March 09, 2014

AOSHQDD- The Special Congressional Election in Florida (CD13)
— CAC

We are just two days away from the special election between Republican David Jolly and onetime Democratic gubernatorial candidate Alex Sink. Let's go through a quick breakdown of the district, past voting results, and how I see the race as it stands two days before the final decision.

First, C. W. Bill Young served as Congressman in this increasingly-Democratic swing district for decades, easily surviving redistricting with much of his original district well contained within CD8, then CD6, back to CD8, then CD10, and most recently CD13. While he carried the seat easily in 2012, Mitt Romney lost it to President Obama by about 1.4%. Two years prior, these same precincts voted for Charlie Crist over Marco Rubio in the senate race and Alex Sink over Rick Scott in the gubernatorial one. The district has voted for a Republican Presidential candidate three times in the last 30 years: 1984, 1988, and 2004. Casting “moderate” votes and pulling in the pork, Young built off of the slight Republican registration advantage in the district and kept the seat safe for the GOP, easily winning every single re-election.
With his passing in 2013, the seat instantly became a toss-up, and, with the entrance of well-known Democrat Alex Sink, lean Democratic per most analysts. As the weeks have passed and mail-in returns have rolled in, that analysis looked solid: Republicans enjoyed high single-to-double digit advantages in the mail-in returns for the 2012 and 2010 contests, but only a 2-point edge in this special election. Early in-person voting trends Democratic, and it has, giving the Democrats a current advantage (as of Saturday night) of about 230 votes.

The spending in the race has been astronomical: over $12 million has been devoted, mostly by outside groups. A grab bag of PACs have so far spent $4.9 million for Jolly, $3.7 million for Sink, while the candidates themselves have raised $1.2 million and $2.7 million respectively, giving Sink the slight edge in this metric. Ads have gone beyond the saturation point: the average resident of the district is being bombarded to the tune of over a hundred a day.

However, there has been a late “surge” in mail-in returns that have some Republicans hopeful of an upset: the mail-ins (again, as of Saturday night) now break five points in the Republicans' favor, spreading three points in a week. If that trend can continue, it may hit the magic number needed for Jolly to squeak out a win (I peg that number at 7%, since polling has shown an unfortunate number of Republicans (1 in 6) voting for Sink).

Any considerable edge in the mail-in vote will make a big difference, because a sizable majority of the total vote will have been cast before Tuesday: the current tally of mail-ins and early votes is now over 120,000 and we are forecasting a total vote of under 200,000 (special elections for Congress have exceeded that number only twice in the last decade). Assuming another 10,000 mail-ins and early ballots are cast, that means less than a third will be on Tuesday. If Republicans enter Tuesday with a net 5-6% edge in 2/3rds of the vote, you can see how it would be hard for Sink to finish the winner.

As we have seen in other close house races, a monkey wrench has been thrown in this one, hampering Republican efforts. Senator Rand Paul is reaching out to voters to help candidate Jolly neutralize a threat from Libertarian Lucas Overby, who has been polling between 4 and 7% of the vote. Overby has no conceivable shot at winning, so he has become a spoiler in Republican efforts to hold the seat: I project Sink with a 3-5 point lead as of today (barring, again, that “surge” sustaining through Tuesday), making his “small” share of the vote substantial.

So what should you take away from all of this? If you live in FL-13 and haven't already done so, MAIL IN YOUR RETURN if you have one. If you are an outside observer, understand the fundamentals of the race (party breakdown, past electoral preference, campaign spending) favor the Democrat, Alex Sink. Again, I see her winning by 3-5 points, but keep an eye on the early vote tallies by party from Pinellas County. Lastly, we will have live coverage of the returns on Tuesday night, the first crowd-sourced demonstration of AOSHQDD since 2012, so I encourage you all to tune in as we watch the first of many head-to-head contests in midterm 2014. JohnE, after being heavily medicated, is working furiously on the site and graphics. It should make for a fun night, regardless the result.

Posted by: CAC at 11:20 AM | Comments (45)
Post contains 790 words, total size 5 kb.

