April 13, 2014
— Open Blogger

(The interior of Rizzoli bookstore on West 57th Street in Manhattan. Credit Chester Higgins Jr./The New York Times )
Good morning morons and moronettes and welcome to AoSHQ's prestigious Sunday Morning Book Thread.
Blue City Blues
Manhattan used to have a ton of bookstores, but now they're disappearing:
Rising rents in Manhattan have forced out many retailers, from pizza joints to flower shops. But the rapidly escalating cost of doing business there is also driving out bookstores, threatening the cityÂ’s sense of self as the center of the literary universe, the home of the publishing industry and a place that lures and nurtures authors and avid readers.
And rents in Manhattan are like nowhere else:
“They were unsustainable,” Ms. McNally said. “Small spaces for $40,000 or more each month. It was so disheartening.”
I remember Rush Limbaugh complaining about this years ago when he lived in an apartment in New Yord City. He said, you just have to adjust your thinking to understand the rent situation in NYC. And back then, it was only $10,000 per month.
Naturally, an exquisitely liberal publication like the New York Times isn't going to mention this, but New York City is one of the most rent-controlled cities in the world, where building owners are saddled with a bewildering array of housing regulations and rules about what kind of rents they may or may not charge their tenants. The idea that these burdensome housing regulations may be a factor behind the high rents simply does not enter into their minds.
Years ago, as one of my first purchases through the 'Conservative Book Club' (remember that?), I picked up Excluded Americans: Homelessness and Housing Policies by William Tucker, who presented a large amount statistical evidence to prove a correlation between high rates of homelessness and rent control. Along the way, he spent a lot of time talking about NYC rent control and I was surprised to learn that Manhattan, now the home of $40,000/month rents, used to have so much housing that they practically had to give it away. Rents were affordable by practically everybody. Then they imposed rent control during WWII as a "temporary war-time measure" and that introduced distortions in the housing market that have become permanent. And nobody wants to repeal any of these regulations because too many politicians and legislators have used their positions of influence secured sweet, sweet deals for themselves (like a nice, upstairs apartment for $237.50 per month) and so there's no way they're going to want to change anything.
So the closings continue:
Independents like Coliseum Books, Shakespeare and Company on the Upper West Side, Endicott Booksellers and Murder Ink have all closed their doors.
And it's not just the little guys:
But now the chain stores are shutting down, too. Since 2007, five Barnes & Noble stores throughout Manhattan have closed, including its former flagship store on Fifth Avenue and 18th Street, which was shuttered in January. Five Borders stores in Manhattan were closed in 2011 when the chain went bankrupt, vacating huge spaces on Park Avenue, near Penn Station and in the Shops at Columbus Circle.
I'm tempted to jeer at the wealthy Manhattan liberals who have brought this turn of events upon themselves. Still, I hate to see all these bookstores closing their doors, and I hope that somehow, the trend can be reversed.
PS- Rush also mentioned that he couldn't get a garbage disposal installed in his kitchen because of the contract the building had with the garbage-collectors' union.
The Boss Always Finds The Good Stuff First
On Friday, ace posted a link to these two sentence horror stories. Some of them are deliciously creepy. I'm trying to think of one myself, but only could come up with this, inspired by Lovecraft, and it's kind of lame:
As I was gazing at the old photo of my grandfather, I happened to think of those poor people over on the coast in Innsmouth who gradually turned into groteseque fish creatures as they got older. Wait, is that a gill behind his ear?
And here's one for AtC and MWR:
Last night I had this horrible dream of feeling a bunch of huge, hairy spiders crawling all over me. I woke up choking and had to pull a large wad of silk threads and an egg sac the size of a golf ball out of my mouth.

Nostalgia
Those of you who were fans of the old National Lampoon mag, as I was in the days of my misspent yoot, should probably check out Mark's Very Large National Lampoon Site. The site is no longer being updated, but there's a ton of stuff there. The magazine itself, issue by issue, is of uneven quality, but I really like some of their ancillary publications, such as National Lampoon 1964 High School Yearbook parody by P.J. O'Rourke. Also National Lampoon's Truly Tasteless Cartoons: The Best of the Worst (see above).
Of course, you can get the National Lampoon Magazine All 246 Issues Plus 36 Radio Show Episodes and Cover Art Gallery 2 Disc Set Rare New Find for the low, low price of $9.95.
...and Speaking of Comics
The ONT may have mentioned this already, but if not, let me be the first:
Archie Andrews will die this summer.
According to the publisher, Archie will “sacrifice himself heroically while saving the life of a friend.” The “Life with Archie” series detailed what happened to the main character after he finished college. However, “Life” has followed two different timelines, one showing what Archie’s life would be like if he pursued a relationship with paramour Betty and the other following his life if he chose Veronica.
“The final issue, however, will show readers Archie's final fate in both timelines – and they're the same,” Archie Comics CEO Jon Goldwater told CNN.
More on this earth-shattering turn of events here.
Historical Note
So a couple of days ago, I stumbled upon When The Wicked Seize A City, and as it happens, it is the very first ebook I ever read on teh internets, which would have been around 1998 or 1999. It costs $3.99 now, but back then, I could read it for free. The book is a recounting of events that happened in the late 80s/early 90s that, strangely enough, are still relevant today:
1. Group starts Presbyterian church in San Francisco
2. Short on music help, said church hires guy to play the piano
3. Guy turns out to be gay
4. Church fires gay guy
5. Hilarity ensues
6. And by "hilarity", I mean harassing/obscene phone calls to the church and pastor's private phone at all hours, lawsuits, verbal abuse, death threats, vandalism, and street protests, including property damage with the San Francisco police standing around like potted plants.
These days all of this stuff is pretty much old hat, but back then, it was sort of unprecedented.
