March 21, 2014
— Ace You can read their response here.
Here is what they claim. All emphases in the below quotes are added by me.
First, regarding the political leaning of the group that brought this story to our attention, our article makes clear its left-wing origins, the controversial nature of its earlier claims, and its political agenda.
Oh? They make it clear that the group was left-wing?
Here's what the original article says about the group:
The Koch Industries subsidiary holds leases on 1.1 million acres -- an area nearly the size of Delaware -- in the oil sands region of Alberta, Canada, according to an activist group that studied Alberta provincial records.
An "activist" group -- no political leaning specified. Note, of course, that the media tends to claim leftwing groups are nonpartisan subject-matter-area advocacy groups, with no political leaning, whereas right-leaning groups are always noted as partisan.
Like right here, in the original article:
The biggest lease holder in the northern Alberta oil sands is a subsidiary of Koch Industries, the privately-owned cornerstone of the fortune of conservative Koch brothers Charles and David.
Why weren't they simply called "activist"? Further, why aren't they called "libertarian?" They self-identify as libertarian; in fact, everyone except these writers seems to identify them as libertarian.
But the left-wing group is merely termed "activist" and the Koch Brothers are incorrectly termed "conservative."
And then they claim they made the report's left-wing genesis "clear."
Where? Later on the article says that "environmental groups" and Harry Reid are attacking Keystone, but that's not linked to this "activist" group.
This is what I think the writers are relying on when they say the original article made it "clear" this group had a political agenda:
“IFG’s intention is to demonstrate the Koch-Keystone connection,” says IFG’s Victor Menotti.
That doesn't confess the group's political agenda. If there really is a Koch-Keystone connection, that would not be a matter of politics, but of simple factual reportage. One can come away from reading that thinking "These IFG people are just trying to get at the hidden truth" -- like an unbiased investigative reporter might, or like an apolitical "activist" group might.
This is hardly the writers making IFG's leftwing political agenda "clear" -- especially because these writers, given the chance to specifically note IFG's leftwing politics, instead resorted to the euphemism "activist."
By the way, I see nothing in the original article stating that the "activist" group's report is "controversial" in any way, though the writers now claim the original article made it "clear" that the report was "controversial" (meaning, here, I think: contested).
The Washington Post writers seem to accept almost all of it as non-controversial and non-contested.
They did note one point of contestation:
Second, regarding whether Koch would benefit from the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, we make clear that many of KochÂ’s leases pre-date the pipeline plan, that Koch has not bid for space in the pipeline, and that Koch would not be a customer.
In fact, the original article does say some of this:
The link between Koch and Keystone XL is, however, indirect at best. Koch’s oil production in northern Alberta is “negligible,” according to industry sources and quarterly publications of the provincial government. Moreover, Koch has not reserved any space in the Keystone XL pipeline, a process that usually takes place before a pipeline is built. The pipeline also does not run anywhere near Koch’s refining facilities. And TransCanada, owner of the Keystone routes, says Koch is not expected to be one of the pipeline’s customers.
But then watch how they take that all away to re-assert the "activist" group's claims:
Still, the activist group that is publicizing the figures about Koch holdings in the oil sands – the International Forum on Globalization – is arguing that Koch will benefit indirectly.
Let me note that this same group has estimated a $120 billion loss to the Koch's economic forecasts over the long term (50 years). It takes an awful lot of "indirect benefits" to make up for $120 billion.
But the Washington Post writers suggest that the "activist" group's report still might be true anyway. Maybe those Koch's will reap >$120 billion in "indirect benefits," I guess.
Not to mention the article says this early on, telegraphing its belief in the "Koch-Keystone" connection by hinting at suspect motives and hidden agendas on the part of the Koch brothers:
What is Koch Industries doing there? The company wouldn't comment on its holdings or strategy, but it appears to be a long-term investment that could produce tens of thousands of barrels of the region's thick brand of crude oil in the next three years and perhaps hundreds of thousands of barrels a few years after that.
