old pre-ground Maxwell House blinded, not only will you easily be able to tell which is which, but you'll prefer the good stuff, even if you aren't a coffee fan. Ditto for "good" vs cheap wines, beers, liquors, and any number of other foodstuffs. I'm not saying snobbery doesn't exist, when obviously it does, but I think there really are detectable differences here.
Posted by: looking closely at May 02, 2014 11:02 AM (PwGfd)
Posted by: Seems legit at May 02, 2014 11:02 AM (A98Xu)
Posted by: ace at May 02, 2014 11:02 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: garrett at May 02, 2014 11:02 AM (Zzeoo)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 11:03 AM (IXrOn)
Victory!
Posted by: The Goat at May 02, 2014 03:02 PM (87y4e)
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: EC at May 02, 2014 11:03 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 02, 2014 11:03 AM (ioYmu)
===
True, but in 5 years something else will be "hip" and you can have your good bourbon cheaper again.
Posted by: looking closely at May 02, 2014 11:03 AM (PwGfd)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 02, 2014 11:03 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Margarita who wishes she drank more at May 02, 2014 11:04 AM (dfYL9)
And then we have the bossy snob... a bridge too far, folks!
;-)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ at May 02, 2014 03:01 PM (HsTG
nonsensical statements are nonsensical, even if the nonsensical statement is about being nonsensical.
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 11:04 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: toby928© Generic Gun Snob at May 02, 2014 11:04 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at May 02, 2014 03:01 PM (ZPrif)
No shit. The McDonald's All American slam dunk contest this year was won by a white kid. The commentators were twisting themselves into pretzels trying to avoid saying anything racist.
Posted by: rockmom at May 02, 2014 11:04 AM (Q4elb)
Posted by: Seems legit at May 02, 2014 11:05 AM (A98Xu)
Posted by: ace at May 02, 2014 11:05 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 02, 2014 11:05 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 02:57 PM (LJ7Ze)
------------------------------------------
Verbs are so gauch.
Posted by: Soona at May 02, 2014 11:05 AM (cepHW)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 11:05 AM (LJ7Ze)
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: EC at May 02, 2014 03:03 PM (GQ8sn)
whrew!
Posted by: The Chicken at May 02, 2014 11:05 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: alexthechick - SMOD/Orion Death Star 2016 at May 02, 2014 11:06 AM (mf5HN)
Posted by: DangerGirl at May 02, 2014 11:06 AM (Ryac4)
Srsly. All of the good greens I used to eat as a kid that cost next to nothing? They all cost a freakin' fortune now that the foodies have 'discovered' them.
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 02, 2014 11:06 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: The Chicken at May 02, 2014 11:06 AM (yRwC8)
Posted by: Greg Fitzsimmons at May 02, 2014 11:06 AM (Zzeoo)
>>>I think the real distinction here is between an expert who gives you his opinion and expertise when you *ask him for it* and the one who inflicts it on you unbidden.
My sole expertise lies in STD investigations. Were I to inflict it on you I think it'd come across as completely bizarre.
Which is why I sometimes do that, but I've no illusions I'm informing anybody of anything.
Posted by: Bigby's Helping Hands at May 02, 2014 11:06 AM (3ZtZW)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 11:06 AM (LJ7Ze)
Posted by: mallfly at May 02, 2014 11:06 AM (bJm7W)
Posted by: joncelli at May 02, 2014 11:06 AM (IEM5v)
Posted by: Methos at May 02, 2014 11:07 AM (hO9ad)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 02, 2014 11:07 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 03:06 PM (LJ7Ze)
Just call it what it is.
Camel SARS.
Posted by: EC at May 02, 2014 11:07 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 11:07 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 02, 2014 11:07 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 11:07 AM (LJ7Ze)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at May 02, 2014 11:08 AM (rt3TY)
My guess is, this is at the most only a small part of it. Setting up new language to describe transgressions in others is mostly about power, not about feelings of superiority.
In other words, you might be describing the symptom, rather than the disease.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 02, 2014 11:08 AM (BeSEI)
Posted by: ace at May 02, 2014 11:08 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: Inspector Cussword at May 02, 2014 11:08 AM (Qp0nB)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 02, 2014 11:08 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Waiting for the Sun at May 02, 2014 11:08 AM (+nKK4)
Had a fit of pique and half dying of laughter, before the wife handed me a Blue Moon to bring me back to my senses... and asking me not to go ask them to prove both points...
Funny thing is, there were only non-whites (hint, hint) working in there...
