April 14, 2014
— Ace This isn't much of a surprise to anyone paying attention, except to the extent a member of the media elite is willing to admit what the non-media-elite have known for a decade.
Gall said she first had the realization that Pakistan was fueling the insurgency in Afghanistan “very soon” after the Sept. 11 attacks.“I went to Quetta and found Taliban resting up there and regrouping,” she said. “They had assistance, some of them talked about being forced and threatened and told to go in and fight the Americans … and when you're there, on the ground, seeing every bombing, the suicide bombing had started, the insurgency that grew, and you investigate where it's coming from, it kept leading back to Pakistan.”
Gall said that Pakistan’s leaders, and especially former President Pervez Musharraf, were “very clever” and tricked the United States into believing that Pakistan was an ally.
“I think the politicians, not all of them, but the diplomats … it took ages for them to understand that actually the persuasion wasn't working; the engagement wasn't bringing them on board; they were actually double dealing,” she said. “And now diplomats will tell you very plainly, ‘Yes, Musharraf was double dealing.’”
She makes the not-at-all-controversial claim that the ISI knew where bin Ladin was and was in fact hiding him, and are currently performing the same service for Al Zawahiri.
Posted by: Ace at
09:15 AM
| Comments (205)
Post contains 255 words, total size 2 kb.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 14, 2014 09:17 AM (hUf/y)
Posted by: Inspector Cussword at April 14, 2014 09:17 AM (Qp0nB)
Posted by: artisanal 'ette at April 14, 2014 09:18 AM (IXrOn)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 14, 2014 09:18 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at April 14, 2014 09:18 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: The Obvious Sock at April 14, 2014 09:19 AM (q+zA9)
Posted by: Gristle Encased Head at April 14, 2014 09:19 AM (+lsX1)
Posted by: BCochran1981 at April 14, 2014 09:19 AM (/Dico)
Do any of the NYT Geniuses remember who bankrolled the Taliban when they started?
And who gave the Taliban diplomatic recognition?
Posted by: rd at April 14, 2014 09:19 AM (D+lxs)
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 14, 2014 01:17 PM (hUf/y)
Saudi is our friend yo
Posted by: George Bush at April 14, 2014 09:20 AM (q+zA9)
Posted by: brainpimp at April 14, 2014 09:20 AM (d1LCL)
Posted by: Kreplach at April 14, 2014 09:20 AM (HJcb1)
Posted by: Federick Forrest at April 14, 2014 09:20 AM (JKNRq)
THIS.
But if you live in the hermetically sealed bubble of the liberal imagination, you can't pretend that's not true.
Posted by: Sean Bannion [/i][/s][/u][/b] at April 14, 2014 09:20 AM (sbV1u)
Posted by: sock_rat_eez at April 14, 2014 09:20 AM (GXWXg)
Posted by: LFW - Honorary Pointy-Eared Vulcan at April 14, 2014 09:20 AM (F26eZ)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 14, 2014 09:20 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: joncelli at April 14, 2014 09:20 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 14, 2014 09:21 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Cicero (@cicero) at April 14, 2014 09:21 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at April 14, 2014 09:22 AM (PYAXX)
Now we have to figure what they're up to.
Posted by: Kreplach at April 14, 2014 01:20 PM (HJcb1)
Bambi didn't like being dissed by the Saudis? Wants to get in some verbal jabs before the withdrawal? Doesn't matter. The Pakis played us.
Posted by: joncelli at April 14, 2014 09:23 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: Gmac-Pondering the coming implosion, and hoping its 404care at April 14, 2014 09:23 AM (baiNQ)
Posted by: NYT Reporter at April 14, 2014 09:23 AM (ZPrif)
As Ace said, this has been a "Well, no duh," for most of us for some time. Pakistan had cultivated the Taliban in order to increase its strategic depth in its confrontations with India. That the Taliban riled up the USA in 2001 probably caused a lot of cursing in Islamabad. Pakistan was not going to lose its strategic depth without a fight, hence the double-dealing.