The church got zero help from local civic authorities, and precious little from its own denomination (OPC). And they stuck to their guns. What that small church had to endure was truly frightening. Don't know if they would be able to get away with something like that today, though.
A Print Version of Wikipedia?
So how much material is on Wikipedia? C'mon, guess. Actually, it's about 2.6 billion words. And now they're trying to raise the funds to come out with a print version:
Conceived by the team who work on the open source book tool for Wikipedia at publisher PediaPress, the Indiegogo fundraiser is looking to raise $50,000 (£30,000) to bring Wikipedia into print...It would run to over a million pages, featuring more than four million articles by 20 million volunteers: an "record-breaking" new project to turn Wikipedia into 1,000 books has just launched on Indiegogo.
So how big would something like this be?
The team, PediaPress's Heiko Hees, Christoph Kepper and Alex Boerger, believe the complete English Wikipedia would fit into approximately 1,000 books, with 1,200 pages each. "All volumes will have continuous page numbers, so the last article could as well be on page number 1,193,014," they say. The text, which will include images, will be laid out in three columns across 600,000-odd sheets of paper, which will be "FSC-certified paper that comes from sustainable forestry", they said...They envisage the books fitting on a 10m-long book case, which they would hope to display at the Wikimania conference in London this August.
Of course, given how Wikipedia works, the print version would be outdated practically instantaneously.
What I'm Reading
So I'm still reading Stephen Ambrose's Nixon biography, and I just got to the part about his first congressional race in 1946, against the entrenched Democrat Jerry Voorhis. The wikipedia description of Nixon's successful campaign is surprisingly bland:
[Nixon] contended that Voorhis had been ineffective as a congressman and suggested that Voorhis's endorsement by a group linked to communists meant that Voorhis must have radical views.[48] Nixon won the election, receiving 65,586 votes to Voorhis' 49,994.[49]
In fact, it was a ridiculously dirty campaign. Ambrose, a sympathetic biographer, nevertheless sums it up by saying that
his campaign as a whole was characterized by a vicious, snarling approach that was full of half-truths, full lies, and innuendos, hurled at such a pace that Voorhis could never catch up with them. Nixon had promised a “rocking, socking campaign,” but what he gave the people of the 12th District was a dirty one.
But then later on, he denied the whole thing entirely:
In 1955, Nixon told a reporter that “Communism was not the issue at any time in the ‘46 campaign. Few people knew about Communism then, and even fewer cared.” That was a breathtaking assertion, reckless in its disregard of the truth, outrageous in its denial of the facts, as was Nixon’s further claim that he had never implied that Voorhis was a Communist or raised the issue of Communism in the campaign.
The truth? Nixon admitted
“Of course I knew Jerry Voorhis wasn’t a Communist.”...But it’s a good political campaign fire to use. I had to win. That’s the thing you don’t understand. The important thing is to win. You’re just being naive.”
So it's OK to do whatever you have to do to win? A more succinct declaration of absolute amorality would be hard to come by. This is the Nixon everyone knows and hates. How he went from being a nice Quaker boy to a ruthless politician is something that no one, to my knowledge, has ever explained. There is no evidence, in anything he ever said or wrote, that he was conscious of any change from the one to the other. So it's hard not to conclude that that's just who he always was.
I started out being impressed by Nixon, now I'm kind of disappointed.
Easter Bleg
So, this is for all of you Christians, I would like to know your thoughts on what are good theological/devotional writings appropriate for Easter, and if I get enough responses, I'll compile a list for the Easter Sunday book thread.
___________
So that's all for this week. As always, book thread tips, suggestions, rumors, threats, and insults may be sent to OregonMuse, Proprietor, AoSHQ Book Thread, at aoshqbookthread, followed by the 'at' sign, and then 'G' mail, and then dot cee oh emm.
What have you all been reading this week?
Posted by: Open Blogger at
05:55 AM
| Comments (238)
Post contains 1906 words, total size 14 kb.
Posted by: berserker lurker at April 13, 2014 06:05 AM (wrlzk)
Posted by: Y-not at April 13, 2014 06:07 AM (zDsvJ)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 06:07 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at April 13, 2014 06:07 AM (T2V/1)
I suspect stores like that will go the way of the dodo soon.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at April 13, 2014 06:08 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 06:09 AM (zpNwC)
Direct result of commie rent control and building codes..
Posted by: Vic[/i] at April 13, 2014 06:10 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Nip Sip at April 13, 2014 06:11 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: Rowan Atkinson at April 13, 2014 06:12 AM (8c12T)
Posted by: Nip Sip at April 13, 2014 06:12 AM (0FSuD)
I've just finished "The Orphan Master's Son," by Adam Johnson.. It's brilliant. No wonder it won the Pulitzer for fiction last year.
It's a novel of, by & about North Korea. If Johnson is a liberal (I assume so), he hides it well in THIS novel. I'm stunned the Volvo lattte set would give their big prize to anything so... condemnatory of a communist regime.