Sort of conspiratorial, isn't it? What is Koch Industries doing there?
Um, gee, what is an energy company doing leasing property in energy-extraction areas?
Next, they claim their original statement that the Koch's are the largest leaseholder in the province is close enough:
Third, if Koch’s lease holdings are 1.1 million acres, that would make it one of the region’s largest, rivaled only by Shell (1 million net acres through an Athabasca joint venture and perhaps 1.3 million net acres altogether), Cenovus Energy (1.5 million net acres), and perhaps Canadian Natural Resources (717,000 net undeveloped acres plus an undetermined number of developed acres). Shell declined to release its total acreage figures. If Koch's lease holdings are “closer to two million,” as has been said by industry sources we consider highly authoritative, then Koch is indeed the largest lease holder in the province.
Now Koch's holdings of 1.1 million acres are "one of the region's largest," not the largest, as previously claimed, and furthermore, the article resorts to claiming that who knows, maybe they've got 2 million acres.
So now the Post is going back to the earlier claim?
Note what the original article claimed:
The Post confirmed the groupÂ’s findings with Alberta Energy, the provincial governmentÂ’s ministry of energy. Separately, industry sources familiar with oil sands leases said KochÂ’s lease holdings could be closer to two million acres. The companies with the next biggest net acreage positions in oil sands leases are Conoco Phillips and Shell, both close behind.
The original article notes that even the "activist" group has retreated from the 2 million figure, but now the 2 million is conveniently back in play when these writers need it to be?
Last October, IFG said that Koch owned two million acres in the oil sands; now it says the true figure – based on the Alberta provincial government’s mineral lease records that it links to -- is smaller but still an impressive, industry-leading 1.1 million acres.
What exactly are they now claiming is "confirmed"? They claimed to have confirmed this earlier; they are implicitly retreating from that. They first stated that, as a confirmed factual matter, the Koch brothers were the largest leaseholders in the province; now they say they could be the largest leaseholders, if unconfirmed but claimed estimates (by outside parties) are true.
Here's how the defense ends:
The Powerline article itself, and its tone, is strong evidence that issues surrounding the Koch brothersÂ’ political and business interests will stir and inflame public debate in this election year. ThatÂ’s why we wrote the piece.
Oh, I see. You just meant to explore "the issues" surrounding "the Koch brothers' political and business interests."
Which is a recitation of the "activist" group's central thesis: That the Koch brothers' political interests are deeply intertwined with their business interests.
The claim that they were writing merely to illustrate that the leftwing gets all spazzy when you bring up the Koch brothers is risible.
You didn't already see "strong evidence' of this in the left-wing -- I mean, "activist" -- group's report, or in Harry Reid's daily Two Minute Hates against the Koch Brothers?
You didn't attempt to claim any of these facts to be independently true, but only that the Koch Brothers would continue to be controversial on the left?
If so, why didn't you call this "activist" group by its accurate descriptor, "leftwing?"
And why is it that only Powerline's tone and attitude suggests political agenda here, rather than the "activist" group's?
Or, frankly, your own tone and attitude?
Posted by: Ace at
01:14 PM
| Comments (268)
Post contains 1392 words, total size 9 kb.
Posted by: Barb the Evil Genius at March 21, 2014 01:15 PM (yE8uc)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 21, 2014 01:16 PM (rh481)
Posted by: LGW at March 21, 2014 01:16 PM (+BmfA)
Posted by: Bete resigned to just watching the world burn at March 21, 2014 01:17 PM (Lqb+9)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 21, 2014 01:18 PM (rh481)
Posted by: Y-not at March 21, 2014 01:18 PM (zDsvJ)
ace,
Start with the 1st Paragraph.
We would like to make a few brief points in reply to an article in Powerline regarding our article about the extensive lease holdings of Koch Industries subsidiaries in the oil sands region of Alberta, Canada.
