April 18, 2014
— Ace I think this problem can be subsumed under my general political observation that "People are just awful."
And there's really no way around that, is there?
Best we can do is mitigate the harm by making government smaller, thus limiting the harm that people can inflict when they gather into Battleclans for Tribal Warfare.
And of course that's not happening any time soon.
[Full disclosure and complete transparency] used to be my position. No longer. I had not foreseen how donor lists would be used not to ferret out corruption but to pursue and persecute citizens with contrary views. Which corrupts the very idea of full disclosure.It is now an invitation to the creation of enemies lists....
Sometimes the state itself does the harassing. The IRS scandal left many members of political groups exposed to abuse, such as the unlawful release of confidential data....
The ultimate victim here is full disclosure itself. If revealing your views opens you to the politics of personal destruction, then transparency, however valuable, must give way to the ultimate core political good, free expression.
Our collective loss. Coupling unlimited donations and full disclosure was a reasonable way to reconcile the irreconcilables of campaign finance. Like so much else in our politics, however, it has been ruined by zealots. What a pity.
The whole column is worth reading, but I can't quote it all, of course.
Kevin D. Williamson has more thoughts on the related issue of the militarization of the speech police.
Down in Travis County, Texas, where the stink of cronyism has Republicans in the legislature and Democrats in the bureaucracies sniffing each othersÂ’ tails like opportunistic stray dogs, University of Texas regent Wallace Hall is facing the possibility of criminal prosecution for helping to expose the bipartisan scandal of Texas politiciansÂ’ seeking preferential treatment for friends and family in university admissions....In a sane world, Wallace Hall would get a medal for bringing attention to wrongdoing by elected officials, but the university establishment and the political establishment relish their comfortable symbiosis.
Others dream of prosecution, too. The political class is infatuated with speech regulations (which we are expected to call “campaign-finance laws”) because its members harbor a self-interested desire to set the terms under which political contests are fought. That is corruption, and a particularly nasty sort of corruption at that: corruption dressed up as a reform crusade....
The irony here is that it is the ones doing the prosecuting are the ones who should be prosecuted. It is against the law to use IRS resources for political vendettas and to maliciously prosecute citizens to further partisan political interests. Those are serious crimes — serious because they pervert the fundamental relationship between citizen and state. But we are enduring what Sam Francis called “anarcho-tyranny,” a situation in which the government either refuses to or is unable to enforce its most fundamental laws — e.g. controlling the borders, ensuring that its revenue agents are not engaged in an unhinged political jihad with an eye toward stacking elections, etc. — while at the same time it seeks to regulate the minutiae of citizens’ lives with all the terrible moral ferocity of David Frum on a Tuesday afternoon espresso bender.
Meanwhile, Harry Reid -- who is more and more simply a monster -- continues making it clear that the Party of Government has personal interests, and it will stop at very little in vindicating those personal interests:
I note again that it is a scary thing when high-ranking officials of the Party of Government take challenges to their authority so personally.
You don't want a cop taking a small amount of attitude personally, and you sure as hell don't want the Majority Leader of the Senate doing so.
Or Sheldon Whitehorse of Rhode Island, who apparently took it quite personally indeed that Tea Party groups were seeking the same sort of tax status as myriad progressive groups.
Posted by: Ace at
01:39 PM
| Comments (203)
Post contains 691 words, total size 5 kb.
