February 05, 2014
— DrewM Jeb Bush: Tanned, Rested, Moderate!
“Bush’s speeches are getting better, tighter, and more campaigny, from what I’ve noticed,” a senior Florida republican strategist says. “I still think Jeb is only a three-in-ten shot to go, but if you’re in his shoes, and Chris Christie has taken a huge hit in stock value — wouldn’t you wait and see? If Christie survives and runs, it’s a harder proposition by far, obviously.”...
The third issue that could cause Bush headaches as a presidential candidate [after Bush fatigue and amnesty] is his support for Common Core. He’s not backing down, despite the controversy, declaring at a charter high school in Hialeah last week, “The aspiration ought to be: Every child should be college- or career-ready. And we should benchmark ourselves to the best in the world. The good-faith effort of Common Core State Standards and now these Florida standards is the right path to be on.”
The problem for Bush is that a vocal chunk of the conservative grassroots thinks Common Core is precisely the opposite of a “good-faith effort.”
Via Andy let me add a fourth issues that would cause heartburn if Jeb were to run...global warming.
“I can see him coming around to some combination of a cap-and-trade program as the best alternative to regulate and at the same time not completely abandoning his principles on something by going to a place where we’re scientifically uncertain,” said David Struhs, who served six years as the Bush-appointed head of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection.
“Those are the kinds of conversations that he can engage in in a way that a less familiar politician, particular in the Republican Party, can’t do, even if they’re intellectually capable of it,” Struhs added. “They have to go hard right to prove they’re conservative. Jeb Bush is given a pass there because he’s already been there. He’s already done it.”
Um, I'm not sure conservatives buy Jeb Bush is a conservative.
Yes people will point to his work on school choice but is there any evidence that it moves votes? It's the right policy (at the state and local level) but there's no reason to believe that another massive reorganization of federal education policies will lead to more local control and choice. A truly conservative national education policy is...get the hell out of education policy at the federal level.
Some people are committed to running through every warmed over moderate before they are willing to even consider an actual conservative. Unfortunately those people are the ones who run and fund the GOP.
Related for fun: Mitt Romney is back to thinking global warming is a problem.
“It is a Democrat issue but I think it’s an issue for both parties,” he said. “If you think global warming is just in America, it’s not just America. There needs to be a global understanding and a real global effort. There’s no global effort whatsoever.”
Posted by: DrewM at
10:19 AM
| Comments (428)
Post contains 528 words, total size 4 kb.
Posted by: Black Orchid at February 05, 2014 10:20 AM (pS66t)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 10:20 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Black Orchid at February 05, 2014 10:21 AM (pS66t)
Posted by: Andy at February 05, 2014 10:21 AM (vGQV1)
Posted by: dogfish at February 05, 2014 10:22 AM (NuPNl)
Posted by: Hank Johnson at February 05, 2014 10:22 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: Andy at February 05, 2014 10:22 AM (vGQV1)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at February 05, 2014 10:22 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 10:23 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: maddogg at February 05, 2014 10:23 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: shredded chi - cereal killer at February 05, 2014 10:23 AM (u8vcQ)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at February 05, 2014 10:23 AM (0jFxY)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at February 05, 2014 10:23 AM (7ObY1)
He's fucking coward statist fuck.
Posted by: weft cut-loop[/i] [/b] at February 05, 2014 10:24 AM (cxs6V)
I posted a couple weeks back that the wife said she saw him in LAX and he looked like he'd been dragged behind a pickup for about a mile.
She even considered buying him a bottle of water (that's how wrecked he looked) but then quickly remembered she didn't like him and pressed on to get her bags.
Posted by: tangonine at February 05, 2014 10:24 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: MikeH at February 05, 2014 10:24 AM (cYaNh)
Posted by: Nip Sip at February 05, 2014 10:24 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: Justin Lately Jr at February 05, 2014 10:24 AM (nQE02)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 05, 2014 10:24 AM (659DL)
I wonder why anyone thinks the GOP misunderstands anything. They know what they're doing. That their goals and the goals of their base do not coincide is not coincidence. >_> It is simply a problem for them to work through.
No vote for the GOP, ever. Rather, I'll watch it burn.
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at February 05, 2014 10:24 AM (AaIQj)
Posted by: MTF at February 05, 2014 10:24 AM (F58x4)
*double face palm*
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 02:23 PM (PYAXX)
The pain is so great I will up that with...
*triple dog-dare face palm*
Posted by: EC at February 05, 2014 10:24 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at February 05, 2014 10:25 AM (0jFxY)
Posted by: Nip Sip at February 05, 2014 10:25 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at February 05, 2014 10:25 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: joncelli at February 05, 2014 10:25 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Soothsayer and the Cult Jam at February 05, 2014 10:25 AM (iwCB8)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 05, 2014 10:25 AM (xorT2)
Posted by: MikeH at February 05, 2014 10:25 AM (cYaNh)
Posted by: RWC at February 05, 2014 10:25 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at February 05, 2014 10:26 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Duke at February 05, 2014 10:26 AM (d3clc)
The correct phrasing is "I give it one chance in three."
Then you eat a forkful of steak.
Posted by: Waterhouse at February 05, 2014 10:26 AM (hBNxo)
I'm in the camp now where I don't think they do. They understand it quite well and want nothing more than to jettison it so they can turn to port.
Posted by: dogfish at February 05, 2014 10:26 AM (NuPNl)
“It is a Democrat issue but I think it’s an issue for both parties,” he said.
FFS, can't we find a politician who has enough brains to know that AGW is baloney, and start talking about the flaws in the data, so when the fucking thing comes unravelled, we will be there saying told ya so?
In order to make that judgement, the politicians will have to get their heads around some facts and data, so they can make the call on how far we get out ahead of the coming Globaloney crash and burn. It is coming - just a matter of how soon.
Posted by: Ray Van Dune at February 05, 2014 10:26 AM (sG76x)
Posted by: MikeH at February 05, 2014 10:26 AM (cYaNh)
Posted by: RWC at February 05, 2014 10:26 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Jose at February 05, 2014 10:27 AM (zc/sw)
Posted by: Burn the Witch at February 05, 2014 10:27 AM (0jFxY)
Posted by: Mike Giles at February 05, 2014 10:27 AM (QM4YC)
Posted by: @JohnTant at February 05, 2014 10:27 AM (eytER)
Living in the northern forest where trees over top all the power lines everywhere.
I can sympathize with you.
You know those trees will fall one day, and they will take down the power line, and no one will do anything about it until the power goes out then it's panic time.
Posted by: Justin Lately Jr at February 05, 2014 10:27 AM (nQE02)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at February 05, 2014 10:27 AM (DmNpO)
re-running Mittens is another, as is passing amnesty, no matter how they package it.
Posted by: redc1c4 at February 05, 2014 10:28 AM (q+fqH)
Posted by: Jonny Huntsman at February 05, 2014 10:28 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Nip Sip at February 05, 2014 10:28 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 10:28 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: MikeH at February 05, 2014 02:25 PM (cYaNh)
Nobody does a triple double dog dare!
Posted by: EC at February 05, 2014 10:28 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Romeo13 at February 05, 2014 10:28 AM (84gbM)
Posted by: dogfish at February 05, 2014 02:26 PM (NuPNl)
That is how I feel as well. It is why I will simply not vote for them anymore.
I mean, really, once the mask has come off, does anyone still buy the act when the mask is put back on?
Posted by: Kinley Ardal at February 05, 2014 10:28 AM (AaIQj)
Posted by: Michael at February 05, 2014 10:28 AM (smKbx)
Posted by: El Gobernador Jeb Bush at February 05, 2014 10:28 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: MikeH at February 05, 2014 10:28 AM (cYaNh)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 05, 2014 10:28 AM (659DL)
Posted by: no good deed at February 05, 2014 10:28 AM (vBhbc)
Posted by: Boomslang Joe at February 05, 2014 10:28 AM (0h8aq)
Posted by: St Sandra at February 05, 2014 10:29 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: Y-not aka t-shirt at February 05, 2014 10:29 AM (zDsvJ)
Posted by: Grand Old Party of Marxist Quislings at February 05, 2014 10:29 AM (JQuNB)
Then it's agreed, we should be the last to do anything so we don't screw ourselves over. So as long as China, India, and Africa hold out we should as well.