Posted by: Ibin Pharteen at May 02, 2014 11:09 AM (zL/eJ)
Don't know about fancy wine, all I know is that on election day, I stand outside the Democratic headquarters and some lady drives a bunch of us down to the voting place. She hands us a piece of paper and a card and we go in and vote. Then she hands us two packs of smokes and a bottle of Rosie and we're good to go.
Posted by: A Street Guy at May 02, 2014 11:09 AM (JBggj)
Camel SARS.
Posted by: EC at May 02, 2014 03:07 PM (GQ8sn)
----
M-M-M-Mike ! !
Guess what daaaaay it is????
Posted by: fixerupper at May 02, 2014 11:09 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 03:07 PM (LJ7Ze)
just like the sandwich made for you by someone else is always better than the one you make yourself.
dammit, now I'm hungry.
Posted by: The Chicken at May 02, 2014 11:09 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Lizzy at May 02, 2014 11:09 AM (8zTpe)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 03:05 PM (LJ7Ze)
I had to sit through two hours of CNN in the Dr's waiting room this morning.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at May 02, 2014 11:09 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at May 02, 2014 11:10 AM (rt3TY)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 02, 2014 11:10 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 11:10 AM (IXrOn)
Is this a problem?
I think the opposite is more problematic: docs with no real training in psychiatry prescribing psychiatric meds about which they have little or no understanding.
Posted by: BurtTC at May 02, 2014 11:10 AM (BeSEI)
#278 I have a friend who is a sales rep for Makers Mark. One thing he loves to do is set up blind bourbon taste tests with Makers vs. some new hipster super-premium bourbons. Nine times out of 10 people prefer Makers. But go into any bar now and all the young folks are ordering Knob Creek and Bookers and Woodford Reserve, for $5 more a glass.
I always got a little bit of a kick out of ordering Makers at bars, back in the days when women who drank any colored liquor were rare. It got me many a conversation and a few dates with some good looking bartenders. ;-) But I was never a snob about it, and I'm still not. I'm just a Kentucky girl who likes bourbon. I think it's kinda stupid to pay $50 for a fifth of bourbon, even if it is really good.
Posted by: rockmom at May 02, 2014 11:11 AM (NYnoe)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/s] [/u] at May 02, 2014 11:11 AM (HsTG8)
Posted by: toby928© Generic Gun Snob at May 02, 2014 11:11 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 11:11 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: The Chicken at May 02, 2014 03:09 PM (x3YFz)
Grilled chicken sandwich DOES sound pretty good right now
Posted by: Bruce Lee's Fist at May 02, 2014 11:11 AM (M+evy)
==
There is a cottage industry of yelling "racism", period. Its big business.
In terms of simple nomenclature, some of this is just pure PC/flavor of the moment. Once upon a time "negro" was the polite word. "Colored" was once the preferred term. "Black" was once OK. . .honestly I don't even know if its "racist" to use that term anymore. "African American", etc.
I've had a conversation with a schoolteacher friend recently about the terms used for individuals of low intelligence. The term "retarded" of course, is no longer acceptable. . .even though once upon a time not that long ago, the term "retarded" (which literally means "slow") WAS the nice politically correct term. Handicapped, no longer a politically correct term, etc.
The real issue here is that no matter WHAT term you use to describe these deficiencies, the term is going to sooner or later acquire a negative connotation. There is no "nice" way to describe someone who isn't smart, or can't walk, etc.
Posted by: looking closely at May 02, 2014 11:11 AM (PwGfd)
Ain't that the truth?
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 02, 2014 11:11 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: Y-not at May 02, 2014 11:11 AM (zDsvJ)
Your Cadillac ain't no hipper than my bus stop
Your champagne ain't no hipper than my soda pop
Posted by: Bigby's Helping Hands at May 02, 2014 11:11 AM (3ZtZW)
[i[] Can anyone tell the difference between day-old and week-old Val U Rite?
The week old is the empty bottle
Posted by: McCool at May 02, 2014 11:12 AM (nCSwS)
Posted by: Arbalest at May 02, 2014 11:12 AM (FlRtG)
Posted by: toby928© Generic Gun Snob at May 02, 2014 03:11 PM (QupBk)
The list would stop at "fapping".