Posted by: unruly mob of Soddomites at April 18, 2014 01:41 PM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: Navycopjoe at April 18, 2014 01:42 PM (NKWFJ)
That was the original intent of the founders but it was destroyed with the advent of the progressive era in the early 1900s. It was aided and abetted by the 14th amendment which destroyed the idea of the States.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at April 18, 2014 01:42 PM (T2V/1)
Posted by: museisluse at April 18, 2014 01:43 PM (ngu15)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at April 18, 2014 01:44 PM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 18, 2014 01:44 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 18, 2014 01:45 PM (bitz6)
Posted by: museisluse at April 18, 2014 01:45 PM (ngu15)
Posted by: joeindc44 at April 18, 2014 01:47 PM (DTVYh)
Posted by: joeindc44 at April 18, 2014 01:48 PM (DTVYh)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 18, 2014 01:48 PM (84gbM)
Posted by: Lauren at April 18, 2014 01:48 PM (hFL/3)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 18, 2014 01:48 PM (bitz6)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 18, 2014 01:49 PM (84gbM)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 18, 2014 01:50 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: TexasJew at April 18, 2014 01:50 PM (U+u4A)
Posted by: at April 18, 2014 05:48 PM (hFL/3)
As I posted in the link (unreadable) this morning. They tried that shit once before and the Supreme Court squashed it. I seriously doubt that it would pass muster now since the court is a little more conservative now than it was then.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at April 18, 2014 01:50 PM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 18, 2014 01:51 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: TexasJew at April 18, 2014 01:52 PM (U+u4A)
Posted by: garrett at April 18, 2014 01:52 PM (KgFhV)
Posted by: SpongeBobSaget at April 18, 2014 01:52 PM (L02KD)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 18, 2014 01:53 PM (84gbM)
Posted by: visenjon at April 18, 2014 01:53 PM (VDovR)
Posted by: TexasJew at April 18, 2014 01:53 PM (U+u4A)
Posted by: Costanza Defense at April 18, 2014 01:53 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Soothsayer § at April 18, 2014 01:55 PM (9lyhM)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 18, 2014 01:55 PM (84gbM)
Posted by: Jmel at April 18, 2014 01:55 PM (cfFqn)
Posted by: MTF at April 18, 2014 01:55 PM (F58x4)
Posted by: Costanza Defense at April 18, 2014 01:56 PM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 18, 2014 01:56 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: Soothsayer § at April 18, 2014 01:56 PM (9lyhM)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 18, 2014 01:57 PM (84gbM)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 18, 2014 01:57 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: Boss Moss at April 18, 2014 01:59 PM (bitz6)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 18, 2014 01:59 PM (84gbM)
Posted by: Space Commander Clinton at April 18, 2014 02:00 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: kids burned alive by the ATF at April 18, 2014 02:00 PM (Ua6T/)
Posted by: MTF at April 18, 2014 05:55 PM (F58x4)
'...even at the expense of liberty for the people'? Seems to me those in power view the liberty of the people as an obstacle to be removed. After individual liberty is gone, presumably Utopia naturally follows.
Reminds me of something either Solzhenitsyn or Vaclev Havel wrote or said: 'The gulags were not an unhappy byproduct of the Soviet system. The gulags were the point.'
Posted by: troyriser at April 18, 2014 02:01 PM (2jF2B)
Posted by: Teresa in Fort Worth, TX (@Teresa_Koch) at April 18, 2014 02:01 PM (PZ6/M)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 18, 2014 02:02 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 18, 2014 02:02 PM (nzKvP)
Barky never did disclose who his Foreign Donors were...
So the 'full disclosure rule' doesn't even work...in the very instances it was designed to work on!
Posted by: wheatie at April 18, 2014 02:02 PM (fAjDo)
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 18, 2014 02:03 PM (84gbM)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 18, 2014 02:04 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 18, 2014 05:44 PM (nzKvP)"
----------
I know you Americans who aren't on the Left like your Christianity, which is one of many ways in which we disagree, but could you at least have some "Onward Christian Soldiers" Christianity and less "Turn the Other Cheek" Christianity? Meet me half-way, for crying out loud. Or lose the country. The choice is yours.
Posted by: Eternally-recurring Zombie Nietzsche at April 18, 2014 02:05 PM (QTyrZ)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 18, 2014 02:05 PM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Behind Enemy Lines at April 18, 2014 02:05 PM (thLL8)
Posted by: S. Muldoon at April 18, 2014 02:06 PM (MKpBT)
Posted by: Dan at April 18, 2014 02:06 PM (COpZ4)
Posted by: Behind Enemy Lines at April 18, 2014 02:06 PM (thLL8)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 18, 2014 02:06 PM (nzKvP)
Posted by: Eternally-recurring Zombie Nietzsche at April 18, 2014 02:07 PM (QTyrZ)
Posted by: --- at April 18, 2014 02:07 PM (MMC8r)
@ 51
And the thing I don't get is Mrs. Harry Reid. This good Mormon woman thinks she is getting into heaven? Her hubby is the money man for the Great Abortion Pimp aka Baraka Obama. All the federal monies for Obama's abortion agenda start with Sen Harry.
Posted by: visenjon at April 18, 2014 02:08 PM (VDovR)
Posted by: Dan at April 18, 2014 02:08 PM (COpZ4)
The compilation of an enemies list by the right, perhaps starting with a list of everyone working for the newspaper that published the lists of gun-owners and moving on from there, should really be a priority.