1 Sink the Pink Stink!

Posted by: J.J. Sefton at March 09, 2014 11:23 AM (olDqf)

2 Mail those votes in! The address is: "Hillary '16" HQ Box - yeah, we said "box" - 69 West Palm Beach, FL

Posted by: t-bird at March 09, 2014 11:24 AM (FcR7P)

3 Is the Libertarian being financed by the Democrats?

Posted by: Vic[/i] at March 09, 2014 11:25 AM (T2V/1)

4 The illegal alien vote will make up the winning margin for the GOP because natural conservative constituency and stuff.

Posted by: Karl Rove at March 09, 2014 11:25 AM (jpUgO)

5 Republican need to finance a "Green Party" candidate.

Posted by: Vic[/i] at March 09, 2014 11:25 AM (T2V/1)

6 CAC, I just sent you a DM on twitter re the FL13 practice run.

Posted by: Niedermeyer's Dead Horse at March 09, 2014 11:29 AM (DmNpO)

7 Republican need to finance a "Green Party" candidate. One of the worst things to happen to the (R) party in Presidential elections was when Ralph Nader stopped running.

Posted by: SE Pa Moron [/i] at March 09, 2014 11:29 AM (CnA98)

8 This seat was held by the R who was forced to resign over some bullshit coke thing, ya?

Posted by: soothsayer at March 09, 2014 11:34 AM (4mGlY)

9 You should see this race as an early referendum on obamacare. If you really truly believe R's will do very well in November on account of obamacare (which I do not), then the results of this election is the Test.

Posted by: soothsayer at March 09, 2014 11:37 AM (4mGlY)

10 Democrats learned their lesson with 3rd parties in 2000. Republicans will never learn. Stupid Party.

Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at March 09, 2014 11:37 AM (0LHZx)

11 I mean, if all the R's can end up winning in '14 are R districts and R states, then...

Posted by: soothsayer at March 09, 2014 11:38 AM (4mGlY)

12 The Democratic effort is cause for some confusion because these senators are calling for action in a chamber they control but without any specific legislation to offer up for a vote, or any timetable for action this year. Whitehouse spokesman Seth Larson said the overnight event is "just one of a number of steps that the Senate Climate Action Task Force will be taking this year, and we hope it will help get more Americans engaged in the important debate about how we can act on climate change."

Posted by: Islamic Rage Boy at March 09, 2014 11:40 AM (e8kgV)

13 "As we have seen in other close house races, a monkey wrench has been thrown in this one, hampering Republican efforts. Senator Rand Paul is reaching out to voters to help candidate Jolly neutralize a threat from Libertarian Lucas Overby, who has been polling between 4 and 7% of the vote."

Not since Reagan has there been any consistent effort by Republicans to go after libertarian voters, saying, hey, we like and admire you and we want you to be under our big tent.

To pick up on a pungent metaphor dating back to LBJ, the Republicans have instead chosen to have the libertarians outside the tent pissing in, than inside pissing out.

Note for example here, if that if the posited 4 to 7 percent were not being siphoned off by a protest candidate and were instead being collected by the GOP, this race would be in the bag.

Posted by: torquewrench at March 09, 2014 11:43 AM (gqT4g)

14 Afternoon all. Just got back from Del Ray FL where I had a wedding. Nice weather, but to many Liberals

Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 09, 2014 11:52 AM (nzKvP)

15 This seat was held by the R who was forced to resign over some bullshit coke thing, ya?

Posted by: soothsayer at March 09, 2014 03:34 PM (4mGlY)


No, it was held by Rep. Bill Young, who died in 2013.

Posted by: CQD at March 09, 2014 11:52 AM (4iOIE)

16 It been said a million times and should be said millions more. The gope will not give one single inch towards Libertarians or Social Conservatives. If you (as in the gope) want their votes maybe you should do something to earn them.

Posted by: GMB (et al) was a prepper before the word was even coined. at March 09, 2014 11:53 AM (nkPV9)

17 this will just be the first of many races the GOP loses this year...

whether they needed to or not. Party of St00pid.

Posted by: redc1c4 at March 09, 2014 11:58 AM (q+fqH)

18 In general, tired of losing winnable contests. 

Posted by: Smilin' Jack at March 09, 2014 12:02 PM (Xzj0B)

19 this will just be the first of many races the GOP loses this year... whether they needed to or not. Party of St00pid. Posted by: redc1c4 at March 09, 2014 03:58 PM (q+fqH) Yeah, maybe, but I don't think so. Even the stupid party is sometimes given a pooch it can't screw.

Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 09, 2014 12:02 PM (nzKvP)

20 Wouldn't take much to get the Libertarians and SoCons on board. A honest effort to get rid of federal funding for abortion and closing down the Department of Education.

Neither one of those functions is an enumerated duty of the Federal Government.

Posted by: GMB (et al) was a prepper before the word was even coined. at March 09, 2014 12:03 PM (nkPV9)

21 No maps on the weekend is part of the AOSHQ austerity plan.

Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at March 09, 2014 12:05 PM (oFCZn)

22 No maps on the weekend is part of the AOSHQ austerity plan. Posted by: Dack ----------------- That's a narrow perspective.

Posted by: Mike Hammer at March 09, 2014 12:07 PM (aDwsi)

23 No maps on the weekend is part of the AOSHQ austerity plan. Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at March 09, 2014 04:05 PM (oFCZn) Ya mean we gonna have to actually "Read"? Fuck next your gonna tell we are having a math test?

Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 09, 2014 12:08 PM (nzKvP)

24
In general, tired of losing winnable contests.

Posted by: Smilin' Jack at March 09, 2014 04:02 PM (Xzj0B)


Me too, and if the IRS hadn't screwed with me, I could have been a contender. 

Posted by: Christine O'Donnell (COD) at March 09, 2014 12:09 PM (nQjHM)

25
Let me get this straight.

Republicans are burning thru millions for a special election, in a Democratic leaning district, for a seat that they'll just have to run for again in November.  To try and pad out their margin in the House they already hold. Instead of saving the resources for a governor or Senate race somewhere this Fall.

That about right?




Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 09, 2014 12:13 PM (kdS6q)

26 CAC,

Does the early voting trend match that of previous elections?

Posted by: CharlieBrown'sDildo at March 09, 2014 12:14 PM (QFxY5)

27 That about right? Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 09, 2014 04:13 PM (kdS6q) Yup!

Posted by: Velvet Ambition at March 09, 2014 12:14 PM (R8hU8)

28 Hey Florida is some freaken State. For this wedding I went to, both the Hotel and the Car I rented but a 20% "deposit" fee on the charges for the "authorization". Now they got taken off, but I never saw that before

Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 09, 2014 12:18 PM (nzKvP)

29 Republicans are burning thru millions for a special election, in a Democratic leaning district, for a seat that they'll just have to run for again in November. Most of the funding is from outside groups (PACs), not the RNCC. As the incumbent, the winner of the special election would have a major advantage come the general election.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 09, 2014 12:20 PM (SY2Kh)

30 Florida has Special Erections? oh, never mind.

Posted by: Lincolntf at March 09, 2014 12:21 PM (ZshNr)

31 Hey Florida is some freaken State. For this wedding I went to, both the Hotel and the Car I rented but a 20% "deposit" fee on the charges for the "authorization". Now they got taken off, but I never saw that before Posted by: Nevergiveup at March 09, 2014 04:18 PM (nzKvP) Try renting a house. $200 application fee and then they always rent it to someone else. If they're not scamming BP they're scamming you.

Posted by: Cat-Snatch-Beavaar at March 09, 2014 12:23 PM (LHgfw)

32 Note for example here, if that if the posited 4 to 7 percent were not being siphoned off by a protest candidate and were instead being collected by the GOP, this race would be in the bag. Libertarian candidates usually under-perform prior polling results on election day. People say they're going to vote Libertarian, but when it comes time to pull the lever they often go for either the Dem or GOP candidate. Also, the Libertarian candidates don't siphon votes exclusively from the GOP. They also get votes from liberal stoners- there are a lot of lefties who (inexplicably) identify as Libertarian.

Posted by: Hollowpoint at March 09, 2014 12:25 PM (SY2Kh)

33 Don't vote it only encourages them....

Posted by: IrishEd at March 09, 2014 12:30 PM (bfm04)

34
Most of the funding is from outside groups (PACs), not the RNCC. As the incumbent, the winner of the special election would have a major advantage come the general election.
Posted by: Hollowpoint



The RNCC is just another PAC with better catered lunches.  It's all the same resource pool.

