March 30, 2014
— Open Blogger

"Hey, Isn't This Thing Supposed To have An Engine?"
Good morning morons and moronettes and welcome to AoSHQ's prestigious Sunday Morning Book Thread.
Every Moron Likes Free Books
...especially if they're pulp sci-fi books from the 50s. So I discovered this site here that specializes in what they call "off- trail" sci-fi, fantasy, and horror. The have a free section where it looks like they've adopted the Baen strategy of offering some of an author's work for free in the hopes that you will like it well enough to actually purchase other books.
A lot of the freebies are reprinted "pulp" authors from the 50s. And some of the titles are a real hoot:
The Man Who Saved The Universe [The Adventures Of Johnny Mayhem #1] by C.H Thames. (Look, any book with a main character named 'Johnny Mayhem' has got to be worth reading)
The Dream Girl [The Hilarious Adventures of Toffee #1] by Charles F. Myers. (OK, the title isn't much, but look at the cover art -- dude's obviously living the moron lifestyle)
Interplanetary Huntress by Arthur K. Barnes. The blurb for this one is great:
Science Fiction's first heroine! Out of print for more than 50 years! The action-packed exploits of Gerry Carlyle, Interplanetary Huntress, on assignment from the London Interplanetary Zoo to capture the rarest alien lifeforms in the solar system – and "bring 'em back alive." The only fly in the ointment of this intrepid woman is pilot Tommy Strike, who's just as determined to prove no woman is his superior. Their battles with the most fearsome of otherworldly critters are nothing compared to their battle with each other!
So check 'em out.
Gone With the Wind Prequel Coming
And the main character will be Mammy:
The Mitchell estate has authorized writer Donald McCaig to write a novel, titled “Ruth’s Journey” (Ruth is Mammy’s real name in this telling), that details how the character is brought to America as a slave and how she views the events of Mitchell’s original novel. McCaig’s novel “Rhett Butler’s People,” which was released in 2007 and explores the childhood and family history of “Wind” romantic hero Rhett, was one of two books previously authorized by the Mitchell estate, with author Alexandra Ripley’s “Scarlett” also approved.
Huh. I hadn't heard about these other prequels. I'm thinking they can't be good, but what do I know?
Ripped from the AOSHQ sidebar: I found this article from Smithsonian magazine that gives an interesting explanation of the origin and history of the 'at' sign.
Guy named Ray Tomlinson, who worked for a company contracted with the government to develop the ur-Internet, called Arpanet, was tasked with how to send messages from one guy at one computer to a different guy at a totally different comoputer. He needed a separator for the different elements that make up the mailbox address:
Tomlinson’s eyes fell on @, poised above?“P”?on his Model 33 teletype. “I was mostly looking for a symbol that wasn’t used much,” he told Smithsonian. “And there weren’t a lot of options—an exclamation point or a comma. I could have used an equal sign, but that wouldn’t have made much sense.” Tomlinson chose @—“probably saving it from going the way of the ‘cent’ sign on computer keyboards,” he says. Using his naming system, he sent himself an e-mail, which traveled from one teletype in his room, through Arpanet, and back to a different teletype in his room.
And speaking of vintage e-mail addresses, how many of you morons remember Compuserve's old octal-based e-mail addresses, i.e 73051.2224@compuserv.com
A Look Back
The Bookslut blog has an interesting idea, to wit: the Daphne Awards, which are explained this way:
If you look back at the books that won the Pulitzer or the National Book Award, it is always the wrong book. Book awards, for the most part, celebrate mediocrity. It takes decades for the reader to catch up to a genius book, it takes years away from hype, publicity teams, and favoritism to see that some books just aren't that good.
So they're going to be deciding what the best books are from 50 years ago. The first iteration of this contest will deal with books that were published in 1963.
Subsequent Bookslut posts (like this one) provided the 1963 candidates to chose from. Some of these books I've heard of, some I've haven't, and I'm sure all those choices will reflect their conventionally liberal sensibilities, but the underlying idea, that some things can be fully understood only after you think about them for a long time, is a basically conservative one.
Which is why we're not served well by the 24/7 news cycle. I've often thought that if we didn't hear about "current" events for days or weeks, we'd be better off. But when something big happens, like 9/11 or Katrina, or a school shooting, all the news channels spring into action and there's intense competition among them to get to the story first or report on an aspect of the story that no one else has thought of, so every little scrap of information or rumor gets pounced on and the result is that 95% of what goes out on the news broadcasts is crap. Sifting through all the available information, determining what's true and what's false, what's important and what's trivial, can take days, weeks or even longer, to properly assess.
There was a funny bit in the South Park 'Katrina' episode that went something like this:
"We hear that there's cannibalism in the Super Dome."
"Have you made any attempt to verify this story?"
"No, but that's what we're reporting."
It probably doesn't help matters that most reporters are liberals who've been taught by their liberal j-school profs to push a narrative rather than discover truth they might not agree with.
Whither Conservative Books?
Here is an interesting Buzzfeed piece on the diminishing of the conservative book market, and by 'interesting' I mean 'lacking any hard data or evidence.' When I first clicked on the link, I was expecting something like, "20 years ago, the conservative book market was x million dollars. But in 2011, it was x - y million dollars, and here is why this happened..." It's hard to accept something you don't want to be true, but I don't think that's the case here. I have no problem with the article itself, which is actually worth reading, it just didn't bring in any verifiable numbers to bolster its central argument.