Or maybe I'm wrong and this isn't really a war....
But I'll bet the left has lists like that.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at April 18, 2014 02:09 PM (AC0lD)
Posted by: Piercello at April 18, 2014 02:10 PM (jJ97i)
Posted by: Lauren at April 18, 2014 02:12 PM (hFL/3)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 18, 2014 02:12 PM (fNl/7)
Posted by: Dan at April 18, 2014 02:12 PM (COpZ4)
I'm Jewish. What's your point?
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 18, 2014 06:06 PM (nzKvP)"
-------------
Certainly not anything anti-Jewish or anti-Semitic. Read section 251 of Beyond Good and Evil, where I rip the anti-Semites a new one for not letting the "Wandering Jew" finally find a home in Europe. My directive was aimed at incapacitating the Left by any means necessary, not the Jews. Just fucking go "blond beast" on them. It's either that or they do it on you. The Christianity mention was for the broader population of Americans, who seem to only adhere to a passive strand of Christianity and let the Left run over them (that is, where it isn't politicians letting the Left win because they sorta want the same things, even if they don't maybe want them quite as fast). For a Jewish American, it might be "More early Old Testament Fighting Judaism" and less "Woe is me I'm persecuted Judaism".
Posted by: Eternally-recurring Zombie Nietzsche at April 18, 2014 02:13 PM (QTyrZ)
Posted by: Dan at April 18, 2014 02:14 PM (COpZ4)
Note, some Government agencies are already there...
Posted by: Romeo13 at April 18, 2014 05:59 PM (84gbM)
Tammy Bruce was hectoring the homos for giving the moooooooooslim cab drivers in Cleveland a pass for not transporting them to the homo olympics while trying to put Christian bakeries and photographers out of bidness.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 18, 2014 02:14 PM (TklsO)
Posted by: grammie winger at April 18, 2014 02:14 PM (oMKp3)
@ 64
Dig up some clips of Claire Shipman from the early 90's on CNN and her then husband ( he worked there also). Before she was Mrs Jay Carney-barker she was married to some old silver haired geezer that could have been her grandpappy. If that is what constitutes having fun, then I am proud to be a humorless scold. At least I don't have creepy daddy issues (and a love for Marxism).
Posted by: visenjon at April 18, 2014 02:15 PM (VDovR)
Or eric holder who takes everything a non-black says personally and uses his high powered position to punish non-blacks and reward his friends.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 18, 2014 02:15 PM (BrAHD)
"Harry Reid -- who is more and more simply a monster..."
Prayers for Harry Reid
Harry Reid has been hospitalized after a car accident involving his motorcade. IÂ’m praying for a quick recovery for the Senate Majority Leader, and hope youÂ’ll all join me.
Oct 26, 2012 Ed Morrissey
"Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn!"
Posted by: Laurie David's Cervix at April 18, 2014 02:15 PM (kdS6q)
Posted by: Hairy Reed at April 18, 2014 02:15 PM (Aif/5)
Posted by: Y-not at April 18, 2014 02:15 PM (zDsvJ)
Posted by: RWC at April 18, 2014 02:15 PM (QeH9j)
Posted by: --- at April 18, 2014 02:17 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Dan at April 18, 2014 02:17 PM (COpZ4)
Having a sense of morality puts you at a disadvantage...when you are fighting an opponent who is not hindered by any such sense of morality.
This is something that the Left has taken advantage of, repeatedly.
Posted by: wheatie at April 18, 2014 02:17 PM (fAjDo)
Posted by: Zarathustra at April 18, 2014 02:18 PM (KgFhV)
I have tried to explain this before, but we need to rehabilitate the term bully.
people want to say it doesn't apply here, but it does. The libs are the kid on the top of the jungle gym pushing off everyone who gets close.
that's bullying no matter what the new speak people say.
Posted by: tsrblke (Phone) at April 18, 2014 02:18 PM (WQLkn)
The dream would be to take away the FCC Licenses of ABC, CBS and NBC et al...for illegal campaign contributions.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 18, 2014 02:18 PM (BrAHD)
Posted by: Costanza Defense at April 18, 2014 02:18 PM (ZPrif)
So I'm not exactly sure what your argument is here.