Posted by: Adam Smith's Invsible Pimp Hand at February 05, 2014 10:29 AM (WdbF7)
Posted by: Bigby's Germy Hands at February 05, 2014 10:29 AM (KgN8K)
Posted by: MTF at February 05, 2014 10:29 AM (F58x4)
Posted by: t-bird at February 05, 2014 10:29 AM (FcR7P)
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at February 05, 2014 10:29 AM (kxSZr)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at February 05, 2014 10:29 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 10:29 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 05, 2014 10:30 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 05, 2014 10:30 AM (tmzN0)
Posted by: The Whigs at February 05, 2014 10:30 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: MikeH at February 05, 2014 10:30 AM (cYaNh)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 05, 2014 10:30 AM (659DL)
Why are we focusing so tightly on 2016. Isn't there some other political event that happens before then? This is one of the reasons DC is so fucked up. The campaigning never stops. 2016 is a long time from now, and the SCOAMT isn't done with the destruction.
By the time the presidential election cycle starts, there might not be much left of this country to argue over.
And I agree with a commentor upthread. They're floating all the RINOs first to see if they can fool some conservatives.
Posted by: Soona at February 05, 2014 10:30 AM (WLKl0)
Posted by: SFGoth at February 05, 2014 10:31 AM (nptiF)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at February 05, 2014 10:31 AM (iQxYV)
Where do they find these fucking idiots working from 5 year old talking points?
Fucking retards. (insert joke about sex with retarded people here)
Posted by: Dang at February 05, 2014 10:31 AM (MNq6o)
Posted by: Insomniac at February 05, 2014 10:31 AM (UAMVq)
I heard it too.
Does DMX realize Zimmerman's record is 1-0?
Posted by: EC at February 05, 2014 10:31 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Anon Y. Mous at February 05, 2014 10:31 AM (IN7k+)
Posted by: N.H. Primary Voter in 2012 at February 05, 2014 10:31 AM (Aif/5)
Posted by: MikeH at February 05, 2014 02:25 PM (cYaNh)
Nobody does a triple double dog dare!
Posted by: EC at February 05, 2014 02:28 PM (GQ8sn)
Yeah, that'll get you thrown in the barrel. The clearing barrel.
Posted by: tangonine at February 05, 2014 10:31 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 05, 2014 10:32 AM (tmzN0)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 05, 2014 10:32 AM (659DL)
Posted by: AD at February 05, 2014 10:32 AM (tgz/6)
Posted by: Golem_Master at February 05, 2014 10:32 AM (i6/+j)
Posted by: Insomniac at February 05, 2014 10:32 AM (UAMVq)
Posted by: Fritz at February 05, 2014 10:33 AM (UzPAd)
Nearly $18 trillion in debt.
Over $127 trillion in unfunded liabilities.
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at February 05, 2014 10:33 AM (BZAd3)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 10:33 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 05, 2014 10:33 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: shredded chi - cereal killer at February 05, 2014 10:33 AM (u8vcQ)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 05, 2014 10:34 AM (tmzN0)
Stopped reading immediately after those two words.
DO NOT WANT.
The Bush family are the ones who were handed the enormously valuable Reagan legacy and promptly flushed it down the toilet.
Bush The Lesser paved the way for the rise to power of Bill Clinton. The second Bush, Bush The Lesser Still, paved the way for the rise to power of Barack Obama.
Enough of that. No more.
Posted by: torquewrench at February 05, 2014 10:34 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 05, 2014 10:34 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at February 05, 2014 10:34 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Dynasty Scorekeeper at February 05, 2014 10:34 AM (F58x4)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humantiarian at February 05, 2014 10:34 AM (HVff2)
Posted by: CAC at February 05, 2014 02:32 PM (dMRye)
Hey, if we could get a young Princess Leia to run GOP, especially with the slave costume, she would cruise to victory!
Posted by: joncelli at February 05, 2014 10:34 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: zombie at February 05, 2014 10:34 AM (+cx5n)
Posted by: Karl Rove at February 05, 2014 10:35 AM (cYaNh)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 10:35 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: George P. Bush at February 05, 2014 10:35 AM (POpqt)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 05, 2014 10:35 AM (659DL)
Romney is not back to thinking anything. His position has always remained the same.
I disagree with his general statement on global warming but he has always indicated that he cannot say for sure whether global warming is man made or not but that any steps to reduce GW cannot be at the expense of the economy and that the USA should not be the focus when other countries are allowed to continue with no restrictions.
DrewM may in the future write the best post ever written on the blogosphere but I'll miss it because this is the last post of his I will read.
Posted by: polynikes at February 05, 2014 10:36 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: sock_rat_eez at February 05, 2014 10:36 AM (SwHqo)
Posted by: Y-not aka t-shirt at February 05, 2014 10:36 AM (zDsvJ)
Posted by: Jeb Bush at February 05, 2014 10:36 AM (ZPrif)
Yeah, I can see donating to the Jeb Bush campaign. NOT
Posted by: Misanthropic Humantiarian at February 05, 2014 02:34 PM (HVff2)
I just got out a Sharpie and wrote "LOL!" in 4 inch letters and mailed it back.
Posted by: tangonine at February 05, 2014 10:36 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 10:36 AM (PYAXX)
No more Kennedys.
No more Clintons.
No more Bushes.
Enough!
Posted by: Lizzy at February 05, 2014 02:29 PM (POpqt)
No shit! This says something about the state of our democracy and none of it is good.
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at February 05, 2014 10:36 AM (BZAd3)
Posted by: The Awkward-Turtle at February 05, 2014 10:37 AM (hcbCT)
Posted by: Karl Rove at February 05, 2014 10:37 AM (tmzN0)
Posted by: Brandon In Baton Rouge at February 05, 2014 10:37 AM (/Crba)
Posted by: garrett at February 05, 2014 10:37 AM (KsP9i)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at February 05, 2014 10:37 AM (DmNpO)
I'm almost old enough and I've got 'lost of experience, you know. Dad's got me preparing for this at his Global Initiative.
Posted by: Chelsea Clinton at February 05, 2014 10:37 AM (POpqt)
Posted by: zombie at February 05, 2014 10:37 AM (+cx5n)
Posted by: Duke at February 05, 2014 02:26 PM (d3clc)
---------------------------------------------
And JeffB and Hollowpoint said he was soooooo electable.
Posted by: Soona at February 05, 2014 10:38 AM (WLKl0)
Z-man wasn't doing too well during the actual fighting part of it.
But personally, I think Zimmerman and DMX (whoever the fuck that is) should go at it Monday Night Rehabilitation style.
How hard is it to conceal a Kel-tec PF-9 in a boxing glove?
When Zimmerman is getting knocked around again, he'll start having flashbacks and whip out "Trayvon's Bane".
Posted by: EC at February 05, 2014 10:38 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: shredded chi - cereal killer at February 05, 2014 10:38 AM (u8vcQ)
Posted by: Michael Moore at February 05, 2014 10:38 AM (UAMVq)
Posted by: Some Guy in Wisconsin at February 05, 2014 10:38 AM (B/3gr)
"Hey Conservatives! Are You Ready To Nominate One Of Your Own For President? Too Bad Because The Hottest New Establishment Darling Is....Jeb Bush.
Aaaaaaaaand get ready for POTUS Hillary!
The inevitable result if Jeb Bush is the Republican nominee.
Posted by: Marmo at February 05, 2014 10:39 AM (QW+AD)
Posted by: DangerGirl and her Sanity Prod (tm) at February 05, 2014 10:39 AM (LP0Fj)
Posted by: Plaxico Burress at February 05, 2014 10:39 AM (659DL)
Posted by: polynikes at February 05, 2014 02:36 PM (m2CN7)
Can't help but think how different things would be now had someone with character won the last election.