Cultivating India would, I think, be a much better thing to do, but hey - I'm not an expert like the people in Foggy Bottom. Why on earth would I want to have a large regional power putting the pressure on Pakistan and keeping the attention of the Taliban closer to home? Whatever good would that do?
Posted by: Mikey NTH - Days of Rage Sale at the Outrage Outlet! at April 14, 2014 09:23 AM (hLRSq)
Posted by: boulder t'hobo at April 14, 2014 09:24 AM (6mYGI)
Posted by: Chris Vaughn at April 14, 2014 09:24 AM (h+2SD)
Posted by: Typical low info Democrat at April 14, 2014 09:24 AM (Xv7f/)
Posted by: joncelli at April 14, 2014 09:24 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: AllenG (DedicatedTenther) Ah, F It. at April 14, 2014 09:25 AM (PYAXX)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 14, 2014 09:25 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: NYT Reporter at April 14, 2014 09:25 AM (ZPrif)
Oh FFS. As unimpressive as the bulk of Beltway/State Dept./intel types are, I don't think anyone important ever thought for one second that Pakistan was anything more than the perfect composite of the region - i.e., an entity you were forced to deal with, so you did, and variously you bribed it, tried to penetrate it, killed its proxies, worked with some of it to kill other enemies, and on and on.
So many here (and outside) here seem to fall in love with, or become obsessively hostile to, foreign entities. No need for this, it is not rational or smart. No. Better to view every other power/entity/group of people clearly, plainly, with all their contradictory elements.
The "wrong" enemy? There is no "wrong" enemy. There's just a mix, a balance, an emphasis, a set of tactics that varies over time and circumstances. Thus, the vile menacing USSR of Stalin is something you support to the point of sacrificing merchant marine crews and significant precious military production so that ..... they help defeat the CURRENT "right" enemy, Nazi Germany.
Posted by: non-purist at April 14, 2014 09:25 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: Mr. Moo Moo at April 14, 2014 09:25 AM (0LHZx)
Posted by: Chaos the Other Dark Meat at April 14, 2014 09:25 AM (oDCMR)
At one time, Pakistan (along with many other nations) was a rising nation, with an expanding productive middle class. You can see pictures from the 60's and 70's of women walking in public (without a male escort) with their faces showing. Women working in public.
"Then they went full Islamic. You never go full Islamic."
Posted by: rd at April 14, 2014 09:26 AM (D+lxs)
Posted by: Larsen E. Whipsnade at April 14, 2014 09:26 AM (rXcBX)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at April 14, 2014 09:26 AM (JFUyc)
Posted by: NY TIMES at April 14, 2014 09:26 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 14, 2014 01:25 PM (t3UFN)
Just wait till Big Homo figures out islamic ideaology....
Posted by: The Obvious Sock at April 14, 2014 09:26 AM (q+zA9)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 14, 2014 01:25 PM (t3UFN)
Just like in the United States!
Posted by: Wymyn's Studies Major at April 14, 2014 09:26 AM (DrWcr)
Posted by: Colon Powell at April 14, 2014 09:26 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: boulder t'hobo at April 14, 2014 09:26 AM (6mYGI)
Posted by: Gmac-Pondering the coming implosion, and hoping its 404care at April 14, 2014 09:27 AM (baiNQ)
Posted by: The New York Times at April 14, 2014 09:28 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: grammie winger at April 14, 2014 09:28 AM (oMKp3)
Posted by: Captain Hate at April 14, 2014 09:28 AM (/OMpS)
Posted by: Memories at April 14, 2014 09:28 AM (6x2lr)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 14, 2014 09:28 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: boulder t'hobo at April 14, 2014 01:26 PM (6mYGI)
Is there a real chance of that?
Posted by: joncelli at April 14, 2014 09:28 AM (RD7QR)
Starting to think the KKK doesn't like both Jews *and* blacks. Still researching the anti-Catholic thing.
Posted by: NYT Reporter at April 14, 2014 01:25 PM (ZPrif)
Senator Byrd told me that the KKK was just a public spirited organization that supported progressive Democrat Policies.