Posted by: grammie winger at April 18, 2014 06:14 PM (oMKp3)"
-----------------
You are correct, there is always the American "fighting" Christianity and you do fight well. It's the only form I respect. Closest thing to "Caesar with the soul of Christ", which is my ideal kind of man.
But, you've got to admit that what you're doing isn't working and maybe you need to get more of your passive brethren on your side. If the Gospel is really that powerful, shouldn't you be able to do it?
Posted by: Eternally-recurring Zombie Nietzsche at April 18, 2014 02:18 PM (QTyrZ)
Posted by: Darth Cobalt Shiva, Sith Lord at April 18, 2014 02:19 PM (OY/SZ)
Posted by: [/i]andycanuck[/b] at April 18, 2014 02:21 PM (hn5v5)
Posted by: grammie winger at April 18, 2014 06:14 PM (oMKp3)
Nietzsche wasn't opposed to the left anyway. He's as much a materialist as they were. Someone missed the point.
Posted by: tsrblke (Phone) at April 18, 2014 02:21 PM (WQLkn)
Posted by: grammie winger at April 18, 2014 02:22 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: Costanza Defense at April 18, 2014 02:22 PM (ZPrif)
Civil Cold War.
It's been going on for a while now. More people are starting to realize that.
Posted by: torquewrench at April 18, 2014 02:22 PM (noWW6)
Posted by: Eternally-recurring Zombie Nietzsche at April 18, 2014 02:22 PM (QTyrZ)
Would it be possible to create a system so that the politicians don't know from whom the donations came?
Donations go into something like a paypal account that you then designate who gets the money. You can show that you donated to politics, but not to whom.
Make it a crime to prove to a candidate that you gave them money.
Posted by: buzzsaw90 at April 18, 2014 02:23 PM (TfdkD)
Posted by: Eternally-recurring Zombie Nietzsche at April 18, 2014 06:07 PM (QTyrZ)
I doubt Jesus used a length of rope because guns hadn't been invented yet. If He chose, He could've shot laser beams from His eyes or stepped forward into time and brought back a boom box from the early Eighties that only played 'Afternoon Delight' by Starland Vocal Band, which would drive anyone from the Temple.
But that isn't really the point, is it? He was trying to teach them (and us), not kill them.
Posted by: troyriser at April 18, 2014 02:23 PM (2jF2B)
Of course, I also wanted the Republicans to go ape-shit on President Dumbass during the last election and wage war on the Democrats in every conceivable manner.
I might as well have wished for my unicorn.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at April 18, 2014 02:24 PM (AC0lD)
Posted by: RWC at April 18, 2014 06:15 PM (QeH9j)
Solid B+ imo
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 18, 2014 02:24 PM (TklsO)
Posted by: Eternally-recurring Zombie Nietzsche at April 18, 2014 06:22 PM (QTyrZ
Nietzsche or Aristotle, Benedict and Trotsky.
I am not unswayed by the description of how we are when we submit to baser instincts. However I do not take the is as an ought.
Posted by: tsrblke (Phone) at April 18, 2014 02:25 PM (WQLkn)
Posted by: Darth Cobalt Shiva, Sith Lord at April 18, 2014 02:25 PM (OY/SZ)
Yep!
Posted by: The Permanent Bipartisan Fusion Party at April 18, 2014 02:25 PM (noWW6)
Posted by: Buffalobob at April 18, 2014 02:25 PM (AuCeZ)
Posted by: iKant at April 18, 2014 02:26 PM (KgFhV)
Posted by: troyriser at April 18, 2014 06:23 PM (2jF2B)"
---------------------
If that is your interpretation of the Gospels, fine. I disagree. I think there is a reading of the Gospels that sort of implies that people are not put on Earth to endure tyranny at the hands of men, and that law overrides all other laws. I'm not going to quote chapter and verse to make the case, but the overall insistence on the dignity of the individual regardless of his station in life implies that human freedom is of paramount concern. When governments transgress against that freedom, they seek wrath. And they should get it.
Posted by: Eternally-recurring Zombie Nietzsche at April 18, 2014 02:26 PM (QTyrZ)
Posted by: blaster at April 18, 2014 02:27 PM (4+AaH)
Posted by: alexthechick - Here SMOD SMOD SMOD at April 18, 2014 02:27 PM (JACYy)
Posted by: thunderb at April 18, 2014 02:28 PM (Pc0ub)
I am not unswayed by the description of how we are when we submit to baser instincts. However I do not take the is as an ought.