Posted by: mnw at April 13, 2014 06:13 AM (MipG2)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 06:13 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: SnowyBits at April 13, 2014 06:14 AM (NqhG2)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 06:14 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: alexthechick - Oh save us mighty SMOD at April 13, 2014 06:16 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Rowan Atkinson at April 13, 2014 10:12 AM (8c12T)
Rent control and other regulations caused fewer apartments to be built. That in turn drove up the prices of the apartment that were no covered by rent control. When someone moves out of a rent control apartment they go off of rent control so nobody ever moves out until the body wagon totes them away.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at April 13, 2014 06:16 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: RWC at April 13, 2014 06:17 AM (QeH9j)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 06:18 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: J.J. Sefton at April 13, 2014 06:18 AM (CMkNk)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) [/b] [/i] [/s] at April 13, 2014 06:19 AM (HDwDg)
Posted by: eman at April 13, 2014 06:21 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: Nip Sip at April 13, 2014 06:21 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: doug at April 13, 2014 06:22 AM (O4p89)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 06:22 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: All Hail Eris at April 13, 2014 06:22 AM (QBm1P)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) [/b] [/i] [/s] at April 13, 2014 06:23 AM (HDwDg)
Posted by: waelse1 at April 13, 2014 06:23 AM (VrAbp)
Posted by: Strange Bedfellow at April 13, 2014 06:23 AM (QCc6B)
Posted by: Nip Sip at April 13, 2014 06:24 AM (0FSuD)
Posted by: doug at April 13, 2014 06:24 AM (O4p89)
Posted by: SnowyBits at April 13, 2014 06:25 AM (NqhG2)
In "Red Fortress" the book is up to the time of Peter the Great who relocated a lot of operatrions to Saint Petersburg, perhaps in reaction to not wanting to stay in a setting where so many of his family was trashed.
Since Gibbon is to the point of the Crusades, I've decided to scrutinize the events more closely with other books, including a mid 60s book by Zoe Oldenbourg which I already had and one on the first Crusade which a fellow moron helpfully suggested last weekend which looks very good.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 13, 2014 06:26 AM (yT+eY)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) [/b] [/i] [/s] at April 13, 2014 06:26 AM (HDwDg)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 06:28 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) [/b] [/i] [/s] at April 13, 2014 06:29 AM (HDwDg)
Posted by: Strange Bedfellow at April 13, 2014 10:23 AM (QCc6B)
SF has always had insane rent prices. Even when I was out there in the early 70s. The entire Bay Area finally exploded in a huge real estate bubble which subsequently burst. I have friends out there still and they left years ago and moved to a town up near the NV border.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at April 13, 2014 06:30 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Vic at April 13, 2014 10:16 AM (T2V/1)
It's worse than that.
Grandma puts grandson on lease, so when she dies he gets the apartment, with rent control intact. All he has to do is pretend to live there until the old biddy kicks the bucket.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 13, 2014 06:30 AM (QFxY5)
Anyone who saw a tenement (I grew up in one, still live in one) has seen a shaftway. Shaftways were mandated by city law to make sure the residents could get some air and light. At the time, landlords and builders whined that those changes would cost jobs, put them in the poorhouse, and make it impossible for anyone to build in NYC. Hah.
The housing situation in NYC is unlike anywhere else because of the demand, not the supply. After 9/11, renters left the Battery in droves, so the feds gave cash to the renters to stay. And the landlords raised rents enough to take the incentives. I have seen and experienced firsthand how landlords and developers use illegal and strongarm tactics to drive out longtime tenants. (I've had a knife held to my throat in the hallway.) We're not dealing with Ghandis. They buy buildings knowing there are rent controlled and rent stabilized tenants. And the $250 rent controlled aparment is pretty much a myth. Now folks with rent controlled leases have their rent increased by law.
Posted by: vivi at April 13, 2014 06:30 AM (+/8mE)
Posted by: Bob wets his pants at April 13, 2014 06:31 AM (2w+1/)
Posted by: eman at April 13, 2014 06:31 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 13, 2014 06:31 AM (Mogjf)
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 13, 2014 10:30 AM (QFxY5)
LOL, I didn't know they could legally do that, but then again Charlie Rangal with 3 rent control apartments was also illegal.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at April 13, 2014 06:32 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Fox2! at April 13, 2014 06:32 AM (cHwSy)
Posted by: Christopher Taylor at April 13, 2014 06:32 AM (zfY+H)
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 13, 2014 06:34 AM (Mogjf)
Hello everyone from Sydney on Monday morning!
Only 4 days work and then Easter break (4 days) plus 3 days holiday plus Anzac Day ((April 25th) then the weekend - perfect mental health break I reckon
Something I've noticed here - some new book stores have been opening up - one brand in particular sells online and publicises that well but has heaps of book stores around the country which are doing quite well obviously
We still buy books at the book store, as well as online through the Book Depository/Amazon and of course Kindle (thanks Vic who feeds my Kindle addiction and I've got the 1632 collection waiting to be read !)
My recommendations....
Any cookbook by a very nice and talented Aussie Luke Nguyen - his recipes are good if you're interested in dabbling in Asian style dishes
Check out his docos on the SBS (Aussie TV station) site - he's travelled back to Vietnam and also done a trip down the length of the Mekong - very entertaining
Then if you are keen to learn about what economics should be - and not what is dished up by our Western economies these days...The Road to Serfdom by F.A Hayek
Have a great yesterday everyone!
Posted by: aussie at April 13, 2014 06:34 AM (XURZb)
Posted by: sock_rat_eez at April 13, 2014 06:34 AM (+jyzN)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) [/b] [/i] [/s] at April 13, 2014 06:35 AM (HDwDg)
Posted by: Retread at April 13, 2014 06:35 AM (cHwk5)
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 13, 2014 06:36 AM (Mogjf)
There's a eulogy by John Ringo for his mother in the back of Citadel (2nd of 3 so far in Live Free or Die series). She was quite an adventuress and character herself. Makes some of Cally more believable but maybe not the Kindergarden Killer.
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at April 13, 2014 06:37 AM (DL2i+)
Posted by: Illegal Alien who voted 25 times in 2012 at April 13, 2014 06:37 AM (2w+1/)
Posted by: Tammy al-Thor at April 13, 2014 06:37 AM (63X/k)
Posted by: Adam at April 13, 2014 06:37 AM (Aif/5)
Posted by: Y-not at April 13, 2014 06:38 AM (zDsvJ)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at April 13, 2014 06:38 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: awkward davies at April 13, 2014 06:41 AM (whqez)
Posted by: Sandra Fluke at April 13, 2014 06:42 AM (Mogjf)
Posted by: eman at April 13, 2014 06:42 AM (AO9UG)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 06:42 AM (zpNwC)
The same may end up being said about Obama, except I don't think he's as comfortable in his own skin as Nixon was in his. That, and Nixon had the brakes put on him very sharply by his own party before he got completely out of control. That will not happen with Obama, and we'll be the worse off because of it....