Posted by: NYT Reporter #2 at April 14, 2014 09:29 AM (D+lxs)
Posted by: NYT Reporter at April 14, 2014 09:29 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Beyond Disgusted at April 14, 2014 09:30 AM (thLL8)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 14, 2014 09:30 AM (t3UFN)
I put this Gall chick in the same camp as Sheryl Attkisson: Fuck you. Hey, Sheryl, you let your stories be spiked BY THE FUCKING GOVERNMENT for 5 years, and now I am supposed to think you are a hero?
Gall: You KNEW this 10 years ago and just kept it to yourself? Why the Hell should I ever read anything you write.
Posted by: Sharkman at April 14, 2014 09:30 AM (TM1p8)
Posted by: grammie winger at April 14, 2014 09:30 AM (oMKp3)
Posted by: The New York Times at April 14, 2014 09:31 AM (8ZskC)
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at April 14, 2014 09:31 AM (JFUyc)
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/155443.php
and this:
http://ace.mu.nu/archives/155464.php
There was one about Pearl Harbor, but I can't find it.
Posted by: EC at April 14, 2014 09:31 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: Bevel Lemelisk at April 14, 2014 09:31 AM (S8y+1)
"Gall said that Pakistan’s leaders, and especially former President Pervez Musharraf, were “very clever” and tricked the United States into believing that Pakistan was an ally."
They didn't trick anyone, dumbass. They have NUKES! Of course we aren't going to do anything to them.
Posted by: Sharkman at April 14, 2014 09:31 AM (TM1p8)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 14, 2014 09:31 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: grammie winger at April 14, 2014 01:30 PM (oMKp3)
It was the opium, music and dancing.
Posted by: Oldsailors Poet Palin/Bolton 2016 at April 14, 2014 01:31 PM (JFUyc)
Well, that and the indoctrination at the madrass.
Posted by: joncelli at April 14, 2014 09:32 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: The Obvious Sock at April 14, 2014 01:26 PM (q+zA9)
-------------------------------------------
Get your labels straight. It's "Big Anus".
Posted by: Soona at April 14, 2014 09:32 AM (k+3vt)
Posted by: SH at April 14, 2014 09:32 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: RWC at April 14, 2014 09:32 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: ejo at April 14, 2014 09:32 AM (GXvSO)
Posted by: boulder t'hobo at April 14, 2014 09:32 AM (6mYGI)
China. Russia. Pakistan. Iran. Each has an interest in undermining US influence in Asia and the Middle East, and all have been busily working to achieve that end, sometimes (but not always) in collusion and coordination with the others. Singling out Pakistan doesn't capture the bigger strategic picture.
Besides, I suspect former President Bush knew Musharrif was a double-dealing weasel but bent him to our will--at least temporarily--so that we would have the access to Afghanistan we needed to fight the Taliban. Had Bush known Pakistan was sheltering Bin Laden, I suspect he would've used a precision bombing strike and then dared Pakistan to do something about it.
President Obama, on the other hand, probably thinks he can use his charisma, force of personality, and sheer messianic awesomeness to dissusade the Pakistanis from supporting the Taliban and sheltering Zawahiri.
If memory serves, Romney brought up Pakistani double-dealing in the last election. The press (and the Obama campaign) ridiculed him for it.
Posted by: troyriser at April 14, 2014 09:33 AM (gNlvW)
Did you know women can;t drive in Saudia Arabia! I know, cray cray right? You can't make this stuff up. And what's with the death penalties for gays?! Mind blown, you guys!
Posted by: NYT Reporter, doing actual investigative journalism work at April 14, 2014 09:33 AM (yRwC8)
Posted by: grammie winger at April 14, 2014 09:33 AM (oMKp3)
And just how were we supposed to support any significant military operations in A'stan without renting/"befriending"/"cooperating" with Pakistan? Geography and logistics are a b***h.