WaPo admits it's an article, which means it should be factual, as opposed to an opinion piece.
Shorter response: Suck it Powerline. We didn't let the mask slip, we pulled it off.
Posted by: John P. Squibob at March 21, 2014 01:20 PM (DQZLr)
Posted by: steevy at March 21, 2014 01:20 PM (zqvg6)
Posted by: JackStraw at March 21, 2014 01:20 PM (g1DWB)
Developing scientific ways to force teh wimmenz to bear children?
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at March 21, 2014 01:21 PM (8ZskC)
It's right there in their style guide. Activist is a positive, affirming description that can interchangeably be used for left-wing. What, don't you speak their language?
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at March 21, 2014 01:22 PM (IN7k+)
Posted by: elrobalo at March 21, 2014 01:23 PM (wH5Tk)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:23 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Hairy Reed at March 21, 2014 01:23 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: maddogg at March 21, 2014 01:24 PM (xWW96)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:25 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at March 21, 2014 01:25 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 21, 2014 01:25 PM (CRyse)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:26 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/s][/u][/b] at March 21, 2014 01:26 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:26 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Adriane... at March 21, 2014 01:26 PM (qoKTg)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:27 PM (9W+0f)
And excersize.
Posted by: rickb223 at March 21, 2014 05:25 PM (CRyse)
When I wrestle pigs, I bite them too. So while I get dirty, I also get a mouthful of pork.
Posted by: kathysaysso at March 21, 2014 01:27 PM (6H6o8)
Posted by: maddogg at March 21, 2014 01:27 PM (xWW96)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:28 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/s][/u][/b] at March 21, 2014 01:28 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: steevy at March 21, 2014 01:28 PM (zqvg6)
Posted by: Tuna at March 21, 2014 01:28 PM (M/TDA)
Posted by: garrett at March 21, 2014 01:29 PM (JNU6r)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:29 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: not in the running at March 21, 2014 01:30 PM (3T37a)
The writers know that.
Posted by: pj at March 21, 2014 01:30 PM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:31 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 21, 2014 01:31 PM (CRyse)
Posted by: CNN Editors at March 21, 2014 01:31 PM (0FSuD)
"by Steven Mufson and Juliet Eilperin"
Juliet Eilperin @eilperin Mar 20
Who's the biggest land owner in Canada's oil sands, of #KXL fame? The Koch brothers. My exclusive w/ @StevenMufson: http://wapo.st/PU6RdP
Steven Mufson @StevenMufson Mar 20
Some readers have said Koch is largest land owner in Alberta oil sands. No. It is largest lease holder. The Crown is largest land owner.
How about you two go -- fact check each other for a while, then get back to us?
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 21, 2014 01:32 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: toby928© at March 21, 2014 01:32 PM (QupBk)
Honest. Just ask them. They'll tell you. Tell you true. They have no reason to lie.
What would they gain by lying?
It's not as if they're broke or anything.
Or that the News Room looks like Hiroshima the day after August 6th.
signed Jayson Blair
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Waiting For SMODOT) at March 21, 2014 01:32 PM (LSDdO)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:32 PM (9W+0f)
youtube.com/watch?v=zh7sqDlxBaE
Posted by: Fritz at March 21, 2014 01:32 PM (PnMCP)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:32 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: JackStraw at March 21, 2014 05:20 PM (g1DWB)
WaPo; they are Activists activists Jack.
next query may be sent to our comment section where it will be swiftly deleted.
thank You
Posted by: willow at March 21, 2014 01:32 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: prescient11 at March 21, 2014 01:32 PM (tVTLU)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/s][/u][/b] at March 21, 2014 01:32 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:33 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Jayson Blair at March 21, 2014 01:33 PM (0FSuD)
The International Forum on Globalization (IFG) is a San Francisco-based educational alliance of sixty activists, scholars, economists, researchers and writers. It was established in response to increasing economic globalization, to "promote equitable, democratic, and ecologically sustainable economies
Posted by: willow at March 21, 2014 01:34 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Minnfidel at March 21, 2014 01:34 PM (/rlXg)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:34 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: PaleRider at March 21, 2014 01:35 PM (dkExz)
Posted by: WaPo at March 21, 2014 01:35 PM (vBhbc)
Posted by: Furious George at March 21, 2014 01:35 PM (yFb77)
Posted by: Soona at March 21, 2014 01:35 PM (B8B+F)
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 21, 2014 05:32 PM (yz6yg)
Methinks thou dost protest too much...