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at February 05, 2014 10:39 AM (BZAd3)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 05, 2014 10:39 AM (659DL)
Oh, that darn Mitt. Gosh darn, he would have made a heck of a president. We would have seen a "fix" of Obamacare, he would have put in a nice crippling cap and trade policy and had a really neat amnesty program already in place.
Posted by: Duke at February 05, 2014 02:26 PM (d3clc)
DrewM plays you guys like a fiddle.
Posted by: polynikes at February 05, 2014 10:40 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 05, 2014 10:40 AM (q5wSU)
Posted by: Hillary! at February 05, 2014 10:40 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at February 05, 2014 10:40 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 10:40 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: thunderb at February 05, 2014 10:40 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 05, 2014 10:40 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 10:40 AM (PYAXX)
Is that anything like "Food Insecurity"? It replaced hunger a few years ago. Apparently"1 in 5 children are food insecure" = they got 1 in 5 kids surveyed to claim they went to bed hungry **once** in the past year.
Not exactly starving in the streets.
Posted by: Lizzy at February 05, 2014 10:41 AM (POpqt)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 05, 2014 10:41 AM (tmzN0)
If the republican establishments goal is to lose gracefully in 2014 and 2016... then they are doing a hell of a job with all these fig leafs to the democrats when they are on the ropes with Obamacare.
What's the saying again.... politics ain't beanbag or some shit....
Sweep the leg! You c*cksucking pussy GOPers.
Posted by: Some Guy in Wisconsin at February 05, 2014 02:38 PM (B/3gr)
benghazi
IRS
Fast and furious
Obamacare
the commies have thrown about 20 interceptions in this game and the GOP keeps running into the wrong end zone.
These idiots could fuck up an anvil.
Posted by: tangonine at February 05, 2014 10:41 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at February 05, 2014 10:42 AM (BZAd3)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at February 05, 2014 10:42 AM (PYAXX)
David Struhs, who served six years as the Bush-appointed head of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, “....the Republican Party, can’t do, even if they’re intellectually capable of it.”
In a related story. David Struhs' mom.
Repeatedly.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 05, 2014 10:42 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: toby928© at February 05, 2014 10:42 AM (QupBk)
After Bush The Lesser eventually followed Reagan into the Oval Office, and was evicted from that office after only one term by a ridiculous horny hillbilly whose campaign centered on "it's the economy, stupid," I wanted to send Bush a voodoo doll of himself full of pins.
Thought better of it. You never know what the Secret Service may take amiss.
But the sentiment is surely there.
Posted by: torquewrench at February 05, 2014 10:42 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: 18-1 at February 05, 2014 10:43 AM (M3hAT)
Posted by: MikeH at February 05, 2014 10:43 AM (cYaNh)
Posted by: Conservatives for a Conservative Conservatism at February 05, 2014 10:43 AM (juDHN)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 05, 2014 10:43 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 05, 2014 02:40 PM (q5wSU)
Hope you weren't considering DrewMs guy, Newt Gingrich. Funny that DrewM would throw in a gratuitous shot at Romney when his chosen candidate was Gingrich.
Posted by: polynikes at February 05, 2014 10:43 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 05, 2014 10:44 AM (xorT2)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 10:44 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 05, 2014 10:45 AM (tmzN0)
Hope you weren't considering DrewMs guy, Newt Gingrich
-
No, I never supported Gingrich. Anyone (like him) who tells me that the conservative path is to make government work smarter (not smaller) is useless.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 05, 2014 10:45 AM (q5wSU)
Posted by: thunderb at February 05, 2014 10:45 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at February 05, 2014 10:46 AM (BZAd3)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 10:46 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: shredded chi - cereal killer at February 05, 2014 10:46 AM (u8vcQ)
Posted by: Countrysquire at February 05, 2014 10:46 AM (LSJmV)
Just once in my life I'd like to have the opportunity to vote for a GOP candidate who hits his Democratic opponent in the general election as hard, or harder, than he hit his Republican opponents in the primaries.
Instead, the last couple of cycles the Republicans have selected someone who goes medieval on the asses of other Republicans during the primaries, and then turns into an agreeable milquetoast when facing a Democrat in the general.
Posted by: torquewrench at February 05, 2014 10:47 AM (gqT4g)
And lookin' really old and fat, too.
There's a double standard and no amount of screaming "misogynist" or "unfair" changes the fact that Hills looks awful.
Posted by: Lizzy at February 05, 2014 10:47 AM (POpqt)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 05, 2014 10:47 AM (tmzN0)
Posted by: David Beckham at February 05, 2014 10:47 AM (ZPrif)
The last five years have been a boon to a fairly small group of people on both sides of the political spectrum. Trillions have seemingly evaporated with absolutely nothing to show for it for the country at large.
-
And ninety percent of them were bundlers. Each with payback in the seven figures for their donations.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 05, 2014 10:47 AM (q5wSU)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at February 05, 2014 10:47 AM (7ObY1)
DC is like this little society of criminals that blow each other continuously while providing absolutely nothing to anybody but themselves.
But don't you question Paul or John, they are as conservative as anybody out there.
Fo sho.
Posted by: Rev Dr E Buzz Christies at February 05, 2014 10:48 AM (xggaJ)
Posted by: EC at February 05, 2014 02:31 PM (GQ8sn)
Now I am picturing them both in the ring, DMX showing off his fancy footwork and mugging for the fans, and suddenly Zimmerman does an Indy Jones, pulls out a gun and shoots him. Thanks for making me laugh AND making me feel like a horrible person.
Posted by: LizLem at February 05, 2014 10:48 AM (BF+2f)
I'm no longer registered as a Republican. If they force Jeb through, I will no longer VOTE Republican. But hey, I'm not a big time donor, so fuck me, right?
Posted by: physics geek at February 05, 2014 10:48 AM (MT22W)
But they won't do that because of... women. We are SOL.
Posted by: Dang at February 05, 2014 10:48 AM (MNq6o)
Posted by: MikeH at February 05, 2014 02:43 PM (cYaNh)
Eff the discount. Go straight to giving money away.
Bet the Latinos will now forgive him for Bridgegate.
Posted by: Golfman in NC at February 05, 2014 10:48 AM (gHDMy)
Posted by: SL at February 05, 2014 10:50 AM (/RTvI)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at February 05, 2014 10:50 AM (8ZskC)
It is February 2014. The nomination is two years away. So it is time to panic.
Alright everyone...1...2...3!
AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!! *runs around in circles with hair on fire*
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Innuendoes for Both Men and Women at the Outrage Outlet! at February 05, 2014 10:50 AM (hLRSq)
This machine has a spill resistant keyboard. Otherwise I'd be sending you a demand to pay up for a replacement. As it is I have to go get more coffee. And blow my nose.
Posted by: torquewrench at February 05, 2014 10:50 AM (gqT4g)
tinyurl.com/l36vuxh
Posted by: Kinley Ardal
Probably full of trans fat.
Posted by: Dang at February 05, 2014 10:50 AM (MNq6o)
Posted by: Totes Conservative statagists in the GOP at February 05, 2014 10:50 AM (B/3gr)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 05, 2014 10:51 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 05, 2014 10:51 AM (NNjb2)
Posted by: Kermit T Frog at February 05, 2014 10:51 AM (aA2hG)
Off topic: something pleasant to look at. >.>
tinyurl.com/l36vuxh
-
Posted by: Kinley Ardal
Probably full of trans fat.
-
So, it is another Upton pic?
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 05, 2014 10:51 AM (q5wSU)
you'll probably be taxed on top of that.