But I agree with the quotes in the article about the "ghettoization" of conservative authors into conservative publishers not being a good thing. And this holds true in a wider sense. For example, I hated it in when free-market libertarian John Stossel jumped from ABC to Fox. I know why he did it (he thought the audiences at Fox would be greater than that of ABC's 20/20), and that's fine, but I think it's unfortunate he didn't remain where he was, inflicting pain everywhere he went at ABC, driving them bughouse crazy, because his very high ratings meant that they couldn't just dump him, as they no doubt really wanted. I remember him conversing with Barbara Walters after one of his 20/20 segments and the look on her face was like she was being forced to deal with some loathsome thing she couldn't avoid. Her extreme discomfort at having to listen to a view so utterly foreign to the comfortably fashionable socialist cocoon she lives in 24/7 is something we need a lot more of, only it won't happen any more. In fact, whatever Stossel says on his Fox business how, all they have to do now is scream 'FAUX NOISE!' and that's the end of that.
10 Famous Literary Characters Based on Real People
This article is a bit of light candy. It seems weird that there could have been a real Mrs. Havisham:
Potential Havisham #2: Elizabeth Parker. This Shropshire, England, woman was also jilted on her wedding day and became quite reclusive afterward. Dickins was known to visit Shropshire, and the fact that Miss ParkerÂ’s house was called Havisham Court seems like it must be more than coincidence.
Also, I had always thought the name Ford Prefect had to be a reference to something else, and it turns out to be true:
Douglas Adams once explained that his Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy alien had “skimped a bit on his preparatory research" of Earth and thought he was choosing an inconspicuous name for himself. Adams later explained further, saying that Prefect saw vehicles swarming the streets of our little planet and “had simply mistaken the dominant life form.” The Ford Prefect, by the way, was a British car produced from 1938-1961.
Moron Recommendations
A tool for writers: moronette lurker "TYV" emailed this week to recommend Twine, which she says is "an open-source program that helps you write Choose Your Own Adventure-style branching narratives. The finished product is an HTML file that runs in a browser." She offers her own story, Lore, as an example of what you can do with this writer's tool.
Books by Morons
Mark Huffman (author of Antediluvian) has written a series of holiday-themed short stories about a vampire who has made it a habit to prey on diabetics. Seriously. He can't get enough of that sweet, sweet taste of elevated glucose levels.
The first two, Sweet Tooth and Sweet Tooth: Lord of the Pies, are available for free. The others are 99 cents each.
They're fun reads, the main character is an interesting guy, and Mark really needs to develop the concept into a full-length novel.
___________
A couple of weeks ago, moron author David Dubrow released his first novel, The Blessed Man and the Witch, which the Amazon blurb calls
a paranormal thriller focusing on the end of the world. The first in a projected trilogy about a Biblical apocalypse, it addresses western occultism, angelic phenomena, demonic possession, and the slow dissolution of American society within a credible and original framework.
In addition, David has made the following offer:
I'd be happy to send free copies of the book in Kindle or PDF format to anyone willing to give it an honest review on a blog, Amazon, or Goodreads. Just email me and I'll send the book along.
Dave's e-mail address is:
davedauthor
and then the 'at' sigh.
The domain is, as pronounced, geemaledottcomm.
Dubrow has also written the Ultimate Guide to Surviving a Zombie Apocalypse under the nom de plume of F. Kim O'Neill.
___________
So that's all for this week. As always, book thread tips, suggestions, rumors, threats, and insults may be sent to OregonMuse, Proprietor, AoSHQ Book Thread, at aoshqbookthread, followed by the 'at' sign, and then 'G' mail, and then dot cee oh emm.
What have you all been reading this week? Hopefully something good, because, as I keep saying, life is too short to be reading lousy books.
Posted by: Open Blogger at
05:58 AM
| Comments (184)
Post contains 1829 words, total size 13 kb.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at March 30, 2014 06:01 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: MTF at March 30, 2014 06:04 AM (F58x4)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at March 30, 2014 06:06 AM (u8GsB)
Aubrey/Maturin is one of those rare series that I find are remain eminently re-readable.
Posted by: Hrothgar at March 30, 2014 06:11 AM (o3MSL)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at March 30, 2014 06:12 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Jean at March 30, 2014 06:13 AM (Aqvh6)
Posted by: rickl at March 30, 2014 06:14 AM (sdi6R)
Posted by: All Hail Eris at March 30, 2014 06:15 AM (QBm1P)
Posted by: Xenophon at March 30, 2014 06:15 AM (EJ2lo)
Interesting discussion of "do men really want to be free?"
How there's always been a significant number men who prefer life under someone's control and will eagerly go along with keeping all of man in cages in exchange for a slightly better life for themselves.
How the chance for survival for yourself and your family can make you a coward.
The FSA is definitely our vampire class. The Democrats are the camp guards and collaborators draining us dry to keep them fed because it means they get fresh fruit and meat on a regular basis.
That's the whole motivation for the Democrats--they take a sick sense of self-worth from keeping the poor stupid and poor; because that means they Democrats are better than the poor.
It's why they so gleefully jump on the "people of WalMart" stuff and mock poor Republicans in a way they'd never publicly speak of their own--they hate the poor, they despise the poor but they have to have the poor and have them kept down lest they lose their own station.
Posted by: RoyalOil at March 30, 2014 06:16 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: MTF at March 30, 2014 06:21 AM (F58x4)
I can overlook the Renaissance Popes' private lives; I can even disregard the nepotism, which was central to Rome prior to the Reformation.
What appalls me is the indifference & impotence of the Church in the face of the Turkish invasions. Mohammed II said, while he was murdering thousands of Christians at Otranto, that "my horse will soon be eating his oats from the altar in St. Peters."
It was no fault of the Church that this did not happen.
Posted by: mnw at March 30, 2014 06:24 AM (P+3u+)
Anyone read those?
The other book I picked up was the first book in "The Champions" series. Saw an ad on Insty, looked interesting, clicked over.
This is the description of the first book "Whitecoat."