Posted by: EC at May 02, 2014 11:12 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 02, 2014 11:12 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: Cicero Kaboom! Kid at May 02, 2014 11:13 AM (Fp7JI)
Posted by: eleven at May 02, 2014 11:13 AM (VhqUZ)
Posted by: Y-not at May 02, 2014 11:13 AM (zDsvJ)
Posted by: rockmom at May 02, 2014 03:11 PM (NYnoe)
I prefer Woodford over Makers Mark. I actually do not like the taste of Makers.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at May 02, 2014 11:13 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Lincolntf at May 02, 2014 11:13 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: rickb223 at May 02, 2014 11:13 AM (ioYmu)
Posted by: Cicero Kaboom! Kid, aka Sangria Boy at May 02, 2014 11:14 AM (Fp7JI)
As a connessieur myself, let me give you a pro tip.
Aging is overrated. Some things are just better when they're fresh and tender...with hints of Captain Crunch and notes of Cartoon Network.
Posted by: Harrey Reid at May 02, 2014 11:14 AM (SO2Q8)
===
And probably 7 times out of 10, no matter what they order, they're getting the same bourbon, which the bar owner has (for pure convenience sake) poured into bottles with different labels on them.
I like Makers Mark, but its a bit on the sweet side, and I can see why some might prefer other brands.
Posted by: looking closely at May 02, 2014 11:14 AM (PwGfd)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ at May 02, 2014 03:11 PM (HsTG
A man paints a picture.
The most intricate piece of art in history.
Through a series of events, not worth covering, that picture is removed from the frame and thrown in the trash.
A homeless man finds it and uses it to wipe his ass.
The frame, empty, remains on display where everyone comments of the genius of the artist.
So what is art?
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 11:14 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Herr Morgenholz at May 02, 2014 11:14 AM (lawAp)
A significant percentage of bars that carry high priced liquors only really carry the high priced liquor bottles.
Posted by: polynikes at May 02, 2014 11:14 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlinSeattle at May 02, 2014 11:15 AM (+0txR)
Posted by: toby928© Generic Gun Snob at May 02, 2014 11:15 AM (QupBk)
Posted by: The Professor at May 02, 2014 11:15 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: toby928© Generic Gun Snob at May 02, 2014 03:15 PM (QupBk)
Pfffft....
Reverse stroke.
Posted by: EC at May 02, 2014 11:15 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Damiano at May 02, 2014 11:15 AM (j0wOO)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 11:15 AM (LJ7Ze)
The week old is the empty bottle
--- Unless the bathroom was just too far.
Posted by: Harrey Reid at May 02, 2014 11:16 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: Seems legit at May 02, 2014 11:16 AM (A98Xu)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ at May 02, 2014 03:11 PM
I'll admit it...I'm an art snob. I think art is the skillful representation of what's beautiful. Not the paint splatter from some lefty's hoohah accompanied by a 3x5 card with some trendy left-wing bullshit scrawled on it. Here endeth the rant.
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 02, 2014 11:17 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: Dr Spank at May 02, 2014 11:17 AM (5UteM)
Posted by: Race Kindofasewer at May 02, 2014 11:17 AM (VndSC)
Fill a flask at home and take it with you!
Posted by: EC at May 02, 2014 11:17 AM (GQ8sn)
***
Dibs on the dune buggy and hockey mask!
Posted by: B at May 02, 2014 11:17 AM (VC56G)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at May 02, 2014 11:17 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at May 02, 2014 11:17 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Boss Moss at May 02, 2014 03:15 PM (LJ7Ze)
Huh??? The last time I got a shot of Jack here it was $7 a shot. Even Jim Beam which was the well brand was $4 a shot.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at May 02, 2014 11:17 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Buzzsaw90 at May 02, 2014 11:18 AM (SO2Q8)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at May 02, 2014 11:18 AM (8ZskC)
Oh Vic, stop being such a damn snob. :-P
I know some people who say Makers is "chick bourbon." It is sweeter to some people than other bourbons. Never occurred to me. I actually like Buffalo Trace the best, and it's a bit cheaper than Makers, but I can't always get it in the communist state stores in Pennsylvania. I have a girlfriend who only drinks Wild Turkey, and that stuff tastes like gasoline to me.
There's a new restaurant in downtown Philly called Bank and Bourbon that has a bourbon "sommelier." I think this means bourbon has officially jumped the shark. Maybe I'll be able to afford some Elijah Craig again in a couple more years.
Posted by: rockmom at May 02, 2014 11:19 AM (Q4elb)
Posted by: Soona at May 02, 2014 11:19 AM (cepHW)
Posted by: toby928© Generic Gun Snob at May 02, 2014 11:20 AM (QupBk)
I have my favorites. But I don't presume to tell anyone else that theirs is crap. Except for PBR...that shit sucks. It's Science.