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at February 05, 2014 10:52 AM (BZAd3)
Posted by: mugiwara at February 05, 2014 10:52 AM (3a584)
DrewM is messing with our heads, man.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at February 05, 2014 02:50 PM (8ZskC)
You think so? I don't. Nearly every post being on Republican Perfidy only proves exactly how dastardly and nefarious the evil powers of the RINO establishment actually are. How they plot our doom. I think it is excellent forewarning.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Innuendoes for Both Men and Women at the Outrage Outlet! at February 05, 2014 10:52 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at February 05, 2014 10:52 AM (r+7wo)
The Week "It's over. Jeb Bush will be the Gop Nominee."
http://tinyurl.com/n2uuq3q
If he can read a speech like Obama, I could vote for him.
We should be looking at his speech writers.
John McCain could read a pretty good speech. He had me cheering. Once.
Posted by: Justin Lately Jr at February 05, 2014 10:52 AM (nQE02)
Posted by: Daniel Simpson Day at February 05, 2014 10:52 AM (aA2hG)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at February 05, 2014 10:52 AM (DmNpO)
Wasn't Christie polling above Hillary a while back, and then -*boom* - scandal!
Posted by: Lizzy at February 05, 2014 10:53 AM (POpqt)
Posted by: RobM1981 at February 05, 2014 10:53 AM (zurJC)
This is a perfect example of how the republican elite think the rest of us are just too stupid; we don't know the difference between 'global' and 'America'.
Cause we're just dumb conservatives.
Posted by: SGT York at February 05, 2014 10:53 AM (FL9pc)
Posted by: LizLem at February 05, 2014 02:48 PM (BF+2f)
I didn't make #4 commentor for all of 2013 for nuthin!!!
Posted by: EC at February 05, 2014 10:53 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 05, 2014 10:53 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: alexthechick - Come to us, oh mighty SMOD at February 05, 2014 10:53 AM (VtjlW)
Remind me again which side the GOP-e is on?
Posted by: RoyalOil at February 05, 2014 10:53 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: Don't make me go Roundhead. at February 05, 2014 10:53 AM (P+fpB)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 05, 2014 10:54 AM (oFCZn)
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at February 05, 2014 10:54 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 05, 2014 10:54 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: @JohnTant at February 05, 2014 10:54 AM (PFy0L)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 05, 2014 02:53 PM (ZshNr)
Unobtanium?
Posted by: EC at February 05, 2014 10:54 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: dogfish at February 05, 2014 02:26 PM"
what he said: the Beltway RINOs have no incentive to win, and every reason to defend the status quo they profit from...
why would they want to upset a balance that personally benefits them?
Posted by: redc1c4 at February 05, 2014 10:55 AM (q+fqH)
Posted by: Jeb Bush at February 05, 2014 10:55 AM (F58x4)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 05, 2014 10:55 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Misanthropic Humantiarian at February 05, 2014 10:55 AM (HVff2)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at February 05, 2014 10:55 AM (r+7wo)
"But they won't do that because of... women."
I keep hearing that crap. The consultants always claim that women want "nice" candidates who are polite and meek and work towards compromise.
I also keep noticing in the dating world, women invariably say they want to date "nice" guys, yet at the end of the night, they quite frequently leave with the rude bad boy.
As a female friend observed, "Men waste a huge amount of time trying to figure out what women want. Meanwhile, women themselves don't know what they want."
Posted by: torquewrench at February 05, 2014 10:55 AM (gqT4g)
Uh, because there's no money in doing that.
Posted by: The Democrats at February 05, 2014 10:56 AM (POpqt)
Posted by: Soona at February 05, 2014 10:56 AM (WLKl0)
Show me the proof. I believe in climate change, because climate changes. Anthropogenic global warming because of man-made CO2, though? Show me the scientific proof.
Posted by: Marmo at February 05, 2014 10:56 AM (QW+AD)
Posted by: D-Lamp at February 05, 2014 10:56 AM (bb5+k)
Posted by: obligatory[/i][/b] at February 05, 2014 10:57 AM (5ikDv)
Beat that pole dance er poll.
My mind temporarily went into the gutter.
Half of it anyway.
Posted by: Tortuga at February 05, 2014 10:57 AM (FmyWU)
Posted by: flounder at February 05, 2014 10:57 AM (Kkt/i)
Ummmm........How to starve?
Posted by: LFW - Honorary Pointy Eared Vulcan at February 05, 2014 10:57 AM (F26eZ)
Posted by: Y-not aka t-shirt at February 05, 2014 10:57 AM (zDsvJ)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 05, 2014 10:57 AM (ZshNr)
Why the hell does everything environmental have to be oh noes we are destroying the whole world eleventy! A clean environment, by which I mean clean air and clean drinking water and lack of radiation unless I can turn into a super heroine in which case point me to the vat baby, is a good thing.
-
Amen. Set up some basic guidelines about damaging the environment, and sue the hell out of anyone who violates them. Prior restraint is too big and we can't afford it.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 05, 2014 10:57 AM (q5wSU)
Because there's no fucking way that'd be any more legitimate than any of Saddam Hussein's 99% reelections.
Posted by: grognard at February 05, 2014 10:58 AM (/29Nl)
How about having a real evaluation of the relative environmentally friendly nature of nukes v. wind v. solar v. natural gas v. oil?
How about, idefk, acting like grown ups? How about that, hmmm?
*carefully clambers down*
Posted by: alexthechick - Come to us, oh mighty SMOD at February 05, 2014 02:53 PM (VtjlW)
That is exactly Romney's position and when he says, GW is not only in America , he is referring to global economics and that any restrictions cannot just be focused on the United States.
Posted by: polynikes at February 05, 2014 10:58 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Don't make me go Roundhead. at February 05, 2014 10:58 AM (P+fpB)
And you're now a shoo-in for "Best Gratuitously Offensive But Funny Riff On A Great National Tragedy" Award for 2014.
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at February 05, 2014 10:58 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: kbdabear at February 05, 2014 10:59 AM (aTXUx)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 05, 2014 10:59 AM (659DL)
*scoops up various awards off the ground*
These will be worth something in the Burning Times!!!
Posted by: EC at February 05, 2014 10:59 AM (GQ8sn)
If yes, I'll be upstairs, cleaning my weapon and loading magazines.
Posted by: Washington Nearsider at February 05, 2014 10:59 AM (fwARV)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 05, 2014 10:59 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 11:01 AM (PYAXX)
They run this guy and it's clear they're absolutely trying to lose. Who is paying them to lose?
Soros?
Posted by: Infidel at February 05, 2014 11:01 AM (cojT9)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl 22 days until spring training at February 05, 2014 11:01 AM (u8GsB)
Posted by: grammie winger at February 05, 2014 11:01 AM (P6QsQ)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at February 05, 2014 02:54 PM (oFCZn)
--------------------------------------------------
That's easy. The democrats. It's all a scam inside the beltway. Everyone's getting rich beyond their wildest dreams. Why do we not have any evidence of "stimulus" spending outside of DC. We know now.
Posted by: Soona at February 05, 2014 11:01 AM (WLKl0)
Dr. Harrison Schmitt actually has gone to the Moon, and he'll tell anyone who listens that it's a huge reservoir of Helium-3, which if available in quantity makes getting commercial fusion power going on Earth a hell of a lot easier.
Collective response in America: ::yawn:: Who? Didn't we fake that landing on the moon stuff anyway? Pass the bong and the Cheetos, man.
Collective response in China: We're so there. ::frantic building sounds commence::
Posted by: torquewrench at February 05, 2014 11:02 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: eman at February 05, 2014 11:02 AM (4nNd6)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at February 05, 2014 11:02 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: Bigby's Knuckle Sandwich at February 05, 2014 11:03 AM (KgN8K)
Appeal to the squishy middle.
Amnesty.
This could work!
And I know just the candidate to pull this off...
Posted by: Karl Rove - from his underground bunker [/i][/b] at February 05, 2014 11:03 AM (5ikDv)
Seriously people, it's a short list. And you don't make the list.