Posted by: Jenk at April 13, 2014 06:45 AM (e2ysZ)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 06:45 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Barack Obama at April 13, 2014 06:46 AM (Mogjf)
Posted by: awkward davies at April 13, 2014 10:41 AM (whqez)
I just got past the point where Aubrey got plowed at a party and talked about how his crew was ready with "yard-long pricks" to deal with the ladies before Maturin hustled him out at the insistence of the hostess. I was LOLing.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 13, 2014 06:46 AM (yT+eY)
Posted by: Trimegistus at April 13, 2014 06:49 AM (2NrWL)
Posted by: waelse1 at April 13, 2014 10:23 AM (VrAbp)
Have you read any of Jack McDevitt's books? Sci-fi mysteries, very well written. I thoroughly enjoy him.
Posted by: HH at April 13, 2014 06:51 AM (XXwdv)
Of course, in New York that means anything to the right of the current mayor.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 13, 2014 06:51 AM (QFxY5)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 06:52 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: biancaneve at April 13, 2014 06:53 AM (2sR50)
Posted by: The Walking Dude at April 13, 2014 06:53 AM (lOJcj)
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 13, 2014 06:53 AM (Mogjf)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 06:53 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Adam at April 13, 2014 10:37 AM (Aif/5)
And?
I think it's a great book.
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 13, 2014 06:55 AM (QFxY5)
Posted by: Sgt. Mom at April 13, 2014 06:55 AM (Asjr7)
Posted by: Gingy @GingyNorth at April 13, 2014 06:55 AM (N/cFh)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 06:55 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: biancaneve at April 13, 2014 10:53 AM (2sR50)
When they stop being enjoyable. With "Dune" that happened pretty quick.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 13, 2014 06:55 AM (yT+eY)
Posted by: Insomniac at April 13, 2014 06:56 AM (mx5oN)
Posted by: mindful webworker - print is dead at April 13, 2014 06:56 AM (u57y4)
http://cuteemergency.com/
Posted by: SnowyBits at April 13, 2014 06:57 AM (NqhG2)
Posted by: notropis at April 13, 2014 06:57 AM (bvlUm)
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 13, 2014 10:55 AM (yT+eY)
Like after the second book, which itself was shit compared to the first.
Of course Dune may be the greatest SciFi book ever written, so that's a high bar.....
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 13, 2014 06:58 AM (QFxY5)
How do you decide to quit reading a series?
When the author spends a whole novel going off on what a blessing abortion is and how horrible and H8-filled anyone who thinks it's wrong is. Ding! No more books from that bitch.
Posted by: HR at April 13, 2014 06:59 AM (hO8IJ)
Posted by: biancaneve at April 13, 2014 06:59 AM (2sR50)
Posted by: kbdabear at April 13, 2014 07:00 AM (aTXUx)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 13, 2014 07:03 AM (0HooB)
Goodwin is pretty clearly a libertarian LuapNor guy, but both books make for an interesting read. I do recommend having your tinfoil hat handy, however.
If nothing else, his cast of characters is priceless:
Randall Paul: Republican Senator running as an independent for President
Juan Marcos: Republican RINO Presidential candidate
Mustafa al Mohammed: The current President
Anthony Howe: Dem presidential candidate
Ed Nolan: CNC news anchor
Hayden Nicholas: Conservative governor of South Carolina
Posted by: Country Singer at April 13, 2014 07:03 AM (r/e1Q)
Posted by: SnowyBits at April 13, 2014 07:04 AM (NqhG2)
Posted by: Country Singer at April 13, 2014 07:04 AM (r/e1Q)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 07:05 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: biancaneve at April 13, 2014 07:05 AM (2sR50)
Posted by: PJ at April 13, 2014 07:06 AM (ZWaLo)
Posted by: Tammy al-Thor at April 13, 2014 07:07 AM (63X/k)
Posted by: Donna and V. (presently ampersandless) at April 13, 2014 07:07 AM (2w+1/)
Posted by: doug at April 13, 2014 07:08 AM (O4p89)
Posted by: tsrblke, PhD(c) (No Really!) [/b] [/i] [/s] at April 13, 2014 07:10 AM (HDwDg)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 07:11 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at April 13, 2014 07:12 AM (1htQa)
Posted by: Albie Damned at April 13, 2014 07:13 AM (cGaCp)
Being an Aussie, I've always relied on the US to provide us with a security blanket.
This is a bit like a security blankie I had when I was a kidlet - it's gone.
That's my horror sentences for today...
Posted by: aussie at April 13, 2014 07:14 AM (XURZb)
Class president Chuck U. Farley
Posted by: OregonMuse at April 13, 2014 07:15 AM (fTJ5O)
Posted by: mindful webworker is done 4 today at April 13, 2014 07:15 AM (6B4ha)
Peter Jackson did a movie about this sensational case around 1996 or so, "Heavenly Creatures", and it was quite good.
Posted by: OregonMuse at April 13, 2014 07:17 AM (fTJ5O)
Posted by: RWC at April 13, 2014 07:18 AM (QeH9j)
I"m willing to bet that anyone who does any sneering about living in NYC is a transplant, not a native. And when I say 'native new yorker" i mean that you spend Thanksgiving within the five boroughs - that is to say, you don't have a foxhole somewhere else to retreat to.
I have nothing to prove to anyone, I'm too damn busy getting on with it. I do sneer, though, but the only sneering I do is with the newbies, transplants, hipster d-bags, Eurotrash and trustafarians who think my home is a theme park.