Posted by: RedMindBlueState at May 02, 2014 11:20 AM (knoK7)
Posted by: BurtTC at May 02, 2014 03:18 PM (BeSEI)
---
heh,..... I was hoping somebody would "get" it....
one of those jokes that sound better in your own head than on the blog.....
Posted by: fixerupper at May 02, 2014 11:20 AM (nELVU)
Posted by: Sir Pug A Lott at May 02, 2014 11:20 AM (8c12T)
Posted by: eleven at May 02, 2014 11:20 AM (VhqUZ)
==
You're looking at this backwards.
You HAVE TO pay the $20/lb for it, just to prove to yourself its no better so you won't go the rest of your life wondering about it. (IE you're springing an extra $11 one time for PEACE OF MIND!).
And if it really is better, well. . .then you know you can buy it once in a while and enjoy.
Posted by: looking closely at May 02, 2014 11:21 AM (PwGfd)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 11:21 AM (IXrOn)
I'm going to repost my joke which was the last comment on the dead thread since it seems to fit here.
David Axelrod walks into a bar and orders a $5.00 grilled cheese sandwich.
After he finishes the sandwich he exclaims to the bartender , " I just have to say that I just had a $100 cheese sandwich at the restaurant across the street a week ago and this one is great and taste exactly like the $100 sandwich"
The bartender says, " It should , we get all the left over cheese sandwiches from the restaurant. "
Posted by: polynikes at May 02, 2014 11:21 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: tangonine at May 02, 2014 03:14 PM (x3YFz)
Big question. It should be pointed out that 90%+ of all art produced by all artistsw throughout human history is flawed, foolish, or mediocre at best. Time determines the merit of a given work of art: the good works are valued, saved, protected. The bad stuff eventually ends up in the dump (or its equivalent) and disappears from history. And--in my view--the art that lasts is that which strives for truth, beauty, and universiality.
Posted by: troyriser at May 02, 2014 11:22 AM (gNlvW)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 11:23 AM (IXrOn)
Probably the only thing I am somewhat of a connoisseur in is basketball. That also comes from being a Kentucky girl. We're not too good at much else.
Posted by: rockmom at May 02, 2014 11:23 AM (NYnoe)
I know some people who say Makers is "chick bourbon." It is sweeter to some people than other bourbons. Never occurred to me. I actually like Buffalo Trace the best, and it's a bit cheaper thanMakers,but I can't always get it in thecommunist state stores in Pennsylvania. I have a girlfriend who only drinks Wild Turkey, and that stuff tastes like gasoline to me.
There's a new restaurant in downtown Philly called Bank and Bourbon that has a bourbon "sommelier." I think this means bourbon has officially jumped the shark. Maybe I'll be able to afford some Elijah Craig again in a couple more years.
Posted by: rockmom at May 02, 2014 03:19 PM (Q4elb)
LOL, you should see what I drink. It's cheap rotgut called RnR. I would drink nothing but Woodford but it is expensive as hell here. And I can not stand Wild Turkey. And I would love to try some Buffalo Trace but I can't get it here either.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at May 02, 2014 11:23 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Jenny Hates Her Phone at May 02, 2014 11:24 AM (Yz5ZM)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 11:25 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: polynikes at May 02, 2014 11:26 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 11:27 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 11:28 AM (IXrOn)
ace, that guy you wrote about who wrote in the Federalist about the value of experts replaced me in a job once. Small world. Never actually met him. Seemed like a bit of a jerk based on former colleagues' intel from after I left.
And a few have touched on a key principle here. Courtesy, respect, and perspective can make expertise and afficionado-dom an asset and a pleasure for everyone. Lack of same just results in snobbery and douchebaggery.
Posted by: outlier at May 02, 2014 11:33 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: ace at May 02, 2014 11:44 AM (/FnUH)
Posted by: nnptcgrad at May 02, 2014 11:45 AM (Opyrm)
Very true. In college we'd split a six of some good beer and buy a couple of cases of swill.
Posted by: Drill_Thrawl at May 02, 2014 11:47 AM (rdiUQ)
But they don't objectively taste better. It's due to the person believing that they are partaking in a high status good or activity.<<<<
.
Nope, if you like the Bud better than the microbrews your tastes are inferior.
Full disclosure I like both velvetta and camembert.
Posted by: Javems at May 02, 2014 11:56 AM (nTgAI)
Like guns. So long as a select chosen group has the monopoly on the big guns and the most guns, the functional position is obvious. The rest of the people better fall in line, submit to execution as the case EXISTS in Syria no thanks to US Interventionism, worse than ever.