Feel free to romance anybody you want, but when it's time to take your stroll down the aisle, it's going to be Jeb or Christie or heaven forbide, Huckleberry. I can't think of anyone else at the moment who will even be allowed to be considered.
Posted by: BurtTC at February 05, 2014 11:03 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at February 05, 2014 11:04 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at February 05, 2014 11:04 AM (naUcP)
Posted by: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus at February 05, 2014 11:04 AM (YYJjz)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 05, 2014 11:04 AM (659DL)
Posted by: garrett at February 05, 2014 11:05 AM (KOOGu)
Feel free to romance anybody you want, but when it's time to take your stroll down the aisle, it's going to be Jeb or Christie or heaven forbide, Huckleberry.
Pretty much.
Posted by: eleven at February 05, 2014 11:05 AM (fsLdt)
Posted by: Chuck Hagel at February 05, 2014 03:02 PM (Aif/5)
With that kind of money, I expect powered fucking armour and ED-209's (maybe) on patrol, orbital drop shock troops launched from space carriers, rail guns (never miss again!), and sharks with frickin' lasers on their heads.
Posted by: EC at February 05, 2014 11:05 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: alexthechick - Come to us, oh mighty SMOD at February 05, 2014 02:53 PM (VtjlW)
Now those are teh rants I come here for.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Innuendoes for Both Men and Women at the Outrage Outlet! at February 05, 2014 11:05 AM (hLRSq)
I'd vote for Jeb if he'd have a toke with me, but he won't. He's a Dewars man.
Posted by: Sphynx at February 05, 2014 11:05 AM (OZmbA)
Posted by: Bigby's Knuckle Sandwich at February 05, 2014 11:05 AM (KgN8K)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 05, 2014 11:05 AM (q5wSU)
Posted by: Y-not aka t-shirt at February 05, 2014 02:57 PM (zDsvJ)
The integrity of science was lost decades ago. Now it's just about grant money.
Posted by: tangonine at February 05, 2014 11:06 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at February 05, 2014 03:02 PM (r+7wo)
Sorry to see that you have been sucked into the vortex too.
Posted by: polynikes at February 05, 2014 11:06 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/b] [/s] at February 05, 2014 11:06 AM (HsTG8)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at February 05, 2014 11:07 AM (naUcP)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 11:07 AM (PYAXX)
People are worried that China will pose a serious threat to us in the next few years. If I were China, I'd make a big show about building up the military while just sitting back and watching the politicians in this country do their work for them.
Won't take long.
Posted by: LoneStarHeeb at February 05, 2014 11:07 AM (BZAd3)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 05, 2014 11:07 AM (659DL)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at February 05, 2014 11:08 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: Bigby's Knuckle Sandwich at February 05, 2014 11:08 AM (KgN8K)
Posted by: thunderb at February 05, 2014 11:09 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 11:09 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: rickb223 at February 05, 2014 11:09 AM (xorT2)
Posted by: AllenG
That.
Posted by: weft cut-loop[/i] [/b] at February 05, 2014 11:09 AM (cxs6V)
1 USA 582B
Makes you wonder where it's all going.
Unions.
Posted by: garrett at February 05, 2014 03:05 PM (KOOGu)
not to defense, that's certain.
Most of it is wasted by an acquisitions system run by unqualified people, unions, unaccountable FFRDCs, and multiple clown cars filled with people looking to get a job at LockMart when they retire.
Posted by: tangonine at February 05, 2014 11:09 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 11:10 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at February 05, 2014 11:10 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at February 05, 2014 11:10 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: elrobalo at February 05, 2014 11:10 AM (wH5Tk)
Posted by: garrett at February 05, 2014 11:10 AM (KOOGu)
Posted by: thunderb at February 05, 2014 11:10 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 05, 2014 11:11 AM (q5wSU)
Posted by: "mythical" GOP establishment - Second Place And Loving! [/i][/b] at February 05, 2014 11:11 AM (5ikDv)
Posted by: Cato at February 05, 2014 11:11 AM (i+Vw2)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at February 05, 2014 03:08 PM (r+7wo)
I know you are being sarcastic, but can I introduce you to the glacier outside my office window? It's name is Bjerg.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Innuendoes for Both Men and Women at the Outrage Outlet! at February 05, 2014 11:11 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 05, 2014 11:11 AM (659DL)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at February 05, 2014 11:11 AM (7ObY1)
If you want a real conservative nominee, cut the conspiracy theorizing and push forward a real conservative who's not
A) a hardcore so-con who lost a Senate election 8 years ago and for some reason hasn't gone away
B) a serial philanderer who's been out government for almost 20 years
C) an anti-semite, or
D) someone with a well-documented history of Foot-in-Mouth disease.
It's not hard.
Posted by: Paul at February 05, 2014 11:11 AM (9qDRl)
It is impossible for me to believe that they could find a bigger shlubby pussbag than Jeff Bush.
The GOP is awesome.
Posted by: Rev Dr E Buzz Christies at February 05, 2014 11:12 AM (xggaJ)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 05, 2014 11:12 AM (q5wSU)
They never learn...
Posted by: Brother Cavil
*uses sharp edges of awards to saw through net*
Posted by: EC at February 05, 2014 11:12 AM (GQ8sn)
As for the global warming nonsense, it used to be that scientists who started with a theory, then proceeded to try to force the data to conform to their theories were not, indeed, scientists.
We used to call them frauds, fanatics, sharlatans, snake oil salemen, or whatever. Now we give them Nobel prizes and whatnot.
The times, they are a burnin' (cue harmonica).
Posted by: BurtTC at February 05, 2014 11:12 AM (TOk1P)
Posted by: thunderb at February 05, 2014 03:10 PM (zOTsN)
Every time I read or hear the term "going green" I kill a kitten.
In a pile of burning tires.
Posted by: tangonine at February 05, 2014 11:12 AM (x3YFz)
Okay, that was a weird keyboard mangle in #318. Should have read "paradoxically on board with some toxic ideologies."
Posted by: Cato at February 05, 2014 11:13 AM (i+Vw2)
Posted by: Shoot Me at February 05, 2014 11:13 AM (qiXMt)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at February 05, 2014 11:13 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at February 05, 2014 11:13 AM (naUcP)
Posted by: Lincolntf at February 05, 2014 11:13 AM (ZshNr)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 11:14 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: t-bird at February 05, 2014 11:14 AM (FcR7P)
We are so boned.
Posted by: jakeman at February 05, 2014 11:14 AM (vH4YP)
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 05, 2014 03:05 PM (q5wSU)
----------------------------------------------
Good choices. Too bad they have to run against each other in the primaries. Seems as though that's where the conservative cause gets sidetracked and the RINO wins.
Posted by: Soona at February 05, 2014 11:14 AM (WLKl0)
Posted by: Brother Cavil at February 05, 2014 11:14 AM (naUcP)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 05, 2014 11:14 AM (659DL)
Happy kitty, sleepy kitty, burn burn burn.
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at February 05, 2014 03:13 PM (7ObY1)
^5 nicely done.
Posted by: tangonine at February 05, 2014 11:14 AM (x3YFz)
As for the global warming nonsense, it used to be that scientists who started with a theory, then proceeded to try to force the data to conform to their theories were not, indeed, scientists.
-
That was like the stone age of science, before they started voting on theories.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 05, 2014 11:14 AM (q5wSU)
Posted by: Countrysquire at February 05, 2014 11:15 AM (LSJmV)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at February 05, 2014 11:15 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at February 05, 2014 11:15 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Mainah at February 05, 2014 11:15 AM (659DL)
The good-faith effort of Common Core State Standards and now these Florida standards is the right path to be on.
It seems that Good Intentions Paving Specialists Inc. is booked solid for the next few years......
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 05, 2014 11:16 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: thunderb at February 05, 2014 03:14 PM (zOTsN)
Oh yeah, that one too, and "social justice" will ragestroke half the family.
Posted by: tangonine at February 05, 2014 11:16 AM (x3YFz)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 05, 2014 11:17 AM (kdfQ/)
I continue to like Cruz but continue to harbor suspicion and distrust in two areas.