"Since 1881, Britain, Canada and the United States have been colonizing another planet. Now it's 1940, and tensions between the world's Empires are mounting because the English-speaking nations enjoy exclusive control over a uniquely powerful resource: genetically-enhanced humans known as 'Champions'. Lady Alex Smith is the newest Champion, and her best friend Stephanie Shylock has joined the British Army so they can work together. Along with Sergeant Mike Strong, a veteran soldier with a colorful reputation, these two must follow in the footsteps of their famous parents, and save the world... perhaps both worlds."
Posted by: RoyalOil at March 30, 2014 06:24 AM (VjL9S)
Posted by: Secundus at March 30, 2014 06:32 AM (VVsnw)
Posted by: Adam at March 30, 2014 06:32 AM (Aif/5)
Posted by: BornLib at March 30, 2014 06:33 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at March 30, 2014 06:33 AM (zT0DN)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 30, 2014 06:34 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: mark at March 30, 2014 06:36 AM (CzkJm)
Posted by: BornLib at March 30, 2014 06:37 AM (zpNwC)
Oh man, I stumbled across the Johnny Mayehm books years and years ago whilst reading through the entire sci fi section of a little public library. So pulpy. So fantastic.
This week I read:
Shadow and Bone: Leigh Bardugo - This is a reread and it's even better the second time around. The "magic" system is actually based on manipulation of matter more so than, you know, magic. The reason I reread it is that it is very very peasant Russian and given current events, Russia is on my mind. The main country is called "Ravka" and it is clearly meant to be Russia. I have the next book in the series which for some reason I haven't read yet but I do highly recommend the first book. One of the things I liked is that you kind of want to slap Our Heroine for being a naive idiot but given her background she would be naive. It would have been more unrealistic for her to be well schooled in court manners and the like.
Singularity: Bill DeSmedt: Another reread mainly because of some discussions here at the HQ about gravity waves and the like. It's about Tunguska being caused by submicroscopic black hole slamming into the Earth and the realization that it's still here. Can you stop it? How do you stop it? Hey! I know! Let's turn it into a weapon! Very Clancy and Crichton like and the type of book that you will like if you like that type of book. Also has Russians as the bad guys.
Leviathan Wakes: James S.A. Corey: Finally got around to finishing the last 75 or so pages. I liked it but it is very very much two completely different stories and styles of writing slapped together. I want to read a series about the space noir adventures of Miller, I love me some Dashiell Hammett, but it did not work to have that story being told alongside a more conventional space opera work. Also, and it may be that it's because this is the first book in an on-going saga, but the mechanics of the MacGuffin made no sense. Don't get me wrong, it's well written and has some interesting ideas about how society will develop when near space colonization becomes real. It just didn't quite come together.
Rinkitink in Oz: L. Frank Baum: Yes, I'm an Oz geek. I love these books so much. I was very fortunate that when I was young my tiny local library had all the Oz books. Oz will always be magical to me.
Posted by: alexthechick - come for the Global Warming stay for the SMOD at March 30, 2014 06:38 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: BornLib at March 30, 2014 06:39 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Emile Antoon Khadaji at March 30, 2014 06:40 AM (CrJzY)
Posted by: Empire1 at March 30, 2014 06:40 AM (ZYGp2)
Posted by: Secundus at March 30, 2014 10:32 AM (VVsnw)
21 Definitely not "pulp" but a friend turned me onto "The Martian" by Andy Weir.
Posted by: mark at March 30, 2014 10:36 AM (CzkJm)
Oh yeah, The Martian has been a moron favorite for some time now.
Posted by: OregonMuse at March 30, 2014 06:40 AM (fTJ5O)
Posted by: Adam at March 30, 2014 06:41 AM (Aif/5)
Posted by: Epobirs at March 30, 2014 06:43 AM (bPxS6)
There is a belief in SF/F that the major publishers only want books that are politically "pure", as in they reflect the views of the liberal establishments the editors and publishers hold, and these are the books that are "pushed", in that they are given the most support in marketing, covers and reviews, to generate an impression that they are the best works in content and writing. The second thing claimed is that the houses also neglect mid-listers, and and authors that no matter their storytelling ability are not up to the party line. There are authors who claim that these types of books sometimes don't get marketed or even get shipped out at all - and this is logical if you are marketing division pushing the greatest 800 page blockbuster on...whatever, I dunno, assertive, pro-feminist ideals wymen who like to be tied up or whatever you may not have the budget for a book you don't believe in or might not give a good return on your intensive marketing treatment.
I do not have the background to tell if this is true or not, but I have noticed that the quality of the blockbuster is not as great as I remember it from my youth, I prefer older books to newer books, and the publishing houses are all complaining that no one reads their books anymore. And this is consistent with the idea that they are a bunch of clueless idealogues that are caught up in their own bubbles to such an extent that they cannot tell between good and bad books any more than they can tell good or bad marketing strategies, even if it they were staring financial disaster in the face
Posted by: Kindletot at March 30, 2014 06:43 AM (LRUgq)
Posted by: IrishEd at March 30, 2014 06:44 AM (bfm04)
Posted by: BornLib at March 30, 2014 06:48 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Adam at March 30, 2014 06:49 AM (Aif/5)
Now I will need to check the books out.
Posted by: typo dynamofo at March 30, 2014 06:49 AM (IVgIK)
Also read, on a lark, a book about that pesky vermin, Joe McGinnis, who'd been stalking the Palin family until he died and went to hell. I became aware, in some thread elsewhere while comparing notes on what a dickhole he was, about how Janet Malcolm wrote a book, "The Journalist and the Murderer", about what a shithead McGinnis was on misleading the subject of an earlier book, "Fatal Vision", before torpedoing him after his trial. Malcolm is a journalist so the book reads fairly quickly and she gets to her points very well while still admitting that there's some moral ambiguity in the role of somebody trying to get to the truth. McGinnis comes across as quite the cocksucker and dirtbag. The subject of the original trial comes off as naive and probably not a person who I would like, but it's not apparent that he was really guilty in the trial. The Fatal Vision book, rightly or otherwise, made him look very very guilty. One thing that came off rather strangely was William F Buckley's role in the subsequent libel trial as an expert witness for McGinnis. Malcolm doesn't interview him, for whatever reason, but it what she quotes from his testimony he doesn't come off very well. I ran hot and cold on WFB while admitting he's usually a good conservative voice; however he has a lot of fanboiz who have the mental capacity of BOR who like him because he uses big words imo. Anyway it was an interesting read.