Developers are Satan. Folks familiar with NYC may know one of the few remaining landmark bookstores - Argosy ("Wise men fish here") in midtown. It's still there because when they moved there in the 20's the bookseller bought the building. I know folks who work there who say several times a week developers knock on their doors trying to convince the owners to sell...and some developers try to sue them to compel them to sell and I know real estate lawyers who say that is not unusual.
Posted by: vivi at April 13, 2014 07:18 AM (+/8mE)
Posted by: am We correct yet? at April 13, 2014 07:19 AM (oBzH0)
Posted by: kbdabear at April 13, 2014 07:19 AM (aTXUx)
Posted by: doug at April 13, 2014 07:20 AM (O4p89)
Posted by: Gingy @GingyNorth at April 13, 2014 10:55 AM (N/cFh)
And being Twitter, there is another account called "Very Short Sequel."
Posted by: Retread at April 13, 2014 07:21 AM (cHwk5)
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at April 13, 2014 07:23 AM (1htQa)
Posted by: Adam at April 13, 2014 07:23 AM (Aif/5)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 13, 2014 07:24 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: Emile Antoon Khadaji at April 13, 2014 07:24 AM (/8qpd)
Posted by: Soothie at April 13, 2014 07:26 AM (5c3Xp)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 13, 2014 07:27 AM (/8So2)
Posted by: Jen at April 13, 2014 07:27 AM (Mt+Yq)
Posted by: SnowyBits at April 13, 2014 07:27 AM (NqhG2)
We had finally survived eight years of the Obama regime. Then we realized it was to be followed by eight years of the Hillary regime.
Posted by: cool breeze at April 13, 2014 07:27 AM (A+/8k)
Posted by: RWC at April 13, 2014 07:28 AM (QeH9j)
Posted by: RWC at April 13, 2014 07:30 AM (QeH9j)
Posted by: JohnJ at April 13, 2014 07:30 AM (TF/YA)
*pulls from the shelves*
100 Great Science Fiction Short Short Stories edited by Isaac Asimov, Martin Greenberg, and Joseph D. Olander. Avon Books. 1978.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 13, 2014 07:30 AM (/8So2)
Posted by: Soothie at April 13, 2014 07:31 AM (5c3Xp)
Posted by: doug at April 13, 2014 07:31 AM (O4p89)
They did something similar in the Sunday Newspaper parody (which, disappointingly, I could not find on Amazon). They had stories about this character who was breaking into women's homes and forcibly giving them enemas (don't ask me how). The police were "baffled", but there were clues scattered throughout all the articles, so if you read them carefully enough, you could figure out who he was.
Posted by: OregonMuse at April 13, 2014 07:31 AM (fTJ5O)
Posted by: Lauren at April 13, 2014 07:31 AM (hFL/3)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 13, 2014 07:32 AM (DmNpO)
Yeah, he believed in winning. What would you prefer, the Bush approach, where the leadership of the GOP affects a fussiness about responding to the most scurrilous and damaging of attacks. All the while hoping that their endless displays of "class" finally gets rewarded by the electorate? Is that you prefer?
Our party hasn't run a half-way decent attack ad since the death of Lee Atwater!
We didn't run ANY genuine attack ads against Obama in 2008, and the situation was even worse in '12. You can't win contests when the other side enjoys such media advantages without running blistering, bone-breaking attack ads!
Nixon understood victory!
And that it was that understanding, the mindset, which allowed him to order Linebacker I, and then when the North Viets welshed, Linebacker II, (otherwise known as the Christmas bombings). He ended that war by bombing the enemy! And had he handled the idiotic watergate scandal as he should have, by dismissing the whole thing as much ado about nothing, because that election was a foregone conclusion, the North Viets would not have been able to subsequently conquer the South!
One party tried to bug the other in an election that was decided the moment that the Democrats went with the whifty McGovern! Nixon took 48 states in '72, and dirty tricks had NOTHING to do with it at all.
I for one prefer political leaders who FIGHT TO WIN, instead of these weirdos who rationalize their own self-inflicted, deep-seated defeatism!
Posted by: Dan M. at April 13, 2014 07:32 AM (K7rSv)
Posted by: am We correct yet? at April 13, 2014 07:33 AM (oBzH0)
Posted by: RWC at April 13, 2014 07:34 AM (QeH9j)
Posted by: BackwardsBoy, who did not vote for this shit [/i][/s][/b][/u] at April 13, 2014 07:36 AM (0HooB)
Posted by: kbdabear at April 13, 2014 07:36 AM (aTXUx)
Posted by: Soothie at April 13, 2014 07:37 AM (5c3Xp)
Posted by: baldilocks at April 13, 2014 07:38 AM (36Rjy)
Posted by: JohnJ at April 13, 2014 07:40 AM (TF/YA)
We should all be so lucky to have a Nixon around today. And yeah I know he disagreed vehemently with how Reagan conducted and won the cold war. Yeah, I know all about that, and his supreme court nominations. I know the full record, detente, the whole bit.
But at least he fought!
Instead of these squalid puss**s we have in charge of the GOP today!
Posted by: Dan M. at April 13, 2014 07:40 AM (K7rSv)
Posted by: Trimegistus at April 13, 2014 07:42 AM (2NrWL)
Posted by: 'Ette in training at April 13, 2014 07:42 AM (zvxqj)
Posted by: Rightrt at April 13, 2014 07:43 AM (ODTDL)
Posted by: Eric the old OC tanker at April 13, 2014 07:44 AM (rMyGM)
Posted by: moki at April 13, 2014 07:44 AM (EvHC8)
Posted by: moki at April 13, 2014 07:45 AM (EvHC8)
Posted by: Corolianus Snow at April 13, 2014 07:49 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: jwpaine @PirateBallerina at April 13, 2014 07:52 AM (2oU2+)
I'll take a walk with you through the upper West side, wearing a suitably inflammatory t-shirt (pro-2nd Amendment).
