February 14, 2014
— Ace The Anchoress notes the outrageous proposal itself, which I mentioned a day or two back, and then notes the FCC seems to be walking back its anti-First Amendment plan.
From AdWeek:
The Federal Communications Commission is quietly changing course on a controversial study after parts of the methodology were roundly criticized by GOP lawmakers and commissioner Ajit Pai for encroaching into editorial decisions and content at TV stations. . .Regardless of the studyÂ’s intent, itÂ’s hard to fathom why the FCC sent its minions into newsrooms of the stations it licenses and ask questions about how stations exercise their First Amendment right.
The Anchoress counts this as a victory for standing on principle.
We'll see, though. This will be back. It will just mutate into a new form. This is what they want. They will never stop wanting it.
Posted by: Ace at
01:28 PM
| Comments (164)
Post contains 161 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: alexthechick - oh great SMOD can you wait til curling's done at February 14, 2014 01:31 PM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Dr Spank at February 14, 2014 01:31 PM (38LLM)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) at February 14, 2014 01:31 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at February 14, 2014 01:31 PM (9Bdcz)
Posted by: Country Singer at February 14, 2014 01:31 PM (oxjIj)
Posted by: steevy at February 14, 2014 01:32 PM (zqvg6)
Posted by: the littl shyning man at February 14, 2014 01:33 PM (tmFlQ)
Posted by: Dr Spank at February 14, 2014 01:33 PM (38LLM)
Also, they have doll's eyes.
Yeah, they will never, ever stop.
Posted by: John Connor at February 14, 2014 01:34 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: rrpjr at February 14, 2014 01:34 PM (s/yC1)
Posted by: pep at February 14, 2014 01:35 PM (6TB1Z)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 14, 2014 01:36 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Totally not ACORN at February 14, 2014 01:36 PM (jOumW)
Yep. Just a hiatus because the environment isn't quite ready. These are, if they fail, probing actions to test the perimeter. If they succeed, then it's base penetration and the chaos begins.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 14, 2014 01:36 PM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: Jean at February 14, 2014 01:36 PM (4JkHl)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 01:37 PM (thBHI)
Posted by: tangonine (Commander, 3d Squirrel Brigade) at February 14, 2014 01:38 PM (x3YFz)
"Hard to fathom why" indeed. A complete and total mystery. Absolutely impossible to figure out. No clues, no suspects, no theory.
Meanwhile, the puzzling conundrum of the foxes having chewed their way into the henhouse continues to baffle the best minds. Someday new insight may be shed. For now we can only wonder as to their motivation.
Posted by: torquewrench at February 14, 2014 01:38 PM (gqT4g)
Posted by: Drumwaster at February 14, 2014 01:38 PM (K6BSx)
Marx would be proud of his distant Protoge'.
Posted by: Max Entropy at February 14, 2014 01:39 PM (cgtTL)
Yep...they will never stop wanting this.
Because they are fascists and want to suppress or silence any opposing viewpoints.
Or any mention of the Truth, when they are spewing lies.
Posted by: wheatie at February 14, 2014 01:39 PM (eCZwh)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 14, 2014 01:39 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) at February 14, 2014 01:39 PM (GaqMa)
Posted by: eleven at February 14, 2014 01:39 PM (fsLdt)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 01:40 PM (thBHI)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 14, 2014 01:40 PM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at February 14, 2014 01:40 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: non compos mentis [/i] at February 14, 2014 01:40 PM (CnA98)
Posted by: tangonine (Commander, 3d Squirrel Brigade) at February 14, 2014 01:40 PM (x3YFz)
"They'll try to backdoor us with this in a few weeks/months by dressing it up as something else then ramming it home when we're not looking."
Posted by: Dr Spank at February 14, 2014 05:33 PM (38LLM)
______________________________________________________
Funny, that sounds just like my Valentine's Night plans.