Posted by: tsrblke (Phone) at April 18, 2014 06:25 PM (WQLkn)"
-----------------------
If you consider not "taking the is as an ought" and can live with the consequences, then you are fine.
Posted by: Eternally-recurring Zombie Nietzsche at April 18, 2014 02:28 PM (QTyrZ)
Posted by: Northernlurker at April 18, 2014 02:29 PM (shNkh)
Posted by: grammie winger at April 18, 2014 02:29 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: John Corzine at April 18, 2014 02:30 PM (KgFhV)
Posted by: alexthechick - Here SMOD SMOD SMOD at April 18, 2014 06:27 PM (JACYy)
I am still convinced ethics got me.fired from my ethics job.
The only reason to persist with the moral (intentional) coil is because there are eternal concerns to contemplate.
Posted by: tsrblke (Phone) at April 18, 2014 02:30 PM (WQLkn)
Posted by: garrett at April 18, 2014 02:31 PM (KgFhV)
Yeah, well I do and they do it in spades. Its purposeful, its planned and its constant.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 18, 2014 02:31 PM (BrAHD)
Posted by: Mike Hammer at April 18, 2014 02:31 PM (aDwsi)
Posted by: blaster at April 18, 2014 02:32 PM (4+AaH)
Posted by: forest at April 18, 2014 02:33 PM (stMuz)
Posted by: blaster at April 18, 2014 02:34 PM (4+AaH)
Posted by: --- at April 18, 2014 02:34 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: Decaf at April 18, 2014 02:34 PM (ilbeM)
The Obama years have been very very good for this class of investor
Posted by: thunderb at April 18, 2014 06:28 PM (Pc0ub)"
But doesn't the Left do their thing by hurting lower-level people who disagree with such shrieking frenzy that anyone higher-ranking just keeps quiet if they disagree with the Left. Sure, Rush and other high-profile names don't keep quiet and the Left rarely even scuffs them because they're big names, but people lower on the totem pole just stay quiet. Brendan Eich had just gotten to the level where he was both big enough to matter and small enough to take down, that's why he was targeted. That's where the Right fails, at least one of the places, they don't "pick a target, freeze it" and whatever else that blabbermouth Alinsky said, at the lower-level. That woman who spied on Joe the Plumber never got half the Alinsky treatment she deserved. Like I've been implying, you people are too nice.
Posted by: Eternally-recurring Zombie Nietzsche at April 18, 2014 02:34 PM (QTyrZ)
Posted by: Eternally-recurring Zombie Nietzsche at April 18, 2014 06:26 PM (QTyrZ)
You stated that, given His druthers, Christ would choose a gun over a length of rope to drive moneychangers from the Temple (he didn't drive out Pharisees, btw). I'm telling you your reasoning is flat-out wrong on that score. You sound as if you don't know Him very well. That can be addressed.
Further, you complain about the supposed pacifism of Christians, and would prefer a less turn-the-other-cheek approach. I frankly haven't seen the pacificistic approach you're talking about, at least not in the political sense. Most Americans, in fact, claim to be Christians of one sort or another. We fight when necessity dictates.
Actually, trying to discern your point at all is like trying to cut soup with a knife.
Posted by: troyriser at April 18, 2014 02:35 PM (2jF2B)
The fact that they can use some liberal white people to increase their power and their wealth does not disqualify what they do.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 18, 2014 02:36 PM (BrAHD)
Posted by: Behind Enemy Lines at April 18, 2014 02:36 PM (thLL8)
Posted by: bergerbilder at April 18, 2014 02:37 PM (8MjqI)
Posted by: mysteryman at April 18, 2014 02:37 PM (UOAdG)
Posted by: blaster at April 18, 2014 06:27 PM (4+AaH)
I think giving whitey shit is the only thing that gives their miserable piece of shit lives any meaning. I think its what drives them from the minute they get up to the minute they go hang upside down to sleep.
Posted by: Berserker-Dragonheads Division at April 18, 2014 02:37 PM (FMbng)
Posted by: blaster at April 18, 2014 02:37 PM (4+AaH)
Posted by: SE Pa Moron at April 18, 2014 06:34 PM (oGrEy)
Hey, easy there, I boxed amateur in my youth and...um...ah...what were we talking about?