Posted by: kathysaysso at March 21, 2014 01:36 PM (6H6o8)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:36 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: willow at March 21, 2014 01:36 PM (nqBYe)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:36 PM (9W+0f)
It's what's for breakfast, lunch, dinner, 3pm stomach growling, tea, post-squash martini, 9pm Game of Thrones feast, and the 2am 'gaddamn, i need a cheeseburger' meal.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i][/b] at March 21, 2014 01:36 PM (twp4I)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/s][/u][/b] at March 21, 2014 01:37 PM (yz6yg)
economic globalization, to "promote equitable, democratic, and
ecologically sustainable economies
Posted by: willow at March 21, 2014 05:34 PM (nqBYe)
-----------------------------------------------
Agenda 21.
Posted by: Soona at March 21, 2014 01:37 PM (B8B+F)
Posted by: Nip Sip at March 21, 2014 01:38 PM (0FSuD)
Posted by: 7 Days in May at March 21, 2014 01:38 PM (WYUAi)
ecologically sustainable economies
Hmm. They sound like a very reasonable group of concerned men and women.
Posted by: Washington Post at March 21, 2014 01:38 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:38 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Nip Sip at March 21, 2014 01:38 PM (0FSuD)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:38 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: rd at March 21, 2014 01:38 PM (D+lxs)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 21, 2014 01:39 PM (CRyse)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at March 21, 2014 01:40 PM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Furious George at March 21, 2014 01:40 PM (yFb77)
Posted by: Another moron at March 21, 2014 01:41 PM (3T37a)
Posted by: angel with a sword at March 21, 2014 01:42 PM (hpgw1)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:42 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Another moron
Not mine. I just like it as well.
Posted by: weft cut-loop [/i][/b] at March 21, 2014 01:42 PM (twp4I)
Posted by: Ronnie Biggs at March 21, 2014 01:43 PM (r7mtu)
Posted by: Gmac-Pondering the coming implosion, and hoping its 404care at March 21, 2014 01:43 PM (baiNQ)
Jus' sayin'
Posted by: Sean Bannion at March 21, 2014 05:37 PM (yz6yg)
Of COURSE I do. I'm not some shrill, feminazi vegan.
Posted by: kathysaysso at March 21, 2014 01:43 PM (6H6o8)
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at March 21, 2014 01:44 PM (DL2i+)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 21, 2014 01:44 PM (CRyse)
Posted by: Tonic Dog at March 21, 2014 01:44 PM (X/+QT)
Posted by: garrett at March 21, 2014 01:45 PM (JNU6r)
Posted by: Pug Train at March 21, 2014 01:45 PM (r7mtu)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:46 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/s][/u][/b] at March 21, 2014 01:46 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: Meremortal, something's burning... at March 21, 2014 01:47 PM (jTKU5)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:47 PM (9W+0f)
Why yes, I can see that this article is just dripping with facts. I could perhaps say that their horseshit smells just like bullshit, but I try and avoid drawing conclusions without some actual smell tests.
They could perhaps be planning on selling their leases for a profit in an oil poor future, too. Or they could perhaps be planning to use space lasers to refine the tar sands in situ.
Just thought I'd throw some more factual stuff to help the WaPo out.
Posted by: GnuBreed at March 21, 2014 01:47 PM (cHZB7)
The only way I could ever work for an ethically corrupt and politically biased organization like the Washington Post is if they paid me. A lot.