Posted by: Max Entropy at February 14, 2014 01:41 PM (cgtTL)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 01:41 PM (thBHI)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 01:42 PM (thBHI)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at February 14, 2014 01:42 PM (g4TxM)
Posted by: prescient11 at February 14, 2014 01:42 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Vic at February 14, 2014 05:40 PM (T2V/1)
I think I've read that cable channels weren't subject to the law (they'd have to allow MSNBC to give equal time to conservatives).
I just perused and didn't read it thoroughly, so I may be incorrect.
Posted by: tangonine (Commander, 3d Squirrel Brigade) at February 14, 2014 01:42 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 01:42 PM (thBHI)
Our All Knowing Benevolent Government is just trying to make sure that their approved messages are uniformly distributed to the peasants and serfs.
Us peasants need their guidance to live our lives in total support of the state.
Posted by: rd at February 14, 2014 01:42 PM (D+lxs)
Posted by: Judge Pug at February 14, 2014 01:42 PM (rfCrI)
Meanwhile in other news, President Obama has rewritten banking laws so banks can launder drug money from pot sales as long as the money doesn't come from 'gangs'. Apparently all you have to do is say, 'this is not gang money', and your good to go.
http://tinyurl.com/ngju5xf
It's just like that IRS regulation that business have to 'certify' that layoffs are not the result of Obama's destruction of the health insurance business model. Just say it, and it is so.
Posted by: Mustelidae at February 14, 2014 01:43 PM (d50nE)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 01:43 PM (thBHI)
Posted by: Angel with a sword at February 14, 2014 01:43 PM (hpgw1)
Posted by: The Fairness Doctrine at February 14, 2014 01:44 PM (SY2Kh)
I just perused and didn't read it thoroughly, so I may be incorrect.
Posted by: tangonine (Commander, 3d Squirrel Brigade) at February 14, 2014 05:42 PM (x3YFz)
the fcc does regulate the cables.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 14, 2014 01:44 PM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 01:45 PM (thBHI)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 05:43 PM (thBHI)
Unemployed is Good, so they're not that far from saying it outright.
Posted by: tangonine (Commander, 3d Squirrel Brigade) at February 14, 2014 01:45 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 01:45 PM (thBHI)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 14, 2014 01:45 PM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 14, 2014 01:45 PM (t3UFN)
Incredible news! Not surprised really, but greatly fearful for this country because I don't hear much outrage. Where are the Republican voices shouting against this? Where are the American people voicing outrage?! Just as Jonathon Turley, liberal lawyer, voicing the same about Obama's new rule for businesses to swear on threat of perjury that they have not cut back on staff due to Obamacare, I hear very little vocal outrage. The Democrats are heading us down a dangerous path.
Posted by: shelby at February 14, 2014 01:46 PM (TKaeM)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 14, 2014 01:46 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 01:46 PM (thBHI)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 14, 2014 01:47 PM (T2V/1)
It usually can be plainly identified right there in the budget under the "Sundries and Evil" sub-account.
Posted by: Fritz at February 14, 2014 01:47 PM (UzPAd)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 14, 2014 01:48 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 14, 2014 01:48 PM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 14, 2014 01:49 PM (t3UFN)
Posted by: shredded chi at February 14, 2014 01:49 PM (z65A/)
Correct. They'll never stop trying.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at February 14, 2014 01:49 PM (zfY+H)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at February 14, 2014 01:49 PM (9Bdcz)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 14, 2014 01:50 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 01:52 PM (thBHI)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 14, 2014 01:52 PM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Judge Pug at February 14, 2014 01:52 PM (rfCrI)
Related: D'Souza'z 2016 Obama's America was on TV today. Suprised me, even if it was the TV Guide channel.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at February 14, 2014 01:52 PM (n0DEs)
Its the certain seat comfortable ones who've been in there since powdered wigs were popular and run every committee, the ones who'll never get thrown out of office. Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, John McCain, these people have proven that they can do ANYTHING and never worry about losing an election.