Posted by: troyriser at April 18, 2014 02:37 PM (2jF2B)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/s][/i][/b][/s] at April 18, 2014 02:38 PM (2hTlI)
In an episcopal church. It suggests that the stunt was turned down by Catholic clergy.
Posted by: Decaf at April 18, 2014 06:34 PM (ilbeM)
Is there no depth to which my former church won't sink? I hope she gets pinworms doing this.
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 18, 2014 02:38 PM (TklsO)
Great post blaster. When I lived in America, I used to naturally have great respect for law enforcement.
But now, the entire system scares the crap out of me. Prosecutors and government agencies with comparatively unlimited resources that can punish anyone that steps out of line using any obscure law. That's a system that can't break down fast enough.
Posted by: Stateless Infidel at April 18, 2014 02:38 PM (AC0lD)
Posted by: Rev dr e buzz healthcare at April 18, 2014 02:38 PM (K2KRO)
126 - Local Story; Nothing To See; Move Along.
Matthew Sheppard? STOP THE PRESSES!!11!! NASH-UH-NALL NEWZ!!11!!
Posted by: OK, Thanks, Bye at April 18, 2014 02:39 PM (uopHF)
Posted by: --- at April 18, 2014 02:39 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: grammie winger at April 18, 2014 02:40 PM (oMKp3)
Posted by: BignJames at April 18, 2014 02:41 PM (ZNQKl)
We'll have to agree to disagree then, I think race IS the primary driver for those two.
I will state tho that liberals in the past used race to further liberalism, those two have switched it around.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 18, 2014 02:41 PM (BrAHD)
Posted by: thunderb at April 18, 2014 02:41 PM (Pc0ub)
My point is why are you constantly losing? Or, if you are not losing, why do the comments here always seem to refer to a feeling of losing? Is it that every political faction in America thinks it's losing and you reflect that general trend? I take a more philosophical stance toward America and don't really care if it continues to exist or not, but it is a fascinating case study in a people letting its country slip into the hands of an ideology diametrically-opposed to its foundation. That happens a lot, it just hadn't happened here yet, until now. Aren't you in the least bit curious in doing a post-mortem?
Posted by: Eternally-recurring Zombie Nietzsche at April 18, 2014 02:42 PM (QTyrZ)
I like to think of Jesus not as a pacifist, but a passive-aggressive agitator. Not in the Obama mold, which is progressive-agressive®.
Posted by: SE Pa Moron at April 18, 2014 06:42 PM (oGrEy)"
---------------
There was a reason why people feared Jesus would lead a revolution. In a world as violent as his, do you really think they feared a Gandhi-like revolution?
Posted by: Eternally-recurring Zombie Nietzsche at April 18, 2014 02:43 PM (QTyrZ)
Posted by: boulder t'hobo at April 18, 2014 02:44 PM (30eLQ)
Posted by: bonhomme[/i][/b][/s][/i][/b][/s] at April 18, 2014 02:45 PM (2hTlI)
Posted by: ArmChair in sin at April 18, 2014 02:45 PM (BnOvL)
Posted by: boulder t'hobo at April 18, 2014 02:46 PM (30eLQ)
There's no excuse for Harry Reid.
He's an exemplar of Boss Hogg like rural county execs/supervisors who throw their weight around and turn local small government into their personal fiefdom.
They're to be found all over the country (probably all over the world) and that he has the added fillip of being the most powerful Senator just adds to the frisson that his declaration that "this isn't over" and "they're domestic terrorists" is filled with portent of bad things happening to those at the center of the controversy.
He should be removed from office as soon as possible. He has a look of cruelty and that he enjoys making people fear him and having his threats carried out. The typical small town tyrant/bully.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Waiting For SMODOT) at April 18, 2014 02:47 PM (JS0vr)
Posted by: Eternally-recurring Zombie Nietzsche at April 18, 2014 06:42 PM (QTyrZ)
It ain't over yet. We ain't over yet.