-- Another (!) goddamned Ivy Leaguer. Even though the rest of the Ivy Mafia regard him as a filthy class traitor. The last non-Ivy president this country had was Ronald Reagan, and I'm more than ready to revive that model.
-- His wife works for the Vampire Squid, a.k.a. Goldman Sachs. I continue to believe that it would have been best for the country and the world if Goldman had been allowed to go totally bust in 2008, as they would have if left to their own devices. Not to mention that this opens up Cruz to the "Wall Street plutocrat" line of attack which worked well against Romney. (Romney was a LOT cleaner than Goldman Sachs, mind you.)
Posted by: torquewrench at February 05, 2014 11:17 AM (gqT4g)
Posted by: chique d'afrique (the artist formerly known as african chick) at February 05, 2014 11:17 AM (r+7wo)
Posted by: Circa (Insert Year Here) at February 05, 2014 03:11 PM (659DL)
-------------------------------------------------
He needs to stay in the senate. He'd make a great senate majority leader.
Posted by: Soona at February 05, 2014 11:17 AM (WLKl0)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at February 05, 2014 03:16 PM (TIIx5)
hearing "I'm on the highway to hell!" lyrics.
Posted by: tangonine at February 05, 2014 11:17 AM (x3YFz)
Environmental justice.
Social justice.
-
Does anyone remember what the definition of justice is? That one gets what one deserves, not that political connections determine the outcome.
Posted by: Vashta Nerada at February 05, 2014 11:17 AM (q5wSU)
_________
Now there's a candidate I can support. The "Chase the Dragon" campaign!
But Walter Becker is too stage-shy to be the veep. Who then?
Posted by: shredded chi - cereal killer at February 05, 2014 02:46 PM (u8vcQ)
**
Don't matter, I'm doing stream of conscience commenting. Whatever is on the radio at the moment I post a comment I will incorporate that musician into my comment. And it works well.....
VanMorrison 2016.
Point is...we're Doomed.
Posted by: dananjcon at February 05, 2014 11:18 AM (NpXoL)
A just a reminder Texas voters, you have the pleasure this year of voting against Jeb's son George P. in the Land Commissioner race.
Vote against him in the primary. vote against him in the general. Say bad things to his face if you meet him in the street.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 05, 2014 11:18 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Some Guy in Wisconsin at February 05, 2014 11:18 AM (B/3gr)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at February 05, 2014 11:18 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 05, 2014 11:19 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: thunderb at February 05, 2014 11:19 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 05, 2014 11:20 AM (dfYL9)
Posted by: BlueStateRebel at February 05, 2014 11:20 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 05, 2014 03:17 PM (kdfQ/)
And since it is February 2014 we really do not know who is going to run until next year. I admit it is fun speculating, and the panic does get the old blood flowing and the heart pumping, but it is a bit early to go full Tea Party.
I want to save that until I actually have targets.
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Innuendoes for Both Men and Women at the Outrage Outlet! at February 05, 2014 11:20 AM (hLRSq)
I hope that Ace hasn't been experimenting with that Phillip Seymour Hoffman heroin...
Posted by: Countrysquire
The negotiations for the sale to Salem Communications are at a delicate phase, so he's kinda busy right now.
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at February 05, 2014 11:20 AM (kdS6q)
Posted by: thunderb at February 05, 2014 03:19 PM (zOTsN)
In a world of perfect reason, he's right about businesses being able to serve who they please. In such a world, the market would destroy any business that did that, and rightfully so.
We don't live in that world.
Posted by: grognard at February 05, 2014 11:21 AM (/29Nl)
Get this, the instructions at no place calls out the installation of a cooling scoop on right hand side of the avionics spine. The part is P19 and you must drill out the locator hole on that half of the spine, the locator dimple can be seen on the inside of P25. And the scoop opening faces aft.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at February 05, 2014 11:21 AM (NNjb2)
Posted by: thunderb at February 05, 2014 11:22 AM (zOTsN)
Posted by: The MFM at February 05, 2014 11:22 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: Margarita DeVille at February 05, 2014 03:20 PM (dfYL9)
Lets see. Compassionate Consevatism slogan or Partial birth Abortion. Such a hard choice. Looks like I'm going to have to go with the PBA for the win.
Posted by: polynikes at February 05, 2014 11:22 AM (m2CN7)
He's a Nazi! There's the PROOF! A Nazi, I tell ya!
Posted by: The MFM at February 05, 2014 03:22 PM (7ObY1)
Well, ya, and he kills deer and eats them. Evil, evil guy.
Posted by: Sphynx at February 05, 2014 11:23 AM (OZmbA)
Posted by: Krebs v Carnot: Epic Battle of the Cycling Stars™ [/i] [/b] [/s] at February 05, 2014 11:23 AM (HsTG8)
There's no room to go criticizing candidates.
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at February 05, 2014 03:17 PM (kdfQ/)
I'm not saying the "establishment" candidates are any good (FTR I like Perry, Walker, Rand Paul, in that order).
I'm saying Romney and McCain before him won because they passed a basic competency test with primary voters. That test being, "does this guy seem mostly 'normal'?" A shadowy cabal in a smoke-filled room had very little to do with it.
Posted by: Paul at February 05, 2014 11:25 AM (9qDRl)
Dateline March 2017--President Ted Nugent today announced a national firearms competition to be held on the grounds of the Whitehouse shortly after the annual Easter egg roll. Bunnys will be heavily featured in target selection.
Posted by: Sphynx at February 05, 2014 11:25 AM (OZmbA)
Posted by: Chairman LMAO at February 05, 2014 11:26 AM (9eDbm)
>>>Posted by: Flatbush Joe at February 05, 2014 03:19 PM (ZPrif)
lol. You actually seem to think Obama's America will stand up to China if it invades the Senkakus. That's funny.
Posted by: Paul at February 05, 2014 11:27 AM (9qDRl)
Climatologists have done violence to the fields of meteorology, physics, mathematics, statistics, and computer science, just to get warmed up. In some ways it's the perfect leftist cause, because all of those fields tend to dispute postmodernism.
Posted by: Ian S. at February 05, 2014 11:28 AM (B/VB5)
Posted by: LFW - Honorary Pointy Eared Vulcan at February 05, 2014 11:30 AM (+hPIb)
Posted by: tmitsss at February 05, 2014 11:31 AM (7Rx8v)
Posted by: SL at February 05, 2014 11:38 AM (/RTvI)
Posted by: Chris Balsz at February 05, 2014 11:45 AM (5xmd7)
Posted by: rex batt at February 05, 2014 11:55 AM (9NHfs)
Posted by: I R A Darth Aggie © at February 05, 2014 12:04 PM (1hM1d)
Posted by: katya the designated driver at February 05, 2014 12:28 PM (4Chvm)
Posted by: Book at February 05, 2014 12:30 PM (qWES6)
Posted by: chuck at February 05, 2014 12:30 PM (hUPCS)
Posted by: Gregory of Yardale at February 05, 2014 12:36 PM (QXlbZ)
WHY do both parties have to run (or think they have to run) repeats? While I say this, and hope a new guy will run (like Ted Cruz or Trey Gowdy or anyone who will not take any crapola playing hands across the aisle), I will vote for anyone, anytime, anywhere against Dems.
It is also good news, the emerging potential new scandal of zipperless Bill and asking Tom Sizemore for his gf's phone number (who he flew, supposedly, to WH for four blissful days, probably trying out the Lincoln bedroom and all bedrooms in WH). Supposedly he told Sizemore he and Cankles had an open marriage and yada. Whatever, I enjoy his scandals.
Posted by: ChristyBlinky survived 2014 Polar Vortex at February 05, 2014 12:37 PM (baL2B)
"WHY do both parties have to run (or think they have to run) repeats?"
Give the Dems some credit for breaking with the script and going for the new guy in '08. We're all suffering in hell now, but you can't say it didn't work for them.