And because of that, they can utterly ignore the public, even show them total contempt.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at February 14, 2014 01:53 PM (zfY+H)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 14, 2014 01:53 PM (GjYxB)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 14, 2014 01:53 PM (t3UFN)
Exclusive to Yedioth Ahronoth: Secretary of state's brother explains in a special op-ed that John Kerry's determined work on Middle East peace is informed by an abiding sense of the need to secure Israel as a home for the Jewish people.
Cameron Kerry
Published: 02.14.14, 21:35 / Israel Opinion
I have a Contempt Pile.
John Kerry is at the bottom of it, where it's warm and the maggots really get down to business.
Didn't "earn" any of those purple hearts (4 in 1 month? really), testified against all the armed forces then locked arms with John McLame to abandon our POWs.
The level of derision, disgust and hate I have for this man goes even beyond that which I have for Obama. Obama's just a punk. Kerry acts by design.
Seething hatred and disgust only scratches the surface of how I feel toward this "thing" that calls itself a man.
Posted by: tangonine (Commander, 3d Squirrel Brigade) at February 14, 2014 01:54 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 14, 2014 01:55 PM (t3UFN)
Posted by: LFW - Honorary Pointy Eared Vulcan at February 14, 2014 01:55 PM (CGjum)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at February 14, 2014 01:56 PM (zfY+H)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 01:57 PM (thBHI)
And the left loves him for it? He's like Colonel Flagg without the patriotism.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at February 14, 2014 01:59 PM (zfY+H)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 01:59 PM (thBHI)
Posted by: --- at February 14, 2014 02:00 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at February 14, 2014 02:01 PM (g4TxM)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 02:01 PM (thBHI)
President Clinton cleaned house to get rid of the evil Reagan era workers, but Bush left all the Clinton drones in place. They worked tirelessly to undermine and betray everything he did for 8 years with very horrible results.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at February 14, 2014 02:02 PM (zfY+H)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 02:02 PM (thBHI)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 14, 2014 02:03 PM (g1DWB)
Posted by: AmishDude at February 14, 2014 02:04 PM (T0NGe)
-----------
True, but there were many who were loyal Party comrades who never left Lubyanka. Well, they left, but not under their own power.
Posted by: LFW - Honorary Pointy Eared Vulcan at February 14, 2014 02:04 PM (CGjum)
Posted by: John McCain at February 14, 2014 02:05 PM (Q6pxP)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at February 14, 2014 02:05 PM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Street Mimes Local #446 at February 14, 2014 02:05 PM (g4TxM)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at February 14, 2014 06:01 PM (thBHI)
In this day and age, being called a "politician" is worse than being called an "incestuous goat raping lying bag of dogshit."
Posted by: tangonine (Commander, 3d Squirrel Brigade) at February 14, 2014 02:05 PM (x3YFz)
>>This is an example of how the GOP is completely out of its league when it comes to PR. They should have been screaming about this. Every appearance on the Sunday shows should have had a mention of this. Every interview given to local newspapers or local news should have mentioned this.
Instead what does the GOP do....write a fucking letter.
.
.
.And the FCC backed off after they wrote that letter.......
Posted by: Registered Voter at February 14, 2014 02:06 PM (xqjwP)
Posted by: --- at February 14, 2014 02:07 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: incestuous goat raping lying bags of dogshit Local #446 at February 14, 2014 02:07 PM (g4TxM)
The report says that there was an outcry among Republican legislators. So where the hell were the Democrats? Don't they care about freedom of the press? Do they want the federal government manipulating the news?
To ask the question is to answer it ...