Posted by: Captain Hate at March 30, 2014 06:49 AM (9uGT0)
Posted by: Zombie John Gotti at March 30, 2014 06:51 AM (zT0DN)
Posted by: BornLib at March 30, 2014 06:53 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 30, 2014 06:53 AM (tOkJB)
Doesn't matter. Their day is past. An author can generate plenty of sales at minimal cost by just reaching bloggers like Glenn Reynolds. Don't worry about dead tree print runs until after you've established the item as an e-book. Make the dead tree companies come to you.
Posted by: Epobirs at March 30, 2014 06:55 AM (bPxS6)
Posted by: Empire1 at March 30, 2014 06:55 AM (ZYGp2)
Posted by: All Hail Eris at March 30, 2014 06:57 AM (QBm1P)
Posted by: ExSnipe at March 30, 2014 06:59 AM (LKJt3)
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at March 30, 2014 06:59 AM (1htQa)
Posted by: Empire1 at March 30, 2014 07:00 AM (ZYGp2)
Posted by: Sgt. Mom at March 30, 2014 07:01 AM (Asjr7)
http://kck.st/1d3J9Re
It's almost funded too. A $5 pledge will get you the ebook version, $25 for the dead tree version. Posted by: BornLib at March 30, 2014 10:48 AM (zpNwC)
Ohhhh thank you! I liked Phoenix Rising quite a bit. Also, I'm fascinated that it isn't a deconstruction, it's an Ozverse adventure for grown ups. As someone who is, hmm, how to put this, not unfamiliar with working in the transformative literature field (that's the snotty term for fanfic), I understand the draw of creating your own work in a universe you love.
The story of The Wizard of Oz is an interesting one. Posted by: Ed Anger at March 30, 2014 10:53 AM (tOkJB)
Somewhere out there is a 90+ page paper I wrote that's a combination of lit crit and histortical review on the allegorical nature of The Wizard of Oz. My advisor for that admitted it took him a third read to realize that the point I was making was I don't care if it is or if it isn't, the Ozverse is a wonderful place no matter what.
Very very short version is that, yes, it's meant as an allegory but Baum himself got caught up in the wonder of it and pretty much completely abandoned political allegory, though not religious and moral allegory, in the rest of the Oz books. A development that was greatly for the best.
Posted by: alexthechick - come for the Global Warming stay for the SMOD at March 30, 2014 07:04 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Motionview at March 30, 2014 07:05 AM (e6TyM)
Hammett apparently told Hellman that she was the inspiration for his female villains as well.
HA HA HA! I believe that.
Wasn't Hammett the ghost writer for "Hellman's" play, The Little Foxes?
Posted by: Pete in TX at March 30, 2014 07:08 AM (w5MSJ)
Another flaw is that some of Holt's more recent stuff can run a bit long, sometimes wandering off from the original story a bit. This somewhat derailed 'Barking' (a law firm staffed by werewolves) a bit but it was still worth the read.
If you like Terry Pratchett you'll very likely enjoy Tom Holt's work.
Posted by: Epobirs at March 30, 2014 07:09 AM (bPxS6)
Posted by: Adam at March 30, 2014 07:12 AM (Aif/5)
Posted by: Kindletot at March 30, 2014 07:15 AM (LRUgq)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 30, 2014 07:17 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: BornLib at March 30, 2014 07:18 AM (zpNwC)
Irving Finkel is the British Museum's curator for cuneiform. Here, he is investigating a clay tablet whose subject is the structural design of the lost Ark. Not that one; the other one.
Most "Assyriological" books and articles are pretty dry. The relevant languages (Akkadian and Sumerian) have been studied for almost two centuries, and the same goes for the literature; so there is not much left to discuss on either, unless you need to get VERY technical. This book exists because its author believes his text to be interesting enough for the rest of us.
In my view, he's right. Cuneiform is actually kind of cool. The likelihood he relates that the Ark story is urSemitic is even cooler (apparently it's not even Sumerian; the Sumerians borrowed it from the Semites, probably proto-Akkadians).
The book is, shall we say, lightly-edited. This style is not without its charms: where the author writes a run-on sentence because the topic is awesome and he is excited then we get to see it! But then, we *also* get to see that he doesn't care all that much about the blow-by-blow of Bronze Age history. For instance: here Naram-Sin is set to (Sumerian) Ur. Naram-Sin was, in fact, the emperor of Akkad. Shulgi is at least set at Ur (correctly) but then we step, jarringly, right into the Isin-and-Larsa era. There is also the mention of a "Mitannian" language which never existed as such (he might intend the Aryan loanwords in Kikkuli's Hurrian horse-training text). The author is a philologist and an expert in Semitic languages; he is not a historian. (I'll even bet he knows all the stuff I mentioned - as I said, he doesn't care, so he rushed past it.) So, you'll want to stick with the philology.
Also, I noticed the font switched: names like "Atrahasîs" seemed to be in a slightly larger and bolder font than the rest of the narrative.
(I didn't mention the new Semitic-pagan movie about the gods of Earth hating our guts; because Finkel didn't mention it either.)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 30, 2014 07:19 AM (30eLQ)
Yikes. That's like re-watching "Requiem for a Dream". Should I send someone by to confiscate your Joy Division CDs while we're at it?