There has been some, rather bizarre, echoing on "the right" of the false pacifist/pro-fascist whining about drone zapping. Leaving that aside, where do people think we could possibly be getting the sort of fine-grained human intel needed to hit a particular hut at a particular time & day, if we weren't (variously) getting cooperation from, and penetrating/turning/exploiting, Paki intel assets and personnel? I of course do not know, but I find it impossible to imagine that a lot of the US actions in the Northwest Frontier Province etc. have proceeded without Paki input. These areas are simply immutably non-permissive environments for most of our humint activities.
So - Pakistan an enemy? Well, the Paki elites are among the most loathsome anti-American human garbage you'll ever meet (and that has, tragically, become a stiff competition, as you all know). I mean esp. the westernized folks, not the local elites. I nearly tossed a Paki World Bank POS off the nice rooftop cafe when it made outrageous comments about 9/11, shortly after the event. So yeah, those vermin could be eliminated to the great improvement of the planet.
The incredibly warm, tough, rather brave Paki guys who staffed a lot of the support operations in Iraq? I'll take them over 80% of the US populace, any day.
Posted by: non-purist at April 14, 2014 09:33 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 14, 2014 09:33 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Trimegistus at April 14, 2014 09:34 AM (Zp8Kp)
Posted by: ManWithNoParty at April 14, 2014 09:34 AM (ojnk6)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 14, 2014 09:35 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: kbdabear at April 14, 2014 09:35 AM (aTXUx)
Posted by: Fritz at April 14, 2014 09:35 AM (oJUxt)
Posted by: The Jackhole at April 14, 2014 09:35 AM (nTgAI)
Posted by: Sharkman at April 14, 2014 01:31 PM (TM1p
No? We violated the shit out of their airspace and killed Bin Laden two miles away from their premiere military academy. Nukes or not, that was a fairly provocative act.
Posted by: troyriser at April 14, 2014 09:35 AM (gNlvW)
Posted by: Angel with a sword at April 14, 2014 09:36 AM (hpgw1)
I don't want to be bossy, but Pakistan is our friend and ally.
*puts on headscarf for muzzie compliance*
Posted by: Shrillary Clinton at April 14, 2014 09:36 AM (hUf/y)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 14, 2014 09:37 AM (ZPrif)
fing idiots...but we're still going to give them all those M-RAPS, right?
Posted by: redc1c4 at April 14, 2014 09:37 AM (q+fqH)
Posted by: Scanner Dan at April 14, 2014 09:38 AM (Dm8Bg)
Posted by: Rowan Atkinson at April 14, 2014 09:38 AM (8c12T)
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 14, 2014 09:38 AM (ZPrif)
Posted by: Trimegistus at April 14, 2014 01:34 PM (Zp8Kp)
No, that's what I'm for!!!
Posted by: KKK killer at April 14, 2014 09:38 AM (yRwC8)
Pakistan has always been a fairweather ally at best. If the United States was genuninely "tricked" into believing that the Pakis were anything more than opportunistic double-dealers then our intelligence, diplomatic and military officials should all be strung up by the heels and pelted with rotten fruit.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 14, 2014 09:38 AM (4df7R)
#facepalm MT @20committee: Visual = terrible / MT @jaketapper Russians: DCIA in UKR over the weekend./ CIA: can't confirm. / WH: we confirm.
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 14, 2014 01:35 PM (ZPrif)
Why the ever-loving shit are they CONFIRMING this? Jeezy friggin' Creezy!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 14, 2014 09:39 AM (4df7R)
..
White House confirms CIA chief was in Kiev on Saturday.
Tom Nichols @TheWarRoom_Tom
#facepalm MT @20committee: Visual = terrible / MT @jaketapper Russians: DCIA in UKR over the weekend./ CIA: can't confirm. / WH: we confirm.
Posted by: Flatbush Joe at April 14, 2014 01:35 PM (ZPrif)
Sigh. It would be difficult to hide but they didn't need to second-guess CIA. These guys just can't resist the urge to cleat their own dicks.
Posted by: joncelli at April 14, 2014 09:39 AM (RD7QR)
Get your labels straight. It's "Big Anus".
Actually, management politely asked the horde to refrain from using that.