Did the GOP learn anything from that? No, the GOP never does.
Posted by: Donna V at February 05, 2014 12:48 PM (u0lmX)
lol Bush is a worse choice than Romney OR McCain, and yet another sign of the party establishment's corruption.
Posted by: Born Free at February 05, 2014 12:56 PM (xL8Hf)
Posted by: rex batt at February 05, 2014 01:16 PM (9NHfs)
Posted by: rex batt at February 05, 2014 01:18 PM (9NHfs)
Posted by: TexasJew at February 05, 2014 01:33 PM (qK2iX)
We know the party isn't going to nominate someone all in for amnesty AND Common Core. And it's not likely we'll go for Jeb, still too soon and even his Mom doesn't think he should run because of the family thing.
We are still ten freaking months from the MIDTERM election, folks. Save some freaking-out for later when it may be needed, mmmkay?
Posted by: Adjoran at February 05, 2014 01:57 PM (QIQ6j)
Posted by: Optimizer at February 05, 2014 02:08 PM (saDM3)
Posted by: Optimizer at February 05, 2014 02:13 PM (saDM3)
Posted by: Y-not aka t-shirt at February 05, 2014 02:21 PM (zDsvJ)
Also, Mittens is an idiot. Hope he GOES. AWAY. Shuddup already!
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at February 05, 2014 02:23 PM (KL49F)
No.. Forkin...Way...In...Hell.
Republicans are the absolute kings of dunbass if they push this RINO off on us.
Posted by: Gotta B Kidenme at February 05, 2014 02:25 PM (KEy1O)
Posted by: Chris Balsz at February 05, 2014 02:28 PM (5xmd7)
Posted by: Veritas at February 05, 2014 02:35 PM (w9drt)
Posted by: burt at February 05, 2014 02:39 PM (1+kJ5)
Posted by: Chris Balsz at February 05, 2014 02:52 PM (5xmd7)
Posted by: toby928© at February 05, 2014 03:31 PM (QupBk)
Posted by: PersonFromPorlock at February 05, 2014 04:23 PM (lILC0)
It is waaaay too early for this. If the media want to vent their spleen on Jeb, then let them. I don't care. Bottom line: I will vote against the Democrat. Every time. And those of you who stayed home in 2008 or 2012 are the reason we have a jug-eared jackass in the WH and his "signature legislation" of Obamacare ruining our economy until the rest of most of our lives (or, so says the CBO guy today). While your reasons for staying home and allowing the Dems to win were justified, due to your high standards, which I agree with, by the way. However, unlike the blind Dems who voted for a black person to be president, as, unprecedented and historical! Part of history! Or the ignorant lambs led to slaughter for a beer or a pack of cigs or foodstamps, told to vote next to the (D). Or the people rigging the polls and finding trunks of votes, or throwing away the military absentee votes....you are educated, smart, conservative but plain stupid when it comes to moral high ground trumping reality: which was without you the Dems would win. This proved right in 2008, and, I think, in 2012 when, omg, we can't vote for a MORMON!!!11!
So, from comments today, I see the beginning of the circular firing squad forming again, full of high dudgeon and flip out. Let's see: vote GOP and maybe, by a freaking miracle, take back the Senate, and repeal Obamacare. Or, flounce! Moral high ground. Or, in 2016, let's say the ticket is Romney (who says he is not running, so there's that) or Ryan or Rubio. Ok. They are trying to pass an immigration bill. Their statements, some taken out of context, are that security does not matter and blah, blah, or they have to do this first. Ok. This is an issue I do not like: more added to welfare rolls, etc. But this bs of paying for their crap anyway, to the tune of, uh, over $7 to $9 thousand dollars per tax paying household in Floriduh (I haven't looked lately, could be more), well, fellas, that ain't working either. Speaking of my corner, many illegals are not here anymore because the economy is so bad they deported themselves back to Mexico...but I digress. I am going to listen to what these guys say and try to figure out their reasoning, as I think Rubio and Ryan are pretty smart guys. Yeah, politicians...but let's try something new and listen to what whoever says is running vs having it being read to us by Rush who is just reading the Drudge headlines (and I like both Rush and Drudge).
The choice will be clear again: stay home and let this raft keep heading for the rapids, or vote against the Dems, who sure as hell don't have your backs. If a third party is to be birthed, you better get busy, as, right now, I see no alternative but to vote or keep rolling over and playing dead. Oh, and I will go to my grave believing Romney/Ryan won but there was lots and lots of illegal doings going on including hacking in some states. But, crap, let's try to get it right this time and do what our parents and grandparents did when a Republican won the primary (do you think for one red hot minute my parents adored Nixon? Or Goldwater? Or anyone other than General Eisenhower? I mean, please). Unfortunately, with the Internet, our lives are, like Baroque's, in continuous campaign mode.
#politicsmakesmebitchy
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Duchess of Something at February 05, 2014 05:18 PM (baL2B)
There is a tremendous amount wrong with your entire comment. But, I'll just say that I am tired of GOP apologists who seem to believe that the entire purpose of conservatism is to elect republicans. that we are playing a team sport and the only goal is to help the "r" team win and defeat the "d" team.
People who think like that are as much, if not more, of the problem for the U.S. than the dems. Because it empowers the GOP to be as liberal as it wants, knowing that "conservatives" who think simply electing an "r" is the solution, when the republicans are really as much of the problem as the dems.
Let's see: vote GOP and maybe, by a freaking miracle, take back the Senate, and repeal Obamacare.
Talk about not paying attention. Both McConnell and Boehner have stated publicly that they have no intention of repealing Obamacare - only "fixing" it. This is what I mean by beliving that voting "r" solves everything.
but I digress. I am going to listen to what these guys say and try to figure out their reasoning, as I think Rubio and Ryan are pretty smart guys. Yeah, politicians...but let's try something new and listen to what whoever says is running vs having it being read to us by Rush who is just reading the Drudge headlines (and I like both Rush and Drudge).
So, your argument is listen to whatever they tell you during a campaign and do not - under any circumstances - listen to things they've said in the past or done in the past (or things they are telling people in private)? Yeah. Brilliant strategy.
I hate to break it to you, but every politician (even the dems) run to the right during the election (and particularly during the GOP primary). None of them ever actually do anything they promise during the campaign. For instance, no republican ran on passing amnesty. Yet, that is what they are going to do. No republican ran on increasing spending. Yet they did that. So, your argument here - listen to what they say during a campaign and ignore everything else - is absurd.
The choice will be clear again: stay home and let this raft keep heading for the rapids, or vote against the Dems, who sure as hell don't have your backs
Vapid at best. Vote for the GOP to increase spending, increase gov't, increase entitlements, and pass amnesty or else what? The dems will do all those things?
I'm pretty tired of GOP apologists who think they are smart explaining why we have to vote "R" or else we'll get "D". Ohhhh, scary! If we don't elect the "r" we'll end up with more gov't. Newsflash - the R's also increase the size, scope and expense of gov't.
I'm sick of the moral high ground of the unprincipled republican apologists telling us that our lives depend on voting for republicans no matter what they do or say. And then complaining that we have other ideas and complaining that we are "truecons" or "outrageously outraged" or "self righteous" or whatever nonsense.
the reality is you are just as self-righteous about your "principles", the only difference is that your principles are different. Your principles are "elect republicans no matter what". That is what you are self-righteous about. That is where your high moral dudgeon kicks in. You are better than us because you will pull that "r" lever no matter what!!! That makes you smarter, better, and more righteous in your mind.
We don't owe our votes to the GOP. The GOP is not entitled to our votes. The GOP and any candidate it runs must earn our votes. The GOP as a whole has done everything in its power over the last 20 years to try and get conservatives to stop voting for the GOP. So, it shouldn't really surprise the GOP or the GOP's die-hard supporters that conservatives are extremely leery of voting for the GOP.
Actions speak much louder than words and the GOP's actions prove that the GOP is a left of center party that disdains conservatives and conservatism.