Libertarianism FTW!
Posted by: Eugene "Just Plain" Volokh
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 21, 2014 01:48 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 21, 2014 01:48 PM (CRyse)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:48 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at March 21, 2014 01:48 PM (DL2i+)
Posted by: Gmac-Pondering the coming implosion, and hoping its 404care at March 21, 2014 01:49 PM (baiNQ)
Posted by: garrett at March 21, 2014 01:49 PM (JNU6r)
Posted by: Minnfidel at March 21, 2014 01:49 PM (/rlXg)
WAPO - "If you object to our half-baked hackery, it just proves we are right, because we know in an unbiased way that you are wrong."
Could it be that they think "circulation" means circular reasoning? It would explain their readership figures circling the drain.
Posted by: Ray Van Dune at March 21, 2014 01:49 PM (JYBAr)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:50 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Furious George at March 21, 2014 01:50 PM (yFb77)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:51 PM (9W+0f)
Oh, there will be pieces on them, all right. Just not hit pieces. Those are reserved for people who are being "otherized."
The interesting thing is the degree to which things go from democratic party electoral strategy (we need a villain) to WAPO so quickly--and with absolutely no shame.
Posted by: Scanner Dan at March 21, 2014 01:52 PM (DHXV/)
Posted by: Mr Poo Poo at March 21, 2014 01:52 PM (slXFW)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 21, 2014 01:52 PM (CRyse)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 01:54 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:54 PM (9W+0f)
Wow, shouldn't the obama brats dress a little more conservatively in foreign countries?
http://goo.gl/zRQzW5
----------------------------------------------------
I wish we could talk China into just keeping that brace of bitches, you know, as a debt payment or something. Tell them they can do anything they want with them. Just take 'em.
Posted by: Soona at March 21, 2014 01:55 PM (B8B+F)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:55 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: D-Lamp at March 21, 2014 01:56 PM (bb5+k)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 21, 2014 01:56 PM (CRyse)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 01:56 PM (x3YFz)
I am totally (totes....the younger generation) unbiased and I have completely examined this controversy and my unbiased opinion is that the media is full of shit.
Where is my Pultizer Prize?
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at March 21, 2014 01:56 PM (4twGa)
And what is with that red skirt, is that velour? Taupe top and shiny skirt plus black leggings? They are a fashion train wreck.
And is it me or does the hotel look a bit phallic?
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 21, 2014 01:57 PM (rh481)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:57 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Infidel at March 21, 2014 01:57 PM (cojT9)
Posted by: Schwalbe: The Me-262© at March 21, 2014 01:58 PM (9Bdcz)
This is China so a phallic hotel would be much smaller.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at March 21, 2014 01:58 PM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 01:59 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Reggie Love at March 21, 2014 01:59 PM (yFb77)
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at March 21, 2014 01:59 PM (4twGa)
Geez! If they were white us down South would call them "white trash," How embarrassing....
Posted by: backhoe at March 21, 2014 02:00 PM (ULH4o)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 02:00 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Meremortal, something's burning... at March 21, 2014 02:00 PM (jTKU5)
Posted by: Infidel at March 21, 2014 02:00 PM (cojT9)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 02:00 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 02:01 PM (x3YFz)
I wonder how Michelle's calligraphy lessons went. I bet what they taught her to write was - 'We owe Beijing $3 trillion.'
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 21, 2014 02:02 PM (rh481)
Posted by: Furious George at March 21, 2014 02:02 PM (yFb77)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 21, 2014 02:03 PM (CRyse)
Posted by: Mirror-Universe Mitt Romney at March 21, 2014 02:03 PM (9W+0f)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/s][/u][/b] at March 21, 2014 02:04 PM (yz6yg)
Posted by: The Washington Post at March 21, 2014 02:04 PM (kUgpq)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 02:05 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: grammie winger at March 21, 2014 02:05 PM (Vg/fl)
Posted by: BossyBodine at March 21, 2014 02:05 PM (2LJqa)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 21, 2014 02:06 PM (rh481)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 02:06 PM (x3YFz)
oh, and since I'm being mean and shallow, I'll offer that the obama girls look like guys.