Posted by: Brown Line at February 14, 2014 02:08 PM (VrNoa)
That would've been a neat trick considering the story just broke on Monday.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 14, 2014 02:08 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: --- at February 14, 2014 02:08 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: tasker at February 14, 2014 02:08 PM (RJMhd)
In the 2000 Congressional Elections, out of the 435 Congressional districts in which there were elections, 359 were listed as "safe" by Congressional Quarterly. In all of these 359, there was no uncertainty as to who would win. The results a week later confirmed that very few House races were competitive. The 2000 House election resulted in a net change of only four seats (+1 for the Democrats, −2 for the Republicans and the electing of an additional independent). In total, 98% of all incumbents were re-elected.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 14, 2014 02:09 PM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at February 14, 2014 02:09 PM (HVff2)
Posted by: Registered Voter at February 14, 2014 06:06 PM (xqjwP)
I think you missed the point (as did the GOP) that there was ground to be won here and they failed to do it.
Posted by: tangonine (Commander, 3d Squirrel Brigade) at February 14, 2014 02:09 PM (x3YFz)
Its not enough to win the legal battle, they have to win the PR war and get the public to realize what's going on. That's the fight the GOP always loses, usually for lack of trying.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at February 14, 2014 02:09 PM (zfY+H)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette: TGIF + ♥ at February 14, 2014 02:09 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Anderson Cooper at February 14, 2014 02:10 PM (Q6pxP)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humanitarian at February 14, 2014 06:09 PM (HVff2)
politicians come in both sexes, so I'll have to disagree.
Posted by: tangonine (Commander, 3d Squirrel Brigade) at February 14, 2014 02:11 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette: TGIF + ♥ at February 14, 2014 02:11 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: runningrn at February 14, 2014 02:13 PM (o6g4X)
Consider how this would be covered by the MSM- the GOP freaking out about the FCC studying barriers to minority broadcasters. Because racist.
Hell, even if it were covered reasonably fairly, you have too much confidence in the general public if you believe this would've resonated very deeply with them.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 14, 2014 02:13 PM (SY2Kh)
Yeah that was awkwardly phrased. I meant in some seats, you'll see a new guy every few elections.
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at February 14, 2014 02:13 PM (zfY+H)
>>25. This is an example of how the GOP is completely out of its league when it comes to PR. They should have been screaming about this."
Yes, but not just PR, and not just about this. How about being completely out of their league when it comes to defending liberty.
Posted by: rrpjr at February 14, 2014 02:13 PM (s/yC1)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette: TGIF + ♥ at February 14, 2014 06:09 PM (IXrOn)
Completely inelastic collisions (sigh) Not teaching physics this semester but that's not to say I'm not still thinking about it.
Posted by: tangonine (Commander, 3d Squirrel Brigade) at February 14, 2014 02:13 PM (x3YFz)
http://preview.tinyurl.com/msqf8kl
How do the clever Beltway Republicans and their consultants explain how Ronald Reagan won two consecutive landslide election victories, doing the opposite of what they say is the only way for Republicans to win elections?
How, indeed.
Posted by: [/i][/b]KG at February 14, 2014 02:14 PM (IPz9m)
How, indeed.
Posted by: KG at February 14, 2014 06:14 PM (IPz9m)
Ask Karl "I haven't gotten shit right in a decade" Rove.
Posted by: tangonine (Commander, 3d Squirrel Brigade) at February 14, 2014 02:15 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Establishment Republican at February 14, 2014 02:16 PM (zfY+H)
>>"That would've been a neat trick considering the story just broke on Monday."
So where have they been with the Treasury Dept. making up fascist certifications for businesses? Where are their voices on any of the depredations of the last five years? The Sunday shows have been a wasteland of timidity and silence.
Oh, that's right -- they have a Tea Party to destroy. Silly me.
Posted by: rrpjr at February 14, 2014 02:16 PM (s/yC1)
Posted by: incestuous goat raping lying bags of dogshit Local #446 at February 14, 2014 02:18 PM (g4TxM)
Posted by: incestuous goat raping lying bags of dogshit Local #446 at February 14, 2014 06:18 PM (g4TxM)
Figures.
Union.
Posted by: tangonine (Commander, 3d Squirrel Brigade) at February 14, 2014 02:18 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: palerider at February 14, 2014 02:20 PM (dkExz)
You mean like when they failed to stop this? Or failed to stop the Dem gun control bill? Or failed to stop the IRS targeting Tea Party groups?