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 30, 2014 07:22 AM (30eLQ)
Posted by: BornLib at March 30, 2014 07:25 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at March 30, 2014 07:25 AM (1htQa)
This is either a wonderful or terrible idea. I cannot decide which.
Of course, now I have the desperate hope that someone hacks the algorithm and Red Sox and Yankees fans keep getting set up on dates.
Posted by: alexthechick - come for the Global Warming stay for the SMOD at March 30, 2014 07:25 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 30, 2014 07:26 AM (30eLQ)
Posted by: Dack Thrombosis at March 30, 2014 07:26 AM (oFCZn)
Posted by: S. Muldoon, president United Mime Workers local #555 at March 30, 2014 07:27 AM (g4TxM)
Hello fellow ron's!
I'd like to share my favorite book of all time:
HEALER by F. Paul Wilson
It is about a man who becomes immortal while living in the future Galactic Empire. He becomes immortal due to another conscienceness residing in his brain, that is aware down to the cellular level. Very cool story.
Posted by: jt2 at March 30, 2014 07:27 AM (Wy05x)
Ringo has a thing about absurdly precocious Amazon Warrior daughters, as seen in his current Zombie Apocalypse series.
Posted by: Epobirs at March 30, 2014 07:28 AM (bPxS6)
Posted by: Megthered at March 30, 2014 07:28 AM (iR4Dg)
I disliked the series. Too much tech-wank that didn't make sense to me, and the pop-culture references were annoying. Plus, like you said, Cally is unbelievable. Hell, she'd be unbelievable if she was 16.
Posted by: Colorado Alex at March 30, 2014 07:29 AM (lr3d7)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 30, 2014 07:29 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: [/i]andycanuck[/b] at March 30, 2014 07:30 AM (hn5v5)
Posted by: BornLib at March 30, 2014 07:32 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 30, 2014 11:26 AM (30eLQ)
Thank you for that, it looks interesting.
I hope I'm not the only one who presumes the reason why Noah was used as the framework for whatever story it is that Aronofsky is telling is because hey the Bible's public domain.
See re: The Player for a discussion of screenwriting and story ideas.
I should note that I really like Aronofsky's works but I also think he's David Lynch level kookoobananas.
Posted by: alexthechick - come for the Global Warming stay for the SMOD at March 30, 2014 07:34 AM (Gk3SS)
Yes, the HEALER story is a very nicely done self contained story. It references the larger story, but I have never read the rest of the series myself. Perhaps I need to go read those...
The thing I love about this book is how Steve reacts to his 'Partner', and the resulting conversations that he has with the other entity present in his brain.
Posted by: jt2 at March 30, 2014 07:35 AM (Wy05x)
Posted by: Empire1 at March 30, 2014 07:36 AM (iTDQF)
Not much room for fuel / reaction mass, either, seein' where that hatch is.
Posted by: RNB at March 30, 2014 07:36 AM (1/fQ0)
Posted by: Keena at March 30, 2014 07:41 AM (RiTnx)
which goes from the founder Bucklew to the present day. it gives a certain amount of attention, to Marcinko's role in shaping the Seals, but near the end, they outline some five responses we could have had to the assault on Benghazi, from flights out of Sigonella, to a cruise missile strike from Gaeta.
Posted by: Corolianus Snow at March 30, 2014 07:42 AM (Jsiw/)
Posted by: Ed Anger at March 30, 2014 07:44 AM (tOkJB)
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at March 30, 2014 07:44 AM (1htQa)
Posted by: All Hail Eris at March 30, 2014 07:45 AM (QBm1P)
Posted by: ExSnipe at March 30, 2014 07:48 AM (LKJt3)
Posted by: Sandra Flook at March 30, 2014 07:48 AM (Aif/5)
Posted by: Empire1 at March 30, 2014 07:49 AM (iTDQF)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlinSeattle at March 30, 2014 07:50 AM (RZ8pf)
(I hope he as rights so he can bring it out indie)
Posted by: Kindletot at March 30, 2014 07:52 AM (LRUgq)
Posted by: Retired Buckeye Cop at March 30, 2014 07:52 AM (1htQa)
It definitely stands on its own. I recall reading several years before seeing any of his other stuff and learning the SF portion was all the same universe. This book and 'Enemy of the State' are what comes to mind when I think of Wilson, though his Repairman Jack books are far better known.
It's kind of like knowing Dean Koontz as an SF writer before he got huge as a horror writer. A lot of his older horror stuff was done in the same era but under other names while he wrote SF under his own name, with books like 'Demon Seed.' (I'll always have a soft spot for that one because the movie used a lot of familiar locations in my childhood home town. And nekkid Julie Christie.)
Posted by: Epobirs at March 30, 2014 07:53 AM (bPxS6)
I should buy more Sharyn McCrumb books like The Devil Amongst the Lawyers and The PMS Outlaws. After all she managed to make the crazier denizens of a con potential murder suspects in Bimbos of the Death Sun.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 30, 2014 07:53 AM (2yQQy)
Well, that and also that the Bible is a usual target for modern revisionists who don't like what it says but find it a useful vehicle to hijack and use for their own purposes.
Posted by: OregonMuse at March 30, 2014 07:59 AM (fTJ5O)
Posted by: Revised Noah at March 30, 2014 08:00 AM (Aif/5)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlinSeattle at March 30, 2014 08:01 AM (RZ8pf)
I know, right? Spaceship art from the 50s, with all the support struts and vanes, really cracks me up. It's beautiful artwork, but there's no way that thing can ever achieve escape velocity.