How will the 3rd generation NYers react to me?
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 13, 2014 07:52 AM (QFxY5)
Posted by: Tammy al-Thor at April 13, 2014 07:53 AM (63X/k)
Posted by: Colorado Alex at April 13, 2014 07:54 AM (lr3d7)
Ronan Farrow awoke with the sunlight streaming through the window of his rent controlled apartment in New York City, he rolled over and felt his arm fall upon another slumbering body in his bed. They say his blood curling screams could be heard all the way down in the Battery when he spied Roseanne Barr next to him.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at April 13, 2014 07:54 AM (/8So2)
Posted by: Rightrt at April 13, 2014 11:43 AM (ODTDL)
The restriction may have been the owners of the building.
But...there absolutely are restrictions: my sister could not install a disposal. She did it anyway, but....
Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at April 13, 2014 07:54 AM (QFxY5)
Posted by: sock_rat_eez at April 13, 2014 07:55 AM (+jyzN)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 07:55 AM (zpNwC)
And I've heard that only a true New Yorker can explain the difference.
Posted by: OregonMuse at April 13, 2014 07:55 AM (fTJ5O)
Posted by: Corolianus Snow at April 13, 2014 07:55 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: Rightrt at April 13, 2014 07:56 AM (ODTDL)
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at April 13, 2014 11:23 AM (1htQa)
Those turds deserve to be constantly beaten down which I'm more than happy and adept at doing.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 13, 2014 07:56 AM (yT+eY)
Posted by: Soothie at April 13, 2014 08:00 AM (5c3Xp)
One party tried to bug the other in an election that was decided the moment that the Democrats went with the whifty McGovern! Nixon took 48 states in '72, and dirty tricks had NOTHING to do with it at all.
I for one prefer political leaders who FIGHT TO WIN, instead of these weirdos who rationalize their own self-inflicted, deep-seated defeatism!
Posted by: Dan M. at April 13, 2014 11:32 AM (K7rSv)
It's pretty funny that the point of Watergate was to trash Humphrey's chances to win the primaries in favor of McGovern, which is also what all the anti-Nixon lefty dickholes wanted.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 13, 2014 08:03 AM (yT+eY)
Posted by: BishopWash [/i] at April 13, 2014 08:03 AM (5cQ4H)
Posted by: JHW at April 13, 2014 08:03 AM (A4PmA)
Posted by: bour3 at April 13, 2014 08:06 AM (5x3+2)
Posted by: Weirddave at April 13, 2014 08:10 AM (N/cFh)
Posted by: Corolianus Snow at April 13, 2014 08:11 AM (Jsiw/)
1972 was a cakewalk for Nixon as there really was no realistic way for McGovern to win; that said Nixon should have come clean about Watergate when it broke and stepped hard on the "Plumbers". But really he couldn't. He was too convinced (rightly as it turned out) that the other side was playing dirty poker that the only way he could win was by playing dirtier poker, so he was responsible at least indirectly for the "Plumbers". His personal secretive nature and desire to avoid being compromised caused him to try to cover up a penny-ante scandal that blew up not only in his face but all of ours as well. It was Nixon's "A Bridge Too Far" that caused the GOP to turn on him lest the party's image became tainted.
Naive, in a sense, as Nixon was hardly worse than either LBJ or JFK (the latter being more incompetent than corrupt but still not nearly as bad as his successors), but the difference was that the Democrats closed ranks behind them while Nixon was forced out and Ford was forced to fall upon his own sword in an attempt to cleanse the party's image of honor.
In the end it was only Carter's gross bumbling incompetence that really ended Watergate and allowed Reagan to shine briefly, but it's been downhill since then--on both sides....
Posted by: Jenk at April 13, 2014 08:12 AM (e2ysZ)
Posted by: Tammy al-Thor at April 13, 2014 08:13 AM (63X/k)
Posted by: Kindletot at April 13, 2014 08:15 AM (caMDw)
1. Group starts Presbyterian church in San Francisco
2. Short on music help, said church hires guy to play the piano
3. Guy turns out to be gay
4. Church fires gay guy
5. Hilarity ensues
6. And by "hilarity", I mean harassing/obscene phone calls to the church and pastor's private phone at all hours, lawsuits, verbal abuse, death threats, vandalism, and street protests, including property damage with the San Francisco police standing around like potted plants."
--------------------------
A few days ago I was listening to Moody Radio ( broadcast from Moody Bible Institute in Chicago) when I caught the last half of a talk given by a Chinese pastor who escaped from China in the late 90's. He was talking about how in China, when a person comes to Christ, one of the first things the underground church does is educate them in what they lightheartedly call "Prison 101". Meaning, if you are going to follow Christ in China, you will pay a price, often one of imprisonment, the loss of your job, expulsion from University, etc.
So anyway, skipping ahead, this Chinese pastor and his wife escape Communist China and now have a ministry in the United States and around the world. The pastor tells the story of how when he went to San Francisco, he met with churches and business owners there, encouraging them to take a bold stand for Christ. Some of the men he spoke to countered his proposals with "But we can't do that here! The ACLU would be all over us! We'd get sued!"
The Chinese pastor's response: "And so what? Why would that stop you?"
Anyway, I checked out his book from the library yesterday called "God's Double Agent", by Bob Fu. I've only read the first chapter. It is harrowing.
Posted by: grammie winger at April 13, 2014 08:17 AM (oMKp3)
I'm off to walk the dog even though it is 39degrees out. What we do for our pets!