Posted by: Frumious Bandersnatch at April 14, 2014 09:39 AM (JtwS4)
Posted by: polynikes at April 14, 2014 09:39 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: Lizzy at April 14, 2014 09:40 AM (IdOTf)
Posted by: Sharkman at April 14, 2014 01:31 PM (TM1p
No? We violated the shit out of their airspace and killed Bin Laden two miles away from their premiere military academy. Nukes or not, that was a fairly provocative act.
Posted by: troyriser at April 14, 2014 01:35 PM (gNlvW)
My point remains. We had to sneak in to kill OBL, rather than receiving his head on a plate about 2 months after 9/11, as we would have had Pakistan not had nukes, and wasn't actually the enemy. And if Pakistan didn't have one its fellow-travelers doing such a bang-up job of fucking this country up beyond all possibility of redemption from his seat at the Resolute Desk, they might just have responded to our killing OBL with something more than a grin because they are defeating us from within without having to do shit.
Posted by: Sharkman at April 14, 2014 09:40 AM (TM1p8)
Posted by: Soona at April 14, 2014 09:40 AM (k+3vt)
It seems it took a catastrophic failure of a thermometer to correct Seattle's problem -- a problem that appears to have been around for several months, if not longer. Looking back at 2013, Seattle ran consistently about 0.5 to 1.0 degrees warmer with respect to its average than Olympia (i.e., if Olympia reported a month about a half degree above normal, Seattle was 1-1.5 degrees above normal.)
... and it was so affordable
Posted by: unambiguiously Semi-anonymous at April 14, 2014 09:41 AM (e8kgV)
Posted by: JEM at April 14, 2014 09:41 AM (bipwv)
Now we have to figure what they're up to.
===============
Pretty easy.
It's "Blame Booooosh."
"If Bush had gone after Pakistan--like we all knew he should have--we wouldn't have the problems today."
This is laying the groundwork for another revision of history.
From the guys who brought you "Nobody believed Saddam had WMD" we're about to get "we have always said Pakistan is the problem in Afghanistan."
Posted by: RoyalOil at April 14, 2014 09:42 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: The Beaver at April 14, 2014 09:42 AM (PMGbu)
Posted by: Lizzy at April 14, 2014 09:43 AM (IdOTf)
Posted by: wooga at April 14, 2014 09:43 AM (Ba8Ag)
Posted by: NY TIMES at April 14, 2014 09:44 AM (t3UFN)
Posted by: ontherocks at April 14, 2014 09:44 AM (/v+1z)
>>> Why the ever-loving shit are they CONFIRMING this? Jeezy friggin' Creezy!
Most transparent administration EVAH !!
Posted by: McCool at April 14, 2014 09:45 AM (nCSwS)
Oh, and this goes along with the rest of the thread: in re the DCIA confirmation from the WH - these people are f***ing idiots, not suited for any jobs of any responsibility, much less national security and national leadership.
But you all knew that.
BTW, good work there, NYT Reporter sock, very funny.
Capt. Hate, excellent point on India. One of the many unsung foreign policy advances under Dubya was India. Sure, we had/have tremendous common interests, brought into sharp focus by the friskiness of global Islamic terrorism. But still. Given China's emergence and the Soviet collapse, there was little doubt India would be looking towards Washington as it had not since independence. But Dubya handled that tectonic shift very well. And, of course, this crew of Beltway sub-retards and worse has done their best to screw it up.
Though it really becomes difficult, as a matter of analysis, to disentangle the manifold disastrous implications and consequences of American weakness. Which is flamboyant and obvious now - but really became evident way back in 2005-ish. And that weakness does NOT reside mostly in these ridiculous lightweights in power ... but in the American people themselves (even among the moron horde, as demonstrated frequently).
Posted by: non-purist at April 14, 2014 09:45 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: Ibin Pharteen at April 14, 2014 09:45 AM (zL/eJ)
From some of the posts on this thread, I'm reading that some people suspect the NYT's sudden discovery of Pakistani double-dealing and perfidity is an attempt to wag the dog and draw attention away from domestic issues, which aren't going so well for the Obama Administration.