And if the Fall narrative is true, Republican tide in November "Senate +6 is a lock" and what have you, then the seat would swing back naturally in a few months even if the Democrats took it now.

The resources expended don't make much sense, strategically. The Brown MA Senate special election did, but not this.

Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at March 09, 2014 12:37 PM (kdS6q)

35 Bill Young was liked by many here, and he was a friend to the military. David Jolly worked for him. I am hoping that will help carry Jolly. Sink is renting a condo in the county. Says she'll buy a house next year sometime. Wench doesn't even live in this district.

Posted by: Rohon at March 09, 2014 12:44 PM (Me3Ag)

36 Since things are slow here, I'll mention that Mark Steyn's latest in the print version of National Review makes me wonder about even bothering with elections.   (But, yes, I will continue to vote.)

To summarize a full page article, Steyn says that culture trumps elections, and guess who is way ahead of conservatives in changing culture in the 729 days between elections.


Posted by: Smilin' Jack at March 09, 2014 12:55 PM (Xzj0B)

37 "and guess who is way ahead of
conservatives in changing culture in the 729 days between elections."

I see no difference between culture and morals. Changing cultural values would be social engineering and the ptb's have already said that's a no no.

Posted by: GMB (et al) at March 09, 2014 01:08 PM (nkPV9)

38 Food thread up

Posted by: Y-not at March 09, 2014 01:18 PM (zDsvJ)

39 37 I see no difference between culture and morals. Changing cultural values would be social engineering and the ptb's have already said that's a no no.

Posted by: GMB (et al) at March 09, 2014 05:08 PM (nkPV9)


About cultural change, one of Steyn's examples is this: "In  1986, in a concurrence to a majority opinion, the Chief Justice of the US declared that 'there is no such thing as a fundamental right to commit homosexual sodomy.' A blink of an eye, and his successors are discovering fundamental rights to commit homosexual marriage."  

Many Americans disagree, but the PTBs see that a whole lot of Americans do agree.  



Posted by: Smilin' Jack at March 09, 2014 01:25 PM (Xzj0B)

40 Steyn précis and link linked in my sock.

Posted by: [/i]andycanuck[/b] at March 09, 2014 01:35 PM (hn5v5)

41 Hasn't the 13th elected a Rep for the last 30 years? McCain carried it in 2008 as I recall. I live in the district. With all the stupid things Sink says, I can't believe she will win this. And if the peeps are really upset at Obamacare, that goes double. People didn't vote in 2012 for a variety of reasons. The Libertarian candidate probably is the spoiler if Sink is ahead. The last poll I saw had Jolly up 2 with a MOE of 4.5%. I know the spec elec really doesn't mean much as it gets repeated in short order. I haven't heard much coffee talk about it so people may stay home for it. Plus people are stupid and uninformed for the most part.

Posted by: Laddy at March 09, 2014 01:37 PM (0tFfv)

42 I agree that if Obamacare is really going to be a factor in Nov, then the Republican's win this.

Posted by: Gyaos at March 09, 2014 02:21 PM (yWFG6)

43 Libertarians: the Democrat's Fifth Column.

Posted by: Steve in Greensboro at March 09, 2014 04:02 PM (ZG3Fa)

44 43 Libertarians: the Democrat's Fifth Column. Posted by: Steve in Greensboro at March 09, 2014 08:02 PM (ZG3Fa) In the most recent elections, the Libertarian candidate is in no way libertarian and neither are most of his voters. The Libertarian candidate exists to keep the electorate from focusing on a sharp contrast between the D and R candidate. If there is an embarassing story about a candidate (like, say, Alex Sink's remarks about our pressing need for Hispanic gardeners and maids), the MSM can ignore it in favor of a horserace story. Libertarian voters tend to be third-party malcontents who are allowed to funnel their anger to "both parties" rather than being forced to confront the one causing the problem.

Posted by: AmishDude at March 09, 2014 04:59 PM (xSegX)

45 CAC, are the early and mail-in voting totals a count of votes already cast, or simply a tally of the party affiliations of voters who have already turned in their ballots or voted early?

Posted by: Michael Bates at March 09, 2014 07:11 PM (W8GRV)

Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
91kb generated in CPU 0.0888, elapsed 0.2707 seconds.
64 queries taking 0.2524 seconds, 173 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.