Posted by: troyriser at April 18, 2014 02:47 PM (2jF2B)
Posted by: Senator John McCain [/i] [/b] at April 18, 2014 02:48 PM (5ikDv)
Posted by: Stu-22 at April 18, 2014 02:49 PM (KbrNh)
Posted by: thunderb at April 18, 2014 02:49 PM (Pc0ub)
Posted by: Blanco Basura at April 18, 2014 02:50 PM (0AKks)
Posted by: --- at April 18, 2014 02:50 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: booger at April 18, 2014 02:51 PM (xRDdL)
This seems newsworthy:
Poland and the United States will announce next week the deployment of U.S. ground forces to Poland as part of an expansion of NATO presence in Central and Eastern Europe in response to events in Ukraine. That was the word from Poland’s defense minister, Tomasz Siemoniak, who visited The Post Friday after meeting with Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel at the Pentagon on Thursday.”
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 18, 2014 02:53 PM (BrAHD)
Posted by: Arthur Cognomen at April 18, 2014 02:53 PM (RwwCT)
Posted by: --- at April 18, 2014 02:53 PM (MMC8r)
Maybe Tea Partiers should fight back, maybe publish Lois Lerners home address for picketing or something. I think sometimes liberals see their tactics use against them and the stop it or reduce it.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 18, 2014 02:55 PM (BrAHD)
Posted by: --- at April 18, 2014 02:55 PM (MMC8r)
Being a modern liberal means not besting your opponentÂ’s view but delegitimizing it. And having the power to do it.
Posted by: CJ at April 18, 2014 02:57 PM (jbdp1)
Posted by: Comanche Voter at April 18, 2014 02:58 PM (wdHk6)
Posted by: Buzzion at April 18, 2014 02:58 PM (LI48c)
not apologizing everytime a feminist gets upset"
Well, I'll believe the right is taking this seriously when I stop reading mewling arguments like "We're better than that," and "Using their methods makes us just as bad as they are." And yes, I do mean Ace (Sandra Fluke, anyone?) among others.
Posted by: Dr. Mabuse at April 18, 2014 02:59 PM (FkH4y)
Posted by: booger at April 18, 2014 06:51 PM (xRDdL)
With Poppin' Fresh on our side, it's like being down a gazillion runs in the bottom of the ninth and some dorkus maximus in the dugout saying "In fairness, we can still win this".
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 18, 2014 03:02 PM (TklsO)
Also, wrt politicians taking things "personally", did you hear the one today about the mayor of Peoria, IL?? He actually had the cops go after a guy who had a parody account on twitter -- they confiscated his property over it!
Posted by: Aslan's Girl at April 18, 2014 03:03 PM (KL49F)
Posted by: --- at April 18, 2014 03:04 PM (MMC8r)
Posted by: bergerbilder at April 18, 2014 03:06 PM (8MjqI)
I know the Democrats are evil, it's why I am GOP....
I am tired of the GOP being feckless against evil.
Posted by: sven10077 at April 18, 2014 03:07 PM (TE35l)
Posted by: sven10077 at April 18, 2014 03:10 PM (TE35l)
Posted by: Regular Guy at April 18, 2014 03:12 PM (N3Al8)
Posted by: bergerbilder at April 18, 2014 03:13 PM (8MjqI)
Posted by: garrett at April 18, 2014 03:14 PM (KgFhV)
Posted by: thunderb at April 18, 2014 03:14 PM (Pc0ub)
Posted by: Samuel_Adams at April 18, 2014 03:15 PM (Zz48T)
It all makes sense...when you understand that Barky was never a 'Community Organizer'.
He was an Agitator.
The Organizers brought him in to stir up crowds.
Barky couldn't organize a pissing match.
We are being Provoked.
We are being pushed and provoked on a daily basis.
Bullying...is another word for this.
They want people to become violent, so they can use the full brutal force of their powers against us.
The reason why the Bundy Ranch standoff sticks in their craws...is that it was basically 'passive resistance' that won the day.
Yes, some of the supporters and cowboys had arms with them...
But they didn't use them.
And the government goons were far more heavily armed than the citizen-supporters were.
This is why they backed down.
They knew that it would be seen as 'overkill' if they fired first.
When you lose your temper with someone who is bullying you...the bully usually wins.
Barky and Holder are like the bullies in school, who would start shit and then go..."What! I didn't do anything."
So I guess what I'm saying is, we should stay frosty and not give them what they want.
Posted by: wheatie at April 18, 2014 03:15 PM (fAjDo)
However Nothing Says Lovin' Like Ed Morrissey poppin' out of your oven all fresh and warm though....