I disagree. There just happens to be a lot of bad news on both domestic and foreign policy fronts. Fortunately for the MSM and the Democrats, most of these problems can still successfully be blamed on Bush, so they've got that going for them.
Posted by: troyriser at April 14, 2014 09:45 AM (gNlvW)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 14, 2014 09:47 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Soothie at April 14, 2014 09:48 AM (9lyhM)
Posted by: RobM1981 at April 14, 2014 09:48 AM (zurJC)
Posted by: SH at April 14, 2014 09:48 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: Vito Corleone at April 14, 2014 09:48 AM (8MjqI)
It's "Blame Booooosh."
Yep. Especially when you've got the "elites" in the GOPe proclaiming that Jeb is THE CANDIDATE for 2016. Get that Bush Derangement Syndrome reheated and ready to go!
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 14, 2014 09:48 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Lizzy at April 14, 2014 09:48 AM (IdOTf)
Posted by: RWC at April 14, 2014 09:48 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: NYT and the rest of the MSM at April 14, 2014 09:49 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: ontherocks at April 14, 2014 09:49 AM (/v+1z)
Our own Caligula (Obama) would do something about the Pakistani's and their hatred of the US..
Our Naivete in this country is epidemic..
Posted by: Mitch Ryder at April 14, 2014 09:50 AM (Ypcwm)
Posted by: polynikes at April 14, 2014 09:50 AM (m2CN7)
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 14, 2014 09:50 AM (XUKZU)
-NY Times, c.2035
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 14, 2014 09:51 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: maddogg at April 14, 2014 09:51 AM (xWW96)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 14, 2014 09:52 AM (t3UFN)
Other than as an easy launch point for vicious satire, is the absurd statement by a NYT reporter that Pakistan "tricked" the US to be taken the least bit seriously?
Look, the intellectual firepower and practical intelligence of a huge portion of the career for. pol/nat. sec. establishment (NOT just the Obama cretins) is shockingly low. And has been. For a long time. (recall the "leaks" of idiotic opinions by "intel officials" under Bush, especially during the 15-month long "rush to war" in Iraq - ya know, actually fighting enemies of the US will .... create enemies!)
The UKR visit by DCIA is hilarious. Even doing it was stupid. Confirming it? We are so far past non-credible bad comedy in US foreign policy, words fail.
Posted by: non-purist at April 14, 2014 09:52 AM (afQnV)
Meant to say, NYT reporter comments are idiotic, our for. pol. establishment is often pathetic in its own right, but nobody was ever "tricked" into thinking Pakistan was anything more than a mess, and often a foe.
Posted by: non-purist at April 14, 2014 09:54 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: Citizen X at April 14, 2014 09:54 AM (7ObY1)
Posted by: non-purist at April 14, 2014 01:52 PM (afQnV)
Hence why the Russkies have no problem buzzing our Navy ships with their fighter planes, like Maverick buzzing the control tower in Top Gun. We are an unserious nation.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 14, 2014 09:54 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: SH at April 14, 2014 09:54 AM (gmeXX)
Posted by: navybrat at April 14, 2014 09:54 AM (JgC5a)
Posted by: RWC at April 14, 2014 09:55 AM (fWAjv)
Posted by: Cicero Kid at April 14, 2014 09:55 AM (Fp7JI)
Posted by: naturalfake at April 14, 2014 09:56 AM (0cMkb)
Posted by: SH at April 14, 2014 01:54 PM (gmeXX)
And even Israel, while our truest ally in that corner of the world, will, at the end of the day, be more concerned with their own self-interest than with their alliance to the United States; justifiably so. Any country allied with the United States at this point who isn't looking with worry at how we're handling the Ukraine situation is a silly country indeed.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 14, 2014 09:56 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: navybrat at April 14, 2014 01:54 PM (JgC5a)
It actually happened on Saturday night.