Oh, wait. They did successfully defend liberty in all of those instances.
As fashionable as it currently is to reflexively scapegoat the GOP for every excess undertaken by this administration, I suggest you consider how things might look right now if the Dems still held the House and 60 Senate seats.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 14, 2014 02:21 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: incestuous goat scaping lying bags of dogshit Local #446 at February 14, 2014 02:22 PM (g4TxM)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 14, 2014 02:23 PM (+lpuZ)
Do you actually watch them?
Or is anything shy of screaming and throwing chairs too timid for you?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 14, 2014 02:23 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at February 14, 2014 02:23 PM (zfY+H)
Posted by: Meremortal at February 14, 2014 02:23 PM (1Y+hH)
10 "Barrie and his boss, Val-Jar, were behind that one for sure. We all know how he feels about Fox."
Damn right, and the FCC brass probably told them it would be a non-starter, but Barry said try it anyway. You know how we and our enemies used to (?) fly our bombers right up to the borders, and then turn around, to guage the effectiveness of the reaction? That's what just happened.
There will be more probing attacks - just because we blunted this one doesn't mean another is not on they way. I sure hope those FCC Commisioners understand that they need to be alert to this kind of crap, and other governing Boards and Ombudmen need to do the same.
Posted by: Ray Van Dune at February 14, 2014 02:24 PM (xhv9C)
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 14, 2014 06:13 PM (SY2Kh)
===
That's a stretch. And ... strangely elitist.
Posted by: mrp at February 14, 2014 02:24 PM (JBggj)
Posted by: Seamus Muldoon at February 14, 2014 02:25 PM (g4TxM)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 14, 2014 02:25 PM (0LHZx)
To be fair, it was an FCC Commissioner who blew the whistle on this.
Though I suspect he'll soon be a former FCC Commissioner.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 14, 2014 02:25 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: --- at February 14, 2014 02:25 PM (MMC8r)
http://www.duffelblog.com/2013/12/run-for-colors/
Posted by: tangonine (Commander, 3d Squirrel Brigade) at February 14, 2014 02:27 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Walter Winchell at February 14, 2014 02:28 PM (N3Al8)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 14, 2014 02:28 PM (0LHZx)
And notice how the MSM is helping them back away "quietly", by not mentioning a thing about it.
Throw this into the picture with the "attestation" that the IRS is looking for about layoffs not being due to ObamaCare, and it is a pretty ugly picture of what these crooks have done to America - and don't think for a moment that we know the whole of it!
The best corruption makes the victim a party in hiding it, and when it come to corruption, there is none better than the current administration.
Posted by: Ray Van Dune at February 14, 2014 02:28 PM (xhv9C)
>>"You mean like when they failed to stop this? Or failed to stop the Dem gun control bill? Or failed to stop the IRS targeting Tea Party groups?
Oh, wait. They did successfully defend liberty in all of those instances.."
Pardon me? The GOPe stopped this? Sure they did. Conservatives stopped it. The GOPe stopped the gun control bill? really? Conservative grassroots pressure is how it was stopped. How was amnesty stopped in 2006? Promethean conservative grassroots pressure. The GOPe was eagerly caving. And what!? -- they stopped the IRS targeting Tea Party groups? Really? Bews for you: It's. Still. Going. On. Not ONE conservative victim has been interviewed by the FBI. I guess I missed that Boehner/McConnell joint presser on the steps of the capital demanding action or the IRS would be defunded.
RINO days are numbered. Cruz is winning. Check out the Federalist article. We've had it.
Posted by: rrpjr at February 14, 2014 02:28 PM (s/yC1)
In your daily meatspace encounters, how much outrage have you encountered from the non-politically active over the IRS scandal? Obama's unilateral re-writing of immigration law and Obamacare?