Posted by: sven10077 at April 18, 2014 03:16 PM (TE35l)
Posted by: sven10077 at April 18, 2014 07:13 PM (TE35l)
It would not surprise me if the Bundy travesty is the Ft.Sumter of our times. and yes FU to HR...
Posted by: Regular Guy at April 18, 2014 03:17 PM (N3Al8)
Maybe, I can't help but wonder if the better answer is to give them 18 tons of shit and watch them dig for the pony in there.
Posted by: sven10077 at April 18, 2014 03:17 PM (TE35l)
It wasn't just Clinton.
A lot of the "responsible moderate GOP", the Dick Lugar bunch, were also foursquare behind that bad deal.
Posted by: torquewrench at April 18, 2014 03:17 PM (noWW6)
We need more Breitbarts, more happy warriors who are not afraid to laugh at the outraged mobs. Don't be angry, don't be vindictive, but never stop laughing at them.
How ya feeling, sven?
Posted by: kartoffel at April 18, 2014 03:17 PM (sWwJZ)
I'm fine actually.
Wife was on leave this week to spend time with lad and I....
I miss Breitbart, and the movement misses him-of course unlike the GOP "Happy Warrior" was not about ignoring evil....
mock it, laugh at it....but call it what it is.
Posted by: sven10077 at April 18, 2014 03:19 PM (TE35l)
Posted by: garrett at April 18, 2014 03:20 PM (KgFhV)
Posted by: garrett at April 18, 2014 03:22 PM (KgFhV)
Buzzion it was a tough answer, just like contra what the left tells you Jesus was not a wimp and he said "sell your cloak and get a sword"...
Plenty of Roman troops were Christian soldiers.
Posted by: sven10077 at April 18, 2014 03:23 PM (TE35l)
187...mock it, laugh at it....but call it what it is.
Exactly, sven.
And also...shine a giant flashlight on their dirty deeds.
Glad you're feeling better.
Posted by: wheatie at April 18, 2014 03:23 PM (fAjDo)
Good to hear my opinion vindicated by others.
Fat little prick banned me because I had the temerity to comment on how the site wasn't as good as it was before Town Haul took over.
And he did a douchebag move of berating me for my comment publicly AFTER he had banned my from commenting so that I couldn't retort back in explanation of what I had said.
Fat marshmallow bald hair cheapshot douche.
I hope he curls up every night in a ball whimpering over his lost soul.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Waiting For SMODOT) at April 18, 2014 03:31 PM (JS0vr)
194...I disagree. When you throw that punch to the nose of the bully his body automatically reacts. His eyes fill with tears, his nose begins to bleed. Any onlooker realizes that the bully is merely mortal.
Posted by: SE Pa Moron
-----------
This works...when the bully is on equal footing with you, with respect to having Power over you.
What if the bully is your Boss?
Or what if the bully is a Police Force?
And what if the bully has the full backing of the media, which covers up the bullying?
You have to take a different tact, as far as confronting them.
Posted by: wheatie at April 18, 2014 03:32 PM (fAjDo)
Posted by: bergerbilder at April 18, 2014 03:32 PM (8MjqI)
Posted by: Madamex at April 18, 2014 03:33 PM (vaWdD)
That started with Affirmative Action.
Then the Feminists got on the gravy train.
And it's been downhill ever since.
White redneck males are the last non victims in the country.
Every one else has their day or week or month and their own Office of Boo Hoo My Feelings Got Hurt Mommy to go beat up on whoever said something they didn't like.
Only the Government never responds fast enough so the victims started taking the quasi-law into their quasi-hands and boom instant vigilantes.
Ready to pile on at a moment's notice or even whiff of butt hurt by one of their own or other special snow flake.
George Patton would have a sprained wrist by now slapping all the bitches we've spawned.
Posted by: Bitter Clinger and All That (Waiting For SMODOT) at April 18, 2014 03:39 PM (JS0vr)
Posted by: Madamex at April 18, 2014 03:40 PM (vaWdD)
Posted by: In the bunker at April 18, 2014 04:02 PM (lFQfB)
Posted by: Brewdog at April 18, 2014 04:26 PM (TZVis)
Posted by: hardcore at April 18, 2014 05:07 PM (E1Ihc)
Posted by: YourMomKeepsTexting at April 18, 2014 05:27 PM (Uug4p)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.6227 seconds, 331 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: OK, Thanks, Bye at April 18, 2014 01:41 PM (uopHF)