Posted by: SnowyBits at April 13, 2014 08:22 AM (NqhG2)
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at April 13, 2014 08:24 AM (b/lt+)
Posted by: Kindletot at April 13, 2014 08:26 AM (caMDw)
Posted by: SDN at April 13, 2014 08:30 AM (gPHN8)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 13, 2014 08:36 AM (DmNpO)
Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at April 13, 2014 08:38 AM (DmNpO)
What is happening in San Francisco right now would tend to disprove that theory.
And commercial renters willing to pay the high prices they do currently, would still be competing for space that could be either commercial or residential.
I'm no fan of rent control.. but it seems to me any popular urban area will have prices rise to the whatever the market will bear and force out blue collar and lower income residents. And that's probably how it should be and has been all over the country for decades. Those lower income people move to other neighborhoods, revitalize them, and the cycle continues.
Posted by: Chi-Town Jerry at April 13, 2014 08:38 AM (b/lt+)
You can't go by SF or any other large CA town on the coast. But if you go out and do some research you will find that in city after city where rent control (or stabilization) is put in place rents actually go up in the long run.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at April 13, 2014 08:43 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Daybrother at April 13, 2014 08:50 AM (s4Rjj)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at April 13, 2014 08:50 AM (XyM/Y)
[1] In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
[2] The same was in the beginning with God.
[3] All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
[4] In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
[5] And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
[6] There was a man sent from God, whose name was John.
[7] The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.
[8] He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.
[9] That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
[10] He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
[11] He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
[12] But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
[13] Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
[14] And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Posted by: Captain Ned at April 13, 2014 08:51 AM (i+Fm3)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith at April 13, 2014 08:52 AM (qyfb5)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 08:54 AM (zpNwC)
You're assuming that the amount of housing stock would remain the same. In a deregulated market, it might actually increase due to the improvement of the business climate, which would put downward pressure on rents.
Posted by: OregonMuse at April 13, 2014 08:55 AM (fTJ5O)
Posted by: OregonMuse at April 13, 2014 08:56 AM (fTJ5O)
A long time ago, I worked at bookstores in between assignments. One was Borders in San Mateo -- what I liked is they tried to tie workers with section knowledge. I always got history and travel. People would come and read entire books and there would be a lot of chatting back and forth while I shelved or whatever. I always liked that about that Borders -- and as long as they had the same Manager -- I got to come and go.
Before that, there was a travel bookstore in Stanford Shopping Center, Phileas Fogg. Small, upscale and NO reading the books that's for sure. Still, fun.
And finally, during the same time period I started trekking out to Corte Madera to Book Passages which at the time was small but good for travel. Now it is large and two locations -- including one in the Ferry Building.
Who knows if the crazies get control of the internet, maybe books and bookstores will make a comeback.
Posted by: gracepmc at April 13, 2014 08:59 AM (rznx3)
Posted by: gracepmc at April 13, 2014 09:00 AM (rznx3)
Posted by: Daybrother at April 13, 2014 09:04 AM (NXZ98)
Posted by: grammie winger at April 13, 2014 09:06 AM (oMKp3)
Yeah cause losing but doing it fairly is so rewarding.
How's that been working out for the country these last few years?
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Waiting For SMODOT) at April 13, 2014 09:08 AM (JS0vr)
Really, REALLY?
Nixon gave us the EPA, Gerald Ford and his pardon which gave us Carter.
And truth be told, Reagan didn't do all that well either because of back to back House and Senate domination.
Nixon tainted the Republican party in such a way that it still hasn't recovered fully.
Granted he was abused by the press and all but he was a disaster.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Waiting For SMODOT) at April 13, 2014 09:11 AM (JS0vr)
Posted by: Daybrother at April 13, 2014 09:15 AM (aL1qE)
You're wrong.
Rent control distorts the market. Make it less profitable to build new/more housing. The rules have shrunk the SRO Hotels. It drives up taxes because of lost revenue.
Something like 40% of rents are rent controlled or rent regulated.
And Yes the price goes up because of demand but the supply is artificially reduced by the lack of sufficient new apartment buildings and conversions.
yes the rents would be high no matter what in New York but compare what a rent goes for in Chicago or even LA to what is paid in New York.
It's at least triple to quadruple. And it causes distortions out in the suburbs as those who can't find a place in New York move there thus creating traffic and commuter jams and raising the price of living for miles around.
I've always considered NYC the black hole of cities. It distorts everything for miles around it.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Waiting For SMODOT) at April 13, 2014 09:19 AM (JS0vr)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 09:36 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 09:41 AM (zpNwC)
My exotic Island girlfriend finally invited me to her home for dinner with her family. Just as I noticed there was no food on the table, the door clicked shut behind me and they all grinned wickedly, exposing rows of sharpened teeth.
Posted by: lyle at April 13, 2014 09:42 AM (w2pv/)
Posted by: waelse1 at April 13, 2014 10:00 AM (VrAbp)
Posted by: BornLib at April 13, 2014 10:03 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Tonestaple at April 13, 2014 10:16 AM (B7YN4)
Posted by: Jen at April 13, 2014 10:17 AM (Mt+Yq)
Posted by: Tantrumblogo at April 13, 2014 10:23 AM (euACX)
Posted by: JoeyBagels at April 13, 2014 10:38 AM (0CCdz)
Posted by: Merovign, Dark Lord of the Sith[/i] [/b] [/s] [/u] at April 13, 2014 10:48 AM (qyfb5)
Posted by: Elisabeth G. Wolfe at April 13, 2014 10:52 AM (Aiwi+)
Posted by: Huggy at April 13, 2014 10:56 AM (5TdZp)
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at April 13, 2014 10:59 AM (afLO3)
"They had class pictures with all sorts of hilarious names in the caption. "Phil Accio, Ima Dork, Harry P. Ness" , etc"
If my memory serves, the best name was "Madison Avenue Jones." Still makes me laugh after all these years.