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 14, 2014 02:29 PM (SY2Kh)
That's a major contributor to our failing country and it's been a decline at an increasing rate for many, many decades now. At the federal level, you no longer have to religiously represent your constituents at home; you represent them when you can but trade votes when The Party calls for it. IOW our representatives are tasked with explicitly voting against their own state's/constituents' interests.
The Two Party system is a failure nevermind the fact that the duopoly colludes to ensure there is no Third Party challenge. It's a disgrace.
Party is definitely more important then Voters in the long term. Voters are paying for it and bleeding out slowly to the tyranny.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 14, 2014 02:30 PM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: Nip Sip at February 14, 2014 02:30 PM (0FSuD)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 14, 2014 02:30 PM (0LHZx)
Oh, right. I forgot. Anything positive can only be credited to the Tea Party, and everything negative must be reflexively blamed on "The Establishment".
Forgive the blasphemous departure from Tru Con scripture.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at February 14, 2014 02:32 PM (SY2Kh)
Posted by: Meremortal at February 14, 2014 02:33 PM (1Y+hH)
Some might substitute "Twit" for "Traitor"; some might be right.
Posted by: AnonymousDrivel at February 14, 2014 02:34 PM (eHIJJ)
Posted by: JackStraw at February 14, 2014 02:34 PM (g1DWB)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 14, 2014 02:35 PM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at February 14, 2014 02:35 PM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at February 14, 2014 02:37 PM (0LHZx)
>>145. "A month went by and the GOP didn't say shit and you interpret this as the GOP is fighting? Unreal."
Yes, it's unreal, and it never ends. They're congenitally incapable of understanding the nature of this conflict. RINOs are loss managers, not fighters or winners. They're essentially scared, deeply fearful, of engaging the Left. Such an engagement would require a traumatic recognition, an intolerable existential shock, of inadequacy. To fight the Left as they must be fought, RINOs would have to become what they despise, to concede that conservatives were always correct. Can't be done.
Posted by: rrpjr at February 14, 2014 02:38 PM (s/yC1)
>>"The GOP loves the IRS abuse."
Exactly right. Just like they loved caving to Obama on the debt ceiling. The NRSC even hailed McConnell as a hero. Losses to Obama now represent a sort of perverse fulfilment of identity in the face of the rising Tea Party. Look for more of it. These are perverse days.
Posted by: rrpjr at February 14, 2014 02:40 PM (s/yC1)
>>152. "Not only has the IRS and other agencies NOT stopped targeting conservatives, but they have actually increased the targeting."
Correct. In-the-face flouting of the GOP. Fully aware that there would be no consequences.
Posted by: rrpjr at February 14, 2014 02:43 PM (s/yC1)
I am going to go have a bottle of organic locally-grown sustainable fair-trade wine, or maybe two, and try to drown my sorrows at this news.
Why will our wise multiracial President not give you Reich-wingnuts what you deserve?
Posted by: Mary Cloggenstein from Brattleboro, Vermont at February 14, 2014 02:55 PM (dqSmk)
Seek mental help. Last I checked, Pat Toomey wasn't "the GOP". He didn't even get a chance to vote on it because the GOP stopped it in the Senate.
Posted by: Occupy Wall Street at February 14, 2014 03:07 PM (X9Mnx)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 14, 2014 03:16 PM (/i3Yt)
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Wrathful Grapes and Contemptuous Celery in the Produce Department! at February 14, 2014 03:36 PM (gmoEG)
>>"What did the GOP do to stop the gun bill? Nothing. In fact the GOP
was pushing the bill hard. It was Pat Toomey who was pushing it hardest."
They would have rolled over in a heartbeat if they hadn't felt the heat from the base.
Posted by: rrpjr at February 14, 2014 04:41 PM (s/yC1)
Posted by: azjaeger at February 14, 2014 05:45 PM (niWgN)
Posted by: The FCC at February 14, 2014 07:52 PM (rCS6C)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.3245 seconds, 292 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Country Singer at February 14, 2014 01:30 PM (oxjIj)