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 14, 2014 09:57 AM (4df7R)
Posted by: Nevergiveup at April 14, 2014 09:58 AM (t3UFN)
Look up Ahmad Shah Massoud. He told us before September 11, 2001 that the problem was Pakistan. Massoud was killed on September 9, 2001. He was one of the greatest fighters in Afghanistan and supported the West. He knew.
Posted by: Adirondack Patriot at April 14, 2014 09:58 AM (qXVP6)
When obama travelled to Pakistan as a young muslim student you think he would have picked up on a couple of things.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 14, 2014 09:59 AM (hUf/y)
Posted by: Durand at April 14, 2014 09:59 AM (iBISi)
Posted by: NY Times at April 14, 2014 09:59 AM (t3UFN)
The missile defense was to protect eastern Europe (Poland, Czech Republic).
Posted by: HR at April 14, 2014 09:59 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: navybrat at April 14, 2014 01:54 PM (JgC5a)
---------------------------------------------
We not care. We buzz all day long. We have the fun with American navy, dah?
Posted by: Bear in the cockpit at April 14, 2014 09:59 AM (k+3vt)
Posted by: 29Victor at April 14, 2014 09:59 AM (ES9R7)
When obama travelled to Pakistan as a young muslim student you think he would have picked up on a couple of things.
Posted by: Guy Mohawk at April 14, 2014 01:59 PM (hUf/y)
He picked up some hash and a muslim education and the ISI and the Saudis picked him up as an agent.
Posted by: joncelli at April 14, 2014 10:00 AM (RD7QR)
Posted by: gracepmc at April 14, 2014 10:00 AM (rznx3)
Oh, upthread someone had a funny comment about the first clue being "stan" in the name (of the country, Pakistan). Well done.
But to put on the nerd hat for a second, that's just a suffix/word root translating as "land" (like "Deutschland" would literally translate as "German Land"). For example, Armenia's name - in Armenian - is "Hayastan". And Armenia - while a solid Russian partner, now and forever, for good reasons of geography and the hostile/batshit crazy neighbors that surround them - is no hotbed of Islamism, to put it mildly. Nor, obviously, of anti-Americanism.
And the eggplants I saw there in the Yerevan downtown farmer's market one August in the 90s were the most purple, beautiful ones I've ever seen (sadly I'm not really into eggplant).
Posted by: non-purist at April 14, 2014 10:00 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: Daybrother at April 14, 2014 10:00 AM (sXPQf)
Posted by: Lizzy at April 14, 2014 10:01 AM (IdOTf)
Posted by: naturalfake at April 14, 2014 10:01 AM (0cMkb)
They're not an ally, at some point this becomes a ransom. If we're afraid they'll use their nuclear stockpile against the US, then we need to take the appropriate military action.
Posted by: McAdams at April 14, 2014 10:01 AM (K3mSM)
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 14, 2014 10:01 AM (XUKZU)
Posted by: Ibin Pharteen at April 14, 2014 10:02 AM (zL/eJ)
http://youtu.be/qSnYNquYVuA
I'm going to have to go with "staged". No girl would stay with a guy like that.
P.S. I like to scare my wife too, but I pay for it. Dearly.
Posted by: EC at April 14, 2014 10:02 AM (GQ8sn)
Posted by: SH at April 14, 2014 10:02 AM (gmeXX)
Ah, got it. The "yet" confused me.
Posted by: HR at April 14, 2014 10:03 AM (ZKzrr)
Posted by: RWC at April 14, 2014 10:03 AM (fWAjv)
"The difference," Obama explained, "is that the Pope likes Jesus and I don't."
Posted by: WalrusRex at April 14, 2014 02:01 PM (XUKZU)
doom; coming, it is. Soon
Posted by: Abdullah Abdullah ( don't let me Abos get loose, Lou ) at April 14, 2014 10:05 AM (JyjXt)
Posted by: MWR, Proud Tea(rrorist) Party Bossy Assault Hobbit [/s][/u][/i][/b] at April 14, 2014 10:05 AM (4df7R)
I think this is *the* argument against Iraq. Yes, it's got terrific strategic value, *if* you plan to use it. It's not clear Bush had any plans to, and we know it was a non-starter once TFG was elected.