Posted by: Jaclyn at April 13, 2014 11:02 AM (ocU5X)
The economic policies Nixon inflicted are an ongoing disaster. So much of the bad stuff done by later administrations was enabled by the policies set at Bretton Woods.
Posted by: Epobirs at April 13, 2014 11:11 AM (bPxS6)
Posted by: boulder t'hobo at April 13, 2014 11:18 AM (30eLQ)
Posted by: boulder t'hobo at April 13, 2014 11:24 AM (30eLQ)
Keep in mind those setting worked quite well for Borders for many years. The world changed. The bulk of the damage was not done by e-readers. (Borders sold the Kobo devices which were set to default to Border e-book store. Kobo is a big e-reader brand outside the US.) The biggest hit came from Costco, Target, and Walmart. Like the old record business, most of the profits come form a handful of big sellers in any one year. Stores like Costco only stocked a few dozen titles but those are the books sustaining the publishing industry at that moment.
I learned from my time as an Assistant Manager at a Crown Books that a lot of book buyers ignore anything except what is on the bestseller list. The District Manager once speculated, during a visit, that the store could be reduced to just the back wall where current bestsellers were displayed and only lose about 20% of its revenue. The book sections at places like Costco have done that and since people need to get other stuff from those stores, they find less reason to go into a dedicated bookstore at all.
This was already having a serious impact on book stores before the Kindle hit the market and was the first really successful e-reader product.
Posted by: Epobirs at April 13, 2014 11:25 AM (bPxS6)
Posted by: boulder t'hobo at April 13, 2014 03:24 PM (30eLQ)
I read the Pendragon Cycle and thought it was OK. And they had this next one on one of those one day sales for $1.99. There are two more books in the series. I will not get them.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at April 13, 2014 11:26 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: boulder t'hobo at April 13, 2014 11:26 AM (30eLQ)
Posted by: JoeyBagels at April 13, 2014 12:12 PM (0CCdz)
Posted by: FOAF at April 13, 2014 12:15 PM (rZ7kp)
Posted by: FOAF at April 13, 2014 12:16 PM (rZ7kp)
Every president since Truman has had some sort of classified document assembled detailing how to proceed in a succession crisis. The advent of the atomic bomb raised the threat of a decapitation strike, killing not only the president but much of the upper echelons of the federal government. Directive 51 was George W. Bush's edition of this plan. The difference was that it was partially made available for public scrutiny. It couldn't be completely exposed as doing so would provide a blueprint for an enemy to use in their planning but this openness fueled a lot of discussion, especially in the more conspiratorially minded areas of the net.
In the book, a group that may have leaders or may have formed spontaneously from AGs (Affinity Groups) decides to destroy what it calls the Big System aka industrial civilization. Through the use of nanotech and genetically engineered bacteria they destroy or render unusable every technology created after about 1850. This may sound like a bizarre contradiction, that people who were adept with technology would seek to eliminate it and cast everyone back to a far rougher world but you can find those in real life who express such desires while hanging out on web site they access with their iPad.
The Daybreak movement is far worse than an EMP attack (those come into play as well) because the change it renders is permanent. Build a new radio to replace the ruined one and the nanites will be drawn to the electromagnetic field and start producing nitric acid.
On top of all this there is a terrorist group that may or may not be connected to Daybreak and possesses fusion weapons that vastly exceed anything in the current nuclear arsenal.
So, things get bad very quickly. Billions die within the first year. Including all of the claimants to the office of President as defined by the Constitution. Thus Directive 51 comes into play.
This is the first of three novels in the series, with perhaps more to come. Barnes tries to get into the heads of the Daybreakers and how they rationalize their actions, knowing that vast numbers of people will die and the survivors lead much shorter, diminished lives. This feeds a subplot suggesting there may have been some form of remote brainwashing involved in the recruiting process. But recruiting by who? No evidence can be found of any central entity organizing the myriad participants.
I hope to see these question answered in the following volumes.
Posted by: Epobirs at April 13, 2014 12:49 PM (bPxS6)
Much of that is because you don't know what the next big thing is going to be. And new talent must be developed.
You'll find the same effect in many kinds of retail businesses. A Home Depot could be reduced to a more profitable store a fraction of its size if you want it to be a 7-11 version of a hardware store. And that may more effectively serve certain communities, so long as a store with a more extensive inventory is within reach. The book section at Costco won't wipe the big bookstore from existence but it will greatly reduce the number that can do a decent business and by necessity they will need to be on less costly real estate.
Going forward, a lot of books that would do very small numbers and have very high prices will likely not be published at all any more. Instead, they will exist as web sites or apps for devices like tablets. A token number of physical books may be produced as trophies for the author and others involved. This has an emotional effect but also raises a concern if we ever had something like the Daybreak scenario in 'Directive 51,' which mention above.
This reflects on the difference in retail business models and how they affect wages: http://tinyurl.com/k6awrvu
Posted by: Epobirs at April 13, 2014 01:10 PM (bPxS6)
Posted by: I lurk, therefore I amn't at April 13, 2014 02:00 PM (rz0yi)
How's that been working out for the country these last few years?
Yes, because replacing the unprincipled amoral Democrat douchebags with unprincipled amoral Republican douchebags is the path to prosperity and success!
Posted by: OregonMuse at April 13, 2014 02:32 PM (fTJ5O)
Posted by: Nfield4 at April 13, 2014 03:01 PM (gKSkN)
Posted by: deepelemblues at April 13, 2014 09:05 PM (eKL0i)
Posted by: deepelemblues at April 13, 2014 09:06 PM (eKL0i)
Posted by: Aaah--Clem at April 14, 2014 05:28 AM (rVMNS)
Posted by: OregonMuse at April 14, 2014 07:04 AM (fTJ5O)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.38 seconds, 366 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Y-not at April 13, 2014 06:03 AM (zDsvJ)