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 06:01 PM (x3YFz)
-------------------------------------------------
What I heard was "boy" in that statement.
Rayciss!
Posted by: Soona at March 21, 2014 02:06 PM (B8B+F)
I would think that by now someone would have told Michelle that when out in public she needs to smile and act interested. She always looks pissed off or bored.
Posted by: Cheri at March 21, 2014 02:06 PM (G+Wff)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 21, 2014 06:06 PM (rh481)
--------------------------------------------
Ow! That's going to leave a mark.
Posted by: Soona at March 21, 2014 02:08 PM (B8B+F)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 02:08 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Amy Carter at March 21, 2014 02:09 PM (yFb77)
KOOOOOOOOCH!!!!!
Posted by: Mikey NTH - We will be cold-patching the parking lot at the Outrage Outlet soon! at March 21, 2014 02:11 PM (gmoEG)
Posted by: Dr Spank at March 21, 2014 02:11 PM (slXFW)
Posted by: Infidel at March 21, 2014 02:11 PM (cojT9)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 02:11 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at March 21, 2014 02:12 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: Furious George at March 21, 2014 02:12 PM (yFb77)
Posted by: Infidel at March 21, 2014 02:13 PM (cojT9)
Posted by: Baron Von Ottomatic at March 21, 2014 02:13 PM (kUgpq)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 21, 2014 02:13 PM (CRyse)
Posted by: Infidel at March 21, 2014 06:11 PM (cojT9)
---------------------------------------------
Yeah, but the two nuclear winters will make time seem to go fast.
Posted by: Soona at March 21, 2014 02:13 PM (B8B+F)
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at March 21, 2014 02:14 PM (4twGa)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 02:14 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Baron Von Ottomatic at March 21, 2014 02:15 PM (kUgpq)
Yeah, but the two nuclear winters will make time seem to go fast.
Well yeah, there will be that as a distraction. I need to learn how to brew beer.
Posted by: Infidel at March 21, 2014 02:15 PM (cojT9)
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/s][/u][/b] at March 21, 2014 02:16 PM (yz6yg)
My oldest daughter would probably now hold the world record for being photographed the most times with her middle finger extended.
That being said, I would give the kids a break.
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at March 21, 2014 02:17 PM (4twGa)
I just bingled Malia Obama, clicked on images, and found plenty of pictures of her smiling. It probably depends on where you're looking at pictures. Any British press site that publishes Obama criticisms is going to find goofy/angry pictures of the Obamas. It's what they do.
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at March 21, 2014 02:17 PM (P7Wsr)
Posted by: --- at March 21, 2014 02:17 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Infidel at March 21, 2014 02:17 PM (cojT9)
Thought we were heading to Venezuela grade of sux?
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 21, 2014 02:17 PM (rh481)
Posted by: Baron Von Ottomatic at March 21, 2014 06:13 PM (kUgpq)
------------------------------------------------
If I had those perks, I'd be smilin' and well-dressed. And you'd never hear a word of hate towards America and freedom pass my lips.
Posted by: Soona at March 21, 2014 02:17 PM (B8B+F)
164 Must have villain, must have villain to unite dispirited base after ObamaCare cratered....
Well yeah...but demonizing the Koch brothers is a two-fer.
1) It discourages other wealthy donors from donating to conservative/libertarian causes.
2) Gives the left a villain to point to.
And also.... 3) Squirrel!
So I guess it's a three-fer.