I note that nowhere in your rant do you give a reason to vote for the GOP. You merely bitch and complain that if we don't vote for the GOP the Dems will win.
typical.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at February 06, 2014 03:49 AM (sOx93)
And where, kind sir, do you offer a solution? You may consider me vapid and bitchy, and if you think for one nanosecond a monkey toe's opinion behind his keyboard bothers me, well, whatever.
Where is your solution? I will vote for a miracle conservative, who manages to unite the party, in a freaking heartbeat. I consider myself a conservative, but in the weird world we live in, where the odds seem to be against us with demographics and liberal media bias, I am a "realist conservative" who is willing to not only roll with the punches but knock down Dems at the same time.
While there is political speak to "fix" Obamacare, from what I have read (and I admit, since 2012, I am both disinterested in politics, as there is a life off the keyboards and calling Congress; as well as disillusioned, with both sides of this argument: conservatives vs Rino. My point is this: division only strengthens the Dems and they are thankful for this process, brought on by purists and the liberal media. It makes their liberal messaging easier. Do you think if,maybe, Rush (who I respect) had supported Romney earlier he would have won? I think it would have helped, if, right out of the primary process, there was uniting instead of whining to beat this stupid preznit we have. So, you see, you are fighting against your own (me) who does not agree with you. That is exactly what the Dems want. 'gradulations, as Corinne Brown would say!
Therefore I have decided to support anyone against Democrats, without all of the hoopla and character assassinations (unless warranted, of course, like a Weiner or other perverts and weirdos). I have thrown rotten tomatoes at Huckabee in the past. No more. The alternative: a Dem, is far worse.
So put that in your pipe and smoke it. If you want a purist conservative, find him and let's roll. If you want to stay home, stay home. Jimmy cracked corn, and I don't care.
But since you are so busy taking each bit of my comment to pieces, let's see your solution! xoxo
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Duchess of Something at February 06, 2014 06:00 AM (baL2B)
More stupid. If we just shut up and support whoever you tell us to we'll beat the dems!!!! Hooray!!! And then what?
I love how you want to argue we should have "supported Romney earlier". what? What does that mean? Should we even have primaries? Why? Shouldn't we just wait and see who the GOP tells us to vote for and then do so? Silly.
Your response to me is more of the same. "Shut up and support the GOP no matter what becasue I am a realist who says so!!!!"
What is my solution? fight for conservative principals and goals. That does not = mindlessly supporting the GOP as you suggest. Not even close. Not even remotely close.
So put that in your pipe and smoke it. If you want a purist conservative, find him and let's roll. If you want to stay home, stay home. Jimmy cracked corn, and I don't care.
Obviously, you do care or you wouldn't have responded with more vapidity. I never said "purist conservative" - those are your words. those are teh words of the "shut up and support the GOP no matter what" brigade. If we don't just kneel and worship at the GOP altar whey you command, we are "purists" or "right-wing crazies" or a "circular firing squad".
Your solution is obvious - "shut up and support the GOP". That's a poor solution and not remotely conservative. That is a big-gov't solution. the GOP is not a conservative party and does not pursue conservative goals. So your blind allegiance to the GOP is not well thought out.
I consider myself a conservative, but in the weird world we live in, where the odds seem to be against us with demographics and liberal media bias, I am a "realist conservative" who is willing to not only roll with the punches but knock down Dems at the same time.
In other words - not a conservative. You've already given up. You are willing to take whatever the GOP gives you to "beat the dems". That is exactly what I said was the problem and you admit it and continue to claim that is somehow a good thing?
Sad.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at February 06, 2014 06:21 AM (sOx93)
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Duchess of Something at February 06, 2014 10:00 AM (baL2B)
And, I'm responding to your comment because it so cleanly encapsulates the thinking of a large number of commenters on this site - that we should just all shut up and support the GOP no matter what.
Conservatism does not equal the GOP and the GOP does not equal conservatism. That is my point. Everyone who argues for blind loyalty to the GOP is not conservative - they are republicans. They have tribal loyalty to the "R" brand, not loyalty to any conservative principals. That is the problem.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at February 06, 2014 06:27 AM (sOx93)
conservative, find him and let's roll. If you want to stay home, stay
home. Jimmy cracked corn, and I don't care.
the other reason this isn't true is that you posted your original comment complaining (yes whining) that conservatives don't shut up and vote "r". That was the whole point of your original comment. If you didn't care about conservatives who don't blindly follow the GOP, you wouldn't have felt the need to comment on how we should just shut up and blindly follow the GOP.
this is a type of comment we repeatedly see. The "why don't you all just shut up and support the GOP no matter what or else the dems will win" comment. It's as if some people don't understand the difference between conservatism and the GOP - they are not the same thing.
Posted by: Monkeytoe at February 06, 2014 06:36 AM (sOx93)
This is a stale argument for many years now. I "got" it in 2008. I supported it then and do hope for a pendulum swing of conservatism.
I do not tell people to shut up, by the way. Those are your words. What people do is their bidness. Find where I said shut up: yep, you can't. I am simply making a statement, jumped on by you as we see differently and you are getting all defensive and appear, to me, to be the only one whining.
I think it is bad enough when Dems and people who vote GOP are in a room and the topic of either Dear Leader or Romney comes up. There is no middle ground...none. Totally polarized opinions based on content learned from the media. Rarely are opinions based on their own reading and making decisions for themselves (and this is in families today who vote opposite of each other. Obama has done one thing: he has polarized this nation).Very rare are the reasonable people who now see Obama's failures and things Romney predicted...and other GOP Congresscritters predicted, in the failure of Obamacare and the impact on the economy. Romney would have been a much better president than the one we have. He, at least, knows how to successfully run a business, is smart, and wants to fix this country. Baroque not so much, as he mostly appreciates his free ride on Air Force One and the chance to swag a little or sit at his empty big boy desk. There was a choice to make in 2012 and this is the choice we got: a pretender vs someone who wanted to make a difference and correct the ride off the cliff.
That said, it is such a pity that I FREAKING AGREE with you as a conservative, and I am one, dude. But there is no path to victory with purists vs the Rino label you throw at anyone who does not agree with you.
My glass is always half full. I adjust to change. And, apparently, from the last two elections, this is how it may be: a candidate with conservative values, but, to gain votes, has to compromise on some issues (one issue I will not compromise is my pro-life stance and the entire mess Obamacare has added to that of us all now paying for free abortions and birth control). Other issues I can...sometimes..compromise on. It is like a marriage, I guess, or a relationship with children: they are not always going to agree with you.
I am going to hopefully be very surprised in 2016, with the abject failure and chaos of obamacare creating conservatives from Dems like water to fine wine. I think the elections this fall will, hopefully, start the pendulum swing back to conservative principles, if it is not too late after 2008 and 2012, where Dems waltzed in and took over. Should we win all of Congress, maybe there is hope for repeal or "fixing" the law as it stands. That would give me a lot of hope.
I have no idea who you are nor do I care. Seriously. Whatever, dude. Nor do you have a bit of knowledge, apparently, on being a conservative realist, and that is what I am and have evolved into since 2008. xoxo
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Duchess of Something at February 06, 2014 07:26 AM (baL2B)
Posted by: Veritas at February 06, 2014 12:39 PM (w9drt)
Posted by: ChristyBlinky, Duchess of Something at February 05, 2014 09:18 PM (baL2B)
Posted by: Monkeytoe at February 06, 2014 07:49 AM (sOx93)
===> are EXCELLENT rants.
= = = = = = = = = = =
They are BOTH *ABSOLUTELY* true.
The rest of us need to print them out and laminate them ... then think long and hard and seriously about how to reconcile them in our own minds.
Thank God the next Presidential elections are a good long way off.
Thank you both.
Posted by: A_Nonny_Mouse at February 07, 2014 02:56 PM (Zy2tG)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2825 seconds, 556 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: EC at February 05, 2014 10:20 AM (GQ8sn)