Posted by: OregonMuse at March 30, 2014 08:02 AM (fTJ5O)
Posted by: phoenixgirl @phxazgrl at March 30, 2014 08:04 AM (u8GsB)
Posted by: Insomniac at March 30, 2014 08:05 AM (mx5oN)
As opposed to Masamune's Shirow's character Deunan Knute in Appleseed. The humans have managed to make a mess of the world. Deunan is the only child and daughter of an American Green Beret. After her mother is killed he makes it a point to train Deunan to survive. So she and the last member of her father's team become a survival pair in a wasteland. That is when she is recruited by one of the remaining city-states to join their special SWAT. And in Olympus we see the coarseness of Deunan's upringing contrast with utopian thin-veneer of its citizens. Deunan has trust issues and thinks too many people are mush brained.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 30, 2014 08:06 AM (2yQQy)
Posted by: ParanoidGirlinSeattle at March 30, 2014 08:06 AM (RZ8pf)
Ringo does hand-wavey the science in spots but that's the only way you get space crocodile war. Gives you a whole appreciation for hills though.
Meanwhile where's Oneill now?
Posted by: DaveA[/i][/b][/s] at March 30, 2014 08:08 AM (DL2i+)
Posted by: Insomniac at March 30, 2014 08:08 AM (mx5oN)
Here's my heretical admission. I hate Gone With The Wind. Hate the book. Hate hate hate hate the movie. Cannot stand a single thing about it. The only redeeming value I see in Gone With The Wind is that it gave us the Carol Burnett skit.
Posted by: alexthechick - come for the Global Warming stay for the SMOD at March 30, 2014 08:09 AM (Gk3SS)
I found some of the ideas developed to be very interesting. What does the U.S. government do when faced with a existential threat to human life? Preparing the civilian population for guerilla warfare, building fortifications and stock-piling food/resources would all be logical things to do.
I understand that, I just don't buy the way that they go about it. The combat suits made little sense, for example. Why spend all your time and effort when it's cheaper and more effective to pump out that type of armor in thicker sheets and attach it to tanks? The use of antimatter to power rifles, the giant tanks used to attack landers,etc. All of those things were silly, IMHO.
Ringo's strength or failing (depending on your point of view) is that he apparently has a pretty extensive military background and that's what he writes about. Character development is spotty.
Ringo's military background is four years of active duty and two in the guard, never at any high level. I think that impacts his characters because his leaders all seem more like caricatures rather than real people. Also, the idea that everyone in the O'Neill family was some sort of wonderful super-warrior was silly.
Posted by: Colorado Alex at March 30, 2014 08:10 AM (lr3d7)
Posted by: NaCly Dog at March 30, 2014 08:13 AM (u82oZ)
http://tinyurl.com/kx8pyzk
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 30, 2014 08:14 AM (2yQQy)
Don't forget, the human forces were limited in their choices by the alien allies who wanted them to stop the Posleen but not become a player on the galactic stage in the process. The alien 'benefactors' want most of our species annihilated with just enough left over to continue being useful.
Posted by: Epobirs at March 30, 2014 08:15 AM (bPxS6)
Posted by: alexthechick - come for the Global Warming stay for the SMOD at March 30, 2014 12:09 PM (Gk3SS)
Last year Amazon had a big sale on classic books. One of then was GWTW so I got it for $1.99. I thought it was crap and I could not finish it. Scarlett in the book was one real beatch. It was one of those rare instances where the movie was better than the book.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at March 30, 2014 08:16 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: sock_rat_eez at March 30, 2014 08:17 AM (3X3ZR)
Epobirs, which the Humans did become in spite of the oh so smart and smarmy aliens. Watch on the Rhine anyone?
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 30, 2014 08:18 AM (2yQQy)
Posted by: The Man from Athens at March 30, 2014 08:19 AM (O3k74)
Posted by: grammie winger at March 30, 2014 08:19 AM (oMKp3)
Tim did so much to bring me closer to God, but since this happened I've felt alienated from Him and unable to pray. I was also in denial about being angry, since I believed that anyone who understands the glory of Heaven cannot be properly angry at God for bringing a loved one there. And yet, here I am like a four-year-old who's had a favorite plaything snatched away. I've been shutting out God as well as Tim, unable to pray or feel the love that Tim has for me, just on the other side of the veil.
In this book, the author lays out a rich Biblical tradition of angry prayer, and assures us that God can handle our anger. Being honest about the feelings you have is essential for processing grief and anger. And I AM pissed at God for taking my Timmy away at the age of 59. After a lifetime apart, my first love and I got together again only 8 short years ago, and were perfect for each other and so, so happy. Fr the first six months we often wept with joy at being together, happier with every passing day. Tim was making huge strides with his art and music, as well as strengthening his relationship with God. And he was more than my husband and best friend - he was a symbol and a bridge from my youth to middle age, spanning all of the intervening years apart when things were so bad for both of us. I'd planned on at least 25 years with him. So much joy.
So I'm working my way through this book, in hope of "unblocking." You see, the only way I've been able to live for the past 3 months is by not thinking about him or remembering him lovingly, but pushing him out of my mind as much as possible. That disconnects me from who I was when I was with him (which was my bestest self). God, I envy that woman.
I won't be able to get to acceptance (and the subsequent choice of a path forward in a world without Tim) until I face the pain and anguish of confronting God with my suffering, and become reconciled with Him.
Anyway, this book has a lovely light humor to it - quite a juxtaposition with the subject matter. I feel as though it's going to be a big help. I've already ordered three more copies for friends and family.
Posted by: Miley's Tongue at March 30, 2014 08:19 AM (R+h7Q)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 30, 2014 08:21 AM (2yQQy)
http://tinyurl.com/kx8pyzk
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 30, 2014 12:14 PM (2yQQy)
This is very cool.
Posted by: alexthechick - come for the Global Warming stay for the SMOD at March 30, 2014 08:26 AM (Gk3SS)
The problem is that there is no room for motors and fuel if you are going to put people on board.
Posted by: Kindletot at March 30, 2014 08:26 AM (LRUgq)
'World of Trouble: The Last Policeman Book III.'