Posted by: wheatie at March 21, 2014 02:18 PM (5jdPE)
Posted by: Won Ton Po at March 21, 2014 02:18 PM (8T2uO)
Posted by: Dr Spank at March 21, 2014 02:18 PM (slXFW)
Posted by: rickb223 at March 21, 2014 02:19 PM (CRyse)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 21, 2014 02:19 PM (XyM/Y)
Posted by: fluffy at March 21, 2014 02:19 PM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: Mallamutt, RINO President for Life at March 21, 2014 02:19 PM (4twGa)
Posted by: Furious George at March 21, 2014 02:19 PM (yFb77)
Who in the hell picks a Women's bracket?
Posted by: tu3031 at March 21, 2014 02:20 PM (yagOO)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at March 21, 2014 02:20 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: Dr Spank at March 21, 2014 02:22 PM (slXFW)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 02:22 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: grammie winger at March 21, 2014 02:22 PM (Vg/fl)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 21, 2014 02:22 PM (XyM/Y)
Posted by: fluffy at March 21, 2014 02:23 PM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 02:23 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Dr Spank at March 21, 2014 02:25 PM (slXFW)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 02:25 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 21, 2014 02:26 PM (XyM/Y)
Posted by: Dr Spank at March 21, 2014 02:26 PM (slXFW)
No wonder TFG is always golfing.
Posted by: tu3031 at March 21, 2014 02:27 PM (yagOO)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 21, 2014 02:27 PM (XyM/Y)
Can you name a politician who hasn't had their non-adult kids show up at political events for the cameras?
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at March 21, 2014 02:27 PM (P7Wsr)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 06:22 PM (x3YFz)
--------------------------------------------
Absolutely. And I'd be kind and courteous to those offering me their hospitality. A form of behaviour that seems to escape this dreadful family.
Posted by: Soona at March 21, 2014 02:27 PM (B8B+F)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 02:28 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 21, 2014 02:29 PM (XyM/Y)
Because that's some good coke Kobe must have been on.
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/i][/b][/s][/s] at March 21, 2014 02:30 PM (P7Wsr)
If I haven't been banned yet, it's a good indication that there's a lot of leeway.
Why is it suddenly dark and smells of wood?
Posted by: rickb223 at March 21, 2014 02:30 PM (d0Dmj)
Posted by: tu3031 at March 21, 2014 02:31 PM (yagOO)
Posted by: thunderb at March 21, 2014 02:31 PM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Pug Train at March 21, 2014 02:31 PM (r7mtu)
Posted by: Meremortal, something's burning... at March 21, 2014 02:31 PM (jTKU5)
Who in the hell picks a Women's bracket?
Must. Not. Comment.
Posted by: rickb223 at March 21, 2014 02:32 PM (d0Dmj)
It's the sheer hypocrisy of it that gets to me...
Barky and Mooch claim to be for the poor and disadvantaged.
Yet they engage in a lavish and imperialistic lifestyle, wasting the money that has been borrowed to keep the country going.
It would be one thing, if the US was solvent and had a surplus.
But our government is borrowing money!
We cannot afford to support a King and Queen, and their two little princesses...not with borrowed money.
Our children are being made poorer by their wasteful spending.
Posted by: wheatie at March 21, 2014 02:33 PM (5jdPE)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 02:33 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Dr Spank at March 21, 2014 02:33 PM (slXFW)
Posted by: fluffy at March 21, 2014 06:23 PM (Ua6T/)
You can't spell at all.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo (anti-Irish Bigot) at March 21, 2014 02:34 PM (QFxY5)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 21, 2014 06:29 PM (XyM/Y)
----------------------------------------------------
I've been around for some time now, and I don't think there's any comparison that would be fair, except maybe Jackie Kennedy. Despite her husbands name and reputation, she was always classy to everyone around her.
The Obummers stick their asses in America's face when they go somewhere.
Posted by: Soona at March 21, 2014 02:34 PM (B8B+F)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 02:34 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: --- at March 21, 2014 02:34 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at March 21, 2014 02:35 PM (oFCZn)
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at March 21, 2014 02:36 PM (KL49F)
He must have been trolling Steve Nash.