One of the things W. did very very right in this regard was to strengthen our relationship with India, so of course Preznit Ladies Tee's been doing anything he can to blow that up.
Posted by: Ian S. at April 14, 2014 10:05 AM (B/VB5)
I do believe that Pakistan is at war with itself. There is an anti-India Islamic military-industrial complex that is training and supporting the Afghan Taliban, and Musharraf was front and center part of that. There is also a modernizing, Western-oriented faction that is currently running the government, at least until the military takes over again. The Pakistani Taliban certainly has ties to the Islamist militarists, and so there really isn't a lot of enthusiasm among the military to try to root them out. They would much rather go after the Baluchi separatists.
But to say "Pakistan" supports the Taliban and is the real enemy is too simplistic. It would be like saying the "USA" supports Obamacare, which clearly is not the case. The real enemy is the anti-India Islamist military-industrial complex in Pakistan, which is very powerful and sometimes, but not always, runs things. We should be more supportive of the current government, for example as it tries to put Musharraf and his cronies on trial for war crimes and corruption.
Posted by: Caesar North of the Rubicon at April 14, 2014 10:06 AM (HubSo)
Posted by: Abdullah Abdullah ( don't let me Abos get loose, Lou ) at April 14, 2014 10:07 AM (JyjXt)
Posted by: Soona at April 14, 2014 10:07 AM (k+3vt)
So this is news to the NYT, really.
Posted by: standfast24 at April 14, 2014 10:07 AM (wx/BY)
Posted by: Rowan Atkinson at April 14, 2014 10:08 AM (8c12T)
29Victor, not sure what Pakistan had to do with Iraq, period. Far more Paki citizens supporting Coalition forces as contractors than participating in enemy activities (Chechens, Syrians, and of course Pasdaran were the keys there).
And as to prolonging the war in Iraq - don't look beyond the US command and leadership for that. There was a reason why "the surge" worked so quickly, and so easily (by normal historical standards). Was never more than a matter of the US deciding, finally, to do something, and prevail, and ditch the absurd war college crap that had hobbled us for years. Some time ask me about the corps commander's final meeting with the reconstruction group, and what it showed about the unbelievable incompetence of senior US military leadership.
Posted by: non-purist at April 14, 2014 10:09 AM (afQnV)
Posted by: A_Nonny_Mouse at April 14, 2014 10:09 AM (bujSG)
My Musli...My Christian faith.
Posted by: B to the O at April 14, 2014 10:09 AM (5ikDv)
Posted by: standfast24 at April 14, 2014 10:12 AM (wx/BY)
Posted by: Pelosi Schmelosi at April 14, 2014 10:15 AM (jHf6U)
Posted by: IllTemperedCur at April 14, 2014 10:16 AM (TIIx5)
Posted by: bergerbilder at April 14, 2014 10:17 AM (8MjqI)
Posted by: Tom Servo at April 14, 2014 10:20 AM (8Fa5Z)
Posted by: Powderhouse Rules at April 14, 2014 10:31 AM (Xv7f/)
* - Remember that thing? The nightly news sure doesn't.
Posted by: Shoot Me at April 14, 2014 10:37 AM (EQcfE)
Posted by: Shoot Me at April 14, 2014 10:38 AM (EQcfE)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 14, 2014 10:49 AM (o3MSL)
Posted by: cool arrow at April 14, 2014 10:51 AM (7XKHI)
Posted by: joeindc44 at April 14, 2014 10:54 AM (DTVYh)
Posted by: Hrothgar at April 14, 2014 10:58 AM (o3MSL)
Posted by: Speller at April 14, 2014 11:31 AM (J74Py)
Posted by: Tattoo De Plane at April 14, 2014 11:43 AM (J7sV0)
Posted by: Bushslapper5.0 at April 14, 2014 11:46 AM (w45V0)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.421 seconds, 333 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: ManWithNoParty at April 14, 2014 09:16 AM (ojnk6)