And of course it was here that I first heard of those books, got them and immensely enjoyed them. So thanks again to all who recommended it.
Interestingly, the prices listed are $1l.47 for the paperback, and $10.99 for the Kindle. I don't own a Kindle, but isn't that kind of high?
Just curious since I really don't know.
Posted by: HH at March 30, 2014 08:28 AM (XXwdv)
Posted by: backhoe at March 30, 2014 08:28 AM (ULH4o)
Also, the drive system is really small, driven by a fusion reactor about the size of a steamer trunk. Recall that Asimov had fusion reactors small enough to go in a belt buckle by the Empire era.
Posted by: Epobirs at March 30, 2014 08:30 AM (bPxS6)
Posted by: HH at March 30, 2014 08:30 AM (XXwdv)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 30, 2014 08:31 AM (2yQQy)
Posted by: Adam at March 30, 2014 08:31 AM (Aif/5)
Posted by: sock_rat_eez at March 30, 2014 08:31 AM (3X3ZR)
Exactly.
Posted by: OregonMuse at March 30, 2014 08:31 AM (fTJ5O)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 30, 2014 08:32 AM (2yQQy)
Posted by: garrett at March 30, 2014 08:33 AM (pSF/a)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 30, 2014 08:34 AM (2yQQy)
Posted by: Slartibartfast at March 30, 2014 08:34 AM (pSF/a)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 30, 2014 08:35 AM (2yQQy)
Posted by: walt at March 30, 2014 08:38 AM (YBusZ)
Just curious since I really don't know.
Posted by: HH at March 30, 2014 12:28 PM (XXwdv)
Yes, it's kind of high but the prices of ebooks are trending to be right in line with physical copies of books. At this point, I just buy the physical copy and then if I want the ebook version, well. You know. There are ways and ways.
Before anyone thinks I'm anti-ereader, remember I own, well, more than one kindle. One of the reasons I got an erearder is because I was running out of room for the books. That's a problem that has not gone away.
Posted by: alexthechick - come for the Global Warming stay for the SMOD at March 30, 2014 08:39 AM (Gk3SS)
Posted by: Big Swingin Al at March 30, 2014 08:39 AM (OZtuG)
I don't think that is so unusual, especially if you are young enough to have had both as an option for first exposure.
Around the time the second movie, IIRC, was in theaters, I was in a bookstore and noticed across the aisle this kid, maybe twelve years old, lecturing a woman who was perhaps his older sister (far too old to be a classmate and far too young to be his mother) about how this book of LOTR artwork got EVERYTHING WRONG.
The book? A collection from the Brothers Hildebrandt, who had been the iconic visualizers of Tolkien for decades. I wanted to recreate the scene in 'Annie Hall' where the Woody Allen character produces McLuhan to tell a guy lecturing in line how little he understands, except it would be Peter Jackson explaining how he grew up with calendars of Hildebrandt art on his bedroom wall.
Posted by: Epobirs at March 30, 2014 08:41 AM (bPxS6)
I'll third that. Hell of an author, very funny. I think he died broke and forgotten in some nursing home in Phoenix a decade or so ago.
Posted by: HH at March 30, 2014 08:43 AM (XXwdv)
I no longer buy "new" releases because there is no reason for the e-version to cost $10+.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at March 30, 2014 08:44 AM (T2V/1)
Posted by: TYV at March 30, 2014 08:45 AM (u0iH7)
Posted by: Adam at March 30, 2014 08:46 AM (Aif/5)
Want to thank who ever rec. 'The Making of the Atomic Bomb' a couple of weeks ago. Led me to read 'Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb' by the same author Richard Rhodes. Good stuff. Excellent all around history and good coverage of the traitorous bastards who gave US atomic secrets to the Russians. For lighter fun I rec Charlie Huston. His 'Caught Stealing' trilogy or vampire series, 'My Dead Body', 'Half The Blood of Brooklyn', 'Already Dead', 'Every Last Drop', 'No Dominion'. Can't remember the order so ya would probably need to check it out. Its fast and entertaining. Even has a clan of Liberal vampires so its current. Huston is a fun read.
Posted by: NC ribs at March 30, 2014 08:47 AM (NdjWK)
Yesterday down in Kenner at an IMPS event ran across someone who knew about Silent Mobius and recognized I was trying to off-load a Korean copy of a Katsumi figure. We had a nice discussion on whether Kiddy Pfhenil had two Gravitons or just one. And no they did not buy the Katsumi figure, darn it.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 30, 2014 08:48 AM (2yQQy)
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 30, 2014 08:51 AM (2yQQy)
Posted by: Anachronda at March 30, 2014 09:05 AM (U82Km)
Hey thanks. Tulsa isn't all that far from me. If I make down that way, going to have to check out his grave, since I love visiting graveyards.
Posted by: HH at March 30, 2014 09:05 AM (XXwdv)
http://www.thebigthrill.org/2014/03/beverly-hills-is-burning-by-neil-russell/
“It was just after midnight when the girl in the blue diamond necklace fell out of the sky.”
Beverly Hills is Burning is the third Rail Black novel. Like the first two, City of War and Wildcase, it is edgy, violent, complex and sometimes sexually graphic. (Hide the picture of your priest.)
Rail Black, a former Delta Force operator, is rich and lives in Beverly Hills. But unlike many wealthy people in the worldÂ’s entertainment capital, Rail is not in show business. In fact, he avoids it at all costs. Until now.
Doing a favor for an ex-con producer, Rail ends up the owner of a movie company. And thereÂ’s nothing fun about this place. Nor about Valentine Jones, the actress who is about to star in the companyÂ’s biggest picture.
Exploding from ninety years in the past, a time when gangsters and
tycoons roamed Hollywood and scratched each otherÂ’s wallets, Rail is
thrust into a labyrinth of murder, duplicity, money, sex and power.