OK, "the economics of what matters and when to care" PC foreign policy of US funded terrorism abroad, fed from "home" stateside. Blowback? Wazzat? The only reason to find funding the genocide of Syrian Christians problematic is that those we fund to do so also blow up cars and such in Bagdad. [!]
Kuwait ‘epicenter’ of terror funding: Washington
By Gordon Duff and Press TV
Friday, May 2, 2014, Veterans Today
http://tinyurl.com/px37rme
Kuwait had been a major terror funder for a very long time, operating “under the radar,” as described by a senior Obama Treasury Department official.
However, in 2011, that changed. Using social networks, Kuwaiti charities, ostensibly collecting funds intended for Syrian refugees, stepped well over the line into pure barbarism.
Charities, many not yet on terror lists, began soliciting funds to purchase weapons, finance attacks on Christian villages and, in extreme cases, place bounties on the heads of members of targeted groups.
According to a Brookings Institute study from 2013, wealthy Kuwaitis used charities to recruit terrorists to follow their specific agendas, with as many as 1000 Kuwait-funded groups operating through Syria and Iraq, each under different orders, often fighting each other.
Over 100,000 Kuwaitis around the world took part in this effort with some listing the weapons they purchased on their Facebook pages. Many of these individuals are permanent residents of the US, Canada, Great Britain and other nations where, under any “normal” circumstance, such an act would land them in “Gitmo” or worse, but nothing was done.
One problem, of course, is that weapons designated for the eradication of Christian settlements in Syria would end up financing car bombs in Baghdad.
The United States only began to notice when Kuwaiti interference led
to infighting that derailed American efforts to overthrow the Assad
government. Only then did the massive influx of terror funding from
Kuwait suddenly become an issue. (read on @ link)
Posted by: panzernashorn at May 02, 2014 11:58 AM (gmrH5)
Posted by: Jen at May 02, 2014 12:07 PM (I+pAz)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at May 02, 2014 03:28 PM (IXrOn)
The infection of healthcare workers (HCW) leads to concerns of human to human transmission.
According to the 27 Mar 2014 MERS-CoV summary update, recent studies support that camels serve as the primary source of the MERS-CoV infecting humans, while bats may be the ultimate reservoir of the virus. Evidence includes the frequency with which the virus has been found in camels to which human cases have been exposed, seriological data which shows widespread transmission in camels, and the similarity of the camel CoV to the human CoV.
Virus hosts: humans, bats and swine. [Camels not listed.]
BTW, Saudi officials fired their leading M.D., the Egyptian virologist Dr. Ali Mohamed Zaki whom they had hired to research the virus and disease, because he shared his findings with the medical community at large in the effort to fight the disease (ProMED-mail 24 Sept 2012). And the House of Saud didn't want that to happen, planning to monopolize ownership of whatever cure, and feasibly benefit financially not only from distributing the illness around the world (bioweapon) but also in having the only medical treatment for it.
Posted by: panzernashorn at May 02, 2014 01:12 PM (gmrH5)
Posted by: toby928© Generic Gun Snob at May 02, 2014 01:14 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: Botec at May 02, 2014 01:28 PM (5/AQM)
Ace, good essay - thanks.
Reflecting on what you wrote, isn't it true of any elitist intellectual movement that people become obsessed with purity, with being ever more refined in order to continue to exclude the unwashed?
For example, you can see this in religious movements - in the way, say, that Islamists are continually splintering, each sub-sect claiming to be the purest, truest followers of their prophet?
Or in the French and Russian revolutions, when the death penalty was handed out for ever slighter deviations from the line of "true revolution".
Or even in something as silly as rock music, where fans become obsessed with making distinctions among varieties of rock that to the outsider (like myself) are utterly indistinguishable.
So, it seems to me that we can expect ever more rigid definitions of political correctness, ever more rigorous tests to ensure that one is free of thoughtcrime. I fully expect that in the near future, failure have donated to pro-gay marriage groups will be damning; and shortly after that, failure to have donated *enough* will see one cast into the darkness. And so it will go.
Posted by: Brown Line at May 02, 2014 01:40 PM (VrNoa)
Posted by: Great Reagan's Ghost at May 02, 2014 02:02 PM (7O/R+)
Posted by: nick at May 02, 2014 02:28 PM (EMQZg)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3654 seconds, 545 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: EC at May 02, 2014 10:13 AM (GQ8sn)