Posted by: Baron Von Ottomatic at March 21, 2014 02:36 PM (kUgpq)
Posted by: garrett at March 21, 2014 02:36 PM (UHqtd)
Laminating 'em.
Posted by: rickb223 at March 21, 2014 02:37 PM (d0Dmj)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 02:38 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: no good deed at March 21, 2014 02:38 PM (vBhbc)
Posted by: Dr Spank at March 21, 2014 02:38 PM (slXFW)
When you are receiving flak, you are over the target.
Posted by: rickb223 at March 21, 2014 02:38 PM (d0Dmj)
They are lying liars.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at March 21, 2014 02:39 PM (b/lt+)
Posted by: tangonine at March 21, 2014 02:39 PM (x3YFz)
Posted by: garrett at March 21, 2014 02:39 PM (UHqtd)
Posted by: Infidel at March 21, 2014 02:39 PM (cojT9)
I heard ya could win, like...$22.50
Posted by: tu3031 at March 21, 2014 02:40 PM (yagOO)
Posted by: Waterhouse at March 21, 2014 02:40 PM (a/fgo)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at March 21, 2014 02:41 PM (Dsdvi)
230...IOW, Democrats.
Yup.
They demonize 'The Rich'...yet engage in lifestyles of The Rich, using money that our children will have to pay back.
Posted by: wheatie at March 21, 2014 02:42 PM (5jdPE)
Posted by: garrett at March 21, 2014 02:42 PM (UHqtd)
Posted by: 98ZJUSMC Rounding Error Extraordinaire at March 21, 2014 02:42 PM (dFOie)
Posted by: Axeman at March 21, 2014 02:43 PM (cAr2x)
Sadly, doesn't matter to the Obama fluffers and Democrat/Leftist cockholstering tools in the media. They sold out the Fourth Estate long ago and are irretrievably lost on their intended role as fact based gatekeepers and a truly free press. Euphemistically, they have become the 'plate'/'bottom' in a scatological relationship where they seem to relish being shit on by Obama's administration. It is growing tiresome where every time a dump is taken on them by Obama's crew, we see feigned momentary upset followed by slavish direct and indirect lying to those they are supposed to serve--the body politic. *spit*
Simply stated (and but for the need to set the record straight), they are not morally worth your time.
Posted by: eureka! at March 21, 2014 02:43 PM (06U7A)
By 4th of July, I imagine.
Posted by: Baron Von Ottomatic at March 21, 2014 02:43 PM (kUgpq)
Posted by: WalrusRex at March 21, 2014 02:44 PM (Mogjf)
Posted by: votermom at March 21, 2014 02:44 PM (GSIDW)
Posted by: Travis McGee at March 21, 2014 02:45 PM (Ph479)
Posted by: A message at March 21, 2014 02:50 PM (fFh95)
Posted by: blaster at March 21, 2014 02:54 PM (4NnP2)
Posted by: kbdabear at March 21, 2014 02:56 PM (aTXUx)
Posted by: Stringer Davis at March 21, 2014 02:57 PM (xq1UY)
Posted by: Null at March 21, 2014 03:02 PM (DuH+r)
Posted by: Bivalve Curious at March 21, 2014 03:29 PM (aGqSh)
Posted by: Socratease at March 21, 2014 04:29 PM (82qVG)
Posted by: Stark Dickflüssig at March 21, 2014 04:32 PM (MbqmP)
*Except for Sharyl Attkisson - who is more like "Tess Truheart".
Posted by: [/i] [/s] [/u] [/b] An Observation at March 21, 2014 05:25 PM (ylhEn)
Posted by: CanadianGuyEh at March 21, 2014 06:14 PM (1PqiV)
Posted by: Veritas at March 22, 2014 12:25 PM (aqcYr)
Posted by: Deshroomius Bandersnatch at March 22, 2014 11:13 PM (w45V0)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.4324 seconds, 396 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Zakn at March 21, 2014 01:15 PM (7F9i5)