Set in Southern California, New York, Venice, Havana, Mexico and Cyprus, Rail must disentangle the past from the present and come to terms with his feelings for Barrie Fontaine, a long dead woman—and extraordinarily brave pilot—he has never met.
And somewhere, out there, is Matty Aspirins, a hitman on a mission all his own.
BEVERLY HILLS IS BURNING is available from Amazon (here: http://amzn.to/1hUOwFa and the authorÂ’s website (neil-russell.com).
Posted by: SircleMemphis at March 30, 2014 09:06 AM (llp1/)
Posted by: All Hail Eris at March 30, 2014 09:11 AM (QBm1P)
Posted by: simplemind at March 30, 2014 09:13 AM (hTeQK)
Poor Professor Willis Baxter at Powhatten University, ol PU, has been commanded by the Dean to host a party in his apartment. While drunk he is challenged by his academic rival to try and summon a demon. Throwing caution to the wind while knocking back another drink, Baxter sets about summoning a demon while cock-sure its impossible. To his surprise he manages to summon the last demon available, the cute and sexy 16yr old looking mistress of mischief with Titian red hair in many delectable places Anathae. Afterwards Baxter's life is never the same.
Posted by: Anna Puma (+SmuD) at March 30, 2014 09:13 AM (2yQQy)
Posted by: All Hail Eris at March 30, 2014 09:15 AM (QBm1P)
This is why I come to the book thread
Posted by: Gidget at March 30, 2014 09:29 AM (tfg7i)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 30, 2014 09:36 AM (XyM/Y)
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at March 30, 2014 09:48 AM (afLO3)
Posted by: Achilles at March 30, 2014 09:51 AM (oj0hw)
Posted by: JohnJ at March 30, 2014 09:55 AM (TF/YA)
Posted by: waelse1 at March 30, 2014 09:59 AM (tdlxR)
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette at March 30, 2014 10:04 AM (GDulk)
Posted by: waelse1 at March 30, 2014 01:59 PM (tdlxR)
I hope you're not planning on reading book three any too soon - Rothfuss takes longer between books than Sanderson.
Posted by: Tunafish at March 30, 2014 10:06 AM (k2qqq)
Posted by: Tuna at March 30, 2014 10:09 AM (M/TDA)
Posted by: Bookaday at March 30, 2014 10:10 AM (+HEUC)
Posted by: FenelonSpoke at March 30, 2014 10:10 AM (XyM/Y)
Posted by: Tuna at March 30, 2014 10:10 AM (M/TDA)
Posted by: All Hail Eris at March 30, 2014 10:16 AM (QBm1P)
Posted by: BornLib at March 30, 2014 10:28 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: BornLib at March 30, 2014 10:30 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Polliwog the 'Ette at March 30, 2014 10:30 AM (GDulk)
Posted by: BornLib at March 30, 2014 10:33 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: BornLib at March 30, 2014 02:28 PM (zpNwC)
I wish he didn't have so many "Irons in the Fire" so to speak.
While I did like Steelheart, I wish he would cut out the kids stuff and concentrate on The Way of Kings more.
Posted by: Tunafish at March 30, 2014 10:35 AM (k2qqq)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 30, 2014 11:19 AM (30eLQ)
I have seen that typographic convention before, although I can't remember where and it's driving me crazy. I guess it never made it into the Chicago Manual of Style. Since it seems somewhat archaic, I checked a lot of my older books in that general subject area, Cambridge Ancient History, histories of Sumer and Akkad, the Gilgamesh epic (in several translations), etc. Cannot find a single example.
Posted by: CQD at March 30, 2014 10:37 AM (4iOIE)
Posted by: waelse1 at March 30, 2014 10:38 AM (FU4Eq)
Posted by: BornLib at March 30, 2014 10:39 AM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Xavier at March 30, 2014 11:10 AM (Jvm59)
Posted by: TimothyJ at March 30, 2014 11:34 AM (ep2io)
Posted by: boulder toilet hobo at March 30, 2014 12:51 PM (l4SC+)
Posted by: votermom at March 30, 2014 01:13 PM (GSIDW)
Should read 1634 The Baltic War before 1634 Galileo Affair.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at March 30, 2014 01:16 PM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Vic[/i] at March 30, 2014 01:17 PM (T2V/1)
Posted by: Sgt. Mom at March 30, 2014 01:22 PM (Asjr7)
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at March 30, 2014 01:24 PM (afLO3)
Posted by: votermom at March 30, 2014 01:29 PM (GSIDW)
Posted by: votermom at March 30, 2014 05:29 PM (GSIDW)
Yes, I have read that series as well. I gave up on the "Dies The Fire" series.
Posted by: Vic[/i] at March 30, 2014 01:37 PM (T2V/1)
Posted by: votermom at March 30, 2014 01:57 PM (GSIDW)
In stock taking and inventory checking they used/use the @ sign to denote an estimation, an approximation, like in "how many lbs is that pile of potatoes?" "Well, I guess it's circa 200 pounds" — where the Latin word 'circa' means 'approximately' in English.
Circa was naturally shortened by the scribblers to a circle around an a. That is to: @
It's no damned mystery.
Posted by: Yngvar at March 30, 2014 02:44 PM (AJ+Vw)
Posted by: BornLib at March 30, 2014 03:09 PM (zpNwC)
Posted by: Kathy from Kansas at March 30, 2014 05:24 PM (afLO3)
Thanks to both of you. Kathy, I'll check out that book, and look into a retreat as you suggested.
Posted by: Miley's Tongue at March 30, 2014 04:26 PM (R+h7Q)
Posted by: GWB at March 31, 2014 09:57 AM (9eTPJ)
Hide Comments | Add Comment | Refresh | Top
64 queries taking 0.2665 seconds, 312 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.








Posted by: Steck at March 29, 2014 07:15 PM (5i94q)